<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Fed Members Differ on Economic Outlook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/fed-members-differ-on-economic-outlook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/fed-members-differ-on-economic-outlook/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/fed-members-differ-on-economic-outlook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/federalreserveseal.jpg" />The Federal Reserve has embarked on a controversial new program of buying $600 billion of U.S. Treasuries to keep interest rates low and spur the economy.</p>
<p>There is some disagreement among some members of the Fed concerning the risks of this new program. Some fear that the economy is growing too rapidly, fueling unwanted levels of inflation, as reported by <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/01/04/news/economy/federal_reserve_minutes/index.htm">CNNMoney</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/fed-members-differ-on-economic-outlook/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed Members Differ on Economic Outlook</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/fed-members-differ-on-economic-outlook/">Fed Members Differ on Economic Outlook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2011/01/04/news/economy/federal_reserve_minutes/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/fed-members-differ-on-economic-outlook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19787070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/05/fed-members-differ-on-economic-outlook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>fomc</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Buying More Treasuries Boost the Economy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/will-buying-more-treasuries-boost-the-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/will-buying-more-treasuries-boost-the-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/will-buying-more-treasuries-boost-the-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/federalreserve-getty.jpg" alt="Federal Reserve" />Saint Louis Federal Reserve president, James Bullard, said the Fed may need to <a href="http://stlouisfed.org/newsroom/displayNews.cfm?article=742">buy more treasuries</a> to pump more money into the <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/economy/">economy</a>.</p>
<p>Here we are two years down the road and nothing much has changed. The same old tactics are used to try to boost the economy, while unemployment remains high. In fact, initial <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/19/jobless-claims-jump-to-nine-month-high/">claims for unemployment</a> jumped to 500,000 this past week.</p>
<p>Things are not working out as planned. Why is that?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/will-buying-more-treasuries-boost-the-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Buying More Treasuries Boost the Economy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/will-buying-more-treasuries-boost-the-economy/">Will Buying More Treasuries Boost the Economy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/38772267>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/will-buying-more-treasuries-boost-the-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19601067/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/will-buying-more-treasuries-boost-the-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>treasury</category><category>Treasury purchases</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bonds Up, Stocks Down on Renewed Economic Fears]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/bonds-up-stocks-down-on-renewed-economic-fears/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/bonds-up-stocks-down-on-renewed-economic-fears/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/bonds-up-stocks-down-on-renewed-economic-fears/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstreets.jpg" alt="" />A new fear gripped the market Friday. Originally, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Gross%20Domestic%20Product,GDP" class="inlinked">gross domestic product</a> -- the broadest measure of economic activity -- was reported to have grown 2.4% in the second quarter. Now, many are expecting the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Department%20of%20Commerce" class="inlinked">Department of Commerce</a> will revise this figure down next week. According to a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-20/asian-stocks-decline-yen-strengthens-on-concern-global-growth-is-slowing.html">Bloomberg survey</a>, revised GDP will have lost one point to a more anemic 1.4% growth.</p>
<p>The expectation of the lower GDP caused an accelerated rush to buy Treasuries. On the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Futures%20Market" class="inlinked">futures market</a>, the <a href="http://www.insidestocks.com/mktcom.asp?code=BSTK">30 year bond was up 15 ticks to 134-26</a>. The Dow Jones Industrial average continued its decline, falling yet another 90 points in early morning trade.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/bonds-up-stocks-down-on-renewed-economic-fears/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bonds Up, Stocks Down on Renewed Economic Fears</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/bonds-up-stocks-down-on-renewed-economic-fears/">Bonds Up, Stocks Down on Renewed Economic Fears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-20/asian-stocks-decline-yen-strengthens-on-concern-global-growth-is-slowing.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/bonds-up-stocks-down-on-renewed-economic-fears/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19601676/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/20/bonds-up-stocks-down-on-renewed-economic-fears/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonds</category><category>djia</category><category>economy</category><category>euro</category><category>inthenews</category><category>stocks</category><category>treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup Singled Out for a Long-Term Strangle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/citigroup-singled-out-for-a-long-term-strangle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/citigroup-singled-out-for-a-long-term-strangle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/citigroup-singled-out-for-a-long-term-strangle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Citigroup logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/logo-citigroup.jpg" />Option volume was relatively quiet in Citigroup Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) on Tuesday, with call and put activity both falling short of the expected daily levels. However, a noteworthy volatility play crossed the tape around midday, with one long-term speculator betting on a significant price swing from the bailed-out bank.</p>
<p>Shortly after noon, a block of 10,000 March 2011 4-strike puts traded at the ask price, suggesting they were purchased, while a matching block of 10,000 March 2011 5-strike calls changed hands at the ask price. Open interest at both strikes swelled overnight by more than 10,000 contracts apiece, confirming these were all freshly opened positions.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/citigroup-singled-out-for-a-long-term-strangle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup Singled Out for a Long-Term Strangle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/citigroup-singled-out-for-a-long-term-strangle/">Citigroup Singled Out for a Long-Term Strangle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/citigroup-singled-out-for-a-long-term-strangle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19589361/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/citigroup-singled-out-for-a-long-term-strangle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>calls</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>strangle</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>Treasury</category><category>volatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Drop in Treasury Bond Yields Forecasts a Bear Market for Stocks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/drop-in-treasury-bond-yields-forecasts-a-bear-market-for-stocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/drop-in-treasury-bond-yields-forecasts-a-bear-market-for-stocks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/drop-in-treasury-bond-yields-forecasts-a-bear-market-for-stocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/12/handchart.jpg" />There's an old adage: When bond prices go up, stock prices go down, and vice versa. Over the past three months, Treasury bond yields have taken a big hit (bond prices and bond yields move in the opposite direction). The benchmark 10-year bond yield dropped from 4.01% in April to its present 2.79%. <br />
<br />
David Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff has researched bond yields and their corresponding effect on the stock market. <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/38639558">According to an article on CNBC.com, </a>Rosenberg found that if yields fall more than 1.20%, a bear market in stocks is just a couple of months away.  He cites the bear markets of 1990, 2000 and 2007 as examples.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/drop-in-treasury-bond-yields-forecasts-a-bear-market-for-stocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Drop in Treasury Bond Yields Forecasts a Bear Market for Stocks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/drop-in-treasury-bond-yields-forecasts-a-bear-market-for-stocks/">Drop in Treasury Bond Yields Forecasts a Bear Market for Stocks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/38639558>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/drop-in-treasury-bond-yields-forecasts-a-bear-market-for-stocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19588380/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/11/drop-in-treasury-bond-yields-forecasts-a-bear-market-for-stocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear market</category><category>bond yields</category><category>bonds up stocks down</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>treasury</category><category>treasury bonds</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: DJIA 11,000 Yo-Yo (AA, COP, PALM, MIPI, INTC, JPM)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/closing-bell-djia-11-000-yo-yo-aa-cop-palm-mipi-intc-jpm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/closing-bell-djia-11-000-yo-yo-aa-cop-palm-mipi-intc-jpm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/closing-bell-djia-11-000-yo-yo-aa-cop-palm-mipi-intc-jpm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/alu/" rel="tag">Alcatel-LucentADS (ALU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/bell-black-white-240c050806.jpg" alt="" />This was one of those market days that you could try to blame on earnings season starting out, but it may be nothing more than valuations catching up to stocks at DJIA 11,000 and after the huge stock gains in 2009 and 2010. Investors and traders alike are still using DJIA 11,000 as the battleground. Today's Treasury Budget Deficit came out at -$65.4 billion versus $62 billion expected. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 11,019.50 +13.53 (0.12%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,197.27 +0.79 (0.07%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,465.99 +8.12 (0.33%)<br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/closing-bell-djia-11-000-yo-yo-aa-cop-palm-mipi-intc-jpm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: DJIA 11,000 Yo-Yo (AA, COP, PALM, MIPI, INTC, JPM)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/closing-bell-djia-11-000-yo-yo-aa-cop-palm-mipi-intc-jpm/">Closing Bell: DJIA 11,000 Yo-Yo (AA, COP, PALM, MIPI, INTC, JPM)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/closing-bell-djia-11-000-yo-yo-aa-cop-palm-mipi-intc-jpm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19438163/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/closing-bell-djia-11-000-yo-yo-aa-cop-palm-mipi-intc-jpm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings season</category><category>EarningsSeason</category><category>molecular insight</category><category>treasury</category><category>treasury budget</category><category>TreasuryBudget</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investors Demand Higher Yields on U.S. Treasuries]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/investors-demand-higher-yields-on-u-s-treasuries/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/investors-demand-higher-yields-on-u-s-treasuries/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/investors-demand-higher-yields-on-u-s-treasuries/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/wateringcanmoney.jpg"  alt="" />They call themselves <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c51fbbce-3908-11df-8970-00144feabdc0.html">bond vigilantes</a>. They are investors who are demanding higher yields at U.S. Treasury auctions.</p>
<p>Treasury auctions were going along quite smoothly until last week. Inflation is low, the housing market is in a slump and unemployment is at near record levels. All of this mixture is the stuff that low interest rates are made of.</p>
<p>Last week, the Greek debt crisis brought the problem of too much debt front and center. Now, investors are looking at the U.S. and see a mountain of fiscal debt that needs financing. The huge U.S. debt, $1.7 trillion, is making investors reappraise the yields on U.S. treasuries.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/investors-demand-higher-yields-on-u-s-treasuries/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investors Demand Higher Yields on U.S. Treasuries</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/investors-demand-higher-yields-on-u-s-treasuries/">Investors Demand Higher Yields on U.S. Treasuries</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c51fbbce-3908-11df-8970-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/investors-demand-higher-yields-on-u-s-treasuries/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19417224/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/01/investors-demand-higher-yields-on-u-s-treasuries/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond market</category><category>bonds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>treasuries</category><category>treasury</category><category>yield</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AIG to Hit Feds for Another $2 Billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/aig-to-hit-feds-for-another-2-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/aig-to-hit-feds-for-another-2-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/aig-to-hit-feds-for-another-2-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/aig-logo-240x160.jpg" />American International Group (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) has gone back to the feds. The insurer <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aIlizr.NOkKY&amp;pos=6">pulled another $2.2 billion</a> from its Treasury Department facility to support the property-casualty business units that will comprise the restructured company. AIG used the cash from Treasury to redeem some securities held by its insurance subsidiaries to increase liquidity and address rating agency considerations.</p>
<p>According to David Havens, managing director of credit trading at Nomura Securities (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nomura-holdings-inc/nmr/nys">NMR</a>), "AIG still needs to be cognizant of where the rating agencies stand on their solvency." He adds, in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aIlizr.NOkKY&amp;pos=6">Bloomberg News</a>, that the funds may have been sought after the company got "feedback from the rating agencies that the regulatory capital within the operating companies doesn't muster up."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/aig-to-hit-feds-for-another-2-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AIG to Hit Feds for Another $2 Billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/aig-to-hit-feds-for-another-2-billion/">AIG to Hit Feds for Another $2 Billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aIlizr.NOkKY&amp;pos=6>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/aig-to-hit-feds-for-another-2-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19403190/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/17/aig-to-hit-feds-for-another-2-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>featured</category><category>insurance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nmr</category><category>Nomura</category><category>Rating agencies</category><category>tarp</category><category>Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is It Time to Print Your Own Money?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/is-it-time-to-print-your-own-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/is-it-time-to-print-your-own-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/is-it-time-to-print-your-own-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/250px-detroit_cheer.jpg" alt="" />So, this sounds like a great idea, right? The people of our city are unemployed, leading to less cash and less spending -- so let's <a target="_blank" href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/BetterBanking/struggling-towns-printing-their-own-cash.aspx">print our own money</a>! As those gentlemen in the now-defunct Guinness ads shrieked: Brilliant! In Detroit, a group of businesses are now accepting what is called <a target="_blank" href="http://wpcontent.answers.com/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/29/Detroit_cheer.jpg/250px-Detroit_cheer.jpg">Detroit Cheer</a>. With this local currency you can buy a pizza, receive some electrical services, and day care for your pooch. The Cheer can also be exchanged for cash at local bars. Sounds like it would be illegal, right? Well, the article notes that it isn't -- as long as the printed currency doesn't look too much like the dollar it is perfectly legal. I don't think anyone is going to confuse the Detroit Cheer with the American Dollar.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/is-it-time-to-print-your-own-money/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is It Time to Print Your Own Money?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/is-it-time-to-print-your-own-money/">Is It Time to Print Your Own Money?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/is-it-time-to-print-your-own-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19360109/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/16/is-it-time-to-print-your-own-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Detroit</category><category>Detroit Cheer</category><category>DetroitCheer</category><category>dollar</category><category>money</category><category>money printing</category><category>MoneyPrinting</category><category>North Folk Share</category><category>NorthFolkShare</category><category>print money</category><category>PrintMoney</category><category>treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed Profit Tops $50 Billion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/fed-profit-tops-50-billion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/fed-profit-tops-50-billion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/fed-profit-tops-50-billion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/federalreserve-getty.jpg" alt="" />The Federal Reserve picked up a $52.1 billion profit last year, a record for the organization. The result is due largely to its 2009 bailout efforts. Of the profit generated, $46.1 billion will be handed over to the Treasury Department -- the largest profit payment made since records began back in 1914. The previous record was $34.6 billion, in 2007. Last year, the Fed turned $31.7 billion over to the Treasury Department.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-01-12-fed-profits_N.htm" target="_blank">According to the Associated Press</a>, the profit didn't come from the $700 billion lent to financial institutions -- and then to auto companies like General Motors. Rather, it was the result of earnings from the securities it had in its portfolio last year. Several investment programs were launched last year to help kickstart the U.S. economy and drive down rates on mortgages and consumer debt. Through the programs, the Fed bought $300 billion in government debt, and under another, it's on a trajectory to buy $1.25 trillion in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae mortgage securities.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/fed-profit-tops-50-billion/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed Profit Tops $50 Billion</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/fed-profit-tops-50-billion/">Fed Profit Tops $50 Billion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-01-12-fed-profits_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/fed-profit-tops-50-billion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19314968/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/13/fed-profit-tops-50-billion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>Department of the Treasury</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>featured</category><category>fnm</category><category>fre</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>general motors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgages</category><category>tarp</category><category>Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Banks subsidizing auto TARP, extra money could be spent]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a></p><p>The bailouts of late 2008 and 2009 have cost the American taxpayers $61 billion, according to the <a href="http://www.treasury.gov" target="_blank">Treasury Department</a>, but <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-12-09-bailouts_N.htm" target="_blank">the banks aren't to blame this time</a>. The auto manufacturer bailout, which includes Chrysler and General Motors (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corp-1-5percent-prf-ser-d/grm/nys" target="_blank">GRM</a>), has cost the country more than $30 billion, with American International Group (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys" target="_blank">AIG</a>) consuming another $30 billion.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Bank of America (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys" target="_blank">BAC</a>) has already made good with the government, and several banks -- such as Capital One (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capital-one-financial-corporation/cof/nys" target="_blank">COF</a>), JP Morgan Chase (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys" target="_blank">JPM</a>) and TCF Financial (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tcf-financial-corporation/tcb/nys" target="_blank">TCB</a>) -- only have to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/06/capital-one-warrants-help-chip-away-tarp-obligation/">clean up situations</a> regarding the warrants they've issued. And interestingly, the losses from the bailouts on AIG and auto manufacturers are being offset by profits from the bank bailouts, which could generate additional funds of up to $19.5 billion. <br />   </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Banks subsidizing auto TARP, extra money could be spent</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/">Banks subsidizing auto TARP, extra money could be spent</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19272756/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/10/banks-subsidizing-auto-tarp-extra-money-could-be-spent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>american international group</category><category>AmericanInternationalGroup</category><category>auto</category><category>auto industry</category><category>AutoIndustry</category><category>bac</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>Capital One Financial</category><category>CapitalOneFinancial</category><category>COF</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>grm</category><category>insurance</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpmorganChase</category><category>tarp</category><category>TCB</category><category>TCF Financial</category><category>TcfFinancial</category><category>timothy geithner</category><category>TimothyGeithner</category><category>treasury</category><category>Troubled Asset Relief Program</category><category>TroubledAssetReliefProgram</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank failures hit 106 for 2009]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/bank-failures-hit-106-for-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/bank-failures-hit-106-for-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/bank-failures-hit-106-for-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/fdic_160_green.jpg" />Seven more banks failed late Friday, including institutions in Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Georgia, and three in Florida. The FDIC posted the liabilities it would assume and which banks would take on customers from the shutter institutions in <a href="http://www.fdic.gov/">detail on its website</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bank-failures-hit-100-for-year-2009-10-23">According to</a> <em>MarketWatch</em>, "CreditSights, which tracks the dismal data, predicts that in the current cycle, from 2008 through 2011, as many as 1,100 banks will fail. That would wipe out 13.4% of all U.S. banks, representing 7% of U.S. banking assets."<br />
 </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/bank-failures-hit-106-for-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bank failures hit 106 for 2009</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/bank-failures-hit-106-for-2009/">Bank failures hit 106 for 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/bank-failures-hit-106-for-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19208228/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/24/bank-failures-hit-106-for-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank failures</category><category>FDIC</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fed under fire! Geithner wants to study Fed governance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/federal_reserve.jpg" alt="" />The U.S. Treasury and Congress are putting pressure on the Fed to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=adjvXg1zP.zY">disclose its governance policies</a>.</p>
<p>Almost three months ago, on June 17, the Obama administration proposed a regulatory overhaul including a "comprehensive review of the Fed's ability to accomplish its existing and proposed functions."</p>
<p>There is some confusion as to why the Treasury is undertaking this task. The Fed was created by Congress to be independent of the executive branch and Congress.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Fed under fire! Geithner wants to study Fed governance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/">The Fed under fire! Geithner wants to study Fed governance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19168202/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/23/the-fed-under-fire-geithner-wants-to-study-fed-governance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>audits</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>big banks</category><category>Christopher Dodd</category><category>Congress</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Geithner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Richard Shelby</category><category>supervisory council</category><category>Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. budget deficit unexpectedly narrowed to $111.4 billion in August]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/u-s-budget-deficit-unexpectedly-narrowed-to-111-4-billion-in-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/u-s-budget-deficit-unexpectedly-narrowed-to-111-4-billion-in-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/u-s-budget-deficit-unexpectedly-narrowed-to-111-4-billion-in-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/geithner_speaking_160.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Notch another better-than-expected data point for the U.S. economy: the federal budget deficit totaled $111.4 billion in August, the U.S. Treasury Department announced Friday, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aT_OkQWvWWj0">Bloomberg News reported</a> -- a level well below the $140.0 billion Bloomberg News <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">survey estimate. </a><br /><br />The August deficit brings the 2009 fiscal year deficit to about $1.37 trillion, largely ballooned by the $787 billion stimulus package to jump-start the U.S. economy and the $700 billion bank sector bail-out. There is one month left (September) in the current fiscal year. July's budget deficit was unrevised at $180.6 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/u-s-budget-deficit-unexpectedly-narrowed-to-111-4-billion-in-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. budget deficit unexpectedly narrowed to $111.4 billion in August</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/u-s-budget-deficit-unexpectedly-narrowed-to-111-4-billion-in-a/">U.S. budget deficit unexpectedly narrowed to $111.4 billion in August</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/u-s-budget-deficit-unexpectedly-narrowed-to-111-4-billion-in-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19158324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/14/u-s-budget-deficit-unexpectedly-narrowed-to-111-4-billion-in-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>budget deficit</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: The never ending rally (ABX, GE, PALM, VVUS)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/closing-bell-the-never-ending-rally-abx-ge-palm-vvus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/closing-bell-the-never-ending-rally-abx-ge-palm-vvus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/closing-bell-the-never-ending-rally-abx-ge-palm-vvus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/abx/" rel="tag">Barrick Gold (ABX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />Today was another up and away day, although after the 2:00 PM Beige Book and after a Treasury auction, it felt like today was just going to be a difficult one to call. <br /><br />This is a light week on data and a light day on earnings and that makes it a hard tell each day to have serious conviction for bulls and bears alike. The DJIA went above 9,500 and marks the 4th day in a row of a rally. <br /><br />Here are today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br /><br />Dow 	9,538.23 	+40.89 	(0.43%) <br />S&amp;P 500 	1,032.47 	+7.08 	(0.69%) <br />Nasdaq 	2,058.60 	+20.83 	(1.02%)<br /><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/09/09/top-analyst-upgrades-cof-ebay-gs-jblu-ltm-ma-sndk-ups-wynn/">Top Analyst Upgrades</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/09/09/top-analyst-downgrades-ccj-chkp-dish-dd-kft-mhp-palm-rosg-ubs/">Top Analyst Downgrades</a><br /><a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/09/09/top-day-trader-alerts-ge-palm-vvus-orex-arna-mnkd/">Top Day Trader Alert Stocks</a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barrick-gold-corporation/abx/nys"><br /></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/closing-bell-the-never-ending-rally-abx-ge-palm-vvus/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: The never ending rally (ABX, GE, PALM, VVUS)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/closing-bell-the-never-ending-rally-abx-ge-palm-vvus/">Closing Bell: The never ending rally (ABX, GE, PALM, VVUS)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/closing-bell-the-never-ending-rally-abx-ge-palm-vvus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19156016/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/09/closing-bell-the-never-ending-rally-abx-ge-palm-vvus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beige book</category><category>BeigeBook</category><category>featured</category><category>qnexa</category><category>treasury</category><category>VVUS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China takes a pass on U.S. Treasuries]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/02/china-takes-a-pass-on-u-s-treasuries/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/02/china-takes-a-pass-on-u-s-treasuries/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/02/china-takes-a-pass-on-u-s-treasuries/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="220" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="178" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/dealer_poker_chips_262258_l.jpg" alt="" />Two countries, the United States and China, are playing financial poker, with the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve on one side and China on the other. </p>
<p>On one side, wearing a visor and dark glasses, we have Ben Bernanke of the U.S. Federal Reserve, who must fund our $1.8 trillion deficit. So the U.S. Treasury and the Fed are issuing record amounts of treasury securities. Last week alone the Treasury issued <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124896282178793797.html">$200 billion of debt securities</a>. The results of at least two auctions were a bit shaky.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/02/china-takes-a-pass-on-u-s-treasuries/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>China takes a pass on U.S. Treasuries</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/02/china-takes-a-pass-on-u-s-treasuries/">China takes a pass on U.S. Treasuries</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/02/china-takes-a-pass-on-u-s-treasuries/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19115462/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/02/china-takes-a-pass-on-u-s-treasuries/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>China</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Treasury</category><category>U.S. debt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Treasury clashes with TARP watchdog over $23.7 trillion in proposed expenditures]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/treasury-clashes-with-tarp-watchdog-over-23-7-trillion-in-propo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/treasury-clashes-with-tarp-watchdog-over-23-7-trillion-in-propo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/treasury-clashes-with-tarp-watchdog-over-23-7-trillion-in-propo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/dollar_pyramid.jpg" width="220" height="273" alt="" />Did you know that we have a watchdog in charge of overseeing the TARP program? Yes, we have such a person and his name is Neil Barofsky.</p>
<p>Today the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve said that the group of financial programs undertaken have had a significant impact on our financial markets.</p>
<p>That may be true, but Mr. Barofsky reported that the sum total of these programs is exposing federal agencies to <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ab533a38-757a-11de-9ed5-00144feabdc0.html">a staggering $23.7 trillion</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/treasury-clashes-with-tarp-watchdog-over-23-7-trillion-in-propo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Treasury clashes with TARP watchdog over $23.7 trillion in proposed expenditures</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/treasury-clashes-with-tarp-watchdog-over-23-7-trillion-in-propo/">Treasury clashes with TARP watchdog over $23.7 trillion in proposed expenditures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/treasury-clashes-with-tarp-watchdog-over-23-7-trillion-in-propo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104589/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/treasury-clashes-with-tarp-watchdog-over-23-7-trillion-in-propo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fed</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Neil Barofsky</category><category>TALF</category><category>TARP</category><category>TARP watchdog</category><category>Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$12.9 trillion for economic recovery. Where is it?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/12-9-trillion-for-economic-recovery-where-is-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/12-9-trillion-for-economic-recovery-where-is-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/12-9-trillion-for-economic-recovery-where-is-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" />Here is today's quiz. If you were given $1,000,000 to spend each day, how many days would it take you to spend $12.2 trillion dollars? You are probably wondering where the number $12.2 trillion came from? Well, this is the amount of money the government has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/02/04/business/20090205-bailout-totals-graphic.html?ref=business">committed for economic recovery</a>. </p>
<p>Some of the monies can be accounted for but its still a big mystery where the rest went. So far we know this:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/12-9-trillion-for-economic-recovery-where-is-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$12.9 trillion for economic recovery. Where is it?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/12-9-trillion-for-economic-recovery-where-is-it/">$12.9 trillion for economic recovery. Where is it?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/02/04/business/20090205-bailout-totals-graphic.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/12-9-trillion-for-economic-recovery-where-is-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19072372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/12-9-trillion-for-economic-recovery-where-is-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AIG</category><category>bailout</category><category>bear sterns</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>illiquid assets</category><category>TALF</category><category>TARP</category><category>treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Benchmark 10-year note trades at a new high, depressing markets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/benchmark-10-year-note-trades-at-a-new-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/benchmark-10-year-note-trades-at-a-new-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/benchmark-10-year-note-trades-at-a-new-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/dollarsign-at150-02blog.jpg" />U.S. long-term <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/68ca2d04-55f2-11de-ab7e-00144feabdc0.html">interest rates hit a high Wednesday</a> with the yield on 10-year notes at 4%. Yields jumped 4 basis points, the biggest jump since 2003. This was up from 3.6% just one week ago. Mortgage lenders use the benchmark 10-year note to price their mortgage rates.</p>
<p>Four percent is the magic number for traders. When the yield reached 4%, traders moved in to buy. The higher rate also took its toll on the stock market, with the Dow down 24.04 to 8739.02.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/benchmark-10-year-note-trades-at-a-new-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Benchmark 10-year note trades at a new high, depressing markets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/benchmark-10-year-note-trades-at-a-new-high/">Benchmark 10-year note trades at a new high, depressing markets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/68ca2d04-55f2-11de-ab7e-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/benchmark-10-year-note-trades-at-a-new-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19063923/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/11/benchmark-10-year-note-trades-at-a-new-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonds</category><category>inthenews</category><category>treasury</category><category>US long term rates hit high</category><category>UsLongTermRatesHitHigh</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Geithner Private-Public Partnership: The cure may be worse than the disease!    ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/geithner_obama_220.jpg" />As more details were unveiled yesterday about the Public-Private Partnership proposed by Secretary Timothy Geithner to deal with the "Toxic Assets" currently on the balance sheets of many of the major banks, the equity markets around the world experience what can only be described as euphoria. Equity markets in the United States experienced one of the biggest one-day rallies in history. Obviously, Wall Street likes the plan at first glance.
<p>However, Paul Krugman, the liberal Noble Prize winner, wrote an editorial in <em>The New York Times</em> attacking the plan as "Cash for Trash." Subsequently, Newt Gingrich, the former Republican Speaker of the House, announced on Fox News that he agreed with Professor Krugman. When senior figures on both left and right agree, it may be wise to look past the euphoria.</p>
<br />
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Geithner Private-Public Partnership: The cure may be worse than the disease!    </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/">The Geithner Private-Public Partnership: The cure may be worse than the disease!    </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1496969/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/24/the-geithner-private-public-partnership-the-cure-may-be-worse-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Geithner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Newt Gingrich</category><category>NewtGingrich</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>PaulKrugman</category><category>Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
