Ted Allrich is the founder of The Online Investor and author of the just released book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. In this weekly column, he'll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.

We are heading for a crisis of confidence, confidence in the core of the U.S. economy, the capitalist way of life, starting with financial institutions and permeating every other industry from autos to homebuilders. Investors wonder if institutions as we know them will survive. Will foreign firms buy every American company? Or will they dry up and blow away? Will all the banks shut down? Stock prices suggest many investors are thinking maybe all of these will happen.

And why not? Ford Motor (NYSE: F) announced it won't introduce a new F-150 truck, the best selling truck of all time. The reason: there are acres and acres of old F-150s sitting on dealer lots that no one wants. General Motors (NYSE: GM) is shutting truck plants longer than usual since very few of its big moneymakers are moving off lots. Homebuilders are showing huge losses and all of them say there is no light at the end of this dark tunnel. Bank news gets worse each day, with headlines screaming that we aren't near to knowing how bad this mortgage and credit crisis really is.

There is no shelter in this storm. Everywhere investors look, they see more dark clouds. Most of them believe that it gets darkest just before it get pitch black. Is the American dream gone, turned into an economic nightmare, the likes of which we haven't seen since the Depression?

Hardly. During the depression, over 30% of the workforce wasn't working. Prices were constantly going lower as fewer and fewer goods were sold. All the banks were shut for a "Bank Holiday" for three days shortly after Roosevelt was elected. People were roaming the country, looking for a job, anything to keep food on the table for their families. If the American dream were going to die, it would have done so in the late 30's and early 40's. But it didn't.

First Quarter GDP was revised to 0.9% up from the initial estimate of 0.6%. This was also up from the fourth-quarter GDP number of 0.6%. The increase was largely due to increased export growth with consumer spending up but quite anemic.

Initial jobless claims came in at 372,000 which were up from 368,000 from the prior week. However, this was still well below the 400,000 number often mentioned as associated with recessions.

These numbers indicate that it is likely that the U.S. economy will avoid a recession this year. The monetary easing from the Federal Reserve seems to be cushioning the downturn with businesses and the consumer. We are also seeing the positive aspect of a lower dollar with increased export growth. The fiscal stimulus will also be kicking in the economy as the rebate checks arrive in the mail.

Does this mean that the economy will start to rally? Not likely. The housing downturn continues and will act as a break on consumer spending. This has no quick fix and will take time to repair itself. The last housing crisis in the late 1980s and early 1990s took several years to be resolved. This time will not be any quicker.

The currency of our realm, the US Dollar, has been losing value for many years, but lately the results of this sad state of affairs have become increasingly more evident. Concerns are mounting on a global basis not just in the United States. The euro, once pegged at a buck, is now trading at $1.55, while gold has passed $1,000 and oil has continued its charge, breaking through the $110 per barrel mark.

While a good deal of this problem is home grown, the pain is being felt all around the world. We have read many stories about how the American economy is a smaller part of the global economy and becoming somewhat detached. This is nonsense. What has happened is that the global economy has become infinitely more integrated and like any integrated structure (the architect speaking), what occurs in one place is felt everywhere.

The Federal Reserve Board, led by Chairman Ben Bernanke, has been watching the economy in an extremely measured fashion, bordering on casual. To those who see beyond Bernanke's calm demeanor, one should imagine a stock trader of old, holding the ticker tape up to his eyes and monitoring every change, every blip in the market as the ticker tape machine clicks away, spewing out the latest market activity.

"Among the panel of 49 National Association for Business Economics economists surveyed between January 25 and February 13, about 45 percent said they believe a recession will have occurred by the end of this year," according to Reuters. Since many of these economists failed to foresee a slowing of growth, their forecast may be little different from flipping a coin. Being right half of the time is the likely outcome.

Economists appear to actually be optimists in disguise. It is hard to believe that the odds of a recession are less than 50%. The economy is producing no job growth. Home foreclosures and housing price erosion probably have forced large states like California, Michigan, and Florida into recession.The falling tax base will make it more difficult for cities and states to raise money.

Rising commodity prices are making food and oil more expensive. This, in turn, is hurting the alternative energy, automotive, retail, and airline sectors. Fast food and other restaurant operations are likely to be set back by the increasing cost of items like bread and milk. Banks are tight with money for businesses and private customers because their balance sheets are so poor. The lending market is beginning to lock up.

Most economists make a lot of money. They may not see what is going on around them with ordinary people. When a tough economy costs some of them their jobs, they may come around to a more realistic view.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallstreet.com.

Longtime FedEx (NYSE: FDX) CEO Fred Smith says that the global economy is in trouble because it cannot escape the downturn in the U.S. He told the FT that "growth elsewhere helps cushion the shock but nothing can displace a slowdown in the U.S. I don't care how optimistic people are about China or anything else, [the US] is still 25 percent of the world's economic activity so when it slows down, it is going to have an effect."

If Smith is right, it punches a hole in one of the major economic assumptions about how the next downturn may work. Many economists believe that emerging markets will continue to grow rapidly and the multinational U.S. companies will be able to keep exports to those regions high. This, in turn, would help keep earnings strong and make any softness in the U.S. short.

But Smith argues that high energy prices will hit economies around the world and that no region will be immune.

Smith's view of the impact of fuel prices may be distorted. FedEx is much more dependent on fuel prices for margins than most companies. In its last quarterly report, the company gave a muted view of the next few quarters. But transports are now a modest part of the worldwide GPD, so Smith may be looking at the problem from the wrong angle.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT) announced stronger-than-expected earnings and hinted that the upcoming holiday shopping season will be strong. This is just another sign that the US economy is strong enough to withstand the subprime mess, rising commodity prices, and the general negativity portrayed by the mainstream media.

Haven't we been warned that consumer spending is going to tank, because of the effect of the subprime meltdown, and rising fuel prices will keep shoppers at home. Well Wal-Mart, which derives so much revenue from the very shoppers that are supposed to be staying at home due to rising fuel prices, said that they expect consumer spending to be higher than expected.

As I posted yesterday, the economy grew 3.9% last quarter and job creation continues to be strong. Imagine what the US economy is going to look like in another 6 months when the subprime shakeout will have little effect on economic growth. All the naysayers who think the economy is heading into a recession, aren't looking at the big picture. Growth is fine and will pick up in '08.

As soon as investors regain some perspective, and finish their tax-loss selling (which is a big contributor to the recent sell-off), I would expect a very strong stock market rebound, to last well into Q1 '08.

Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC and Senior Editor of IsraelNewsletter.com. He holds no position in any stock mentioned as of 11/13/07.

Anyone who has sat through a U.S. Congressional hearing -- present company included -- will tell you that the hearings are often 99% exasperation and 1% illumination.

Hours of each session can go by without hearing anything voters/readers really need to know about. Still, every once in a while, up pops something imaginative, sometimes even involving a topic that wasn't intended to be the focus of the hearing.

Such an event occurred Thursday during U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's testimony before the U.S. Congress' Joint Economic Committee.

Bernanke, responding to a question from U.S. Senator and Committee Chairman Charles Schumer (D-New York) on the federal government's $417,000 insurance cap on mortgages, suggested that Congress could consider allowing Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), under a temporary plan, to buy mortgages up to $1 million from banks and mortgage companies, pay the U.S. Government a fee for having the federal government guarantee them, then turn them into securities to be sold as investments.

One day after cutting key short-term interest rates, the U.S. Federal Reserve, in a surprise move, added $41 billion in liquidity to the markets, The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) reported Thursday.

The Fed used three separate operations to inject the $41 billion, in the largest injection of funds since the August 2007 credit/liquidity crisis, The Journal reported.

Fed Analysis: At first glance, the Fed's $41 billion infusion may seem contradictory, given Wednesday's mild quarter-point interest rate cut and accompanying statement that appeared to lay the ground for a monetary easing "pause" at its next meeting in December.

Still, a more careful read reveals that these slightly divergent actions are complementary and nothing new for the Fed. With Wednesday's statement the Fed signaled that U.S. GDP growth is adequate (but not robust), and that the markets are functioning well, while also noting the Fed remains on guard for price pressures. Thursday's $41 billion infusion signals that the Fed, nevertheless, also remains ready to ensure the proper function of the markets, should additional credit market disturbances surface in the weeks and months ahead. In sum, it's a classic, nuanced, two-step by the Fed: it's ready to implement a rate cut pause if the economy gains momentum, but simultaneously ready to add liquidity, should conditions warrant.

With its quarter-percentage point cut Wednesday in the fed funds rate to 4.50% and the discount rate to 5.00%, the Fed appeared to tilt slightly against another interest rate cut in December.

In its statement, the Fed said "economic growth was solid in the third quarter" and that strains on financial markets had eased somewhat on balance. The Fed added that today's action "combined with the policy action taken in September, should help forestall some of the adverse effects on the broader economy."

Fed Analysis: The above suggests that Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Fed are laying the groundwork for an end to the Fed's brief easing of monetary policy, if in fact the U.S. economy grows at an acceptable rate or inflation accelerates. The economy has slowed through 2007, but on Tuesday Q3 GDP unexpectedly accelerated to 3.9%, the U.S. Commerce Department announced, up from 3.8% in Q2. It's quite likely Tuesday's Q3 GDP statistic influenced the Fed -- swiping away any notion of a half-percentage-point, or 50 basis point, reduction in short-term rates. Further, while monetary policy doves will argue that the sub-prime mortgage and sluggish housing sector headwinds remain, monetary policy hawks -- or those who believe the Fed does not need to cut rates further -- can argue that the Fed has two GDP data points, Q2 and Q3, which indicate that the U.S. economy is growing at a sufficient rate, and that the Fed can now keep interest rates where they are, absent new evidence of a slowing economy, in the quarters ahead.

The plan makes sense, at least on paper. GE (NYSE: GE) believes that it can offset any slowdown in its US business by the acceleration of revenue in China and India. It is, perhaps, one of the benefits of being a multinational.

The FT writes that, "GE's chairman and chief executive (Jeffrey Immelt) said the company's sales in emerging markets such as China and India were expanding at 20 percent a year, and there were few signs of this growth slowing."

But, GE's view is based on two assumptions that may not be true. The first is that a slowdown in the US will not spread to Asia and the Indian subcontinent. Much of the export income from China and India depends on demand in the US and Europe. if that demand slackens, there is no guarantee that their own economies will be able to continue growing rapidly.

GE is also assuming that growth in these countries, particularly China, will not come without a cost. Trade tensions between the US and the world's most populous country still exist. The China toy debacle demonstrates that. It would not take so terribly much for China to shut its markets to certain US goods and services, if it feels that it has been provoked.

GE's plan to keep growing outside the US looks good, for now.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wall st.com.

No one ever said serving on the U.S. Federal Reserve Board of Governors was easy. Next Wednesday's Fed meeting may provide a case study regarding just how difficult that job is.

The FOMC, led by Chairman Ben Bernanke, will be asked once again to address the health of the U.S. economy amid two contrasting views of reality. To be sure, different interpretations regarding the U.S. economy is not something the Fed has never encountered: they're the essence of the arena of ideas that flourish in a free society, and part of what makes a market "a market."

The Fed, it seems, is perpetually trying to sift through the arguments (and data) of those who believe inflation is too high and those who believe the U.S. economy is growing too slowly.

Further, setting the appropriate policy would be somewhat easier if the Fed knew that only domestic factors determined either economic condition. But the Fed knows that is not likely the case.

One example: The Fed lowers short-term interest rates, as it did a month ago, to begin to stimulate the slowing U.S. economy, only to find that its counterpart, and the world's second most important central bank, the European Central Bank, is not. Of course, it's clear that the ECB is undertaking the monetary policy appropriate for the euro zone, but it's also clear that the policy hurts the U.S. economy's ability to grow at a time when the Fed is undertaking a policy to achieve that goal.

Another example: Conversely, when the Fed maintains short-term interest rates, as it did last year and early this year to control inflation, China, Asia, and most other emerging market economies continued to increase oil consumption -- a condition that helped push oil above $85 per barrel -- a major contributor to U.S. inflation. True, U.S. oil consumption is per capita the highest in the world, but few would deny that, along with U.S. demand, emerging/international market oil demand is stoking both oil's price and U.S. inflation. In other words, it hurt the Fed's inflation control effort previously, and it's hurting it today.

Fed Analysis: Given current conditions, it's likely the Fed on Wednesday will lower the federal funds rate by another quarter percentage point, to 4.50% from 4.75%. In September, the FOMC surprised most in the financial markets by lowering by one-half percentage point its key lending rate, to 4.75% from 5.25%, the first rate decrease in more than four years.

The monetary policy easing is expected to provide domestic stimulus to help recharge the U.S. economy while not re-stoking domestic inflationary pressures, qualified by the fact that international factors may hinder the Fed's goal.

Yesterday I was stunned to learn that Fed Chair Ben Bernanke had cut the Fed Funds rate 50 basis points to 4.75%. However, I had predicted that if he did cut the rate that much, the Dow would soar between 200 and 300 points. My high end estimate was 30 points too low.

What worried me the most about the cut was that the stated reason was pretty vague -- something about the risks to growth outweighing those to inflation -- and not supported by any numbers. Then I read this morning's New York Times [registration required] which suggested that at last month's Fed retreat in Jackson Hole, WY, economists presented economic forecasts based on the assumption that housing prices decline between 20% and 40% in the next several years.

I doubt the Fed's rate cut can do much to stop this problem -- although borrowing more money might delay the worst effects until the next president is in office. If this is the reason for the unexpectedly large interest rate cut, Fed officials should say so. While we have no power to decide interest rates, in a democracy I believe we at least have the right to know why those decisions are made.

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter.

As the Wall Street Journal covered [subscription required] today, Treasury Secretary Paulson made his first comments since the beginning of the 'downturn' in U.S. markets.

According to Mr. Paulson, "the economy and the markets are strong enough to absorb the losses." In his eyes, the recent repricing of risk was "inevitable" -- an argument that makes sense in hindsight but it seemed to catch many experts to surprise.

In Paulson's eyes there isn't much more that the U.S. government can do to help the economy and stock market. It has already tried to increase transparency among hedge funds, according to the article. However, the rest of the 'action potential' lies in the hands of Bernanke and the Fed. I've spoken to several very smart investors recently who are all becoming increasingly convinced that Bernanke is going to have to cut rates sometime in the next few months to save the credit markets. While this seems dramatic, the current devastation in the fixed income market, especially in the much-publicized subprime mortgage space, is rather incredible.

But the more important question to ask, in my opinion, is whether or not Paulson could have really said anything different. While I'm sure many would argue the answer to that question is an astounding yes, at the present time you have to reflect deeply on that question. Would he really say the United States could potentially enter a recession with the markets as fragile as they currently are? Would he really risk further weakening the US Dollar versus other world currencies? I'd argue the answer is a no.

As a girl who considers herself hip to the news, from Main Street to Wall Street to pop culture, I'm always on the lookout for trends. And the past few days I think I've spotted one, which I like to call "Too MAD Money." It's a riff on Greenspan's irrational exuberance. Let's look at the factors:

• The U.S. economy has fallen with a thunk off the top of the World Economic Forum's competitiveness survey. Replacing the States from its perch atop the economic heap: Switzerland. The U.S. is now sixth and Switzerland was lauded for its efficient markets and "sound institutional environment."
• This must mean that the U.S. is not, indeed, sound, or efficient. At least, not so much as Switzerland, Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Zoinks! Crushed by those efficient northern Europeans.
• At the same time, the U.S. indices are nearly all-time highs.
• At the same time, the U.S. economy is showing signs of a coming slowdown.
• And then, I read this headline: "Mad Money ... Mad Market." Albert Phung from Investopedia argues that Jim Cramer's famous "effect" is proof that the U.S. market does not behave efficiently. And suddenly, it all makes sense.

It's all Cramer's fault. Well, it's not really Cramer who's causing the irrationality and inefficiency, but his audience and the media types who fuel him. Because of the dozens of web sites who eagerly track his recommendations (as she puts her face in her hands, looking at her own blog), because of the millions who eagerly buy his recommended "Booyah Buys" and sell the ones which "don't have legs." Because of the endless promotion of some testosterone-fueled market-watcher by the CNBC engine and countless others. Because of you, who clicked on this link...

It's all our fault. We did this! Now get out there and buy rationally, people!

Yesterday I was raked over the hot coals by several readers that feel we are doomed by a housing bubble that I would not accept. See: Housing Truth from Main Street; which turned out to be quite a controversial post.

I stand by most of what I wrote. However, there were plenty of valuable insights that are worth reflection among the ranting and raving. A particular comment by David Gross, although not very deep is important for its simple summary of many comments. It stimulated a response from me that I thought was worthy of a separate post and further discussion.

David's Comment