<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tell-Tale Stat: Fed Paid $78.4 Billion to U.S. Treasury in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" alt="" />One economic data point that sort of slipped under the radar recently concerned the U.S. Federal Reserve's <a href="http:// http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/other/20110110a.htm">$78.4 billion payment</a> to the U.S. Treasury in 2010, up about 65% from $47.4 billion in 2009.</p>
<p>And the reason for the revenue surge? Experienced investors or others who have reviewed <a href="http:// http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/other/20110110a.htm">the Fed's report</a> will realize that much of it stems from income from the Fed's purchase of mortgage securities and Treasury securities in connection with the quantitative easing, part 2 program, or QE2. </p>
<p>Under QE2, the Fed will purchase up to $600 billion in assets from November 2010 to June 2011 -- this coming after the Fed purchased $1.7 trillion in assets through March 2010.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tell-Tale Stat: Fed Paid $78.4 Billion to U.S. Treasury in 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/">Tell-Tale Stat: Fed Paid $78.4 Billion to U.S. Treasury in 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19810493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>QE2</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>US Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Treasury to Sell Hartford, Lincoln National Warrants]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/treasury-to-sell-hartford-lincoln-national-warrants/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/treasury-to-sell-hartford-lincoln-national-warrants/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/treasury-to-sell-hartford-lincoln-national-warrants/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/logohartford.jpg"  alt="" />Hartford Financial (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-hartford-financial-services-group-inc/hig/nys">HIG</a> - <a href="http:// http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-hartford-financial-services-group-inc/hig/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today after <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/treasury-announces-new-warrant-auctions/801235">the US Treasury Department announced it will sell its warrant positions in HIG and Lincoln National</a> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/lincoln-national-corporation/lnc/nys">LNC</a>) over the next several weeks. The Treasury initially received these warrants as part of the financial sector bailout program. This news is sending both stocks significantly lower as traders expect these sales will create bearish pressure on the stock. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on HIG.<br />
<br />
This morning, HIG opened at $22.19. So far today the stock has hit a high of $22.22 and a low of $21.51. As of 12:30, HIG is trading at $21.94, down $0.51 (-2.3%). The chart for HIG looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives HIG a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/treasury-to-sell-hartford-lincoln-national-warrants/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Treasury to Sell Hartford, Lincoln National Warrants</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/treasury-to-sell-hartford-lincoln-national-warrants/">Treasury to Sell Hartford, Lincoln National Warrants</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/treasury-to-sell-hartford-lincoln-national-warrants/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19623783/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/07/treasury-to-sell-hartford-lincoln-national-warrants/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hartford Financial</category><category>HIG</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>Lincoln National</category><category>LNC</category><category>options</category><category>US Treasury</category><category>warrants</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: A Sideways Sort of Day (C, F, AAPL)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/closing-bell-a-sideways-sort-of-day-c-f-aapl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/closing-bell-a-sideways-sort-of-day-c-f-aapl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/closing-bell-a-sideways-sort-of-day-c-f-aapl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />The big market news of the day is that Citigroup, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/c/nys">C</a>) will not have Uncle Sam for a shareholder for much longer. The news that the Treasury would sell the taxpayer interest in the bank pushed shares down 3% to $4.18.<br />
<br />
For the most part the market traded sideways. Ford Motor Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/f/nys">F</a>) dropped slightly on its announcement that it March sales were be nothing extraordinary. Shareholders expected the month to be a home run. Apple, Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) shares hit a new 52-week high of $233.87 as excitement grew about its iPad launch<br />
<br />
Today's unofficial closing bell numbers:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,895.86 +45.50 (0.42%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,173.22 +6.63 (0.57%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,404.36 +9.23 (0.39%)<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/closing-bell-a-sideways-sort-of-day-c-f-aapl/">Closing Bell: A Sideways Sort of Day (C, F, AAPL)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/closing-bell-a-sideways-sort-of-day-c-f-aapl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19418926/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/29/closing-bell-a-sideways-sort-of-day-c-f-aapl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ipad</category><category>tarp</category><category>us treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: Can't Win Every Day (ADBE, GENZ, SBUX, COP, GENT, S)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/closing-bell-cant-win-every-day-adbe-genz-sbux-cop-gent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/closing-bell-cant-win-every-day-adbe-genz-sbux-cop-gent/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/closing-bell-cant-win-every-day-adbe-genz-sbux-cop-gent/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" />Blame a poor US Treasury auction, blame poor home sales data, or blame Portugal after a Fitch downgrade. Regardless, the markets needed a breather and may need even more of a breather ahead. Depending upon which stock indexes you track, we had been in a constant gain environment with the market up 10 of the past 11 days. <br />
<br />
Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:<br />
<br />
Dow 10,836.15 -52.68 (-0.48%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 1,167.72 -6.45 (-0.55%) <br />
Nasdaq 2,398.76 -16.48 (-0.68%)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://vsinvestor.com/2010/03/top-day-trader-alerts-adbe-genz-jbl-len-line-mee-nvax-sbux.html">ToP Day Trader Alerts</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/03/24/todays-best-market-rumors-march-24-2010/">Top Stock and Market Rumors</a><br />
<a href="http://247wallst.com/2010/03/24/3-ipos-in-1-day-calix-maxlinear-and-first-interstate-bancsystem-calx-mxl-fibk/">3 IPOs today</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/closing-bell-cant-win-every-day-adbe-genz-sbux-cop-gent/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: Can't Win Every Day (ADBE, GENZ, SBUX, COP, GENT, S)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/closing-bell-cant-win-every-day-adbe-genz-sbux-cop-gent/">Closing Bell: Can't Win Every Day (ADBE, GENZ, SBUX, COP, GENT, S)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/closing-bell-cant-win-every-day-adbe-genz-sbux-cop-gent/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19413151/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/closing-bell-cant-win-every-day-adbe-genz-sbux-cop-gent/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gentium</category><category>genzyme</category><category>lukoil</category><category>portugal</category><category>us treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Paulson: Not Saving AIG Would Have Pushed U.S. Unemployment to 25%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/paulson-not-saving-aig-would-have-pushed-u-s-unemployment-to-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/paulson-not-saving-aig-would-have-pushed-u-s-unemployment-to-2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/paulson-not-saving-aig-would-have-pushed-u-s-unemployment-to-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aig/" rel="tag">Amer Intl Group (AIG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/paulsonpic.jpg"  alt="" />Former U.S. Treasury Hank Paulson was not subtle in his opening remarks Wednesday to a U.S. House committee investigating both the U.S. Treasury's decision to bail-out American International Group, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>) via 100% payments to its counterparties, and the U.S. Federal Reserve's quantitative easing policy. <br />
<br />
Paulson, said had federal policy makers not acted to save AIG, a failure of the financial system could have ensued, and pushed the U.S. unemployment rate to a Great Depression-esque 25%, marketwatch.com <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/paulson-25-unemployment-rate-without-aig-bailout-2010-01-27-131520">reported Wednesday.</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/paulson-not-saving-aig-would-have-pushed-u-s-unemployment-to-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Paulson: Not Saving AIG Would Have Pushed U.S. Unemployment to 25%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/paulson-not-saving-aig-would-have-pushed-u-s-unemployment-to-2/">Paulson: Not Saving AIG Would Have Pushed U.S. Unemployment to 25%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/paulson-not-saving-aig-would-have-pushed-u-s-unemployment-to-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19334512/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/paulson-not-saving-aig-would-have-pushed-u-s-unemployment-to-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bailout</category><category>hank paulson</category><category>HankPaulson</category><category>recession</category><category>us treasury</category><category>UsTreasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[US Treasury extends bailout program to 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/us-treasury-extends-bailout-program-to-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/us-treasury-extends-bailout-program-to-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/us-treasury-extends-bailout-program-to-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/geithner_speaking_160.jpg" alt="" />US Treasury Geithner wants to protect his turf. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/57ecb456-e4d7-11de-817b-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1">He sent a letter</a> to Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Harry Reid extending the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) until October 3, 2010, keeping $550 billion in bailout funds.</p>
<p>His letter states that: "The extension is necessary to assist American families and stabilize financial markets because it will, among other things, enable us to continue to implement programs that address housing markets and the needs of small businesses and to maintain the capacity to respond to unseen needs."<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/us-treasury-extends-bailout-program-to-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>US Treasury extends bailout program to 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/us-treasury-extends-bailout-program-to-2010/">US Treasury extends bailout program to 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/57ecb456-e4d7-11de-817b-00144feab49a.html?nclick_check=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/us-treasury-extends-bailout-program-to-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19271828/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/us-treasury-extends-bailout-program-to-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>tarp</category><category>timothy geithner</category><category>TimothyGeithner</category><category>us treasury</category><category>UsTreasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. budget passes $1 trillion with one more quarter to go]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/u-s-budget-passes-1-trillion-with-one-more-quarter-to-go/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/u-s-budget-passes-1-trillion-with-one-more-quarter-to-go/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/u-s-budget-passes-1-trillion-with-one-more-quarter-to-go/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/budget.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Three quarters of the fiscal year is comfortably behind us, and the U.S. budget deficit has already passed the $1 trillion mark. In June alone, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/federalgovernment/">federal government</a> spent faster than it earned to the tune of $94.3 billion. The result is below the median predicted by 30 estimates <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aiaDbSX1Ziwg" target="_blank">according to a <em>Bloomberg News</em> survey of economists</a> -- projections ranged from $70 billion to $109.3 billion for the month. This is the first time we've had a June deficit since 1991. </p>
<p>In June 2008, the deficit for the month was a much more modest (but still sizeable) $33.5 billion. But last month spending spiked 37% to $309.7 billion, while revenue plunged 17% to $215.4 billion. </p>
<p>So how does the rest of the year look? Pretty grim. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/u-s-budget-passes-1-trillion-with-one-more-quarter-to-go/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. budget passes $1 trillion with one more quarter to go</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/u-s-budget-passes-1-trillion-with-one-more-quarter-to-go/">U.S. budget passes $1 trillion with one more quarter to go</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aiaDbSX1Ziwg>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/u-s-budget-passes-1-trillion-with-one-more-quarter-to-go/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19096752/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/14/u-s-budget-passes-1-trillion-with-one-more-quarter-to-go/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>federal government</category><category>FederalGovernment</category><category>office of management and budget</category><category>OfficeOfManagementAndBudget</category><category>omb</category><category>tax</category><category>tax revenue</category><category>taxes</category><category>TaxRevenue</category><category>treasury department</category><category>TreasuryDepartment</category><category>us treasury</category><category>UsTreasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Geithner's proposal to spend another $1 trillion to buy toxic assets is foolhardy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/geithners-proposal-to-spend-another-1-trillion-to-buy-toxic-as/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/geithners-proposal-to-spend-another-1-trillion-to-buy-toxic-as/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/geithners-proposal-to-spend-another-1-trillion-to-buy-toxic-as/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner is expected to give out <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/03/14/business/business-us-g20-usa-toxic.html?_r=1">details of his toxic asset purchase plan</a>, which includes forming public-private partnership. The cost of the program is estimated at $1 trillion!</p>
<p>Before you can even think of spending another $ 1 trillion bailing out the banks, you have three major problems to take care of:</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan Chase &amp; Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) is holding $ 87.7 trillion of CDSs "off the books." <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) are holding another $43 trillion of CDSs "off the books." That's $130.7 trillion "off the books" for just three banks. CDSs, CDOs and CLOs are over the counter (OTC) transactions. Bank regulators do not determine the dollar value of these transactions. If you don't even look at the transactions, how can you determine the extent of the problem? This is why the title of this post says it is foolhardy to spend $1 trillion of taxpayer money when you don't even know the extent of the problem.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/geithners-proposal-to-spend-another-1-trillion-to-buy-toxic-as/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Geithner's proposal to spend another $1 trillion to buy toxic assets is foolhardy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/geithners-proposal-to-spend-another-1-trillion-to-buy-toxic-as/">Geithner's proposal to spend another $1 trillion to buy toxic assets is foolhardy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/03/14/business/business-us-g20-usa-toxic.html?_r=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/geithners-proposal-to-spend-another-1-trillion-to-buy-toxic-as/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1488318/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/geithners-proposal-to-spend-another-1-trillion-to-buy-toxic-as/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>c</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jpm</category><category>toxic asset purchase program</category><category>ToxicAssetPurchaseProgram</category><category>US Treasury</category><category>UsTreasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If it's Sunday, it must be bailout time]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/if-its-sunday-it-must-be-bailout-time/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/if-its-sunday-it-must-be-bailout-time/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/if-its-sunday-it-must-be-bailout-time/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fnm/" rel="tag">Federal Natl Mtge (FNM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/dollar-bill.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />After last Thursday, when the Dow lost 345 points, I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/market-to-tumble-on-bad-economic-stats/">speculated</a> that another bailout plan would emerge over the upcoming weekend. As I posted, there was <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/04/nobody-knows-why-the-dow-dropped-345-points-today/">no obvious reason</a> why the market fell so much that day. But one of the possible clues of trouble was that Bill Gross, who manages the $800 billion Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), was <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aZLLPW9YEa60">making noises</a> about how the government needed to spend $500 billion to save the housing market. </p>
<p>Coincidentally, Gross -- whose holdings include <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aZLLPW9YEa60">$500 billion</a> in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) -- is rumored to have "helped" the Treasury with its bailout plan for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Fannie Mae</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-national-mortgage-association/fnm/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FNM</font></a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Freddie Mac</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation/fre/nys"><font color="#0072bc">FRE</font></a>). And he has profited handsomely from it since he bought the MBS during the panic-- which have risen in value post-bailout.</p>
<p>The reason I felt that a bailout was coming is because this administration has a solid track record of responding to stock market plunges with weekend rescue plans. Evidently it is concerned that Asian markets -- more specifically China's which happens to own $340 billion worth of MBS -- need a weekend bailout plan so when their markets open on Monday they will have something to celebrate. <em><a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/09/weekend-bailout.html">The Big Picture</a></em> has provided a helpful service by listing the six Sundays in the last 14 months that the government has announced a new bailout plan for the financial markets.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/if-its-sunday-it-must-be-bailout-time/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>If it's Sunday, it must be bailout time</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/if-its-sunday-it-must-be-bailout-time/">If it's Sunday, it must be bailout time</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/09/weekend-bailout.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/if-its-sunday-it-must-be-bailout-time/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1308594/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/09/if-its-sunday-it-must-be-bailout-time/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bill gross</category><category>BillGross</category><category>Economy</category><category>fannie mae</category><category>fannie maefreddie mac</category><category>FannieMae</category><category>FannieMaefreddieMac</category><category>featured</category><category>freddie mac</category><category>FreddieMac</category><category>US Treasury</category><category>UsTreasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Corporate loan default rate spiking]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/corporate-loan-default-rate-spiking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/corporate-loan-default-rate-spiking/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/corporate-loan-default-rate-spiking/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/wallstreets.jpg"  alt="" />Another shoe is dropping in the ongoing credit collapse here in this <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/ubs-exec-and-mccain-advisor-phil-gramm-u-s-is-nation-of-whine/">nation of whiners</a>. According to the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/business/05norris.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print">New York Times</a></em>, the default rate on so-called Leveraged Loans -- (a very strange name if you ask me since a loan is leverage) that refers to loans used to finance corporate takeovers -- climbed fast from 0.24% in August 2007 to 3.3% in August 2008.</p>
<p>The loans that have gone bad so far are not big ones -- they are more like the canary in the coal mine -- hinting at bigger problems to come. The <em>Times</em> says, "the loans that have gone bad have been concentrated in two industries - real estate and auto parts. S.&amp; P. calculates that they have accounted for almost half of this year's defaults. Gambling has also had problems, as it turns out that there are too many casinos in some places."</p>
<p>The biggest loans have yet to default. But their collapse is inevitable. That's because banks are scrambling to raise capital and shore up their balance sheets. And the leveraged loans were structured to benefit from a lending market in which the name of the game was to keep from losing market share by making it ever easier to borrow. Thus the terms of leveraged loans were easy -- featuring, as the <em>Times</em> reported, a "flood of 'covenant-lite' and 'toggle-[Payment in Kind] PIK' loans." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/corporate-loan-default-rate-spiking/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Corporate loan default rate spiking</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/corporate-loan-default-rate-spiking/">Corporate loan default rate spiking</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/05/business/05norris.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/corporate-loan-default-rate-spiking/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1305324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/corporate-loan-default-rate-spiking/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banks</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>BenBernanke</category><category>Featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>Henry Paulson</category><category>HenryPaulson</category><category>Investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>leveraged loans</category><category>LeveragedLoans</category><category>The Fed</category><category>TheFed</category><category>us treasury</category><category>UsTreasury</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Temasek, one sovereign fund, backs down]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/temasek-one-sovereign-fund-backs-down/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/temasek-one-sovereign-fund-backs-down/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/temasek-one-sovereign-fund-backs-down/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/temasektower.jpg" />The Treasury and some members of Congress are concerned that sovereign funds from the Middle East and Asia may use their investments in US banks and corporations to push their global political goals. Treasury Undersecretary for International Affairs David McCormick said the government-controlled funds may raise "legitimate national security concerns," and may distort markets if not managed properly, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-cites-concerns-sovereign-wealth/story.aspx?guid=%7BA0C6D031%2D4CB2%2D4955%2DBAE2%2D6F9E9A1F6B48%7D">according to</a> <em>MarketWatch. </em></p>
<p>If the large funds walk away from investing in the US, especially when banks and brokerages may need more money to weather the credit crisis, finding large pools of capital may be difficult.</p>
<p>But, one sovereign fund, Singapore state investor Temasek, appears to be willing to agree to make official its intention to put money into US companies for only "financial" reasons. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSSIN33955320080306">According to</a> <em>Reuters, "</em>A Temasek Holdings executive told a U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee that it supports the aim of U.S. lawmakers to maintain the right balance between national security and investment flows."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/temasek-one-sovereign-fund-backs-down/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Temasek, one sovereign fund, backs down</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/temasek-one-sovereign-fund-backs-down/">Temasek, one sovereign fund, backs down</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-cites-concerns-sovereign-wealth/story.aspx?guid=%7BA0C6D031%2D4CB2%2D4955%2DBAE2%2D6F9E9A1F6B48%7D>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/temasek-one-sovereign-fund-backs-down/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1132972/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/06/temasek-one-sovereign-fund-backs-down/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>david mccormick</category><category>DavidMccormick</category><category>gulf states</category><category>GulfStates</category><category>inthnews</category><category>Singapore</category><category>sovreign wealth funds</category><category>SovreignWealthFunds</category><category>temasek</category><category>US Treasury</category><category>UsTreasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
