<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Northeast Utilities: A Power Sector Gem]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/19/northeast-utilities-a-power-sector-gem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/19/northeast-utilities-a-power-sector-gem/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/19/northeast-utilities-a-power-sector-gem/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nu/" rel="tag">Northeast Utilities (NU)</a></p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/new_jersey_transit.jpg" alt="" />To be sure, today's equity market remains one that's filled with risks from near and far (such as in Europe) -- risks that can disrupt even the strongest stocks. However, if you're willing to assume some risk, consider utility Northeast Utilities (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/northeast-utilities/nu/nys">NU</a>), for the opportunity to net a modest capital gain, plus a dividend. <br />
<br />
Northeast's proposed merger with NStar (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/nstar/nst/nys">NST</a>) should close in the second half of 2011, and create one of the largest utility companies in the U.S. The deal should be accretive to earnings in 2011. NU, first discussed here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/06/northeast-utilities-arguably-one-of-the-safest-stocks-in-the-u/">on May 5, 2009</a> at a price of $21.48, boasts an annual dividend of $1.60.<br />
<br />
The new, larger company's name will be Northeast Utilities, and it will own six regulated gas and electric utilities operations in New England, primarily in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, serving 3.5 million customers.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/19/northeast-utilities-a-power-sector-gem/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Northeast Utilities: A Power Sector Gem</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/19/northeast-utilities-a-power-sector-gem/">Northeast Utilities: A Power Sector Gem</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/19/northeast-utilities-a-power-sector-gem/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19807510/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/19/northeast-utilities-a-power-sector-gem/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend stocks</category><category>electric company</category><category>power generation</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PPL Corp.: Well-Positioned for Electric Power Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/ppl-corp-well-positioned-for-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/ppl-corp-well-positioned-for-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/ppl-corp-well-positioned-for-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/ppl-logo.jpg" alt="PPL logo" />Utility gem PPL Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ppl-corporation/ppl/nys">PPL</a>), first discussed here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/ppl-corp-is-a-mix-of-safety-and-growth/">on May 26, 2009</a>, at a price of $30.56, has retreated <a href="http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Symbol=ppl&amp;Refer=http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details%3fSymbol%3dsu">about 10%</a> since September, to about $26, but just look on that dip as an opportunity to scoop-up shares of a superior utility.</p>
<p>PPL provides electricity to 1.4 million U.S. customers in eastern and central Pennsylvania, and has 19.0 megawatts (mw) of power generation capacity. The company also operates two power distribution companies in the United Kingdom, which serve about 2.6 million customers. PPL Energy Plus also markets power to customers in Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/ppl-corp-well-positioned-for-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>PPL Corp.: Well-Positioned for Electric Power Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/ppl-corp-well-positioned-for-growth/">PPL Corp.: Well-Positioned for Electric Power Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/ppl-corp-well-positioned-for-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19771677/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/21/ppl-corp-well-positioned-for-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>PPL</category><category>PPL Corp</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Southern Co.: Safety with Modest Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/14/the-southern-co-safety-with-modest-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/14/the-southern-co-safety-with-modest-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/14/the-southern-co-safety-with-modest-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/so/" rel="tag">Southern Company (SO)</a></p><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/light-bulb-by-blugeoner86.jpg" alt="" />Shares of utility The Southern Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/southern-company-the/so/nys">SO</a>), first discussed here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/19/the-southern-co-safety-and-decent-growth-are-hard-to-ignore/#continued">on June 19, 2009</a> at a price of $30.61, have pulled-back roughly in-sync with the Dow's spring retreat, but just look on that dip as an opportunity to scoop-up shares at a decent price. Here's why: <br />
<br />
The Southern Co. is likely to be top utility sector performer. The reason? Its Atlanta-area operations.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/14/the-southern-co-safety-with-modest-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Southern Co.: Safety with Modest Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/14/the-southern-co-safety-with-modest-growth/">The Southern Co.: Safety with Modest Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/14/the-southern-co-safety-with-modest-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19515660/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/14/the-southern-co-safety-with-modest-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>atlanta</category><category>electricity</category><category>southern company</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PPL Corp: Investors React Negatively After Acquisition]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/ppl-corp-investors-react-negatively-after-acquisition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/ppl-corp-investors-react-negatively-after-acquisition/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/ppl-corp-investors-react-negatively-after-acquisition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/lcorette.jpg" />The shares of utility PPL Corporation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ppl-corporation/ppl/nys">PPL</a>), which I first wrote about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/ppl-corp-is-a-mix-of-safety-and-growth/">on May 26, 2009</a>, at a price of $32.15, have totally misbehaved, and it's probably best to stand-aside at this juncture, pending additional performance data in the quarter ahead. If you own the shares, I'd hold them, but I wouldn't add to a position at this time. <br />
<br />
In late April, PPL Corp's shares fell significantly after it announced its purchase of Kentucky-based utilities Louisville Gas &amp; Electric and Kentucky Utilities for $7.625 billion, contingent on approvals. The consensus is that the deal will be (at best) modestly dilutive for the first year, and PPL's shares fell about $4 on the news.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/ppl-corp-investors-react-negatively-after-acquisition/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>PPL Corp: Investors React Negatively After Acquisition</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/ppl-corp-investors-react-negatively-after-acquisition/">PPL Corp: Investors React Negatively After Acquisition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 May 2010 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/ppl-corp-investors-react-negatively-after-acquisition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19476729/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/13/ppl-corp-investors-react-negatively-after-acquisition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy</category><category>power utility</category><category>PPL</category><category>PPL Corp</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tell-tale Stat: U.S. Factory Output Jumped In March]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/tell-tale-stat-u-s-factory-output-jumped-in-march/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/tell-tale-stat-u-s-factory-output-jumped-in-march/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/tell-tale-stat-u-s-factory-output-jumped-in-march/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/autoplant.jpg" />The compelling stat for investors in March's <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm">industrial production data</a> released Thursday by the U.S. Federal Reserve? Without question, the factory output component of the index, which jumped an impressive 0.9%.<br />
<br />
The top-line industrial production statistic indicated just a 0.1% rise in March -- to be sure, one that confirmed a nearly year-long expansion in industrial production -- but hardly a large move. The March rise was also well below the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">estimate of economists</a> surveyed by Bloomberg News, which forecast an 0.8% rise.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/tell-tale-stat-u-s-factory-output-jumped-in-march/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tell-tale Stat: U.S. Factory Output Jumped In March</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/tell-tale-stat-u-s-factory-output-jumped-in-march/">Tell-tale Stat: U.S. Factory Output Jumped In March</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/tell-tale-stat-u-s-factory-output-jumped-in-march/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19441330/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/15/tell-tale-stat-u-s-factory-output-jumped-in-march/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>industrial production</category><category>inthenews</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PPL Corp: A Utility for Challenging Times]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/ppl-corp-a-utility-for-challenging-times/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/ppl-corp-a-utility-for-challenging-times/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/ppl-corp-a-utility-for-challenging-times/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/light-bulb.jpg"  alt="" />Utility PPL Corp. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ppl-corporation/ppl/nys">PPL</a>), first written about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/01/ppl-corp-a-promising-utility-at-an-attractive-price/#continued">on May 26, 2009</a> at a price of $32.15, is a utility I still like, for several reasons.<br />
<br />
First and foremost, PPL's business model remains solid: steady, if unspectacular growth in its regulated Pennsylvania power market (1.4 million customer), coupled with stronger growth in unregulated (though more risky) power markets. PPL hopes the increased use of power supply contracts of varying duration will lessen that risk.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/ppl-corp-a-utility-for-challenging-times/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>PPL Corp: A Utility for Challenging Times</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/ppl-corp-a-utility-for-challenging-times/">PPL Corp: A Utility for Challenging Times</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/ppl-corp-a-utility-for-challenging-times/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19364420/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/18/ppl-corp-a-utility-for-challenging-times/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>electricity</category><category>power</category><category>PPL</category><category>PPL Corp</category><category>utilities</category><category>utility stocks</category><category>UtilityStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consider FPL Group, because the Gold Coast is still there, recession and all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/consider-fpl-group-because-the-gold-coast-is-still-there-reces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/consider-fpl-group-because-the-gold-coast-is-still-there-reces/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/consider-fpl-group-because-the-gold-coast-is-still-there-reces/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/light-bulb-by-blugeoner86.jpg" alt="" />Nary a good word can be said about this market in the first week of March 2009. The U.S. economy seems set to register at least an 18-month recession, and probably a longer one. U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner went to Capitol Hill Tuesday to essentially tell the U.S. Congress more money will be needed for the banking bailout, and Fed Chair Ben Bernanke did the same to brace elected officials for more, essential help for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">American International Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-international-group-inc/aig/nys">AIG</a>). As 'The Great One,' <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackie_Gleason">Jackie Gleason</a> would chime, "<span style="font-style: italic;">Oh, wonderful!"</span><br /><br />Translation: rough sledding, at best, for equities, and a defensive posture is the rule. Still, so long as one expects the U.S. economy to return to some semblance of normalcy -- and that's the view here -- there are bargains to be had for those investors who can tolerate moderate risk. And with the above in mind utility, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fpl-group-inc/fpl/nys">FPL Group</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fpl-group-inc/fpl/nys">FPL</a>) is worth a review.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/consider-fpl-group-because-the-gold-coast-is-still-there-reces/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consider FPL Group, because the Gold Coast is still there, recession and all</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/consider-fpl-group-because-the-gold-coast-is-still-there-reces/">Consider FPL Group, because the Gold Coast is still there, recession and all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/consider-fpl-group-because-the-gold-coast-is-still-there-reces/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1477680/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/03/consider-fpl-group-because-the-gold-coast-is-still-there-reces/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defensive stocks</category><category>Florida</category><category>FPL</category><category>FPL Group</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Choose Verizon (VZ), if you're just as cautious as its subscribers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/choose-verizon-vz-if-youre-just-as-cautious-as-its-subscribe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/choose-verizon-vz-if-youre-just-as-cautious-as-its-subscribe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/choose-verizon-vz-if-youre-just-as-cautious-as-its-subscribe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/verizon-vz-logo.gif" />This market isn't fit for most investors, but if you have the risk tolerance to own (or increase a position in) a stock or two, consider a utility. <br /><br />But not just any utility. We're talking a well-capitalized utility. With solid revenue streams. And a large, moneyed customer base. And dominate positions in key markets. Hey, this is not a market for 'experimental business models' and 'iffy' stock plays, which is why Verizon is worth a review.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/choose-verizon-vz-if-youre-just-as-cautious-as-its-subscribe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Choose Verizon (VZ), if you're just as cautious as its subscribers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/choose-verizon-vz-if-youre-just-as-cautious-as-its-subscribe/">Choose Verizon (VZ), if you're just as cautious as its subscribers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/choose-verizon-vz-if-youre-just-as-cautious-as-its-subscribe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458807/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/choose-verizon-vz-if-youre-just-as-cautious-as-its-subscribe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>broadband</category><category>cell phones</category><category>FiOS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>landlines</category><category>mobile phone service</category><category>utilities</category><category>Verizon</category><category>VZ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. utilities encounter a shocker: A dip in power demand]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-utilities-encounter-a-shocker-a-dip-in-power-demand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-utilities-encounter-a-shocker-a-dip-in-power-demand/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-utilities-encounter-a-shocker-a-dip-in-power-demand/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/duk/" rel="tag">Duke Energy (DUK)</a></p><a title="lightbulb by SideLong" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sidelong/135518489/"><img class="pc_img" height="240" alt="lightbulb by SideLong" hspace="4" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/47/135518489_7432e2c0b4_m.jpg" width="168" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>The latest trend in the utilities sector could deliver an unpleasant 'jolt' (pun intended) to electric power generation companies, if it continues.<br /><br />U.S. electricity consumption unexpectedly dropped in Q2 and Q3, on a year-over-year basis, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Wall Street Journal</span> reported Friday (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122722654497346099.html">subscription required</a>), although <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Journal</span> cautioned that the data is early and incomplete.<br /><br />Major electric power suppliers <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xcel-energy-inc/xel/nys">Xcel Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xcel-energy-inc/xel/nys">XEL</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/duke-energy-corporation/duk/nys">Duke Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/duke-energy-corporation/duk/nys">DUK</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-electric-power-company-inc/aep/nys">American Electric Power</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-electric-power-company-inc/aep/nys">AEP</a>) all reported declines in residential electricity use in recent quarters, compared to the previous year, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Journal</span> reported.<br /><strong><br />An electric puzzle</strong><br /><br />Economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Friday electricity demand is a function of more factors than one might assume. The economic cycle, seasons, weather extremes, demographics, household formation, increased efficiency, technological change, and even popular culture trends are among the major factors affecting electricity demand.<br /><br />Wang believes the major factor in the recent dip is the current U.S. recession. "I will defer to more-comprehensive U.S. Energy Department and power association data later, but I think without question the economic downturn is a major factor. When people lose jobs, many tend to give up housing and live with roommates or relatives. This decreases electricity use. Also, home foreclosures result in empty homes, which obviously use less energy than occupied homes."<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-utilities-encounter-a-shocker-a-dip-in-power-demand/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. utilities encounter a shocker: A dip in power demand</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-utilities-encounter-a-shocker-a-dip-in-power-demand/">U.S. utilities encounter a shocker: A dip in power demand</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-utilities-encounter-a-shocker-a-dip-in-power-demand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1379278/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/21/u-s-utilities-encounter-a-shocker-a-dip-in-power-demand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DUK</category><category>Duke Energy</category><category>EXL</category><category>inthenews</category><category>power generation</category><category>utilities</category><category>utilities sector</category><category>Xcel Energy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Industrial production falls for third time in four months]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/industrial-production-falls-for-third-time-in-four-months/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/industrial-production-falls-for-third-time-in-four-months/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/industrial-production-falls-for-third-time-in-four-months/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>U.S. industrial production fell 0.2% in May, <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/releases/G17/Current/default.htm">the U.S. Federal Reserve announced Tuesday</a>, its third drop in the past four months.<br /><br />Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected industrial production to rise 0.1% in May. Industrial production fell 0.7% in April.<br /><br />Further, manufacturing output was unchanged in May, the Fed said, while utilities output declined 1.8%, and mine output increased 0.1%. The Fed added that factory output was boosted by a small pickup in the index for motor vehicles and parts; the end in late May of a strike at a parts producer had little effect on vehicle output for the month.<br /><br />Also, capacity utilization declined to 79.4% in May from 79.6% in 79.7 in April. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg News had expected capacity utilization to total 79.7 in May. The May utilization rate is 1.6 percentage points below its average for 1972-2007 and is at its lowest level since November 2004. Capacity utilization totaled 80.3% in March and 80.9% one year ago, in May 2007.<br /><br /><strong>U.S. economy operating well below capacity</strong><br /><br />Economist David H. Wang said U.S. industrial production continues to operate well below capacity. "We are continuing to see a downward path of industrial production and this is not a good sign. Industrial production has declined for about one year, and this will weigh on commercial activity. It's also a major job loss area," Wang said. "The U.S. economy is complex and multi-faceted but it's hard for GDP to grow without industrial production increasing."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/industrial-production-falls-for-third-time-in-four-months/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Industrial production falls for third time in four months</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/industrial-production-falls-for-third-time-in-four-months/">Industrial production falls for third time in four months</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/industrial-production-falls-for-third-time-in-four-months/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1227751/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/17/industrial-production-falls-for-third-time-in-four-months/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>capacity utilization</category><category>factories</category><category>Fed</category><category>gdp</category><category>industrial production</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mining</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 10:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NRG Energy: A power play to recharge your portfolio]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/07/nrg-a-power-play-to-re-charge-your-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/07/nrg-a-power-play-to-re-charge-your-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/07/nrg-a-power-play-to-re-charge-your-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>A year or so ago, a 10% total annual return on equity would have been unsatisfactory for many investors.
<p>My, how the U.S. financial landscape has changed from April 2007! A 10% return today doesn't look so bad, and a company that can achieve that and more is utility NRG Energy.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nrg-energy-inc/nrg/nys">NRG Energy Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nrg-energy-inc/nrg/nys">NRG</a>) is a wholesale power generating company that owns and operates power plants with a net capacity of 22,880 megawatts. </p>
<p>The majority of NRG's revenue is from base load power. The significance? A stable cash flow. Further NRG's power source is largely natural gas-based, which is preferred, given likely additional regulations moving forward for coal-fired plants, as nations address climate change. NRG's power source mix is 45% natural gas, 34% coal, 16% oil, 5% nuclear. NRG's stable includes 175 power generation units at 49 power plants.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/07/nrg-a-power-play-to-re-charge-your-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NRG Energy: A power play to recharge your portfolio</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/07/nrg-a-power-play-to-re-charge-your-portfolio/">NRG Energy: A power play to recharge your portfolio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/07/nrg-a-power-play-to-re-charge-your-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1161072/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/07/nrg-a-power-play-to-re-charge-your-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defensive stocks</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NRG</category><category>NRG Energy</category><category>power generation</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE, Siemen AG, Vestas benefiting from growth in wind turbine use]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ge-siemen-ag-vestas-benefiting-from-growth-in-wind-turbine-use/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ge-siemen-ag-vestas-benefiting-from-growth-in-wind-turbine-use/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ge-siemen-ag-vestas-benefiting-from-growth-in-wind-turbine-use/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" alt="" />General Electric and Vestas Wind Systems are reaping the benefits as U.S. utilities assertively add generating capacity from renewable/alternative energy sources, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aCIDfi5bIza0&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Wednesday</a>.<br /><br />For example, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xcel-energy-inc/xel/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">XCel Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xcel-energy-inc/xel/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">XEL</a>), the U.S.'s largest provider of wind power, is buying 67 <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GE</a>) turbines for a Minnesota wind farm, and GE expects its turbine sales to increase 25% to $6 billion this year, Bloomberg News reported. GE was the largest supplier of wind turbines in 2007, with a 45% market share. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/siemens-a-g-adr/si/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Siemens AG </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/siemens-a-g-adr/si/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">SI</a>) and Vestas are two other major global manufacturers of wind turbines that should continue to benefit as wind power usage increases: each is opening manufacturing plants in the U.S. to accommodate increased wind energy-related sales.<br /><br />GE's shares gained 89 cents to $34.29, while Siemens AG rose 20 cents to $128.20 in Wednesday afternoon trading.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ge-siemen-ag-vestas-benefiting-from-growth-in-wind-turbine-use/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE, Siemen AG, Vestas benefiting from growth in wind turbine use</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ge-siemen-ag-vestas-benefiting-from-growth-in-wind-turbine-use/">GE, Siemen AG, Vestas benefiting from growth in wind turbine use</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aCIDfi5bIza0&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ge-siemen-ag-vestas-benefiting-from-growth-in-wind-turbine-use/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1138024/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ge-siemen-ag-vestas-benefiting-from-growth-in-wind-turbine-use/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy sources</category><category>American Wind Energy Association</category><category>electricity</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>power generation</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>SI</category><category>Siemens AG</category><category>turbines</category><category>utilities</category><category>utilities sector</category><category>Vestas</category><category>wind mills</category><category>wind power</category><category>XCel Energy</category><category>XEL</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ferrellgas Partners (FGP): Utility investors need to look closer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ferrellgas-partners-utility-investors-need-to-look-closer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ferrellgas-partners-utility-investors-need-to-look-closer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ferrellgas-partners-utility-investors-need-to-look-closer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ferrellgas-partners-l-p/fgp/nys">Ferrellgas Partners, L.P</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ferrellgas-partners-l-p/fgp/nys">FGP</a>), a huge propane distributor, recently reported <a href="http://www.ferrellgas.com/investor/InvestorTemplate.asp?PRTarget=PressReleases">Nov-Jan results</a>. Propane is still the heating source of choice for several million households. How is it that Ferrellgas saw a drop in gross profits during its winter quarter? Granted, the drop in gross profit was not huge, and revenues for the winter quarter increased 15% to $764 million. </p>
<p>But results like this should cause utility and energy stock investors to take a closer look at just how a utility company actually makes its money, particularly with the ongoing deregulation of many utilities. Does a utility or energy company make its money on sales of a commodity, or on renting out its distribution network? Or is the utility or energy company more of a finance company that makes (or loses) money based on its pricing of a commodity? <br /></p>
<p>Such seems to be the case with Ferrellgas Partners in its recent quarter. It lost money because it priced future delivery of propane without factoring in a steep rise in the cost of propane. There is no way to predict or control winter temperatures and resulting level of demand, but a company should be able to accurately hedge its own price contracts to account for fluctuations in demand in its own industry and price its risk accordingly. Failure to adequately price risk is what has led to the subprime mortgage mess. No one wants to see energy and utility companies, and their customers, suffer the same economic debacle.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ferrellgas-partners-utility-investors-need-to-look-closer/">Ferrellgas Partners (FGP): Utility investors need to look closer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ferrellgas-partners-utility-investors-need-to-look-closer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1137660/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/12/ferrellgas-partners-utility-investors-need-to-look-closer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.</category><category>FerrellgasPartners,L.p.</category><category>FGP</category><category>hedging contracts</category><category>HedgingContracts</category><category>propane distribution</category><category>propane heating</category><category>PropaneDistribution</category><category>PropaneHeating</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CIA warns of cyber attacks on utilities -- is Wall Street next?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/cia-warns-of-cyber-attacks-on-utilities-is-wall-street-next/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/cia-warns-of-cyber-attacks-on-utilities-is-wall-street-next/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/cia-warns-of-cyber-attacks-on-utilities-is-wall-street-next/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a></p><p>The <em>Washington Post</em> reported over the weekend that the CIA had <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/18/AR2008011803277.html?hpid=moreheadlines">warned U.S. utilities of the possibility of attacks</a>, or threats with extortion demands, via the internet. At a conference in New Orleans attended by security officials from governments, utilities, and companies such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">Chevron Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/chevron-corporation/cvx/nys">CVX</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c/bp/nys">BP</a>), a cybersecurity analyst broke with CIA disclosure polices to detail several recent cyber intrusions outside the United States, one case resulting in a power outage that affected several cities. </p>
<p>Increasingly sophisticated intrusions into corporate computer systems have cost companies worldwide more than $20 billion each year, according to some estimates. And extortion is a growing threat, with attackers radically increasing their take from online gambling sites, e-commerce sites, and banks, which pay up to prevent their sites from being shut down and to avoid public knowledge their sites have been hacked. </p>
<p>With the rising tide of cyber attacks on the infrastructure over the past year or so, and the vulnerability of the power grid, transportation systems, and big banks becoming increasingly clear, investors have to wonder how secure the exchanges are from extortion or efforts to manipulate the markets by individuals or organized groups. The <a href="http://www.computing.co.uk/computing/news/2192455/london-stock-exchange-hacking">London Stock Exchange suffered a cyber attack</a> this past June. Such attacks frequently originate from overseas, sometimes supported by foreign governments, and perpetrators can be next to impossible to track down and bring to justice.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/cia-warns-of-cyber-attacks-on-utilities-is-wall-street-next/">CIA warns of cyber attacks on utilities -- is Wall Street next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/cia-warns-of-cyber-attacks-on-utilities-is-wall-street-next/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1091636/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/cia-warns-of-cyber-attacks-on-utilities-is-wall-street-next/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BP</category><category>Chevron</category><category>CIA</category><category>CVX</category><category>cyber attacks</category><category>cyber security</category><category>inthenews</category><category>London Stock Exchange</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investors could very well get a positive charge from Exelon Corp.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/investors-could-very-well-get-a-positive-charge-from-exelon-corp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/investors-could-very-well-get-a-positive-charge-from-exelon-corp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/investors-could-very-well-get-a-positive-charge-from-exelon-corp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>The market's choppy / consolidating pattern continues, suggesting the need for an additional defensive play or two (or perhaps more). Further, the utilities sector fits the bill, and in this category Exelon Corp. is worth an evaluation.<br /><br />Via subsidiaries,<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exelon-corporation/exc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> Exelon Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exelon-corporation/exc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">EXC</a>) distributes electricity to 5.4 million customers in Northern Illinois (including Chicago) and southeastern Pennsylvania (including Philadelphia). EXC has 25.5 million megawatts of generating capacity and is also involved in wholesale energy sales/marketing. The company also has 480,000 natural gas customers. <br /><br />Further, analysts really like Exelon's non-regulated utility operations, which should boost revenue performance in the immediate years ahead. A rate compromise agreement passed by the State of Illinois also removes a potential cloud from the company's revenue picture. <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp?symbol=exc">The Reuters FY 2007/FY 2008 EPS consensus estimates</a> for EXC are $4.32 to $4.40.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/investors-could-very-well-get-a-positive-charge-from-exelon-corp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investors could very well get a positive charge from Exelon Corp.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/investors-could-very-well-get-a-positive-charge-from-exelon-corp/">Investors could very well get a positive charge from Exelon Corp.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/investors-could-very-well-get-a-positive-charge-from-exelon-corp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1090854/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/investors-could-very-well-get-a-positive-charge-from-exelon-corp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>defensive stocks</category><category>energy marketing</category><category>EXC</category><category>Exelon Corp.</category><category>power generation</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FPL Group's results may shine when others' don't]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/fpl-groups-results-may-shine-when-others-dont/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/fpl-groups-results-may-shine-when-others-dont/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/fpl-groups-results-may-shine-when-others-dont/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>With the U.S. economic landscape becoming more uncertain, it's prudent to add a defensive stock or two to your portfolio, and utility <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/f-p-l-group-inc/fpl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">FPL Group, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/f-p-l-group-inc/fpl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">FPL</a>) is worth an evaluation.<br /><br />FPL Group boasts the fundamentals analysts like to see in a utility company: steady cash flow, above-par customer growth, adequate generating capacity, and favorable power market conditions. Further, analysts also like the cooperative regulatory environment in Florida, FPL's primary state, and the company's 2.3% dividend. With operations in 24 states, FPL has diversified operationally, but the focal point, for investors, is its Florida market: 4.4 million customers, and ample land for commercial and residential growth. <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp?symbol=fpl">The Reuters FY 2007/FY 2008 EPS consensus estimates for</a> FPL are $3.46 to $3.88.<br /><br />The risks? Analysts are keeping an eye on Florida's population growth and household formation for signs of any changes in long-term trends. <br /><br /><strong>Stock Analysis:</strong> FPL Group is a moderate-risk stock not suitable for low-risk investors. Investors with an investment horizon longer than 2 years should be rewarded from FPL's shares. Sell/Stop Loss if you were to purchase shares in this company: $48.<br /><br />Disclosure: Lazzaro has no positions in stocks. In addition to private real estate holdings, he owns corporate and municipal bonds, and cash certificates of deposit.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/fpl-groups-results-may-shine-when-others-dont/">FPL Group's results may shine when others' don't</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/fpl-groups-results-may-shine-when-others-dont/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1086678/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/fpl-groups-results-may-shine-when-others-dont/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Florida</category><category>FPL</category><category>FPL Group</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>The odds of a 2007 Energy Bill passing the Democratic Party-led U.S. Congress, with President Bush's blessing, "Are still likely," according to a Washington-based, public policy lobbyist with knowledge of the matter.<br /><br />"The bill will need a few revisions, but I'd say it's a 70/30 go, in favor of the bill being signed by the president," the lobbyist told Bloggingstocks Tuesday, on condition he not be identified by name.<br /><br />The lobbyist, who represents primarily Democratic Party-based constituencies, said the the bill's renewable energy component and potential tax increases remain the hangups in the bill.<br /><br /> <strong>Modification likely</strong><br /><br />"More than likely President Bush will get the renewable energy component modified, but the Democrats may gain extra footing with better solar/wind energy credits," he said.<br /><br />The bill current would require utilities to generate more power from renewable energy. Lawmakers from the Southeast U.S. have said they're concerned that utilities in their states will not be able to meet the requirement, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119674224083012902.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">due to a lack of wind power,</a><em> The Wall Street Journal</em> reported.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/">Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1054686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 presidential election</category><category>biofuels</category><category>Bush</category><category>CAFE</category><category>cars</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>electricity</category><category>energy bill</category><category>environment</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>gas tax</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>light trucks</category><category>mpg</category><category>natural gas</category><category>President Bush</category><category>presidential election</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>Republicans</category><category>solar energy</category><category>SUVs</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>utilities</category><category>voters</category><category>wind power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE wants incentives to help nuclear energy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/ge-ge-wants-incentives-to-help-nuclear-energy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/ge-ge-wants-incentives-to-help-nuclear-energy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/ge-ge-wants-incentives-to-help-nuclear-energy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hit/" rel="tag">Hitachi,Ltd ADR (HIT)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/ge-general-electric-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The US government hopes that a large number of nuclear plants will be built in the US over the next 20 years to cut the country's need for oil. But <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) CEO Jeffrey Immelt says they will not be built without incentives from the Feds.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0338c4e2-9621-11dc-b7ec-0000779fd2ac.html">According to</a> the<em> FT, "</em>Immelt said only five to 10 US nuclear power projects were likely to go ahead unless there was a carbon-pricing framework to create incentives for utilities to build more." That may be true, but GE should be quiet about championing aid for building those facilities. GE and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hitachi-limited/hit/nys">Hitachi</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hitachi-limited/hit/nys">HIT</a>) have a joint venture to build nuclear plants, and the parties would not want to be seen as sell-serving. </p>
<p>The comments raise a difficult issue. The government and utilities both know that the long-term future of cheap oil looks bad. But building nuclear plants take years, is expensive, and requires passing government safety standards. Over the next decade it may actually be cheaper to continue to use fossil fuels even it the price of oil stays high.</p>
<p>GE will make a lot of money on the move to nuclear fuel, but that does not mean that its call for government help is wrong.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/ge-ge-wants-incentives-to-help-nuclear-energy/">GE wants incentives to help nuclear energy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0338c4e2-9621-11dc-b7ec-0000779fd2ac.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/ge-ge-wants-incentives-to-help-nuclear-energy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1043268/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/ge-ge-wants-incentives-to-help-nuclear-energy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ELECTRIC UTILITIES</category><category>ElectricUtilities</category><category>ENERGY</category><category>ENERGY POLICY</category><category>EnergyPolicy</category><category>GE</category><category>GE ENERGY</category><category>GeEnergy</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>hit</category><category>hitachi</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NUCLEAR POWER</category><category>NUCLEAR REACTORS</category><category>NuclearPower</category><category>NuclearReactors</category><category>UTILITIES</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[October industrial output falls 0.5%, most since January]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/october-industrial-output-falls-0-5-most-since-january/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/october-industrial-output-falls-0-5-most-since-january/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/october-industrial-output-falls-0-5-most-since-january/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>Industrial Production fell 0.5% in October, considerably worse than the consensus estimate of a 0.1% production gain, <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/">the U.S. Federal Reserve announced</a> Friday. It was the largest decline in IP since January 2007. Industrial Production rose 0.2% in September.<br /><br />Meanwhile, capacity utilization --- which measures the percent of plants in use --- fell to 81.7% in October from 82.2% in September. Analysts had expected a 0.1%-0.3% rise in the utilization rate. <br /><br />Production at factories declined 0.4%, utility production declined 1.6%, and mining output fell 0.6%. Also telling: production of consumer durable goods dropped 0.8%.<br /><br />Analysts said the October industrial production decline adds to the argument that the U.S. housing sector's woes - - the most serious housing slump in more than a decade - - are beginning to spill over into the broader economy: <br /><br />"The October industrial production statistic certainly is a disappointment. Combined with lower capacity utilization, it suggests the economy is slowing, and it's something that has to concern the Fed," economist M. David Chandler told Bloggingstocks. "This puts added focus on the November and December stats. If we see industrial production slowing in those two months, Q4 will come in very, very weak, and the U.S. economy will be growing at near-stall levels."<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/october-industrial-output-falls-0-5-most-since-january/">October industrial output falls 0.5%, most since January</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/october-industrial-output-falls-0-5-most-since-january/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1041708/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/october-industrial-output-falls-0-5-most-since-january/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>capacity utilization</category><category>durable goods</category><category>factories</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing</category><category>industrial production</category><category>mines</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>recession</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>utilities</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Exelon (EXC) finds security officers dozing at nuclear plant]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/exelon-finds-security-officers-dozing-at-nuclear-plant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/exelon-finds-security-officers-dozing-at-nuclear-plant/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/exelon-finds-security-officers-dozing-at-nuclear-plant/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p>       Security guards at an<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exelon-corporation/exc/nys"> Exelon Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exelon-corporation/exc/nys">EXC</a>) nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania were found sleeping on the job, according to media reports. The Chicago-based utility company said it dropped Wackenhut as security contractor for its Peach Bottom plant and is reviewing the security firm's work at other company reactors, according to <em><a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/breaking/business_breaking/20070924_Exelon_terminates_security_firm_whose_guards_taped_sleeping_at_nuclear_plant.html">The Philadelphia Inquirer,</a></em></p>
<p><em>        </em>This couldn't have come at a worst time for the nuclear power industry whose reputation has improved over the past few years as a lesser evil to global warming-causing coal-fired power plants. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nrg-energy-inc/nrg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NRG Energy Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nrg-energy-inc/nrg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews ">NRG</a>) is even proposing to build its first nuclear power plant <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/25/washington/25nuke.html?ref=business">in almost 30 years</a>. But every time the nuclear power industry takes one step forward, it takes two steps back. </p>
<p>        In Exelon's case, the embarrassment was captured on video by another security guard over several months and sent to New York television station WCBS-TV, <em>The Inquirer</em> said. The incident, involving fewer than 10 workers, is investigated by the company and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the paper said.</p>
<p>        Exelon, of course, was mortified by the video.</p>
<p>      "This is not acceptable and we will not tolerate it," said Exelon Generation Chief Operating Officer Chris Crane in a<a href="http://www.exeloncorp.com/NR/exeres/1243FD68-FF3D-4162-8B3F-2544D431C638.htm"> press release</a>. "I want to be clear that nothing has happened at Peach Bottom that represents a security or safety threat to the public. We are dealing with unacceptable behavior, and we will fix it."</p>
<p>        What's scary is that it's happened before. Workers were caught napping at the control room of the same nuclear power plant in the late 1980s, according to the <em><a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE7D6113EF937A15757C0A96E948260">New York Times</a></em>.</p>
<p>        Those that don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/exelon-finds-security-officers-dozing-at-nuclear-plant/">Exelon (EXC) finds security officers dozing at nuclear plant</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.philly.com/inquirer/breaking/business_breaking/20070924_Exelon_terminates_security_firm_whose_guards_taped_sleeping_at_nuclear_plant.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/exelon-finds-security-officers-dozing-at-nuclear-plant/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/997411/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/25/exelon-finds-security-officers-dozing-at-nuclear-plant/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comed</category><category>exc</category><category>nuclear power</category><category>NuclearPower</category><category>peach bottom</category><category>PeachBottom</category><category>peco</category><category>utilities</category><category>wackehut</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:41:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
