<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation's 'Megamind' Retains Top Spot]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dwa/" rel="tag">DreamWorks Animation (DWA)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Megamind"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/11/megamind-logo.jpg" />DreamWorks Animation's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) <em>Megamind</em> movie didn't have such a great debut last weekend, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/08/market-down-on-dreamworks-animation-after-megamind-debut/">in my opinion</a>. This weekend, however, I have to give it at least some credit: It once again captured the top spot at domestic theaters. <a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Box Office Mojo</a> says that the project made $29 million from Friday through Sunday, bringing the total gross so far to nearly $89 million. </p>
<p>Don't expect me to jump up and down for joy, though -- and I highly doubt shareholders of the studio are happy that the film didn't at least crack the $100 million mark by this point.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation's 'Megamind' Retains Top Spot</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/">DreamWorks Animation's 'Megamind' Retains Top Spot</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19719177/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/16/dreamworks-animations-megamind-retains-top-spot/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>Dreamworks Animation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Megamind</category><category>Skyline</category><category>universal pictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Iron Man 2: A Hero Again for Disney]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/17/iron-man-2-is-a-hero-again-to-disney/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/17/iron-man-2-is-a-hero-again-to-disney/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/17/iron-man-2-is-a-hero-again-to-disney/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dwa/" rel="tag">DreamWorks Animation (DWA)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/05/1ironman-1274094371.jpg" alt="Iron Man 2 top movie for second weekend " />Disney's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) <em>Iron Man 2</em> did it again. According to early estimates from the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/iron-man-2-stays-atop-box-office-with/599796/">Associated Press</a> (which could change once final numbers are issued, like they did <a href="http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/05/10/box-office-actuals-iron-man-2-grosses-5-million-less-than-originally-reported/">last time around</a>), the superhero flick, which is distributed by Viacom (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), captured $53 million over the weekend at domestic theaters, making it the top feature once again. <br />
<br />
The new <em>Robin Hood</em> picture, starring Russell Crowe and brought to multiplexes by General Electric's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures, came in second with what I thought was a weak $37 million.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/17/iron-man-2-is-a-hero-again-to-disney/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Iron Man 2: A Hero Again for Disney</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/17/iron-man-2-is-a-hero-again-to-disney/">Iron Man 2: A Hero Again for Disney</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 May 2010 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/iron-man-2-stays-atop-box-office-with/599796/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/17/iron-man-2-is-a-hero-again-to-disney/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19479097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/17/iron-man-2-is-a-hero-again-to-disney/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Dreamworks Animation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>How to Train Your Dragon</category><category>inthenews</category><category>iron man 2</category><category>just wright</category><category>Letters to Juliet</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Robin Hood</category><category>Summit Entertainment</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dwayne Johnson and Disney conjure up a hit with 'Race to Witch Mountain']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walt-disney-company-dis-logo.jpg" />Well, it looks like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) redeemed itself after the awful <em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/the-jonas-brothers-fail-at-the-box-office-will-they-survive/">Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert</a></em> disappointment. </p>
<p>According to early estimates at <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>, the Mouse's new movie, <em>Race to Witch Mountain</em>, was the number-one flick at domestic theaters this past weekend. The remake of the classic Disney film <em>Escape to Witch Mountain</em> took in roughly $25 million. </p>
<p>That was more than enough to send <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Watchmen</em> to second place. The superhero project made around $18 million. Coming in third was another remake, although this is no family movie, I can tell you that. Distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures, <em>The Last House on the Left</em>, a grim horror film full of terror and torture, took in $14 million. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dwayne Johnson and Disney conjure up a hit with 'Race to Witch Mountain'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/">Dwayne Johnson and Disney conjure up a hit with 'Race to Witch Mountain'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1488808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dwayne johnson</category><category>DwayneJohnson</category><category>escape to witch mountain</category><category>EscapeToWitchMountain</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jonas brothers</category><category>jonas brothers the 3d concert experience</category><category>JonasBrothers</category><category>JonasBrothersThe3dConcertExperience</category><category>last house on the left</category><category>LastHouseOnTheLeft</category><category>race to witch mountain</category><category>RaceToWitchMountain</category><category>The Rock</category><category>TheRock</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE's Universal says no to Spielberg; Disney may say yes? Really?!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/spielberg_gov_photo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />I'll tell you, I find this such amazingly telling news. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures apparently does not want to distribute a DreamWorks slate anymore. </p>
<p>According to <em><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3if08da6d1db7f9cb4ab17c7dde089c999">The Hollywood Reporter</a></em>, changes that DreamWorks wanted to make to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/13/ge-and-steven-spielberg-a-dream-come-true/">previous deal</a> that was already hammered out did not pass muster with Universal execs. In a statement, Universal commented that such changes no longer fit the movie studio's business plan. You'll recall that Steven Spielberg and his DreamWorks company left the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) fold recently in pursuit of fresh funding and a new distribution partner to start life anew.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GE's Universal says no to Spielberg; Disney may say yes? Really?!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/">GE's Universal says no to Spielberg; Disney may say yes? Really?!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1452867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/07/ges-universal-says-no-to-spielberg-disney-may-say-yes-really/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bob iger</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dreamworks</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>HBO</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>steven spielberg</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Universal Pictures had a great year -- does it matter?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/nbculogo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Recently, Zac Bissonnette took <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) and its press-release wizards to task for essentially issuing a document that was full of spin but low on substance. This was in regard to Amazon having its "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/amazon-spin-machine-declares-it-the-best-christmas-ever/">best Christmas ever</a>." I'm sure you've heard about it. Well, I was looking at an article yesterday that talked about some box-office numbers from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures asset. I kind of got the same feeling about the numbers as Zac did about the Amazon Christmas thing. </p>
<p>Of course, keep in mind, the <a href="http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=814047">article</a> I was looking at was not a press release. Still, the execs at NBC Universal are surely pretty proud about the numbers. After all, they are supposed to be best-ever stats. On the domestic side of things, Universal achieved a total box-office gross of approximately $1.1 billion. </p>
<p>On the international front, the studio brought in $1.7 billion. The year-over-year growth rate was flat for domestic theaters, and for international theaters, the company saw a robust 66% increase. Personally, I'm not impressed. To begin with, domestic was flat, and that's not good. And as for international, well, there was no context in terms of the effects of currency rates. </p>
<p>Plus, does it really matter if a studio is achieving high grosses? There's never any comment about profits and losses on specific titles, compensation structures for the stars, etc. To me, this data doesn't say a lot (admittedly, I'll never be satisfied with the amount of disclosure that studios are required to give on their movie projects). </p>
<p>The article mentions two films as drivers for the year that, in my opinion, underperformed in the domestic marketplace: <em><a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=incrediblehulk.htm">The Incredible Hulk</a></em>, based on the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) character, and the latest sequel in the <em><a href="http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=mummy3.htm">Mummy</a></em> franchise. The latter barely made it over the $100 million mark, and the former only grossed a little better than $130 million. Big deal. You would have figured that Universal could have squeezed some more box-office bucks out of these properties.</p>
<p>Many on Wall Street believe that GE should rid itself of NBC Universal. I'm not one of them, but I concede that Universal Pictures needs to do better. Seriously, Universal Pictures did okay, but not great, in '08. I sincerely hope that CEO Jeffrey Immelt does not allow the studio to rest on these laurels. That would be a shame, and a slap in the face to shareholders. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own GE; positions can change without notice.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/">Universal Pictures had a great year -- does it matter?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/28/amazon-spin-machine-declares-it-the-best-christmas-ever/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.rttnews.com/ArticleView.aspx?Id=814047>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=mummy3.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=incrediblehulk.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1416635/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/universal-pictures-had-a-great-year-does-it-matter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jeffrey Immelt</category><category>JeffreyImmelt</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>NBC Universal</category><category>NbcUniversal</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>The Mummy</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>TheMummy</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>Zac Bissonnette</category><category>ZacBissonnette</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will there be any more 'Hulk' movies?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/hulk.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) is all about making movie franchises these days. For instance, the success of <em>Iron Man </em>has led to plans for a sequel. Shareholders are, understandably, happy about this since a series of blockbuster films will rake in a lot of money for the company and have a positive effect on the shares.</p>
<p>But, Marvel's second movie out of the gate, <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>, may not get the sequel treatment, according to the <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-07-09T051128Z_01_N09318115_RTRIDST_0_FILM-HULK.XML"><em>Hollywood Reporter</em></a>. The article implied that the financial performance of the film may not have been blockbuster enough to make a sequel inevitable. That doesn't mean that it won't eventually get one, but since there are, as of now, no plans for another <em>Hulk</em>, the speculation is out there. As aforementioned, we already know that there will be another <em>Iron Man</em>. </p>
<p>As a Marvel shareholder, I am disappointed by the box-office results for this latest iteration of the<em> Hulk </em>(even the first weekend <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/">seemed weak</a>). Back in 2003, when that year's movie version of the character was released, there was widespread disdain for the project (I myself couldn't stand the flick). Then came this summer's so-called reboot of the franchise. Unfortunately, as of now, 2008 <em>Hulk </em>hasn't done much better than 2003 <em>Hulk</em>. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will there be any more 'Hulk' movies?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/">Will there be any more 'Hulk' movies?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-07-09T051128Z_01_N09318115_RTRIDST_0_FILM-HULK.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1250955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/will-there-be-any-more-hulk-movies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[I'm nervous about the new 'Hulk' movie]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" alt="" />I have a confession to make: I'm getting nervous as the weekend approaches. A certain movie has me rather frightened. Is it that creepy picture about mass suicides from M. Night Shyamalan? Nope. It's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) <em>The Incredible Hulk</em>. I'm a shareholder of Marvel, and I'm worried about its prospects. It opens on Friday the 13th. Yeah, that's a lucky omen.</p>
<p><em>Hulk</em>, which is being distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal (I own GE as well, but this won't move GE at all), represents a fresh start for the green, angry beast. If you'll recall, there was a Hulk movie back in summer 2003. It was horrible. In fact, I remember getting up and walking around the theater during a portion of the film so that I could do a bit of self-editing on it. This time around could be different. I just read a review from<em> The Hollywood Reporter</em> that was featured in this <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-06-12T010205Z_01_N11380984_RTRIDST_0_REVIEW-FILM-HULK.XML">Reuters</a> link, and I have to say, I do feel a little calmer. According to the review, this new take on the Hulk character is an entertaining cinematic diversion wholly suitable for the dog days of summer. It apparently is a superior product.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>I'm nervous about the new 'Hulk' movie</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/">I'm nervous about the new 'Hulk' movie</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2008-06-12T010205Z_01_N11380984_RTRIDST_0_REVIEW-FILM-HULK.XML>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1223136/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/12/im-nervous-about-the-new-hulk-movie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>marvel</category><category>marvel movies</category><category>MarvelMovies</category><category>MVL</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner scores at the box office with 'Sex' pic]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/sex-and-the-city.jpg" alt="" />The box-office estimates from <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a> for this past weekend surprised the heck out of me. Apparently, I'm out of touch with how popular this HBO show actually was because <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Sex and the City </em>captured first place at domestic multiplexes, hauling in over $55 million as of now (the numbers will change when they are finalized later on). Honestly, I thought I was going to be writing about the failure of Carrie and the gang. Kudos to Time Warner for opening this picture to great success. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull </em>continues to bring in the nostalgia crowd as well as generate new fans for the franchise. It came in second place with about $46 million for the weekend. Still, I'm amazed that "Sex and the City" topped it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time Warner scores at the box office with 'Sex' pic</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/">Time Warner scores at the box office with 'Sex' pic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1211640/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/02/time-warner-scores-at-the-box-office-with-sex-pic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>indiana jones and th...</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTh...</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>MVL</category><category>NWS</category><category>Prince Caspian</category><category>PrinceCaspian</category><category>Sex and the city</category><category>The Strangers</category><category>TheStrangers</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hasbro sends the Ouija board to the silver screen]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/hasbro-sends-the-ouija-board-to-the-silver-screen/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/hasbro-sends-the-ouija-board-to-the-silver-screen/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/hasbro-sends-the-ouija-board-to-the-silver-screen/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/has/" rel="tag">Hasbro Inc (HAS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p>Remember that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/20/hasbro-continues-to-go-hollywood/">movie deal</a> that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc-united-states/has/nys">Hasbro</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc-united-states/has/nys">HAS</a>) signed not long ago with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures for the express purpose of bringing some of its board game brands to the big screen? Well, I'm happy to report that the first one appears to be in development. And it's the one I was rooting for!</p>
<p>According to the <em>Hollywood Reporter</em>, the <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i3f3a21456cba6a51378e1ce061a0ab60">Ouija board is getting the big-screen treatment</a>. Sure, Ouija boards have been featured in films before; heck, my friends and I used a Ouija board in a short film we made years ago. But, this time, Hasbro is hooking up with Michael Bay and his Platinum Dunes production company to give the concept a proper cinematic adaptation, one specifically geared, I have no doubt, to increase the value of Hasbro's brand equity and to, like this needs to be even stated, sell more Ouija boards! </p>
<p>Michael Bay is a pretty competent producer/director. He was responsible for <em>Transformers</em>, as I'm sure you'll recall, and he's been hard at work the last few years on remakes of famous horror films. He's already been involved with remakes of <em>The Amityville Horror </em>and <em>The Texas Chainsaw Massacre</em>, and he is working on new takes of <em>A Nightmare on Elm Street </em>and <em>Friday the Thirteenth</em>. He'd better get the latter right, since it's one of my favorite films!</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/hasbro-sends-the-ouija-board-to-the-silver-screen/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hasbro sends the Ouija board to the silver screen</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/hasbro-sends-the-ouija-board-to-the-silver-screen/">Hasbro sends the Ouija board to the silver screen</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 May 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/hasbro-sends-the-ouija-board-to-the-silver-screen/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1211153/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/31/hasbro-sends-the-ouija-board-to-the-silver-screen/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Board games</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>HAS</category><category>Hasbro</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MAT</category><category>Mattel</category><category>Michael Bay</category><category>Ouija</category><category>Platinum Dunes</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should film studios always spread the risk?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/hollywood-sign.jpg" alt="" />General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures asset received some good news the other day -- 75% of the studio's movie projects for the next few years will be funded, in part, by a financing entity known as Relativity Capital. According to <em><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i4e4b94c11d15b8f2e61b0aa6eb4af83c">The Hollywood Reporter</a></em>, the deal calls for Relativity to help cover production costs, but not marketing programs; it could see about $500 million spread out over as many as 45 movies. Also, this is being described as a bona fide partnership -- not only will Relativity share in profits generated by ancillary channels, such as home video and television sales, but it will also have the power to co-greenlight a project, and it will be able to review the talent and budget attached to each project. </p>
<p>Financing by hedge funds and private equity is certainly not new in Hollywood; it's been around for a long time. So has the practice of selling off international rights and partnerships between studio competitors. Remember James Cameron's <em>Titanic</em>? It took the studio segments of both <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">VIA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) to shoulder that costly celluloid endeavor. But, although I recognize that filmmaking is extremely risky, and that a flop is very much in the cards whether or not big stars are in a film, I also have to wonder if it might be better for studios to simply lessen their risk by making much cheaper movies and foregoing the distribution of risk. What's my beef with distribution of risk? Well, I'm not the first to say this, and it's pretty obvious at any rate: hedge your bet, and you also limit your upside score in terms of a windfall. </p>
<br />
<p><em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should film studios always spread the risk?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/">Should film studios always spread the risk?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1127735/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/should-film-studios-always-spread-the-risk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>co-financing movie deals</category><category>Co-financingMovieDeals</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>James Cameron</category><category>JamesCameron</category><category>Relativity Capital</category><category>RelativityCapital</category><category>Titanic</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hasbro continues to go Hollywood]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/20/hasbro-continues-to-go-hollywood/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/20/hasbro-continues-to-go-hollywood/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/20/hasbro-continues-to-go-hollywood/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/has/" rel="tag">Hasbro Inc (HAS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/monopoly-man.gif"  alt="" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Hasbro</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">HAS</a>) is becoming quite the Hollywood power. Sure, the company helped launch a new sci-fi/fantasy franchise last year with <em>Transformers</em>, but that doesn't mean it wants to sit back and relax by the pool just yet. Instead, Hasbro is taking meetings and getting deals done.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GE</a>) Universal Pictures has entered into a <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-23152957.htm">six-year deal</a> with Hasbro to produce four feature films using some of the toy maker's various intellectual properties. Included in the mix are the major boardgames we all know and love -- Candy Land, Clue, Battleship, and, of course, perhaps most famous of them all, Monopoly. The first project should be out around 2010. </p>
<p>I'm not sure about Candy Land, but a movie based on Monopoly would be pretty cool. I have no idea what Universal Pictures has in mind for these properties -- I mean, will the boardgames come to life and intrude upon the real world, or will the stories be set literally inside the boardgames themselves? -- but I think this deal has real potential. A few more big hits like <em>Transformers</em> will do wonders for Hasbro and its brand equity. And I do believe these movies could be big hits, especially if the right stars are attached (imagine Jim Carrey and Donald Trump in a Monopoly movie, for example).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/20/hasbro-continues-to-go-hollywood/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hasbro continues to go Hollywood</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/20/hasbro-continues-to-go-hollywood/">Hasbro continues to go Hollywood</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-23152957.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/20/hasbro-continues-to-go-hollywood/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1119907/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/20/hasbro-continues-to-go-hollywood/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battleship</category><category>Candy Land</category><category>CandyLand</category><category>GE</category><category>HAS</category><category>Hasbro</category><category>MAT</category><category>Mattel</category><category>Ouija board</category><category>OuijaBoard</category><category>Transformers</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:49:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Evan Almighty's arc just sank]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/"><img align="right" style="width: 183px; height: 123px;" alt="" src="http://www.tublogdecine.es/wp-content/themes/Cinestar2/img/almighty.bmp" />I recently blogged</a> about my concerns if <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan Almighty</span> flopped this weekend.<br /><br />I, as well as many others, would classify the $32.1 million opening weekend of <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan as </span>a flop. <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118270646516746291.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Peter Sanders of the WSJ </a>believes that <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan Almighty</span> was the first "major pothole" in Hollywood's sequel-filled summer. He also put <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan </span>in the same category as <span style="font-style: italic;">Spider-Man 3, Shrek the Third and Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End</span>, by saying May's blockbuster "threequels" were all expected to fall short of their previous domestic sales numbers. <br /><br />Could that be true? <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118270646516746291.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Looking at the numbers,</a> Sanders has a good argument. That's only if you thought sequels should outperform the original. Other than <span style="font-style: italic;">Shrek II,</span> most of the recent sequels made less than its predecessors. Even the Harry Potter franchise couldn't make a sequel that outperformed the $317.5 million earned from <span style="font-style: italic;">Sorcerer's Stone</span>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Evan Almighty's arc just sank</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/">Evan Almighty's arc just sank</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/926349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bourne</category><category>bruce almighty</category><category>BruceAlmighty</category><category>carell</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>evan almighty</category><category>EvanAlmighty</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>hollywood</category><category>hot rod</category><category>HotRod</category><category>lasseter</category><category>mummy</category><category>narnia</category><category>paramount</category><category>pirates</category><category>pixar</category><category>sequel</category><category>shadyac</category><category>shrek</category><category>sisterhood</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>sorcerer's stone</category><category>Sorcerer'sStone</category><category>spider man</category><category>SpiderMan</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>superbad</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>VIA</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What happens if Universal Pictures' Evan Almighty flops?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413099/"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/aol-fly-logo.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Evan Almighty</a></em>, sequel to the 2003 hit <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0315327/"><em>Bruce Almighty</em></a>, is opening this weekend to some <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/reviews/2007-06-21-evan-almighty_N.htm">bad reviews</a>. The estimated $175 million price-tag, which earned itself the title "<a href="http://defamer.com/hollywood/universal/evan-almighty-the-most-expensive-comedy-story-ever-told-206378.php">the most expensive comedy story ever told</a>," had to raise some eyebrows from the beginning.</p>
<p>Still, Universal executives Marc Shmuger and David Linde think they're going to rake in the dough with the <em>Almighty </em>sequel. "This movie is a great bet," Universal Chairman Marc Shmuger told the<em> LA Times</em> last year. "It's a spectacle fantasy and also a comedy. And a sequel to one of the most successful hits in the studio's history."</p>
<p>If <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001723/">Tom Shadyac's</a> <em>Evan Almighty</em> turns into a hit, as Shumger and Universal hopes, the movie could put big-budget comedies on the front burner. If it flops, don't expect to see another big comedy for a while. Remember how Kevin Costner's <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114898/">Waterworld </a></em>flopped in 1995? Costner's budget was also estimated at $175 million (back then), however, the U.S. box office only raked in $88 million. We didn't see too many high budget sci-fi flicks for a while after that one.</p>
<p>Who does this hurt? Well, it hurts <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) for one, parent company of Universal Pictures. Outside of the possibility of it hurting <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0136797/">Steve Carell</a>'s career, it hurts you, the viewer. If <em>Evan</em> flops, don't expect to laugh while munching on your popcorn at the movies anytime soon.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/">What happens if Universal Pictures' Evan Almighty flops?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/924432/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>big-budget comedies</category><category>bruce almighty</category><category>BruceAlmighty</category><category>carell</category><category>comedy</category><category>David Linde</category><category>evan almighty</category><category>EvanAlmighty</category><category>film</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Kevin Kostner</category><category>linde</category><category>Marc Shmuger</category><category>movie</category><category>premiere</category><category>shadyac</category><category>shmuger</category><category>Steve Carell</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>Tom Shadyac</category><category>universal</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>waterworld</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Spiderman 3', everything '3': Preview of potential summer blockbusters]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/spiderman_3_kissing.jpg" align="middle" vspace="4" border="0" /><br />Last year I previewed the <a href="http://theflyonthewallblog.blogspot.com/2006/05/through-theflys-eyes-film-studios-from.html">big-budget summer movies</a>, giving you a look at ten interesting films that were on the docket for the summer of 2006. This year I'm back with an even longer list (bloated like these films' budgets) of 15 movies you may want to escape to -- or possibly run screaming from.<br /><br />Of these fifteen movies, <em>Spiderman 3</em> and ten others are sequels, which in itself indicates something about the state of the industry (And I didn't even include <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Rush Hour 3</span> in this list, because, honestly, who wants to see that?). Two of the remaining four movies, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Transformers </span>and <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Simpsons</span>, are based on animated television shows, leaving only two original ideas in the whole lot -- <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Knocked Up </span>and <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Ratatouille</span>. Please, don't shoot the messenger.<br /><br />Anyway, here is the list, chronologically, of the movies that Hollywood's brain-trust believes you will shell out your cash to see in the air-conditioned darkness of your local movie-house, along with my opinion of how they'll fare. The first on the list, <em>Spider-Man 3</em>, is already out in Asia, but will not be released here until May. All release dates below are for the U.S.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">5/04 - <em>Spider-Man 3</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corp's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) Sony Pictures</span><br />Being the first blockbuster of the summer almost guarantees a successful open, and the popularity of the franchise seals that guarantee. One problem, however, is that "success" measured by any normal means won't be enough, as this movie had an estimated budget of $258M.<br /><br style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold" /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">5/11 - <em>28 Weeks Later</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) 20th Century Fox</span><br />The highlight of the horror/zombie genre for the summer, this follows the surprise success of Danny Boyle's <em>28 Days Later,</em> which reinvented the zombie film with faster zombies and smarter characters.<br /><br style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold" /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">5/18 - <em>Shrek the Third</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-a-new/via/nys">Viacom's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-a-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) Paramount Pictures</span><br />One of the only cartoon franchises that has held its own against Pixar (<em>Ice Age</em> being the other), the draw of this fairytale romp is that while kids love the story, there are enough winks at the adult audience to make parents happy to take them.<br /><br /><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">5/25 - <em>Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End</em>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>)</span><br />Money in the bank for Disney, and since it was shot simultaneous with the second <em>Pirates</em> installment, it wasn't even as expensive to make as this summer's other budget hog, <em>Spider-Man 3</em>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Spiderman 3', everything '3': Preview of potential summer blockbusters</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/">'Spiderman 3', everything '3': Preview of potential summer blockbusters</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/885553/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/30/spiderman-3-everything-3-preview-of-potential-summer-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>28 weeks later</category><category>28WeeksLater</category><category>at world's end</category><category>AtWorld'sEnd</category><category>blockbuster</category><category>blockbusters</category><category>bourne</category><category>bourne ultimatum</category><category>BourneUltimatum</category><category>cinema</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>fastastic four</category><category>FastasticFour</category><category>film</category><category>ge</category><category>harry potter</category><category>harry potter and the order of the phoenix</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>HarryPotterAndTheOrderOfThePhoenix</category><category>hostel</category><category>hostel part iii</category><category>hostel part three</category><category>HostelPartIii</category><category>HostelPartThree</category><category>knocked up</category><category>KnockedUp</category><category>movie</category><category>movies</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>ocean's thirteen</category><category>Ocean'sThirteen</category><category>order of the phoenix</category><category>OrderOfThePhoenix</category><category>paramount</category><category>paramount pictures</category><category>ParamountPictures</category><category>part iii</category><category>PartIii</category><category>pirates of the caribbean</category><category>PiratesOfTheCaribbean</category><category>rise of the silver surfer</category><category>RiseOfTheSilverSurfer</category><category>shrek</category><category>shrek the third</category><category>ShrekTheThird</category><category>simpsons</category><category>simpsons movie</category><category>SimpsonsMovie</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>spiderman 3</category><category>Spiderman3</category><category>summer</category><category>summer blockbuster</category><category>SummerBlockbuster</category><category>the simpsons</category><category>TheSimpsons</category><category>transformers</category><category>twx</category><category>ultimatum</category><category>universal</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>warner brothers</category><category>WarnerBrothers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Mission III's weak open create opportunity for GE's Universal Pictures?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/08/does-mission-iiis-weak-open-create-opportunity-for-ges-univers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/08/does-mission-iiis-weak-open-create-opportunity-for-ges-univers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/08/does-mission-iiis-weak-open-create-opportunity-for-ges-univers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a></p><p><em>Mission Impossible III</em> did not have the blockbuster weekend that many expected.&nbsp;I didn't see it, but reviews&nbsp;weren't stellar. The <em><a href="http://movies2.nytimes.com/2006/05/05/movies/05impo.html">New York Times</a></em> was lukewarm at best and the&nbsp;<em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114678304896244245.html?mod=at_leisure_main_editors_picks_days_only">Wall Street Journal</a></em> was positive, if not all that impressed. It <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-05-07T202500Z_01_N07408916_RTRIDST_0_LEISURE-BOXOFFICE-UPDATE-2.XML">took in $48 million</a>,&nbsp;when expectations were for&nbsp;an&nbsp;opening weekend of $60 million.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The important takeaway for GE investors is that Tom's box office bruising could open the door a little wider for&nbsp;GE's <a href="http://www.universalpictures.com/">Universal Pictures</a>&nbsp;to come up with an unexpected hit&nbsp;this summer. According to <a href="http://www.movieweb.com/news/99/12299.php">MovieWeb</a>, Universal's action picture line-up includes <em>Miami Vice</em>, with Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx. Maybe back-to-the-70s will score big? <em>The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift</em> starring Bow Wow, Lucas Black, Brian Tee and Nikki Griffin debuts June 16 and&nbsp;ranks 9th on MovieWeb's list of&nbsp; "most requested upcoming films." Maybe it will be the summer's winner? </p>
<p>My guess is that&nbsp;Universal's comedies with appealing all-star casts will be its big winners. June 2 brings <em>The Break-Up</em>, with Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn. July 14, <em>You, Me and Dupree,</em> starring Owen Wilson, Kate Hudson, Matt Dillon and Michael Douglas debuts. </p>
<p>Good news for Universal: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2006/05/07/box-office-report-insert-mission-impossible-joke-here/">RV was No. 2 last weekend and United 93, No. 5.</a> The latter seems to have some staying power.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/08/does-mission-iiis-weak-open-create-opportunity-for-ges-univers/">Does Mission III's weak open create opportunity for GE's Universal Pictures?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 May 2006 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.movieweb.com/news/99/12299.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/08/does-mission-iiis-weak-open-create-opportunity-for-ges-univers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/615003/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/08/does-mission-iiis-weak-open-create-opportunity-for-ges-univers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>The Fast and theFurious</category><category>TheFastAndThefurious</category><category>Universal Pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>You, Me and Dupree</category><category>You,MeAndDupree</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
