<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[United Continental Lifted by Union Agreement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://ir.unitedcontinentalholdings.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=83680&amp;p=irol-IRHome"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="United Continental (UAL) logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/new-ual-logo.jpg" /></a>United Continental Holdings (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/united-continental-holdings-inc/ual/nys">UAL</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/united-continental-holdings-inc/ual/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today after <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/airlines-gain-at-open-led-by-united-continental-2010-12-30">Continental Airlines announced its fleet service employees ratified their collective bargaining agreement with the company</a>. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on UAL.</p>
<p>UAL opened this morning at $23.60. So far today the stock has hit a low of $23.50 and a high of $23.99. As of 12:15, UAL is trading at $23.86 up 0.40 (1.7%). The chart for UAL looks bullish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives UAL a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy ranking.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>United Continental Lifted by Union Agreement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/">United Continental Lifted by Union Agreement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19781819/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/united-continental-lifted-by-union-agreement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deal</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>labor</category><category>options</category><category>UAL</category><category>union</category><category>United Continental Holdings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Southwest Airlines (LUV) reaches tentative contract with union ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/southwest-airlines-luv-reaches-tentative-contract-with-union/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/southwest-airlines-luv-reaches-tentative-contract-with-union/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/southwest-airlines-luv-reaches-tentative-contract-with-union/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/luv-southwest-airlines-logo.jpg" />Late Friday night, Southwest Airlines Co. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys" target="_blank">LUV</a>) reached a <a href="http://www.southwest.com/about_swa/press/prindex.html" target="_blank">tentative agreement</a> with the Transport Workers Union (TWU) Local 555, which represents 7,780 ground workers, including those employed in operations, on ramps, as well as freight workers. The deal comes after more than 13 months of negotiations. <br /><br />The tentative deal, which has yet to be voted on by all TWU members, would run for three years, through June 30, 2011 (the current contract opened for changes on June 30 of last year). <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/southwest-airlines-luv-reaches-tentative-contract-with-union/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Southwest Airlines (LUV) reaches tentative contract with union </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/southwest-airlines-luv-reaches-tentative-contract-with-union/">Southwest Airlines (LUV) reaches tentative contract with union </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.star-telegram.com/business/story/1230124.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/southwest-airlines-luv-reaches-tentative-contract-with-union/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1475151/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/southwest-airlines-luv-reaches-tentative-contract-with-union/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>luv</category><category>negotiations</category><category>southwest airlines</category><category>SouthwestAirlines</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will President-elect Obama start a wave of labor unrest?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/obamapict..jpg" />There are 200 workers sitting-in at a Chicago factory that they claim has stiffed them. And President-elect Obama supports their goals. This raises many questions: Is the sit-in illegal? If so, is Obama supporting an illegal action? More importantly, is Obama inadvertently encouraging workers around the country to pursue similar tactics?</p>
<p>At issue here is <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ildwrFjwHYjvJPX2edZgBnNb8EEQD94UFKP80">Republic Windows and Doors</a>, a Chicago manufacturer that laid off its 200 workers last week and has failed to assure them that it will pay them the severance and vacation money they earned. The workers have responded by sitting-in on the factory floor. Obama said, "The workers who are asking for the benefits and payments that they have earned, I think they're absolutely right and understand that what's happening to them is reflective of what's happening across this economy," according to <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ildwrFjwHYjvJPX2edZgBnNb8EEQD94UFKP80"><em>AP</em></a>.</p>
<p>I have no legal training, however, it looks to me like a sit-in is a form of trespassing -- assuming that the workers are no longer employees of the company. (A <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ildwrFjwHYjvJPX2edZgBnNb8EEQD94UFKP80">VP of the worker's union</a> said "We expected to go to jail.") My reading of Obama's comment suggests that he supports the workers' goals -- which is to get the money to which they're legally entitled -- while taking no position on the legality of their sit-in. The question is whether other aggrieved workers will miss this subtlety and view Obama's statement as an implicit endorsement of the workers' tactics.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will President-elect Obama start a wave of labor unrest?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/">Will President-elect Obama start a wave of labor unrest?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1394259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/will-president-elect-obama-start-a-wave-of-labor-unrest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>BarackObama</category><category>economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>obama</category><category>republic windows and doors</category><category>RepublicWindowsAndDoors</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing averts engineering strike]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/boeing-averts-engineering-strike/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/boeing-averts-engineering-strike/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/boeing-averts-engineering-strike/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/boeing-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><font color="#0072bc">BA</font></a>) and its engineering union have <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aV8UtI95_gN8&amp;refer=home">come to terms on a contract</a>. This is good news for Boeing and its workers. Boeing can continue designing aircraft and its engineers can enjoy a raise. Considering the economic climate in which this contract was negotiated, it is a testimony to Boeing's financial prospects that it was able to increase their pay. With a $276 billion backlog, Boeing could be among the healthiest companies around.</p>
<p>What are the terms of the deal? Boeing employs 20,500 Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace (SPEEA) workers who are well paid already: 13,900 Boeing engineers average $88,000 annually and 6,600 technical workers make $67,000. The new contract offers 5% annual raises, higher pension payments and overtime rates, and gives workers more input concerning outsourcing decisions. But SPEEA members will pay $200 a year more for improved health care. </p>
<p>While this contract settlement is good news, it is less critical to Boeing's operations than the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/">52-day strike</a> it settled last month with Boeing's machinists that cost $10 million a day. That's because the machinists were building aircraft before they went on strike, whereas the engineers are largely designing future ones. Nevertheless, both SPEEA and the machinists agreed to four year contracts -- a year longer than usual. This means that Boeing can now get back to work satisfying the prodigious demand for its products.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/boeing-averts-engineering-strike/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boeing averts engineering strike</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/boeing-averts-engineering-strike/">Boeing averts engineering strike</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aV8UtI95_gN8&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/boeing-averts-engineering-strike/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1388419/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/02/boeing-averts-engineering-strike/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ba</category><category>boeing</category><category>engineeris</category><category>inthenews</category><category>strike</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing about to put its labor woes behind it -- for now]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-about-to-put-its-labor-woes-behind-it-for-now/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-about-to-put-its-labor-woes-behind-it-for-now/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-about-to-put-its-labor-woes-behind-it-for-now/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/boeingdreamliner.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><font color="#0072bc">The Boeing Company</font></a><font color="#0072bc"> </font>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><font color="#0072bc">BA</font></a>) just reached a tentative agreement with its <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aqS9AdtLEfkw&amp;refer=home">20,500</a>-member engineering union, the Society of Professional Engineers in Aerospace (SPEEA). This puts to rest the labor woes that cast a shadow over the company beginning in September. On November 1, Boeing settled a 54 day strike with its 27,000 member machinists union. And today, Boeing looks like it will avert a strike with SPEEA if the parties sign a contract by December 1.</p>
<p>In the negotiations, SPEEA wanted a specific limit on subcontracting engineering work and Boeing wanted to make sure that contract improvements would be affordable if there was a slowdown and that it would have outsourcing flexibility to stay competitive. Boeing initially asked engineers to pay more of their health care costs and for new engineers to accept a 401(k)-style retirement plan rather than the current defined-benefit pension program.</p>
<p>Boeing engineers are well-paid. 13,000 of them in Washington state, Oregon, Utah and California make an average of <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aqS9AdtLEfkw&amp;refer=home">$88,000</a> a year, and its 7,000 technical workers average $67,000. But SPEEA wanted more -- <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aqS9AdtLEfkw&amp;refer=home">10%</a> annual raises through 2011, more vacation days, higher overtime rates, a restoration of early retiree medical benefits and changes to the health-care and pension plans.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-about-to-put-its-labor-woes-behind-it-for-now/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boeing about to put its labor woes behind it -- for now</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-about-to-put-its-labor-woes-behind-it-for-now/">Boeing about to put its labor woes behind it -- for now</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-about-to-put-its-labor-woes-behind-it-for-now/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1372703/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/14/boeing-about-to-put-its-labor-woes-behind-it-for-now/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aircraft</category><category>boeing</category><category>seattle</category><category>strikes</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing reaches deal with machinists. Is its engineering union next?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p>After a 52-day strike, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><font color="#0072bc">Boeing Co.</font></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys"><font color="#0072bc">BA</font></a>) has reached a tentative deal with its <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE49R0IL20081028?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&amp;sp=true">27,000</a> member machinists union. <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/385222_boeingstrike28.html">Tentative details</a> suggest that workers will get a 15% wage increase over three years, an $8,000 bonus over four years, and a freeze of medical costs at 2005 levels. Furthermore, the new contract limits the amount of work that can be outsourced and will last a year longer than the previous pact. But even though the contract has not been ratified, this is good news for Boeing and its workers. </p>
<p>Limiting outsourcing could be good for Boeing and the workers depending on how it's accomplished. One of the reasons for the delay in delivering its very popular 787 aircraft was that Boeing outsourced the majority of the design and manufacture of the components and later discovered that it was not doing enough to manage those subcontractors. As a result, Boeing suffered unpleasant surprises in its delivery schedule.</p>
<p>If Boeing and its machinists agreed to give the union a chance to bid on work under consideration to be outsourced, then both parties might be better off. That's because if the union offered a competitive price and excellent quality, Boeing would likely find it easier to manage its union workers than those of a subcontractor located half way around the world.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boeing reaches deal with machinists. Is its engineering union next?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/">Boeing reaches deal with machinists. Is its engineering union next?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE49R0IL20081028?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0&amp;sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1354851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-reaches-deal-with-machinists-is-its-engineering-union-ne/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>boeing 787</category><category>Boeing787</category><category>iinthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing settles strike too late]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-settles-strike-too-late/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-settles-strike-too-late/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-settles-strike-too-late/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) settled its seven-week old strike with machinists agreeing to a four-year contract. In the meantime, the company has lost precious time building planes including its Dreamliner, which is already over a year late for its first delivery. World airlines that have ordered the new aircraft are already in a snit.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122515676343074673.html?mod=testMod">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "During the standoff, both sides dug in over issues such as job security and who had ultimate authority to run the factories, even as the national economy was undergoing a major upheaval." In other words, Boeing undercut the value of its shares when it could have settled on a similar deal a month ago. During most negotiations management knows how far it is willing to go, but holds out hoping labor will back down. In this case, that did not happen.</p>
<p>While Boeing management has been fiddling around, the company's stock has dropped to $42, near a 52-week low, and down from a period high of almost $99. Boeing faces angry customers, many of whom are asking for compensation for planes that will be late.</p>
<p>Boeing let labor shut it down while the economy went to hell in a hand-basket and its rival Airbus took whatever advantage of that it could. Boeing has a huge back-order of planes. Giving into the union would not have cost it much in profits. It has too many sales to fulfill.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-settles-strike-too-late/">Boeing settles strike too late</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122515676343074673.html?mod=testMod>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-settles-strike-too-late/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1354820/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/28/boeing-settles-strike-too-late/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>boeing</category><category>dreamliner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>machinists strike</category><category>MachinistsStrike</category><category>strike</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing now regretting strike]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/boeing-now-regretting-strike/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/boeing-now-regretting-strike/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/boeing-now-regretting-strike/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p>The fight between <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) and its machinists may go on a long, long time. While that may be bad for the union, it is much worse for Boeing. Its customers expect prompt delivery of fuel-efficient planes, especially the new Dreamliner. Boeing's management gambled on getting the union to knuckle under and lost.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122229111782072635.html?mod=testMod">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "As far as our members are concerned, we are in this one for the long haul," said Mark Blondin, aerospace coordinator and lead negotiator for the 26,800 machinists. The statement does not sound conciliatory.</p>
<p>Shareholders are getting the worst of it. Boeing trades at about $57, down from a 52-week high over over $107. With delivery delays, revenue is certain to drop.</p>
<p>Boeing's case with the unions is weak. The company claims it cannot give machinists a good three-year deal because earnings may not be strong that far out. With the company's tremendous backlog, it would be hard to imagine that being true.</p>
<p>Boeing's management will not be remembered well by history. They thought they had leverage in a situation where they had almost none.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/">24/7 Wall St.</a> </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/boeing-now-regretting-strike/">Boeing now regretting strike</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/boeing-now-regretting-strike/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1324153/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/25/boeing-now-regretting-strike/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>boeing</category><category>dreamliner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>strike</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boeing union votes to strike -- management's mistake]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/04/boeing-union-votes-to-strike-managements-mistake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/04/boeing-union-votes-to-strike-managements-mistake/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/04/boeing-union-votes-to-strike-managements-mistake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) has been gambling that its machinist union would back down from further wage and benefit demands. Instead, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122050470884498639.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">according to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>,<em> </em>the aircraft company's largest labor union "voted to strike Wednesday night, but the union agreed to postpone a walkout for 48 hours after federal mediators urged both sides to return to the bargaining table."</p>
<p>If the employees walk, the delays in delivering the company's new Dreamliner flagship product could be pushed back again. The launch has already been postponed three times. Airline customers are mad enough that some are asking for compensation because Boeing has not hit its schedules.</p>
<p>Boeing's argument is that it cannot be saddled with high future labor costs. If its business slows down, its margins could be hurt. But the union members can read Boeing press releases. The company has a substantial back order of planes which should feed earnings for the next decade. Boeing is also saying that growth in the Chinese market could help support its business for the next twenty years.</p>
<p>Boeing can afford to pay the union members a bit more. It can't afford a strike.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/04/boeing-union-votes-to-strike-managements-mistake/">Boeing union votes to strike -- management's mistake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122050470884498639.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/04/boeing-union-votes-to-strike-managements-mistake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1304058/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/04/boeing-union-votes-to-strike-managements-mistake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>boeing</category><category>dreamliner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A strike at Boeing, a mistake by management]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/a-strike-at-boeing-a-mistake-by-management/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/a-strike-at-boeing-a-mistake-by-management/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/a-strike-at-boeing-a-mistake-by-management/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2940314220080829">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2940314220080829">BA</a>) can't take a strike. It has too much depending on the launch of its new Dreamliner. That launch has been delayed three times and carriers are already asking for compensation for their costs due to the fuel-efficient plane being behind schedule.</p>
<p>Boeing has been going at it with its large machinists union and it looks like the two sides have made no progress. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2940314220080829">According to</a> <em>Reuters, </em>the company's "largest labor union said on Friday it advised its members to reject the company's final contract proposal and go forward with a strike this week that could cost the plane maker $3 billion a month."</p>
<p>Boeing's logic is that it does not want to face high costs in the future when its revenue may be lower. But that logic is deeply flawed, and the union knows it. Boeing has a heavy delivery schedule that goes out at least five years for the Dreamliner and other planes. The company also says that deliveries over the next two decades will be strong due largely to demand in Asia.</p>
<p>Boeing management is making a tactical error and shareholders will pay for it. The stock is at $65, but the strike will send it to $50.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com</em></p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/a-strike-at-boeing-a-mistake-by-management/">A strike at Boeing, a mistake by management</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN2940314220080829>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/a-strike-at-boeing-a-mistake-by-management/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1299835/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/02/a-strike-at-boeing-a-mistake-by-management/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>boeing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>strike</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A strike at Boeing? An advantage for Airbus]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/a-strike-at-boeing-an-advantage-for-airbus/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/a-strike-at-boeing-an-advantage-for-airbus/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/a-strike-at-boeing-an-advantage-for-airbus/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p><img height="160" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/boeingdreamliner.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) has been furiously negotiating with its machinist's union to avoid a strike vote by them that could come as early as September 3. Labor's greatest concerns is that Boeing has made a lot of money over the past several years, and workers have seen very little benefit from that. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a1R0FW2SiolU&amp;refer=home">According to Bloomberg</a>, "The union says workers haven't had raises, except for cost-of-living increases, since 2004 and deserve to share in Boeing's $10.7 billion in profit since then." Boeing is taking the standard large company position: It cannot afford to sharply increase benefits without putting itself in jeopardy if its business slows.</p>
<p>Boeing might want to sharpen its pencil. A strike could cost it another delay for the launch of its new Dreamliner. It has already pushed back that date three times. Airline customers are so upset that some of them have asked for compensation. More delays could up the request for "damages" from carriers who still need the more fuel-efficient airplane.</p>
<p>The winner in a Boeing strike will probably be Airbus. It has had delays of some of its own products, including its huge A380 jumbo jet. But, most of those issues seem to be behind the European company. If Boeing can't deliver planes, Airbus can pick up market share.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/a-strike-at-boeing-an-advantage-for-airbus/">A strike at Boeing? An advantage for Airbus</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/a-strike-at-boeing-an-advantage-for-airbus/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1293006/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/a-strike-at-boeing-an-advantage-for-airbus/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Airbus</category><category>BA</category><category>Boeing</category><category>Dreamliner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>strike</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A strike may be Boeing's (BA) next problem]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/a-strike-may-be-boeings-ba-next-problem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/a-strike-may-be-boeings-ba-next-problem/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/a-strike-may-be-boeings-ba-next-problem/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a></p><p>Airlines may not get the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">Boeing</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-boeing-company/ba/nys">BA</a>) Dreamliner on its new revised schedule after all. The plane has been delayed three times because of manufacturing and supplier glitches. If Boeing has problems with one of its unions, it might have to push back the launch date again. Some airlines are already asking Boeing for compensation for the late deliveries.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121926650741557919.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "With its aircraft order books so full that some customers must wait as long as five years for deliveries, Boeing can ill afford a strike -- especially one that could further delay the rollout of its new 787 Dreamliner jet."</p>
<p>At the center of the negotiations are pay and pensions, making them little different from most such talks. But the solution for both sides could involve an incentive.</p>
<p>Boeing does not want to be faced with a strike that could hurt its revenue. The unions want a bigger piece of Boeing's sales pie. Boeing should return to the bargaining table with a simple proposal. If its new jets are delivered on time, wages will go up at a rate close to the union's requests. If not, the increases will be lower.</p>
<p>Boeing could set up a partnership with its labor force driven by the common goal of product launches. That is better than a strike that does neither the union nor Boeing any good.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/a-strike-may-be-boeings-ba-next-problem/">A strike may be Boeing's (BA) next problem</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121926650741557919.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/a-strike-may-be-boeings-ba-next-problem/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1290794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/a-strike-may-be-boeings-ba-next-problem/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BA</category><category>boeing</category><category>dreamliner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart's Republican executives at war with its Democratic customers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/wal-marts-republican-executives-at-war-with-its-democratic-cust/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/wal-marts-republican-executives-at-war-with-its-democratic-cust/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/wal-marts-republican-executives-at-war-with-its-democratic-cust/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/wal-mart-employee.jpg" />The <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121755649066303381.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">Wall Street Journal</a></em> reports that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) is warning its store managers against an Obama victory in November. Why? because Wal-Mart executives worry that Obama will boost the power of unions and that unionized Wal-Mart stores will lead to higher worker pay -- and higher prices for Wal-Mart customers.</p>
<p>I can understand why Wal-Mart executives would want to keep President Bush's policies in place for another four years. After all, those low taxes on the top 1% help enrich Wal-Mart brass. I am not suggesting that all Wal-Mart customers are Republicans, not at all, but I do believe that most people who shop at Wal-Mart cannot afford to buy their shoes at Neiman Marcus. And these middle- and lower-income Wal-Mart shoppers are the natural beneficiaries of Democratic policies such as Obama's plan for a middle-class tax cut.</p>
<p>Wal-Mart is clearly trying to be on both sides of this election. The <em>Journal</em> reports that it's reduced its share of contributions to Republican candidates from 98% in 1996 to 52% in 2008 -- giving 48% of its $2.2 million in political contributions to Democrats this year. It also has directors who have been big Clinton supporters, including Hillary Clinton herself who served on its board from <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/us/politics/20walmart.html">1986 to 1992</a> and Aida Alvarez, who worked in <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/officerProfile?symbol=WMT.N&amp;officerId=778134">Bill Clinton's cabinet from 1997 to 2001</a> and has been a Wal-Mart director since 2006.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/wal-marts-republican-executives-at-war-with-its-democratic-cust/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wal-Mart's Republican executives at war with its Democratic customers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/wal-marts-republican-executives-at-war-with-its-democratic-cust/">Wal-Mart's Republican executives at war with its Democratic customers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:09:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121755649066303381.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/wal-marts-republican-executives-at-war-with-its-democratic-cust/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1272699/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/wal-marts-republican-executives-at-war-with-its-democratic-cust/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Employee Free Choice Act</category><category>EmployeeFreeChoiceAct</category><category>employees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>obama</category><category>presidntial elections</category><category>PresidntialElections</category><category>union</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Writers strike over more money, searching for equal pain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-over-more-money-searching-for-equal-pain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-over-more-money-searching-for-equal-pain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-over-more-money-searching-for-equal-pain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p>Yes it's true -- just like you and me, <em><strong>the writers want more money</strong></em>, and since they did not get it <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/05/business/media/05strike.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">they are walking out</a>. Actually having some keen familiarity with Hollywood, I would find it hard to believe that after not striking since 1988, writers could actually come to any agreement with producers without one now.</p>
<p>First of all, the world is changing rapidly and whatever agreements they settled on in the past is most assuredly not attuned to the media landscape of today. The writers feel they negotiated a borderline contract before, and do not want to give up any revenue opportunities now.</p>
<p>Producers have made more money from the internet and DVD sales than they have in the past, but they have seen weaker box office attendance and are getting burned badly by DVD pirates burning cheap discs for sale at great discount to the legitimate copies.</p>
<p>The last time there was a strike, we are told the industry lost $500 million. I have no way of verifying the legitimacy of that figure because in Hollywood (as those in the know can attest), the most creative talent is found in the accounting department, not on the screen.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-over-more-money-searching-for-equal-pain/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Writers strike over more money, searching for equal pain</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-over-more-money-searching-for-equal-pain/">Writers strike over more money, searching for equal pain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-over-more-money-searching-for-equal-pain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1030497/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-over-more-money-searching-for-equal-pain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>strike</category><category>television</category><category>union</category><category>WGA</category><category>writers</category><category>Writers Guild of America</category><category>WritersGuildOfAmerica</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Writers strike, poop joke shortage feared]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-poop-joke-shortage-feared/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-poop-joke-shortage-feared/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-poop-joke-shortage-feared/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p>At midnight, the Writer's Guild of America <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/05/business/media/05strike.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">walked off the job</a>, leaving the television and entertainment industry without anyone to craft the jokes and dramatic dialog we depend on to fill our otherwise empty lives. No more poop deck gags for Fox's (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) <em>Family Guy</em> (you really phoned that one in, gang). No more four-times-an-hour plot reversals for <em>24</em>. No more lame-o quips to eviscerate the comedy of viewer-submitted video on <em>Animal Planet</em>.<br /><br />The discord is symptomatic of the evolution in the entertainment industry, as the various contributors fight for a fair share of the spoils of internet-based and DVD revenues. These new alternatives provide the long tail for entertainment, allowing once filed-and-forgotten shows to remain available for viewing ad nauseum. <br /><br />As online entertainment embraces the advertising-supported model, the archive of shows will continue to spin off revenue, and the writers want their share. Can you blame them? Sure, stars like <a href="http://www.tomgreen.com/">Tom Green</a> deserve millions for embarrassing themselves on television, but shouldn't there be a least a little sump'm sump'm for the people that create the words that drive the entertainment? <br /><br />Or perhaps the Blue Man Group is all you need or want.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-poop-joke-shortage-feared/">Writers strike, poop joke shortage feared</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/05/business/media/05strike.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-poop-joke-shortage-feared/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1030409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/05/writers-strike-poop-joke-shortage-feared/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>strike</category><category>television</category><category>union</category><category>WGA</category><category>writers</category><category>Writers Guild of America</category><category>WritersGuildOfAmerica</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler contract approved by UAW; Ford negotiations loom]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/chrysler-contract-approved-by-uaw-ford-negotiations-loom/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/chrysler-contract-approved-by-uaw-ford-negotiations-loom/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/chrysler-contract-approved-by-uaw-ford-negotiations-loom/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a></p>After some nervous moments in the last three weeks, representatives of the United Automobile Workers (UAW) union <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/business/28auto.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">agreed to a new four-year labor contract with Chrysler</a>, now owned by private capital group <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/cerberus-capital/">Cerberus Capital</a>. The deal guarantees future work to much of Chrysler's workforce and hopefully puts to rest the October 10th six-hour walkout that's still fresh on the UAW's mind.<br /><br />In reaching an agreement with Chrysler, the largest automotive union now can look forward to negotiating a deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>), as deals with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) and Chrysler are now complete and in the books. The agreed-upon contract with Chrysler finally gained support at the plants that mattered, including the four larger Detroit-area car factories. Although some of the voting plants, such as a plant in Belvidere, Illinois, still had issues with the contract, the majority votes were enough to give it ratification as of late this weekend.<br /><br />According to the UAW, roughly 56% of hourly workers and 51% of skilled trades workers approved the agreement as of this past Saturday evening. That's not a huge sweep of approval, but it was enough to put the negotiations to bed for the next four years. <br /><br />At least for the next four years, Chrysler's union employees will have some sense of security as the automaker struggles to return to consistent positive performance under the ownership of a private set of investors. With Ford up next -- and obviously feeling pressure to mold a new agreement in the vein of the recent GM and Chrysler contracts -- the UAW still has its greatest test ahead.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/chrysler-contract-approved-by-uaw-ford-negotiations-loom/">Chrysler contract approved by UAW; Ford negotiations loom</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/business/28auto.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/chrysler-contract-approved-by-uaw-ford-negotiations-loom/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1024221/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/29/chrysler-contract-approved-by-uaw-ford-negotiations-loom/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autoworkers</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>Chrysler contract</category><category>ChryslerContract</category><category>labor</category><category>UAW</category><category>UAW Chrysler</category><category>UAW contract</category><category>UAW negotiations</category><category>UawChrysler</category><category>UawContract</category><category>UawNegotiations</category><category>union</category><category>United Automobile Workers</category><category>UnitedAutomobileWorkers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford vulnerable heading into UAW negotiations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/ford-vulnerable-heading-into-uaw-negotiations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/ford-vulnerable-heading-into-uaw-negotiations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/ford-vulnerable-heading-into-uaw-negotiations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img alt="Ford (NYSE: F) logo" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/f-ford-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Now that the UAW contract with Chrysler is all but ratified, the big union <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119335775196272291.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">gets to sit down</a> with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>). In some ways, bargaining with America's second-largest car company may be the toughest negotiation of all. Ford is in worse shape than its peers, and its revenue problems get worse as each month passes.</p>
<p>Ford may be able to afford putting $30 billion into a health-care fund that the union would manage. That would improve the company's earnings in future quarters. But it would also deplete Ford's balance sheet and give it less cash to fund a turnaround of its U.S. operations. Selling off Jaguar or Rover could bring in more capital, but the process to dump the two brands is slow and the current credit environment will not help Ford get a good price.</p>
<p>Ford had hoped that new products would improve its prospects, but its car sales have dropped about 20% in its home market each of the last two months. It is not clear that Ford can ever make a profit if its U.S. sales do not recover from current levels. It needs sharp cuts in its labor costs in addition to a better sales picture.</p>
<p>The UAW can do a great deal of damage to Ford by insisting on modest job cuts. Ford can ill afford a strike now that the other two U.S. car makers have deals and Japanese rivals pick up market share most months. But the union's rank-and-file came close to rejecting the Chrysler contract because it guaranteed too little in terms of jobs and pay in the years ahead.</p>
<p>UAW workers are likely to take the position that it is not their job to keep Ford in business. And that attitude is the most likely one to put Ford's future in harm's way.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/ford-vulnerable-heading-into-uaw-negotiations/">Ford vulnerable heading into UAW negotiations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119335775196272291.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/ford-vulnerable-heading-into-uaw-negotiations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1022522/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/26/ford-vulnerable-heading-into-uaw-negotiations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>F</category><category>Ford Motors</category><category>FordMotors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jaguar</category><category>labor</category><category>Rover</category><category>UAW</category><category>union</category><category>United Auto Workers</category><category>UnitedAutoWorkers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Protectionism politics]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/protectionism-politics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/protectionism-politics/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/protectionism-politics/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>As CNBC hosted a presidential debate targeting the business audience, the issue of protectionism, or the economic policy of restraining trade between nations, was raised in a number of ways: Why do we have trade deficits? Why do both heads of a household need to work versus one? Why do people have to work so many more hours to live at the same standard of living as their parents? Why is the U.S. dollar weak? This is a debate that will only intensify as the Republicans and Democrats pick their candidates to face-off against each other.<br /><br />Utilizing protectionism as the political hot button for a presidential campaign always carries the risk of unintended consequences. A candidate could actually convince the American people that protectionism could work, as the merits of globalization can often be hard to communicate and are often only understood after having experienced the economic limitations of protected borders. <br /><br />The irony of CNBC's debate is that it was hosted in Michigan. This is the U.S. state which has stuck most closely to strong unionization and attempts to limit competition, and has also registered some of the weakest economic growth in the U.S. since the shift from a manufacturing to a service economy began some twenty-five years ago. <br /><br />Senator John McCain brought up the Smoot Hawley Tariff Act which led to the Great Depression and World War II during the debate. Closed borders equal closed minds which translates into some bad economic times. The temptation of protectionism is one that must be avoided.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/protectionism-politics/">Protectionism politics</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/protectionism-politics/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1009901/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/10/protectionism-politics/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>debate</category><category>depression</category><category>dollar</category><category>economic policy</category><category>EconomicPolicy</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>presidential debate</category><category>PresidentialDebate</category><category>protectionism</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler up next for UAW contract talks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/chrysler-up-next-for-uaw-contract-talks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/chrysler-up-next-for-uaw-contract-talks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/chrysler-up-next-for-uaw-contract-talks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/chrysler_logo.jpg" alt="Chrysler logo" />Now that the United Autoworker's Union (UAW) is finished with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) in terms of labor talks, next up to bat will be Chrysler LLC. The company is being acquired by <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/">private equity</a> firm <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/cerberus-capital/">Cerberus Capital,</a> but that's not stopping it from making vehicles and trying to dent into the domestic market share being rapidly enjoyed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>).<br /><br />This past Sunday, the two parties <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUKN0726798320071007">began negotiating terms of a new labor agreement</a> after nearly three weeks of stalling due to UAW's extension of Chrysler's existing contract so that the GM deal could be put to rest, which it was. UAW President Ron Gettelfinger now has his sights set on Chrysler and hopes that new ground can be broken with the Detroit automaker now that it has a new owner in a private investment firm (new blood, heh) along with the problem of slowing and stagnating sales -- a problem Chrysler has in common with GM and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys"> F</a>).<br /><br />The broken-record syndrome currently facing all three domestic automakers is causing production plant idling and increased incentives to move out overloaded inventory just at a time when competitors like Toyota and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys?from=lookup">Honda Motor Co. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/honda-motor-co-adr/hmc/nys?from=lookup">HMC</a>) are increasing market share and are putting out highly competitive passenger vehicle models. Will Cerberus break new ground with its UAW labor talks that are significantly different from former parent Daimler (which still owns a 20% stake)? I'm thinking yes, or the company would not have bought the Chrysler brand for $7.4 billion in the first place.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/chrysler-up-next-for-uaw-contract-talks/">Chrysler up next for UAW contract talks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUKN0726798320071007>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/chrysler-up-next-for-uaw-contract-talks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1008782/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/chrysler-up-next-for-uaw-contract-talks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Autoworkers</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>contract</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>talks</category><category>UAW</category><category>Union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford (F) and Chrysler may not follow UAW-GM deal template after all]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/ford-f-and-chrysler-may-not-follow-uaw-gm-deal-template-after/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/ford-f-and-chrysler-may-not-follow-uaw-gm-deal-template-after/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/ford-f-and-chrysler-may-not-follow-uaw-gm-deal-template-after/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a></p>After the recent deal between the United Auto Workers Union and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">Ford Motor Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ford-motor-company/f/nys">F</a>) and Chrysler were lining up to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/28/ford-f-will-seek-deeper-cuts-than-general-motors-gm-when-uaw/">make a similar deal</a> with the nation's largest automotive labor union. (This is something I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/28/ford-f-will-seek-deeper-cuts-than-general-motors-gm-when-uaw/">hinted at a week ago</a>.) But now both automakers are saying they are no longer going to be able and use the GM-UAW agreement as a template for negotiations.<br /><br />This makes sense, as Ford is in much deeper trouble financially than GM is and a union representing Chrysler workers expressed reluctance to sign a deal with the UAW that would have basically mirrored the GM deal, according to <span style="font-style: italic;">The Wall Street Journal</span> this week.<br /><br />As I stated earlier, Ford's financial problems will require a completely different set of eyeballs on both sides of the table if the company is to make a profit sometime in the next five years. Ford CEO Alan Mulally has promised a return to profitability by 2009.<br /><br />At the heart of the issue is GM's agreement with the UAW over the timing and production plans of new U.S. vehicle plants. With both Ford and Chrysler in flux right now in very different ways, we'll probably see extended contract talks and more teeth-gnashing when <a href="http://www.uaw.org/about/officers/gettelfinger.html">Ron Gettelfinger and the UAW</a> come to town soon.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/ford-f-and-chrysler-may-not-follow-uaw-gm-deal-template-after/">Ford (F) and Chrysler may not follow UAW-GM deal template after all</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2007/10/02/news/companies/uaw_chrysler_ford/?postversion=2007100208>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/ford-f-and-chrysler-may-not-follow-uaw-gm-deal-template-after/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1005164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/04/ford-f-and-chrysler-may-not-follow-uaw-gm-deal-template-after/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chrysler</category><category>deals</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>labor</category><category>template</category><category>UAW</category><category>union</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:57:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
