<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment Q3 results exceed expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>)'s stock jumped Thursday after the market took a look at the company's <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/wweand-x00ae-reports-2009-third-quarter-results/rfid267813916?channel=pf">Q3 data</a>. Overall revenues didn't see much of an increase, but earnings per share rose over 70% to 12 cents. Driving this incredible growth rate was a cut in gross costs. Analysts were betting on 10 cents in per-share profit, according to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wwe">Earnings.com</a>. </p>
<p>Did WWE deserve a pop of 7% during yesterday's trading session? Some of the excitement was certainly justified. It's obviously a positive thing to see management acting so diligently when it comes to costs. Of course, there was an increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses during the quarter, so there is still room for improvement (the nine-month table did show a decrease in this line, to be fair). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment Q3 results exceed expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/">World Wrestling Entertainment Q3 results exceed expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/wweand-x00ae-reports-2009-third-quarter-results/rfid267813916?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19225495/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment should be just fine after management change]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" alt="" /> Linda McMahon, as I'm sure most investors are aware, is no longer the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). Her husband, Vincent K. McMahon, now occupies the role. The reason? Political ambitions. She wants to be a senator. Now, here's <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN1730963520090917?sp=true">the question</a>: should shareholders be worried about the change? </p>
<p>My opinion? Investors shouldn't worry at all. Well, perhaps that's overstating it a little, but I think there are a few things media observers should keep in mind. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment should be just fine after management change</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/">World Wrestling Entertainment should be just fine after management change</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN1730963520090917?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19169022/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>linda mcmahon</category><category>LindaMcmahon</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment's new media ambition ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" alt="" />There's some exciting news in the world of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). Looks like Vince McMahon wants to expand his media empire via entering the world of basic cable. Yes, he's already on basic cable, of course, but now he's intent on literally creating his very own wrestling channel.</p>
<p>According to a blog at the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/08/wwes-vince-mcmahon-wants-to-launch-cable-network.html"><em>Los Angeles Times</em> website</a>, McMahon would be interested in launching a dedicated WWE channel within two years. This makes complete sense on several levels. First, WWE has a lot of content in its library that needs to be monetized; WWE's existing video-on-demand product already leverages the company's portfolio, but exposure to ad-supported cable would be helpful. Second, it could boost the profile of the WWE brand. Third, it might help long-term growth; without question, WWE needs to do something to compensate for the falloff it is seen in pay-per-view buys. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment's new media ambition </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/">World Wrestling Entertainment's new media ambition </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/08/wwes-vince-mcmahon-wants-to-launch-cable-network.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19147493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>usa network</category><category>UsaNetwork</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Donald Trump help WWE's stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/can-donald-trump-help-wwes-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/can-donald-trump-help-wwes-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/can-donald-trump-help-wwes-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" alt="" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) is calling on an old friend to help it bring in an audience beyond the media company's hardcore demographic. Donald Trump, who has worked storylines with WWE before (remember the battle between Trump and Vince McMahon, the one that saw McMahon lose his hair?), recently appeared on WWE's <em>Raw</em> television program. In fact, <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2009/06/22/wwe-monday-night-raw-trumple-h/">TVSquad.com</a> discussed the high-profile promotion Trump's involvement received over this past weekend. TV Squad also covered the <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2009/06/19/wwe-needs-to-calm-down-the-sec-asap/">little controversy</a> caused by Trump's "purchase" of WWE's famous asset (I honestly cannot believe that some investors actually sold the company's stock based on a storyline).</p>
<span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/celebrity/Can_Donald_Trump_help_WWE_s_stock'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>
<p>Using Trump isn't a bad idea. He's a pretty good performer, and he seems, at times, like a natural for the wrestling business. How should an investor process his involvement, however? Does it show that WWE is having a hard time developing engaging angles with its own talent roster?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/can-donald-trump-help-wwes-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Donald Trump help WWE's stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/can-donald-trump-help-wwes-stock/">Can Donald Trump help WWE's stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.tvsquad.com/2009/06/22/wwe-monday-night-raw-trumple-h/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/can-donald-trump-help-wwes-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19074936/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/23/can-donald-trump-help-wwes-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>donald trump</category><category>DonaldTrump</category><category>inthenews</category><category>TV Squad</category><category>TvSquad</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></div>
<p>Last week, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) reported its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-reports-2009-first-quarter-results/rfid211295084">Q1 results</a>. Above all, investors interested in this business look at one thing: cash flow. Why? Take a look at WWE's dividend yield. </p>
<p>As of Tuesday's close, the stock was yielding almost 13%! That's high. And a high dividend yield often indicates that a dividend cut may be in the offing -- the theory being that if the yield were sustainable, then buyers would rush in, and their activities would eventually lower the yield by driving the price higher. </p>
<p>Well, WWE hasn't had a great time of it when it comes to cash flow. I found this out when I examined the company's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/">third quarter</a>. Net cash from operations, unfortunately, has been overpowered at times by the dividend obligation. In fact, according to the Q4 report (<a href="http://corporate.wwe.com/news/documents/PRESSRELEASEFINAL2-24-09.pdf">pdf file)</a>, operational cash flow for 2008 dropped significantly to roughly $36 million, and the dividend obligation was over $80 million. </p>
<p>And that was before capital investments. That's sort of like the Undertaker throwing Mankind off the top of a steel cage. In other words, it's not pretty, folks. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/">World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-reports-2009-first-quarter-results/rfid211295084>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://corporate.wwe.com/news/documents/PRESSRELEASEFINAL2-24-09.pdf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/thanks-for-nothing-disney/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1544385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>mankind</category><category>television</category><category>undertaker</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas"><img hspace="4" height="297" width="200" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/200px-monsters-vs-aliens-poster.jpg" />DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) has done it again. The studio's new computer cartoon, <em>Monsters Vs. Aliens</em>, which was distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), debuted in the top slot over the weekend at domestic multiplexes. According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo estimates</a> at the time of this writing, the film earned around $58 million. I think we all expected the performance in terms of rank, but I have to say that I thought the film would have taken in north of $60 million. <br /></p>
<p>If you look at this very useful <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=dwanimation.htm">reference</a>, you'll see that the opening for <em>Monsters</em> is relatively decent when compared to other DreamWorks Animation openings. But since both <em>Kung Fu Panda</em> and <em>Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa</em> had both hit the $60 million mark, I thought <em>Monsters</em> could do the same. An element to keep in mind is the timing. This is the first time that the studio opened one of its animated projects in March since <em>The Road to El Dorado</em>, and that one doesn't really count since it wasn't a CGI affair. So from that standpoint, perhaps this is a big victory.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/">'Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1502494/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12 rounds</category><category>12Rounds</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Cena</category><category>JohnCena</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>madagascar escape 2 africa</category><category>MadagascarEscape2Africa</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/wwe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Don't tell me you haven't noticed the rise in value of shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). The recent rally in the stock is supremely impressive. The shares closed on Thursday at $12.08. The 52-week low of $8.76 was made back in November of last year. If you look at a one-month chart, you'll see that it's been nothing but straight-up action. </p>
<p>Yes, my friends, the stock is Hulking up! (I love it when Hulk Hogan does that routine.) Of course, by the time this is published, maybe the shares will have experienced a sell-off, but for now, the shares are hot.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/">World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1499787/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12 rounds</category><category>12Rounds</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Hulk Hogan</category><category>HulkHogan</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Cena</category><category>JohnCena</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>See No Evil</category><category>SeeNoEvil</category><category>stone cold steve austin</category><category>StoneColdSteveAustin</category><category>the condemned</category><category>TheCondemned</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment fourth-quarter profit falls, matches expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/world-wrestling-entertainment-fourth-quarter-profit-falls-match/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/world-wrestling-entertainment-fourth-quarter-profit-falls-match/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/world-wrestling-entertainment-fourth-quarter-profit-falls-match/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" alt="" />While the product may be fake, <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment's</a> (NYSE: <a href="javascript:void(0);/*1235506866995*/">WWE</a>) fourth-quarter loss was all to real. The athletic-entertainment company saw fourth-quarter profit fall 37%, matching analysts expectations with its earnings of 18 cents per share. A year ago, Vince McMahon's company raked in 30 cents per share. For the full year, WWE made 62 cents per share, down from 72 cents per share in 2007.<br /><br />Quarterly revenue fell 5% to $125.4 million from $132.6 million a year earlier. Revenue took the largest hit from a fall in live and televised entertainment revenue. The Street expected WWE to pull in revenue of $125.9 million. Full-year revenue rose to $526.5 million.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/world-wrestling-entertainment-fourth-quarter-profit-falls-match/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment fourth-quarter profit falls, matches expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/world-wrestling-entertainment-fourth-quarter-profit-falls-match/">World Wrestling Entertainment fourth-quarter profit falls, matches expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/world-wrestling-entertainment-fourth-quarter-profit-falls-match/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1470421/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/world-wrestling-entertainment-fourth-quarter-profit-falls-match/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>wrestling</category><category>wwe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment: Long-term play for dividend fans?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nct/" rel="tag">Newcastle Investment (NCT)</a></p><p>I was sent a press release today concerning <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). It was one that I had missed. WWE, as many may know, has a pretty high dividend yield. Problem is, in this trading environment, some high dividend yields have proven to be predictors of disaster. As an example, were you trading <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newcastle-investment-corporation/nct/nys">Newcastle Investment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newcastle-investment-corporation/nct/nys">NCT</a>) by any chance? Then you know what I mean. For many stocks, high yields are merely a ticket to Dividend-Cut City. Or how about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/">General Electric Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/">GE</a>)? That company didn't cut its dividend, but management indicates that there won't be a raise in the dividend this year. It's been many, many years since GE refused to raise its quarterly payout. In many sad ways, it could be considered a cut. </p>
<p>Yet, here's something <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-maintains-high-dividend-yield/rfid144729091?channel=%22pf%22">encouraging</a> for investors in WWE. Management at the world's most famous wrestling institution has come out swinging, eager to alleviate the fears of shaken investors in a world bloodied and bruised by the financial crisis (hey, maybe that could be a new wrestling character, Financial Crisis, and his finishing move could be the Mark-to-Market). According to the press release, WWE intends on keeping its current quarterly payout for the long term. The very high yield of 9%, as far as execs are concerned, is doable. </p>
<p>What are income investors to make of this? Well, in my opinion, long-term investors might do well with WWE stock. Consider that we are not dealing with a financial company. Like GE, WWE didn't say it intends to raise the payout. But WWE has increased the dividend quite a bit since it first initiated the shareholder-friendly initiative. In this environment, the ability to keep a high yield is something that could be valuable. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment: Long-term play for dividend fans?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/">World Wrestling Entertainment: Long-term play for dividend fans?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1330110/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Linda McMahon</category><category>LindaMcmahon</category><category>NCT</category><category>Newcastle Investment</category><category>NewcastleInvestment</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WWE needs to make Vince McMahon's giveaway more exciting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p>I recently wrote about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) million-dollar <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/">giveaway plans</a>. This is the scheme that sees the Mr. McMahon character reward viewers who register at the company's website with portions of his fortune. He calls them up on the phone during WWE's <em>RAW </em>program and doles out various sums; according to this <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-fans-win-rawr-money-on-usa-networks/rfid111052037">press release</a>, one winner got $200,000, while another player received $125,000. One poor hapless soul won $2! Remember, Mr. McMahon is an evil guy. </p>
<p>I tuned in to see how the contest would be presented and to get some sense of how it was received. It seemed a bit awkward and slow at times. A few in the audience screamed that they were bored. Personally, I thought it was goofy fun to see Vince McMahon calling people to hand out some of his money and enjoyed it for what it was. But WWE will need to optimize the segment and try to make it more exciting, as I don't think it came off exactly as it wanted. McMahon is supposed to keep handing out $1 million a week for an unspecified time period, so the company will have more chances to improve the presentation. </p>
<p>WWE wants to really juice the ratings for the <em>RAW </em>brand, hoping that viewers beyond the hardcore fan base will stop watching networks owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) long enough to sample the spectacle of the WWE product (of course, GE's NBC Universal owns the USA cable network, which <em>RAW</em> runs on). McMahon is smart to be trying something like this since WWE will be working its way up to perhaps one of its biggest pay-per-view opportunities ever: Wrestlemania 25. With a milestone like that coming, the company has a chance of really expanding its brand equity and setting the stage for long-term growth. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>WWE needs to make Vince McMahon's giveaway more exciting</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/">WWE needs to make Vince McMahon's giveaway more exciting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-fans-win-rawr-money-on-usa-networks/rfid111052037>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226230/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monday night raw</category><category>MondayNightRaw</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>Wrestlemania</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Vince McMahon bribing viewers to watch wrestling?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/wwelogo.jpg" />World Wrestling Entertainment</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) Vincent Kennedy McMahon wants more viewers for his <em>Monday Night Raw </em>wrestling extravaganza. In fact, he's so keen on growing ratings that he's willing to spend his own money to keep viewers tuned. How much? Try $1 million. </p>
<p>In a terse <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/mcmahons-million-dollar-maniatm/rfid109479367">press release</a> concerning a promotional sweepstakes, WWE says that <em>Raw </em>viewers can register at the company's Web site and then watch for codes during the program beginning next Monday. People will be competing to win a portion of a $1 million giveaway each week for some unspecified time period. Now, before you think me naive, I made sure to see if this was legitimate, and from the looks of things it is. According to this <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5indhctjJFAtfOVHroIOX_lG5-_GwD912E9D00">AP article</a>, McMahon will really be doing this. According to other reports, the June 9<em> Raw</em> will reveal the details of the promotion. The $1 million will come from McMahon's own fortune (again, from what I understand, this is real). </p>
<p>There's no question as to why this is being done. WWE wants eyeballs. Ratings have been challenged as of late, according to that AP piece. I think giving away $1 million is exciting, and as far as a marketing campaign goes, it should boost ratings. Only problem is, I'd have to imagine that long-term shareholders aren't happy that this kind of gimmick has to be employed. Is wrestling becoming boring to people? Are they in need of other reasons to watch? Well, the answer would seem to be a resounding "yes." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Vince McMahon bribing viewers to watch wrestling?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/">Is Vince McMahon bribing viewers to watch wrestling?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/mcmahons-million-dollar-maniatm/rfid109479367>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1216014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>Monday Night Raw</category><category>MondayNightRaw</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment shows growth in earnings, but what about cash flow?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg"  alt="" />World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) stepped into the Wall Street ring on Tuesday -- and lost. The company's stock dropped about 8% at closing on the Q1 <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-reports-2008-first-quarter-results/rfid100311407">earnings release</a> (it did recover a bit during the after-hours session). I'd probably call this profit-taking, although there was one thing about the earnings report that I didn't like: free cash flow. <br /></p>
<p><br />Let me say first, though, that revenues increased more than 50% to $162.6 million, and that earnings per share rose almost 29% to 27 cents (according to Briefing.com, this matched expectations). This is excellent growth, and it shows the resilience of wrestling as an entertainment brand; sure, many on Wall Street may not take the company seriously, but they're wrong. I enjoyed, by the way, that WWE increased the buy-rates for its <em>Royal Rumble </em>and <em>No Way Out </em>pay-per-view events. Pay-per-view is a very vital part of WWE's operations, in my opinion. And let's not forget a big driver for the quarter -- <em>Wrestlemania XXIV --</em> which brought in more than million buys. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, free cash tumbled off the mat, decreasing 77%. And, no, the amount generated did not cover the generous dividend that WWE pays. I would really like to see free cash flow do well every quarter since WWE has been a steady dividend-increaser over its time as a public company. Management must focus on the cash-flow statement and make it a priority. <br /></p>
<p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment shows growth in earnings, but what about cash flow?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/">World Wrestling Entertainment shows growth in earnings, but what about cash flow?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 May 2008 10:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-reports-2008-first-quarter-results/rfid100311407>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1188128/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>Wrestlemania</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WWE gives analysts a leg drop]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/wwe-gives-analysts-a-leg-drop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/wwe-gives-analysts-a-leg-drop/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/wwe-gives-analysts-a-leg-drop/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WWE</a>) reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/wwer-reports-2007-fourth-quarter-results/n20080212083409990052">Q4 earnings</a> today, and they showed that this little media company isn't ready to submit yet. WWE generated $0.30 per share in net income, which represented growth of 36%. According to earnings.com, the street was figuring on $0.17 per share. Guess the street had better learn not to doubt Vincent Kennedy McMahon.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, all is not necessarily well with WWE. For one thing, the company has found that playing in the movie business is not as easy as it sounds. The WWE Films unit saw revenues of $3.1 million in the quarter but contributed nothing in terms of profit. WWE is recognizing revenues from films <em>See No Evil </em>-- which was distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lions Gate</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LGF</a>) in the summer of 2006 -- and <em>The Marine</em>, which was released by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) Fox in the fall of 2006. Also, the pay-per-view buy rates could use some help, maybe some marketing muscle to get things back on track.</p>
<p>Still, free cash flow for the year saw a body-slamming jump to $79.6 million versus $26.2 million for 2006. That was enough to cover the dividend obligation -- and WWE actually pays a decent yield. Shares are up as I write this over 7%, and the volume is Hulkin' up as well. So, investors are clearly pleased. But, Mr. McMahon really better take a good, hard look at his film business and get some exciting projects into production -- I believe there is great potential for this segment over the long haul. Sure, the company isn't a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>), but it still is a fun way to play the media sector. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I own shares in Disney.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/wwe-gives-analysts-a-leg-drop/">WWE gives analysts a leg drop</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/wwe-gives-analysts-a-leg-drop/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1113229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/12/wwe-gives-analysts-a-leg-drop/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>See No Evil</category><category>SeeNoEvil</category><category>The Marine</category><category>TheMarine</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WWE won't be pinned down forever]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/wwe-wont-be-pinned-down-forever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/wwe-wont-be-pinned-down-forever/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/wwe-wont-be-pinned-down-forever/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bargain-stocks/" rel="tag">Bargain Stocks</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) shares have plunged more than 5% over the past month as investors fled Vince McMahon's muscle-bound empire in the wake of the Chris Benoit tragedy. The stock is headed for an even bigger fall in the coming months as the company grapples with congressional scrutiny, potential lawsuits and long-overdue increased government regulation.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, WWE is something that truly adventurous investors should consider. The shares are trading at a multiple of 25, which is dirt cheap compared with its peers such as<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys"> Playboy Enterprises Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>)'s 130 and<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys"> Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lions-gate-entertainment-corp/lgf/nys">LGF</a>)'s 53. Though profit and sales are expected to fall this year, analysts expect WWE to rebound next year. </p>
<p>When WWE holds its earnings conference call on August 2, there no doubt will be plenty of questions about Benoit, steroids, declining ratings and potential share buybacks. WWE management should also be scolded for its stupid decision to air a tribute to Benoit.</p>
<p> But some long term perspective also is in order. Big media companies including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">Viacom Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-cl-a/via/nys">VIA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) would love to buy WWE to gain access to its huge library of content and rabid fan base. </p>
<p>Like it or not wrestling has been part of the pop culture landscape for a long time. Eventually, some other personality will come along that will make people forget the Benoit murders. </p>
<p>At that point, investors who hung in there will have their patience rewarded.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/wwe-wont-be-pinned-down-forever/">WWE won't be pinned down forever</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/wwe-wont-be-pinned-down-forever/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/943032/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/19/wwe-wont-be-pinned-down-forever/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benoit murders</category><category>BenoitMurders</category><category>cheap stocks</category><category>CheapStocks</category><category>chris benoit</category><category>Chris Benoit impact</category><category>ChrisBenoit</category><category>ChrisBenoitImpact</category><category>lgf</category><category>lions gate</category><category>LionsGate</category><category>nws</category><category>pla</category><category>playboy enterprises</category><category>PlayboyEnterprises</category><category>pro wrestling</category><category>professional wrestling</category><category>ProfessionalWrestling</category><category>ProWrestling</category><category>via</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>wrestling</category><category>wwe</category><category>WWE stock</category><category>WweStock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is it time for WWE to change management?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/is-it-time-for-wwe-to-change-management/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/is-it-time-for-wwe-to-change-management/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/is-it-time-for-wwe-to-change-management/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/benoit.gif" alt="" />Two weeks ago, Vince McMahon, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) CEO, <a href="http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_21288312.shtml">faked his own death</a>. This week, Chris Benoit killed his wife and mentally retarded 7-year-old son. I think it may be time for a change at the top of WWE.</p>
<p>In response to an earlier <a href="http://hot.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/benoits-murder-suicide-belts-world-wrestling-entertainment/">post</a>, I discussed this yesterday with CNBC. A risk noted in WWE's financial statements is that if CEO Vince McMahon left, it could hurt the company. And since McMahon faked his death, the stock has lost 11% of its value. I realize that these kinds of stunts are part of the entertainment. But as an investor, I would be concerned that WWE lacks the depth of management to replace McMahon.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, speculation continues as to what drove Benoit. Here are three possibilities:</p>
<ul>
    <li>His wife has filed for divorce from him in 2003 citing <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-wrestlerjun28,1,852361.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed">"cruel treatment"</a> and tensions continued </li>
    <li>He was stressed by his <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-wrestlerjun28,1,852361.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed">wife's demands to spend more time at home taking care of their son</a> </li>
    <li>Steroids were found at the scene which are known to cause paranoia and rage.<br /> </li>
</ul>
<p>It's too early to tell what happened with Benoit. But in the absence of a deeper management bench, the best thing preserving WWE's future is the possibility that a bigger media outlet might acquire it.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in WWE.</em></p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end --><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/is-it-time-for-wwe-to-change-management/">Is it time for WWE to change management?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/is-it-time-for-wwe-to-change-management/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/928504/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/is-it-time-for-wwe-to-change-management/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chris Benoit</category><category>ChrisBenoit</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>wrestling</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cramer sweet on Vince McMahon of WWE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/cramer-sweet-on-vince-mcmahon-of-wwe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/cramer-sweet-on-vince-mcmahon-of-wwe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/cramer-sweet-on-vince-mcmahon-of-wwe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a></p>Awww, dawg, it's straight-up whack! Wall Street has just totally "dissed" the company. Wait, is this the stocks blog? Sorry. I just got carried away with Jim Cramer's latest rant. He's discussing World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. (NYSE: WWE), a stock was down for a while. Yet its yield is over 5%. <br /><br />Cramer interviewed chairman and "third-generation promoter" <a href="http://corporate.wwe.com/investors/bios/vk_mcmahon.jsp">Vince McMahon</a> on video conference. Cramer asked about WWE's international prospects, and McMahon said that his company's entertainment may be the biggest US export. McMahon said national attendance was actually down at events but the international audience more than makes up for it. Cramer asked McMahon about two movies, McMahon said they have some downside protection and they keep their own intellectual products. He said Spain, Italy, Portugal, Philippines are all growing after recent launches. Cramer said that the future seems brighter than the past and Cramer thinks the dead-money past performance is about to change. He said you should even do a "Mo'm-Back" and buy it before this changes.<br /><br />Oddly enough, Cramer didn't ask any guidance questions or real financial questions. Maybe that, too, would be whack. WWE traded up 3.2% today, so we'll have to see how it performs on Friday.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/cramer-sweet-on-vince-mcmahon-of-wwe/">Cramer sweet on Vince McMahon of WWE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:49:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/cramer-sweet-on-vince-mcmahon-of-wwe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/687887/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/19/cramer-sweet-on-vince-mcmahon-of-wwe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cramer</category><category>italy</category><category>jim cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>mcmahon</category><category>momback</category><category>portugal</category><category>spain</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>wrestling</category><category>wwe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:49:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
