<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Buying the action in biotech]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/buying-the-action-in-biotech/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/buying-the-action-in-biotech/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/buying-the-action-in-biotech/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dna/" rel="tag">Genentech Inc (DNA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gild/" rel="tag">Gilead Sciences (GILD)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/pills.jpg" /><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville </a>Contributor Steve Smith.</em>
<p>Pharmaceuticals have been alive and merging. The most recent deal is this morning's news that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gilead-sciences-inc/gild/nas"><strong>Gilea</strong></a>d (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gilead-sciences-inc/gild/nas">GILD</a>)  wants <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cv-therapeutics-inc/cvtx/nas"><strong>CV Therapeutics</strong></a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cv-therapeutics-inc/cvtx/nas">CVTX</a>), which comes on the heals Roche's purchase of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genentech-inc/dna/nys"><strong>Genentech</strong></a>(NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genentech-inc/dna/nys">DNA</a>)  and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys"><strong>Merck's</strong></a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc/mrk/nys">MRK</a>) proposed merger with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/schering-plough-corporation/sgp/nys"><strong>Schering Plough</strong></a>(NYSE:<a href="http://SGP">SGP</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/buying-the-action-in-biotech/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Buying the action in biotech</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/buying-the-action-in-biotech/">Buying the action in biotech</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/buying-the-action-in-biotech/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1486341/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/12/buying-the-action-in-biotech/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>biib</category><category>celg</category><category>cvtx</category><category>dna</category><category>gild</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Minyanville</category><category>mrk</category><category>sgp</category><category>Todd Harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UBS making up for lost time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/ubs-making-up-for-lost-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/ubs-making-up-for-lost-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/ubs-making-up-for-lost-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/ubs-ubs-logo.jpg" alt="" /><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Minyan Peter.</em><br /><br />This morning <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-switzerland/ubs/nys"><strong>UBS</strong> (NYSE: UBS)</a> reported that it was amending its 2008 financial statements to increase the prior period loss by another Sf 1.1 billion. <br /><br />I would remind readers that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"><strong>Citigroup</strong> (NYSE: C)</a> did the same thing at the end February when it "booked" an incremental $9.6 billion charge for goodwill impairment in its 2008 results. And there have been several other situations where, with hindsight, financial institutions have adjusted their 2008 results lower (versus their initial earnings releases) prior to filing their 10-K's with the SEC.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/ubs-making-up-for-lost-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UBS making up for lost time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/ubs-making-up-for-lost-time/">UBS making up for lost time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/ubs-making-up-for-lost-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1485325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/11/ubs-making-up-for-lost-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>minyanville</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><category>ubs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[L-3 Communication: A stock to watch in the defense sector]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/stock-to-watch-in-the-defense-sector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/stock-to-watch-in-the-defense-sector/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/stock-to-watch-in-the-defense-sector/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/airplane_usairways.jpg" /><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Fil Zucchi.</em><br />
<p>To highlight defense names in the face of the current spending priorities feels like soaking in gasoline and walking around smoking a cigarette. With that visual as a backdrop, it is also fair to say that Obama is probably just as focused on protecting the motherland as Bush was, and, much as he may dislike it, that will force continued if not increased spending in certain areas of defense. The one name I have been drooling over for years and which is finally coming together in many respects is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/l-3-communications-holdings-inc/lll/nys"><strong>L-3 Communication</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/l-3-communications-holdings-inc/lll/nys">LLL</a>).<br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/stock-to-watch-in-the-defense-sector/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>L-3 Communication: A stock to watch in the defense sector</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/stock-to-watch-in-the-defense-sector/">L-3 Communication: A stock to watch in the defense sector</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/stock-to-watch-in-the-defense-sector/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1479898/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/05/stock-to-watch-in-the-defense-sector/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>communications</category><category>defense</category><category>fil zucchi</category><category>FilZucchi</category><category>lll</category><category>minyanville</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[An interesting trend in the Dow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/01/an-interesting-trend-in-the-dow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/01/an-interesting-trend-in-the-dow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/01/an-interesting-trend-in-the-dow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-2-american-investor-200cm121808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post was written by </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com"><em>Minyanville</em></a><em> contributor Jason Goepfert.</em></p>
<p>Regarding an observation I saw on the<strong> </strong>Dow's six straight losses, I show it's happened roughly every 20 years since 1896.</p>
<p>The last occurrence wasn't that long ago, September 2002, though a couple of those months were just barely negative and may actually show a positive return depending on who your data vendor is.</p>
<p>Anyway, what I think is interesting is that the Dow's performance after the others was mixed when looking out one to three months -- sometimes up, sometimes down. After six months, only two of the six were positive and the average risk during those six months was -11%, compared to an average reward of +8%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/01/an-interesting-trend-in-the-dow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>An interesting trend in the Dow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/01/an-interesting-trend-in-the-dow/">An interesting trend in the Dow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/01/an-interesting-trend-in-the-dow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1473953/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/01/an-interesting-trend-in-the-dow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2002</category><category>djia</category><category>dow</category><category>jason goepfert</category><category>minyanville</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>trends</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nationalization on demand]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/nationalization-on-demand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/nationalization-on-demand/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/nationalization-on-demand/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/frogs-in-bucket.jpg" /><em>This post was written by <strong><a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a></strong> contributor Minyan Peter.</em><br /><br />I have been asked whether there was anything in Chairman Bernanke's speech yesterday that changed my outlook on the prospects of nationalization for some of our largest financial institutions. In a word "no". <br /><br />From my perspective, all Chairman Bernanke did was to confirm Monday's Joint Statement from the bank which offered that what the Government was hoping to implement were "temporary capital buffers" "to provide a cushion against larger than expected future losses, should they occur due to a more severe economic environment, and to support lending to creditworthy borrowers." And that the Government's security of choice would be "mandatory convertible preferred shares."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/nationalization-on-demand/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nationalization on demand</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/nationalization-on-demand/">Nationalization on demand</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/nationalization-on-demand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1471318/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/25/nationalization-on-demand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernanke</category><category>capital</category><category>economy</category><category>fed</category><category>minyanville</category><category>nationalization</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Not taking the MasterCard trade: Priceless]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/not-taking-the-mastercard-trade-priceless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/not-taking-the-mastercard-trade-priceless/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/not-taking-the-mastercard-trade-priceless/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Smita Sadana.</em></p>
<p>On 2/2, a trading buddy asked me if I would short <strong>MasterCard</strong> (MA); reason being that <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/buzz/bookmark.php?id=100620&amp;s=m&amp;context=search&amp;chars=1">financials are looking weak</a> and MA has reached 50-day moving average which could act as a possible resistance and might turn the stock down. </p>
<p>My reply was a unequivocal NO, I wouldn't short MA. Here were the reasons. </p>
<p>1) Financials are weak, down 11% from the high; but notice that MA has not given way. Reaching 50-day moving average is another sign of strength. I don't engage in horse racing, but placing a bet that a strong horse among a group of weak horses will lose, didn't seem right to me! </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/not-taking-the-mastercard-trade-priceless/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Not taking the MasterCard trade: Priceless</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/not-taking-the-mastercard-trade-priceless/">Not taking the MasterCard trade: Priceless</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/not-taking-the-mastercard-trade-priceless/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1451382/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/05/not-taking-the-mastercard-trade-priceless/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ma</category><category>mastercard</category><category>minyanville</category><category>smita sadana</category><category>SmitaSadana</category><category>technicals</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[SanDisk in the breach]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/sandisk-in-the-breach/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/sandisk-in-the-breach/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/sandisk-in-the-breach/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sndk/" rel="tag">SanDisk Corp (SNDK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" height="200" border="0" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/sandisk_logo_.jpg" alt="" />This post was written by </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com"><em>Minyanville</em></a><em> contributor Bill Feingold.</em></p>
<p>With <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas">SanDisk</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas">SNDK</a>) -- which turned down a $26 per share bid from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/samsung-electronics-co-ltd/ssnlf/nao">Samsung</a> last fall -- now talking about raising equity at well below half that price, I think shareholders are going to be beyond irate. In what appears to be one of the great breaches of fiduciary duty of all time, management belittled Samsung for being opportunistic, trying to take advantage of a depressed stock price. <br /><br />Funny, I thought that once you go public, you have made a deal that you are willing to accept the market's opinion of your value. I guess Sandisk's management somehow acquired immunity and forgot to tell everyone else. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/sandisk-in-the-breach/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>SanDisk in the breach</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/sandisk-in-the-breach/">SanDisk in the breach</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/sandisk-in-the-breach/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448807/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/sandisk-in-the-breach/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill feingold</category><category>BillFeingold</category><category>convertibles</category><category>samsung</category><category>sandisk</category><category>sndk</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chipmaker earnings and other top tech news]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/chipmaker-earnings-and-other-top-tech-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/chipmaker-earnings-and-other-top-tech-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/chipmaker-earnings-and-other-top-tech-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/qcom/" rel="tag">QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brcm/" rel="tag">Broadcom Corp'A' (BRCM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/brcm-broadcom-logo.jpg" /><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Sean Udall.</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/broadcom-corporation/brcm/nas">Broadcom</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/broadcom-corporation/brcm/nas">BRCM</a>) <a href="http://www.marketintelligencecenter.com/articles/752522">reports tonight</a> and it is getting hit due to the poor report from <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas">Qualcomm</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas">QCOM</a>). QCOM lowered guidance quite a bit -- in fact, enough that I likely may not have to worry much about QCOM for the next couple quarters. Low $30's would present solid value. <br /><br />Getting back to BRCM, I still feel it is one of the few must own chip names. I think it has enough innovation and diversification to avoid the 35-40% sequential reductions I am seeing from many in the chip space. However, I also think a lowering of the bar is priced into BRCM's shares and anything less than a disaster should keep the stock above $16.50 (assuming we avoid another shock down to the whole market). Anything around that level ($16.50) and lower would have me adding the shares. I've taken gains recently in trading shares and am hoping to add BRCM back on just a bit more weakness. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/chipmaker-earnings-and-other-top-tech-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chipmaker earnings and other top tech news</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/chipmaker-earnings-and-other-top-tech-news/">Chipmaker earnings and other top tech news</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/chipmaker-earnings-and-other-top-tech-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1444733/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/29/chipmaker-earnings-and-other-top-tech-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>brcm</category><category>broadcom</category><category>cavm</category><category>ctxs</category><category>featured</category><category>mlnx</category><category>qcom</category><category>qualcomm</category><category>sean udall</category><category>SeanUdall</category><category>spwra</category><category>sunpower</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><category>vmw</category><category>vmware</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newmont strikes a deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/newmont-strikes-a-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/newmont-strikes-a-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/newmont-strikes-a-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nem/" rel="tag">Newmont Mining (NEM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/nem-newmont-mining-logo.jpg" /><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Lance Lewis.</em>
<p>Just after the close yesterday, <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newmont-mining-corp-holding-co/nem/nys">Newmont Mining</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newmont-mining-corp-holding-co/nem/nys">NEM</a>) guided up 2009 production and guided 2009 cash costs lower. NEM also announced that it would be purchasing the remaining interest in its majority owned Boddington Mine from <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anglogold-ashanti-limited/au/nys">Anglogold Ashanti</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/anglogold-ashanti-limited/au/nys">AU</a>) (which equates to 6.6 mln reserve ounces). That's an increase of 8 percent in NEM's Proven &amp; Probable (P&amp;P) reserves at a price tag of $1.2 bln, which will be raised via an equity offering of 19 mln shares. <br /><br />Based on NEM's 441 mln shares outstanding, we're looking at dilution of just over 4 percent. Thus, in theory, the deal is not even dilutive, given the 8 percent increase in P&amp;P reserves that the company is acquiring with only a 4 percent dilution in equity. Based on what I have seen so far, this looks like a spectacular deal for NEM. <br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/newmont-strikes-a-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newmont strikes a deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/newmont-strikes-a-deal/">Newmont strikes a deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/newmont-strikes-a-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1443363/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/28/newmont-strikes-a-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>anglogold ashanti</category><category>AnglogoldAshanti</category><category>au</category><category>baa</category><category>banro</category><category>gold</category><category>gss</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lance lewis</category><category>LanceLewis</category><category>mergers</category><category>mfn</category><category>minefielders</category><category>nem</category><category>new gold</category><category>NewGold</category><category>newmont mining</category><category>NewmontMining</category><category>nothgate minerals</category><category>NothgateMinerals</category><category>nxg</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banro (BAA): A golden stock]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/banro-baa-a-golden-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/banro-baa-a-golden-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/banro-baa-a-golden-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nem/" rel="tag">Newmont Mining (NEM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Lance Lewis.</em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/banro-corporation/baa/ase">Banro</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/banro-corporation/baa/ase">BAA</a>) jumped 13% yesterday after the company announced that it had finally completed its bankable feasibility study on its Twangiza project and proved up nearly 4 mln ounces of its 10 mln ounce resource. Thus, we can now calculate an NAV for BAA. <br /><br />BAA has no debt. So, assuming $1,000 gold, 3.67 mln ounces of Proven &amp; Probable reserves, an average cash cost of $429 per ounce over the life of the mine (which is based on the feasibility study), and the estimated $410 mln required for cap ex, we get an NAV of almost $15 a share (which gives zero value to the company's current cash balance of around $20 mln and its remaining 5.6 mln ounce resource at Twangiza, not to mention the resource estimates at its other properties). <br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/banro-baa-a-golden-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Banro (BAA): A golden stock</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/banro-baa-a-golden-stock/">Banro (BAA): A golden stock</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/banro-baa-a-golden-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1442115/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/banro-baa-a-golden-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baa</category><category>banro</category><category>commodities</category><category>gold</category><category>lance lewis</category><category>LanceLewis</category><category>metals</category><category>mining</category><category>minyanville</category><category>nem</category><category>newmont</category><category>newmont mining</category><category>NewmontMining</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Institutional toe dipping with HES, RIMM and VMW]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/institutional-toe-dipping-with-hes-rimm-and-vmw/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/institutional-toe-dipping-with-hes-rimm-and-vmw/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/institutional-toe-dipping-with-hes-rimm-and-vmw/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Jeffrey Cooper.</em><br /><br />Institutions may not be chasing stock but there certainly seems to be a bid for select names when they gaped lower this week. <br /><br />Names on my radar that  have seen opening prices scooped up include <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hess-corporation/hes/nys">Hess</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hess-corporation/hes/nys">HES</a>) and <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">Research in Motion</a></strong> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) and <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vmware-inc/vmw/nys">VMWare</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vmware-inc/vmw/nys">VMW</a>) this morning. <br /><br />Often times institutions will sell 10,000 shares or so when they want to buy 500,000 to test the waters. They are complacent and feel they have time to accumulate, than there is no rush. When this 'complacency' as to buying reverses course it will show up in a more persistent steadier rally phase -- a change in character in the advance when it comes. <br /><br />In other words, often times institutions will sell a small block of 10,000 shares when they actually want to buy size in order to bring the price down; i.e., bang 'em to buy 'em. They bang em to bring the price down to a more attractive level to keep momentum players away in order to actually buy quantity at a preferred level. Once we observe that they do not take the time to do this (which shows up in backing and filling action) it will show up in more sustained buying pressure and equate with a lack of buyside complacency.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/institutional-toe-dipping-with-hes-rimm-and-vmw/">Institutional toe dipping with HES, RIMM and VMW</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/institutional-toe-dipping-with-hes-rimm-and-vmw/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1438891/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/institutional-toe-dipping-with-hes-rimm-and-vmw/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>hes</category><category>hess</category><category>institutions</category><category>inthenews</category><category>research in motion</category><category>ResearchInMotion</category><category>rimm</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><category>vmw</category><category>vmware</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The bank shot]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/the-bank-shot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/the-bank-shot/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/the-bank-shot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>The dismantling of the financial stocks is mind-boggling but not entirely unexpected. Last year, <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/articles/BKX-asia-CHINA-jpm-KO-Credit/index/a/19466">we discussed the need for culpability</a> to extend throughout the societal spectrum, from borrowers who over-extended on their credit to the institutions that financially engineered risk to policy makers who were compliant by acceptance. <br /><br />The fact that many of these names are going to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) is perhaps the healthiest possible scenario through the lens of "taking medicine as a function of time and price." It is, however, massively unfortunate for the employees who simply followed marching orders. <br /><br />We're talking livelihoods lost here. Life savings evaporated. Careers ruined. <br /><br />Therein lies the "other side" of the aforementioned "healthy" scenario: societal and structural implications. We've talked about the former ad naseum so I don't think we need to beat that horse. On the structural side -- and something to keep in mind for those calling for the heads of financial professionals -- is the fact that if there isn't incentive for people to fix the system, it simply won't get fixed. <br /><br />Incentive on Wall Street equals money. The industry will be austere and ripe with humility, mind you, but we must find our way to a healthy supply-demand and a balanced give-and-take. For if we don't crack the code in short order, we risk that our capital market structure will cease to exist altogether.<br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/the-bank-shot/">The bank shot</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/the-bank-shot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1430543/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/the-bank-shot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>financials</category><category>fnm</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cautious research note crimps Apollo (APOL) flight]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/cautious-research-note-crimps-apollo-apol-flight/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/cautious-research-note-crimps-apollo-apol-flight/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/cautious-research-note-crimps-apollo-apol-flight/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ainv/" rel="tag">Apollo Investment (AINV)</a></p><p><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Smita Sadana.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apollo-group-inc/apol/nas">Apollo Group</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apollo-group-inc/apol/nas">APOL</a>) was enjoying a bump in price after reporting earnings that were well above estimates, based in increased enrollments. Of course, one can argue that people would go back to school for skill enhancement in these tough recessionary times.</p>
<p>However, two days after that stunning gain, APOL is off 4.9% to $82.55, on a cautious research note from Citron Research, who argue that "<a href="http://www.citronresearch.com/index.php/2009/01/13/citron-releases-the-document-that-the-apollo-group-nasdaqapol-does-not-want-you-or-the-us-government-to-see/">this growth is a one time bump</a>."</p>
<p>While I do not endorse any such research or base my trading primarily on it, I am taking note of the negative reaction on double the average volume.</p>
<p>The stock can certainly come in a little and reduce the distance from its 200-day moving average, which is 38% at the current levels. While not at an extreme, it is unusual in this market to find stocks which are trading so far out.</p>
<p>I'm seeing various levels of support on the APOL chart and they range from $75 to $79.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/cautious-research-note-crimps-apollo-apol-flight/">Cautious research note crimps Apollo (APOL) flight</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/cautious-research-note-crimps-apollo-apol-flight/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1428323/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/cautious-research-note-crimps-apollo-apol-flight/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apol</category><category>apollo</category><category>earnings</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>smita sadana</category><category>SmitaSadana</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Stuff' stocks look cheap?: Caterpillar, Freeport McMoRan, PACCAR]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/stuff-stocks-look-cheap-caterpillar-freeport-mcmoran-paccar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/stuff-stocks-look-cheap-caterpillar-freeport-mcmoran-paccar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/stuff-stocks-look-cheap-caterpillar-freeport-mcmoran-paccar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cat/" rel="tag">Caterpillar (CAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fcx/" rel="tag">Freep't McMoRan Copper (FCX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a></p><p><em>This post was written by <a href="http://www.minyanville.com">Minyanville</a> contributor Vitaliy Katsenelson.</em></p>
<p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/caterpillar.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />"You should buy <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/freeport-mcmoran-copper-and-gold-inc/fcx/nys">Freeport McMoRan</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/freeport-mcmoran-copper-and-gold-inc/fcx/nys">FCX</a>), <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">Caterpillar</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caterpillar-incorporated/cat/nys">CAT</a>), <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/paccar-inc/pcar/nas">PACCAR</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/paccar-inc/pcar/nas">PCAR</a>)." That is what I hear from friends of mine, who are in the biz, all the time. They tell me how cheap these stocks are -- three, six, eight times earnings. "You are a value guy! How come you are not loading up on them?" they ask. </p>
<p>Let me tell you when I'll buy "stuff" stocks (if I ever do, because I've never really cared for the cyclicality of that business). It's when everyone stops telling me how cheap they are and that they are "buys." </p>
<p>These stocks are very similar to housing stocks two years ago: housing stocks were down 50% and looked cheap. Value managers bought just to see their stocks get cut in half again and again. </p>
<p>One needs to subnormalize earnings in this environment for all stocks, but stuff stocks need to see their earnings to be "sub-sub-sub-sub normalized."<a href="http://www.minyanville.com/buzz/bookmark.php?id=94723&amp;s=m&amp;context=search&amp;chars=1" target="_blank"> I've said it before, but it is worth repeating</a>: the global economy just started its journey into a recession, and demand for stuff will drop off the cliff most likely to a lot greater degree than anyone imagines. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/stuff-stocks-look-cheap-caterpillar-freeport-mcmoran-paccar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Stuff' stocks look cheap?: Caterpillar, Freeport McMoRan, PACCAR</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/stuff-stocks-look-cheap-caterpillar-freeport-mcmoran-paccar/">'Stuff' stocks look cheap?: Caterpillar, Freeport McMoRan, PACCAR</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/stuff-stocks-look-cheap-caterpillar-freeport-mcmoran-paccar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1382945/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/stuff-stocks-look-cheap-caterpillar-freeport-mcmoran-paccar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cat</category><category>caterpillar</category><category>fcx</category><category>freeport mcmoran</category><category>freeport-mcmoran</category><category>FreeportMcmoran</category><category>inthenews</category><category>paccar</category><category>pcar</category><category>stocks</category><category>stuff stocks</category><category>StuffStocks</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><category>vitaliy katsenelson</category><category>VitaliyKatsenelson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Emerging strength in networking stocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/emerging-strength-in-networking-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/emerging-strength-in-networking-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/emerging-strength-in-networking-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><em>This post was written by </em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.minyanville.com/"><font color="#888888"><em>Minyanville</em></font></a><em> contributor Sean Udall.</em><em></em></p>
<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netlogic-microsystems-inc/netl/nas">Net Logic Microsystems, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/netlogic-microsystems-inc/netl/nas">NETL</a>), like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cavium-networks-inc/cavm/nas">Cavium Networks, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cavium-networks-inc/cavm/nas">CAVM</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1977567/">reported good enough numbers to really push the stock meaningfully higher today</a>. Generally speaking high end and edge networking are holding up as well as any area in technology. Later this quarter we get to hear <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco Systems, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>), who sounded the first alarm late last year. <br /><br />To get a solid continuation of this networking emerging strength (fundamentally), we will need to hear something like this from CSCO later this quarter. "While sluggish conditions were exacerbated by the credit turmoil hitting the financial enterprise segment, we are standing by our prior assessment and feel the growth of the intelligent network and the profound growth in video traffic will still result in a relatively short downturn. Further, while we cannot tell with certainty, we feel we could see better order rates resuming in the first half of 2009." <br /><br />A statement like that combined with some credit fuel and the networking group may again be one of the better performing sub-groups in tech.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/emerging-strength-in-networking-stocks/">Emerging strength in networking stocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/emerging-strength-in-networking-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1356749/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/29/emerging-strength-in-networking-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cavm</category><category>csco</category><category>netl</category><category>technology</category><category>Todd Harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should the government have let AIG fail?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/should-the-government-have-let-aig-fail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/should-the-government-have-let-aig-fail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/should-the-government-have-let-aig-fail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/todd_harrison.jpg" alt="" />Minyanville contributor Sean Udall dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com/"><font color="#888888"><em>www.minyanville.com</em></font></a><em>.</em></p>
<p><em></em></p>
<ul>
    <li>We're gonna have French Toast for breakfast, French Fries for lunch and French Poodles for dinner in honor of our most recent socialist step. This is a historic juncture in the history of the world, as we edge through interesting times.<br /><br /></li>
    <li><a href="http://www.minyanville.com/mvtv/?p=9&amp;preview=1&amp;videoid=399"><strong>I spoke about this on CNBC in 2003</strong></a> -- yes, I had more hair and less chin -- and felt like I was screaming about a monster nobody yet saw. Now granted, I was five years early and there were a LOT of opportunities between then and now but "socialism," "stagflation" and the perils of <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">Fannie Mae</a> </strong>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys">FNM</a>) were officially flagged.<br /><br /></li>
    <li><strong><em>Why do I highlight this?</em></strong> Simple -- the issues existed five years ago and have cumulatively built since, percolating under the system, growing in magnitude, magnifying in consequence. That's why there isn't a single, simple solution.<br /><br /></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/should-the-government-have-let-aig-fail/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should the government have let AIG fail?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/should-the-government-have-let-aig-fail/">Should the government have let AIG fail?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/should-the-government-have-let-aig-fail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1316667/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/17/should-the-government-have-let-aig-fail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aig</category><category>citi</category><category>citigroup</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>fnm</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[US Airways Opens Issuance Window for Stock]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/us-airways-opens-issuance-window-for-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/us-airways-opens-issuance-window-for-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/us-airways-opens-issuance-window-for-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/todd_harrison.jpg" />Minyanville Professor Minyan Peter dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com/"><font color="#888888"><em>www.minyanville.com</em></font></a><em>.</em></p>
<p>As many people have heard before, there are only two times a company issues common stock: When it absolutely has to or when it is stupid not to.<br /><br />Well yesterday's issuance by <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-airways-group-inc-new/lcc/nys">US Airways</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/us-airways-group-inc-new/lcc/nys">LCC</a>) may represent that once in a lifetime opportunity to see those seemingly contradictory principles in action at the same time. Having seen its stock trade at $1.45 not a month ago, $8.50 must seem pretty sweet to US Airways management, particularly with strong technical resistance at $10.00 providing a pretty strong ceiling above. <br /><br />With airline stocks trading as the most leveraged play on the price declines in <strong>oil</strong>, I can understand why US Airways management took advantage of the window being open to issue stock. But just because the issuance window is open, doesn't mean investors should jump.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/us-airways-opens-issuance-window-for-stock/">US Airways Opens Issuance Window for Stock</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/us-airways-opens-issuance-window-for-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1285799/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/15/us-airways-opens-issuance-window-for-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>lcc</category><category>oil</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><category>us airways</category><category>UsAirways</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 14:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Applied Materials' upside surprise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/applied-materials-upside-surprise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/applied-materials-upside-surprise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/applied-materials-upside-surprise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amat/" rel="tag">Applied Materials (AMAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/todd_harrison.jpg" />Minyanville Professor Sean Udall dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/"><font color="#888888">www.minyanville.com</font></a>.</em></p>
<p>The earnings report from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/applied-materials-inc/amat/nas">Applied Materials, Inc.</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/applied-materials-inc/amat/nas">AMAT</a>) was not solid but the stock sure is, which is what happens when the market starts looking at enterprise value beyond a quarterly EPS report. The stock has been cheap for some time with only the solar catalyst providing occasional lift. Contrary to other noteworthy opinions, I have not heard AMAT call a bottom or "trough" in the cycle for many a quarterly call. It has called for a reduction in the decline in certain product lines, while calling for strength in others. But as far as a broad cyclical "trough" this is the first I heard them utter that since 2005 -- and at that point the company was half right and half wrong. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lam-research-corporation/lrcx/nas">Lam Research Corporation</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lam-research-corporation/lrcx/nas">LRCX</a>) had the best report I've seen in the sub-group. If the (SOX) keeps showing strength then I presume the group may be led by the high quality semi-caps possibly through the first quarter of 2009.<br /> </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cree-inc/cree/nas">Cree, Inc.</a> (Nasdaq: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cree-inc/cree/nas">CREE</a>) report was also noteworthy as the shares have really been hammered of late. The company beat and raised revenue guidance by a touch. However, the thing that has kept me out of CREE for more than just an occasional trade is the lack of EPS traction it seems to have, even on higher revenues. And next quarter's guidance is more evidence of that. From time to time CREE can ramp, and when it does, it's usually a compelling move. So I mainly keep the name on the radar as a technical trading vehicle. If CREE were to back fill to the mid $19's I may add a partial.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/applied-materials-upside-surprise/">Applied Materials' upside surprise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/applied-materials-upside-surprise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1283737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/13/applied-materials-upside-surprise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amat</category><category>applied materials</category><category>AppliedMaterials</category><category>cree</category><category>earnings</category><category>lam research</category><category>LamResearch</category><category>lrcx</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Iran factor in crude oil prices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/the-iran-factor-in-crude-oil-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/the-iran-factor-in-crude-oil-prices/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/the-iran-factor-in-crude-oil-prices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><em>Editor's Note:</em> <em>This post was written by Terry Woo, one of Minyanville's sharpest minds AND/OR brightest bulbs. For more perspective AND/OR insight, visit </em><a href="http://www.minyanville.com"><em>www.minyanville.com</em></a><em>.<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/todd.jpg" alt="" /><br /></em><br />Crude oil is trading lower for a third day in a row. <br /><br />Currently there's talk out there of demand destruction in other countries (i.e. China's slowing economic growth and slowing U.S. economy). But I don't think there has been enough coverage on financial television regarding Iran. </p>
<p>Remember crude's breakout when the world speculated Israel was preparing to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. And remember more upward pressure when Iran retaliated by test firing its long-range missiles. </p>
<p>As reported by CNN yesterday, Undersecretary of State William Burns is accompanying an EU delegation and will meet with a top Iranian nuclear official... something that hasn't happened in decades! It's a game changing event. That combined with North Korea (cooperating with the world in giving up its pursuit of nuclear weapons), I believe this is simply the Iranian risk premium being taken out of the price of oil.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/the-iran-factor-in-crude-oil-prices/">The Iran factor in crude oil prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.minyanville.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/the-iran-factor-in-crude-oil-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1259421/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/17/the-iran-factor-in-crude-oil-prices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>crude oil</category><category>CrudeOil</category><category>north korea</category><category>NorthKorea</category><category>todd harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Harrison]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[StockWatch: Between the Bells with Todd Harrison]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/stockwatch-between-the-bells-with-todd-harrison/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/stockwatch-between-the-bells-with-todd-harrison/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/stockwatch-between-the-bells-with-todd-harrison/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/videos/" rel="tag">Videos</a></p>"Good traders know how to make money, <span style="font-style: italic;">great</span> traders know how to take a loss," Todd Harrison advises in the latest edition of <span style="font-style: italic;">StockWatch: Between the Bells</span>. The prudent founder and CEO of <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/">Minyanville Publishing and Multimedia</a> recommends always working <span style="font-style: italic;">with</span> the market:<span style="font-weight: bold;"> "Trade to win, never trade </span><span style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">not</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"> to lose."</span><br style="font-weight: bold;" /> <br /> <embed width="425" height="360" align="middle" flashvars="settings=90177&amp;pmms=2010491&amp;previewImage=http://www.aolcdn.com/dlembedded/20071026_mf_todd.jpg&amp;autoPlay=0&amp;size=large" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="sameDomain" name="dl_flvwidget" bgcolor="#ffffff" quality="high" src="http://xml.searchvideo.com/eb/i/3369214754/a/58ef677afb89fc040e3dec%206de7dd6c26/p/1/pmmsID/2010491/aolflash/1"></embed><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/stockwatch-between-the-bells-with-todd-harrison/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>StockWatch: Between the Bells with Todd Harrison</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/stockwatch-between-the-bells-with-todd-harrison/">StockWatch: Between the Bells with Todd Harrison</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/stockwatch-between-the-bells-with-todd-harrison/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1023434/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/stockwatch-between-the-bells-with-todd-harrison/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>investing</category><category>markets</category><category>Minyanville</category><category>StockWatch</category><category>Todd Harrison</category><category>ToddHarrison</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Summerlin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
