<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Despite Economic Woes, Wall Street Pay Set to Jump]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/06/dollarsign.jpg"  alt="" />Wall Street employees <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704518104575546542463746562.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews%20">will make a record $144 billion this year</a> -- a 4% increase from 2009. <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported that the compensation figures comprise pay and benefits at "about three dozen of the top publicly held securities and investment-services firms -- which include banks, investment banks, hedge funds, money-management firms and securities exchanges."<br />
<br />
Revenue will rise at 29 of the 35 firms that had their pay plans examined by the paper. But the <em>Journal </em>says that revenue at the firms will not rise as quickly as compensation. Wall Street revenue is expected to improve 3% to $448 billion this year compared to last. Employee payout as a percent of revenue will remain flat at 32.1%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Despite Economic Woes, Wall Street Pay Set to Jump</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/">Despite Economic Woes, Wall Street Pay Set to Jump</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19670335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/12/despite-economic-woes-wall-street-pay-set-to-jump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bankers</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>wall street bonuses</category><category>wall street pay</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street Bonuses Top $20.3 Billion in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/wall-street-bonuses-top-20-3-billion-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/wall-street-bonuses-top-20-3-billion-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/wall-street-bonuses-top-20-3-billion-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/piggy-bank.jpg"  alt="" />New York State comptroller Thomas DiNapoli has issued the numbers for <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/35536606">Wall Street bonuses in 2009</a>. The total was $20.3 billion, up 17% from the previous year.</p>
<p>Wall Street profits totaled an unprecedented $55 billion in 2009. The average bonus was $123,850 dollars.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/wall-street-bonuses-top-20-3-billion-in-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street Bonuses Top $20.3 Billion in 2009</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/wall-street-bonuses-top-20-3-billion-in-2009/">Wall Street Bonuses Top $20.3 Billion in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/wall-street-bonuses-top-20-3-billion-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19369630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/23/wall-street-bonuses-top-20-3-billion-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>JPM</category><category>JPMorgan</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MS</category><category>Thomas DiNapoli</category><category>Wall Street bonuses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are bank bonuses excessive?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" alt="" />Wall Street is getting back to normal. How do we know that? One gauge: measuring Wall Street's health is the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a25cbLmExCXs">amount of bonuses bank employees receive.</a></p>
<p>Here are just a few numbers that reflect how Wall Street is doing:</p>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">Goldman Sachs Group</a> (NYSE <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys">GS</a>) set aside $16.7 billion dollars for compensation in 2009, just a few dollars short of the record $16.9 billion set in 2007. </li>
    <li>Each employee at Goldman averages $527,192.00</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are bank bonuses excessive?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/">Are bank bonuses excessive?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a25cbLmExCXs>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19202457/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/are-bank-bonuses-excessive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank bonuses</category><category>BankBonuses</category><category>featured</category><category>Wall Street bonuses</category><category>WallStreetBonuses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street, 2009: Deaf, blind, and just plain dumb]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-2009-deaf-blind-and-just-plain-dumb/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-2009-deaf-blind-and-just-plain-dumb/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-2009-deaf-blind-and-just-plain-dumb/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/bankers.jpg" alt="" />In <em>Gone with the Wind</em>, Rhett Butler wryly notes that there is "just as much money to be made out of the wreckage of a civilization as from the upbuilding of one." Having observed the near-Roman excesses of New York's money men over the past couple of years, I might go even further and argue that the end of a civilization tends to be even more outrageously profligate than its beginning. After all, it's hard to imagine stern, conservative men like J.P. Morgan and Andrew Mellon giving in to the incredible excesses of the latest round of would-be magnates.<br /><br />While tales like Stephen Schwarzman's million dollar <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/01/buffett-and-schwarzman-two-sides-of-american-business/">birthday</a> and Dick Fuld's five <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article5594623.ece">homes</a> tend to capture the public's attention, these outrageous expenditures are only the tip of the iceberg. From $175 <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2008/05/28/the-175-burger-conspicuous-consumption-or-edible-art/">hamburgers</a> at the Wall Street Burger Shoppe to John Thain's $1.22 million office <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28793892">redecoration</a>, it has become increasingly clear that New York's financial workers have spent the last few years living in a completely alien world. What's more, they are either unable or unwilling to adapt to the changing realities of America's economy.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-2009-deaf-blind-and-just-plain-dumb/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wall Street, 2009: Deaf, blind, and just plain dumb</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-2009-deaf-blind-and-just-plain-dumb/">Wall Street, 2009: Deaf, blind, and just plain dumb</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2009/01/29/merrill-lynch-bailout-bonuses-for-bungling/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/business/29bonus.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-2009-deaf-blind-and-just-plain-dumb/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445023/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/wall-street-2009-deaf-blind-and-just-plain-dumb/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arianna huffington</category><category>AriannaHuffington</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>Dick Fuld</category><category>DickFuld</category><category>John Thain</category><category>JohnThain</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>Wall Street bonuses</category><category>WallStreetBonuses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The mad, mad world of Wall Street bonuses]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/retirement-savings-150a080206.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />This year Wall Street bonuses are looking to hit a new record. Last year, they hit a record of <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/11/markets/job_bonuses/index.htm">$21.5 billion</a> and I've seen estimates that they'll be up between <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/07/business/07wall.html?ex=1320555600&amp;en=99353bba1c4e0eb8&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">10% and 25%</a> in 2006. </p>
<p>One expert, Options Group, estimates that the big winners will be investment bankers and equity underwriters and traders. Driven by a record year in mergers, investment bankers will receive bonuses 20% to 25% higher than in 2005, as will those in equity derivatives sales. The "losers" will be fixed-income proprietary traders, who will earn the same or less than they did in 2005. </p>
<p>This year, the best place for bonus babies is the Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS), which is distributing <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/13/is-goldman-sachs-a-good-long-term-holding/">$16.5 billion</a> worth of bonuses among its 36,000 employees -- up 40% from 2005. While this averages out to $623,418 per full-time employee, a few traders will take home $100 million. </p>
<p>How can any company justify paying so much money to one person? That $100 million bonus is <strong>2,159</strong> times the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/fsbr/income.html">$46,326</a> that the median U.S. family earns every year! Do traders really work <strong>2,159 </strong>times harder than the average family? Are their lives really <strong>2,159</strong> more stressful? How can any CEO justify paying out so much money?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The mad, mad world of Wall Street bonuses</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/">The mad, mad world of Wall Street bonuses</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/718853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/21/the-mad-mad-world-of-wall-street-bonuses/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>Blankfein</category><category>bonus</category><category>equity underwriters</category><category>executive compensation</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GS</category><category>Hank Paulsen</category><category>investment bankers</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>Lloyd Blankfein</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>Options Group</category><category>Robin Hood</category><category>wall street bonuses</category><category>WallStreetBonuses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:29:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
