<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ford struggles to see light at end of the tunnel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/ford-f-struggles-to-see-light-at-end-of-the-tunnel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/ford-f-struggles-to-see-light-at-end-of-the-tunnel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/ford-f-struggles-to-see-light-at-end-of-the-tunnel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/nick-ford-200cs080708.jpg" alt="" />I realize it goes without saying, but times are tough for American auto makers, really tough in fact, and for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>), the company does not see things changing any time soon, and is <a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idINIndia-37266420090102?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=businessNews">predicting another disastrous month for December sales</a> for the ailing auto industry.<br /><br />The company announced today that it believes when final December sales figures are released, we are going to see a horrible month, with Ford estimating that industry-wide, December sales will probably be around 35% lower than the same period last year.<br /><br />When you consider the estimated December numbers you can start to get a feel for just how bad 2008 has been. Consider this: in 2007, industry-wide sales of light vehicles in America totaled 16.2 million. In 2008, that number is expected to drop dramatically down to around 13.2 million light vehicles in reaction to lower consumer spending and tightened credit lending.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/ford-f-struggles-to-see-light-at-end-of-the-tunnel/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford struggles to see light at end of the tunnel</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/ford-f-struggles-to-see-light-at-end-of-the-tunnel/">Ford struggles to see light at end of the tunnel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/ford-f-struggles-to-see-light-at-end-of-the-tunnel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1417137/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/ford-f-struggles-to-see-light-at-end-of-the-tunnel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto makers</category><category>auto sales</category><category>AutoMakers</category><category>AutoSales</category><category>Egypt</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>Syria</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why SEC-mandated disclosure of ties to terrorist states is good]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/why-sec-mandated-disclosure-of-ties-to-terrorist-states-is-good/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/why-sec-mandated-disclosure-of-ties-to-terrorist-states-is-good/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/why-sec-mandated-disclosure-of-ties-to-terrorist-states-is-good/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=FT&amp;date=20071117&amp;id=7829864">According</a> to the <em>Financial Times</em>, "Companies doing business in "terrorist-sponsoring states" could once again have their names under scrutiny under a controversial plan being revived by the Securities and Exchange Commission."<br /><br />In June, the SEC sparked controversy by posting the names of companies that did business with Iran, Sudan, Syria, North Korea, and Cuba. The agency quickly removed the list amid complaints from companies, who complained that the SEC didn't research the materiality of the connections.<br /><br />Now the SEC is considering putting the list back up, and rightfully so. This is all about disclosure and transparency: if investors don't feel that the connections are material, they can ignore the list. But there are people who want to know whether the companies they're investing in have ties to terrorist states, and the SEC has a role in making information available to investors who request it.<br /><br />More information for investors is always a good thing and if companies are embarrassed about showing up on the list, maybe they should reconsider their ties to these countries.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/why-sec-mandated-disclosure-of-ties-to-terrorist-states-is-good/">Why SEC-mandated disclosure of ties to terrorist states is good</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=FT&amp;date=20071117&amp;id=7829864>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/why-sec-mandated-disclosure-of-ties-to-terrorist-states-is-good/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1042849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/why-sec-mandated-disclosure-of-ties-to-terrorist-states-is-good/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>iran</category><category>north korea</category><category>NorthKorea</category><category>SEC</category><category>sudan</category><category>syria</category><category>Terrorism</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil moves higher on inventory report and Middle East tensions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/oil-moves-higher-on-inventory-report-and-middle-east-tensions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/oil-moves-higher-on-inventory-report-and-middle-east-tensions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/oil-moves-higher-on-inventory-report-and-middle-east-tensions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="5" hspace="5" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/oilwells.jpg" />Oil futures have moved higher in today's trading following today's weekly inventory report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration that showed <a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvd1WjYi8DaP0lN08QZ0-jdHsw6Q">inventories shrank much more</a> than analysts had been expecting. After trading up as high as $77.43, prices have cooled off a bit, but are still trading up 15 cents on the day to $75.88.<br /><br />Analysts had been looking to see a drop in oil inventories of around 2.2 million barrels for the week ended August 31, but the actual figures showed that inventories fell by almost twice that amount, dropping 3.9 million barrels.<br /><br />After falling sharply during the first three months in August, prices have been strong over the last couple of weeks and are once again on their way to testing its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/01/oil-hits-new-high-and-continues-its-charge-towards-80/">record high of $78.77</a> set on the first of last month. <br /><br />The oil market is definitely a volatile beast, and any such unexpected decline like the one that we see today is bound to bring the bulls out in full force. Last month's sell off was mainly due to the fact that traders were concerned that the subprime meltdown would start to impact economic growth, but now traders have started to look past this concern and focus once again on supplies.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/oil-moves-higher-on-inventory-report-and-middle-east-tensions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil moves higher on inventory report and Middle East tensions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/oil-moves-higher-on-inventory-report-and-middle-east-tensions/">Oil moves higher on inventory report and Middle East tensions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jvd1WjYi8DaP0lN08QZ0-jdHsw6Q>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/oil-moves-higher-on-inventory-report-and-middle-east-tensions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/982937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/06/oil-moves-higher-on-inventory-report-and-middle-east-tensions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Israel</category><category>oil</category><category>oil inventories</category><category>OilInventories</category><category>Syria</category><category>US Energy Information Administration</category><category>UsEnergyInformationAdministration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
