<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Citigroup wows the street -- but it should split in two]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/citigroup-wows-the-street-but-it-should-split-in-two/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/citigroup-wows-the-street-but-it-should-split-in-two/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/citigroup-wows-the-street-but-it-should-split-in-two/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Well I was wrong. Instead of coming in a penny short as I had predicted, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-inc/c/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Citigroup Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-inc/c/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">C</a>) beat Wall Street estimates for its first quarter earnings.</p>
<p>Despite a decline in earnings, as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/business/business-citigroup-results.html?ref=business"><em>Reuters</em></a> reports, Citigroup's earnings adjusted for restructuring charges came in 9 cents a share ahead of the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/13/citigroup-earnings-preview/">expected $1.09</a>. Net income fell for the third straight quarter, declining to $5.01 billion, or $1.01 per share, from $5.64 billion, or $1.12, a year earlier. And excluding an $871 million restructuring charge, profit totaled $1.18 per share.</p>
<p>The best news from my perspective is that revenue growth was strong while cost growth decelerated. Specifically Citigroup revenue rose 15% to $25.46 billion, while operating expenses rose 17% to $15.57 billion. Excluding the charge, however, expenses rose just 6%. This compares favorably to the 23% cost growth in the fourth quarter of 2006. The first quarter revenue growth of 15% matches that of last year's fourth quarter.</p>
<p>The <strong>good news</strong>? Trading and investment banking. Assets hit $2 trillion for the first time, ending the quarter at $2.02 trillion -- helped by a 40% rise in trading account assets, to $460.1 billion. Revenue was up 20% from fixed-income capital markets and 26% from equity markets which boosted corporate and investment banking profit 36% to $2.62 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/citigroup-wows-the-street-but-it-should-split-in-two/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citigroup wows the street -- but it should split in two</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/citigroup-wows-the-street-but-it-should-split-in-two/">Citigroup wows the street -- but it should split in two</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:37:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-inc/c/nys?tabs=quotesandnews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/citigroup-wows-the-street-but-it-should-split-in-two/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/875131/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/16/citigroup-wows-the-street-but-it-should-split-in-two/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>C</category><category>chuck prince</category><category>ChuckPrince</category><category>Investment banking</category><category>InvestmentBanking</category><category>NYSE</category><category>Wall Street</category><category>Wall Street firms</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetFirms</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:37:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
