<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Why shouldn't Vijay Singh keep wearing his Stanford Financial hat?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/why-shouldnt-vijay-singh-keep-wearing-his-stanford-financial-ha/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/why-shouldnt-vijay-singh-keep-wearing-his-stanford-financial-ha/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/why-shouldnt-vijay-singh-keep-wearing-his-stanford-financial-ha/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p>Back in February, I wrote about one of the stranger elements of the Stanford Financial ponzi scheme scandal: PGA Tour star Vijay Singh was still wearing his Stanford Financial hat, as though nothing had happened.<br /><br /><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/singh.jpg" /><br /><br />It turns out he's still wearing it, and the <a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/06162009/business/hats_off_to_vijay_singhs_drive_toward_lo_174460.htm?page=0"><span style="font-style: italic;">New York Post</span> explains why</a>:<br />
<p> <em>Nope, the word is that Singh is just stubborn and -- here's a word you don't hear often these days -- loyal. And, oddly enough, I find that sort of refreshing even if the allegiance is to an alleged thief. </em></p>
<p><em> Singh's representatives say "Vijay is staying with the status quo until there is something more definitive re: Stanford." Hats off to him. </em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/why-shouldnt-vijay-singh-keep-wearing-his-stanford-financial-ha/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why shouldn't Vijay Singh keep wearing his Stanford Financial hat?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/why-shouldnt-vijay-singh-keep-wearing-his-stanford-financial-ha/">Why shouldn't Vijay Singh keep wearing his Stanford Financial hat?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/06162009/business/hats_off_to_vijay_singhs_drive_toward_lo_174460.htm?page=0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/why-shouldnt-vijay-singh-keep-wearing-his-stanford-financial-ha/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19069944/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/17/why-shouldnt-vijay-singh-keep-wearing-his-stanford-financial-ha/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Stanford Financial</category><category>StanfordFinancial</category><category>Vijay Singh</category><category>VijaySingh</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
