<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Bill Gates dethroned as world's richest person]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/bill-gates-dethroned-as-worlds-richest-person/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/bill-gates-dethroned-as-worlds-richest-person/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/bill-gates-dethroned-as-worlds-richest-person/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Chairman Bill Gates -- <strong>net worth: $59.2 billion</strong> -- is no longer the world's wealthiest person. According to the <em><a href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22010750-5005961,00.html">HeraldSun</a></em>, Mexico's Carlos Slim -- <strong>net worth: $67.8 billion</strong> -- now sits in that throne. In April, Slim surpassed <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/berkshire-hathaway-inc-del/brk.a/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BRK.A</a>) CEO Warren Buffett as the world's second richest person. And today, Slim surpasses Gates.</p>
<p>How must Gates feel? I don't know. He has commented in the past that he doesn't think about being the world's wealthiest person much. But he has occupied that throne since <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates">1995</a>. After 12 years, there could be a twinge of regret at having lost the crown. But Gates still has plenty of money, particularly since Buffett contributed a huge chunk of his fortune to Gates' foundation.</p>
<p>Meanwhile how did Slim climb so fast? A 27% surge in the share price of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/america-movil-s-a-b-de-c-v/amx/nys?from=lookup">America Movil</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/america-movil-s-a-b-de-c-v/amx/nys?from=lookup">AMX</a>), Latin America's largest mobile phone operator controlled by Slim, from March to June enabled Slim to surpass Gates by $8.6 billion. The 5.7% increase in Microsoft stock in the second quarter was no match for the sharp rise in valuations of Slim's companies. He also owns shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/telefonos-de-mexico-s-a-de-c-v/tmx/nys">Telefonos de Mexico</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/telefonos-de-mexico-s-a-de-c-v/tmx/nys">TMX</a>) up 11% and <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=MXK%3AGFINBURO">Grupo Financiero Inbursa S.A.</a> (MXK: <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=MXK%3AGFINBURO">GFINBURO</a>) up 20%. </p>
<p>While I don't have earnings forecasts to evaluate Inbursa, it's not too late to consider buying in to Slim's other companies.</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div><strong>American Movil.</strong> AMX's PEG of 1 -- based on a P/E of 26.2 on earnings growth of 26% to $4.22 in 2008 -- looks reasonable to me.</div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><strong>Telmex.</strong> TMX's PEG of 2.5 -- based on a P/E of 12 on earnings growth of 4.9% to $3.31 in 2008 -- looks expensive to me -- I'd avoid this one.</div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>It's not every day that a king gets dethroned. The market is sending a signal that might be worth heeding.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned in this post.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/bill-gates-dethroned-as-worlds-richest-person/">Bill Gates dethroned as world's richest person</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/bill-gates-dethroned-as-worlds-richest-person/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/932019/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/bill-gates-dethroned-as-worlds-richest-person/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>American Movil</category><category>AmericanMovil</category><category>AMX</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>BillGates</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>Carlos Slim</category><category>CarlosSlim</category><category>GFINBURO</category><category>Grupo Financiero Inbursa S.A.</category><category>GrupoFinancieroInbursaS.a.</category><category>Telefonos de Mexico</category><category>TelefonosDeMexico</category><category>TMX</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><category>WarrenBuffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Three humbly-suggested stock picks for 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/03/three-humbly-suggested-stock-picks-for-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/03/three-humbly-suggested-stock-picks-for-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/03/three-humbly-suggested-stock-picks-for-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Last year the stocks mentioned in my newsletter, <em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html">The Cohan Letter</a></em>, were up 15%, 1% better than my benchmark, the S&amp;P 500. But it was a humbling year, so I offer three stock picks for 2007 with a suggestion that you study them carefully.</p>
<p>2006 was humbling because my picks (I focus on three stocks in each monthly edition) trailed the market throughout much of the year. However, they ended up prevailing due to a late December surge in some of the top performing stocks -- e.g., Telefonos de Mexico, S.A. (ADR) (NYSE: TMX) was up 36% from $20.83 when I first mentioned it to $28.26 and Wal-Mart de Mexico (ADR) (OTC: WMMVY) rose 28% from $34.25 (I blogged about it <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/05/say-no-to-wal-mart-say-si-to-walmex/">here</a>) to $43.85. This was due to portfolio managers' practice of window dressing -- buying stocks that have done well right at the end of the year so they can report to their shareholders that they owned the stocks.</p>
<p>Since 1998, <a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2006/01/cohan-letter-233-in-2005.html">when public sources began tracking my stock picks</a>, I've been fortunate to have outperformed the S&amp;P 500 in all but one year (in 2003, my stock picks were up 23% compared to 29% for the S&amp;P 500). Since 1998, my stock picks have averaged a 67% annual return compared to a 6% return for the S&amp;P 500. However, 2006 was by far the worst year for my stock picks -- the second worst was 2004 when my picks were up 20% compared to 9% for the S&amp;P 500.</p>
<p>One of the key reasons for these results is <strong>limiting losses through a 2% stop loss</strong> on stocks mentioned in <em>The Cohan Letter</em> -- if a stock's price falls 2% below the level at which it was noted, the stock is sold. To put the importance of this rule into context, I used it to dump 61% of the 36 stocks highlighted in 2006. Without it, my stock picks would have lost money for investors. </p>
<p>So it is with a serious helping of humble pie that I offer these three stocks to consider for 2007: </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/03/three-humbly-suggested-stock-picks-for-2007/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Three humbly-suggested stock picks for 2007</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/03/three-humbly-suggested-stock-picks-for-2007/">Three humbly-suggested stock picks for 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/03/three-humbly-suggested-stock-picks-for-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/727360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/03/three-humbly-suggested-stock-picks-for-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Affiliated Managers Group</category><category>AffiliatedManagersGroup</category><category>America Movil</category><category>AmericaMovil</category><category>Comcast Corporation</category><category>ComcastCorporation</category><category>Telefonos de Mexico</category><category>TelefonosDeMexico</category><category>The Cohan Letter</category><category>TheCohanLetter</category><category>Wal-Mart de Mexico</category><category>Wal-martDeMexico</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:44:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
