Citigroup (NYSE: C) CEO Vikram Pandit was a famous hedge-fund manager. After Citi bought his company, he was in a position to move into the top job. It is lucky he was moved into the corner office months ago as one of the funds Citi picked up from the company he sold them is being closed.

According to The Wall Street Journal, "Mr. Pandit personally reaped at least $165 million when Citigroup bought Old Lane in July 2007." Nice work if you can get it.

The news may say little about Pandit's money management skills as he has been away from the running of the fund, Old Lane, for some time. It does, however, put the spotlight on him once again at a time when his ability to run Citi is being questioned by the company's shareholders.

Pandit was brought in as an agent of change, no matter how awful and overused that term is. So far, he has done absolutely nothing to deserve that description. Yesterday, Citi stock fell below $20 for the first time since March. Investors had hoped he would begin to sell of some of the bank's less critical assets to build the the capital base of the firm.

Instead, he has acted pretty much the same as his predecessor Chuck Prince. The share price points to that.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor a 247wallst.com

MAJOR PAPERS:

• Investors are taking their money out of hedge funds more now that at any time over the past 10 years, according to the Wall Street Journal. Firms are bracing for the end of June when the next big wave will hit.
• First it was a demand for management changes, and now shareholders, including one time director Eli Broad and fund managers Shelby Davis of Davis Selected Advisors and Bill Miller of Legg Mason Inc (NYSE: LM), are again upset with American International Group Inc (NYSE: AIG) and want changes in the boardroom as well, the Wall Street Journal reported.
• The Wall Street Journal reported that Citigroup Incorporated (NYSE: C) will close Old Lane Partners, a hedge fund co-founded by CEO Vikram Pandit.

OTHER PAPERS:

• Spotlight Capital is increasing pressure on Chico's FAS Inc (NYSE: CHS) and said it has been in touch with 25 major shareholders in order to oust CEO Scott Edmonds and unseat board member John Burden, who are accused of having a conflict of interest, the New York Post reported.

WEB SITES:

• Advanced Micro Devices Inc (NYSE: AMD) denied reports certain of its new dual-core chip, code-named Kuma, have been canceled, according to CNet. A spokesman for the company said that the launch of Kuma, scheduled for the second half of 2008, remains on track.

Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) is unmanageable. That's my conclusion after trying to understand its latest quarterly report. The concept behind this 100-armed corporate octopus is that people like to buy all their financial services in one place and therefore it makes sense to be able to sell them a full line of products from stocks to bank accounts. But I suspect that customers don't want all their financial eggs in one basket, so the concept is fatally flawed.

Moreover, its financial performance reveals that Citi is a complex mess whose many different businesses do not diversify its earnings streams. According to its quarterly report, Citi lost $5.1 billion. Most of the losses came from its Securities and Banking (-$6.4 billion), Alternative Investments (-$509 million), and U.S. Consumer (-$476 million) units. Two bright spots were $1.3 billion in earnings from International Consumer and $732 million in Transaction Services.

But wait, there's more in its huge, risky portfolio. Citi has $40 trillion in derivatives -- enormous bets on interest rates and currencies. And it has $1.2 trillion worth of off-balance sheet entities (remember Enron?). Nobody really knows what these are worth or how much they'll cost. And that doesn't even get us to the $262 billion in Level 3 assets -- illiquid, difficult-to-value securities -- which are 2.1 times Citi's $128 billion in capital. That's a pretty thin cushion for future write-downs.

MAJOR PAPERS:

• Harris Corporation (NYSE: HRS), concerned about its future growth, may see limited opportunity and may consider selling itself, the Wall Street Journal reported. If it does decide to sell, suitors could include Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN), BAE Systems Plc (OTC: BAESY) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC).
• The Wall Street Journal reported that, in an attempt to toughen its regulation standards, SEC chairman Christopher Cox said earlier this week the agency would push Wall Street investment houses will have to reduce borrowing and rely less on short-term financing.
• As part of plans to reduce costs and restore profit growth, people close to the situation said that Citigroup Incorporated (NYSE: C) is likely to today identify up to $400B in non-core assets that could be sold. Additionally, the Financial Times reported that Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit will confirm his pledge to cut the bank's cost base by about 20% at a meeting with analysts today. Sources familiar with the matter believe Pandit will dismiss calls for a break-up of the company.

OTHER PAPERS:

• According to sources, the New York Post reported that the ax may fall as early as next week on some investment bankers at The Bear Stearns Companies Inc (NYSE: BSC).

MAJOR PAPERS:

• Three years into its $35B takeover of Nextel, the Wall Street Journal reported that Sprint Nextel Corporation (NYSE: S) is considering selling or spinning off the troubled unit. Few details were available and a deal is not imminent.
• The Wall Street Journal also reported that pressure is mounting on Citigroup Incorporated's (NYSE: C) CEO Vikram Pandit to show that he can turn around the troubled bank. Executives believe Pandit, who has been praised for his cautious and deliberate approach, has been taking "too long" to make crucial decisions.

WEB SITES:

• According to a person close to Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG), Reuters reported that Google and Yahoo! Inc (NASDAQ: YHOO) are still "hammering out the intricacies" of a potential advertising and search deal. The source said no final agreement has been reached yet.
• ABC News learned that if Rupert Murdoch does not testify in a lawsuit accusing one of his companies of "corporate espionage," it may cost News Corporation (NYSE: NWS) hundreds of millions of dollars, a federal judge overseeing the trial said. News Corp has denied any wrongdoing, and lawyers maintain Murdoch had no direct knowledge of the unit's alleged hacking into EchoStar Corporation's (NASDAQ: SATS)/DISH Network Corporation's (NASDAQ: DISH) security code and posting it on the Internet.

MAJOR PAPERS:

• Luqman Arnold, the former UBS AG (NYSE: UBS) president forced out in 2001, wants the firm to split its investment bank from the private client bank, and look at selling the investment bank and asset management business, according to the Wall Street Journal's "Heard on the Street".
• Microsoft Corporation's (NASDAQ: MSFT) bid to acquire Yahoo! Inc (NASDAQ: YHOO) has not gained any steam even though executives of the two companies met this week, the Wall Street Journal reported.
• The Financial Times reported that the landmark merger that created Citigroup Incorporated (NYSE: C) was a "mistake" that failed to benefit the financial services giant's investors, customers and employees, said John Reed, who masterminded the $166B deal with Sandy Weill in 1998. Reed, the former head of Citicorp, has advised Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit at least to consider spin-offs, sources said.

WEB SITES:

• Walgreen Co (NYSE: WAG) is branching out by acquiring two companies that provide health-care services, BusinessWeek reported, following in its competitor CVS Caremark Corporation's (NYSE: CVS) shoes. Some investors are wary of Walgreen's move, but Mark Wiltamuth of Morgan Stanley sees it as a new growth avenue and as a push into services complementary to drugstores.

TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer wonders -- can we handle this giant's failure?

As always, it is Citigroup (NYSE: C) (Cramer's Take). My smartest guys tell me that Citigroup has billions in assets it can sell, that there is ample opportunity for the company to reliquify, that Vikram Pandit has things under control and the slow bleed cuts are going to work to get costs down.

Now I have total confidence in Treasury, particularly in Bob Steel, to take care of the shorts and to create brilliant shotgun marriages that reward the rich banks and punish the poor.

BUT, I have no faith in Citigroup, which because of the moronic acquisitions and bizarre off-balance-sheet liabilities may technically be insolvent. When you consider it is too big to fail, you have to begin to wonder -- what's the plan if it can't make it? How far can forbearance go? Will we tolerate this bank being majority-owned by the sheiks or the communist Chinese? Seems far-fetched, but when I read Meredith Whitney's words this morning over at OPCO I know that the losses are going to be too big for the current base of capital.

MAJOR PAPERS:

• As chairman and CEO of Countrywide Financial Corporation (NYSE: CFC), Angelo Mozilo refused to take pay cuts, according to a report by a House committee, and reported by the Wall Street Journal. The focus of a meeting today with the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on executive compensation at companies involved in the subprime fiasco will be on Mozilo, who was paid about $250M between 1998 and 2007, plus $406M from his sale of Countrywide shares.
• The Wall Street Journal also reported that Corning Incorporated (NYSE: GLW) is looking to sell crystal business Steuben Glass, a unit that has lost $30M over the last five years. If Corning cannot find a buyer for the unit, executives said they will consider other options, including closing Steuben.

OTHER PAPERS:

• After failing to meet repayment requests, the UK Times reported that Carlyle Capital Corp Limited (OTC: CARYF), the Dutch-listed affiliate of U.S. private-equity firm Carlyle Group, held emergency restructuring talks with its banks Thursday evening. CCC disclosed that it had received one default notice after receiving margin calls for over $37M from banks since Wednesday but was "unable to meet the demands" of several. The firm expects "at least one" more default notice.

WEB SITES:

• Despite shedding several units, Vikram Pandit, Citigroup Incorporated's (NYSE: C) CEO, denied rumors that the bank could put its unit in South Korea up for sale. According to sources, Pandit, currently reviewing operations in an effort to boost earnings and cut costs, said "absolutely no" when directly asked about a divestiture, Reuters reported.

When Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) reports tomorrow, one big question on investors' minds will be how big a charge against its earnings it will take for its Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) and other Level 3 assets. The amount of the charge could range from $9 billion to $24 billion.

I appeared this morning on CNBC to discuss bank earnings with Charlie Gasparino and Andrew Ross Sorkin of the New York Times. I got into a bit of a disagreement with Gasparino, who reported earlier on the wide range of that charge. He thought that there was a strict amount for the charge. However, as I pointed out, Citigroup's Vikram Pandit wants to take a big bath write-down, but can only do so if he can raise enough capital to offset it. (Moreover, as I did not mention on the air, the very fact that Gasparino was discussing such a wide range of write-downs indicates how much management discretion is involved.)

I argued that since there is no active market for the Level 3 assets that Citigroup is writing down, there is significant management discretion in the amount of the charge. Management could base the write-down on the decline in the ABX, an index of subprime creditworthiness, or on the values that other institutions -- such as hedge fund Citadel -- have used, which range from 27 cents on the dollar to 45 cents.

Today's announcement that Citigroup (NYSE: C) will take $49 billion worth of Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) onto its balance sheet suggests to me that its new CEO is following a path I wrote about earlier this week -- the first step of which is to take a big bath write-down fast. I think Citi stock will fall further before hitting bottom -- say $15.

Why is Pandit doing this? First, investors give a new CEO a chance to put all his predecessor's mistakes in the past through a write-down -- which generally includes closing businesses and firing staff. Second, Pandit probably realized that the alternative -- a fire sale of securitized assets (the average net asset values of SIVs tumbled to 55% from 71% a month ago and 102% in June) -- would be the lesser of two evils.

Nevertheless -- Pandit's move came with pain attached. Bloomberg News reports that two hours after Citi's announcement, Moody's Corp. (NYSE: MCO) lowered its credit ratings to Aa3, the fourth-highest level, from Aa2, saying "capital ratios will remain low." Citi's capital ratio is likely to tumble far below its target -- causing it to take further capital preservation moves. Specifically, its Tier I capital ratio is likely to hit 6.8% by the end of this year from 7.32% on September 30 -- far short of its 7.5% target.

Expect more unpleasantness -- like a cash dividend cut -- as Citi stock continues to tumble. But I think if it hits $15, it may be worth considering an investment.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns Citigroup shares and has no financial interest in Moody's securities.

BusinessWeek reports that former Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) Chair Robert Rubin picked Vikram Pandit because Rubin thought Pandit could "drive the vision, drive the execution." I welcome a comment from anyone who can explain what that means. What comes to my mind is that Pandit is going to drive an execution squad behind him ready to gun down anyone who gets in his way.

I am not thrilled with Pandit's ascension and it looks like he is going to turn one of his weaknesses -- a lack of consumer banking expertise in a bank that gets half its income from that business -- into a strength. How so? Pandit looks poised to sell Citi's credit card business. I guess if Citi dumps all the consumer businesses, then he'll know something about the businesses that remain.

To increase the value of Citi's stock, I'd recommend three steps:

As expected, Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) today named Vikram Pandit as its new CEO, replacing the hugely unpopular Charles Prince. Acting CEO Win Bischoff replaced former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin as chairman. Rubin didn't want the job permanently.

As pundits including CNBC's Charles Gasparino pointed out, Citigroup's board didn't feel that Pandit had enough experience to get both jobs. That's no slight against Pandit, who joined New York-based Citigroup after selling the company his hedge fund for $900 million. Few if any people are experienced in the huge variety of business at Citigroup which is why Pandit says "simplifying the company's organizational structure and aligning our businesses and resources with appropriate goals and economic realities will be among our initial priorities."

So what does that mean?

Will Citigroup exit its retail business and focus on corporate banking? Are more job cuts coming down the pike? Investors are demanding quick answers to these and many other questions.

``They need somebody who can get in there and put some color on exactly where the risks are and what they're doing to address that,'' Johnson Asset Management analyst William Fitzpatrick, told Bloomberg News. ``The stock's been in freefall for the last couple of months.''

Shares of Citigroup, which are down 40% this year, fell further today with other financial stocks amid disappointment over the Fed's rate cut announcement

The New York Times reports that Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) is considering charisma as a test for its next CEO. And Vikram Pandit, the PhD in Finance and former professor, is thought to lack charisma -- thus lowering his attractiveness as a choice.

I have limited enthusiasm for Pandit because he has no experience managing a consumer bank, but I don't understand why charisma is a concern. Did Chuck Prince have charisma? If charisma is so important to Citigroup's board, why not hire George Clooney or Brad Pitt? Why not Angelina Jolie or Julia Roberts?

The fact that Citigroup is having so much trouble filling its CEO position tells me that the concept of Citigroup -- as it's currently organized -- is fraught with more peril than opportunity. The most capable potential candidates -- such as Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson who oversaw a great run at Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) -- must be put off by the black hole of unknown financial problems and the complexity of managing Citigroup's warring fiefdoms.

The suggestion that Citigroup is considering charisma in its decision makes me think it needs a board overhaul.

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns Citigroup shares and has no financial interest in Goldman Sachs.

Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) may name Vikram Pandit, the former Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) executive who sold his hedge fund to the New York-based financial services giant for $800 million in July, as the company's new CEO this week, according to various media reports.

The leak of Pandit's front-runner status is an interesting one. Clearly, the beleaguered Wall Street firm thinks that his appointment as CEO is going to be criticized by shareholders, so it decided to "get ahead of the story."

The problem, it seems, may be with former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, who became chairman after Chuck Prince was ousted. Rubin doesn't want the job permanently, which raises the question of whether Citigroup will ask him to stick around for a while if Pandit becomes CEO, whether it names a new chairman or whether it gives Pandit both jobs from the start, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Citigroup is in a pickle.

Shareholders abhor a leadership vacuum, but want the next CEO to be someone with whom they have absolute confidence. But if CItigroup doesn't give Pandit both jobs or a clear path toward both jobs, there is a good chance that he will be hired away by a rival firm.

This morning Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) CEO Chuck Prince declared that he would fire 73% more people than he had announced last month. If you ask me for the reason, I'd say so that he can finance a $600 million pay package for a new hire.

Citigroup's biggest problem is that its costs have been growing faster than its revenues, 23% and 15% respectively. The solution, announced last month, was to fire 15,000 people. But according to The New York Times today, Citigroup plans to bring that total to 8% of its workforce, or 26,000.

Meanwhile, Prince has reportedly been in talks to acquire a hedge fund, Old Lane, for $600 million. The idea is that former Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) executive Vikram Pandit, who runs Old Lane, would come along for the ride and join Citigroup as head of its Alternative Assets unit.

I am wondering whether Citigroup can find a less expensive way to hire talent -- maybe developing its own managers. In pre-market, Citigroup is up a mere 7 cents -- not much of a market reward for all that additional blood.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns shares of Citigroup and has no financial interest in Morgan Stanley.