<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Google and Cisco volatility at low end of range]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/options-update-google-and-cisco-volatility-at-low-end-of-range/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/options-update-google-and-cisco-volatility-at-low-end-of-range/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/options-update-google-and-cisco-volatility-at-low-end-of-range/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas/option-chains"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" />Google</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas/option-chains">GOOG</a>) closed at $390. <em>The New York Times</em> says: "New mood in antitrust may target Google." The <em>WSJ </em>reported Silicon Valley and GOOG are under a new tough phase antitrust scrutiny. GOOG June option implied volatility is at 32, below its 26-week average of 49 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas/option-chains">Cisco</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas/option-chains">CSCO</a>) closed at $19.75. CSCO's Unified Computing System (UCS) is expected to ship in June. CSCO June option implied volatility of 35 is below its 26-week average of 48, according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement.</p>
<p><em>Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/options-update-google-and-cisco-volatility-at-low-end-of-range/">Options Update: Google and Cisco volatility at low end of range</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 May 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/options-update-google-and-cisco-volatility-at-low-end-of-range/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1548941/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/options-update-google-and-cisco-volatility-at-low-end-of-range/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>csco</category><category>goog</category><category>inthenews</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>Silicon Valley</category><category>SiliconValley</category><category>The New York Times</category><category>The WSJ</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><category>TheWsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How rumors burn investors: Is Sirius (SIRI) filing for Chapter 11?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/how-rumors-burn-investors-is-sirius-siri-filing-for-chapter-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/how-rumors-burn-investors-is-sirius-siri-filing-for-chapter-1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/how-rumors-burn-investors-is-sirius-siri-filing-for-chapter-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/sirius-siri-logo.gif" />Last night, several media sources said <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-xm-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius XM</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-xm-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>) was going to file for Chapter 11. True or false? The fact is, the media did not know, but the stock could sell off sharply this morning on the rumor.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/technology/companies/11radio.html?ref=technology">According to</a> <em>The New York Times</em>, "A bankruptcy would make Sirius XM one of the largest casualties of the credit squeeze." So, the paper has an entire article on the "possibility" that Sirius shareholders will be wiped out today or tomorrow.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/how-rumors-burn-investors-is-sirius-siri-filing-for-chapter-1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How rumors burn investors: Is Sirius (SIRI) filing for Chapter 11?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/how-rumors-burn-investors-is-sirius-siri-filing-for-chapter-1/">How rumors burn investors: Is Sirius (SIRI) filing for Chapter 11?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/how-rumors-burn-investors-is-sirius-siri-filing-for-chapter-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1456713/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/11/how-rumors-burn-investors-is-sirius-siri-filing-for-chapter-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DISH</category><category>inthenews</category><category>SIRI</category><category>THe New York Times</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If WSJ ad revenue is off 20%, other papers may face worse]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/if-wsj-ad-revenue-is-off-20-other-papers-may-face-worse/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/if-wsj-ad-revenue-is-off-20-other-papers-may-face-worse/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/if-wsj-ad-revenue-is-off-20-other-papers-may-face-worse/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/nytphoto.jpg" />According to a transcript of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-limited-the/nws/nas">News Corp</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation-limited-the/nws/nas">NWS</a>) earnings call <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/2/kicking-around-the-new-york-times-rupe-cheers-up">posted on</a> <em>Alley Insider, </em>advertising revenue at <em>The Wall Street Journal </em>is down 20% so far this year. What does that say for <em>The Boston Globe</em> or <em>The New York Times</em> which are both owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times Company</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>)?</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-mcclatchy-company/mni/nys">McClatchy</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-mcclatchy-company/mni/nys">MNI</a>), the third largest newspaper chain in the US, announced a quarterly operating loss yesterday. That means it no longer has the money to pay interest on its debt. Either creditors will have to take a haircut or the company's papers will have to be sold. off.</p>
<p>It is now clear that no major newspaper in America is making a dime. Some reports say that <em>The Globe </em>loses $1 million a week.</p>
<p>Selling big newspaper may be impossible even if the price for some of them may just be $1. A new owner would have to be willing to shoulder huge operating losses and there may be no recovery in site.</p>
<p>The primary newspapers in some of the nation's largest cities may go away this year.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/if-wsj-ad-revenue-is-off-20-other-papers-may-face-worse/">If WSJ ad revenue is off 20%, other papers may face worse</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/if-wsj-ad-revenue-is-off-20-other-papers-may-face-worse/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1452221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/06/if-wsj-ad-revenue-is-off-20-other-papers-may-face-worse/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>MNI</category><category>NWS</category><category>NYT</category><category>The Boston Globe</category><category>The New York Times</category><category>TheBostonGlobe</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Slumping U.S. economy not entirely Bush's fault]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><em>New York Times</em> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/opinion/07krugman.html">NYT</a>) columnist and economist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/opinion/07krugman.html">Paul Krugman</a>, author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Conscience-Liberal-Paul-Krugman/dp/0393060691/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1215532585&amp;sr=1-1"><em>The Conscience of a Liberal,</em></a> would never be confused with a loyal backer of the economic policies of President Bush.
<p>Still, Krugman, in the academic tradition that argues that a scholar's most important word is "valid," gives President Bush credit where credit is due -- or at least a lack of blame. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/opinion/07krugman.html">Krugman says</a> it's true that the U.S. economy is a mess, but it's not true that the bad economy is entirely President Bush's fault. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/opinion/07krugman.html">Krugman outlines </a>the unfortunate reality regarding the U.S. economy's 2001-2008 performance: recession, followed by one of the weakest recoveries since World War II, followed by another slump that technically isn't a recession yet. When President Bush leaves office, Krugman says, the U.S. economy will have created five million jobs, not nearly enough to keep up with population growth. By contrast, 22 million jobs were created during the Clinton Administration.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's Krugman: Slumping U.S. economy not entirely Bush's fault</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/">NYT's Krugman: Slumping U.S. economy not entirely Bush's fault</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1248969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/08/nyt-s-krugman-slumping-u-s-economy-not-entirely-of-bush-s-maki/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gasoline prices</category><category>gdp</category><category>health care</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job creation</category><category>jobs</category><category>oil prices</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>The Conscience of a Liberal</category><category>The New York Times</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times bestseller list leaves Harry Potter out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/new-york-times-leaves-harry-potter-out-cold/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/new-york-times-leaves-harry-potter-out-cold/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/new-york-times-leaves-harry-potter-out-cold/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p>(<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Scholastic Press</a>, NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/scholastic-corporation/schl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SCHL</a>)'s Harry Potter won't rank on the <em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nyt/nys">The New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nyt/nys">NYT</a>))' best sellers list. You might wonder how could that could possibly be true. It's simple. In a move which is said to have been a knee-jerk reaction to complaints by the sellers and publishers of more "serious" books, <em>The New York Times</em> banished "children's books" to a secondary list of their own, thus clearing the Harry Potter series from its ownership of three spots within the top fifteen positions on best sellers lists. That was supposedly to open those spots for occupancy by more deserving titles.<br /><br />How yawn inspiring is that? We all know just how well those Harry Potter books have sold. What the whole thing signals to me is that the book watchers of <em>The New York Times</em> were just too stupidly motivated to stop and think that the Potter-displacing category change would only further instill the obviousness of their palpable impertinence.<br /><br />The Harry Potter books don't need <em>The New York Times</em>, they never did and they never will. As a matter of fact, good literature never needed the <em>Times</em>. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=Harry%20Potter">Harry Potter</a> books made <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=J.K.Rowling%20">J.K.Rowling </a>the wealthiest author on the planet by virtue of Harry's own magic. Frankly, the <em>Times</em> and their top ten list had little to say about that.<br /><br /><strong>More <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/harry%20potter/">Harry Potter</a> news<br /> <br /> </strong><strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/the-harry-potter-finance-quiz/" title="View The Harry Potter Finance Quiz on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">The Harry Potter Finance Quiz</a><br /> <strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/harry-potter-ending-a-water-cooler-cheat-sheet/" title="View Harry Potter ending: A water cooler cheat sheet on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Harry Potter ending: A water cooler cheat sheet</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/with-harry-potter-done-is-it-time-for-scholastic-to-sell-itself/" title="View With Harry Potter done, is it time for Scholastic to sell itself? on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">With Harry Potter done, is it time for Scholastic to sell itself?</a><br /> <strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/rowling-safeguards-potter-empire/" title="View Rowling safeguards Potter empire on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Rowling safeguards Potter empire</a><br /> <strong>Zac Bissonnette: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/22/is-the-last-book-the-end-of-potter-mania/" title="View Is the last book the end of Potter mania? on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Is the last book the end of Potter mania?</a><br /> <strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/harry-potter-and-the-pots-of-gold/" title="View Harry Potter and the Pots of Gold on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Harry Potter and the Pots of Gold</a><br /> <strong>Barry Summerlin: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/18/harry-potter-doesnt-even-need-muggle-marketing/" title="View Harry Potter doesn't even need Muggle marketing on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Harry Potter doesn't even need Muggle marketing</a><br /> <strong>Julie Tilsner: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/16/not-even-harry-can-save-bookstores-from-their-fate/" title="View Not even Harry can save bookstores from their fate on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Not even Harry can save bookstores from their fate</a><br /> <strong>Peter Cohan: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/09/harry-potter-and-the-pot-of-gold/" title="View Harry Potter and the Pot of Gold on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Harry Potter and the Pot of Gold</a><br /> <strong>Tom Barlow: </strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/06/harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-will-rowling-kill-off-harr/" title="View Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Will Rowling kill off Harry? on BloggingStocks" target="_blank">Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Will Rowling kill off Harry?</a><strong><br /> </strong><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/new-york-times-leaves-harry-potter-out-cold/">New York Times bestseller list leaves Harry Potter out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-giltz/why-harry-potter_b_57099.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/new-york-times-leaves-harry-potter-out-cold/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/946630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/new-york-times-leaves-harry-potter-out-cold/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harry Potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>The New York Times</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><category>top ten list</category><category>TopTenList</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 19:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Frank Blake, CEO, The Home Depot &amp; the Board of Directors: Are you listening?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/frank-blake-ceo-the-home-depot-and-the-board-of-directors-are-y/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/frank-blake-ceo-the-home-depot-and-the-board-of-directors-are-y/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/frank-blake-ceo-the-home-depot-and-the-board-of-directors-are-y/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a></p><p><em>Dear Mr. Blake,</em></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">The Home Depot</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) is one of the seven stocks I recommended for 2007 (<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/28/you-dont-have-to-be-007-to-find-the-best-picks-for-2007/">check out my original Dec. 28, 2006 post on Home Depoot</a>). So far it is the underperformer in the group, but I have been sticking with it in hopes that there was light at the end of the tunnel. I own an investment company and last year agreed to share some of my experience with AOL readers. </p>
<p>In the past three weeks I have written several stories about The Home Depot that have been read by thousands of customers, shareholders, employees, investors and business people. The high volume of comments that we have received indicate that your enterprise has lost a tremendous amount of goodwill over the past few years and will have to work very hard to regain it. I am sure the downturn in the housing market is having an impact on the company, but no one seems to be cutting you any slack. To put it simply, The Home Depot has made a lot of people very frustrated and angry. I will not repeat what has been said, but hope you will take the time for a few quick reads. I learned quite a bit, maybe you can, too.</p>
<p>I pledged to my readers that I would forward to you the stories with their comments in the hopes that you or someone representing you would take the time to read them and respond. Perhaps some of this has been relayed to you already. Perhaps these comments just mirror what you have already heard directly from customers, employees and shareholders, but if that's true not much has been done that is visible or tangible to those concerned. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/frank-blake-ceo-the-home-depot-and-the-board-of-directors-are-y/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Frank Blake, CEO, The Home Depot &amp; the Board of Directors: Are you listening?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/frank-blake-ceo-the-home-depot-and-the-board-of-directors-are-y/">Frank Blake, CEO, The Home Depot &amp; the Board of Directors: Are you listening?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/frank-blake-ceo-the-home-depot-and-the-board-of-directors-are-y/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/932645/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/03/frank-blake-ceo-the-home-depot-and-the-board-of-directors-are-y/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barron's</category><category>Frank Blake</category><category>FrankBlake</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>The Home Depot (HD)</category><category>The New York Times</category><category>TheHomeDepot(hd)</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><category>TheStreet.com</category><category>Top Picks 2007</category><category>TopPicks2007</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal blocked Dow Jones buyout story]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/the-wall-street-journal-blocked-dow-jones-buy-out-story/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/the-wall-street-journal-blocked-dow-jones-buy-out-story/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/the-wall-street-journal-blocked-dow-jones-buy-out-story/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dj/" rel="tag">Dow Jones and Co (DJ)</a></p><p>The <em>New York Times</em> business editors probably don't like <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>. The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">Dow Jones</a>' (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-and-company-inc/dj/nys">DJ</a>) paper has more resources and usually gets the big news out first.</p>
<p>Odd then that the business section for <em>The Times</em> appears to have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/08/business/media/08journal.html?ref=business">broken the story</a> that the editors at the <em>WSJ </em>were aware of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) bid for Dow Jones long before they reported the information. <em>The New York Times</em> piece on the subject even raises the key question: "What are a news organization's obligations to report important market-moving news about itself or its parent company before the news is officially disclosed?"</p>
<p>Another issue is that it appears that options activity in Dow Jones stock was high ahead of the announcement of the offer. So, someone probably leaked the information. If the <em>Journal</em> had reported the Murdoch offer news when it was received, this might not have happened.</p>
<p>It is an embarrassing moment for Dow Jones. The argument for not letting Mr. Murdoch in is that he might want to influence the news. Murdoch might decide to put his finger on the scales and decide what he wants readers to see.</p>
<p>Well, the editors at <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> can no longer throw stones at Mr. Murdoch and his meddling. They live in a glass house.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/the-wall-street-journal-blocked-dow-jones-buy-out-story/">The Wall Street Journal blocked Dow Jones buyout story</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 May 2007 12:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/08/business/media/08journal.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/the-wall-street-journal-blocked-dow-jones-buy-out-story/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/891127/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/the-wall-street-journal-blocked-dow-jones-buy-out-story/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dj</category><category>dow jones</category><category>DowJones</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>the new york times</category><category>the wall street journal</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><category>TheWallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 12:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bitter sweeteners: Makers of Splenda and Equal stir up in court]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/06/how-sweet-makers-of-splenda-and-equal-duke-it-out-in-court/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/06/how-sweet-makers-of-splenda-and-equal-duke-it-out-in-court/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/06/how-sweet-makers-of-splenda-and-equal-duke-it-out-in-court/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/cubes.jpg" />If you thought that sugar, or rather, what people think of as sugar, was a light and fluffy matter, think again. <em>The New York Times</em> (subscription required) today has a report on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/06/business/media/06sweet.html?_r=1&amp;th=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;emc=th&amp;adxnnlx=1175882581-5jBZ7lTfdridnmB/Ab5lng">ugly court battle going on between the makers of Splenda and Equal</a> over what each says is false advertising.<br /><br />Privately held Marisant Worldwide Inc., which makes Equal, accuses rival Splenda of spending millions of dollars convincing the public that its product is made from sugar and is natural. Splenda contends that its product does indeed start with sugar. So nyaaa.<br /><br />A tiff over language and marketing? More like an argument over who's got the sweetest portion of the market. Equal was number one for a long while, finding its way into thousands of consumer products, as well as being the sweetener used for Diet Pepsi and Diet Coke. But Splenda, made by a unit of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/johnson-and-johns-dc/jnj/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">JNJ</a>), has captured 62% of the $1.5 billion artificial sweetener market since being introduced in 1999. Sweet nothings? Hardly.<br /><br />Expect a chemistry lesson in what goes into the making of these two popular sweeteners. If nothing else, this battle might help publicize what's actually in those little blue and yellow packets, and why you might be just as well off dropping a spoonful of the real stuff into your morning cup.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/06/how-sweet-makers-of-splenda-and-equal-duke-it-out-in-court/">Bitter sweeteners: Makers of Splenda and Equal stir up in court</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/06/how-sweet-makers-of-splenda-and-equal-duke-it-out-in-court/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/868976/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/06/how-sweet-makers-of-splenda-and-equal-duke-it-out-in-court/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Equal</category><category>JNJ</category><category>Splenda</category><category>The New York Times</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Tilsner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspapers are dead? Jack Welch and GateHouse might beg to differ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/newspapers-are-dead-jack-welch-and-gatehouse-might-beg-to-diffe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/newspapers-are-dead-jack-welch-and-gatehouse-might-beg-to-diffe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/newspapers-are-dead-jack-welch-and-gatehouse-might-beg-to-diffe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/boston_globe.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="the boston globe headquarters" />I guess that it's only fitting that in a day where GateHouse Media shares debut in a successful IPO, that we also hear that <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2006/10/25/local_group_may_bid_for_globe/"><em>The Boston Globe</em> might be sold</a>.</p>
<p>GateHouse Media, Inc. (NYSE:GHS), a local newspaper and online publisher, rose 20% in its <a href="http://aolpf5.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?dist=feed&amp;siteid=aolpf&amp;guid={41B0C2D9-88CC-4988-825A-FB595DC01CD5}">market debut</a> today before closing up 17.61%, or $3.17, from its increased pricing of $18 a share. More on GHS IPO <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/gatehouse-media-ipo-today-and-everyone-says-newspapers-are-d/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Today, we also learned of preliminary plans by no other than former General Electric Co. (NYSE:GE) CEO, Jack Welch and advertising exec Jack Connor to buy The Boston Globe from The New York Times Co. (NYSE:NYT).</p>
<p>Investment bank JPMorgan Chase &amp; Co. (NYSE:JPM) helps the two investors with the potential deal. According to some involved in the discussion, JPMorgan has valued the Globe at $550 million to $600 million, well below the $1.1 billion The Times paid for it in 1993. This isn't that surprising since The Globe financial results haven't been stellar to say the least.</p>
<p>Welch and Connor are both Boston residents, which fits the recent trend of returning newspapers to local hands. However, The Times has repeatedly said the The Globe isn't for sale.</p>
<p><em>[<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ckirkman/29427471/">Photo Chris Kirkman</a>]</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/newspapers-are-dead-jack-welch-and-gatehouse-might-beg-to-diffe/">Newspapers are dead? Jack Welch and GateHouse might beg to differ</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boston.com/business/globe/articles/2006/10/25/local_group_may_bid_for_globe/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/newspapers-are-dead-jack-welch-and-gatehouse-might-beg-to-diffe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/691020/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/newspapers-are-dead-jack-welch-and-gatehouse-might-beg-to-diffe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gatehouse</category><category>ghs</category><category>ipo</category><category>jack welch</category><category>JackWelch</category><category>nyt</category><category>the boston globe</category><category>the new york times</category><category>TheBostonGlobe</category><category>TheNewYorkTimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:04:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
