<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Obama's New Hampshire strength highlights Clinton's vulnerablity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/obamas-new-hampshire-strength-highlights-clintons-vulnerablity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/obamas-new-hampshire-strength-highlights-clintons-vulnerablity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/obamas-new-hampshire-strength-highlights-clintons-vulnerablity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bobamapic.jpg" alt="" />There's an old political adage that goes, "Regarding the nomination process, Republicans fall in line, Democrats fall in love." Tuesday's New Hampshire primary provided ample evidence of the above, for each party. <br />Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) strong showing instantaneously catapults him to formidable contender status in the Democratic race. His performance also suggests -- and we won't know this empirically until survey research has been analyzed -- that he has expanded the electorate. Obama increased voter turnout particularly, and unexpectedly, among voters ages 18-21. This age group has had the lowest turnout rate of any age group in primaries and presidential elections since 1952 when political scientists began keeping statistics.<br /><br />Obama's appeal among independents was also high, and -- also troubling for the campaign of Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) -- his appeal among Democratic Party-affiliated voters was much stronger than expected. Furthermore, African-American voters -- although not a major factor in New Hampshire -- now appear to be shifting decidedly in his direction nationally, a big change from the previously overwhelming support they gave to Clinton as late as this summer. As a result of the latter, look for the Clinton camp to face a markedly tougher fight in the South Carolina primary, which is the next hurdle, along with Nevada, before Tsunami Tuesday (formerly called Super Tuesday), on February 5.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/obamas-new-hampshire-strength-highlights-clintons-vulnerablity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Obama's New Hampshire strength highlights Clinton's vulnerablity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/obamas-new-hampshire-strength-highlights-clintons-vulnerablity/">Obama's New Hampshire strength highlights Clinton's vulnerablity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/us/politics/09elect.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/obamas-new-hampshire-strength-highlights-clintons-vulnerablity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1081895/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/09/obamas-new-hampshire-strength-highlights-clintons-vulnerablity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 presidential elections</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Bill Clinton</category><category>Clinton</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Election 2008</category><category>Election2008</category><category>elections</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>Independents</category><category>Nevada</category><category>New Hampshire</category><category>Obama</category><category>politics</category><category>presidential politics</category><category>primaries</category><category>primary season</category><category>Republican</category><category>RepublicanParty</category><category>South Carolina</category><category>Super Tuesday</category><category>Tsunami Tuesday</category><category>U.S. politics</category><category>U.S. Presidency</category><category>U.s.Presidency</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would you vote for Lou Dobbs for president?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p>Sources close to CNN broadcast journalist/commentator Lou Dobbs said he is seriously considering a run for the U.S. presidency in 2008, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119515461427494522.html"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported.</a><br /><br />Dobbs, who formerly hosted CNN's <em><a href="http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Moneyline+(TV+series)">MoneyLine</a></em> business news show and currently hosts CNN's <em><a href="http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/">Lou Dobbs Tonight</a></em> has seen both his ratings and his name recognition rise after his work's focus turned away from news reporting and anchoring and toward political and economic commentary. <br /><br />Dobbs, an independent, displays an ideology and a political world view that many have characterized as a modified hybrid of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Nader">Ralph Nader</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Nader">Pat Buchanan</a> -- i.e. populism combined with strong views against free trade (or current trade frameworks) and against illegal immigration. <br /><br />Dobbs is a frequent critic of both the Democratic and Republican parties, which he argues don't represent the interests of the typical person or the middle class. His show's website describes him as "an independent populist and the leading media advocate for working men and women, their families, our middle class and the American way of life."<br /><br /><strong>Political Analysis:</strong> Unless there's a tidal wave of discontent in the American electorate not tallied by pollsters, Dobbs, as a third-party candidate or as an Independent, has virtually no chance of being elected president of the United States. Although his name recognition is rising and he has a positive public image, it's highly unlikely Dobbs could assemble the campaign staff and money required to compete effectively against Democratic and Republican parties' nominees. <br /><br />However, this is not to say that Dobbs could not broaden the discourse, i.e. "force the discussion of less-publicized issues" during a debate. Dobbs could accomplish this, but it must be emphasized that making points in a debate is a much easier task than receiving enough votes to win the electoral college vote for U.S. president.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/">Would you vote for Lou Dobbs for president?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1041890/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/would-you-vote-for-lou-dobbs-for-president/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 election</category><category>Buchanan</category><category>business news shows</category><category>Cable News Network</category><category>CNN</category><category>commentary</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Dobbs</category><category>elections</category><category>free trade</category><category>immigration</category><category>Independents</category><category>Lou Dobbs</category><category>Lou Dobbs Tonight</category><category>middle class</category><category>Nader</category><category>Pat Buchanan</category><category>political commentary</category><category>politics</category><category>polling</category><category>polls</category><category>populism</category><category>presidential election</category><category>Ralph Nader</category><category>Republican Party</category><category>Republicans</category><category>trade</category><category>U.S. politics</category><category>U.S. presidency</category><category>voters</category><category>voting</category><category>working class</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
