<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Glasses-Free 3D TV in the Works from Toshiba]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/glasses-free-3d-tv-in-the-works-from-toshiba/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/glasses-free-3d-tv-in-the-works-from-toshiba/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/glasses-free-3d-tv-in-the-works-from-toshiba/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/toshiba-logo-red.jpg"  alt="Toshiba logo" />Japanese company Toshiba Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/toshiba-corp-unsp-adr/tosyy/nao">TOSYY</a>) introduced the latest development in three-dimension (3D) television: <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/toshiba-unveils-glasses-free-3-d-tv/1309574" target="_blank">glasses-free 3D</a>.</p>
<p>The company's latest TV takes one of the biggest customer complaints about 3D TV technology (those bulky glasses) and eliminates said problem. Of course, there is some concern that consumers will not like the newest TV, as they have to sit rather close in order to see the images in 3D. It is recommended that the viewer sit 35.4 inches and 25.6 inches from the respective models.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/glasses-free-3d-tv-in-the-works-from-toshiba/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Glasses-Free 3D TV in the Works from Toshiba</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/glasses-free-3d-tv-in-the-works-from-toshiba/">Glasses-Free 3D TV in the Works from Toshiba</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/glasses-free-3d-tv-in-the-works-from-toshiba/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19659359/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/glasses-free-3d-tv-in-the-works-from-toshiba/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3D television</category><category>3DTv</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LCD</category><category>television</category><category>Toshiba</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MLB Games Coming to Sony PS3]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/mlb-games-coming-to-sony-ps3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/mlb-games-coming-to-sony-ps3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/mlb-games-coming-to-sony-ps3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/sony-sne-playstation.jpg" />There's a new chapter this week in the constant quest to make video game consoles about more than just video games: Sony (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) is rolling out technology that will stream Major League Baseball games live, directly to your PlayStation 3.<br />
<br />
Video game console makers -- including Sony, Microsoft (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) with its Xbox, and Nintendo (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>) with its Wii -- have taken great pains to ensure that their devices do more than just play the latest Mario or Halo title. As <a target="_blank" href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/jeff_reeves/march-video-game-sales-activision-atvi-electonic-arts-erts-sony-sne.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=investorplace">March video game sales figures show,</a> hardware sales are still anemic thanks to weak consumer spending. Pitching their products as multi-use entertainment devices is one strategy to stop the downward trend.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/mlb-games-coming-to-sony-ps3/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MLB Games Coming to Sony PS3</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/mlb-games-coming-to-sony-ps3/">MLB Games Coming to Sony PS3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/mlb-games-coming-to-sony-ps3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19450902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/23/mlb-games-coming-to-sony-ps3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>DirecTV</category><category>DTV</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>sne</category><category>SONY</category><category>television</category><category>VideoGames</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Reeves]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspapers Claim to be Classified Leaders]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mnst/" rel="tag">Monster Worldwide (MNST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/coffee_stock.jpg" alt="" /><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/investor.jpg" alt="" />Newspaper websites seem to be the preferred source of local news for <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Newspapers_Claim_to_be_Classified_Leaders'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>consumers, according to the Newspaper Association of America and comScore (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/comscore-inc/scor/nas">SCOR</a>). Fifty-seven percent of respondents are drawn to local <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaper/">newspaper</a> websites. But take this with a grain of salt: 54% chose online portals and 53% selected local <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/television/">television</a> websites. In terms of what consumers consider the most trusted local news source to be, newspapers have the lead, but the gap is narrowing. Now, only 33% choose the newspaper for this reason, with local television sites pulling in 32%.<br /> <br /> "While newspaper Web sites often face dozens of competitors touting their own local offerings in any given market, they have been able to thrive by leveraging trusted brands and strong local content to appeal to consumers and advertisers alike," <a target="_blank" href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1004070834">John Sturm, president and CEO of the NAA, said in a statement</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newspapers Claim to be Classified Leaders</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/">Newspapers Claim to be Classified Leaders</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1004070834>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19374771/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/26/newspapers-claim-to-be-classified-leaders/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Careerbuilder</category><category>comscore</category><category>gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>HotJobs</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>monster</category><category>MSFT</category><category>msn</category><category>MWW</category><category>naa</category><category>new york times</category><category>news corp</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper association of america</category><category>NWS</category><category>nyt</category><category>SCOR</category><category>television</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Kicking Confidence Under the Belt (SCHW, BRCD, PALM, THC, STT, SPG, BAM)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/closing-bell-kicking-confidence-under-the-belt-schw-brcd-pa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/closing-bell-kicking-confidence-under-the-belt-schw-brcd-pa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/closing-bell-kicking-confidence-under-the-belt-schw-brcd-pa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/schw/" rel="tag">Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" alt="" />The market was flat to weak this morning before key data and then the reading that consumer confidence fell all the way down to 46.0 from 56.5 in January, well under the 55.0 estimate from Bloomberg, added insult to injury. We saw profit taking take hold after that, and any early gains were taken away with the market in the red most of the day. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,282.41 -100.97 (-0.97%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,094.60 -13.41 (-1.21%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,213.44 -28.59 (-1.28%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/02/23/top-10-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-brcd-glw-disca-fslr-kft-mir-paas-palm-rimm-tkc/">Top Analyst Upgrades/Downgrades</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/02/23/todays-best-market-rumors-2232010/">Top Stock Market Rumors</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/closing-bell-kicking-confidence-under-the-belt-schw-brcd-pa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Kicking Confidence Under the Belt (SCHW, BRCD, PALM, THC, STT, SPG, BAM)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/closing-bell-kicking-confidence-under-the-belt-schw-brcd-pa/">Closing Bell: Kicking Confidence Under the Belt (SCHW, BRCD, PALM, THC, STT, SPG, BAM)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/closing-bell-kicking-confidence-under-the-belt-schw-brcd-pa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19370354/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/closing-bell-kicking-confidence-under-the-belt-schw-brcd-pa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brocade</category><category>simon property group</category><category>SimonPropertyGroup</category><category>state street</category><category>StateStreet</category><category>television</category><category>tenet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[With NBC in Shambles, Jefferies Upgrades CBS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/with-nbc-in-shambles-jefferies-upgrades-cbs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/with-nbc-in-shambles-jefferies-upgrades-cbs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/with-nbc-in-shambles-jefferies-upgrades-cbs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/cbs-logo-240.jpg" />This morning, Jefferies &amp; Co. upgraded television network CBS Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys" target="_blank">CBS</a>), <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/permalinks/entry.php/CBSid1186422" target="_blank">elevating the media company</a> to buy from hold. Jefferies also upped CBS's price target to $16 from $12. According to the broker, CBS's recent strength in ad pricing indicates that more advertisers are likely to pay upfront for advertising time. This likelihood means that the company should not face uncertainty and need to resort to higher prices due to the scatter market. <br /><br />The brokerage cited the fact that the third quarter of 2009 saw companies purchasing ads mere days away from the commercial's air time. This time window is now closer to four weeks. Jefferies stated, "We further note that CBS has one of the only good stories to tell advertisers with ratings up at the network."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/with-nbc-in-shambles-jefferies-upgrades-cbs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>With NBC in Shambles, Jefferies Upgrades CBS</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/with-nbc-in-shambles-jefferies-upgrades-cbs/">With NBC in Shambles, Jefferies Upgrades CBS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/with-nbc-in-shambles-jefferies-upgrades-cbs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19323811/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/with-nbc-in-shambles-jefferies-upgrades-cbs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>CSI</category><category>featured</category><category>how i met your mother</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NBC</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>television</category><category>The Big Bang Theory</category><category>two and a half men</category><category>upgrades</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah to pull the plug in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><img alt="Oprah Winfrey " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Oprah Winfrey, arguably the most powerful woman in entertainment (if not the world in general), is <a href="http://www.cnbc.com//id/34050986" target="_blank">preparing to pack</a> her luxurious bags. She's announced that in 2011, after a quarter-century of favorite things and heartfelt interviews, "The Oprah Winfrey Show" will be no more. The last program is scheduled for Sept. 9, 2011. One can only imagine who might be her guests. <br /><br />In syndication across the country, Oprah's eponymous program is the top-rated U.S. daytime show (take that, <em>Days of Our Lives!</em>), with an average viewership of 7.1 million this year. <br /><br />While not entirely unexpected, the news is likely a bit of a blow to CBS Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys" target="_blank">CBS</a>), as its CBS Television Distribution arm syndicates the program. Additionally, Walt Disney (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys" target="_blank">DIS</a>) might feel the sting of an Oprah departure as Disney-owned ABC is the primary network that airs the show. And will it impact O, Oprah's monthly magazine published by the Heart Corporation? To say nothing of all of the manic women in the audience who long for a chance at one of Oprah's favorite things. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oprah to pull the plug in 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/">Oprah to pull the plug in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com//id/34050986>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247263/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Discovery Communications</category><category>DiscoveryCommunications</category><category>entertainment</category><category>featured</category><category>Harpo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah winfrey show</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>OprahWinfreyShow</category><category>television</category><category>TV</category><category>Walt disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Broadcasters, ad folks desperate for a better audience-measuring mousetrap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/04/television200ro0120.jpg" />It took a while, but the broadcast media community is starting to realize that <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-09-10-audience-network-tv_N.htm" target="_blank">Nielsen Media may not have the answers</a> to all their audience-related questions.</p>
<p>So, 14 of the largest players in the space -- including programmers, advertisers, and ad buyers -- are shelling out some cash to see if there's a better way. The group claims it isn't looking for an alternative to Nielsen ... but let's do the math on this one. If they aren't looking for some new choices, then just what the hell are they doing?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Broadcasters, ad folks desperate for a better audience-measuring mousetrap</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/">Broadcasters, ad folks desperate for a better audience-measuring mousetrap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19158992/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/12/broadcasters-ad-folks-desperate-for-a-better-audience-measuring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadcasters</category><category>cbs</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>omc</category><category>omnicom</category><category>television</category><category>timewarner</category><category>twx</category><category>walt disney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney's third-quarter earnings expected to decline]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/disneys-third-quarter-earnings-expected-to-decline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/disneys-third-quarter-earnings-expected-to-decline/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/disneys-third-quarter-earnings-expected-to-decline/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ando_yo/2114734064/"><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="165" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/mickey.jpg" /></a>This afternoon,the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) is going to be reporting its fiscal <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/07/29/ap6717114.html">third quarter earnings</a>.</p>
<p>Analysts are expecting to see the company hit hard by the current recession, with all segments of the company's business have felt the impact.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/disneys-third-quarter-earnings-expected-to-decline/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney's third-quarter earnings expected to decline</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/disneys-third-quarter-earnings-expected-to-decline/">Disney's third-quarter earnings expected to decline</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/disneys-third-quarter-earnings-expected-to-decline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19113931/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/30/disneys-third-quarter-earnings-expected-to-decline/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>advertising</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Disney World</category><category>earnings</category><category>ESPN</category><category>mickey mouse</category><category>television</category><category>theme parks</category><category>Walt Disney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></div>
<p>Last week, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) reported its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-reports-2009-first-quarter-results/rfid211295084">Q1 results</a>. Above all, investors interested in this business look at one thing: cash flow. Why? Take a look at WWE's dividend yield. </p>
<p>As of Tuesday's close, the stock was yielding almost 13%! That's high. And a high dividend yield often indicates that a dividend cut may be in the offing -- the theory being that if the yield were sustainable, then buyers would rush in, and their activities would eventually lower the yield by driving the price higher. </p>
<p>Well, WWE hasn't had a great time of it when it comes to cash flow. I found this out when I examined the company's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/">third quarter</a>. Net cash from operations, unfortunately, has been overpowered at times by the dividend obligation. In fact, according to the Q4 report (<a href="http://corporate.wwe.com/news/documents/PRESSRELEASEFINAL2-24-09.pdf">pdf file)</a>, operational cash flow for 2008 dropped significantly to roughly $36 million, and the dividend obligation was over $80 million. </p>
<p>And that was before capital investments. That's sort of like the Undertaker throwing Mankind off the top of a steel cage. In other words, it's not pretty, folks. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/">World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-reports-2009-first-quarter-results/rfid211295084>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://corporate.wwe.com/news/documents/PRESSRELEASEFINAL2-24-09.pdf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/thanks-for-nothing-disney/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1544385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>mankind</category><category>television</category><category>undertaker</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CBS sees sales decline and a loss in Q1]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/08/cbs-sees-sales-decline-and-a-loss-in-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/08/cbs-sees-sales-decline-and-a-loss-in-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/08/cbs-sees-sales-decline-and-a-loss-in-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/cbs-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>) programmed its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/cbs-corporation-reports-first-quarter/rfid211446432">Q1 earnings</a> report Thursday after the bell. If the report had been a pilot, it would have been canceled immediately. </p>
<p>Revenues slipped over 13% to around $3.2 billion. CBS said it lost 8 cents per share. Talk about a failure of a quarter. Last year at this time, CBS made 36 cents per share. True, the comparison was a difficult one, since a change in distribution strategy for the international placement of the <em>CSI</em> asset enhanced the previous year's results. </p>
<p>But let's not get hung up on difficult comparisons. CBS simply had a bad three months. A very bad three months indeed. Oh, and I should note that <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/autoNews/idUKTRE5468IM20090507?sp=true">analysts</a> thought CBS might earn 7 cents per share. That seems almost comical at this juncture. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/08/cbs-sees-sales-decline-and-a-loss-in-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CBS sees sales decline and a loss in Q1</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/08/cbs-sees-sales-decline-and-a-loss-in-q1/">CBS sees sales decline and a loss in Q1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 May 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/cbs-corporation-reports-first-quarter/rfid211446432>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/autoNews/idUKTRE5468IM20090507?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/08/cbs-sees-sales-decline-and-a-loss-in-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1540052/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/08/cbs-sees-sales-decline-and-a-loss-in-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>advertising</category><category>CBS</category><category>CSI</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Fox</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>NBC</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp. reports big declines in operating income and cash flow  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/news-corp-reports-big-declines-in-operating-income-and-cash-flo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/news-corp-reports-big-declines-in-operating-income-and-cash-flo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/news-corp-reports-big-declines-in-operating-income-and-cash-flo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/nws-news-corp-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), a media concern that competes with companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC Universal, issued its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/news-corporation-reports-third-quarter/rfid211049689">Q3 report</a> on Wednesday after the bell. The numbers weren't that great, but you know what? The stock rallied anyhow in the after-hours session, rising over 3%. That's typical of what's been happening: Stocks are going higher even on weak news. Maybe the bears <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/closing-bell-did-the-bears-just-capitulate-grmn-bx-v-amzn/">truly are heading back</a> to hibernation. </p>
<p>News Corp. revenues declined by 16%. In terms of earnings, we'll look at operating income since, in this particular case, the numbers involve a lot of gains. This metric dropped 46%. And cash flow from operations for the nine-month period plunged well over 50%. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/news-corp-reports-big-declines-in-operating-income-and-cash-flo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp. reports big declines in operating income and cash flow  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/news-corp-reports-big-declines-in-operating-income-and-cash-flo/">News Corp. reports big declines in operating income and cash flow  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 May 2009 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/news-corporation-reports-third-quarter/rfid211049689>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/news-corp-reports-big-declines-in-operating-income-and-cash-flo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1538927/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/07/news-corp-reports-big-declines-in-operating-income-and-cash-flo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Fox</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>television</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cable companies working to curb free online TV ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cable-companies-working-to-curb-free-online-tv/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cable-companies-working-to-curb-free-online-tv/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cable-companies-working-to-curb-free-online-tv/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/tv_art_piece_240.jpg" alt="" />Right now, over at <a href="http://Hulu.com">Hulu.com</a> -- a joint project of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Company</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys" target="_blank">GE</a>) NBC Universal, viewers can check out recent editions of, for example, <em>The Daily Show </em>or <em>Man Caves,</em> among many other programs normally viewed on cable networks such as Comedy Central or the DIY Network. Viewers need a computer and a high-speed Internet connection to catch these programs, but they <em>don't</em> need a cable subscription (or even a television!). <br /><br /><em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cable-companies-working-to-curb-free-online-tv/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cable companies working to curb free online TV </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cable-companies-working-to-curb-free-online-tv/">Cable companies working to curb free online TV </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/30/business/media/30cable.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cable-companies-working-to-curb-free-online-tv/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1502284/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/cable-companies-working-to-curb-free-online-tv/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>comcast</category><category>hulu</category><category>inthenews</category><category>online television</category><category>OnlineTelevision</category><category>streaming video</category><category>StreamingVideo</category><category>television</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tina Fey denies McDonald's product placement on '30 Rock']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/tina-fey-denies-mcdonalds-product-placement-on-30-rock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/tina-fey-denies-mcdonalds-product-placement-on-30-rock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/tina-fey-denies-mcdonalds-product-placement-on-30-rock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/83/245346708_292fe07fc2_m.jpg" target="_blank"><img height="267" alt="McDonald's McFlurry - Made Popular on " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/mcflurry.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>My secret shame . . . last Friday, I blew my ever-present diet and tried my first McFlurry at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys" target="_blank">MCD</a>). I was driven to the Golden Arches not by a craving or a bad day, but by Jack Donaghy, the arrogant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys" target="_blank">GE</a>) executive played so masterfully by Alec Baldwin on <em>30 Rock</em>, broadcast by GE's own NBC Network. <br /><br />In the Valentine's themed episode, Jack and lady love Elisa (Salma Hayek in a multi-arc guest-starring role) partake in the frozen concoction, praising it as "the world's greatest dessert." Soft ice cream, M&amp;Ms, whipped together and served with the world's most practical-looking spoon? What could go wrong?<em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/tina-fey-denies-mcdonalds-product-placement-on-30-rock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tina Fey denies McDonald's product placement on '30 Rock'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/tina-fey-denies-mcdonalds-product-placement-on-30-rock/">Tina Fey denies McDonald's product placement on '30 Rock'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tvguide.com/News/30Rock-Fey-McDonalds-1002943.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/tina-fey-denies-mcdonalds-product-placement-on-30-rock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463421/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/tina-fey-denies-mcdonalds-product-placement-on-30-rock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>30 rock</category><category>30Rock</category><category>alec baldwin</category><category>AlecBaldwin</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mcd</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>mcflurry</category><category>nbc</category><category>television</category><category>tina fey</category><category>TinaFey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whedon's 'Dollhouse' flops; how long will FOX hang on?  ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/28/46904854_399ad78ed0_m.jpg" target="_blank"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/joss-whedon.jpg" id="img1" alt="" /></a>Fans of Joss Whedon's critically acclaimed and cult-followed shows, <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer </em>and<em> Angel</em>, were amped about the creator/writer/director's latest project, <em>Dollhouse</em>. Unfortunately? <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/02/dollhouse-terminator-premiere-ratings.html" target="_blank">Few of them</a> tuned in. <br /><br />The Eliza-Dushku mid-season effort, a sci-fi series about special agents who can be cloned with traits and personalities, saw just 4.7 million viewers tune in, nabbing a 6 share and a 2.0 rating among adults 18-49. In fact, <em>Dollhouse </em>was the second lowest-rated series premiere this season (on a major network). Guys? It was beaten by <em>Supernanny</em>, which aired on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys" target="_blank">DIS</a>) ABC and attracted 6.1 million viewers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whedon's 'Dollhouse' flops; how long will FOX hang on?  </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/">Whedon's 'Dollhouse' flops; how long will FOX hang on?  </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/02/dollhouse-terminator-premiere-ratings.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463155/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/whedons-dollhouse-flops-how-long-will-fox-hang-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>angel</category><category>buffy the vampire slayer</category><category>BuffyTheVampireSlayer</category><category>dollhouse</category><category>fox</category><category>joss whedon</category><category>JossWhedon</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable's one-penny promotion backfires]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/time-warner-cables-one-penny-promotion-backfires/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/time-warner-cables-one-penny-promotion-backfires/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/time-warner-cables-one-penny-promotion-backfires/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/television.jpg" alt="" /></em>Thanks to Jason Voorhees and Jennifer Aniston, Time Warner (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) had a very successful weekend at the box office, <em></em>as Steven Mallas <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/time-warner-and-jason-take-the-top-spot-at-the-box-office/">pointed out</a><em></em> earlier. It was a different story, however, for Time Warner Cable (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc/twc/nys">TWC</a>), which quickly saw a nice offer unravel into a customer-service nightmare. <br /><br />For Valentine's weekend, the company had <a target="_blank" href="http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2009/02/13/this-weekend-time-warner-offers-40-movies-for-1-cent-each/10576/">offered</a> its Southern California customers a so-called "1 Cent Love N' Movies Deal," featuring 40 movies on demand for a penny each. Titles included romantic favorites such as <em>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Sixteen Candles, </em>and <em>Love Actually</em>, along with some newer titles including <em>Burn After Reading</em>. <br /><br />So what's the problem? <a target="_blank" href="http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2009/02/15/time-warner-cable-apologizes-for-1-cent-movie-mess/10656/">According</a> to the <em>OC register</em>, the promotion "attracted three times more viewers than the company anticipated," leading to movies that were unable to be watched. Angered customers can call customer service and receive a coupon good for one one-penny movie. But, as the <em>register </em>points out, the coupon will only be sent to those proactive enough to call in. <br /><br />Additionally, this fiasco puts the promotion into the news, likely prompting Midwesterners and East-Coasters to wonder why they, too, weren't deemed worthy of such "special" treatment? <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon works for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.weseed.com/">WeSeed.com</a>. The above comments are not intended as trading or investment advice.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/time-warner-cables-one-penny-promotion-backfires/">Time Warner Cable's one-penny promotion backfires</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://gadgetress.freedomblogging.com/2009/02/15/time-warner-cable-apologizes-for-1-cent-movie-mess/10656/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/time-warner-cables-one-penny-promotion-backfires/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1461111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/time-warner-cables-one-penny-promotion-backfires/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>on demand</category><category>OnDemand</category><category>television</category><category>time warner</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/sidney-crosby.jpg" alt="" />No, we aren't talking about a great deal of cross promotion between my Cincinnati Reds and my Columbus Blue Jackets or anything (although the thought of my right-handed doppelganger, <a href="http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/AaronHarang2226011_Reds_v_Giants.jpg">Aaron Harang</a> on skates should intimidate even the toughest hockey player), but Major League Baseball Advanced Media (MLBAM) and the National Hockey League (NHL) are teaming up. <br /><br />The two are going to start co-selling an online video package where out-of-market game subscriptions for both leagues will be marketed in tandem. According to <a href="http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/61479"><em>The Sports Business Journal</em></a> (SBJ), this deal "marks a rare level of cooperation between sports entities with limited common ownership."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/">MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454790/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business</category><category>business partnership</category><category>BusinessPartnership</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>national hockey league</category><category>NationalHockeyLeague</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time for an ex-Wall Streeter reality show]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/time-for-an-ex-wall-streeter-reality-show/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/time-for-an-ex-wall-streeter-reality-show/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/time-for-an-ex-wall-streeter-reality-show/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/comic-relief/" rel="tag">Comic Relief</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/money-losers-200-angelo-mozilo-cs121707.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />There have been <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/29036830">numerous</a> stories about the plight of the newly unemployed former Wall Street hotshot and it really is quite sad. Hard-working paper pushers have gone from seven-figure bonuses to the unemployment office. and in particularly dire cases, they've had to transfer kids to less elite private schools or perhaps even sell an Aspen ski lodge.</p>
<p>All of this could make for a fascinating CNBC reality show styled after hits like <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Surreal_Life">The Surreal Life</a></em> and <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Life">The Simple Life</a></em>. Call it <em>The Severed Life</em>. The show would feature recently laid-off high level corporate executives, including former CEOs who left with massive severance packages, there to serve as punching bags: Richard Fuld, Angelo Mozilo, and Ken Lewis -- Oh wait, he somehow still has a job. Lesser-known cast members might include investment bankers and hedge fund managers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/time-for-an-ex-wall-streeter-reality-show/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time for an ex-Wall Streeter reality show</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/time-for-an-ex-wall-streeter-reality-show/">Time for an ex-Wall Streeter reality show</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/time-for-an-ex-wall-streeter-reality-show/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1452995/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/time-for-an-ex-wall-streeter-reality-show/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Angelo Mozilo</category><category>CNBC</category><category>Ken Lewis</category><category>Reality television</category><category>Richard Fuld</category><category>Television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lions Gate buys TV Guide properties: Why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/lions-gate-buys-tv-guide-properties-why/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/lions-gate-buys-tv-guide-properties-why/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/lions-gate-buys-tv-guide-properties-why/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p>So, I just read that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">Lions Gate Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>) purchased TVGuide.com and TV Guide Network from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macrovision-solutions-corporation/mvsn/nas">Macrovision Solutions Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/macrovision-solutions-corporation/mvsn/nas">MVSN</a>) for over $250 million. Here's the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/macrovision-and-lionsgate-announce/rfid172684709">press release</a>. The question I have is: Why would Lions Gate want to do this?</p>
<p>I know I'm going to be called pretty ignorant by some for even thinking to disagree with this move, but nevertheless, I disagree with this move. The reason is simple (to me, at least). If I were a shareholder of the company, I think I'd rather have management focus on creating content as opposed to spending a lot of money to buy up a platform. Sure, these TV Guide properties have a high level of brand equity and are indeed widely distributed. But a quarter of a billion dollars is a lot of money, a sum that could have been allocated toward new movie franchises and content acquisitions. </p>
<p>Does Lions Gate really want the hassle of integrating the TV Guide portfolio into its business? Won't that distract the company from focusing on its desire to build a great library of movies and television shows so that it can become an attractive buyout candidate someday? I mean, let me get specific for a second. Take the <em>Saw</em> franchise. That's getting a little long in the tooth, isn't it? I look at that quarter-billion bucks and see a bunch of seed money for a ton of new concepts. If only a few made it to <em>Saw</em>-level, then I can only imagine that it would help shareholder value. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/lions-gate-buys-tv-guide-properties-why/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lions Gate buys TV Guide properties: Why?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/lions-gate-buys-tv-guide-properties-why/">Lions Gate buys TV Guide properties: Why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/macrovision-and-lionsgate-announce/rfid172684709>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/lions-gate-buys-tv-guide-properties-why/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1419520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/lions-gate-buys-tv-guide-properties-why/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CMCSA</category><category>Comcast</category><category>content</category><category>FEARnet</category><category>Lions Gate Entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>Macrovision Solutions</category><category>MacrovisionSolutions</category><category>movies</category><category>MVSN</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>television</category><category>TV Guide</category><category>TvGuide</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should NBC have let Leno go?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/nbculogo.jpg" />I found <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/">myself writing</a> about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) NBC the other day, specifically about CEO Jeff Zucker's apparent flummoxed realization that radical changes may be needed to stanch the ratings erosion that have plagued the major broadcast networks in this brave new media world. Now, I have another, equally interesting subject to look at: Jay Leno will be <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0926481820081210?rpc=33&amp;sp=true">given a talk show</a> after he hands <em>The Tonight Show</em> over to Conan O'Brien. The program will air on weeknights from 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. </p>
<p>As we all probably know by now, NBC was intent on having O'Brien take over Leno's position as a way of ensuring that he would stay at the network. Leno, as one would imagine, reportedly hated giving the job up. NBC, however, did not want Leno to head over to another network. Supposedly, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ABC was perhaps interested in taking Leno on. So, the powers that be at the Peacock net have secured the services of Mr. Leno by offering him the chance to do something new: namely, distribute his schtick at an earlier time.</p>
<p>Okay, I'll tell you, I think this is a ridiculous idea. On many levels. Let's talk about level one: is this even going to work? Do people want to see Leno at 10 p.m.? Hey, maybe they will. But I get the feeling that this might be too much of a change for people used to seeing Leno at 11:30. Let's go to level two: why does NBC want to program what would essentially be two <em>Tonight Shows</em>? Won't there be some cannibalization going on here? You always hear media companies whining about cannibalization.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should NBC have let Leno go?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/">Should NBC have let Leno go?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/is-nbc-panicking/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN0926481820081210?rpc=33&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1396583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/10/should-nbc-have-let-leno-go/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>conan obrien</category><category>ConanObrien</category><category>David Letterman</category><category>DavidLetterman</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Jay Leno</category><category>JayLeno</category><category>Jeff Zucker</category><category>JeffZucker</category><category>Johnny Carson</category><category>JohnnyCarson</category><category>NBC</category><category>Pixar</category><category>talk shows</category><category>TalkShows</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Will Disney resist the recession?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/earnings-preview-will-disney-resist-the-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/earnings-preview-will-disney-resist-the-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/earnings-preview-will-disney-resist-the-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/disney.jpg" alt="" />Get ready, Mouse fans. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) will be letting Wall Street know this Thursday if its fourth quarter was a good one or not. A lot of eyes will be on the company. Shareholders will want to know the outlook for the theme parks and how the advertising marketplace is treating the company's media holdings. So far, things haven't been too bad at Disney, but many on Wall Street are expecting the recession is to catch up to the company. I expect this myself. So I'll be perusing the conference-call transcript for such items as guest spending at the parks and the quality of the scatter advertising market at ABC. I'll also be keeping my eye out for comments about the consumer-products segment and the company's investments in the video-game division. Disney is spending a lot on the latter, and I think shareholders need to have an idea of how the portfolio of games to be released during the holiday season is expected to perform. In terms of the former, I want to know if the Disney brand is working its magic in the retail channels.</p>
<p>In terms of the bottom line, <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=DIS&amp;coid=129198&amp;client=cb">Earnings.com</a> says that income should be about $0.49 per share. That would represent growth of roughly 17%. I'd be happy with that double-digit number. And I'm pretty sure that estimates will be beat by a penny or two, knowing the company's reputation. But as a shareholder, I tend to be more interested in the cash-flow statement. I like to see how much free cash has been generated, and how the company is using it. In fact, we'll get the cash-flow number for the last twelve months this Thursday. I'll want to see how many shares have been repurchased, and I'll be interested in attempting to gauge what the next dividend increase is likely to be. Disney likes to take shares back as a way of rewarding shareholders, but management really needs to do a better job with the dividend, as I think it could be higher. I would expect that Disney will deliver a decent cash-flow statement.</p>
<p>And how are the Disney Channel franchises faring? Is <em>Hannah Montana</em> wearing out her welcome? Somehow, I don't think that will be the case; someday soon, sure, but not just now. And will the next <em>High School Musical</em> movie be released on the big screen with a new cast? I would appreciate one of the analysts out there inquiring about that. The whole Disney-Channel-incubator thing has been a powerful force for both the company and the brand, and I'm sure CEO Bob Iger will be crowing about it. But I'd love to know what his spreadsheets are saying about the longevity at this point for the current franchises. Will Disney know when it's time to sell out of one fad and invest in another? For that matter, how are the Jonas Brothers doing? We do hear about them, but they don't have the same iconic value of a Miley Cyrus, do they? They don't to me, at least, but maybe I'm just out of the loop. Iger should explain what plans the company has to turn them into the next truly big thing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/earnings-preview-will-disney-resist-the-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Will Disney resist the recession?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/earnings-preview-will-disney-resist-the-recession/">Earnings preview: Will Disney resist the recession?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=DIS&amp;coid=129198&amp;client=cb>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/earnings-preview-will-disney-resist-the-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1362513/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/earnings-preview-will-disney-resist-the-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>110508</category><category>ABC</category><category>advertising</category><category>bob iger</category><category>BobIger</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>jonas brothers</category><category>JonasBrothers</category><category>miley cyrus</category><category>MileyCyrus</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>television</category><category>theme parks</category><category>ThemeParks</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
