<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comfort Zone Investing: If I Could Start All Over Again ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/comfort-zone-investing-if-i-could-start-all-over-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/comfort-zone-investing-if-i-could-start-all-over-again/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/comfort-zone-investing-if-i-could-start-all-over-again/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comfort-zone-investing/" rel="tag">Comfort Zone Investing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2011/04/800px-giovannifattori069.jpg"  alt="" />Most investors would like a "do over." </p>
<p>They look back on certain investments and wish they'd never heard of, much less put money in them. Sure things like your good friend's invention that would make beer in one day from water and weeds. Or your brother's idea of selling real estate on Saturn. Everyone has their own stories. Mine are usually related to private investments in the medical device field or biotech, though I did have one out of Florida that made a "pig" that ran through oil pipelines to check on their safety. After meeting the founder who looked more like a used car salesman that caught a great sale on polyester suits, I should have known better right then. But I didn't.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/comfort-zone-investing-if-i-could-start-all-over-again/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Comfort Zone Investing: If I Could Start All Over Again ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/comfort-zone-investing-if-i-could-start-all-over-again/">Comfort Zone Investing: If I Could Start All Over Again ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/comfort-zone-investing-if-i-could-start-all-over-again/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19897461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/04/02/comfort-zone-investing-if-i-could-start-all-over-again/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Amgen</category><category>AMGN</category><category>Apple</category><category>bonds</category><category>comfort zone investing</category><category>diversity</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IBM</category><category>investing</category><category>researching stocks</category><category>ResearchingStocks</category><category>Saving</category><category>stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Allrich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Can everything be a bargain?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/serious-money-can-everything-be-a-bargain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/serious-money-can-everything-be-a-bargain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/serious-money-can-everything-be-a-bargain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aauky/" rel="tag">Anglo American (AAUKY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/decretailsales.jpg" alt="" />Since the stock market is down so much I have been <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/22/chasing-value-starting-2009-now-aauk-apc-deo-and-wfc/">buying something in the fourth quarter almost every week</a>. I have been patient and have been expanding my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/15/serious-money-whats-on-your-watch-list/">watch list</a>. The difficulty for me is that I feel like almost everything is on sale --<em> but is</em> <em>everything a bargain?</em><br /><br />Maybe not; maybe I'm delusional. Perhaps that is because I am tuned into another time and place when I would have been dancing in the streets if I were able to acquire <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anglo-american-plc-american-depositary-shares-exempt-pursuant-to-12g3-2-b/aauk/nas">Anglo American ADR</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anglo-american-plc-american-depositary-shares-exempt-pursuant-to-12g3-2-b/aauk/nas">AAUK</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) for pennies on the dollar. Maybe that is all these stocks are worth? That is what Wall Street currently thinks. That is what Main Street currently thinks. There is a lot more bad news than good.</p>
<p>Then why is Warren Buffett buying, and Carl Icahn and Ken Heebner? After all, I'm just following in their shadows.</p>
<p>The reason is that most investors are simply focused on all the bad news. That is what has most folks' attention and that is making the market -- bankruptcies, billions of dollars in losses, government out of control, Wall Street out of control and more. There is also serious fear things will get worse. If you lost money in the stock market (all of us), or lost your job or your house or any combination of the above, then things look bleak and for now they are. However, we should not be investing for now; we should be investing for the future.</p>
<p>Consider the following elements that support a recovery in the next year. I do not mean a boom, just a recovery -- just a more positive investing environment.</p>
<p>1) By spring it is estimated the government will have poured $2 trillion dollars into an economy of $13 trillion over a 12-month period. Not only is this a market stimulus, but it may prove to be highly inflationary, and if so equities are a better place to be then cash.</p>
<p><em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/serious-money-can-everything-be-a-bargain/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Can everything be a bargain?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/serious-money-can-everything-be-a-bargain/">Serious Money: Can everything be a bargain?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/serious-money-can-everything-be-a-bargain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1408833/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/26/serious-money-can-everything-be-a-bargain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAUK</category><category>bargain stocks</category><category>BargainStocks</category><category>Buffett</category><category>Economy</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>GE</category><category>Heebner</category><category>Housing</category><category>Icahn</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>Investing</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: The sun, oil and PetroChina (PTR) all rise -- and pass GE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/chasing-value-the-sun-oil-and-petrochina-ptr-all-rise-and/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/chasing-value-the-sun-oil-and-petrochina-ptr-all-rise-and/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/chasing-value-the-sun-oil-and-petrochina-ptr-all-rise-and/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ptr/" rel="tag">PetroChina Co Ltd ADR (PTR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/petrochina-ptr-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />To me, it was inevitable that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/petrochina-company-limited/ptr/nys">PetroChina ADR</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/petrochina-company-limited/ptr/nys">PTR</a>) would become one the largest companies in the world, so I am not surprised by news that it has surpassed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/petrochina-company-limited/ptr/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/petrochina-company-limited/ptr/nys">GE</a>) to become <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=PTR:US&amp;sid=aJXHiNjxjTis">the world's second largest company</a>. It now stands behind only <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Exxon Mobile</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">XOM</a>), and has a much faster growth rate.</p>
<p>I have been shouting about this stock to anyone who would listen since I started writing for BloggingStocks, and hopefully a few have taken notice and earned some money with me. While GE has made some modest gains this year moving almost in lockstep with the indices, PetroChina is up almost 70% and has been paying a generous dividend the entire time. PTR reached a value of $434 billion riding the news of $85-a-barrel oil while GE is hanging tough around $413 billion on a down day in the market.</p>
<p>My original thesis when PTR was at $44 a share, paying about a 5.5% dividend yield and carrying a trailing P/E of 9.5, was that this stock was having a fire sale. Since that time, the stock has simply been on fire. I liked this stock because I felt that few things come close to the certainty of the sun rising in the morning, but the Chinese consuming more oil tomorrow than they did yesterday was one of them. The last time I recommended the stock, it was trading at $142.12 last December when I suggested investors add it to their watch lists for an opportunity to acquire it. That opportunity came as it dipped as low as $108.18.</p>
<p><em></em></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/chasing-value-the-sun-oil-and-petrochina-ptr-all-rise-and/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: The sun, oil and PetroChina (PTR) all rise -- and pass GE</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/chasing-value-the-sun-oil-and-petrochina-ptr-all-rise-and/">Chasing Value: The sun, oil and PetroChina (PTR) all rise -- and pass GE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=conewsstory&amp;refer=conews&amp;tkr=PTR:US&amp;sid=aJXHiNjxjTis>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/chasing-value-the-sun-oil-and-petrochina-ptr-all-rise-and/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1013323/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/chasing-value-the-sun-oil-and-petrochina-ptr-all-rise-and/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>oil</category><category>Oil prices reach new highs</category><category>OilPricesReachNewHighs</category><category>PetroChina</category><category>PTR</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Calling all stock pickers - what stocks do you like now?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/calling-all-stock-pickers-what-stocks-do-you-like-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/calling-all-stock-pickers-what-stocks-do-you-like-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/calling-all-stock-pickers-what-stocks-do-you-like-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p>For about 16 months I have been writing about business news, the over-all market, pet peeves and some stocks I like. At times I have responded to inquiries in the comments section or follow-up posts. Sometimes I have responded directly to some of our regular readers. Many of our readers are quite-well versed in the investment world and the stock market in particular; and I have learned some things from them too. On many occasions something a reader has commented on has stimulated another story, and I have done several sagas during my tenure.</p>
<p>BloggingStocks has improved every month and when I look at the company I am keeping lately I am flattered to be among them. Our editors have been extremely encouraging and supportive. One of the best features about this site that I think puts us head and shoulders above others is the almost instant feedback afforded by the comments section and the dialog that ensues. This is not possible in magazines or sites trying to compete online with large business journals.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/calling-all-stock-pickers-what-stocks-do-you-like-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Calling all stock pickers - what stocks do you like now?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/calling-all-stock-pickers-what-stocks-do-you-like-now/">Calling all stock pickers - what stocks do you like now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/calling-all-stock-pickers-what-stocks-do-you-like-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/981065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/calling-all-stock-pickers-what-stocks-do-you-like-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Business Blogs</category><category>BusinessBlogs</category><category>DJIA</category><category>investment blogs</category><category>InvestmentBlogs</category><category>S and P 500</category><category>SAndP500</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Stock Advice</category><category>Stock Investing</category><category>Stock Picking</category><category>Stock Picks</category><category>StockAdvice</category><category>StockInvesting</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>StockPicks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 22:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Implicit Association Test and stock selections]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/the-implicit-association-test-and-stock-selections/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/the-implicit-association-test-and-stock-selections/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/the-implicit-association-test-and-stock-selections/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/illusion.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />I had a chance today to take one of the online <a href="https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/background/index.jsp">Implicit Association Tests (IAT) of Project Implicit,</a> an ongoing study by Harvard-affiliated academics trying to uncover the associations, often subconscious, that guide our perceptions. The test I took was one of gender, and it told me that I am biased toward associating careers with men, family life with women. I admit, I am a product of 1950s television, so the results weren't surprising.</p>
<p>It did cause me, however, to wonder what assumptions we make in considering our portfolio. See if any of these hit the mark -</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Big companies = bad companies.</strong> For us children of the '60s, this message was drilled into us during the protests of companies engaged in weapons research during the Vietnam War. Later, movies such as <em>The China Syndrome</em> and <em>Alien 2</em> mined the same vein. </li>
    <li><strong>Female CEO = Chummy, non-confrontational office atmosphere.</strong> The ghost of Mary Richards, Laverne and Shirley, or Monica, Rachael and Phoebe haunt many of us. </li>
    <li><strong>Chinese profits = American losses.</strong> We faced this in the 1980s with Japan, and Korea. Perhaps this is a holdover from the depression, when so many people believed in the zero sum game; the rich got richer, the poor got poorer. Even though this has been disproven over and over, it seems to be part of the American psyche. It could also be expressed as <strong>Mexican immigrants = loss of American jobs</strong>, although I don't see any of my friends lining up to mow lawns. </li>
    <li><strong>The majority is always right.</strong> You would think such an irrational corollary to the democratic model would find no traction, but there most be a reason for the dot-com bubble. </li>
</ul>
<p>Take a few minutes, if you wish, to take one of the Project Implicit tests. See if it doesn't cause you to wonder about the implicit assumptions that color your judgment. And what do you think are some other assumptions people hold about the stock market that I didn't mention?</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/the-implicit-association-test-and-stock-selections/">The Implicit Association Test and stock selections</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/the-implicit-association-test-and-stock-selections/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/913781/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/the-implicit-association-test-and-stock-selections/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IAT</category><category>implicit assumptions</category><category>ImplicitAssumptions</category><category>Stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Whittling away at the Dow - T, BA, CAT, C, &amp; KO: Part 2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/serious-money-whittling-away-at-the-dow-t-ba-cat-c-and-ko/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/serious-money-whittling-away-at-the-dow-t-ba-cat-c-and-ko/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/serious-money-whittling-away-at-the-dow-t-ba-cat-c-and-ko/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a></p><p>In <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/29/serious-money-whittling-away-at-the-dow-mmm-aa-mo-axp-and-t/"><strong>Part 1 of this series</strong></a>, I found two possible candidates for my Dow value picks, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><strong>Alcoa Aluminum</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alcoa-inc/aa/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><strong>AA</strong></a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><strong>American International Group</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys"><strong>AIG</strong></a>). Here we review the next five DJIA stocks, searching for further value in light of the frequent new Dow highs. Lately, the Dow seems to be benefiting from the number of companies with growing international business, its higher than S&amp;P average yields (2.3 vs 1.8 as a whole), and the safe haven nature of large caps in a precocious market.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><strong>AT&amp;T</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><strong>T</strong></a>) -- Like most of the Dow stocks, T pays a high yield, currently 3.5%, and like the others it pays it consistently. This company is the aggregation of SBC, Pacific Bell, Nevada Bell, Bell-South, AT&amp;T long distance and Cingular Wireless. It is the only one of today's five stocks that I have owned (separately as AT&amp;T and SBC), but I do not own any shares of AT&amp;T now and I do not care to. After all of the expansion done by mergers and acquisitions and only limited internal growth, I am not sure what the upside is. </p>
<p>How much pricing power will the new AT&amp;T have, given ongoing competition in each segment of its business from other wireless carriers, cable television, and VoIP? Considering all of the recent M&amp;A activity, it seems to have relatively low debt and huge cash flow. It also has a P/S, P/B, and P/CF in the lower range of most stocks. But a P/E over 20 is too high given that I do not see where future growth will come from. It seems to me for every competitive battle AT&amp;T might win on one front they may lose an equal amount on another. All things considered, this stock seem fairly priced with limited near-term upside.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/serious-money-whittling-away-at-the-dow-t-ba-cat-c-and-ko/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Whittling away at the Dow - T, BA, CAT, C, &amp; KO: Part 2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/serious-money-whittling-away-at-the-dow-t-ba-cat-c-and-ko/">Serious Money: Whittling away at the Dow - T, BA, CAT, C, &amp; KO: Part 2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 12:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/serious-money-whittling-away-at-the-dow-t-ba-cat-c-and-ko/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/904376/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/serious-money-whittling-away-at-the-dow-t-ba-cat-c-and-ko/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AT and T (T)</category><category>AtAndT(t)</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</category><category>BerkshireHathaway(brk.a)</category><category>Boeing Co (BA)</category><category>BoeingCo(ba)</category><category>Caterpillar (CAT)</category><category>Caterpillar(cat)</category><category>Citigroup Inc. (C)</category><category>CitigroupInc.(c)</category><category>Coca-Cola (KO)</category><category>Coca-cola(ko)</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>EddieLampert</category><category>Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup(gs)</category><category>Sheldon Libr</category><category>SheldonLibr</category><category>Stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>Value investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 12:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: Gannett as value play - not for me]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/gannett-as-value-play-not-for-me/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/gannett-as-value-play-not-for-me/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/gannett-as-value-play-not-for-me/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hnp/" rel="tag">Huaneng Power Intl ADS (HNP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/imb/" rel="tag">IndyMac Bancorp (IMB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ahm/" rel="tag">Amer Home Mtge Investment (AHM)</a></p><p>A few days ago I received the following inquiry from a frequent reader of my blogs on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a>.</p>
<ul><em>Hi Sheldon, what do you think about: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-co-inc/gci/nys">Gannett Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-co-inc/gci/nys">GCI</a>)<br /><br />P/S - 1.72, P/B - 1.65, P/cash - 9.9, dividend - 2.1%, P/E - 12.4<br /><br />Publishing sector - quite hot at the moment? ...alex </em></ul>
    <p>Alex , you are developing a pretty good understanding of the numbers I look at. Now you should add something else to your calculations. The actual business it is in. When we look at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-home-mortgage-investment-corp/ahm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">American Home Mortgage Investment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-home-mortgage-investment-corp/ahm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AHM</a>) (see <a title="View Someone asked about Amercian Home Mortgage on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/someone-asked-about-amercian-home-mortgage/" target="_blank">Someone asked about Amercian Home Mortgage</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/indymac-bancorp-inc/imb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">IndyMac Bancorp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/indymac-bancorp-inc/imb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">IMB</a>) (see <a title="View Chasing Value: IndyMac Bancorp - once in a lifetime on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/01/chasing-value-indymac-bankcorp-im-in-love-with-these-number/" target="_blank">Chasing Value: IndyMac Bancorp - once in a lifetime</a>,) or many other fallen banks and mortgage companies, we can be confident they will bounce back if they survive the lows. There will always be banks. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/gannett-as-value-play-not-for-me/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: Gannett as value play - not for me</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/gannett-as-value-play-not-for-me/">Chasing Value: Gannett as value play - not for me</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 May 2007 16:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/gannett-as-value-play-not-for-me/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/902443/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/23/gannett-as-value-play-not-for-me/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amer Home Mtge Investment (AHM)</category><category>AmerHomeMtgeInvestment(ahm)</category><category>Apple Inc (AAPL)</category><category>AppleInc(aapl)</category><category>Chasing Value</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>Gannett Co (GCI)</category><category>GannettCo(gci)</category><category>Huaneng Power Intl ADS (HNP)</category><category>HuanengPowerIntlAds(hnp)</category><category>IndyMac Bancorp (IMB)</category><category>IndymacBancorp(imb)</category><category>Newspapers</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>value investing</category><category>ValueInvesting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Buffett should buy these five companies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/serious-money-buffett-should-buy-these-5-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/serious-money-buffett-should-buy-these-5-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/serious-money-buffett-should-buy-these-5-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/all/" rel="tag">Allstate Corp (ALL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hrb/" rel="tag">H and R Block (HRB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fo/" rel="tag">Fortune Brands (FO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nue/" rel="tag">Nucor Corp (NUE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a></p><p>Warren Buffett<strong>,</strong> Chairman and CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-de-cl-a/brk.a/nys">Berkshire Hathaway</a> (NYSE:<strong> </strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-de-cl-a/brk.a/nys">BRK.A</a>) has been doing some big time <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/cogitation">cogitating</a> about the future. He plans to donate the lion's share of his wealth to the <a href="http://www.gatesfoundation.org/default.htm">Gates Foundation</a>. Recently, he said he was looking for an understudy with the right investing temperament and wisdom to lead Berkshire. There are reports that his office has been swamped with resumes. Some are reaching to the bottom of the barrel in suggesting that I seek an audience. Perhaps they were stimulated by another <a title="View Serious Money: Freight Railroads - BNI, CSX, UNP &amp; more on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/06/serious-money-freight-railroads-bni-csx-unp-and-more/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b">Serious Money: Freight Railroads - BNI, CSX, UNP &amp; more</font></a> story which I posted the day before Berkshire Hathaway announced it had become BNI's largest shareholder.</p>
<p>So with this and other <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/prescient">prescient</a> commentary I recently posted, I was asked to present some ideas on what acquisitions Berkshire might consider given Buffett's eagerness to find a good deal. It is likely that Buffett will bring several people on board to play the role of Chief Investment Officer for different segments of the company. Nobody in their right mind believes that Buffett is replaceable. </p>
<p>In any event here are some of my ideas on the subject. All of my ideas follow a pattern favored by Buffett including low P/E, P/S, P/B, and P/CF's, as well as a high return on equity and low debt.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/serious-money-buffett-should-buy-these-5-companies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Buffett should buy these five companies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/serious-money-buffett-should-buy-these-5-companies/">Serious Money: Buffett should buy these five companies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 May 2007 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/serious-money-buffett-should-buy-these-5-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/891649/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/09/serious-money-buffett-should-buy-these-5-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007 stock picks</category><category>2007StockPicks</category><category>Allstate Corp (ALL)</category><category>AllstateCorp(all)</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</category><category>BerkshireHathaway(brk.a)</category><category>Fortune Brands (FO)</category><category>FortuneBrands(fo)</category><category>great companies</category><category>GreatCompanies</category><category>H and R Block (HRB)</category><category>HAndRBlock(hrb)</category><category>Nucor Corp (NUE)</category><category>NucorCorp(nue)</category><category>Serious Money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New rule for picking stocks: Do it on the weekend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/new-rule-for-picking-stocks-do-it-on-the-weekend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/new-rule-for-picking-stocks-do-it-on-the-weekend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/new-rule-for-picking-stocks-do-it-on-the-weekend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="middle" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/sunday_new_york_times_biz.jpg" alt="" /><br />It is much better to pick stocks <em>when the market is closed</em> than when it is open. It is much better to pick stocks when you have some peace and quiet. Looking back at stocks I have bought over the last ten years and comparing the results, I would have to say that I have done much better making the decision on the weekend than I did during the trading day with too many distractions, news flashes, and my own rambunctiousness. [From <a href="http://reference.aol.com/dictionary">the dictionary</a><strong> -</strong> marked by uncontrollable exuberance: <a href="http://reference.aol.com/dictionary?dword=unruly">Unruly</a>] </p>
<p>I have found various factors that make a difference in the long-term success of investments. Adding WHEN to make the decision is not a factor I've encountered. Simply put, if I was to create a value fund based on my other tested factors, I can now say with almost absolute certainty that adding the 'When factor' would improve its results. So my short list of stock fund criteria includes the following:</p>
<ul>
    <li> Strong sustainable cash flow </li>
    <li> Low Price-to-Book ratio</li>
    <li> Low Price-to-Sales ratio</li>
    <li> Return on Equity (ROE) higher than the P/E ratio (trailing)<br /></li>
    <li> Positive return on Invested Capital (ROIC)</li>
    <li> <strong>AND NOW</strong> - do not make buy decisions when the market is open</li>
</ul>
<p>I think it is always a good idea to make decisions when one is less stressful, but I never gave it as much thought as I have recently; especially when it comes to stock picking. Those of you who have read my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/">Chasing Value</a> or <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/">Serious Money</a> stories have seen all of this before repeatedly. Now with the last factor, which is not visible to investors in any mutual fund, I add one more area of personal discipline. Of course, for the traders among you, making your decisions when the market is closed might be a tad difficult at times.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. </em><em>Check out his other posts for<strong> BloggingStocks </strong></em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/sheldon-liber/"><em><strong>here</strong></em></a><em><strong>.</strong></em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/new-rule-for-picking-stocks-do-it-on-the-weekend/">New rule for picking stocks: Do it on the weekend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/new-rule-for-picking-stocks-do-it-on-the-weekend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/738957/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/27/new-rule-for-picking-stocks-do-it-on-the-weekend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>Value mutual funds</category><category>ValueMutualFunds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Web 2.0 meets finance in Stockpickr]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/web-2-0-meets-finance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/web-2-0-meets-finance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/web-2-0-meets-finance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a></p><p>As a self-proclaimed Web 2.0 geek (those who know me will agree with that label) I am constantly reading about the next wannabe MySpace, Flickr, and YouTube. On Wednesday, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a> profiled <a href="http://www.stockpickr.com/">Stockpickr</a>, "the stock idea network" targeting the financially inclined and boasting a new partnership with <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/">TheStreet.com</a> (NASDAQ: TSCM). I have to say it was a breath of fresh air. A rarity for Web 2.0 (although certainly not the ONLY Web 2.0 finance company), Stockpickr is proving to be very helpful for those of us who have a hard time choosing stocks and funds. The site allows users to create a profile of the stocks that they normally track and then generates stock ideas based on publicly available investing information. </p>
<p>I haven't had the chance to fully demo it (I do, in fact, have a full-time job) but I did navigate through some of the community profiles on the left side of the page, such as Warren Buffett's holdings. It not only showed me who else bought the stocks Buffett owns, but Stockpickr also told me what else they might recommend for buyers of said stock. For example, if you were interested in Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ:COST), Stockpickr shares what other people who own this stock also bought -- such as, Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX), or Cisco (NASDAQ:CSCO). </p>
<p>Read more of TechCrunch's review of Stockpickr <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/01/03/stockpickr-in-deal-with-the-street-more-to-come/">here</a>. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/web-2-0-meets-finance/">Web 2.0 meets finance in Stockpickr</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/web-2-0-meets-finance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/729407/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/web-2-0-meets-finance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>stock picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>Stockpickr</category><category>TechCrunch</category><category>Web 2.0</category><category>Web2.0</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna Goldman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Valero Energy - My last trade of 2006]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/valero-energy-my-last-trade-of-2006/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/valero-energy-my-last-trade-of-2006/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/valero-energy-my-last-trade-of-2006/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/define/" rel="tag">Define Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vlo/" rel="tag">Valero Energy (VLO)</a></p>My last trade of 2006 was buying Valero Energy Corp. (NYSE: VLO) at $51. It was one of my seven picks published on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/you-dont-have-to-be-007-to-find-the-best-picks-for-2007/">Thursday, December 28, 2006</a> that I did not own at the time. I want to own all seven because I hate the idea that prognosticators always tell others what to do, but do not put their money where their mouth is. There will be no oops, sorry moment for me, hopefully there will not be an ouch moment, either.<br />
<p> </p>
<p>I only picked seven stocks because it is too hard to beat the market without a focused portfolio. The more stocks you have the more you resemble an index fund. When you consider how many stocks James Cramer recommends in a year you have to wonder how following that kind of advice could lead to success. Casting your net wide and hoping to catch something good is not a shrewd investment strategy. You have to pick and choose somehow. <br /></p>
<p>I kept thinking about what the right price to acquire this stock should be and decided the time was now. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/valero-energy-unbelievable-value-for-2007/">After pondering all of the information </a>I shared with our readers, it appeared that if this stock was going lower it would not be by much. However, if it took off to the upside I would be in a bigger quandary. So now I own it and expect to for many years. If it does go down I will probably buy more.</p>
<p><strong>Opportunity: </strong><a title="View Lets discuss your picks for 2007 + 12 of mine to review on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/01/lets-discuss-your-picks-for-2007/" target="_blank">Lets discuss your picks for 2007 + 12 of mine to review</a> if you have some stock ideas you would like me to review publicly.</p>
<p>Check out my other posts for BloggingStocks <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/sheldon-liber/">here</a>. </p>
<p><br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em>Sheldon Liber</em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. </em></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a title="View You don't have to be 007 to find the best picks for 2007! on Blogging Stocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/you-dont-have-to-be-007-to-find-the-best-picks-for-2007/" target="_blank"><font color="#55629b"><strong></strong></font></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/valero-energy-my-last-trade-of-2006/">Valero Energy - My last trade of 2006</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/valero-energy-my-last-trade-of-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/727901/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/valero-energy-my-last-trade-of-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>James Cramer</category><category>JamesCramer</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Stock Picking</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>Valero Energy (VLO)</category><category>ValeroEnergy(vlo)</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer vs Kramer -- Two investing gurus' approaches]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/cramer-vs-kramer-two-investing-gurus-approaches/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/cramer-vs-kramer-two-investing-gurus-approaches/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/cramer-vs-kramer-two-investing-gurus-approaches/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a></p><p><strong>Where do investment ideas come from</strong> and what makes one idea carry more weight than another? Sometimes it is your knowledge or interest in a certain area of business that stimulates you to consider an investment. Sometimes it is the opposite and you feel a need to expand your horizons. It might be the excitement or buzz around a certain company that perks your interest to look further. But often it is the source of the information that does the trick. Maybe sometimes it is a trick, and it is all about presentation.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kramer_vs._Kramer">Kramer vs. Kramer</a> the movie, winner of five Academy Awards, Dustin Hoffman and Meryl Streep played a husband and wife too preoccupied with their careers to put much energy into their family. In the end they separate and Mrs. Kramer gives up on her custody battle for her son concluding he would be better off with Mr. Kramer, who has lost his job in trying to maintain his bond with his son.</p>
<p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/k-vs-c.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />The Kramer/Cramer's of the investment world are at odds with each other too, but not in a personal relationship, only in their delivery of advice.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/cramer-vs-kramer-two-investing-gurus-approaches/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cramer vs Kramer -- Two investing gurus' approaches</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/cramer-vs-kramer-two-investing-gurus-approaches/">Cramer vs Kramer -- Two investing gurus' approaches</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/cramer-vs-kramer-two-investing-gurus-approaches/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/701908/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/cramer-vs-kramer-two-investing-gurus-approaches/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hillary Kramer</category><category>HillaryKramer</category><category>Investment Ideas</category><category>Investment Research</category><category>InvestmentIdeas</category><category>InvestmentResearch</category><category>James Cramer</category><category>JamesCramer</category><category>Kramer vs Kramer</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Stock Analysis</category><category>Stock Picking</category><category>Stock Research</category><category>StockAnalysis</category><category>StockPicking</category><category>StockResearch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
