<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Vanguard Lowers the Bar on Admirals]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/vanguard-lowers-the-bar-on-admirals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/vanguard-lowers-the-bar-on-admirals/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/vanguard-lowers-the-bar-on-admirals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bnd/" rel="tag">Vanguard Total Bond Market (BND)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Vanguard logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/vanguard-logo-240.jpg" /><em>By Dan Wiener</em><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.investorplace.com/stock-picks/mutual-funds">Mutual funds information</a> is released every day, and on October 6, Vanguard launched yet another offensive in the continuing battle over operating expenses and fund minimums, significantly reducing the entry price for a majority of its funds' lower-cost Admiral share class.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/vanguard-lowers-the-bar-on-admirals/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Vanguard Lowers the Bar on Admirals</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/vanguard-lowers-the-bar-on-admirals/">Vanguard Lowers the Bar on Admirals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/vanguard-lowers-the-bar-on-admirals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19678994/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/19/vanguard-lowers-the-bar-on-admirals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>admiral shares</category><category>Mutual funds</category><category>vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest blogger]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Jumpy stock market but Special 'K' doing fine]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cit/" rel="tag">CIT Group (CIT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bnd/" rel="tag">Vanguard Total Bond Market (BND)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/pumpkin.jpg" alt="" />What a week it was and it is starting off with more of the same! The day before Halloween the market gets spooked. The Dow drops 200 one day, rises 200 the next, and falls 250 to close the week. Yes, financial pundits could point to meaningful stories about the dollars rise, consumer spending sagging, the recession ending and so forth to explain market reactions but there is more to it than that.<br /><br />Even among the 15 positions discussed in <a target="_blank" title="View Where should granny put $50,000? on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/">Where should granny put $50,000?</a> only the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vanguard-bd-index-fd-inc/bnd/nys">Vanguard Total Bond Market</a> exchange-traded fund (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vanguard-bd-index-fd-inc/bnd/nys">BND</a>) and the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys">Kellogg Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys">K</a>) were up last Friday. Good thing I advised "granny" to put half her funds in the ETF.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Jumpy stock market but Special 'K' doing fine</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/">Serious Money: Jumpy stock market but Special 'K' doing fine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19217894/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/serious-money-jumpy-stock-market-but-special-k-doing-fine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BND</category><category>CIT</category><category>F</category><category>featured</category><category>ford motor co.</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>K</category><category>kellogg company</category><category>KelloggCompany</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Total Bond Fund</category><category>TotalBondFund</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where should granny put $50,000?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deo/" rel="tag">Diageo plc (DEO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jnj/" rel="tag">Johnson and Johnson (JNJ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mo/" rel="tag">Altria Group (MO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nvs/" rel="tag">Novartis AG ADS (NVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adp/" rel="tag">Automatic Data Proc (ADP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ed/" rel="tag">Consolidated Edison (ED)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gis/" rel="tag">General Mills (GIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/duk/" rel="tag">Duke Energy (DUK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/so/" rel="tag">Southern Company (SO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nly/" rel="tag">Annaly Capital Management (NLY)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/question-mark01.jpg" />One of my wonderful friends, Ms. P, asked me for some guidance on how she might allocate $50,000 currently earning peanuts in a money market account. Though she is decades from becoming a grandmother, after a brief discussion about her financial parameters, it became clear to me that she was looking for a "granny fund."<br /><br />In reality, my recommendations would be suitable, and perhaps desirable, for many passive investors as well.<br /><br />The $50,000 is a portion of money Ms. P has set aside to purchase a home, which might happen in six months, but could also be pushed out further, depending on the economy and her situation. Basically, she wants to cover all her bases because she might need the money at any time and does not want to be caught short, while at the same time she would like to generate some revenue without taking any big risks. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Where should granny put $50,000?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/">Where should granny put $50,000?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19185367/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/where-should-granny-put-50-000/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>altria</category><category>annalycapitalmanagement</category><category>automatic data processing</category><category>AutomaticDataProcessing</category><category>BND</category><category>Condsolidated Edison</category><category>CondsolidatedEdison</category><category>DEO</category><category>diageo plc</category><category>DiageoPlc</category><category>DUK</category><category>duke</category><category>ED</category><category>featured</category><category>general mills</category><category>GeneralMills</category><category>GIS</category><category>JNJ</category><category>johnsonandjohnson</category><category>K</category><category>kelloggs</category><category>MCD</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>merck</category><category>MO</category><category>MRK</category><category>NLY</category><category>novartis</category><category>NVS</category><category>PG</category><category>procter and gamble</category><category>ProcterAndGamble</category><category>sheldon liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>SO</category><category>southern company</category><category>SouthernCompany</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Six technical trades that are off the charts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/6-technical-trades-that-are-off-the-charts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/6-technical-trades-that-are-off-the-charts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/6-technical-trades-that-are-off-the-charts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdo/" rel="tag">Family Dollar Stores (FDO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hon/" rel="tag">Honeywell Intl (HON)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/utx/" rel="tag">United Technologies (UTX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/teva/" rel="tag">Teva Pharm Indus ADR (TEVA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="technical analysis trades" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/pen.jpg" width="150" height="200" />If you're looking for the most accurate way to predict the direction a stock or the market is headed, <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/learn-more/optionszone-experts/technical-analysis-101.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd" target="_blank">technical analysis</a> is it.</p>
<p>Of course, no chart pattern is accurate all of the time (which is why technical analysis is more of an art than a science), but it's the closest you're going to get to a sure thing in the stock market.</p>
<p>So I'm offering up six technical trades today. Each of these stocks' charts are giving off extremely bullish signals and look ready to run higher.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/6-technical-trades-that-are-off-the-charts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Six technical trades that are off the charts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/6-technical-trades-that-are-off-the-charts/">Six technical trades that are off the charts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 05 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/6-technical-trades-that-are-off-the-charts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19151384/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/05/6-technical-trades-that-are-off-the-charts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>diamond offshore drilling</category><category>DO</category><category>family dollar stores</category><category>FDO</category><category>featured</category><category>HON</category><category>honeywell international</category><category>sam collins</category><category>stocks to buy</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>technical trades</category><category>TEVA</category><category>teva pharmaceutical</category><category>united technologies</category><category>UTX</category><category>vanguard</category><category>VEU</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Collins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Global water shortages? Buy PHO, a commodity ETF]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/global-water-shortages-buy-pho-a-commodity-etf/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/global-water-shortages-buy-pho-a-commodity-etf/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/global-water-shortages-buy-pho-a-commodity-etf/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/clevelanddam.jpg" />One of the most valuable commodities in the world is water -- without it, mankind can't survive. While more than 70% of the Earth's surface is covered by water, but 97% of it is saltwater and only 1% of the remaining 3% is readily available for consumption. Water is becoming scarce, and upcoming water shortages are emerging as the population of the world increases, particularly in emerging markets like China, India, and Mexico.</p>
<p>A great way to include water as part of your portfolio's commodity allocation is by buying an <a href="http://www.marketriders.com/etfs-index-mutual-funds">exchange-traded fund</a> (ETF). An ETF is a basket of stocks that allow you to invest in a single asset class, sector, country, or theme with one stock. In one ETF, you'll own not only water utility companies but also related businesses, like those that help build the infrastructure for making water suitable for drinking. You won't have to pick a single stock, rather you can own the most important stocks in the water industry -- worldwide. ETFs are perfect building blocks for building a diversified portfolio using an <a href="http://www.marketriders.com/education">asset allocation strategy</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/global-water-shortages-buy-pho-a-commodity-etf/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Global water shortages? Buy PHO, a commodity ETF</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/global-water-shortages-buy-pho-a-commodity-etf/">Global water shortages? Buy PHO, a commodity ETF</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/global-water-shortages-buy-pho-a-commodity-etf/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19136847/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/24/global-water-shortages-buy-pho-a-commodity-etf/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>asset allocation</category><category>etfs</category><category>investing</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>personal finance</category><category>retirement</category><category>retirement planning</category><category>vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch Tuchman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: ETF that's better than cash]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/serious-money-etf-thats-better-than-cash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/serious-money-etf-thats-better-than-cash/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/serious-money-etf-thats-better-than-cash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/money101807.jpg" alt="" />During the last eight months, with the market bouncing up and down, there have been times when I did not look too smart buying stocks through it all.</p>
<p>Of course I looked the most foolish on March 9, when I wrote the prophetic <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/nostradamus-was-a-punk-have-we-reached-bottom/" title="View Nostradamus was a punk! Have we reached bottom? on BloggingStocks">Nostradamus was a punk! Have we reached bottom?</a> Some folks were commenting that they were staying in cash until the DJIA dropped to 5,000. Today that looks highly improbable, even if the market gives something back over the next few months.</p>
<p>There must be some readers that also have contrarian instincts and made good money this year. This is a reminder to<strong><em> take something off the table.</em></strong> It's time to book some gains. We all did great in 1999 and 2000 only to give it all back and then some. Don't let that happen to you again!</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/serious-money-etf-thats-better-than-cash/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: ETF that's better than cash</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/serious-money-etf-thats-better-than-cash/">Serious Money: ETF that's better than cash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 May 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/serious-money-etf-thats-better-than-cash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1551798/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/20/serious-money-etf-thats-better-than-cash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bonds</category><category>ETF</category><category>exchange-traded funds</category><category>Exchange-tradedFunds</category><category>featured</category><category>proftis</category><category>serious money</category><category>SeriousMoney</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>Vanguard</category><category>yield investing</category><category>YieldInvesting</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[John Bogle: Bringing back the uptick rule won't solve anything]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/john-bogle-on-why-bringing-back-the-uptick-rule-wont-solve-anyt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/john-bogle-on-why-bringing-back-the-uptick-rule-wont-solve-anyt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/john-bogle-on-why-bringing-back-the-uptick-rule-wont-solve-anyt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/define/" rel="tag">Define Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img width="142" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="204" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/51ztydd0xwl.jpg" alt="" />WIth the market tanking, short sellers have become a popular scapegoat. Some observers whine about naked short selling while others lament the end to the uptick rule, suggesting that that has been a driving force behind the market turmoil.<br /><br />Vanguard Group founder John Bogle, one of the few heroes in a financial services industry filled with villains, has a <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122765847354258315.html?mod=todays_us_opinion">letter</a> in today's <em>Wall Street Journal </em>explaining why the "blame the shorts!" explanation is wrong. He states it simply:<br /><em><br />The uptick rule will not prevent price declines or bear raids. These events can and will continue to occur when security prices are too high compared with a company's earning prospects and risk.<br /></em><br />Exactly!<br /><br />The reality is that bubbles in equities form, and policies that make short-selling more difficult allow markets to overheat and inflate. Now that the party is over, angry investors are lashing out at short sellers.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/john-bogle-on-why-bringing-back-the-uptick-rule-wont-solve-anyt/">John Bogle: Bringing back the uptick rule won't solve anything</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122765847354258315.html?mod=todays_us_opinion>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/john-bogle-on-why-bringing-back-the-uptick-rule-wont-solve-anyt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1383625/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/26/john-bogle-on-why-bringing-back-the-uptick-rule-wont-solve-anyt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>john bogle</category><category>JohnBogle</category><category>Short Selling</category><category>ShortSelling</category><category>Uptick Rule</category><category>UptickRule</category><category>vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The safest money spot I can find: TIPS funds]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/the-safest-money-spot-i-can-find-tips-funds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/the-safest-money-spot-i-can-find-tips-funds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/the-safest-money-spot-i-can-find-tips-funds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="piggy bank" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/piggy-bank-header-at244-by-g.e.sattler.jpg" />While researching opinions for a column I'm writing about people's current retirement attitudes, I've been led to one particularly important question: what would I myself do if I had money to invest for retirement? <br /><br />The first part of my answer is simple. I have a fairly well performing 401k account through my employer and I stick as much money in that account as I can stand. But what if I had excess funds which I wanted to put into safe haven for the future, what would I do right now? At this point, I believe the option I would use is Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS).<br /><br />You must understand that I hate bonds. I hate them because I think that they're typically very lazy. They generally pay low rates of return and they sometimes lack liquidity. However, with today's extreme investment volatility, I have come to recognize the intrinsic wisdom of government backed bonds. The nice thing about TIPS is that they come with inflation protection built right in.<br /><br />I did a little research, and I found a short discussion about TIPS funds at <a href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/pf/0805/gallery.only_investments.moneymag/6.html">CNN Money.com</a>. The article mentions a TIPS fund which is managed by Vanguard, a name which I place a fairly high degree of trust in. The article indicates that the Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vanguard-inflation-protected-securities-fund/vipsx/nmf">VIPSX</a>) has an acceptable rate of return and low operating fees. If I had a large sum of cash which I just wanted to place in a save haven until this bear market runs its course, I believe that this <a href="https://institutional.vanguard.com/VGApp/iip/site/institutional/investments/productoverview?strategy=971226226">Vanguard fund </a>might be one of my first choices.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/the-safest-money-spot-i-can-find-tips-funds/">The safest money spot I can find: TIPS funds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/pf/0805/gallery.only_investments.moneymag/6.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/the-safest-money-spot-i-can-find-tips-funds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1375226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/the-safest-money-spot-i-can-find-tips-funds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>government securities</category><category>GovernmentSecurities</category><category>retirement</category><category>savings bonds</category><category>SavingsBonds</category><category>TIPS</category><category>treasury inflation protected securities</category><category>TreasuryInflationProtectedSecurities</category><category>vanguard</category><category>vipsx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where you should put your money now: 10 options, starting with the safest]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/where-you-should-put-your-money-now-10-options/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/where-you-should-put-your-money-now-10-options/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/where-you-should-put-your-money-now-10-options/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dan_solin_5668-%28wince%29.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Investors are scared. The value of their portfolios has plummeted. Now many are seeking safety instead of returns.<br /><br />If you are one of those investors, you need to understand the different levels of security in the options available to protect you.<br /><br />But first, ask whether capital preservation is really the right goal for you.<br /><br />If you anticipate needing 20% or more of your assets within a five year period, you should not have any exposure to the stock market. You need the confidence of knowing your money will be there when you need it. You cannot afford the kind of market volatility we are experiencing that could cause you to sell at a loss to pay living expenses.<br /><br />You have a number of choices outside the stock market. As with all investments, you are rewarded for taking risk. Remember: <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The most secure choices will pay the lowest interest.</span> <br /><br />The liquidity crunch is having unprecedented ramifications in markets that were traditionally regarded as very safe. Many financial experts now regard only cash and debt secured by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government as <em>really</em> safe.<br /><u><strong><br /></strong></u><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/where-you-should-put-your-money-now-10-options/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Where you should put your money now: 10 options, starting with the safest</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/where-you-should-put-your-money-now-10-options/">Where you should put your money now: 10 options, starting with the safest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/where-you-should-put-your-money-now-10-options/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1337553/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/14/where-you-should-put-your-money-now-10-options/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>asset allocation</category><category>AssetAllocation</category><category>bonds</category><category>cash</category><category>money market funds</category><category>MoneyMarketFunds</category><category>stocks</category><category>target retirement funds</category><category>TargetRetirementFunds</category><category>vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Solin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Naked Truth Investing: The secret hidden deep inside the indictment of the Bear Stearns hedge fund managers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/naked-truth-investing-the-secret-hidden-deep-inside-the-indictm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/naked-truth-investing-the-secret-hidden-deep-inside-the-indictm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/naked-truth-investing-the-secret-hidden-deep-inside-the-indictm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img height="147" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dan_solin_5668-%28wince%29.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /> <em>This is the part of a new series of columns called "The Naked Truth," by retirement expert Dan Solin. Please bring him your questions, in the comments box, and he will answer as many as he can.</em></p>
<p>Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin were indicted on June 18, 2008. They are accused of a litany of fraudulent activities in connection with the demise of two hedge funds they managed for Bear Stearns.</p>
<p>Cioffi and Tannin are entitled to the presumption of innocence. The obligatory "perp walk," staged for the benefit of the press, is offensive to traditional notions of justice. Not only does it demean and humiliate them, it taints the jury pool and intrudes upon their right to a fair trial.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the indictment offers an insight into conduct that would otherwise be inexplicable.</p>
<p>Here are two highly educated, sophisticated, fund managers who achieved the American dream -- and then some. Why would they risk it all by, as alleged, misrepresenting the risk of these funds, and their personal stake in them?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/naked-truth-investing-the-secret-hidden-deep-inside-the-indictm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Naked Truth Investing: The secret hidden deep inside the indictment of the Bear Stearns hedge fund managers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/naked-truth-investing-the-secret-hidden-deep-inside-the-indictm/">Naked Truth Investing: The secret hidden deep inside the indictment of the Bear Stearns hedge fund managers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/naked-truth-investing-the-secret-hidden-deep-inside-the-indictm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1232671/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/naked-truth-investing-the-secret-hidden-deep-inside-the-indictm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>Dan Solin</category><category>featured</category><category>Fidelity</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>Matthew Tannin</category><category>Naked Truth Investing</category><category>Ralph Cioffi</category><category>retirement</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Solin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart sued over excessive mutual fund expenses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/wal-mart-sued-over-excessive-mutual-fund-expenses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/wal-mart-sued-over-excessive-mutual-fund-expenses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/wal-mart-sued-over-excessive-mutual-fund-expenses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/wmt-wal-mart-logo.jpg" alt="" />Here's an item that will give more ammunition to the anti <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) crowd -- because they really do need more ammunition.<br /><br /><em>Pensions &amp; Investments</em> <a href="http://www.pionline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080428/PRINTSUB/565941608/1005">reports</a> that Wal-Mart has been sued for allowing participants in its 401(k) plans to be charged "unreasonably expensive" management fees on the mutuals funds available under the plan. The lawsuit is seeking class-action status, and alleges that the company offered participants retail mutual funds rather than lower-cost institutional funds "despite the ready availability of reasonably priced options ... particularly for a massive plan like Wal-Mart's with tremendous potential to leverage economies of scale."<br /><br />If you're wondering about how you should invest your own money, here's a hint: the lawyers for the plaintiff compared Wal-Mart's high-cost managed funds to the ultra-low cost funds offered by Vanguard. For example, the actively managed retail fund available to Wal-Mart investors has an expense ratio 1.59% vs. 0.55% for a comparable fund. Over time and many billions of dollars, that adds up: The suit is seeking to recoup at least $60 million in allegedly excessive fees.<br /><br />Virtually all intelligent and unbiased personal finance experts suggest that retirement money be invested in ultra-low cost index mutual funds. If a lawsuit is what it takes to make Wal-Mart off that option to its employees, than so be it.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/wal-mart-sued-over-excessive-mutual-fund-expenses/">Wal-Mart sued over excessive mutual fund expenses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 May 2008 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pionline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080428/PRINTSUB/565941608/1005>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/wal-mart-sued-over-excessive-mutual-fund-expenses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1202755/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/22/wal-mart-sued-over-excessive-mutual-fund-expenses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>401k</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Vanguard</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Battle of the Brands: Vanguard vs. Fidelity]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/battle-of-the-brands-vanguard-vs-fidelity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/battle-of-the-brands-vanguard-vs-fidelity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/battle-of-the-brands-vanguard-vs-fidelity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/battle-fidelity-vanguard-200x267dr.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/battle-for-best-brands">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and check out other Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p>To some degree, a face-off between Vanguard and Fidelity is really a face-off between John Bogle, Vanguard's founder, and Peter Lynch, Fidelity's star fund manager. While Bogle was a pioneer in no-load and low-cost investing in index funds, Lynch was a proponent of investing in "what you know," or getting investing ideas from your day-to-day life. BloggingStocks covered this <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-john-bogle-vs-peter-lynch/">Bogle vs. Lynch</a> match up back in September, and readers gave the financial edge to Lynch.</p>
<p>Privately held <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidelity_Investments">Fidelity Investments</a> is made up by two independent but closely cooperating companies: Boston-based Fidelity Management and Research LLC serves the North American market, and Fidelity International Limited (FIL), spun off in 1969, provides investment products and services to clients in the rest of the world. Fidelity reported revenue of $12.87 billion in 2006, by offering a large family of mutual funds, as well as providing discount brokerage services, retirement services, estate planning, wealth management, securities execution and clearance, life insurance, and a number of other financial services. The founding Johnson family still controls Fidelity, but Peter Lynch and some other fund managers also hold stakes in the company.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/battle-of-the-brands-vanguard-vs-fidelity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Battle of the Brands: Vanguard vs. Fidelity</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/battle-of-the-brands-vanguard-vs-fidelity/">Battle of the Brands: Vanguard vs. Fidelity</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/battle-of-the-brands-vanguard-vs-fidelity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1172641/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/30/battle-of-the-brands-vanguard-vs-fidelity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battle of the Brands</category><category>Bogle</category><category>Fidelity</category><category>John Bogle</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>Peter Lynch</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sam Zell sees real estate turnaround this spring]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/sam-zell-sees-real-estate-turnaround-this-spring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/sam-zell-sees-real-estate-turnaround-this-spring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/sam-zell-sees-real-estate-turnaround-this-spring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p>Sam Zell is one of the best real estate investors around and therefore one of the few people whose prognostications for the housing market are actually worth listening to.<br /><br />And that's good news because, speaking on CNBC's Squawk Box this morning, Zell had <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/mergersNews/idUSN2634470220080226">this to say</a> about the housing market: "I think starts have already pretty much bottomed out," Zell said. "I think the housing market this spring will begin its recovery phase."<br /><br />If the recovery will indeed begin that quickly -- and the bottom has already been reached -- than beaten-down REITs have to be considered for investment.<br /><br />If you're willing to invest based on the idea that Zell is likely to be right but aren't comfortable picking REITs on your own, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vanguard-index-fds/vnq/ase">Vanguard's REIT ETF</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vanguard-index-fds/vnq/ase">VNQ</a>) may be worth a look. After a big drop in 2007, the ETF yields around 5%.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/sam-zell-sees-real-estate-turnaround-this-spring/">Sam Zell sees real estate turnaround this spring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/sam-zell-sees-real-estate-turnaround-this-spring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1124814/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/26/sam-zell-sees-real-estate-turnaround-this-spring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ETF</category><category>Housing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>Sam Zell</category><category>SamZell</category><category>Vanguard</category><category>VNQ</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:37:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are derivatives the next shoe to drop?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/are-derivatives-the-next-shoe-to-drop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/are-derivatives-the-next-shoe-to-drop/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/are-derivatives-the-next-shoe-to-drop/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bcs/" rel="tag">Barclays plc ADS (BCS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/wallstpic.jpg"  alt="" />Whenever Wall Street starts packaging a product for the masses that's used by sophisticated investors, you know that there is big trouble ahead. There is no way that an individual investor will be able to value and understand the drivers of that investment's value. And it's fairly certain that Wall Street is packaging the security to enrich itself with fees. Wall Street doesn't have to concern itself with whether its investors make money.</p>
<p>This is the first thing that came to mind when I read a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aLgho_n1fsnU&amp;refer=news"><em>Bloomberg News</em></a> story <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">Barclays Plc </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/barclays-plc-adr/bcs/nys">BCS</a>) introduced a new product that put a scare into <a href="http://www.vanguard.com">Vanguard Group Inc. </a>and the rest of the $13 trillion U.S. mutual-fund industry. The product? An <strong>exchange-traded note (ETN). </strong>I really don't know what it is but the story says that it allows individual investors to buy a type of forward contract linked to commodities and assets ranging from oil to currencies to foreign stock indexes. It has lower fees than mutual funds, is less regulated and, for now, lets holders defer taxable income indefinitely.</p>
<p>It sure sounds great and that's probably why the mutual fund industry is so afraid of it. But before you go out and buy one of those ETNs, make sure you understand how its value is set and what makes that value go up and down everyday. Otherwise you could be in for a rude awakening. Can't figure out how to value an ETN? Then I suggest you hold onto your wallet with two tightly clasped fists. When Wall Street comes calling on Main Street for such complex securities. </p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the letter="" cohan=""></the></em></a><em>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/are-derivatives-the-next-shoe-to-drop/">Are derivatives the next shoe to drop?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aLgho_n1fsnU&amp;refer=news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/are-derivatives-the-next-shoe-to-drop/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1115309/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/are-derivatives-the-next-shoe-to-drop/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barclay's plc</category><category>Barclay'sPlc</category><category>derivatives</category><category>exchange-traded note</category><category>Exchange-tradedNote</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mutal funds</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>Vanguard</category><category>walll street</category><category>WalllStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ Never fear, 2008 will end higher -- think index funds and ETFs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/never-fear-2008-will-end-higher-think-index-funds-and-etfs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/never-fear-2008-will-end-higher-think-index-funds-and-etfs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/never-fear-2008-will-end-higher-think-index-funds-and-etfs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p>In the midst of all the bad news it's hard to imagine the stock market ending the year higher than it started. However, that is entirely possible and probably much better than a 50/50 bet. If you want to play it safe consider buying into an index fund or exchange traded funds (ETFs) instead of <a href="http://money.aol.com/banking">banking</a> on individual stocks.</p>
<p>For broad coverage you cannot beat the <a href="https://personal.vanguard.com/us/content/Home/WhyVanguard/AboutVanguardOVContent.jsp?fromPage=portal">Vanguard </a><em>Total Stock Market</em> or the <em>Total International Stock</em> funds with the lowest fees and longest history in this area. I think it has also been generally accepted <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing">investing</a> strategy over the last few decades that in bearish markets there is a run to quality and "guns and butter" stocks. If you were to follow this old adage you would be considering three sectors, healthcare, defense and consumer staples.</p>
<p>Mutual funds and ETFs (with less history) are less volatile and offer greater diversification than most investors could achieve, and at much lower cost. If you dollar cost average over the next few months you should also be able to smooth out some bumps in the current market.</p>
<p>When the political machine goes to work to juice the economy the market has most often responded positively. That does not mean it's smart for the country, but since when is a politicians first thought about the country. </p>
<p><em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/never-fear-2008-will-end-higher-think-index-funds-and-etfs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em> Never fear, 2008 will end higher -- think index funds and ETFs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/never-fear-2008-will-end-higher-think-index-funds-and-etfs/"> Never fear, 2008 will end higher -- think index funds and ETFs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/never-fear-2008-will-end-higher-think-index-funds-and-etfs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1089656/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/18/never-fear-2008-will-end-higher-think-index-funds-and-etfs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer staples</category><category>ConsumerStaples</category><category>defense</category><category>ETF</category><category>ETF's</category><category>healthcare</category><category>Mututal funds</category><category>MututalFunds</category><category>Presidential elections</category><category>PresidentialElections</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>the economy</category><category>TheEconomy</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[John Bogle on the market, subprime, career advice and real estate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/john-bogle-on-the-market-subprime-career-advice-and-real-esta/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/john-bogle-on-the-market-subprime-career-advice-and-real-esta/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/john-bogle-on-the-market-subprime-career-advice-and-real-esta/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/newsletter-riskreward-02.jpg" alt="" />There are a handful or business commentators who are worth dropping everything and listening to, and I would put Vanguard Group founder John Bogle at the top of my list.<br /><br />So that means everyone should drop everything and go read <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/12/24/101939724/index.htm?postversion=2007121711">this interview</a> he did with <em>Fortune</em>.<br /><br />Always logical, some of Bogle's best wisdom comes on the topic of the bad mortgages that banks and hedge funds found themselves loading up on. Talking about his own experience making fixed income investments at Vanguard, he said this.:<blockquote><em>The fixed income area is a stupid place to take risk. So, when someone came in and said, we can earn an extra half percent on this bond, I would say, do you think it has any higher risk? If not, why are they offering us an extra half percent?</em></blockquote> It's absolutely fascinating that all these ostensibly intelligent people loaded up on subprime debt thinking that they could earn a higher yield without adding risk.<br /><br />Forget complex reforms and more training -- maybe the executives who got their firms into this mess should have the graph above tattooed to their foreheads.<br /><br />Check out the Bogle interview for his insight on other topics -- including his guess at the odds of a recession.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/john-bogle-on-the-market-subprime-career-advice-and-real-esta/">John Bogle on the market, subprime, career advice and real estate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/12/24/101939724/index.htm?postversion=2007121711>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/john-bogle-on-the-market-subprime-career-advice-and-real-esta/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1065749/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/john-bogle-on-the-market-subprime-career-advice-and-real-esta/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bogle</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>Jack Bogle</category><category>JackBogle</category><category>John Bogle</category><category>JohnBogle</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><category>SubprimeMortgages</category><category>the fed</category><category>TheFed</category><category>vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Serious Money: Electric utilities are the place to be]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/serious-money-in-volatile-markets-electric-utilities-are-the-p/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/serious-money-in-volatile-markets-electric-utilities-are-the-p/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/serious-money-in-volatile-markets-electric-utilities-are-the-p/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/duk/" rel="tag">Duke Energy (DUK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hnp/" rel="tag">Huaneng Power Intl ADS (HNP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/" rel="tag">Serious Money</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pcg/" rel="tag">PG and E Corporation (PCG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/so/" rel="tag">Southern Company (SO)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dwstucke/18629262/"><img alt="Light bulb " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/light-bulb.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>The more questions you have these days about the investment world, and the more concerned you are about economy over the next few years, the more you should have some of your assets in electric utilities. Regardless if our nation makes a push toward nuclear, solar, or wind power or does nothing at all, electric utilities will remain the big players. Year in and year out they have a stable customer base, pay a higher dividend yield and have a much higher level of predictability than almost any other investment class.</p>
<p>Another factor that is likely to contribute to the growth of electric utilities is the push toward electric "plug-in" cars. I have not done any analysis as to how this will affect global warming, the price of gas, the quality of air, or total national energy consumption, but those issues aside, if we change even 25% of the nation's automobiles to all-electric over the next ten years, that is a lot of growth. </p>
<p>Historically, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-utilities-index/%24util/dji">Dow Jones <strong>Utilities</strong> Average</a> has beaten the pants off the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dow-jones-industrial-average-index/$indu/dji">Dow Jones <strong>Industrial</strong> Average</a> for total return. There are short periods of time when the <em>Industrials</em> jump past the <em>Utilities</em>, but over the long haul, investors have done much better with what seems like the less attention-grabbing, boring old utilities. Choosing boring stocks remind you of anyone? Yes, <em>"My Pal Warren"</em> has been buying these boring stocks over the last decade (adding to his others in chocolate, underwear, ice cream and insurance) and you can see the results in the five-year chart comparing the two Dow indices.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/serious-money-in-volatile-markets-electric-utilities-are-the-p/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Serious Money: Electric utilities are the place to be</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/serious-money-in-volatile-markets-electric-utilities-are-the-p/">Serious Money: Electric utilities are the place to be</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/serious-money-in-volatile-markets-electric-utilities-are-the-p/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1044554/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/serious-money-in-volatile-markets-electric-utilities-are-the-p/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>duk</category><category>duke energy</category><category>DukeEnergy</category><category>etf</category><category>featured</category><category>hnp</category><category>huaneng power</category><category>HuanengPower</category><category>pcg</category><category>pg and e</category><category>PgAndE</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>so</category><category>southern company</category><category>SouthernCompany</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[529 plans great choice for college savings, but pick carefully]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/529-plans-great-choice-for-college-savings-but-pick-carefully/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/529-plans-great-choice-for-college-savings-but-pick-carefully/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/529-plans-great-choice-for-college-savings-but-pick-carefully/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gettingstarted/" rel="tag">Getting Started</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/define/" rel="tag">Define Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>Want to save for college, but not sure what type of account to use? State-sponsored 529 plans should definitely be your first choice. You don't have to pick one from your own state, but tax incentives might encourage you to do so. If your state doesn't off good tax incentives for colleges savings, then look for the plan with the lowest fees.<span style="font-style: italic;"> Kiplinger's</span> gives you an excellent <a href="http://money.aol.com/kiplingers/investing/canvas3/_a/the-best-way-to-save-for-college/20070920135509990001">overview of your options</a>, as well as a <a href="http://content.kiplinger.com/features/archives/2007/08/best529s.html">state by state run down</a>.</p>
<p>These state-sponsored plans can give you shelter from both federal and state income taxes, as well as give your child's grandparents a good way to chip in for their grandchild's education. In fact a grandparent can contribute up to $12,000 a year without having to worry about federal gift taxes (a couple can contribute up to $24,000 without gift taxes). If one grandchild decides not to go to college, just switch the account into the name of another child that wants to go. The money in the fund grows tax-deferred and as long as you only use it for qualified educational expenses you don't ever have to pay taxes on the gains. </p>
<p>You also don't have to worry about saving too much. The federal financial-aid formula assesses parent-owned accounts at 5.6%, while student savings can be assessed a whopping 20%. But, if you want to avoid taxes you must use the funds for qualified education expenses, so you don't want to save more than you think your child will need for college.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/529-plans-great-choice-for-college-savings-but-pick-carefully/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>529 plans great choice for college savings, but pick carefully</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/529-plans-great-choice-for-college-savings-but-pick-carefully/">529 plans great choice for college savings, but pick carefully</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/kiplingers/investing/canvas3/_a/the-best-way-to-save-for-college/20070920135509990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/529-plans-great-choice-for-college-savings-but-pick-carefully/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1035677/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/12/529-plans-great-choice-for-college-savings-but-pick-carefully/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>529 plans</category><category>529Plans</category><category>college savings</category><category>CollegeSavings</category><category>kiplingers</category><category>personal finance</category><category>PersonalFinance</category><category>tiaa-cref</category><category>vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vanguard set to launch mega-cap mutual fund]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/vanguard-set-to-launch-mega-cap-mutual-fund/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/vanguard-set-to-launch-mega-cap-mutual-fund/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/vanguard-set-to-launch-mega-cap-mutual-fund/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a></p>Even though I would argue that the Vanguard Group is still the greatest financial services company in the world, it's amazing how far the firm has strayed from its founder <a href="http://www.investopedia.com/university/greatest/johnbogle.asp">Jack Bogle's</a> original vision.<br /><br /><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119076704878739412.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing">According</a> to (subscription required) <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, Vanguard is starting a new mutual fund that invests exclusively in mega-cap companies -- those with market caps from $3 billion to around $500 billion. According to <em>The Journal</em>, "Vanguard has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to launch the Mega Cap 300 Index, Mega Cap 300 Value Index and Mega Cap 300 Growth Index funds. The funds, which will be introduced in December, will track the market-capitalization-weighted MSCI US Large Cap 300 Index and its value and growth subsets."<br /><br />Exchange-traded, institutional, and investor share classes will be available and, like most Vanguard funds, the expense ratios will be terrific. <br /><br />I just don't get the point of these funds, and I certainly don't see why any investor would want to rush out and buy them. There aren't that many mega-cap stocks so diversification could be an issue and, all of the companies are already covered by traditional broad-based market index funds.<br /><br />It seems that the more that traditional index funds are "improved," the more they shift away from the principles that guided Bogle when he invented the first index fund for individual investors in 1975.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/vanguard-set-to-launch-mega-cap-mutual-fund/">Vanguard set to launch mega-cap mutual fund</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119076704878739412.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/vanguard-set-to-launch-mega-cap-mutual-fund/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/998419/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/vanguard-set-to-launch-mega-cap-mutual-fund/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Jack Bogle</category><category>JackBogle</category><category>Mutual Funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>Vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Companies cave into helicopter parents]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/companies-cave-into-helicopter-parents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/companies-cave-into-helicopter-parents/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/companies-cave-into-helicopter-parents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a></p><p>When I graduated college, the idea of having my parents negotiate a job offer for me would have sent shivers down my spine. Apparently, this current generation has no such qualms.</p>
<p>They call them "helicopter parents," and according to the <em><a href="http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/7356251.html">Philadelphia Inquirer</a></em>, they are annoying some of the biggest names in corporate America including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch &amp; Co</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>) and <a href="http://www.vanguard.com/">The Vanguard Group</a>.</p>
<p>What's even more shocking is that the hiring managers are <strong>ACCOMMODATING</strong> these overbearing people. They are taking a page from the U.S. Army, which now targets its advertising to prospective recruits. The world has certainly changed since I graduated college in 1991 and not for the better. </p>
<p>If I were a hiring manager, I would immediately revoke any job offer for those who had their mom or dad act as their agent. That is ridiculous.</p>
<p>If you are unable to speak for yourself when you graduate college, something has gone terribly wrong. Do today's twenty-somethings expect mom and dad to fight all of their workplace battles for them? When does it stop? This isn't healthy for either parent or child.</p>
<p>Helicopter parents are the types of people who would wrap their children in bubble wrap to protect them from all of life's disappointments. They make sure that no kid gets cut from a sports team and that everyone gets a trophy. These days, there are no winners and losers.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, life doesn't work that way.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/companies-cave-into-helicopter-parents/">Companies cave into helicopter parents</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 May 2007 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/7356251.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/companies-cave-into-helicopter-parents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/890365/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/companies-cave-into-helicopter-parents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>children</category><category>ge</category><category>helicopter parents</category><category>HelicopterParents</category><category>job market</category><category>JobMarket</category><category>mer</category><category>parents</category><category>vanguard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
