<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[WD-40's Q2 results didn't impress me]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/wd-40s-q2-results-didnt-impress-me/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/wd-40s-q2-results-didnt-impress-me/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/wd-40s-q2-results-didnt-impress-me/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/clx/" rel="tag">Clorox Co (CLX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cl/" rel="tag">Colgate-Palmolive (CL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wd-40-company/wdfc/nas">WD-40</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wd-40-company/wdfc/nas">WDFC</a>) issued its Q2 <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wd-40-company-reports-second-quarter/rfid90784085">earnings report</a> yesterday after the close of the market trading session -- and it wasn't full of great news. The top line was essentially flat as net sales dipped 0.5% to almost $79 million. Earnings came in at $0.51 per diluted share versus $0.52 per diluted share in the year-ago time frame. </p>
<p>Another negative aspect to the report was the statement of cash flows. WD-40 took in a lot less in terms of net cash from operations this time around, as changes in working capital and other items affected the flow. There's also a lot less cash on the balance sheet. And, sorry to say shareholders, but WD-40 missed analyst expectations by the proverbial penny. Investors shouldn't always be concerned with Wall Street expectations, but here's something that shareholders will be concerned with: the company lowered its earnings outlook. Management says that revenue growth will probably be somewhere between 4% and 8% as opposed to the originally expected range of between 7% and 10% -- any hopes for double-digit appreciation are now history. Net income per share is now expected to fall in a range between $1.80 and $1.90 versus a previous range of $1.83 and $1.93.</p>
<p>Well, now, what do we make of all this? It was a disappointing report, no question. But WD-40 has some decent brands in its portfolio, including the flagship lubricant, although its brand collection isn't necessarily on par with others, such as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/colgate-palmolive-company/cl/nys">Colgate-Palmolive</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/colgate-palmolive-company/cl/nys">CL</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-clorox-company/clx/nys">Clorox</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-clorox-company/clx/nys">CLX</a>). WD-40 isn't the current best play in the consumer-goods department at the moment, in my humble opinion. Some will point out that the stock's yield is attractive right now at 3%, but its dividend history isn't as good as others in terms of quarterly hikes. I'm not very bullish on WD-40; maybe I will be at a later date. </p>
<p><em>Disclosure: I don't own shares in any of the companies mentioned; positions can change at any time.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/wd-40s-q2-results-didnt-impress-me/">WD-40's Q2 results didn't impress me</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/wd-40s-q2-results-didnt-impress-me/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1163204/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/10/wd-40s-q2-results-didnt-impress-me/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cl</category><category>Clorox</category><category>clx</category><category>colgate-palmolive</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pg</category><category>procter gamble</category><category>ProcterGamble</category><category>WD40</category><category>WDFC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:28:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
