<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Extraordinary measures: An income tax 'holiday' as fiscal stimulus?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/extraordinary-measures-an-income-tax-holiday-as-fiscal-stimul/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/extraordinary-measures-an-income-tax-holiday-as-fiscal-stimul/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/extraordinary-measures-an-income-tax-holiday-as-fiscal-stimul/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="359" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-stock.jpg" />It goes without saying that the current U.S. recession is a serious economic condition that requires extraordinary actions. <br /><br />The Fed, via its new <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/default.htm">"tool box,"</a> the Treasury via <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/news/index1.html">tactical investments under the TARP,</a> and the prospective, largest fiscal stimulus package in U.S. history all represent extraordinary measures. <br /><br />But should the United States consider still another, extraordinary action? Namely, temporarily suspending the federal income tax?<br /><br /><strong>Attacking the recession from both "sides"</strong><br /><br />Experienced investors know that one great divide in economics concerns those economists who emphasize supply side (top-down) factors and those who emphasize demand side (bottom-up) factors. Passing a federal income tax holiday would add supply-side stimulus to likely demand-side stimulus via a fiscal stimulus package in 2009. <br /><br />However, economist Richard Felson told BloggingStocks Tuesday while a federal income tax holiday would be politically-attractive, particularly for U.S. Representatives and Senators up for re-election in 2010, he doesn't favor the approach.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/extraordinary-measures-an-income-tax-holiday-as-fiscal-stimul/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Extraordinary measures: An income tax 'holiday' as fiscal stimulus?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/extraordinary-measures-an-income-tax-holiday-as-fiscal-stimul/">Extraordinary measures: An income tax 'holiday' as fiscal stimulus?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/default.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/extraordinary-measures-an-income-tax-holiday-as-fiscal-stimul/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1395869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/09/extraordinary-measures-an-income-tax-holiday-as-fiscal-stimul/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Fed</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>income tax</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>Obama Administration</category><category>supply side economics</category><category>TARP</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why we should invest in GM, Ford and Chrysler]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/why-we-should-invest-in-gm-ford-and-chrysler/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/why-we-should-invest-in-gm-ford-and-chrysler/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/why-we-should-invest-in-gm-ford-and-chrysler/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/gm-hq-1.jpg" alt="" />First, the United States Congress should pass and the president of the United States should sign a rescue package for General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, post-haste. <br /><br />If this was the "Roaring '90s" or even the "Fabulous '50s," an operational cessation by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">F</a>) and Chrysler, would hurt the U.S. economy. As investors know, however, we are not in the 1990s or the 1950s, but in a teetering economy, and an auto sector cessation would be devastating, driving the U.S. economy into a deeper and longer recession.<br /><br />Second, the notion that only companies that "perform" in the free market should continue and that others, the underperformers, should fail, as an absolute rule, simply has not been the history of the United States economy. Moreover, dozens of companies receive billions of dollars in subsidies from the U.S. government, which is you, the taxpayer.<br /><br />Need a few examples? Let's do what the late, great <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Smith">New York Governor Al Smith</a> would do: Let's look at the record.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/why-we-should-invest-in-gm-ford-and-chrysler/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why we should invest in GM, Ford and Chrysler</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/why-we-should-invest-in-gm-ford-and-chrysler/">Why we should invest in GM, Ford and Chrysler</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/why-we-should-invest-in-gm-ford-and-chrysler/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1374851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/why-we-should-invest-in-gm-ford-and-chrysler/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto manufacturers</category><category>auto rescue</category><category>auto sector</category><category>Bush</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>industrial policy</category><category>Obama</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT's Krugman: Think economic momentum, not balanced budgets]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> columnist and Nobel Prize-winning economist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/opinion/14krugman.html">Paul Krugman</a> underscores that those who are thinking in terms of a balanced federal budget now are doing a serious disservice to the economy, and, by extension, to the nation. <br /><br />It's important for the U.S. Government to return to a balanced budget when the economy returns to health, but it is critically important for Congress to approve a large fiscal stimulus to help the U.S. economy recover from the current recession, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/opinion/14krugman.html">he said.</a> <br /><br /><strong>Sees danger of vicious cycle</strong><br /><br />That's because doing so will help end what Krugman argues is a vicious cycle of contraction that's beginning to play itself out in the economy. Rising unemployment will lead to further reductions in consumer spending, which will lead to further business cutbacks in production and more job cuts, which will lead to further reductions in consumer spending, contracting the economy even more, and so on. It's a destructive cycle that has to be stopped, and fiscal stimulus is part of the healing: it will get momentum headed in the constructive direction. <br /><br />For those who doubt the harm that prematurely trying to balance a budget can do to the U.S. economy, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/opinion/14krugman.html">Krugman offered</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal#Recession_of_1937_and_recovery">FDR's premature attempt to balance the budget in 1937:</a> it almost destroyed the New Deal and the economic recovery taking place in the nation at that time.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT's Krugman: Think economic momentum, not balanced budgets</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/">NYT's Krugman: Think economic momentum, not balanced budgets</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1374796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/17/nyts-krugman-think-economic-momentum-not-balanced-budgets/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>Democrats</category><category>FDR</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>gdp</category><category>New Deal</category><category>Obama</category><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>Pelosi</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bonuses for Wall Street should be zero, U.S. taxpayers say]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/bonuses-for-wall-street-should-be-zero-u-s-taxpayers-say/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/bonuses-for-wall-street-should-be-zero-u-s-taxpayers-say/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/bonuses-for-wall-street-should-be-zero-u-s-taxpayers-say/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>Bonuses for a U.S. Government-rescued Wall Street should take on a 'slightly' leaner tone, according to a sampling of U.S. taxpayers by Bloomberg News. The taxpayers' judgment regarding <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=apRDGKM7Sbi8&amp;refer=home">how large the bonuses should be? Zip.</a> Nothing. Nada. Niet. <br /><br />Wall Street, which created many of the Frankenstein-like financial instruments that either distorted and/or hid loan risk, and also in some cases encouraged the issuing of problematic mortgage forms, is not justified in paying bonuses, and certainly should not award them following the government's massive $700 billion bail-out of the industry, a sampling of U.S. taxpayers indicated.<br /><br />One U.S. resident, Ken Karlson, a 61-year-old Vietnam War veteran who lives in Illinois <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=apRDGKM7Sbi8&amp;refer=home">told Bloomberg News</a>, "I may not understand everything, but I do understand common sense." He added, "the bailout money should not have been given to them in the first place."<br /><br />Economist Richard Felson told BloggingStocks Tuesday acrimony from U.S. citizens is not outlandish or unreasonable given the facts to-date of the current financial crisis.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/bonuses-for-wall-street-should-be-zero-u-s-taxpayers-say/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bonuses for Wall Street should be zero, U.S. taxpayers say</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/bonuses-for-wall-street-should-be-zero-u-s-taxpayers-say/">Bonuses for Wall Street should be zero, U.S. taxpayers say</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=apRDGKM7Sbi8&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/bonuses-for-wall-street-should-be-zero-u-s-taxpayers-say/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1368353/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/11/bonuses-for-wall-street-should-be-zero-u-s-taxpayers-say/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>bank rescue</category><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>bonuses</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Greenspan: I was wrong about banks' ability to police each other]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/greenspan-i-was-wrong-about-banks-ability-to-police-each-other/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/greenspan-i-was-wrong-about-banks-ability-to-police-each-other/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/greenspan-i-was-wrong-about-banks-ability-to-police-each-other/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/greenspan.jpg" />Congressional investigators repeatedly, verbally pummeled former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan Thursday, for what lawmakers charged was a lack of oversight for a mortgage and housing market run amok - - a lapse they believe encouraged a subprime financing boom and collapse that led to the global financial crisis.<br /><br />Greenspan, looking subdued but characteristically composed as he testified before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, conceded that a flaw in his free-market ideology contributed to a "once-in-a-century credit tsunami," <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aJ8os6vTknLk&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Thursday</a>. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Greenspan: mortgage risk was miss-priced</span><br /><br />The flaw, Greenspan said, was the failure by banks and mortgage lenders to properly price risky mortgage assets, including subprime / Alt-A mortgages, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/23/AR2008102300193.html?hpid=topnews"><span style="font-style: italic;">The Washington Post</span> reported Thursday</a>. Further, Greenspan said he saw "no choice" but to force the financial firms that package mortgage loans to "retain a meaningful part of the securities they issue" - - thus mandating that if the loans go bad, they will lose money, as well.<br /><br />Further, Greenspan said he was "partially" wrong in his opposition in recent years to the regulation of derivatives, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aJ8os6vTknLk&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Thursday</a> - - in stark contrast to his May 2005 speech opposing derivatives regulation.<br /><br />Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Thursday that the failure to regulate and review lending practices by banks and mortgage lenders was a bipartisan failure.<br /><br />"Both political parties are responsible because neither Democrats nor Republicans, not just Republicans, cared about the quality of mortgages banks approved during the housing boom," Wang said. "It was like grade inflation in college where the professor gives 'C' grades to students whose work only deserves a 'D.' No one cared about the quality of the loans as long as they were sold and no longer on their balance sheet. In the future, loan originators must retain partial equity in the loan to make them accountable for mortgage defaults."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/greenspan-i-was-wrong-about-banks-ability-to-police-each-other/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Greenspan: I was wrong about banks' ability to police each other</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/greenspan-i-was-wrong-about-banks-ability-to-police-each-other/">Greenspan: I was wrong about banks' ability to police each other</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/greenspan-i-was-wrong-about-banks-ability-to-police-each-other/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1351005/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/23/greenspan-i-was-wrong-about-banks-ability-to-police-each-other/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Greenspan</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgages</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress seen letting budget deficit rise, for now, to pay for rescue package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/congress-seen-letting-budget-deficit-rise-for-now-to-pay-for-r/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/congress-seen-letting-budget-deficit-rise-for-now-to-pay-for-r/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/congress-seen-letting-budget-deficit-rise-for-now-to-pay-for-r/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>Just call the impact of the bank rescue package's cost a 'bad news, goods news' saga.<br /><br />The bad news is this year's budget deficit, for Fiscal 2009, will reach unprecedented heights, in terms of total money borrowed.<br /><br />The good news is the dollar's reserve currency status will lower the financing cost of the rescue package and related deficit spending to an interest rate of 4% - - or less - - on the additional debt, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/business/economy/20cost.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">The New York Times </span>reported Monday</a>. <br /><br />Further, the Congress could have chosen to offset at least a portion of the additional outlays by increasing taxes or trimming spending in other areas. However, given the contraction effects of the above two, Congress has chosen to let the U.S. budget deficit rise, at least for now, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/business/economy/20cost.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">The Times </span>reported</a>.<br /><br /><strong>U.S.: record, back-to-back budget deficit</strong>s<br /><br />The United States just posted a record $438 billion budget deficit (preliminary) for F2008, which ended September 30, <a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/98xx/doc9818/10-2008-MBR.htm">according to Congressional Budget Office data</a>. This year's deficit is likely to exceed $700 billion, so says economist David H. Wang. Is it wise to straight-line the new spending directly to the national debt via borrowing, in Wang's view? Indeed it is, he says. <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/congress-seen-letting-budget-deficit-rise-for-now-to-pay-for-r/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Congress seen letting budget deficit rise, for now, to pay for rescue package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/congress-seen-letting-budget-deficit-rise-for-now-to-pay-for-r/">Congress seen letting budget deficit rise, for now, to pay for rescue package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/congress-seen-letting-budget-deficit-rise-for-now-to-pay-for-r/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1347270/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/20/congress-seen-letting-budget-deficit-rise-for-now-to-pay-for-r/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond market</category><category>bonds</category><category>British pound</category><category>budget deficit</category><category>Congress</category><category>dollar</category><category>euro</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>national debt</category><category>rescue package</category><category>taxes</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Here are two tasks for the new U.S. Congress]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/19/here-are-two-tasks-for-the-new-u-s-congress/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/19/here-are-two-tasks-for-the-new-u-s-congress/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/19/here-are-two-tasks-for-the-new-u-s-congress/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></div>
<p>What financial services/banking reforms and related measures should the new U.S. Congress consider when it convenes in January 2009?</p>
<p>How much time do you have?</p>
<p>Yes, without question, the Congress is going to have a full plate when its first 2009 session starts, and there is a sincere wish -- a really, really sincere wish -- that none of these items has to be addressed sooner. That's the hope, anyway. We'll see.</p>
<p><strong>Task 1: Credit default swaps/derivatives regulation and reform</strong></p>
<p>Simply, all <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_default_swaps">credit default swaps</a>/<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_(finance)">derivatives</a> -- direct and those with counterparties based in the United States -- must be regulated by the U.S. government through the Securities and Exchange Commission, or by the creation of a new Derivatives Regulatory Commission.</p>
<p>Among other powers, this agency would establish capital requirements, list pricing data, and limit leverage ratios for all parties. Banks protected by the FDIC would be banned from owning or selling derivatives or swaps.</p>
<p>The global derivatives market was more then $530 trillion as of June 2008. Of this amount, credit default swaps -- it's really <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">credit default insurance</span> -- totaled more than $55 trillion, according to the International Swaps and Derivatives Association.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/19/here-are-two-tasks-for-the-new-u-s-congress/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Here are two tasks for the new U.S. Congress</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/19/here-are-two-tasks-for-the-new-u-s-congress/">Here are two tasks for the new U.S. Congress</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/19/here-are-two-tasks-for-the-new-u-s-congress/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1346065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/19/here-are-two-tasks-for-the-new-u-s-congress/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>Congress</category><category>credit default swaps</category><category>derivatives</category><category>FDIC</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>gdp</category><category>SEC</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is a second stimulus check up ahead?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/moneyroll.jpg" alt="" />With unemployment rising and the signs of slowdown all around, is a second tax rebate or second stimulus check from Congress up ahead?<br /><br />The U.S. economy continues to slow. More than 800,000 jobs have been lost since the slowdown began about a year ago, and many economists say the lay-offs are likely to continue or even increase. <br /><br />Meanwhile, the world's major industrialized nations are striving <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081013a.htm">to stabilize the global financial system</a> and end a credit crunch that could further damage economies around the world.<br /><br />Well, the answer to the question about a second stimulus check may very well rest on the answer to this one: Who are you voting for on <a href="http://news.aol.com/elections">Election Day, November 4?</a><br /><br /><strong>Key factor: 2008 Election</strong><br /><br />Congressional Democrats, led by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, have vowed to push for a second stimulus package totaling up to $150 billion to help jump-start the anemic U.S. economy, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/13/MNBJ13G887.DTL&amp;type=politics"><span style="font-style: italic;">The San Francisco Chronicle</span> reports</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is a second stimulus check up ahead?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/">Is a second stimulus check up ahead?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1343035/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/15/is-a-second-stimulus-check-up-ahead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Bush</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>income tax</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>Pelosi</category><category>President Bush</category><category>Republicans</category><category>second stimulus check</category><category>stimulus check</category><category>tax cut</category><category>tax rebate</category><category>taxes</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pearlstein: Who to blame for the financial crisis]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/pearlstein-its-easy-to-identify-who-to-blame-in-this-financial/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/pearlstein-its-easy-to-identify-who-to-blame-in-this-financial/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/pearlstein-its-easy-to-identify-who-to-blame-in-this-financial/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><span style="font-style: italic;">Washington Post</span> Business Columnist <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/13/AR2008101302586.html?hpid=topnews&amp;sid=ST2008101302921&amp;s_pos=">Steven Pearlstein</a> does not 'hold it all in,' as they say, regarding who he thinks is most to blame for the financial crisis.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/13/AR2008101302586.html?hpid=topnews&amp;sid=ST2008101302921&amp;s_pos=">Pearlstein cites</a> the ineptitude of Wall Street and the nation's financial regulators. The crisis would have occurred whether Lehman Brothers was saved or not, because bad debt had overwhelmed the global financial system. A government intervention was inevitable, essential, and an act of leadership, in Pearlstein's view.<br /><br />Conversely, Wall Street's top executives have shown little leadership, if any, he said. Their silence and invisibility throughout the crisis "attests to their moral and political bankruptcy," Pearlstein said, a perfect match for the financial bankruptcy they caused for investors, creditors, and customers. <br /><br />Further, Pearlstein is particularly angered by Wall Street's top executives unwillingness to commit to a plan to enable borrowers to refinance mortgages into government guaranteed mortgages set at 85% of current market value of the property, and at the executives' utter lack of comment before the cameras, particularly regarding credit lines to businesses.<br /><br style="font-weight: bold;" /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Political &amp; Economic Analysis:</span> Columnist Pearlstein clearly lays the blame for the financial crisis at the feet of Wall Street's top officials. Still, the mortgage process -- and the failure of a substantial portion of the subprime/Alt-A mortgage market -- involved many players: bank executives/lenders, mortgage brokers, appraisers, securitization specialists, ratings agencies, and borrowers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/pearlstein-its-easy-to-identify-who-to-blame-in-this-financial/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pearlstein: Who to blame for the financial crisis</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/pearlstein-its-easy-to-identify-who-to-blame-in-this-financial/">Pearlstein: Who to blame for the financial crisis</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/pearlstein-its-easy-to-identify-who-to-blame-in-this-financial/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1341665/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/pearlstein-its-easy-to-identify-who-to-blame-in-this-financial/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alt A</category><category>appraisers</category><category>bank rescue</category><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>borrowers</category><category>home prices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>median home prices</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>mortgages</category><category>ratings agencies</category><category>Steven Pearlstein</category><category>subprime</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[EU, sensing credit whirlwind, seen trying again for unified response]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/eu-sensing-credit-whirlwind-seen-trying-again-for-unified-resp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/eu-sensing-credit-whirlwind-seen-trying-again-for-unified-resp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/eu-sensing-credit-whirlwind-seen-trying-again-for-unified-resp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>Think it's hard for the U.S. Congress to agree on a policy? <br /><br />Try getting a policy passed by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union">European Union</a>. <br /><br />Strictly speaking, of course, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament">European Parliament</a> (both chambers), not the EU, is akin to the Congress, but the 27-nation EU is proving to be almost as unwieldy as the EP.<br /><br />The EU's decision to increase the guarantee on bank deposits to 50,000 euros or about $68,000 Tuesday represented the first common, or unified approach to the financial crisis, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The New York Times</span> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/business/worldbusiness/07global.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;hp&amp;adxnnlx=1223385004-a8qQ9L1vtCh1WVFcOcgR0A">reported Tuesday</a>, despite incontrovertible data indicating that the credit crunch is restricting lending, both short- and long-term, and is slowing commerce. <br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">EU stance: 'Every nation for himself'</span><br /><br />Economist Richard Felson told BloggingStocks Tuesday the EU's lack of unified action highlights the limitations of Europe's supranational political system. "For those European nations using the euro, these nations are unified by a common central bank. But fiscal policy, in terms of a treasury department, remains at the nation-state level. That makes it much harder to coordinate a bank rescue, for example," Felson said. <br /><br />That's the main reason the EU hasn't passed a rescue package similar in scope to the U.S. Congress', Felson said. "Europe's economy is just as large as the U.S.'s and it's likely to experience distressed/bad debt aftereffects almost as large as those in America. It requires a unified response, but thus far it's been 'every nation for himself.' It's very disappointing, from a governance standpoint."<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/eu-sensing-credit-whirlwind-seen-trying-again-for-unified-resp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>EU, sensing credit whirlwind, seen trying again for unified response</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/eu-sensing-credit-whirlwind-seen-trying-again-for-unified-resp/">EU, sensing credit whirlwind, seen trying again for unified response</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/eu-sensing-credit-whirlwind-seen-trying-again-for-unified-resp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1335424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/07/eu-sensing-credit-whirlwind-seen-trying-again-for-unified-resp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank sector</category><category>banking</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>Germany</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgate backed securities</category><category>resuce package</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>United Kingdom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's probably best to not watch sausage or legislation being made ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/04/its-probably-best-to-not-watch-sausage-or-legislation-being-mad/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/04/its-probably-best-to-not-watch-sausage-or-legislation-being-mad/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/04/its-probably-best-to-not-watch-sausage-or-legislation-being-mad/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img  height="202" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/andouille_public_domain.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Much has been written about the add-ons or 'pork' in the <a href="http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/hp1168.htm">rescue package</a> passed by the U.S. Congress and signed President Bush.</p>
<p>The add-ons, which increased the bill's projected cost by $130-$165 billion, depending on the analysis, have been viewed as another example of "special interest lobbying," "sneaky ways to get pet projects passed," "ripping off the taxpayer" and/or as simply un-American.</p>
<p>Well, the truth is, add-ons in the United States have taken place in every Congress since <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States">the nation was founded</a>. Further, no one really knows who made the first legislative "deal," but to say that senators in ancient Rome or officials in Greece, did not trade votes for projects or patronage would be a stretch.</p>
<p><strong>"Democracy is the worst system ...</strong></p>
<p>Of course, it's much more ethical -- some would call it virtuous -- to propose a bill, then get a large majority to render a decision on the program/policy/law solely on its merits, driven by whether the bill is in the nation's interest.</p>
<p>And likewise, add-ons/pork can increase federal spending by substantial amounts, which makes it harder for the federal government -- or any government, for that matter -- to live within its means.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/04/its-probably-best-to-not-watch-sausage-or-legislation-being-mad/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's probably best to not watch sausage or legislation being made </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/04/its-probably-best-to-not-watch-sausage-or-legislation-being-mad/">It's probably best to not watch sausage or legislation being made </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/04/its-probably-best-to-not-watch-sausage-or-legislation-being-mad/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1333115/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/04/its-probably-best-to-not-watch-sausage-or-legislation-being-mad/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>comity</category><category>Democrats</category><category>earmarks</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>legislative process</category><category>lobbying</category><category>logrolling</category><category>patronage</category><category>pork</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The U.S.'s journey to economic recovery begins this fall]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/the-u-s-s-journey-to-economic-recovery-begins-this-fall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/the-u-s-s-journey-to-economic-recovery-begins-this-fall/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/the-u-s-s-journey-to-economic-recovery-begins-this-fall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/obama-mccain.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Falling stock market; massive credit market stress; bankers reluctant to lend; bank defaults; companies cutting back investment / plant expansions; large budget deficit; large trade deficit; falling currency; stagnant economy; rising unemployment; high cost of food, energy; and a large portion of the public stating that the nation is on the wrong track, economically.<br /><br />If you think the U.S. economy is presently mimicking that of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World">third-world country</a> in the 1970s, you're right. <br /><br />The United States, after nearly a decade of policy errors and business / consumer mistakes, is in its worst condition economically since the stagflation-plagued 1970s, but with credit market problems that dwarf that era's financing challenges.<br /><br />In a time like this, when new, negative data points occur almost daily, it's difficult to pinpoint when the turning point will occur. But one may occur in as little as four weeks. Are there economists out there who are doubling as soothsayers? No, it's merely the U.S. Presidential and Congressional election, so says economist Richard Felson.<br /><br />The first order of the day is financial market stabilization. If the U.S. House of Representatives goes along with the U.S. Senate and approves the rescue bill, that's step one toward financial market stability, Felson said. Add ons / companion public programs will further bolster lender and corporate confidence that the credit markets are not going to go the way of the Edsel, he said.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/the-u-s-s-journey-to-economic-recovery-begins-this-fall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The U.S.'s journey to economic recovery begins this fall</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/the-u-s-s-journey-to-economic-recovery-begins-this-fall/">The U.S.'s journey to economic recovery begins this fall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/the-u-s-s-journey-to-economic-recovery-begins-this-fall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1331748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/the-u-s-s-journey-to-economic-recovery-begins-this-fall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>John McCain</category><category>McCain</category><category>Obama</category><category>presidency</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martin Wolf: Wall Street and Main Street are streets that meet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/martin-wolf-wall-street-and-main-street-are-streets-that-meet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/martin-wolf-wall-street-and-main-street-are-streets-that-meet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/martin-wolf-wall-street-and-main-street-are-streets-that-meet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><span style="font-style: italic;"></span><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/recessionpicture.jpg" /><span style="font-style: italic;">Financial Times</span> columnist <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0fa9d526-8eec-11dd-946c-0000779fd18c.html">Martin Wolf</a> inquires, do Americans understand their financial and economic system? <br /><br />Anger at Wall Street's - - and regulators' - - lapses is justified, but at the end of the day to oppose the rescue package is at once self-defeating, contradictory, self-punitive, and borders on nihilism, Wolf states. Take your pick regarding which is the most damaging. <br /><br />Congressional representatives, particularly conservative Republicans, but also others, opposed the flawed rescue plan as a bailout for the rich, and as a statement against <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism"><span style="font-style: italic;">'socialism.'</span></a> <span style="font-style: italic;">Socialism?</span> Yes, the plan is flawed, Wolf states, but the ruin that will result from rejecting the plan will destroy the legitimacy not of socialism, <span style="font-style: italic;">but of the market economy</span>. Exactly what are the packages' opponents fighting?<br /><br />The Congressmen/women also say that they are 'taking a stand for Main Street and against Wall Street.' A contradiction, Wolf writes. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0fa9d526-8eec-11dd-946c-0000779fd18c.html">Wolf:</a> Wall Street and Main Street are streets that meet. That is what streets do. <br /><br />Then there is the future. What is the opponents' alternative? The loudest voice here appears to be 'let the market sort things out by itself,' under the assumption that the damage, costs, and negative consequences really won't be that bad. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0fa9d526-8eec-11dd-946c-0000779fd18c.html">Wolf:</a> This is not prudent, if the early 20th century's experiences are a guide.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/martin-wolf-wall-street-and-main-street-are-streets-that-meet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Martin Wolf: Wall Street and Main Street are streets that meet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/martin-wolf-wall-street-and-main-street-are-streets-that-meet/">Martin Wolf: Wall Street and Main Street are streets that meet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:16:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/martin-wolf-wall-street-and-main-street-are-streets-that-meet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1331279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/martin-wolf-wall-street-and-main-street-are-streets-that-meet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>banking sector</category><category>bond market</category><category>capitalism</category><category>corporate capitalism</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Democrats</category><category>European Union</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>gdp</category><category>globalization</category><category>interest rates</category><category>Main Street</category><category>main street u.s.a.</category><category>MainStreet</category><category>MainStreetU.s.a.</category><category>Martin Wolf</category><category>mixed capitalism</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>socialism</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:16:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Across the pond, the E.U. is talking about a rescue package for Europe]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/across-the-pond-the-e-u-is-talking-about-a-rescue-package-for/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/across-the-pond-the-e-u-is-talking-about-a-rescue-package-for/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/across-the-pond-the-e-u-is-talking-about-a-rescue-package-for/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>A problem that originated in the New World is re-exposing some long-standing nuanced opinions in the Old World. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=abOnSPeeUwAE">France and Germany disagreed</a> over how to prevent the global credit crunch from further hurting European banks. Germany, Europe's largest economy, does not want to set up a bailout / rescue fund that France is seeking. Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Junker said the fund, which France argued should be as large as 300 billion euros or about $415 billion, isn't needed. <strong><br /></strong><br />Economist Richard Felson said the United Kingdom also is against the idea, with Britain arguing that an ad hoc intervention policy would be sufficient for now. "A lot will depend on how the U.S. rescue package, provide it passes the U.S. House, performs in lowering overnight interest rates and restoring confidence," Felson said. "There's the sense in the U.K. that while the crisis extends beyond America's borders, the bulk of the bad-asset fallout will still be U.S.-based."<br /><br />The <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/01/AR2008100101530.html?hpid=topnews">U.S. Senate passed</a> a revised rescue package, 74-25, Wednesday night and the U.S. House is expected to vote on the measure as soon as Friday. <br /><br />However, the measure had little impact on overnight interest rates, at least initially. The London Interbank Overnight Rate, or LIBOR, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aBxs213UjqjA&amp;refer=home">rose for a fourth day</a>, up 6 basis points to 4.21% Wednesday night, as banks continued to hoard cash.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/across-the-pond-the-e-u-is-talking-about-a-rescue-package-for/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Across the pond, the E.U. is talking about a rescue package for Europe</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/across-the-pond-the-e-u-is-talking-about-a-rescue-package-for/">Across the pond, the E.U. is talking about a rescue package for Europe</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/across-the-pond-the-e-u-is-talking-about-a-rescue-package-for/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1330968/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/across-the-pond-the-e-u-is-talking-about-a-rescue-package-for/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout plan</category><category>EU</category><category>euro zone</category><category>European Union</category><category>France</category><category>gdp</category><category>Germany</category><category>interest rates</category><category>InterestRates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LIBOR</category><category>Luxembourg</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>rescue plan</category><category>trade</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AT&amp;T says credit market stress crimping operations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/atandt-says-credit-market-stress-crimping-operations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/atandt-says-credit-market-stress-crimping-operations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/atandt-says-credit-market-stress-crimping-operations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>AT&amp;T Chairman / CEO Randall Stephenson said Tuesday that his company was <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2008-09-30-att-credit-crisis_N.htm">unable to sell any commercial paper</a> last week for terms longer than overnight. <br /><br />"Your ability to plan for investment is obviously affected. You kind of don't know what your cost of capital six months from now is going to be," Stephenson <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2008-09-30-att-credit-crisis_N.htm">told The AP</a>. "We'll just be very guarded, cautious in terms of where we invest, very guarded and cautious in terms of hiring and capital spending. We'll see where this situation goes."<br /><br />Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Wednesday <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">AT&amp;T's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) challenges selling commercial paper underscore the nature of the financial crisis and the need for lawmakers / policy makers in Washington to act, "with all deliberate speed." <br /><br />"When a cash-rich giant like AT&amp;T, the corporate equivalent of an 850 Tri-merged <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FICO_score#FICO_score_and_others">FICO score,</a> has trouble selling commercial paper longer than overnight, a bell should go off in your head," Wang said, adding that he does not own shares of any telecom company.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/atandt-says-credit-market-stress-crimping-operations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AT&amp;T says credit market stress crimping operations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/atandt-says-credit-market-stress-crimping-operations/">AT&amp;T says credit market stress crimping operations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/credit/2008-09-30-att-credit-crisis_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/atandt-says-credit-market-stress-crimping-operations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1330424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/atandt-says-credit-market-stress-crimping-operations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>T</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rescue bill's revision seen as opportunity to recapitalize banks, refinance mortgages]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/rescue-bills-revision-seen-as-opportunity-to-recapitalize-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/rescue-bills-revision-seen-as-opportunity-to-recapitalize-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/rescue-bills-revision-seen-as-opportunity-to-recapitalize-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>With the U.S. Senate expected to debate and vote on a revised bailout/rescue bill in the next day or so (famous last words), two revisions <a href="http://www.senate.gov/">the world's greatest deliberative body</a> should incorporate are bank recapitalization options and funding to refinance mortgages, economists say. <br /><br />BloggingStocks' Peter Cohan <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/27/100-year-crash-what-should-we-do-now/">has written extensively</a> on the need to recapitalize banks, and economist Richard Felson concurs. However, Felson argued that the revised rescue bill should give banks and other institutions the option of either offering their distressed/bad debts to the U.S. Treasury in its reverse auction or accepting a mutually agreeable investment by the U.S. Treasury into the institution.<br /><br /><strong>Creating options for stressed banks</strong><br /><br />"This will give banks more options, and in my view more incentives to participate in the rescue plan. If the plan just contains asset purchase provisions some banks may balk at the prospect of selling some assets at a fire-sale price of 10 cents or 15 cents on the dollar, and that may prevent some distressed assets from being removed from the system, delaying the financial system's recovery," Felson said. "Offering to buy a stake in the bank offers another recapitalization option." <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/rescue-bills-revision-seen-as-opportunity-to-recapitalize-banks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Rescue bill's revision seen as opportunity to recapitalize banks, refinance mortgages</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/rescue-bills-revision-seen-as-opportunity-to-recapitalize-banks/">Rescue bill's revision seen as opportunity to recapitalize banks, refinance mortgages</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/rescue-bills-revision-seen-as-opportunity-to-recapitalize-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1329937/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/rescue-bills-revision-seen-as-opportunity-to-recapitalize-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>banking sector</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Federal Housing Administration</category><category>FHA</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>gdp</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>mortgages</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pearlstein: Lack of rescue package threatens global financial system]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/pearlstein-lack-of-rescue-package-threatens-global-financial-sy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/pearlstein-lack-of-rescue-package-threatens-global-financial-sy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/pearlstein-lack-of-rescue-package-threatens-global-financial-sy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><span style="font-style: italic;">Washington Post</span> <a href="http:// http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/29/AR2008092902762.html?hpid=topnews ">business columnist Steven Pearlstein</a> does not mince words: too many people just don't get it. <br /><br />Moreover, yours truly is not one to alarm, and typically views 'sweeping and dramatic statements' with a journalist's skepticism and a <a href="http://www.apsanet.org/">scholar's critical review</a>. <br /><br />But when the best economists you talk to, and business executives, and others in financial and investment circles, start reaching the same conclusion, from decidedly different vantage points, the dramatic statement begins to take on more weight, becoming more compelling.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">'The reality of the facts on the ground'</span><br /><br />Further, as <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/29/AR2008092902762.html?hpid=topnews">Pearlstein incisively points out,</a> there are reasons why a considerable portion of the American people are not 'getting it' regarding how serious the current situation is. Politicians are more concerned about ideology, partisan posturing, and teaching people a lesson -- if you can believe that they could be so irresponsible (my astonishment added, not Pearlstein's). Financiers have been very slow to admit to greed, arrogance, and incompetence. And foreign government leaders still view the financial crisis as 'an American problem.' <br /><br />But none of the above changes what Pearlstein, and what my closest economist colleagues (David H. Wang, Richard Felson, Peter Dawson, M. Chandler, and Glen Langan) all argue is "the reality of the facts on the ground," to borrow a phrase from Israel's former Prime Minister and Defense Minister <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariel_Sharon">Ariel Sharon.</a> Namely, that a massive, global deleveraging is taking place, and that absent a systemic rescue/intervention by the U.S. Government, in conjunction with interventions by other governments around the world, the world risks the bursting of a credit bubble that threatens to bring down the global financial system.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/pearlstein-lack-of-rescue-package-threatens-global-financial-sy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pearlstein: Lack of rescue package threatens global financial system</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/pearlstein-lack-of-rescue-package-threatens-global-financial-sy/">Pearlstein: Lack of rescue package threatens global financial system</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/pearlstein-lack-of-rescue-package-threatens-global-financial-sy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1329231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/pearlstein-lack-of-rescue-package-threatens-global-financial-sy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>debt</category><category>deleverage</category><category>deleveraging</category><category>Democrats</category><category>foreclosures</category><category>gdp</category><category>interest rates</category><category>leverage</category><category>median home prices</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>Steven Pearlstein</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Until fear is checked, credit freeze up will not ease]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/until-fear-is-checked-credit-freeze-up-will-not-ease/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/until-fear-is-checked-credit-freeze-up-will-not-ease/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/until-fear-is-checked-credit-freeze-up-will-not-ease/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>The U.S. Congress' rejection of the $700 billion rescue bill generated a predictable response from private banks late Monday night. The cost of borrowing rates surged the most on record as banks were increasingly reluctant to lend to one another. <br /><br />The London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, rose an astounding 431 basis points to 6.88% Monday night, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=alszNo3N0CHo&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Tuesday</a>.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the Euro Interbank Offered Rate rose to a record 5.05%, reflecting cash hoarding, rising fear, and a breakdown in normal trading.<br /><br />Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks he expects overnight interest rates to remain abnormally high until the U.S. Congress passes a rescue bill, or U.S. and international leaders find another mechanism to get bad assets out of the financial system.
<p>"There's plenty of liquidity in the system. The problem is no one is lending to one another, and that's fear, basically. Until we implement policies to reduce and eliminate fear, the fear problem is going to grow and there will be more bank failures and other failures," Wang said. "There is no end in sight for this crisis until the psychology has been changed."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/until-fear-is-checked-credit-freeze-up-will-not-ease/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Until fear is checked, credit freeze up will not ease</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/until-fear-is-checked-credit-freeze-up-will-not-ease/">Until fear is checked, credit freeze up will not ease</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=alszNo3N0CHo&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/until-fear-is-checked-credit-freeze-up-will-not-ease/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1328535/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/until-fear-is-checked-credit-freeze-up-will-not-ease/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>banking sector</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Fed</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LIBOR</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>Paulson</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Emotions shouldn't cloud decision on the bailout plan!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/emotions-shouldnt-cloud-decision-on-the-bailout-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/emotions-shouldnt-cloud-decision-on-the-bailout-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/emotions-shouldnt-cloud-decision-on-the-bailout-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"><img alt="Wall Street protesters " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/nyse-protest.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />New York Times</span> Chief Financial Correspondent and Columnist <a href="http://www.charlierose.com/guests/floyd-norris">Floyd Norris</a>, appearing on the <a href="http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2008/09/29/1/an-update-on-the-economy">"Charlie Rose" talk show</a> Monday night on PBS, offered an insight that sort of summed up the financial crisis, the need for a rescue bill, and the reason a considerable portion of the American public doesn't like the rescue package.<br /><br />Floyd Norris said: <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">"At times it does appear that Wall Street is saying 'Bail us out or the U.S. economy is ruined.' And, if you're a citizen of the U.S., it's perfectly normal to be upset and angered by that. The problem is, what Wall Street is saying is true."</span><br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">No time for perfection</span><br /><br />The rescue bill, even the expected, revised rescue bill by Congress, will not be perfect. And yes, it will help some on Wall Street, including (unfairly) those who 'gamed' the system, or whose business mistakes, dubious securitization frameworks, or just plain greed helped create the crisis in the first place. But the nation does not have the luxury of taking six months to compose and pass a 'perfect' bill. The nation needs a rescue package, imperfect though it may be, to stabilize the financial system. And it needs it now.<br /><br />Should you, the typical investor be upset about that? Sure, it's o.k. and it's a natural response to be upset, but don't let that emotion lead you to believe the nation or the financial system would be better off without a rescue bill; it won't be. And it's not possible to prevent Wall Street institutions from being involved in the solution -- at this time-pressured, critical juncture, they have to be. As <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Times'</span> Floyd Norris noted, Wall Street knows it, we know it, everyone knows it. So accept it, and move forward with the necessary work of getting a rescue plan in place.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/emotions-shouldnt-cloud-decision-on-the-bailout-plan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Emotions shouldn't cloud decision on the bailout plan!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/emotions-shouldnt-cloud-decision-on-the-bailout-plan/">Emotions shouldn't cloud decision on the bailout plan!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.charlierose.com/guests/floyd-norris>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/emotions-shouldnt-cloud-decision-on-the-bailout-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1328711/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/emotions-shouldnt-cloud-decision-on-the-bailout-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bailout bill</category><category>banking sector</category><category>bond market</category><category>capitalism</category><category>Charlie Rose</category><category>credit</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>Floyd Norris</category><category>free markets</category><category>gdp</category><category>globalization</category><category>interest rates</category><category>investment banks</category><category>PBS</category><category>Public Broadcasting System</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. House leadership's new task: Find 13 more votes ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/capitol.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />By almost all accounts, the defeat of the bailout / rescue bill stunned those both inside the beltway, on Wall Street, and across the nation. <br /><br />Many political analysts projected that the bill would be approved by the U.S. House of Representatives by about a 80-100 vote margin. The reality: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/bailout.fallout/index.html">bill defeated, 228-205</a> and the stock market plunged a big seven zero zero and more.<br /><br />Public policy analysts, professional and otherwise, will spend ample time investigating the reasons why the bill failed, but in a crisis such as this one, congressional leaders, save for reviewing their mistakes, do not have time for the stuff of graduate seminars in public policy: they need to get a rescue bill passed.<br /><strong><br />Now what? </strong><br /><br />Well first, don't panic. As <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Bailey_(fictional_character)">George Bailey</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Stewart_(actor)">Jimmy Stewart</a>) said during the bank run on the the Bailey Building &amp; Loan in the movie, <a style="FONT-STYLE: italic" href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/MovieSpeeches/moviespeechitsawonderfullifaddresstothepeople.html">It's A Wonderful Life</a>, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">"Now just remember that this thing isn't as black as it appears. Now, we can get through this thing all right. But we've, we've got to stick together.</span>"<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/bailout.fallout/index.html"></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. House leadership's new task: Find 13 more votes ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/">U.S. House leadership's new task: Find 13 more votes ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/bailout.fallout/index.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1327920/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/30/u-s-house-leaderships-new-task-find-13-more-votes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1929</category><category>1929 stock market crash</category><category>bailout bill</category><category>Barney Frank</category><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>Democrats</category><category>featured</category><category>gdp</category><category>John Boehner</category><category>mortgage backed securities</category><category>Nancy Pelosi</category><category>NYSE</category><category>Republicans</category><category>rescue bill</category><category>stock market</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. House of Representatives</category><category>U.S. Senate</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><category>U.s.Economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 08:59:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
