<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of Light: U.S. Census Is Hiring]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/ray-of-light-u-s-census-is-hiring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/ray-of-light-u-s-census-is-hiring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/ray-of-light-u-s-census-is-hiring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/census2010.jpg" alt="" />The announcement that the U.S. economy <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/december-chill-u-s-economy-unexpectedly-lost-85-000-jobs/19308677/">unexpectedly lost 85,000 jobs</a> in December was another, difficult dose of information for Americans looking for work, for business executives and policy makers, alike.</p>
<p>Job lay-offs are subsiding, but the goal of large, sustained, monthly increases in jobs -- the kind that's need to maintain the U.S. economic expansion and restore national well-being -- remains on the horizon.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/ray-of-light-u-s-census-is-hiring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of Light: U.S. Census Is Hiring</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/ray-of-light-u-s-census-is-hiring/">Ray of Light: U.S. Census Is Hiring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/ray-of-light-u-s-census-is-hiring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19309370/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/08/ray-of-light-u-s-census-is-hiring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2010 census</category><category>jobs</category><category>U.S. Census Bureau</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S economy's performance, 2001-2008: Where you stand depends on where you sit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/u-s-economys-performance-2001-2008-where-you-stand-depends-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/u-s-economys-performance-2001-2008-where-you-stand-depends-on/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/u-s-economys-performance-2001-2008-where-you-stand-depends-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>One issue likely to influence voters' choice for U.S. president in November is the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>The Iraq War/War on Terror, and other issues, such as health care concerns, are likely to be factors as well, but look for concern about the economy to be paramount. Of course, political science teaches us that party identification and voters' attitude toward each candidate will also help determine the vote for president.</p>
<p>(In a nutshell, the political science theory that best predicts vote is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/American-Voter-Angus-Campbell/dp/0226092542/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1220725474&amp;sr=1-1">PI + ATC + MSI = Vote.</a> Or, Party Identification + Attitude Toward the Candidate + Most Salient Issues = Vote. But more on that, some other time.)</p>
<p>Further, regarding the U.S. economy, there's been considerable coverage regarding its health -- sometimes too much -- but not as much clarity. So, without further ado, some "givens" or clarity about the U.S. economy.</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>U.S. GDP:</strong> The U.S. economy is experiencing anemic growth, but technically, it is not in a recession. Unemployment is trending up -- now at 6.1% -- put is still relatively low, compared to unemployment levels in previous economic slowdowns. [Note: The above is not to slight anyone who has lost his/her job; each job lost is a serious problem/concern for the person involved.] </li>
    <li><strong>Median income:</strong> The median U.S. family income is down. In 2006 the median U.S. family income, adjusted for inflation, was $58,407, according to the most recent <a href="http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/income.html">U.S. Census Bureau data,</a> down from $59,398 in 2000. Since the economic slowdown started in October 2007, it's possible, but not likely, that median family income rose in 2008, but more than likely it fell. Moreover, it probably fell during that time period, for most families. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/u-s-economys-performance-2001-2008-where-you-stand-depends-on/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S economy's performance, 2001-2008: Where you stand depends on where you sit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/u-s-economys-performance-2001-2008-where-you-stand-depends-on/">U.S economy's performance, 2001-2008: Where you stand depends on where you sit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/u-s-economys-performance-2001-2008-where-you-stand-depends-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1306443/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/07/u-s-economys-performance-2001-2008-where-you-stand-depends-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>capital gains</category><category>dividends</category><category>gdp</category><category>interest</category><category>McCain</category><category>median family income</category><category>median income</category><category>Obama</category><category>rental royalties</category><category>U.S. Census Bureau</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Population growth slows in states previously experiencing a housing boom]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/population-growth-slows-in-states-previously-experiencing-a-hous/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/population-growth-slows-in-states-previously-experiencing-a-hous/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/population-growth-slows-in-states-previously-experiencing-a-hous/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/house.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119872248705652005.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">Population growth has slowed</a> in the prior housing boom states of Arizona, Florida and Nevada, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported Thursday [subscription required], citing <a href="http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract.html">U.S. Census Bureau</a> data for the 12 months ended July 1, 2007.<br /><br />Further, the U.S. Census Bureau's report continued to confirm a decades-long trend of U.S. population shift from the Northeast and Midwest to the West and South.<br /><br />Florida, arguably the state that's been hardest hit by the housing slump, experienced the largest decline in population growth, <em>The Journal</em> reported. Florida's population increased by 35,301, or 1%, during the 12-month period, compared to an increase of 134,798 during the previous 12-month period. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/population-growth-slows-in-states-previously-experiencing-a-hous/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Population growth slows in states previously experiencing a housing boom</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/population-growth-slows-in-states-previously-experiencing-a-hous/">Population growth slows in states previously experiencing a housing boom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119872248705652005.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/population-growth-slows-in-states-previously-experiencing-a-hous/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1071793/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/population-growth-slows-in-states-previously-experiencing-a-hous/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Arizona</category><category>featured</category><category>Florida</category><category>housing</category><category>migration</category><category>Nevada</category><category>population</category><category>snowbelt</category><category>sunbelt</category><category>U.S. Census Bureau</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 14:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lies and statistics: Home sales did NOT rise]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/lies-and-statistics-home-sales-did-not-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/lies-and-statistics-home-sales-did-not-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/lies-and-statistics-home-sales-did-not-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insider-blogging/" rel="tag">Insider Blogging</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p>There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. Most people attribute this phrase to 19th century British politician and writer Benjamin Disraeli (it was later popularized by our own Mark Twain). But more recently, financial blogger Barry Ritholtz has embraced the motto as his <em>raison d'etre. </em><br /><br />Ritholtz writes the popular financial/cultural blog <a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/">The Big Picture</a>, where, among other things, he loves to take the headline numbers and debunk them. He understands the numbers. By day he's a market strategist and fund manager. <br /><br />Today he rolls his eyes and examines the latest U.S. Census and Dept. of Housing and Urban Development numbers that show a 4.8% rise in new home sales. <br /><br />What the mainstream press either overlooks or fails to mention is that pesky little margin of error. For September's numbers, for example, the margin of error renders the data statistically insignificant.<br /><br />So<a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2007/10/no-new-homes-sa.html"> statistically speaking, there was no rise.</a> Nothing getting better on the housing front. <br /><br />Damned lies and statistics. Mark Twain would surely be a fan of the Big Picture.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/lies-and-statistics-home-sales-did-not-rise/">Lies and statistics: Home sales did NOT rise</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2007/10/no-new-homes-sa.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/lies-and-statistics-home-sales-did-not-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022066/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/25/lies-and-statistics-home-sales-did-not-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barry Ritholtz</category><category>BarryRitholtz</category><category>home sales rise</category><category>HomeSalesRise</category><category>housing</category><category>housing data</category><category>HousingData</category><category>margin of error</category><category>MarginOfError</category><category>statistics</category><category>The Big Picture</category><category>TheBigPicture</category><category>U.S. Census Bureau</category><category>U.s.CensusBureau</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Tilsner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
