<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Oracle a buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-oracle-a-buy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-oracle-a-buy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-oracle-a-buy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/orcl-oracle-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Earlier in the week, there was an item on a blog at <a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/12/04/oracle-street-trimming-numbers-ahead-of-fy-q2-report/">Barrons.com</a> concerning <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>). It was reported that two analysts revised their earnings estimates for the tech company in the downward direction (shareholders hate that!). Ross MacMillan of Jefferies &amp; Co. took two pennies off his fiscal '09 estimate, reducing it to $1.43 per share. Tim Klasell of Thomas Weisel Partners thinks Oracle will do $1.44 per share; this was likewise a reduction of two pennies. I guess there's something about two pennies and Oracle this week. Both analysts have good ratings on Oracle and think the stock will trade higher from here.</p>
<p>And now, for my own two cents. As far as I'm concerned, I think Oracle is not necessarily a stock to jump into at the moment. The shares have been weak this year (of course, what hasn't been weak this year, I suppose), and at Friday's close of $16.32, they were sitting rather close to their 52-week low of $15.00. I would rather see Oracle pull further away from its low of the year before buying. I've been generally bearish on most stocks in the market, and I have to tell you, the recent rallying mood on Wall Street isn't something I have a lot of belief in. I believe Oracle may end up going lower from here once we get additional negative headlines on the macro environment. If I don't see strength, then I won't buy with any sort of conviction. If I wanted to take on some shares of a tech stock, I'd probably go with stronger brands, like a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), or perhaps even an <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>). Yes, Oracle is a big brand name as well, but I am not too partial to its stock, quite honestly (I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/oracle-beats-the-analysts-impressive-but-id-still-rather-ow/">do respect the company</a>, though). However, even if I bought some Microsoft, my inclination right now would be to sell it the next time it makes a small move higher. In fact, I was trying to get hold of some Microsoft this week for a quick trade, but it just didn't happen.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-oracle-a-buy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Oracle a buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-oracle-a-buy/">Is Oracle a buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/12/04/oracle-street-trimming-numbers-ahead-of-fy-q2-report/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/19/oracle-beats-the-analysts-impressive-but-id-still-rather-ow/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-oracle-a-buy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1393127/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/06/is-oracle-a-buy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>IBM</category><category>jefferies</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Oracle</category><category>ORCL</category><category>Ross MacMillan</category><category>RossMacmillan</category><category>tech</category><category>thomas weisel partners</category><category>ThomasWeiselPartners</category><category>Tim Klasell</category><category>TimKlasell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Thomas Weisel feels the pain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/thomas-weisel-feels-the-pain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/thomas-weisel-feels-the-pain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/thomas-weisel-feels-the-pain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/thomas.jpg" />So far this year, the IPO market has been dormant and M&amp;A has been weak. There are also signs of a drop-off in venture capital fundings.</p>
<p>And all this is weighing on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thomas-weisel-partners-group-inc/twpg/nas">Thomas Weisel Partners Group, Inc.</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thomas-weisel-partners-group-inc/twpg/nas">TWPG</a>), which is a boutique investment bank. In <a href="http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release.do?id=850619">Q1</a>, investment banking revenues fell $11.5 million to $52.8 million. There were only 23 transactions, which compares to 49 in the same period a year ago. What's more, Thomas Weisel posted a loss of $17.8 million, or $0.54 per share.</p>
<p>So, are there any signs of improvement? Not really. Basically, the firm is now hoping that M&amp;A transactions will pickup, as corporate clients realize that it is getting difficult to raise capital.</p>
<p>In light of this, it's no surprise that Thomas Weisel is cutting back. There will be a 13% reduction in headcount. And, keep in mind that -- at the beginning of the year -- the firm had already reduced headcount by 9%. </p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&amp;A Handbook (<a href="http://www.mergerbook.com">www.mergerbook.com</a>) and is also a principal in <a href="http://www.averiware.com/">Averiware</a>, which provides an ERP system to small and midsize businesses.</em></p>
<p><em></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/thomas-weisel-feels-the-pain/">Thomas Weisel feels the pain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 May 2008 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/thomas-weisel-feels-the-pain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1184085/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/01/thomas-weisel-feels-the-pain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ipo market</category><category>IpoMarket</category><category>ma</category><category>Thomas Weisel Partners</category><category>ThomasWeiselPartners</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: Volatility up as AKAM trades near 16-month low into 3Q EPS]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/option-update-10-2-07-volatility-up-as-akam-trades-near-16-mont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/option-update-10-2-07-volatility-up-as-akam-trades-near-16-mont/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/option-update-10-2-07-volatility-up-as-akam-trades-near-16-mont/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/akam/" rel="tag">Akamai Technologies (AKAM)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/akamai-technologies-inc/akam/nas"><strong><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" /></strong>Akamai</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/akamai-technologies-inc/akam/nas">AKAM</a>), offers services for accelerating content and business processes online, is recently up .58 to $29.33. AKAM announced EPS will be reported on 10/24. AKAM call option volume of 17,326 contracts compares to put volume of 4,140 contracts. AKAM October option implied volatility is at 50, November is at 58; above its 26-week average of 45 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price fluctuations.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sunpower-corporation/spwr/nas">SunPower</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sunpower-corporation/spwr/nas">SPWR</a>) designs, develops, manufacturers, and sells solar electric power products, systems, and services. SPWR will report EPS on 10/18. Thomas Weisel Partners-TWPT downgraded SPWR to Makeweight from Overweight on 10/1. TWPT says "investors have been bidding up the shares of SPWR over the last several months on expectations that a Federal Energy Bill will be a boon for the domestic photovoltaic industry." SPWR October call option implied volatility is at 53; puts are at 57, above its 26-week average of 43 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk. </p>
<p><br /><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">theflyonthewall.com.</a></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/option-update-10-2-07-volatility-up-as-akam-trades-near-16-mont/">Option update: Volatility up as AKAM trades near 16-month low into 3Q EPS</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/option-update-10-2-07-volatility-up-as-akam-trades-near-16-mont/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1003624/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/02/option-update-10-2-07-volatility-up-as-akam-trades-near-16-mont/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AKAM</category><category>EPS</category><category>Federal Energy Bill</category><category>FederalEnergyBill</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><category>photovoltaic industry</category><category>PhotovoltaicIndustry</category><category>solar</category><category>solar electric power</category><category>SolarElectricPower</category><category>SPWR</category><category>Thomas Weisel Partners</category><category>ThomasWeiselPartners</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SoundBite wants a piece of the IPO market]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/soundbite-wants-a-piece-of-the-ipo-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/soundbite-wants-a-piece-of-the-ipo-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/soundbite-wants-a-piece-of-the-ipo-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/sound.gif" alt="" />Ever get an automated message on the phone? It's actually a growing industry and is called automated voice messaging, or AVM.<br /><br />A leader in the space is <a href="http://www.soundbite.com">SoundBite Communications</a> and the company has filed for its IPO this week.<br /><br />SoundBite's system is completely Web-based. Thus, customers do not have to invest in IT personnel, hardware, servers and so on. Instead, they pay on a per-message or a per-minute basis.<br /><br />With the service, customers can handle outbound communications like collections, customer care and marketing pitches.<br /><br />In fact, SoundBite's system delivered nearly one billion calls in 2006. And revenues have been ramping - going from $7.8 million in 2004 to $29.1 million in last year. However, the company lost $160,000.<br /><br />Based on a variety of research studies, the AVM market is forecasted to grow from $370 million in 2005 to $1.4 billion in 2010. <br /><br />The underwriters for the IPO include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cowen-group-inc/cown/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Cowen</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cowen-group-inc/cown/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">COWN</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thomas-weisel-partners-group-inc/twpg/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Thomas Weisel Partners </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/thomas-weisel-partners-group-inc/twpg/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">TWPG</a>). The proposed ticker symbol is SDBT.<br /><br />You can also find the IPO <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163698/000095013507002256/b64836s1sv1.htm">filing </a>at the SEC website.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/soundbite-wants-a-piece-of-the-ipo-market/">SoundBite wants a piece of the IPO market</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/soundbite-wants-a-piece-of-the-ipo-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/876078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/17/soundbite-wants-a-piece-of-the-ipo-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cowen</category><category>IPOs</category><category>SoundBite</category><category>Thomas Weisel Partners</category><category>ThomasWeiselPartners</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:12:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
