TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the guys at the top don't know what they're doing, and it shows.
AIG's (NYSE: AIG) (Cramer's Take) making everyone's life difficult today. That's in part because AIG had been the biggest proponent of "super senior," meaning they repeatedly said that their collateralized debt obligation (CDO) exposure was of the kind that was intelligent, measured and thoughtful. They talked endlessly about how their due diligence made the difference and that unlike all of the other buyers, they kicked the tires three times and never bought the plain ol' CDOs. Then they brought in professors from Wharton to be sure that even if all heck broke loose and they were being too aggressive, they would be hedged.
They also were the first to give you the percentages of how much could go bad and that even in the worst-case scenario, they were overcapitalized. And, most important, they were insurers, no need to mark to market, they can play it all out.
Plus, they touted their own struggles. They made the point that because of the turmoil at the top, they hadn't bought any bad stuff and stopped buying residential real estate products after 2005. What they did buy -- they assured us in that big teach-in dog-and-pony show in December -- was the extra-special nature of their particular buys and that, unlike everyone else, risk officers scrutinized every single piece of paper that went into their super senior insurance, meaning only the top-top part of a CDO-squared, the part where everything had to default ahead of it; they made a point of how impossible that would be.
It has been a tough year for investors. We have been dealing with recession fears, housing market worries, high gasoline prices and a very weak U.S dollar. As much as we would love to say that the worst is behind us, we still could be in for some more rocky times ahead. So its best to try to figure out which stocks would be best to avoid for the time being.
Richard Gibbons wrote up a nice piece over on The Motley Fool that looks at some of the stocks that we would be wise to stay away from at this time. Regardless good or bad times, he is convinced there are always ways to make money, but in order to find the winners, it is also necessary to pull out the losers.
So how can we separate out the winners from the losers?
Gibbons seems to have a simple answer for this. He believes there is really no use in wasting our time trying to separate the winners from the losers as there are so many great cheap stocks that could offer us a chance to make money. Gibbons' advice is to not choose ugly and risky companies that could put our hard earned money at risk. To makes this clear, he uses a baseball analogy, expressing his options for the curve balls instead of the fastballs.
In an effort to increase sales in the Middle East, the Wall Street Journal reported that Dell Inc (NASDAQ: DELL) is in talks with a government-owned vehicle in Dubai called Tecom about establishing a joint venture.
The Wall Street Journal also reported that Washington Mutual Incorporated (NYSE: WM), which obtained a $7B capital infusion from TPG and other investors, had reportedly been working on the TPG deal while negotiating with JP Morgan Chase & Co (NYSE: JPM), which made a preliminary takeover bid of about $7B, people familiar with the deal said.
Citigroup Incorporated (NYSE: C) is close to reaching a deal to sell $12B in leveraged loans at a discount to a group of leading private equity firms, the Financial Times reported. Although details of the deal were still being worked out, inside sources said Apollo Management, The Blackstone Group LP (NYSE: BX) and TPG would buy the loan portfolio at a discount that could come in at about 90 cents on the dollar.
OTHER PAPERS:
The UK Times reported that The Boeing Company (NYSE: BA) is today expected to announce that its 787 Dreamliner has been delayed by 18 months, a setback which will affect all airlines that have ordered the 787, including British Airways Plc (OTC: BAIRY) and Virgin Atlantic.
After hitting a one-year high of $52.96 in October, the stock hit a one-year low of $33.12 in January. This morning, BAC opened at $39.18. So far today the stock has hit a low of $38.76 and a high of $39.30. As of 12:50, BAC is trading at $38.81, down $0.69 (-1.8%). The chart for BAC looks bullish but deteriorating, while S&P gives the stock a positive 4 STARS (out of 5) buy rating.
Fellow BloggingStocks contributor, Aaron Katsman, and I were discussing the pros and cons of investing in high-yield bonds this morning. You know, those types of risky bonds that pay a pretty good yield in return for investors lending a risky company their hard-earned cash. Inevitably, Washington Mutual's name came up.
Is it worth the risk of default to get some juicy yield?
Dunno, but just as we were discussing the troubled lender, some news rolled out over the wires.
Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM), the largest savings and loan in the U.S., announced it's taking an investment totaling $7 billion from an investor group led by private equity firm, TPG, or Texas Pacific Group.
Well, that helps provide some stability. At least for a while.
MOST NOTEWORTHY: Apple, Novartis and Infineon were today's noteworthy downgrades:
Morgan Keegan downgraded Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) to Underperform from Market Perform citing increased evidence of broad-based weakness in consumer technology spending in the U.S. and Europe. Additionally, the firm expects challenges in the company's education vertical due to state and local budget issues, which could lead to decelerating growth over the next 2-3 quarters.
Bear Stearns downgraded Novartis(NYSE: NVS) to Peer Perform from Outperform following the acquisition of Alcon (NYSE: ACL), as they find the deal expensive.
Credit Suisse cut Infineon (NYSE: IFX) to Neutral from Outperform to reflect weakness in the U.S. dollar.
OTHER DOWNGRADES:
Goldman downgraded Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and Zions Bancorp (ZION) to Neutral from Buy.
Keefe Bruyette cut Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) to Underperform from Market Perform.
Baird downgraded Flowserve (NYSE: FLS) to Neutral from Outperform.
General Motors Corporation (NYSE: GM) and Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) want to export more of their vehicles around the globe, and are getting a lift from new labor contracts and the weak dollar, which they believe will translate to bigger profits, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The Wall Street Journal also reported that former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan has been criticized for how he handled the economy before retiring two years ago, and is under attack for policies that many say started the current financial crisis.
OTHER PAPERS:
According to a person with knowledge of the matter, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported that The Boeing Company (NYSE: BA) is likely to announce a new delay of at least six more month for the 787 Dreamliner this week.
Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) shares are rising after a few news items regarding the company. First, C named Mark Rufeh as chief administrative officer and head of productivity for the institutional clients group. Rufeh is known as a cost-cutter, and the company hopes he can restore efficiency and discipline. Discover (NYSE: DFS) also agreed to buy Diner's Club from Citi. Lastly, most banks are getting a boost from the news that Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) may get as much as a $5 billion investment. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on C.
After hitting a one-year high of $55.55 in May, the stock hit a one-year low of $17.99 in March. C opened this morning at $24.85. So far today the stock has hit a low of $24.61 and a high of $25.19. As of 12:45, C is trading at $25.11, up $1.03 (4.2%). The chart for C looks neutral but improving, while S&P gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.
For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a June bull-put credit spread below the $17.50 range. A bull-put credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of put options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make an 8.7% return in just two and a half months as long as C is above $17.50 at June expiration. Citi would have to fall by more than 30% before we would start to lose money.
C hasn't been below $17.50 at all in the past year and has shown support around $21.50 recently. This trade could be risky if the US economy turns out not to have hit bottom yet, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by the support the stock might find around $20, where it found support twice in the past month.
Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at Investors Observer. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in C or DFS. He does control a bullish hedged play on WM that could be doing better.
News that Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) is close to receiving a $5 billion cash infusion from a U.S. consortium bucks the trend that we have seen of late where U.S. banks take money from foreign sovereign wealth funds. I think that this is a very important step.
First, it shows that American private equity groups believe that U.S. banks are starting to get cheap and they are willing to pull the trigger on some big deals. This should help drive the market forward, as it will be a sign to many that the worst is over.
Additionally, it keeps the financial system in U.S. hands. I posted a while back about the potential security threats posed to the U.S. by foreigners taking control of our financial system. One of the big tools in the war on terror has been using the banks to track all kinds of money transfers. With foreigners taking over sizable chunks of the banking system, this tool will be much harder for the security agencies to use.
Thirty years ago, when Washington Mutual was just a small local bank operating in the state of Washington, its slogan was "a friend of the family." It looks as if it is going back to its roots.
Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of IsraelNewsletter.com. DISCLOSURE: Writer's fund has no position in any stock mentioned, as of 4/7/08
Troubled savings and loan giant Washington Mutual Incorporated (NYSE: WM) will receive a $5B investment from private equity firm TPG and other investors, the Wall Street Journal reported. For now, this eliminates the possibility that it will be acquired by another financial institution such as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co (NYSE: JPM).
People close to the situation said that Delta Air Lines Inc (NYSE: DAL) and Northwest Airlines Corporation (NYSE: NWA) have revived merger talks. It is speculated, the Financial Times reported, that weak demand and high fuel costs are urging the airliners back to the table to work out a merger arrangement.
OTHER PAPERS:
Evergreen Solar Inc (NASDAQ: ESLR) is expected to announce today that it will double the size of its manufacturing facility in Massachusetts and add about 350 new jobs as part of its ongoing expansion, according to the Boston Globe.
WEB SITES:
Bloomberg reported that The Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE: GS) has been the only major investment bank that has refused to reduce its leverage. In fact, Goldman's adjusted leverage ratio of assets rose to 18.6 at the end of February, from 17.5 at the end of November.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer wonders -- can we handle this giant's failure?
As always, it is Citigroup (NYSE: C) (Cramer's Take). My smartest guys tell me that Citigroup has billions in assets it can sell, that there is ample opportunity for the company to reliquify, that Vikram Pandit has things under control and the slow bleed cuts are going to work to get costs down.
Now I have total confidence in Treasury, particularly in Bob Steel, to take care of the shorts and to create brilliant shotgun marriages that reward the rich banks and punish the poor.
BUT, I have no faith in Citigroup, which because of the moronic acquisitions and bizarre off-balance-sheet liabilities may technically be insolvent. When you consider it is too big to fail, you have to begin to wonder -- what's the plan if it can't make it? How far can forbearance go? Will we tolerate this bank being majority-owned by the sheiks or the communist Chinese? Seems far-fetched, but when I read Meredith Whitney's words this morning over at OPCO I know that the losses are going to be too big for the current base of capital.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says Tuesday's action addressed the systemic risk, but not the earnings problems.
Oh, shoot ... the fundamentals. Remember them? The ones not covered by Caterpillar's (NYSE: CAT) (Cramer's Take) rosy forecast for 2010? Yeah, those bits and pieces called earnings?
That's how I always feel after a big rally day when I know the economy is slowing, not getting better. We get some terrific news from the Fed as we did Tuesday, and we want to sound the all-clear. Instead we have to now deal with companies' earnings, and we know from Wellpoint (NYSE: WLP) (Cramer's Take) et al and Texas Instruments (NYSE: TXN) (Cramer's Take) et al that the Fed safety net doesn't take everything in with it.
So what did happen yesterday? After pondering it for seemingly every waking -- and sleeping! -- hour since it happened, I am thinking that yesterday's Fed move took off the systemic risk of a major financial failure.
If something is happening along these lines, it is all happening quietly behind closed doors. More than one reader suggested that no deal is possible because the Washington Mutual CEO, Kerry Kilinger, does not want to give up his throne and has too high an opinion of himself and the value of the company.
From my perspective this is a deal that has to get done, and if the CEO stands in the way of shareholder, employee, and customer interests he has to go. Time to bring in the corporate raiders -- you listening Carl Icahn; can a deal be done Norman Peltz?Hey Eddie, maybe you could make back the money you lost on Citigroup (NYE: C)! If there were ever a great opportunity this seems like it. The raiders do serve a market purpose.
There are potential buyers waiting in the wings so the raiders could move in friendly like, or do it the hard way, buying in at depressed stock prices, forcing Killinger into submission and doing a quick flip. I think even 'my pal Warren' of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A), a major investor in Wells Fargo, must be doing some heavy duty pondering on the subject.
Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. Disclosure: I own shares of BRK.B and WM.
Giving this further thought and drawing on some of how this could play out from yesterday's post I am wondering why this possible deal is not turning to frenzy. Perhaps all the parties are just playing hard to get. Maybe JPM and WFC have proved to be better navigators than most other large financial companies and that they fear being shipwrecked on the rocks of a Washington Mutual.
If I am Chase management, this deal makes too much sense to let pass. Adding WaMu's west coast footprint advances Chase goals in a fraction of the time it would take to build out a comparable branch network and at great savings. Add in the customers base and service operations minus all the overlapping departments and this is a winner. All that needs to be done is get to the bottom line and do the deal. Bankers should understand the time value of money and get on with it.
The opportunity for Chase is very clear. Wells on the other hand may feel that more organic growth and more methodical steps is the prudent path to continued success. That is perfectly understandable, but might be overly cautious in a very competitive environment. You either move forward or backward, you cannot stay in the same place.
It has been rumored for the past couple of months or so that J. P. Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) has been pondering the acquisition of downtrodden Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) and may have had some preliminary discussions. I have been thinking that Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) might have more than a passing interest too.
I have had business dealings with all three financial companies, including stock ownership, loans, and multiple bank accounts. We have owned JPM stock in the past, but do not currently. We sold most of our WaMu stock last year but still own it in one account. We have never owned Wells, but of the three we would like to get into this one the most, at the right price, of course. I have written extensively about all three companies, so it is with more than a passing interest that I was thinking about M&A issues.
Chase and Wells both could make use of WaMu and gain financially but in different ways. Chase has a much bigger need to establish a presence on the West Coast. It has been expanding over time but its branch system is still weak compared to Wells and the other major banks. With its extensive branch system on the West Coast, WaMu would solve that problem fast.