Waste Management (NYSE: WMI - option chain) announced its earnings yesterday and dropped almost 5% on the report, but also sneaked in a little tidbit that I find amusing. WMI declared that as of 8/5, it will trade on the NYSE as WM, which until earlier this year designated Washington Mutual. How appropriate that a company that specializes in, um... waste management, has collected this trashed ticker from the curb and will recycle it for its own purposes.

WMI CEO David Steiner did not mention that connection in the company's announcement, instead saying,"From our trucks to our uniforms, the very recognizable WM represents our company and our people. The WM symbol reinforces how customers, communities and shareholders have come to think of us over the past years, and aligns our branding with our stock symbol." I guess that makes sense it you picture a green Waste Management truck or the logo attached to this post, but I imagine the board members considering the change and relishing how apt it would be.

As for the stock itself, yesterday's earnings came in a penny below expectations and guided downwards for the rest of the year, but this business is not going away any time soon. Also, yesterday's stock dip could have been the result of raised expectations, as WMI had been rising steadily for almost all of July. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on WMI.

Over the past few weeks, we've seen some of the extensive damage done to the mega private equity operators, such as the Blackstone Group LLP (NYSE: BX) and KKR.

Now, according to a report from Reuters, we've got the details on the performance of TPG. And, of course, it's ugly (interestingly enough, TPG's roots are in the distressed investing category).

If you were among the millions of unemployed workers looking for a job in 2009, would you accept a 50% pay cut? That's the question that Shaun Chedister faced last year, according to CNNMoney. And his answer, after spending eight months looking for a new job, was yes. Unfortunately for Chedister, that pay cut meant giving up the lifestyle he had enjoyed before he got laid off.

Chedister had been making $125,000 at Washington Mutual but he was laid off from that job at the end of 2007. He spent eight months looking for a job to support his wife and four children. He ultimately accepted an offer from Ernst & Young as an executive administrator -- the catch? The job paid slightly more than half of what he was making before -- $66,000.

The problem was that Chedister's unemployment had run out and he still had bills to pay. Chedister is looking for a more affordable house and in December one of his cars was repossessed after he got behind on the payments. This hurts but once you lose a job you have two choices: keep looking or accept what's offered -- and that offer is likely to be less than what you made before.

If you look at major private equity firms, they have huge amounts of capital ready for investment. So, when the credit crunch subsides, there should be a revival of buyout activity, right?

Not necessarily. Keep in mind that the amounts of capital available may be much lower. The reason: private equity firms usually have so-called capital calls. That means, over time they notify investors to pony up the required amounts of capital.

True, private equity firms are legally required to make the disbursements. But, if there is resistance, will private equity firms actually sue their investors?

Well, this is a big dilemma right now. Just look at TPG Capital. That is, according to The Wall Street Journal, the firm is paring back the capital requirements on its $20 billion fund. In all, it comes to about 10% of the total amount.

Something else: TPG will cut its management fees by 10%.

Of course, TPG has suffered some black eyes this year, such as its disastrous investment in Washington Mutual as well as big bets on bank debt.

Of course, the firm is not alone. Other tier-1 players are also sitting on some busted deals.

TPG's actions are certainly precedent setting – and are likely to be followed by its peers as we go into 2009. And, as a result, expect continued tepidness for deal-making.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Streetsmart Guide to Short Selling: Techniques the Pros Use to Profit in Any Market. He is also the founder of BizEquity, a valuation website.

All is not well in Seattle for executives at Washington Mutual. The Seattle Times has reported that some 3,400 WaMu employees, mostly from the company's headquarters, are to be let go by JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM). The good news for workers is, it appears that employees at WaMu's branch operations will, for the most part, be spared the ax.

These types of staff dismissals should come as no surprise in an era when companies are quickly consolidating just to survive. I suppose that it's fairly standard practice for an acquiring company to thin out the executive herd of any distressed company which it has recently purchased. In regard to this particular instance, The Seattle Times quotes JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon as stating: "We are going to build a great company for the long run. Unfortunately, that entails tough decisions in the short run." Tough decisions always tend to ooze downward.

To the credit of JP Morgan & Chase, the executives who are to receive their walking papers at WaMu, will apparently be sent off with moderate severance packages. However, this does little to lessen the pain of good jobs lost. Additionally, The Seattle Times article opens a discussion about the ramifications of this deep payroll cut and operations consolidation upon the local commercial lease space market in a city with an impending surplus of commercial office space.

Preliminary indications are that JPMorgan's consolidation of WaMu in to the 42-story WaMu Center will put approximately 500,000 square feet of commercial lease space back into the hands of Seattle landlords. At least one commercial real estate broker in Seattle indicated that WaMu's withdrawal from commercial space there could lead to slight downward pressure on rents. However, citing a rental office inventory of approximately 37 million square feet, Oscar Oliveira, a senior vice president with brokerage Colliers International, is quoted by The Seattle Times as stating: "It adds a couple percentage points to the vacancy rate... The bank's moves alone won't push lease rates down..."

If you're a fan of found humor as strange juxtapositions, FailBlog.org definitely belongs in your RSS feed. But it's rare that the site contains brilliant -- and unintentional -- commentary on the state of the economy.

FailBlog posted this picture of the neon sign at a Washington Mutual branch office. All that's left is "Was." Before it collapsed in the largest bank failure in history, Washington Mutual was a leader in banking and home loans. It was picked up off the scrap heap by JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM).

More gallows humors: Andy Kessler has suggested that after Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) completes its acquisition of Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER), the combined company should rename itself "Lynch America Countrywide."

Everything is upside down these days. The folks with all the money and multi-million dollar bonuses are begging for a handout on the pretext that the economy will crash if they do not get one. We're not talking money for coffee or a snack, we're talking billions of dollars.

It is crashing anyway, or at least sinking. It is just a matter of what it takes down along the way. Apparently, the folks at the Treasury and Federal Reserve are now convinced that it will be everything.

The survivors are pawing at the defeated as Wells Fargo tries to grab Wachovia despite its previous tentative agreement with Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C). While Citigroup gained a point in Wachovia deal over the weekend, the balance has since tilted in favor of Wells Fargo again.

Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) gobbled up Countrywide (done) and Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) (a work in progress), while JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) corralled Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM).

Sadly, only the federal government was big enough to swallow the problems of American International Group (NYSE: AIG), Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE). Otherwise,those in the know think world financial markets would have crumbled due to the collateral damage, (pun intended).

When I posted Congress is screwing up -- think backstop not bailout!, I was concerned with the psychological effect as much as the financial effect of not approving the funding, but no doubt the people suffering the most are not those who created the pain.

In what I feared might become a regular feature here, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) arranged for the takeover of the 13th failed bank of 2008 Thursday. As I posted, the FDIC likes to close banks on Friday after hours so it can reopen as branches of the acquiring bank on the following Monday morning. But since this is history's biggest bank failure, the FDIC couldn't wait for the weekend. The bank in question is the $310 billion (assets) Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM).

This is history's biggest bank failure -- it's almost eight times bigger than the previous record holder, Continental Illinois. In this case, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) was the rescuer, buying WaMu from the FDIC. This follows JPMorgan's purchase of Bear Stearns back in March in which the Federal Reserve provided a $29 billion loan. But this deal will cost JPMorgan far less -- a mere $1.9 billion, and it will write down WaMu's loan portfolio by 10% in the process. To further bolster its position, JPMorgan will raise $8 billion in capital.

What does JPMorgan get for all this? Branches for one thing -- 5,400 in 23 states -- and it will shutter 10% of the combined branches. What JPMorgan does not get is much of the junk that WaMu carried and by that I refer to "senior unsecured debt, subordinated debt, and preferred stock of WaMu's banks, any assets or liabilities of the holding company, Washington Mutual Inc.; or [WaMu's] lawsuits."

In an enormous and startling turn of events, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. has taken over Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM), forcing it into an arranged marriage. According to reports in the Wall Street Journal, the FDIC reached out to the nation's biggest banks, asking them to make an offer. JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) was the one to step up to the plate, taking over the bank's deposits and branches. The value of the deal, and the fate of the bad assets, isn't currently known; but equityholders and senior debt holders will be wiped out.

Depositors leery of the bank's failure were part of the problem; $16.7 billion in deposits have been taken out of the bank since September 15. According to the WSJ, the FDIC fund won't be affected by the takeover.

TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says there are some events out there -- WaMu being the biggest -- that make the plan worth adopting.

The vote from Monday's market was pretty resounding: The plan won't help. Or if it does, it will be too costly and there are too many details that can't be worked out.

So should it just be let go?

I am a big believer in the plan because there are some events out there that would make the plan worth adopting no matter what. And the biggest event is Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) (Cramer's Take). Here's a firm that just had its debt downgraded again last night, and if you read the ratings downgrades you can't see how the feds can avoid seizing it.

But what happens when they seize it? The thing is so mammoth that it would overwhelm the FDIC. Although with this administration's magic-wand philosophy, maybe we can just get some stopgap funding. Or maybe we just say, "As long as there are no lines outside WM, we are fine." But at a certain point, no investors are going to want to buy any of this company's debt and the losses could be too great.

Citigroup (NYSE: C) is considering buying Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM), the nation's largest savings and loan. It sounds like Sandy Weill is back in charge and trying to create the kind of financial conglomerate he built in the 1990s and earlier this decade.

According to The Wall Street Journal, "Citigroup and several other banks are reviewing the Seattle thrift holding company's books, which are packed with shaky mortgages."

Just a few months ago, Citi CEO Vikram Pandit was talking about cutting the big bank's expenses by 20% and selling off "non-core" assets. Now he is thinking about buying the most troubled large financial company in America.

Pandit would be better off staying with his first plan. There is a reason WaMu's stock got down to under $2. If mortgage defaults move up and housing prices move down, the mortgage company's financial situation could get much worse.

Pandit is proving to be a "flavor-of-the-month" CEO. Investors never know what he plans to do tomorrow, let alone what he wants to do with Citi over the next year.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com

So what's an investor to think? Last Friday I seemed clever buying Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) on a dip (Chasing Value: Are you watching WaMu?) only to be crushed a few days later when Meridian Capital's Alan Fishman CEO, was announced as Kerry Killinger's replacement and bad news about Lehman Br Holdings (NYSE: LEH) became cement shoes around WaMu's feet all week.

Yesterday I stood by Friday's rationale, but took the hit for the down stock on the unknown cash-flow issues based on Wall Street's questioning WaMu's potential difficulty funding ongoing operations until it returned to profitability. See: Chasing Value: Not -- WaMu one week later - ouch!

By the end of the day the stock was up 21% as Washington Mutual tried to soothe anxiety. It backed up it's claim of stability by challenging the rating agencies to look over its books so that they could verify that WM currently had liquidity levels in excess of regulator requirements, and that it should not have a problem maintaining operations based on current levels of capital. Nevertheless, all the ratings agencies downgraded the company.

No sooner did I post about Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) last Friday (Chasing Value: Are you watching WaMu?) and buy it, I was undercut by the announcement of a change at the top.

The news just two days later read: Washington Mutual Will Name Meridian Capital's Alan Fishman CEO, WSJ Says.

I have made some bad picks and had some bad timing but this must be the biggest blunder so far.

This morning I received the following comment to last Friday's post:

• Mike said; Ya, Wamu... Great stock. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha

So I cannot hide from the truth and while their are brighter stock pickers on the Web then I, at least I can try to maintain the highest level of integrity. It is not so much that my commentary last Friday was unfounded or untrue, but that it appears from Wall Streets perspective to be another case of Washington Mutual doing 'too little too late'. That clearly is also the opinion of the WaMu Board because the ouster of WaMu CEO Kerry Killinger is part of that story.

Mr. Killinger was apparently very quick to promote questionable lending practices and very slow to admit his blunders and take corrective action. While the bank may have many positive attributes, if it does not have the cash to survive the current industry and internal difficulties then as many think it will not survive in it's current form. I hope not to make the same mistake and that is part of why I feel it is important to admit my errors responsibly and to also provide readers a forum to express their thoughts.

This morning there is plenty of banter about the company searching for a buyer, another idea Killinger resisted earlier in the year. Now whatever happens he will not be a part of the decision.

Last Friday WaMu closed at $4.27. It is trading $2.14, down $0.18 as of 11:55 AM EDT.

FINAL UPDATE: closed today at $2.83, up $0.51 or 21.98% -- go figure?

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. Disclosure: I own shares of WM.

For several years I held Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) stock, happy with some slow growth and a very sizable dividend yield. It was so stable for so long that I and others included it in our 'safe havens' selections. This eventually turned into a disaster with the collapse of the financial sector and WaMu along with it.

There is quite a lot of debate as to whether it is time to get back into financial stocks or if we are in for years of more torment in the sector. The bad news and write-downs certainly have not abated recently.

My colleague Zac Bissonnette posted Value investors leap out of financials: sign of a bottom? raising the issue of capitulation by those who might have been hanging on to a shred of hope for a turnaround. Now they are taking their losses. Perhaps they will take advantage of the 30-day rule and get back in next month after booking the losses.

It has been five weeks since I posted Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials. The results of buying into the following pool of financial stocks at a time when the "hate 'em" factor was at a peak has been tremendous. The over all return has has been 26.3% with eight stocks up and two down.

For investors this might have been too speculative; for traders, they are probably grinning from ear to ear. For me -- we will see where we stand next year. As one of my colleagues reminded me, this is the real test, although I think there is reason for optimism.

The leader of the pack was MBIA Inc (NYSE: MBI), up 228%. In the absence of that gain the appreciation would have only been 3.5%. That beats all the indices but is not as dramatic.

• Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) -- $18.45 down 63% from its 52 week high of $49.90; closed yesterday at $19.11, UP 3.57%
  
• Lehman Br Holdings (NYSE: LEH) -- $16.88 down 75% from its 52 week high of $67.73; closed yesterday at $16.13, down 4.44%
• Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) -- $26.25 down 67% from its 52 week high of $79.72; closed yesterday at $27.75, UP 5.7%.
• MBIA Inc (NYSE: MBI) -- $4.92 down 93% from its 52 week high of $68.98; closed yesterday at $16.14, UP 228%.
• E*TRADE (NASDAQ: ETFC) -- $3.06 down 84% from its 52 week high of $19.39; closed yesterday at $3.25, UP 6.2.
• East West Bancorp (NASDAQ: EWBC) -- $12.46 down 67% from its 52 week high of $20.88; closed yesterday at $13.01, UP 4.4%.
• Gramercy Capital (NYSE: GKK) -- $6.72 down 77% from its 52 week high of $29.45; closed yesterday at $6.80, UP 1.2%.
• Newcastle Investment (NYSE: NCT) -- $5.88 down 72% from its 52 week high of $20.88; closed yesterday at $6.89, UP 17.18%.
• Wachovia Corp. (NYSE: WB) -- $15.70 down 70% from its 52 week high of $53.10; closed yesterday at $16.65, UP 6%.
• Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) -- $4.43 down 89% from its 52 week high of $39.48; closed yesterday at $4.24, down 4.29%

In my original post I emphasized that you had to buy the pool for safety. During the last month, we have seen many stories about Lehman Brothers' demise or the collapse of a major bank like WaMu or Wachovia, and if that had happened the gains in MBIA would have made up for the total and complete collapse of any one of them. I have no reason to believe this is immanent. I do have reason to believe the opposite. During the last month I bought additional shares of WaMu, one of the two down stocks at $3.50 per share.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. Disclosure: I own shares of MBI, NCT & WM.