<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Sequoia Capital wants in on China's wealth explosion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/23/sequoia-capital-wants-in-on-chinas-wealth-explosion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/23/sequoia-capital-wants-in-on-chinas-wealth-explosion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/23/sequoia-capital-wants-in-on-chinas-wealth-explosion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/sequoia.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.sequoiacap.com/">Sequoia Capital</a> is a pioneer of the venture capital space, having invested in such game-changing companies like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). No doubt, they've helped create many millionaires -- and some billionaires. </p>
<p>Well, the same thing is now happening in China, although the wealth management business in the country is still in the early stages.</p>
<p>As a result, Sequoia wants to be a player and has <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=etfNews&amp;storyID=2007-10-23T105407Z_01_SHA349046_RTRIDST_0_SEQUOIA-CHINA-FUND.XML">invested</a> several million for a 20% stake in Noah Private Wealth Management Centre, which is headquartered in Shanghai. With the cash infusion, the firm can expand into other cities as well as add new consultants and perhaps some tech systems.</p>
<p>It's a very savvy move. And, yet again, it should result in a big payday for Sequoia.</p>
<p>Visit <a href="http://www.dealprofiles.com/venture-capital-fundings.htm">DealProfiles.com</a> if you want to check out other recent venture capital fundings.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0761535616?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0761535616">The Complete M&amp;A Handbook</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=0761535616" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" /> and <a href=" http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1932159282?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=mergerforum0f-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1932159282">The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements</a><img width="1" height="1" border="0" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=mergerforum0f-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1932159282" alt="" style="border-style: none ! important; margin: 0px;" />.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/23/sequoia-capital-wants-in-on-chinas-wealth-explosion/">Sequoia Capital wants in on China's wealth explosion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/23/sequoia-capital-wants-in-on-chinas-wealth-explosion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1019862/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/23/sequoia-capital-wants-in-on-chinas-wealth-explosion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>Sequoia Capital</category><category>SequoiaCapital</category><category>Venture Capital</category><category>VentureCapital</category><category>Wealth Management</category><category>WealthManagement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wachovia buys A.G. Edwards]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/wachovia-buys-a-g-edwards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/wachovia-buys-a-g-edwards/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/wachovia-buys-a-g-edwards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a></p><p>In a move to make it one of the largest retail brokerage operations in the country, banking giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">Wachovia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wachovia-corporation/wb/nys">WB</a>) has bought <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/a-g-edwards-holding/age/nys">AG Edwards</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/a-g-edwards-holding/age/nys">AGE</a>). The combined operations will become second only to  <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">Merrill Lynch</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/merrill-lynch-and-co-inc/mer/nys">MER</a>), and ahead of Citigroup's Smith Barney. The new operation should have about 15,000 brokers.</p>
<p>It is easy to say that the move is simply a cost consolidation play. Wachovia says that it can <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118060657840319890.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">take out</a> [subscription required] about $400 million in duplicate costs, which should add to the profitability of the acquired assets.</p>
<p>Wachovia, however, is cleverer than simply making the purchase as a simple earnings play. Retail brokers are huge collectors of assets. The new, combined operation will manage $1.1 trillion.</p>
<p>Rival banks, including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JP Morgan</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jpmorgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys">JPM</a>) do not have networks of brokers anywhere near this scale. That gives Wachovia an edge in wealth and asset management that Citigroup already has. While Wachovia's stock is flat over the last year, Citi is up about 12% and JP Morgan has climbed well over 20%.</p>
<p>Perhaps Wachovia needs a little edge.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/wachovia-buys-a-g-edwards/">Wachovia buys A.G. Edwards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 May 2007 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118060657840319890.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/wachovia-buys-a-g-edwards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/907612/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/wachovia-buys-a-g-edwards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>a.g. edwards</category><category>A.g.Edwards</category><category>age</category><category>bac</category><category>banks</category><category>brokers</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>jpm</category><category>mer</category><category>mergers</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>wachovia</category><category>wb</category><category>wealth management</category><category>WealthManagement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bank of America still not hip with the super wealthy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/04/bank-of-america-still-not-hip-to-the-super-wealthy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/04/bank-of-america-still-not-hip-to-the-super-wealthy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/04/bank-of-america-still-not-hip-to-the-super-wealthy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p>Back in November, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">Bank of America Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys">BAC</a>) agreed to shell out $3.3 billion for <a href="http://www.ustrust.com">U.S. Trust</a>, a bank that focuses on the super wealthy. Only five months later and the deal is already <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117563467979858751.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">going sideways</a> [subscription required]. The CEO of U.S. Trust, Peter Scaturro, is going to leave by summer.
<p>I'm not surprised. When the deal was struck, several friends of mine from U.S. Trust left to go to other private banks. They told me that there would be a culture clash, so why jeopardize clients?</p>
<p>This was exactly the case with contended issues ranging from serious to funny. For example, one dispute was whether to charge clients  ATM fees (to me, if a client has $100 million with your bank, it does sound kind of petty). Another issue was investment selections -- should Bank of America push its own products?</p>
<p>This is not to say that the deal will implode. It's smart that Bank of America is taking quick action, but to get things back on track, it may mean letting U.S. Trust have its own identity - lest more financial advisors and perhaps clients move elsewhere.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/04/bank-of-america-still-not-hip-to-the-super-wealthy/">Bank of America still not hip with the super wealthy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:53:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117563467979858751.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/04/bank-of-america-still-not-hip-to-the-super-wealthy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/867090/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/04/bank-of-america-still-not-hip-to-the-super-wealthy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bac</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>U.S. Trust</category><category>U.s.Trust</category><category>Wealth management</category><category>WealthManagement</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:53:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
