<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[CVS Stocks More Food That Could Add More Beef to Our Upside]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/16/cvs-stocks-more-food-that-could-add-more-beef-to-our-upside/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/16/cvs-stocks-more-food-that-could-add-more-beef-to-our-upside/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/16/cvs-stocks-more-food-that-could-add-more-beef-to-our-upside/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/cvs-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />If we told you that the largest pharmacies chains in the U.S., CVS Caremark (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) and Walgreens (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), planned to sell more groceries and produce, would you believe us? If so, you would be right. CVS Caremark <a href="http://www.csnews.com/top-story-competitive_watch__cvs_expanding_grocery_aisles-57150.html">plans to double the size</a> of its food section and revamp about 20% of its 7,000 stores to better cater to groceries and quick check outs, and Walgreens started to satiate its appetite for the nation's trillion-dollar food budget by<a href="http://walmarthelp.com/stores-like-target-and-cvs-add-groceries-to-attract-shoppers/"> announcing</a> last year that it would add up to 500 food items including salads, sandwiches, frozen meats, soups, juices, yogurts and even sushi to its offering.</p>
<p><strong><em>How Do Consumers Benefit?</em></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/16/cvs-stocks-more-food-that-could-add-more-beef-to-our-upside/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CVS Stocks More Food That Could Add More Beef to Our Upside</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/16/cvs-stocks-more-food-that-could-add-more-beef-to-our-upside/">CVS Stocks More Food That Could Add More Beef to Our Upside</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/16/cvs-stocks-more-food-that-could-add-more-beef-to-our-upside/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19845324/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/16/cvs-stocks-more-food-that-could-add-more-beef-to-our-upside/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cvs</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>CvsCaremark</category><category>intehnews</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trefis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen: Slightly Overbought, Short-term]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/walgreen-slightly-overbought-short-term/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/walgreen-slightly-overbought-short-term/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/walgreen-slightly-overbought-short-term/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/wag-logo.jpg"  alt="" />Walgreen Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), first written about here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/walgreen-wag-expands-the-old-fashioned-way-carefully/">on February 17, 2009</a> at a price of $25.46, has powered higher, clearing $40 resistance, and if you're in at/near $25, now may be a good time to consider taking some profits.<br />
<br />
Drug store chain giant Walgreen's revenue should rise about 3-5% in FY2011, boosted by the addition of about 300 net new store openings. The front-store traffic trend in this more than 8,000-store chain is being hurt by a slower-than-expected U.S. economic recovery, and back-store (pharmacy) margins are not rising as fast as expected, due to a slower roll-out of higher-margin generic drugs. <br />
<br />
Even so, Walgreen locates many of its stores in high-traffic spots, which means WAG is well-positioned when the U.S. economy starts to add jobs in a sustained way, and traffic improves.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/walgreen-slightly-overbought-short-term/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen: Slightly Overbought, Short-term</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/walgreen-slightly-overbought-short-term/">Walgreen: Slightly Overbought, Short-term</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/walgreen-slightly-overbought-short-term/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19809201/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/20/walgreen-slightly-overbought-short-term/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>pharmacy</category><category>pharmacy stocks</category><category>retail</category><category>walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen Near 52-Week High After Q1 Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/wag-logo.jpg" alt="Walgreen (WAG) logo" />Walgreen (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) is having a merry Christmas. The stock closed on Thursday at $39.19. The 52-week high for the shares is $40.20. Pretty cool for those who own this name. Something even cooler: the drugstore chain issued a solid fiscal first-quarter report earlier in the week.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/walgreen-co-reports-26-5-percent-increase-in-diluted-earnings-per-share-to-a-record-62-cents-for-the-first-quarter-2011/rfid398348925/?channel=pf">press release</a> begins with three bragging bullet points: the top line gained 6% and came in at $17.3 billion; <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Gross%20Margin">gross margin</a> expanded by 80 basis points; <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Operating%20Cash%20Flow%20-%20OCF">operating cash flow</a> was $1.2 billion. Nice, but in terms of the latter point, it should be noted that cash from operations was essentially flat compared to last year's number. That's okay, though, it's still respectable.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen Near 52-Week High After Q1 Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/">Walgreen Near 52-Week High After Q1 Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19775951/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/24/walgreen-near-52-week-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>DrugStore</category><category>inthenews</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreen earnings</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen Earnings Preview]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/walgreen-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/walgreen-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/walgreen-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/09/wag-logo.jpg" alt="Walgreen (WAG) logo" />Walgreen Co. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), which recently began carrying <a href="http://dinersjournal.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/23/walgreens-gets-fresh/">fresh fruit and vegetables</a> in some of its stores, is scheduled to discuss its fourth-quarter fiscal 2010 financial results Tuesday, September 28, in a <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Conference%20Call" class="inlinked">conference call</a> beginning at 8:30 AM (ET). You can catch a <a href="http://investor.walgreens.com/#">live webcast</a> of the call at the company's website.</p>
<p>During the three months that ended in August, Deerefield, Ill.-based Walgreen launched a <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/walgreens-launches-new-social-responsibility-website/rfid355095545/?channel=pf">social responsibility website</a> and <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/walgreens-increases-quarterly-dividend-27-3-percent/rfid348070752/?channel=pf">boosted its dividend</a>. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters are looking for the drugstore chain operator to report that its earnings for that period were about the same as a year ago, or 44 cents per share. Revenue is expected to total $16.8 billion, which is a 7.3% increase from the same period of last year. And for the full year, analysts forecast <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Earnings%20Per%20Share,EPS" class="inlinked">EPS</a> of $2.12 (+4.7%) on revenue of $67.4 billion (+6.4%).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/walgreen-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen Earnings Preview</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/walgreen-earnings-preview/">Walgreen Earnings Preview</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/walgreen-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19648961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/walgreen-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst forecasts</category><category>CVS</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>inthenews</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreen earnings</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Top Investing Mistake After Health Care Reform]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/the-top-investing-mistake-after-health-care-reform/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/the-top-investing-mistake-after-health-care-reform/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/the-top-investing-mistake-after-health-care-reform/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/healthcosts.jpg"  alt="" />Now that health care reform is a done deal, with the ink from President Obama's signature yesterday still drying, it's time to talk about how to profit from the new legislation.</p>
<p>I know many parts of the legislation may not sit well with some of you -- whether it be <a href="http://www.investorplace.com/experts/jim_woods/dividend-tax-healthcare-reform-medicare.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=investorplace">the taxes on dividends used to pay for reforms</a> or the general idea of Uncle Sam getting deeper into entitlement spending even as businesses are generally reducing their debt loads. But what's done is done and there's no use grousing about it. As investors, it's not our job to judge how good or bad the news is but only to judge how to cash in.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/the-top-investing-mistake-after-health-care-reform/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Top Investing Mistake After Health Care Reform</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/the-top-investing-mistake-after-health-care-reform/">The Top Investing Mistake After Health Care Reform</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/the-top-investing-mistake-after-health-care-reform/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19413063/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/24/the-top-investing-mistake-after-health-care-reform/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Express Scripts</category><category>ExpressScripts</category><category>featured</category><category>health care reform</category><category>Louis Navellier</category><category>LouisNavellier</category><category>pharmacy stocks</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis Navellier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen (WAG) Buying Duane Reade]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/walgreen-wag-buying-duane-reade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/walgreen-wag-buying-duane-reade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/walgreen-wag-buying-duane-reade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/walgreens-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Walgreen Co. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys" target="_blank">WAG</a>) announced plans this morning to <a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=37123&amp;ba=1" target="_blank">take over</a> privately-held drugstore chain Duane Reade Holdings for $1.075 billion in cash. Under the deal, WAG will acquire 257 locations, all of which are based in the New York metro area. These stores will continue to operate under the Duane Reade brand after the transaction is finalized. <br />
<br />
Duane Reade isn't huge, but it's powerful. According to a release from the Walgreens camp, the chain has the highest sales per square feet among U.S. drugstores. In the 12 months ended December 26, Duane Reade's unaudited sales came in at $1.8 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/walgreen-wag-buying-duane-reade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen (WAG) Buying Duane Reade</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/walgreen-wag-buying-duane-reade/">Walgreen (WAG) Buying Duane Reade</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=37123&amp;ba=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/walgreen-wag-buying-duane-reade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19361648/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/17/walgreen-wag-buying-duane-reade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Duane Reade</category><category>DuaneReade</category><category>inthenews</category><category>WAG</category><category>walgreen</category><category>walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen's December Sales Were Slow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/walgreens-december-sales-slow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/walgreens-december-sales-slow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/walgreens-december-sales-slow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a href="http://investor.walgreens.com/" target="_blank"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="WAG logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/wag-logo.jpg" /></a>Walgreen's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a> - <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) stock is trading lower today after the company said its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/ap/walgreen-says-key-sales-reading-fell-in-december/rfid286491224?channel=pf">same-store sales fell 0.3 percent last month</a>, the first monthly sales decline since February. According to the company, this dip in sales is due to WAG stocking fewer seasonal items, which is better than the alternative of shoppers just not buying anything. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on WAG.<br /><br />This morning, WAG opened at $36.16. So far today the stock has hit a high of $37.29 and a low of $35.92. As of 12:00, WAG is trading at $36.84, down 16 cents(-0.5%). The chart for WAG looks neutral and <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline" target="_blank">S&amp;P</a> gives WAG a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/walgreens-december-sales-slow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen's December Sales Were Slow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/walgreens-december-sales-slow/">Walgreen's December Sales Were Slow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/walgreens-december-sales-slow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19305342/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/walgreens-december-sales-slow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>investors observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>sales</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CVS, Walgreen: Pull-Backs Are Buy Opportunities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/walgreens-logo-240.jpg" />I'm reiterating my buy ratings the nation's two premier drug store chains: CVS Caremark (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>), first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/16/cvs-knows-that-a-doctors-handwriting-is-a-code-for-earnings/">on February 16, 2009</a>, at a price of $27.30; and Walgreen (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), first recommended <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/17/walgreen-wag-expands-the-old-fashioned-way-carefully/">on February 17, 2009</a>, at a price of $25.46. If you bought CVS in February, you're up 25%; WAG, up about 40%.</p>
<p>As expected, each has performed well on increased store traffic stemming from the H1N1 flu virus (trips to purchase hand sanitizers, other disinfecting items, and flu symptom comforts), which has offset reduced traffic for other drug store trips, due to the U.S. recession.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CVS, Walgreen: Pull-Backs Are Buy Opportunities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/">CVS, Walgreen: Pull-Backs Are Buy Opportunities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19301113/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/04/cvs-walgreen-pull-backs-are-buy-opportunities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>H1N1</category><category>health care</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumers sick of recession, may spend extra on holidays]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/26/consumers-sick-of-recession-may-spend-extra-on-holidays/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/26/consumers-sick-of-recession-may-spend-extra-on-holidays/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/26/consumers-sick-of-recession-may-spend-extra-on-holidays/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gps/" rel="tag">Gap Inc (GPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rsh/" rel="tag">RadioShack Corp (RSH)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/10/christmas-spending-200.jpg" />If consumers try a little harder this year, the holiday season has a shot of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5AP0M420091126" target="_blank">hiding memories of last year's nightmare for retailers</a>. The retailers are doing their part, with Walmart (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys" target="_blank">WMT</a>), Gap (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gap-inc-del/gps/nys" target="_blank">GPS</a>), RadioShack (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/radioshack-corporation/rsh/nys" target="_blank">RSH</a>), Walgreens (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys" target="_blank">WAG</a>) and many others opening their doors Thanksgiving Day, giving shoppers the opportunity to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/25/retailers-cant-wait-for-black-friday-open-thursday/" target="_blank">start their spending early</a>. There's a chance that consumers will spend a bit more this year to thank each other for keeping their belts so tight for so long.</p>
<p>Forecasts of the season's ultimate result remain difficult to pin down. Some expect a year-over-year decline of 3%, and predictions range to an increase of 2%. Credit is harder to come by, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/22/the-economy-turns-the-corner-consumer-spending-likely-up-slight/" target="_blank">unemployment remains over 10%</a> and at a 26-year high. But, the pressures on spending are offset by pent-up emotion and a stabilizing financial environment -- even if it isn't getting better yet, it doesn't seem to be getting worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/26/consumers-sick-of-recession-may-spend-extra-on-holidays/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumers sick of recession, may spend extra on holidays</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/26/consumers-sick-of-recession-may-spend-extra-on-holidays/">Consumers sick of recession, may spend extra on holidays</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/26/consumers-sick-of-recession-may-spend-extra-on-holidays/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19255277/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/26/consumers-sick-of-recession-may-spend-extra-on-holidays/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Black Friday 2009</category><category>christmas shopping</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu</category><category>featured</category><category>gap</category><category>GPS</category><category>holiday shopping</category><category>inthenews</category><category>npd group</category><category>RadioShack</category><category>retail sales</category><category>retail sector</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>rsh</category><category>shopping</category><category>thanksgiving</category><category>wag</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>walgreens</category><category>walmart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wal-Mart shares are dead money -- so where is it headed?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wal-mart-shares-are-dead-money-so-where-is-it-headed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wal-mart-shares-are-dead-money-so-where-is-it-headed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wal-mart-shares-are-dead-money-so-where-is-it-headed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/wmt.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) wants to sell you everything it possibly can. Need funeral arrangements? The world's largest retailer <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/wal-marts-latest-money-making-scheme-death/">wants to help</a>. $4 prescription drugs? It has you covered. In fact, it's hard to think of any product category that Wal-Mart does not seem at least a little covered with. For good reason, too: Wal-Mart has tapped out much of the short-term growth by virtue of it being almost everywhere in the U.S. and selling everything you can possibly think of.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wal-mart-shares-are-dead-money-so-where-is-it-headed/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wal-Mart shares are dead money -- so where is it headed?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wal-mart-shares-are-dead-money-so-where-is-it-headed/">Wal-Mart shares are dead money -- so where is it headed?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestar.com/business/article/719306--wal-mart-s-grave-situation?bn=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wal-mart-shares-are-dead-money-so-where-is-it-headed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19218714/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wal-mart-shares-are-dead-money-so-where-is-it-headed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Best Buy</category><category>BestBuy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Target</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Wal-Mart competition</category><category>Wal-Mart Stores</category><category>Walgreens</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreens (WAG) September sales grow by 10%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/walgreens-wag-september-sales-grow-by-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/walgreens-wag-september-sales-grow-by-10/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/walgreens-wag-september-sales-grow-by-10/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://investor.walgreens.com/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="WAG logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/wag-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today after <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/walgreens-september-sales-increase-10-3-percent/rfid256988079?channel=pf">the company announced its September sales rose 10.3%</a> higher than the same period last year. Same-store-sales were up 5.3%, buoyed by pharmacy increases of 7%, while other merchandise saw just a 2% gain. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on WAG.<br /><br />WAG opened this morning at $38.35. So far today the stock has hit a low of $37.92 and a new 52-week high of $38.75. As of 11:45, WAG is trading at $38.21 up 2 cents (0.05%). The chart for WAG looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives WAG a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/walgreens-wag-september-sales-grow-by-10/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreens (WAG) September sales grow by 10%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/walgreens-wag-september-sales-grow-by-10/">Walgreens (WAG) September sales grow by 10%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/walgreens-wag-september-sales-grow-by-10/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19182429/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/walgreens-wag-september-sales-grow-by-10/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>same store sales</category><category>SameStoreSales</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreens (WAG) soars on Q2 earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/walgreens-wag-soars-on-q2-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/walgreens-wag-soars-on-q2-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/walgreens-wag-soars-on-q2-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://investor.walgreens.com/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="WAG logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/wag-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are headed higher today after the company posted a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsnews/idINN2351476920090323?rpc=33">second-quarter profit of $640 million</a>, or 65 cents per share. WAG's adjusted profit of 69 cents per share beat analysts' estimates of 66 cents per share. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on WAG.<br /><br />UPS opened this morning at $42.70. So far today the stock has hit a low of $42.40 and a high of $45.57. As of 12:40, UPS is trading at $44.69, up $2.27 (5.3%). The chart for WAG looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http:// www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives WAG a 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/walgreens-wag-soars-on-q2-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreens (WAG) soars on Q2 earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/walgreens-wag-soars-on-q2-earnings/">Walgreens (WAG) soars on Q2 earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/walgreens-wag-soars-on-q2-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1495768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/walgreens-wag-soars-on-q2-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen's (WAG) posts strong December sales]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/walgreens-wag-posts-strong-december-sales/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/walgreens-wag-posts-strong-december-sales/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/walgreens-wag-posts-strong-december-sales/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://investor.walgreens.com/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="WAG logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walgreens-wag-logo.jpg" /></a><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co.</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a> - <a href="http:// http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares have moved higher today after <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/ap/_a/walgreen-says-december-sales-grew-108/rfid172540350">the company reported December sales that rose upwards of 10%</a>, including a 4.9% gain in same store sales. In times like these, WAG stayed strong with sales of basic necessities, while seasonal items slumped, but the net result was positive. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on WAG.<br /><br />WAG opened this morning at $25.43. So far today the stock has hit a low of $25.43 and a high of $26.78. As of 12:15, WAG is trading at $26.80, up $1.25 (4.9%). The chart for WAG looks neutral and <a target="_blank" href="http:// www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives WAG a 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking.<br /><br />For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider an April <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $20 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make an 8.7% return in just three and a half months as long as WAG is above $20 at April expiration. Walgreen would have to fall by more than 25% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">here</a>.<br /><br />WAG hasn't been below $21 at all in the past year and has shown support around $22.50 recently. <br /><br /><em>Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. <br /><br />DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in WAG</em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/walgreens-wag-posts-strong-december-sales/">Walgreen's (WAG) posts strong December sales</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/walgreens-wag-posts-strong-december-sales/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1419075/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/walgreens-wag-posts-strong-december-sales/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>options</category><category>same store sales</category><category>SameStoreSales</category><category>WAG</category><category>walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreens (WAG) backs out of Long's acquisition]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/walgreens-wag-backs-out-of-longs-acquisition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/walgreens-wag-backs-out-of-longs-acquisition/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/walgreens-wag-backs-out-of-longs-acquisition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/wag-logo.jpg" alt="WAG logo" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a> - <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys/option-chains">option chain</a>) shares are rising today after <a target="_blank" href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/walgreen-co-withdraws-proposal-to/rfid147083203">the company withdrew its buyout bid</a> for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/longs-drug-stores-corporation/ldg/nys">Long's Drug Stores</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/longs-drug-stores-corporation/ldg/nys">LDG</a>). This clears the way for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) to complete its $2.7 billion buyout offer of LDG, which was a smaller offer than that of Walgreen.
<p>It seems that investors approve of this action, since WAG is up a nice chunk today. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on WAG. </p>
<p>WAG opened this morning at $26.89. So far today the stock has hit a low of $26.44and a high of $27.27. As of 12:30, WAG is trading at $26.80, up 62 cents (2.3%). The chart for WAG looks bearish and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives WAG a 3 STARS (out of 5) hold ranking. </p>
<p>For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a November <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $25 range. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/walgreens-wag-backs-out-of-longs-acquisition/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreens (WAG) backs out of Long's acquisition</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/walgreens-wag-backs-out-of-longs-acquisition/">Walgreens (WAG) backs out of Long's acquisition</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/walgreens-wag-backs-out-of-longs-acquisition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1337704/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/09/walgreens-wag-backs-out-of-longs-acquisition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>investors observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>LDG</category><category>longs drug stores</category><category>LongsDrugStores</category><category>options</category><category>WAG</category><category>walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen, Kroger expected to report profit growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/walgreen-kroger-expected-to-report-profit-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/walgreen-kroger-expected-to-report-profit-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/walgreen-kroger-expected-to-report-profit-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kr/" rel="tag">Kroger Co (KR)</a></p><p>Though the quarter is winding down, there are still earnings reports to come, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kroger-co-the/kr/nys">Kroger Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kroger-co-the/kr/nys" target="_blank">KR</a>). Both companies are expected to report profit growth this coming week.</p>
<p><strong><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walgreens-wag-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Walgreen </strong>is expected by analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial to report third-quarter earnings of 59 cents per share, up 6.8% from the same period of last year, on revenue of $15.1 billion. The company has provided <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/walgreen-co/wag/nys/actuals-estimates" target="_blank">positive surprises</a> in four of the past five quarters -- by two cents in the previous quarter.</p>
<p>Based in Deerfield, Ill., Walgreen is the largest drug store chain in the U.S. in terms of sales, and has more than 6,200 stores in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. In the past year, the company's revenues were $53.7 billion and its net income totaled $2.0 billion. Its long-term EPS growth forecast is 14.0%, which is less than the retail industry average, as well as less than that of rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>). The consensus recommendation of analysts has recently shifted from hold to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/walgreen-co/wag/nys/analyst-recommendations">buy Walgreen</a>.</p>
<p>The share price is up 4.0% since the beginning of the year, and up from 11.6% from a year ago. It trades at a P/E ratio of 20.68. Shares closed Friday at $41.35.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/walgreen-kroger-expected-to-report-profit-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Walgreen, Kroger expected to report profit growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/walgreen-kroger-expected-to-report-profit-growth/">Walgreen, Kroger expected to report profit growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/walgreen-kroger-expected-to-report-profit-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1232152/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/22/walgreen-kroger-expected-to-report-profit-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CVS</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>KR</category><category>Kroger</category><category>Safeway</category><category>SWY</category><category>WAG</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreens</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Battle of the Brands: CVS vs. Walgreens]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/02/battle-of-the-brands-cvs-vs-walgreens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/02/battle-of-the-brands-cvs-vs-walgreens/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/02/battle-of-the-brands-cvs-vs-walgreens/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/battle-cvs-walgreen-200x267dr.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/battle-for-best-brands">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and check out other Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys"><strong>CVS Caremark Corp</strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) -- with 6,200 stores and a pharmacy benefits management division -- beats <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co.</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) -- with 5,997 stores -- hands down in the battle of the brands. It's bigger, its earnings are growing faster, it has a higher P/E and its stock has grown faster over the last year and five years. Walgreen wins on one measure: it has a fatter profit margin.</p>
<p>Here's how the two score on these measures:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Revenues.</strong> $76 billion (CVS) beats $54 billion (Walgreens) </li>
    <li><strong>Earnings growth.</strong> 12% (CVS) beats 6% (Walgreens) </li>
    <li><strong>Profit margins. </strong>3.8% (Walgreens) beats 3.45% (CVS) </li>
    <li><strong>P/E. </strong>21.3 (CVS) beats 17 (Walgreens) </li>
    <li><strong>One year stock performance</strong>.+16% (CVS) beats -22% (Walgreens) </li>
    <li><strong>Five year stock performance.</strong> +250% (CVS) beats +16% (Walgreens) </li>
</ul>
<p><iframe align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1409&amp;view=138978&amp;pollId=139120&amp;channel=aol_us_bizmainpolls" frameborder="1" width="190" scrolling="no" height="135"></iframe><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><em></em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the letter="" cohan=""></the></em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.</em></p>
<p><em>Vote in our poll for <strong>CVS </strong>or <strong>Walgreens </strong>as your preferred brand, and let us know in the comments why you love it.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/02/battle-of-the-brands-cvs-vs-walgreens/">Battle of the Brands: CVS vs. Walgreens</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 May 2008 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/02/battle-of-the-brands-cvs-vs-walgreens/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1175695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/02/battle-of-the-brands-cvs-vs-walgreens/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Battle of the Brands</category><category>Caremark</category><category>CVS</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Merger that created Citigroup was a mistake, one of deal's architects says]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvs/" rel="tag">CVS Corp (CVS)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Luqman Arnold, the former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-new/ubs/nys">UBS AG</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ubs-ag-new/ubs/nys">UBS</a>) president forced out in 2001, wants the firm to split its investment bank from the private client bank, and look at selling the investment bank and asset management business, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120725574276087561.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal's</em></a> "Heard on the Street".</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) bid to acquire <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo! Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) has not gained any steam even though executives of the two companies met this week, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120728254600289107.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported.</li>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/adb7e4a6-019d-11dd-a323-000077b07658.html"><em>Financial Times</em></a> reported that the landmark merger that created <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup Incorporated</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) was a "mistake" that failed to benefit the financial services giant's investors, customers and employees, said John Reed, who masterminded the $166B deal with Sandy Weill in 1998. Reed, the former head of Citicorp, has advised Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit at least to consider spin-offs, sources said.</li>
</ul>
<strong>WEB SITES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) is branching out by acquiring two companies that provide health-care services, <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_15/c4079insidewal917146.htm?chan=search"><em>BusinessWeek</em></a> reported, following in its competitor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark Corporation's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) shoes. Some investors are wary of Walgreen's move, but Mark Wiltamuth of Morgan Stanley sees it as a new growth avenue and as a push into services complementary to drugstores.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/">Newspaper wrap-up: Merger that created Citigroup was a mistake, one of deal's architects says</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1158448/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/04/newspaper-wrap-up-merger-that-created-citigroup-was-a-mistake/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>Citicorp</category><category>citigroup</category><category>citigroup inc. (c)</category><category>CitigroupInc.(c)</category><category>cvs</category><category>cvs caremark</category><category>cvscaremark</category><category>microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>UBS</category><category>UBS AG</category><category>UbsAg</category><category>vikram pandit</category><category>VikramPandit</category><category>WAG</category><category>walgreen</category><category>walgreens</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurie Pasternack]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings previews: Walgreen and Tiffany]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/23/earnings-previews/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/23/earnings-previews/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/23/earnings-previews/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tif/" rel="tag">Tiffany and Co (TIF)</a></p><p>Leading drug store chain <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) and upscale specialty retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tiffany-and-company/tif/nys">Tiffany &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tiffany-and-company/tif/nys">TIF</a>) are scheduled to report earnings tomorrow. Here's a quick peek at them ahead of results.</p>
<p><strong><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/wag-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Walgreen</strong> has <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/walgreen-co/wag/nys">beat earnings estimates</a> in four of the past five quarters. When the company reported first-quarter results back in November, earnings came to 46 cents per share, two cents less than the consensus forecast of analysts polled by Thomson Financial, and up from the 43 cents in the same period of the previous year. For the current quarter, analysts expect 67 cents per share, compared to 65 cents in the year-ago quarter. </p>
<p>The company's earnings per share growth forecast for this year is 9.42%, which is better than the industry average but less than the 30.68% of rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>). The analysts' consensus recommendation is to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/earnings/walgreen-co/wag/nys/analyst-recommendations">hold Walgreen</a>, and has been for the past three months. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/charts/walgreen-co/wag/nys/classic-charts">Shares have risen</a> since hitting a 52-week low of $32.50 in January, and closed Friday at $36.78.</p>
<p>For news about Walgreens that could influence the earnings results, see BloggingStocks' <a href="http://wag.bloggingstocks.com/">Walgreen coverage</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/23/earnings-previews/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings previews: Walgreen and Tiffany</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/23/earnings-previews/">Earnings previews: Walgreen and Tiffany</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/23/earnings-previews/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1146588/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/23/earnings-previews/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>TIF</category><category>Tiffany</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreen (WAG) blames lower quarterly profit on generic drug prices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/walgreen-wag-sees-lower-quarterly-profit-blames-generic-drug/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/walgreen-wag-sees-lower-quarterly-profit-blames-generic-drug/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/walgreen-wag-sees-lower-quarterly-profit-blames-generic-drug/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/14787.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) is trading down around 14% as of this morning after the drug retailer announced that its <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/walgreen-profit-hurt-lower-generic/story.aspx?guid=%7BFF3760D7%2DA3B3%2D4AED%2DA753%2D5ABA9AD92BEA%7D&amp;siteid=aolpfaolpf1">fourth quarter net income fell</a> to $396.5 million ($0.40 per share) from $412.3 million ($0.41 per share) in the year ago period. Although net sales rose to $13.42 billion from $12.17 billion, the profit shortfall is being placed squarely on lower generic drug reimbursements and higher employee costs and expenses.<br /><br />Is Walgreen's feeling the heat from the $4 generic prescription drug program announced by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>) just over a year ago? It could certainly be seen that way. Same-store sales did increase by 6.3% during the quarter, so although Walgreen's saw increases in terms of sales and revenues, the chain apparently failed to keep its expenses down during the same time. Couple that with the generic drug situation that's still in flux and you have a down quarter. Or, at least that is the way the market is interpreting the numbers as WAG shares are spiking down big-time this morning.<br /><br />Walgreen's Chairman Jeffrey Rein stated that "Our expenses weren't in line with the level of reimbursements we were receiving. Managing both expenses and lower reimbursements on some generic drugs is my top priority." Seems reasonable, although it's been a while since the generic price cuts seen around the industry started happening. Although Walgreen's sees $2 billion in capital investments in fiscal 2008, the cost situation seems to be a tad out of hand at this time without even considering the capital improvements soon to come.<br /><br />WAG <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">shares are at $40.44</a> as of 11:48, down over 14.3% from Friday's close.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/walgreen-wag-sees-lower-quarterly-profit-blames-generic-drug/">Walgreen (WAG) blames lower quarterly profit on generic drug prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/walgreen-profit-hurt-lower-generic/story.aspx?guid=%7BFF3760D7%2DA3B3%2D4AED%2DA753%2D5ABA9AD92BEA%7D&amp;siteid=aolpfaolpf1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/walgreen-wag-sees-lower-quarterly-profit-blames-generic-drug/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1002206/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/walgreen-wag-sees-lower-quarterly-profit-blames-generic-drug/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>generic drug prices</category><category>GenericDrugPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>WAG</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>walgreens</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Walgreens bounces back ahead of CVS/CMX vote]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/14/walgreens-bounces-back-ahead-of-cvs-cmx-vote/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/14/walgreens-bounces-back-ahead-of-cvs-cmx-vote/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/14/walgreens-bounces-back-ahead-of-cvs-cmx-vote/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wag/" rel="tag">Walgreen Co (WAG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><a href="http://investor.walgreens.com/home.cfm" target="_blank"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/wag-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>Walgreen Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>) opened at $44.28. So far today the stock has hit a low of $44.24 and a high of $45.05. As of 1:00 this afternoon, WAG is trading at 44.10, down 0.04 (-0.1%), well off its morning highs.</p>
<p>After hitting a one year high of 51.60 in September, the stock dropped sharply and has since seen resistance around 47. <a href="http://www.marketintelligencecenter.com/signupstory.aspx?story=1011325&amp;t=1">Tensions</a> over the deal between CVS (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>) and Caremark (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/caremark-rx-inc/cmx/nys">CMX</a>) <a href="http://www.marketintelligencecenter.com/signupstory.aspx?story=1010539&amp;t=1">wreaked havoc</a> on drug store stocks yesterday, including a big dip in WAG stock yesterday afternoon. Most of these stocks bounced back earlier today but are now sliding with the rest of the market, with the CVS/CMX vote scheduled for tomorrow. The technical indicators for WAG have been bearish and steady, while <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.</p>
<p>For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a July <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bull-put credit spread</a> below the $37.50 range. WAG hasn't been below 39.50 at all in the past year, and has shown support around 40. This trade could be risky depending on how the CVS-CMX deal turns out, but the strong support for WAG around 40 could protect this position.</p>
<p><em>Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at <a href="http://www.iotogo.com/aolblogba">Investors Observer</a>. (Free Subscription)</em></p>
<p><em>DISCLOSURE: Mr. Archer owns and/or controls diversified portfolios of long and short stock and option positions that may include holdings in companies he writes about.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/14/walgreens-bounces-back-ahead-of-cvs-cmx-vote/">Walgreens bounces back ahead of CVS/CMX vote</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/14/walgreens-bounces-back-ahead-of-cvs-cmx-vote/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/852457/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/14/walgreens-bounces-back-ahead-of-cvs-cmx-vote/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Caremark</category><category>CMX</category><category>CVS</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
