<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[John Bogle Lashes Out at Institutional Investors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/john-bogle-lashes-out-at-institutional-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/john-bogle-lashes-out-at-institutional-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/john-bogle-lashes-out-at-institutional-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/vanguard-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />Vanguard Group founder John Bogle may be 80 years old, but the crusader for individual investors is still going strong, continuing to lash out at the lazy, incompetent, and conflicted institutional money managers who have failed in their fiduciary responsibilities to their investors.<br /><br />In a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703436504574640523013840290.html#mod=todays_us_opinion">brilliant op-ed piece</a> in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, Bogle writes that "... far too many of our corporate and financial agents have failed to honor the interests of their principals -- the mutual fund investors and pension beneficiaries to whom they owed a fiduciary duty. The ramifications were widespread -- for the failure of money managers to observe the principles of fiduciary duty played a major role in allowing our corporate managers to place their own interests ahead of the interests of their shareholders."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/john-bogle-lashes-out-at-institutional-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>John Bogle Lashes Out at Institutional Investors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/john-bogle-lashes-out-at-institutional-investors/">John Bogle Lashes Out at Institutional Investors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/john-bogle-lashes-out-at-institutional-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19322249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/john-bogle-lashes-out-at-institutional-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Individual investors</category><category>institutional investors</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Bogle</category><category>Vanguard Group</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Financial Felons: Where are they now and is there a next generation coming? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/financial-felons-ivan-boesky.jpg" />We recently presented a look at some of the most <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/famous-financial-felons">notorious financial felons</a> of contemporary times.</p>
<p>Since then, news has included the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jj7fAsa1HVVJPue2eEgtWlTqkONQD94HNG3O0">indictment of Mark Cuban</a> for insider trading in a case that is somewhat reminiscent of Martha Stewart's case. According to the SEC, the billionaire entrepreneur asked his broker to sell all his shares of Mamma.com after the company's CEO confidentially told him of an impending stock offering that would dilute the value of all existing shares. By selling before the information became public, Cuban is said to have sidestepped losses of more than $750,000. Cuban insists, though, that no agreement existed to keep the information confidential.</p>
<p>And then there was the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h9PvQtj8plxTnRZS7hHmJap_Rt2AD94ICFU00">indictment in Texas of Vice President Dick Cheney</a>, along with former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and others. There seems to be a conflict of interest between the  vice president's influence on the federal agency that oversees federal immigration detention centers and his substantial holdings in Vanguard Group, which invests in private prison companies. But does the lame-duck county district attorney, who was a no-show in court, have the authority to bring charges against federal officials with regard to federally run institutions?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Financial Felons: Where are they now and is there a next generation coming? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/">Financial Felons: Where are they now and is there a next generation coming? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1381784/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/25/financial-felons-where-are-they-now-and-is-there-a-next-generat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adelphia</category><category>ADM</category><category>Alberto Gonzales</category><category>Andrew Fastow</category><category>Barry Minkow</category><category>Bernard Ebbers</category><category>Boris Berezovsky</category><category>Charles Keating</category><category>Dennis Kozlowski</category><category>Dick Cheney</category><category>Enron</category><category>financial felons</category><category>George Soros</category><category>insider trading</category><category>Ivan Boesky</category><category>Jack Abramoff</category><category>Jeff Skilling</category><category>John Rigas</category><category>Joseph Nacchio</category><category>Ken Lay</category><category>Lou Pearlman</category><category>Mamma.com</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Mark Whitacre</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Michael Milken</category><category>Nick Leeson</category><category>Qwest</category><category>Ted Stevens</category><category>Tyco</category><category>Vanguard Group</category><category>Worldcom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The rich don't like mutual funds, but Vanguard is a standout]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/the-rich-dont-like-mutual-funds-but-vanguard-is-a-standout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/the-rich-dont-like-mutual-funds-but-vanguard-is-a-standout/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/the-rich-dont-like-mutual-funds-but-vanguard-is-a-standout/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>While Robert Kiyosaki (of <em>Rich Dad, Poor Dad </em>fame) has railed against mutual funds for years (while simultaneously suggesting multilevel marketing schemes), it appears that he may have been right: rich people really don't seem to like mutual funds. According to a study <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117391803928937582.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">discussed </a>in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> (registration required) few wealthy investors are satisfied with the performance of their mutual funds. With good reason: over the long-term, passively managed index funds outperform most mutual funds.</p>
<p>One of the few fund companies that earned high marks from high net-worth investors is Vanguard Group, which was among the first companies to offer mutual funds. Vanguard still offers some of the lowest cost index funds around and, if you only choose one fund company for your retirement planning, Vanguard may be the way to go. Congratulations Vanguard, and keep up the good work.</p>
<p>On a side note, Vanguard founder John Bogle has written some amazing books about business and investing: <u><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Common-Sense-Mutual-Funds-Imperatives/dp/0471392286/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2/105-3925804-4090061?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1173942314&amp;sr=1-2"><em>Common Sense on Mutual Funds</em></a></u> and <u><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Battle-Soul-Capitalism-John-Bogle/dp/0300109903/ref=sr_1_7/105-3925804-4090061?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1173942314&amp;sr=1-7"><em>The Battle for the Soul of Capitalism</em></a></u> belong on the bookshelf of every serious investor. If <em>Common Sense</em> seems too intimidating, pick up his new <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Little-Book-Common-Sense-Investing/dp/0470102101/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-3925804-4090061?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1173942314&amp;sr=1-1"><em>Little Book of Common-Sense Investing</em></a> instead. While it really is a little book, it has everything you need to know to beat the vast majority of professional money managers.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/the-rich-dont-like-mutual-funds-but-vanguard-is-a-standout/">The rich don't like mutual funds, but Vanguard is a standout</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/the-rich-dont-like-mutual-funds-but-vanguard-is-a-standout/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/853077/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/25/the-rich-dont-like-mutual-funds-but-vanguard-is-a-standout/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>John Bogle</category><category>JohnBogle</category><category>Mutual Funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>Robert Kiyosaki</category><category>RobertKiyosaki</category><category>Vanguard Group</category><category>VanguardGroup</category><category>Wealth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
