<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Universal Pictures had a great year -- does it matter?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/nbculogo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Recently, Zac Bissonnette took <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) and its press-release wizards to task for essentially issuing a document that was full of spin but low on substance. This was in regard to Amazon having its "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/amazon-spin-machine-declares-it-the-best-christmas-ever/">best Christmas ever</a>." I'm sure you've heard about it. Well, I was looking at an article yesterday that talked about some box-office numbers from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures asset. I kind of got the same feeling about the numbers as Zac did about the Amazon Christmas thing. </p>
<p>Of course, keep in mind, the <a href="http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=814047">article</a> I was looking at was not a press release. Still, the execs at NBC Universal are surely pretty proud about the numbers. After all, they are supposed to be best-ever stats. On the domestic side of things, Universal achieved a total box-office gross of approximately $1.1 billion. </p>
<p>On the international front, the studio brought in $1.7 billion. The year-over-year growth rate was flat for domestic theaters, and for international theaters, the company saw a robust 66% increase. Personally, I'm not impressed. To begin with, domestic was flat, and that's not good. And as for international, well, there was no context in terms of the effects of currency rates. </p>
<p>Plus, does it really matter if a studio is achieving high grosses? There's never any comment about profits and losses on specific titles, compensation structures for the stars, etc. To me, this data doesn't say a lot (admittedly, I'll never be satisfied with the amount of disclosure that studios are required to give on their movie projects). </p>
<p>The article mentions two films as drivers for the year that, in my opinion, underperformed in the domestic marketplace: <em><a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=incrediblehulk.htm">The Incredible Hulk</a></em>, based on the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) character, and the latest sequel in the <em><a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=mummy3.htm">Mummy</a></em> franchise. The latter barely made it over the $100 million mark, and the former only grossed a little better than $130 million. Big deal. You would have figured that Universal could have squeezed some more box-office bucks out of these properties.</p>
<p>Many on Wall Street believe that GE should rid itself of NBC Universal. I'm not one of them, but I concede that Universal Pictures needs to do better. Seriously, Universal Pictures did okay, but not great, in '08. I sincerely hope that CEO Jeffrey Immelt does not allow the studio to rest on these laurels. That would be a shame, and a slap in the face to shareholders. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own GE; positions can change without notice.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/">Universal Pictures had a great year -- does it matter?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/amazon-spin-machine-declares-it-the-best-christmas-ever/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=814047>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=mummy3.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=incrediblehulk.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1416635/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeffrey Immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>The Mummy</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>TheMummy</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>Zac Bissonnette</category><category>ZacBissonnette</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
