If one is honest with oneself, she will recognize that the most exotic ingredients in her Italian-themed frozen foods are likely the plastic trays they're packaged in. A new recall for Lean Cuisine frozen chicken meals ("approximately" 879,565 pounds of them) offers the addition of one more exotic ingredient: "foreign matter," namely bits of hard plastic of unknown origin that caused at least one injury.

The company which packaged the products, Nestle Prepared Foods Company of Springville, Utah, is voluntarily recalling the products after several consumer complaints and the lone injury. The three meals that are part of the recall are the 10.5-ounce "chicken mediterranean" pictured here; 9.5-ounce "pesto chicken with bow-tie pasta" and 12.5-ounce "chicken tuscan." Further information about specific bar codes and sell-by dates can be found at the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service.

While this is in no way a serious health risk, the enormous size of the recall and the timing -- coming in an environment in which budget-conscious consumers are beginning to question the true "convenience," nutritional value and safety of packaged food -- will be somewhat harmful for the convenience food industry as a whole. As someone who is taking a more cautious eye toward the food she is feeding her family, I have been asking questions such as, "if pieces of hard plastic weren't even recognized until consumers complained, what invisible ingredients have been slipping through without reparation or admittance?" In food, that what you can't see; and don't recognize for many years; is the most harmful of all.

Archer-Daniels Midland (NYSE: ADM - option chain) shares are rising today after the Department of Agriculture lifted its corn production estimates and lowered its corn price estimates. The news is good for ADM since the company is a huge consumer of corn. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on ADM.

ADM opened this morning at $26.34. So far today the stock has hit a low of $26.04 and a high of $27.25. As of 12:30, ADM is trading at $27.09, up $0.75 (2.8%). The chart for ADM looks bullish and S&P gives ADM a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.

For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a December bull-put credit spread below the $22.50 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 22.0% return in just four months as long as HANS is above $22.50 at September expiration. ADM would have to fall by more than 16% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.

Tyson Foods (NYSE: TSN) will be grumbling a bit this week after spending the summer revising labels for its poultry products. Previously, the USDA said the chicken giant could label its chicken products "raised without antibiotics." Now the U.S. Department of Agriculture says that decision was in error.

So, instead of enlightening Tyson customers with a more natural marketing message for its fresh chicken products, the campaign introduced this summer will now be canceled and the labels will be pulled off those products.

According to the USDA, a food additive called ionophores is indeed fed to Tyson's chickens before they are processed. The USDA has classified ionophores as antibiotics before and said it would not change its policy, much to the chagrin of Tyson marketing executives.

However, Tyson executives say that ionophores are not antibiotics and that the FDA does not consider them to be antibiotics either. Who will win out here? If it's the USDA, then Tyson just wasted quite a bit of marketing money to tell customers something that wasn't true. Well, according to the USDA at least.

Agrium (NYSE: AGU) volatility is flat as AGU at record high on strong fertilizer demand. AGU, an agricultural retailer and fertilizer producer, closed at $54.38. AGU over all option implied volatility of 39 is near its 26-week average of 38 according to Track Data, suggesting nondirectional risk.

Terra Industries (NYSE: TRA) volatility is flat; TRA is near record on demand for nitrogen. TRA, an international producer of nitrogen products for industry and agriculture, closed at $31.26. TRA is expected to report EPS on 10/25. TRA over all option implied volatility of 52 is near its 26-week average of 50 according to Track Data, suggesting nondirectional risk.

Option update provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.

Personally, I don't feel a compelling need to know about where exactly my beef comes from. Yes, it would be interesting to know where those burgers I eat originate, but to me that's not essential information. That's not to say that I don't think about my food's place of origin, and I can understand the value of meat packing tracking. I'm just not in much of a position to do anything about it so I choose not to worry about it.

However, in 2002 a labeling law for meat was enacted as part of the Farm Bill. That law has yet to become enforceable. This does give me cause for concern because what I see here is that those people who find meat labeling a vastly more important issue than I do have been routinely thwarted in their attempts to make those laws a reality, and it seems perfectly clear to me that the whole issue is being controlled by carefully directed political contributions. The Democrat-controlled Congress will soon be addressing the issue. You might want to send them word of how you feel about it.

An expose in yesterday's The New York Times addresses the subject very eloquently and it brings to light some of the facts regarding how corporate cash has held the implementation of meat labeling requirements in check. Yes, I know full well that's the way things work on Capitol Hill but that certainly doesn't mean everyone's best interests are being served. When those political contributions blatantly override the will of the people, we need to take a good hard look at where those contributions come from and why.

There are two arguments being fielded against the proposition of meat labeling requirements. The first complaint regards the costs to implement such a program. That complaint is just plain stupid on its face. The USDA is already on the job, so we can add a penny a pound surcharge onto the price of meat and cut a couple perks from the legislative bodies. Yeah, that should do it.

The second argument calls meat labeling requirements a "protectionist proposition." I took just a moment to analyze that. Protectionist: One who seeks to provide or receive an act, theory, method or device of protection.

Yes, I think I can accept that.