<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[HootSuite Rakes in Close to $2 Million in New Venture Round]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aol/" rel="tag">AOL (AOL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/hootsuite.jpg" alt="" />The Twitter-verse continues to get interesting. I've always felt that the returns are to be found around <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> rather than with Twitter itself, and the venture capital community seems to be acting from the same position. <a href="http://blog.hootsuite.com/hootsuite-announces-1-9-million-in-financing/" target="_blank">Twitter interaction platform HootSuite just announced a new round of venture capital funding</a>, with $1.9 million in fresh money coming in the door to support its growth efforts.<br /><br />HootSuite, which was started by <a href="http://invokemedia.com/" target="_blank">Invoke Media</a> in November 2008, has evolved into a brand monitoring, file-sharing and social media integration utility. Only a year later, it has attracted more than 300,000 users, from Time (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/MarthaStewart/">Martha Stewart</a> to the White House to Aol (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aol-inc/aol/nys" target="_blank">AOL</a>).BloggingStocks is among the Aol blogs using HootSuite.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>HootSuite Rakes in Close to $2 Million in New Venture Round</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/">HootSuite Rakes in Close to $2 Million in New Venture Round</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19318454/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/15/hootsuite-rakes-in-close-to-2-million-in-new-venture-round/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>AOL</category><category>Apple</category><category>blogs</category><category>blumberg</category><category>facebook</category><category>hearst</category><category>HearstCorp</category><category>hootsuite</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iphone</category><category>linkedin</category><category>LinkedIn.com</category><category>MarthaStewart</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twitter</category><category>twx</category><category>venture capital</category><category>venture capital deals</category><category>VentureCapital</category><category>VentureCapitalDeals</category><category>wordpress</category><category>wordpress.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nsany/" rel="tag">Nissan Motors (NSANY)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/magazine_stand_pinkmoose.jpg" /><em>Vibe</em>, the urban music magazine, is <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=140139" target="_blank">clawing its way back to life</a>. New owners and editors are trying to make the magazine a <strike>success</strike> reality again, and they are making the web a priority ... which shouldn't be news but is for an ailing print industry. </p>
<p>The new editor-in-chief, Jermaine Hall, told <em>AdAge</em> that "Vibe.com is really the hub," and that everything needs to point back to the online presence. The print publication will be just one part of the Vibe Lifestyle Network, a move we're also seeing with the likes of <em>Rolling Stone</em>, where the website is being brought back into the fold (and may actually get some resources).</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/">Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=140139>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19221812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conde nast</category><category>Fred Mwangaguhunga</category><category>general motors</category><category>grm</category><category>intermedia</category><category>Jermaine Hall</category><category>Leonard Burnett Jr.</category><category>magazines</category><category>MediaTakeOut</category><category>music magazines</category><category>new york times</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>nytimes.com</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>print magazines</category><category>print media</category><category>rolling stone</category><category>sean john</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>vibe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time and WSJ to lay off more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/wall_street_journal_240.jpg" alt="" />The mayhem in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/media/">media</a> industry continues. The <a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>, a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">News Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) property, is <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/the_revolving_door/more_business_journalism_layoffs_wall_street_journal_closes_boston_office_141650.asp" target="_blank">closing its Boston bureau and sending nine employees into the wind</a>. The newswire and <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com" target="_blank">MarketWatch</a> operations are going to stay open in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Boston/">Boston</a>, however, with no headcount impact. </p>
<p>The Journal doesn't have any plans to close other offices, according to a memo by managing editor Robert Thomson: "there are no plans, nascent or otherwise, to close any other U.S. or international bureau." The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WSJ/">WSJ</a> will still support an "investigative function" in Boston, but the New York-based Money and Investing team will cover Boston's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> industry, which boasts such heavy hitters as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Fidelity/">Fidelity</a>. </p>
<p>At the same time, magazine company <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/TimeInc/">Time Inc</a>., owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) is looking to cut $100 million in expenses, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> will undoubtedly figure into the equation. The company that owns <a href="http://www.time.com" target="_blank">Time</a>, <a href="http://www.fortune.com" target="_blank">Fortune</a>, <a href="http://www.people.com" target="_blank">People</a> and <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/" target="_blank">Sports Illustrated</a> - and falls under the same umbrella as <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a>, which owns <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com" target="_blank">BloggingStocks</a> - is feeling the squeeze of a media recession that's even worse than the regular recession we've all been battling for what feels like decades. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time and WSJ to lay off more</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/">Time and WSJ to lay off more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>boston.com</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>conde nast</category><category>CondeNast</category><category>cost cutting</category><category>CostCutting</category><category>fortune</category><category>graydon carter</category><category>GraydonCarter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><category>magazine</category><category>magazines</category><category>marketwatch</category><category>mckinsey</category><category>mckinseyco.</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>new york</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corpb nws</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NewsCorporation</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>PeopleMagazine</category><category>SportsIllustrated</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>VanityFair</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can magazines get away with price increases?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/newsstand.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />With circulation declining in large part due to the huge amount of free content available on the internet, some magazine publishers are adopting what seems like a counter-intuitive approach to competing: raising prices.<br /><br />Magazines like <em>Time, Newsweek, Business Week </em>and even the upmarket<em> New Yorker</em> have long relied on low subscription prices to attract large numbers of subscribers, which in turn attracts advertisers. But the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/business/media/13circ.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">reports</a> that <em>The Economist</em> has raised its price substantially of late and is still continuing to buck the trend of declining circulation. That has other publishers taking notice, and many are planning to increase their subscription and newsstand rates, after years of falling prices.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can magazines get away with price increases?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/">Can magazines get away with price increases?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/13/business/media/13circ.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1515137/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/13/can-magazines-get-away-with-price-increases/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>businessWeek</category><category>Economist</category><category>Magazines</category><category>New Yorker</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>NewYorker</category><category>Time</category><category>twmc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Customized magazines: Another dumb idea from a dumb industry]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/customized-magazines-another-dumb-idea-from-a-dumb-industry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/customized-magazines-another-dumb-idea-from-a-dumb-industry/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/customized-magazines-another-dumb-idea-from-a-dumb-industry/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/newsstand.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Time Inc. is planning the launch of an experimental customizable magazine called "mine."<br /><br />The Associated Press <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jhBGhXZb5MqUZfkVsGeNdTOlgLngD970740G0">reports</a> that "The magazine is free, but the print edition is limited to the first 31,000 respondents, while an online version is available for another 200,000." Here's how it works: You pick five titles from a list of <em>Time, Sports Illustrated, Food &amp; Wine, Real Simple, Money, In Style, Golf</em>, and <em>Travel + Leisure</em>. Then "mine" editors decide which stories from each will make it into your customized magazine.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/customized-magazines-another-dumb-idea-from-a-dumb-industry/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Customized magazines: Another dumb idea from a dumb industry</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/customized-magazines-another-dumb-idea-from-a-dumb-industry/">Customized magazines: Another dumb idea from a dumb industry</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jhBGhXZb5MqUZfkVsGeNdTOlgLngD970740G0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/customized-magazines-another-dumb-idea-from-a-dumb-industry/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1491311/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/18/customized-magazines-another-dumb-idea-from-a-dumb-industry/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>magazines</category><category>TIME</category><category>Time Inc.</category><category>TimeInc.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart shoppers: Get your People and Enquirer fix elsewhere]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/walmart-shoppers-get-your-people-and-enquirer-fix-elsewhere/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/walmart-shoppers-get-your-people-and-enquirer-fix-elsewhere/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/walmart-shoppers-get-your-people-and-enquirer-fix-elsewhere/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/newsstand.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />A <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/02042009/business/no_people_at_wal_mart_153421.htm">standoff between</a> two of the nation's largest periodical wholesalers and magazine publishers over a seven-cent surcharge could keep popular celebrity and news magazines out of most <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) outlets this week. Some Walgreen and CVS stores would also be affected. The two wholesalers, Anderson News and Source Interlink Cos, deliver to 3,000 of Wal-Mart's 4,200 stores, and they are charging a seven-cent surcharge per magazine, which publishers like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), Bauer Publications, and American Media refuse to pay. <br /><br />A Wal-Mart spokesperson said that some stores would be without magazines this week, but wouldn't give specifics about titles or the number of stores. However, it was clear that the majority of stores would be affected; and the titles owned by the objecting companies include <em>People</em>,<em> Time</em>, <em>National Enquirer</em>, <em>Star</em>, and<em> Life &amp; Style</em>. Popular celeb titles <em>Us Weekly</em> and <em>OK!</em> were not subject to the standoff.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/walmart-shoppers-get-your-people-and-enquirer-fix-elsewhere/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wal-Mart shoppers: Get your People and Enquirer fix elsewhere</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/walmart-shoppers-get-your-people-and-enquirer-fix-elsewhere/">Wal-Mart shoppers: Get your People and Enquirer fix elsewhere</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/02042009/business/no_people_at_wal_mart_153421.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/walmart-shoppers-get-your-people-and-enquirer-fix-elsewhere/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1450523/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/04/walmart-shoppers-get-your-people-and-enquirer-fix-elsewhere/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>people</category><category>time</category><category>twx</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How much does Time Warner (TWX) have to cut to save margins?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/time-warner-twx-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />When embattled <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CEO Jeff Bewkes gets on the company's fourth quarter earnings call next week, February 4, he will certainly be asked one thing. With the advertising market facing one of its worst periods in years, how does he intend to keep profit margins high? Several of the company's businesses, particularly magazine group Time, Inc., AOL (parent company of BloggingStocks), and the firm's cable networks, rely on advertising for a large portion of their revenue.</p>
<p>Late last year, Time, Inc. cut 600 jobs. AOL <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">just said</a> it would let another 700 people go. No plans have been announced for cable operations like CNN, but those may come.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How much does Time Warner (TWX) have to cut to save margins?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/">How much does Time Warner (TWX) have to cut to save margins?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1444219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/how-much-does-time-warner-twx-have-to-cut-to-save-margins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>CNN</category><category>Inc</category><category>Time</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As US News goes monthly, magazines must face their fate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="US News and World Report " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/usnews.jpg" />US News</em> admitted that the advertising climate and competition from <em>Time</em> and <em>Newsweek</em> was too tough, so after decades as a weekly, it said a while back that it would publish 26 times in 2009. That is a lot of savings in printing and postage. The publication probably let a few people go.</p>
<p>But the magazine never made it to its new publishing frequency. Things are so bad in print advertising that now it says it will go monthly. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/business/media/05mag.html?ref=business">According to</a> <em>The New York Times "</em>Just five months after saying it would drop its frequency to every other week, U.S. News &amp; World Report has decided instead to become a monthly magazine."</p>
<br /><iframe width="205" height="185" frameborder="0" align="left" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1422&amp;view=155277&amp;pollId=155557&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1&amp;popup=yes"></iframe> <iframe width="205" height="205" frameborder="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1422&amp;view=155278&amp;pollId=155558&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1&amp;popup=yes"></iframe> <br clear="all" />
<p>The magazine, which was founded in 1948, might as well fold. Putting out a news publication once a month when the internet allows people to get news minute-by-minute is not a smart idea. There is a good chance the magazine will not be around at the end of next year.</p>
<p>Over the last week, large magazine publishers like Rodale, Time, Inc., and Conde Nast have put a total of over 1,000 people out of work. The magazine industry is beginning to look like the newspaper sector. That means it is trapped without a way out. <br /></p>
<p>As magazine publishers focus more on the internet, they confront competition like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) News and <em>CNN.</em> Even on the web, publishing is too crowded for everyone to make it.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at <a href="http://www.247wallst.com">247WallSt.com</a>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/">As US News goes monthly, magazines must face their fate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/business/media/05mag.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1362628/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/05/as-us-news-goes-monthly-magazines-must-face-their-fate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>110508</category><category>GOOG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>Time</category><category>US News</category><category>UsNews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[USA Today ad revenue in free fall, a nightmare for the future of print]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) announced it May revenue results. Nothing in them was surprising. </p>
<p><a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/gannett-co-inc-releases-may-statistical/rfid113534567">According to</a> the country's largest newspaper company, "Publishing advertising revenues in May were 14.3 percent lower." Classified ad revenue fell even more, almost 20%. Auto, real estate, and jobs marketing have begun to leave newspapers and financial trouble within those industries has cut their ad budgets to the bone.</p>
<p>The most disturbing piece of new is the report was that at <em>USA Today</em>, advertising revenue was 18.4 percent lower on paid ad pages of 260 versus 324 last year.</p>
<p>USA Today is part newspaper, part daily magazine. It uses color and graphics in a way that is closer to <em>Time, Newsweek, or BusinessWeek </em>than to a typical daily paper. It is also a national product, not local like other papers.</p>
<p>If the country's largest paper, and one of only two papers distributed widely in the USA is in such trouble, it may be a sign that the print ad downturn is moving quickly from newspapers to magazines. Some weekly publications like <em>BusinessWeek</em> are seeing double digit ad drops. </p>
<p>Newspapers may not be the last part of the print publication industry to fall apart.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/">USA Today ad revenue in free fall, a nightmare for the future of print</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/gannett-co-inc-releases-may-statistical/rfid113534567>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1228882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/18/usa-today-ad-revenue-in-free-fall-a-nightmare-for-the-future-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BusinessWeek</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazines</category><category>newspapers</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>publishing</category><category>Time</category><category>USA Today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fortune strikes out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><em>Fortune</em>, which shares a parent, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"><strong><font color="#0072bc">Time Warner Inc.</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys"><font color="#0072bc">TWX</font></a>), with <em>BloggingStocks</em>, struck out this week. What I mean is that it published three articles -- each of which I think completely missed the boat. I really like when <em>Fortune </em>gets an in-depth interview with interesting business leaders. But sometimes, it goes too far praising its subjects.</p>
<p>That may have been what happened in the three stories where I think <em>Fortune</em> whiffed:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Providence Equity Partners.</strong> <em>Fortune</em> had a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/13/magazines/fortune/mehta_biggest_deal_ever.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008051908">cover story</a> praising Providence Equity Partners for closing the biggest private equity deal ever. Unfortunately, as I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/is-the-bell-tolling-for-providence-equity-partners-51-billion/">posted</a>, that $52 billion deal fell apart this week. To be fair, <em>Fortune</em> updated its online version of the article with this information. <strong>Strike One</strong>. </li>
    <li><strong>Bernanke saves the day</strong>. <em>Fortune</em> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/22/news/newsmakers/fed.mixed.blessing.fortune/index.htm">posted an article</a> praising Bernanke for stopping the slide in the stock market with his fast interest rate cuts and emergency lending. This week that illusion was burst as the Dow lost 507 points. <strong>Strike Two</strong>. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fortune strikes out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/">Fortune strikes out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 May 2008 17:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1204720/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/23/fortune-strikes-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andy serwer</category><category>AndySerwer</category><category>ben bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>c. k. prahalad</category><category>C.K.Prahalad</category><category>eric von hippel</category><category>EricVonHippel</category><category>fortune</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mit</category><category>provide</category><category>providence equity pa...</category><category>ProvidenceEquityPa...</category><category>providenceequitypart...</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's time for Time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a> ) has been selected as the "undervalued stock of the month" by <strong>Paul Tracy</strong>, in his <a href="http://www.streetauthority.com">StreetAuthority Market Advisor</a>.</p>
<p>The advisor explains, "We think the company's days as an industry laggard are over and we think the company is well-positioned to leverage its valuable assets and unlock shareholder value in the years ahead." </p>
<p>For those unfamiliar with the company's operations, he explains that Time Warner is the largest media conglomerate on the planet. First, he notes, there is AOL, which has built a powerful network of highly-trafficked web sites. He explains, "Its ubiquitous instant messenger service is used to send 1.8 billion messages every day." </p>
<p>Then, he adds, there is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Cable Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWC</a>), which has grown to become the nation's number two cable provider with a massive base of 15 million customers -- roughly half of whom have signed up for premium services such as digital video or high-speed internet. </p>
<p>The film business, he points out, includes Warner Brothers and New Line Cinema, and has "raked in billions" in global box office revenues from blockbuster hits like Harry Potter and The Lord of the Rings. </p>
<p>In fact, he says, Warner Brothers is planning to bring the Harry Potter world to life, unveiling plans to collaborate on a new theme park based on the "wildly popular" series. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's time for Time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/">It's time for Time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/933795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/05/it-s-time-for-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>cnn</category><category>harry potter</category><category>hbo</category><category>lord of the rings</category><category>media conglomerates</category><category>media stocks</category><category>new line cinema</category><category>NewLineCinema</category><category>paul tracy</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>streetauthority market advisor</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tnt</category><category>twx</category><category>warner brothers</category><category>warner home video</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner may yet take Carl Icahn's advice]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/27/time-warner-may-yet-take-carl-icahns-advice/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/27/time-warner-may-yet-take-carl-icahns-advice/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/27/time-warner-may-yet-take-carl-icahns-advice/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iaci/" rel="tag">IAC/InterActiveCorp (IACI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys/charts?dr=999">Time Warner Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys/charts?dr=999">TWX</a>) may yet take Carl Icahn's advice, according to<a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/26/more-talk-of-a-time-warner-revamp/"> Wall Street analysts</a>.</p>
<p>Spencer Wang of Bear Stearns suggested yesterday that Time Warner was contemplating a "strategic event" for AOL, according to <em>The New York Times</em>'s DealBook blog. UBS analyst Aryeh Burkhoff said that chances of an AOL sale are "high," the blog reported. Another possibility raised by analysts is a disposal of the Time Inc. magazine publishing business, Dealbook said.</p>
<p>Chief Executive Richard Parsons has called AOL a strategic asset. Companies, though, often say nice things about assets they plan to sell.</p>
<p>If AOL gets sold -- and it wouldn't shock me if it happened -- the usual suspects, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas/charts?timeframe=0&amp;freq=1&amp;state=1&amp;te=mountain&amp;vs1=on&amp;dv1=off&amp;dr=999&amp;hs1=on&amp;ss=on&amp;ss1=on&amp;vs=on&amp;settings=1&amp;tabs=charts&amp;scs=0&amp;vl=on&amp;daysb4=0&amp;hs=on&amp;vl1=on&amp;se=default">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas/charts?timeframe=0&amp;freq=1&amp;state=1&amp;te=mountain&amp;vs1=on&amp;dv1=off&amp;dr=999&amp;hs1=on&amp;ss=on&amp;ss1=on&amp;vs=on&amp;settings=1&amp;tabs=charts&amp;scs=0&amp;vl=on&amp;daysb4=0&amp;hs=on&amp;vl1=on&amp;se=default">GOOG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/nys">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/nys">MSFT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas/charts?timeframe=0&amp;freq=1&amp;state=1&amp;te=mountain&amp;vs1=on&amp;dv1=off&amp;dr=999&amp;hs1=on&amp;ss=on&amp;ss1=on&amp;vs=on&amp;settings=1&amp;tabs=charts&amp;scs=0&amp;vl=on&amp;daysb4=0&amp;hs=on&amp;vl1=on&amp;se=default">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas/charts?timeframe=0&amp;freq=1&amp;state=1&amp;te=mountain&amp;vs1=on&amp;dv1=off&amp;dr=999&amp;hs1=on&amp;ss=on&amp;ss1=on&amp;vs=on&amp;settings=1&amp;tabs=charts&amp;scs=0&amp;vl=on&amp;daysb4=0&amp;hs=on&amp;vl1=on&amp;se=default">YHOO</a>) and Barry Diller's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iaci/nys">IAC/InterActiveCorp</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/iaci/nys">IACI</a>) would take a look at it. The Time business would probably fall into the hands of a private equity outfit.</p>
<p>All of this should have a familiar ring to it. Icahn made many of these same points during his recent crusade against Time Warner management.</p>
<p>One interesting question: What to call the company if Time is sold? I hope Parsons chooses a historic name highlighting the company's connection to Warner Bros. The world doesn't need yet another quasi-Latin sounding corporate name that no one understands. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/27/time-warner-may-yet-take-carl-icahns-advice/">Time Warner may yet take Carl Icahn's advice</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/03/26/more-talk-of-a-time-warner-revamp/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/27/time-warner-may-yet-take-carl-icahns-advice/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/860784/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/27/time-warner-may-yet-take-carl-icahns-advice/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acqusitions</category><category>aol</category><category>mergers</category><category>richard parsons</category><category>RichardParsons</category><category>time</category><category>warner bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time magazine's facelift]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/time-magazines-facelift/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/time-magazines-facelift/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/time-magazines-facelift/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trb/" rel="tag">Tribune Co. (TRB)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/time.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" /><em>Time</em> magazine is debuting on shelves across the nation with its new look and its new streamlined layout. The magazine will not only have larger headlines and more photos, but more bullet points and visual aides too with the goal of showing a different aspect of stories than its traditional longer articles. Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>), the magazine's parent, has already cut jobs in the Time unit and is planning more cuts in an effort to improve the magazine operations. Time magazine is one of the magazines Time Warner is keeping, even after its recent magazine sales.<br /><br />Time is also going to have more cross promotional activities in print to online and vice versa, or so the previews have indicated. The overall comparisons can't be made yet because, well, the future hasn't happened. Old Media has definitely been making attempts to be hipper and more aggressive compared to years past. <br /><br />Web 2.0 is something that Old Media companies have had to embrace whether they liked it or not. If you don't agree, go ask Tribune Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TRB</a>) and other newspaper and broadcast companies about their focus over the last 18 months. All of them will say it has been on capitalizing off the internet while trying to maintain traditional media operations with each company having a different focus such as user-generated content (blogs or video), online ad sales, print exclusives, online exclusives and the like. <br /><br />This is not the first change in media by a long shot, but it does mark a strategic change that you can bet every other media company is watching closely. <br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a partner in 24/7 Wall St., LLC; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/time-magazines-facelift/">Time magazine's facelift</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/time-magazines-facelift/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/854113/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/16/time-magazines-facelift/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>TIME</category><category>time magazine</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeMagazine</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>trb</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner rewarded as it makes more media purchases]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/time-warner-rewarded-as-it-makes-more-media-purchases/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/time-warner-rewarded-as-it-makes-more-media-purchases/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/time-warner-rewarded-as-it-makes-more-media-purchases/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p>Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) is seeing another strong trading day after the company has made a couple investments in old media and new media.<br /><br />Time Warner's Warner Bros. Entertainment unit is taking a 10.3% stake in SCi Entertainment Group plc in the United Kingdom. SCi is a leading publisher and developer of video games, and parent of Eidos, which is known for its Tomb Raider gaming franchise. Terms were not disclosed, but the Warner-SCi agreement also contemplates licensing and distribution of games based on select Warner Bros. Entertainment properties.<br /><br />Turner Broadcasting paid $235 million to Claxson Interactive to buy seven pay TV networks in Latin America with what is said to be a 51 million member audience. It is buying Fashion TV, HTV, Infinito, I.Sat, MuchMusic, Retro and Space. Turner will also get sales representation rights for third party-owned networks in Latin America.<br /><br />Neither one of these deals will be easy to calculate as making a significant difference on their own as far as how they impact earnings. But they are yet another demonstration that the company is still making deals when it sees a fit. TWX shares are up another .1% at $21.74 as of 3:20 p.m. today.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/time-warner-rewarded-as-it-makes-more-media-purchases/">Time Warner rewarded as it makes more media purchases</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/time-warner-rewarded-as-it-makes-more-media-purchases/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/719413/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/time-warner-rewarded-as-it-makes-more-media-purchases/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>Time</category><category>TV</category><category>video games</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time's non-core magazine sale stalls]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/times-non-core-magazine-sale-stalls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/times-non-core-magazine-sale-stalls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/times-non-core-magazine-sale-stalls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>Time Inc's sale of 18 non-core magazine titles has stalled. According to a report in <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=113611">Advertising Age</a>, potential bidders did not get enough information to make the November deadline. Hopes for a sale before year-end have been dashed. The next round of bids are said to be in early January. </p>
<p>Another issue of concern: The delay gives employees at these titles, understandably worried about their futures, more time to look for other jobs. Thus, the staff of any given magazine could be significantly different on execution of any deal. </p>
<p>The Street doesn't seem to care, however. Shares of Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX) are up 0.5% as of 3:20 p.m. today to $20.58.<br /><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/times-non-core-magazine-sale-stalls/">Time's non-core magazine sale stalls</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=113611>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/times-non-core-magazine-sale-stalls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/713033/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/05/times-non-core-magazine-sale-stalls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>magazine sale</category><category>MagazineSale</category><category>time</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
