<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Will subprime meltdown cost $4 trillion, $400 billion, or $104 billion?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/will-subprime-meldtown-cost-4-trillion-400-billion-or-103-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/will-subprime-meldtown-cost-4-trillion-400-billion-or-103-b/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/will-subprime-meldtown-cost-4-trillion-400-billion-or-103-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p>It looks like people in power are getting beyond the point of denying that subprime is a problem. And now they're onto the next stage of trying to decide just how big a problem it is. I have seen estimates ranging from as high as $4 trillion to as little as $104 billion. (This is one area where the son will beat the father. <strong>Bush I's Savings &amp; Loan crisis</strong> cost $240 billion but <strong>Bush II's</strong> looks likely to be far more costly.)</p>
<p>While each estimate covers different aspects of the cost, the big questions that need to be answered are: </p>
<ul>
    <li>What caused the problem? </li>
    <li>What can and should be done to minimize the damage? and </li>
    <li>What changes can be made to keep it from happening again? </li>
</ul>
<p>I don't have real answers to these questions but I think a look at the different estimates of the subprime mortgage meltdown's damage can shed some light on the problem. Here's my take on the three estimates:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/will-subprime-meldtown-cost-4-trillion-400-billion-or-103-b/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will subprime meltdown cost $4 trillion, $400 billion, or $104 billion?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/will-subprime-meldtown-cost-4-trillion-400-billion-or-103-b/">Will subprime meltdown cost $4 trillion, $400 billion, or $104 billion?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/will-subprime-meldtown-cost-4-trillion-400-billion-or-103-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022611/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/will-subprime-meldtown-cost-4-trillion-400-billion-or-103-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage lenders</category><category>subprime mess</category><category>subprime mortgage</category><category>SubprimeMess</category><category>SubprimeMortgage</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
