<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy's economic indicator: The Playmate Index]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/playboy_cover.jpg" />Recently, various writers have been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/weekinreview/19lewin.html">alluding</a> to Terry Pettijohn's now-mythical survey of the relationship between <em>Playboy </em>Playmates and the economy. Pettijohn's argument is that, as times get tougher, male concepts of beauty shift toward more mature, stable-looking women who are older, taller, and less curvy. Conversely, in boom times, the woman of choice would be shorter, younger, and more hourglass-shaped.<br /><br />While my knowledge of <em>Playboy </em>Playmates was once disturbingly encyclopedic, I have to admit that I have been out of the game for quite some time now. That said, I'd have to question Professor Pettijohn's methodology, if only for the fact that the <em>Playboy </em>ideal has shown far less fluctuation over the years than society at large. To put it bluntly, many of the heroin addict-thin models that grace the pages of women's fashion magazines would never be allowed within arm's length of a <em>Playboy </em>pictorial. Like the <a href="http://www.daleassociation.com/images/Rockettes.jpg">Rockettes</a>, Playmates have traditionally remained within a comfortably healthy median, neither ballerina scrawny nor fully zaftig.<br /><br />Now, arguably, there could be some comparisons drawn between economic boom/bust cycles and the shapes of women's bodies. Certainly, the androgynous flapper look of the 1920's, the Twiggy look of the 1960's, and the starvation victim/heroin addict look of the late 1990's/early 2000's are somewhat comparable. Similarly, the hourglass 1940's, 1950's, and 1980's have similar style cues. While it would be silly to take these comparisons to extremes, fashion goes in cycles, and those cycles overlap somewhat with the economy. However, this is far from a direct confluence; the 1930's look, for example, was still boyish, and our current ultra-thin look has been developing for quite some time.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy's economic indicator: The Playmate Index</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/">Playboy's economic indicator: The Playmate Index</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1375865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic indicators</category><category>EconomicIndicators</category><category>featured</category><category>kate moss</category><category>KateMoss</category><category>playboy</category><category>playmates</category><category>Rockettes</category><category>Terry Pettijohn</category><category>TerryPettijohn</category><category>twiggy</category><category>Venus of Willendorf</category><category>VenusOfWillendorf</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
