<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[China, Russia, Brazil reducing their purchases of U.S. securities -- why?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/why-are-china-russia-and-brazil-reducing-their-purchases-of-u-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/why-are-china-russia-and-brazil-reducing-their-purchases-of-u-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/why-are-china-russia-and-brazil-reducing-their-purchases-of-u-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/globe.jpg" alt="" />There is a disturbing trend that is taking shape across the international financial markets. It involves primarily Russia, Brazil and China. Just what are these countries up to? They may be tipping the balance of international finance into uncharted waters. </p>
<p>Specifically, they are buying smaller quantities of U.S. treasuries and using their excess reserves to buy other non-dollar denominated assets. For example, in April total net purchases of long-term equities, notes and bonds rose a net $11.2 billion compared with a gain of $55.4 billion in March. International holdings increased $41.9 billion in April, compared with $55.3 billion in March.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/why-are-china-russia-and-brazil-reducing-their-purchases-of-u-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>China, Russia, Brazil reducing their purchases of U.S. securities -- why?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/why-are-china-russia-and-brazil-reducing-their-purchases-of-u-s/">China, Russia, Brazil reducing their purchases of U.S. securities -- why?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aRADYHh._dKQ>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/why-are-china-russia-and-brazil-reducing-their-purchases-of-u-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19067459/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/16/why-are-china-russia-and-brazil-reducing-their-purchases-of-u-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget deficit</category><category>BudgetDeficit</category><category>China</category><category>featured</category><category>treasury securities</category><category>us debt</category><category>UsDebt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is China's investment in Blackstone a Bush payback to Schwarzman?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/is-chinas-investment-in-blackstone-a-bush-payback-to-schwarzman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/is-chinas-investment-in-blackstone-a-bush-payback-to-schwarzman/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/is-chinas-investment-in-blackstone-a-bush-payback-to-schwarzman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bx/" rel="tag">Blackstone Group L.P (BX)</a></p><p><img height="223" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/740-park.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117967873030008831.html">Blackstone Group will sell 10% of itself</a> [WSJ subscription required] to China's new investment arm prior to Blackstone's initial public offering (IPO). If there was ever an example of how capital is reducing the importance of national boundaries, this is it.</p>
<p>This Blackstone investment -- for a non-controlling stake -- is clearly a bargaining chip in the economically tense relationship between China and the U.S. We need China, since it's financing a big chunk of the $8.8 trillion U.S. federal debt -- it owns $350 billion worth of U.S. Treasury securities.</p>
<p>But China also accounts for a share of the politically sensitive U.S. trade deficit. And due to what Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson considers China's artificially low currency, this trade deficit is not going away. Somehow China, which is coming to the U.S. for trade talks, thinks that having its State Investment Company buy $3 billion worth of Blackstone Group at 95.5% of the IPO price will mollify its critics.</p>
<p>One thing for sure -- China's stake will help Blackstone avoid the problems that <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/29/bloomberg/bxchina.php">Carlyle Group encountered in its efforts to buy companies in China</a>. I guess China would be better off if Blackstone owned the U.S. government. Then again, given that Steve Schwarzman raised $1.2 million last month for Republicans during a New York fund-raiser at his <a href="http://www.mgross.com/books/740-park/">34 room apartment</a> featuring his <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/04/25/2007-04-25_a_million_reasons_why_the_prez_loves_ny.html">Yale dorm mate</a> -- George W. Bush -- maybe China's investment in Blackstone is Bush's payback for Schwarzman's fund-raising.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. </em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/is-chinas-investment-in-blackstone-a-bush-payback-to-schwarzman/">Is China's investment in Blackstone a Bush payback to Schwarzman?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 May 2007 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/is-chinas-investment-in-blackstone-a-bush-payback-to-schwarzman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/900165/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/20/is-chinas-investment-in-blackstone-a-bush-payback-to-schwarzman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blackstone</category><category>Blackstone Group</category><category>Carlyle Group</category><category>CarlyleGroup</category><category>China</category><category>federal debt</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>Hank Paulson</category><category>IPO</category><category>Peter Cohan</category><category>State Investment Company</category><category>Steve Schwarzman</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>Treasury securities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
