<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Fed to okay TARP repayment for some banks, appoint a Pay Czar]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/fed-to-okay-tarp-repayment-for-some-banks-appoint-a-pay-czar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/fed-to-okay-tarp-repayment-for-some-banks-appoint-a-pay-czar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/fed-to-okay-tarp-repayment-for-some-banks-appoint-a-pay-czar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/axp/" rel="tag">American Express (AXP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbt/" rel="tag">BB and T (BBT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/usb/" rel="tag">U.S. Bancorp (USB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign02blog.jpg" />This morning, the U.S. Federal Reserve is expected announce that some banks will be allowed to <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/several-banks-may-get-ok-to-repay-tarp/517763">repay the money </a>lent to them under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Some of the banks expected to receive approval are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPMorgan Chase</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>), <a href="http://AXP">American Express</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-express-company/axp/nys">AXP</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">State Street</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">STT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">U.S. Bancorp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-bancorp-del/usb/nys">USB</a>). All of these banks have expressed interest in repaying the government. <br /><br />What is interesting is that there will be yet another Czar joining the White House, a "Repayment Czar," (what is the deal with the media's fascination with Russian royalty?) or as the administration will call the position, the "<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124416737421887739.html">Special Master for Compensation</a>." <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/fed-to-okay-tarp-repayment-for-some-banks-appoint-a-pay-czar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed to okay TARP repayment for some banks, appoint a Pay Czar</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/fed-to-okay-tarp-repayment-for-some-banks-appoint-a-pay-czar/">Fed to okay TARP repayment for some banks, appoint a Pay Czar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/fed-to-okay-tarp-repayment-for-some-banks-appoint-a-pay-czar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19060524/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/08/fed-to-okay-tarp-repayment-for-some-banks-appoint-a-pay-czar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>axp</category><category>bbt</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>ms</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>ObamaAdministration</category><category>stt</category><category>TARP</category><category>TARP money</category><category>TARP repayment</category><category>TarpMoney</category><category>TarpRepayment</category><category>Tim Geithner</category><category>TimGeithner</category><category>usb</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[TARP bankers are lending less and will prolong the recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/tarp-bankers-are-lending-less-and-will-prolong-the-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/tarp-bankers-are-lending-less-and-will-prolong-the-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/tarp-bankers-are-lending-less-and-will-prolong-the-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/bank-vault.jpg" />Remember way back when<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123981607918021761.html#mod=testMod"> the U.S. Treasury said </a>it would no longer keep buying toxic assets, but instead would give TARP money directly to the banks to stimulate lending? The Treasury gave 550 banks $200 billion with the understanding that they would use the money to increase their lending.</p>
<p>Forget about it. Banks are not doing what they were directed to do with the TARP money. The U.S. Treasury reported that lending by the 21 largest banks actually fell by 2.2% across all consumer lending categories in February compared with the prior month. Declines were seen in commercial real estate, general business lending, as well as credit cards and student loans. The only bright spot was mortgage refinancing. With the low interest rates now available, refinancing was up 35% in February.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/tarp-bankers-are-lending-less-and-will-prolong-the-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>TARP bankers are lending less and will prolong the recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/tarp-bankers-are-lending-less-and-will-prolong-the-recession/">TARP bankers are lending less and will prolong the recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123981607918021761.html#mod=testMod>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/tarp-bankers-are-lending-less-and-will-prolong-the-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1518484/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/17/tarp-bankers-are-lending-less-and-will-prolong-the-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank loans</category><category>BankLoans</category><category>inthenews</category><category>TARP money</category><category>TarpMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shh! All 19 banks will pass 'stress tests']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/mahidoodi.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />First of all, let me say that Federal law prohibits the disclosure of all bank "stress tests" and bank examinations, so everything said here is pure hearsay.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, we have some good news: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09bank.html?ref=business">Banks are holding up well under Federal examination</a>. All 19 banks will pass their stress tests. The bad news is that they still may need additional taxpayer money. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Shh! All 19 banks will pass 'stress tests'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/">Shh! All 19 banks will pass 'stress tests'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/business/09bank.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1513118/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/10/shh-all-19-banks-will-pass-stress-tests/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>BankingSector</category><category>featured</category><category>stress tests</category><category>StressTests</category><category>tarp money</category><category>TarpMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America may need more capital]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/bank-of-america-may-need-more-capital/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/bank-of-america-may-need-more-capital/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/bank-of-america-may-need-more-capital/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/bac-bank-of-america-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) CEO Ken Lewis has based what is left of his reputation on the fact that the firm does not need another dime in government money. As a matter of fact, he regrets taking as much TARP cash as he did.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aQtZLKAka1CE&amp;refer=home">According to</a> <em>Bloomberg</em>, Oppenheimer &amp; Co. believes that "Bank of America Corp., the largest U.S. bank, needs to raise $36.6 billion in equity to bring capital ratios in line with its peers." In this environment, that money is not going to come from the private sector. The only entity with the stones to put it up is the U.S. government.</p>
<p>While the money may not come in exchange for common stock, any instrument is likely to have some conversion provisions, which means that dilution is possible. With a market cap of $44 billion, current Bank of America shareholders will be facing a large haircut if Oppenheimer is right. The stock trades at $7.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/bank-of-america-may-need-more-capital/">Bank of America may need more capital</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/bank-of-america-may-need-more-capital/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1512472/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/09/bank-of-america-may-need-more-capital/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BAC</category><category>featured</category><category>Ken Lewis</category><category>KenLewis</category><category>Oppenheimer</category><category>tarp money</category><category>TarpMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup and Morgan Stanley may add to bank shenanigans]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/c-citigroup-logo.jpg" />Yesterday, there was outrage about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) and the bonus payments the firm said it is legally bound to make. Today, it is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) that are looking for new ways to anger the rest of America. <br /><br /><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/ms-morgan-stanley-logo.jpg" /><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> is reporting that officials at both troubled banks are looking into <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123724826580949187.html">ways to circumvent federal caps on bonuses</a>. Reportedly, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley, along with "other financial institutions that got government aid," are negotiating to raise base salaries for some executives and "other top-producing employees." Remember, the bonus caps were part of the recent stimulus package that President Obama okayed last month.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup and Morgan Stanley may add to bank shenanigans</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/">Citigroup and Morgan Stanley may add to bank shenanigans</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1490309/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/17/citigroup-and-morgan-stanley-may-add-to-bank-shenanigans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>government</category><category>inthenews</category><category>poor business decisions</category><category>PoorBusinessDecisions</category><category>questionable payments</category><category>QuestionablePayments</category><category>tarp</category><category>tarp money</category><category>TarpMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is the bank bailout plan getting out of hand?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/is-the-bank-bailout-plan-getting-out-of-hand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/is-the-bank-bailout-plan-getting-out-of-hand/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/is-the-bank-bailout-plan-getting-out-of-hand/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/redacted/58241935/"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/32/58241935_c1c8ba3865_m.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>This whole bank bailout mess is getting ridiculous. The newest wrinkle is that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE5185BM20090209">insurance companies are getting approval to acquire banks </a>so that they can get a chunk of the TARP bank bailout money. Why we are bailing out insurance companies is a mystery.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, banking regulators last month approved applications from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-hartford-financial-services-group-inc/hig/nys">Hartford Financial Services Group Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-hartford-financial-services-group-inc/hig/nys">HIG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lincoln-national-corporation/lnc/nys">Lincoln National Corp Ind</a>. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lincoln-national-corporation/lnc/nys"> LNC</a>) to become savings and loan holding companies so they can get a bite of the TARP money. In addition, about a dozen insurers have applied for capital injection.</p>
<p>Insurance companies have been seeking federal funds to boost their coffers after large investment losses.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/is-the-bank-bailout-plan-getting-out-of-hand/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is the bank bailout plan getting out of hand?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/is-the-bank-bailout-plan-getting-out-of-hand/">Is the bank bailout plan getting out of hand?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/hotStocksNews/idUSTRE5185BM20090209>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lincoln-national-corporation/lnc/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-hartford-financial-services-group-inc/hig/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/is-the-bank-bailout-plan-getting-out-of-hand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454730/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/is-the-bank-bailout-plan-getting-out-of-hand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>HIG</category><category>insurers bailout</category><category>InsurersBailout</category><category>LNC</category><category>TARP money</category><category>TarpMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Create a 'good bank,' not a 'bad bank']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/create-a-good-bank-not-a-bad-bank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/create-a-good-bank-not-a-bad-bank/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/create-a-good-bank-not-a-bad-bank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />There is talk by the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, the U.S. Congress and bankers about creating a <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c24ff97c-e972-11dd-9535-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1">"bad bank"</a> and let the government use the next tranche of the bailout money to take the losses from the banks and put them in this bad bank.</p>
<p>First of all, why anyone would want to create something "bad" is beyond a rational person's comprehension. Why not create something "good." Why not take the second half of the TARP money and create a <strong>"good bank,"</strong>one that is solvent, a bank that everyone can trust, a bank for the future not the past. If we create a "bad bank," there is no future. The money is just wasted again.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/create-a-good-bank-not-a-bad-bank/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Create a 'good bank,' not a 'bad bank'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/create-a-good-bank-not-a-bad-bank/">Create a 'good bank,' not a 'bad bank'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c24ff97c-e972-11dd-9535-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.time.com/time/2007/crimes/18.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/create-a-good-bank-not-a-bad-bank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1439638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/create-a-good-bank-not-a-bad-bank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bad bank</category><category>BadBank</category><category>good bank</category><category>GoodBank</category><category>TARP money</category><category>TarpMoney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
