The earnings crunch begins in earnest this coming week, with companies from Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) and PepsiCo Inc. (NYSE: PEP) to Southwest Airlines Co. (NYSE: LUV) and Harley-Davidson Inc. (NYSE: HOG) scheduled to report results for the quarter just ended. But with the ongoing turmoil in the markets, much attention is on the tech and financial sectors. This week will provide plenty to mull over on both counts.
Wall Street expectations for tech stocks are fairly optimistic. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial are looking for chip maker Altera Corp. (NASDAQ: ALTR) and software/service company iGate Corp. (NASDAQ: IGTE) to be the sector's biggest earnings gainers of the week. Altera is expected to report earnings of 30 cents per share (up 33.3% from a year ago) on revenue of $355.1 million. Altera had previously forecast flat sales for the quarter, and shares fell to a 52-week low last week. iGate is expected to report earnings of 14 cents per share (up 42.9%) on revenue of $55.6 million. India-based iGate recently spun off its Mastech consulting services. Shares are down 45.0% in the past three months, and also reached a new 52-week low last week.
San Jose-based Novellus Systems Inc. (NASDAQ: NVLS), on the other hand, is expected to report that net income tumbled 90.4% from a year ago to 4 cents per share, on revenue of $245.6 million. Novellus fell to a 52-week low early last week, and shares are down 44.5% year to date.
This afternoon, Citigroup (NYSE: C) chose to walk away from its discussions to acquire Wachovia (NYSE: WB) but Citi will revive its $60 billion lawsuit against Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC). Meanwhile, with its $122 billion portfolio of toxic option ARM mortgages -- which add gaps in borrowers' monthly payments to the loan principal -- Wachovia may be too radioactive for Wells Fargo to buy.
How did we get here? On September 29th, Citi thought it had a deal to buy Wachovia's banking operations for $2.2 billion -- Citi would absorb the first $42 billion in losses and stick the FDIC with the rest. In exchange, the FDIC would get $12 billion worth of Citi preferred stock. Last Thursday, Wells Fargo announced a deal to buy all of Wachovia for $15 billion without costing the FDIC anything. Citi sued, the FDIC encouraged the three parties to split the baby, and this afternoon Citi decided to withdraw.
But now that the field is open for Wells Fargo, should it continue with the deal or has it learned that Wachovia's bad assets will make the deal too costly? Although Wachovia would give Wells $448 billion in deposits in 3,300 branches in 21 states, it also has $122 billion worth of option ARM mortgages. These mortgages are likely to default in huge numbers over the next few years. That's because the average option ARM holder will see a 63% rise in monthly payments -- for an additional $1,053 per month. With the economy likely to deteriorate, that could burn a big hole in Wells' $48 billion in capital.
Citigroup (NYSE: C) and Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) have reached a temporary cease-fire in the battle to acquireWachovia Corporation (NYSE: WB). Late Monday, federal officials urged the dueling suitors to lay down their legal weapons and attempt a compromise in hopes of avoiding a protracted standoff in court. According to reports, new discussions between the banks and the Fed could lead to a division of Wachovia's assets between the two sparring suitors.
For those of you just joining this banking soap opera in progress: Citigroup agreed last Monday to acquire Wachovia's banking operations, with a little help from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). However, last Friday, Wells Fargo emerged with a financially superior bid to acquire Wachovia in its entirety, which eventually prompted Citigroup to file suit against its rival.
Today's news has sparked heavy volume on Wachovia's October 5 put option. This contract has seen 22,371 contracts cross the tape today on open interest of 57,273. This could indicate that many speculators are betting that the Wells Fargo bid won't go through -- at least, not in its entirety. That bid priced Wachovia at approximately $7 per share, compared to $1 per share under the terms of the Citigroup deal, according to Bloomberg.
Everything is upside down these days. The folks with all the money and multi-million dollar bonuses are begging for a handout on the pretext that the economy will crash if they do not get one. We're not talking money for coffee or a snack, we're talking billions of dollars.
It is crashing anyway, or at least sinking. It is just a matter of what it takes down along the way. Apparently, the folks at the Treasury and Federal Reserve are now convinced that it will be everything.
Sadly, only the federal government was big enough to swallow the problems of American International Group (NYSE: AIG), Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE). Otherwise,those in the know think world financial markets would have crumbled due to the collateral damage, (pun intended).
When I posted Congress is screwing up -- think backstop not bailout!, I was concerned with the psychological effect as much as the financial effect of not approving the funding, but no doubt the people suffering the most are not those who created the pain.
Citigroup (NYSE: C) claims it has gotten a judge to block a potential merger between Wachovia (NYSE: WB) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC). The big New York bank claims it had a deal to snap up WB, and was done wrong.
According to The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), "State Supreme Court Justice Charles Ramos issued the order blocking the sale of Wachovia Corp., which Wells Fargo & Co. had agreed to purchase in a $14.8 billion deal."
The FDIC says it will step in to help resolve the issue. But, the question is "who is served" by the broader implications of the fight. Having three of the nation's largest financial firm in a dispute during the greatest banking crisis in decades would push Wachovia, already troubled, into greater peril while the fight goes on. It could continue for months when fast action may be the only way to keep Wachovia from failing.
The Treasury has already intervened by pushing banks to merge and nationalizing or taking large financial stakes in companies including AIG (NYSE: AIG). It needs to step into the Wachovia situation before the bank gets into such deep trouble that it is not worth buying.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 245wallst.com.
Citigroup (NYSE: C) looks like it's trying to get a breakup fee in exchange for giving up on its deal for Wachovia (NYSE: WB). Citi persuaded a New York judge to extend an exclusivity agreement between Citi and Wachovia -- which prohibited Wachovia from talking to other suitors -- through at least October 10th when the parties are scheduled to meet with the judge. Citi can either offer a higher price than its rival, Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), or it can negotiate a breakup fee to soothe its hurt feelings.
As a reminder, Citi thought it had a deal last Thursday but on Friday that deal evaporated. Citi's deal for Wachovia's banking operations was for $1 a share, or $2.2 billion, and it left Wachovia's brokerage business as a "stub." On Friday, Wells offered much more -- $7 a share, or $15 billion -- for all of Wachovia's operations. Not only that, but the Wells deal was less risky to the FDIC.
That's because the Citi deal required it to take the first $42 billion in Wachovia losses from Wachovia's option ARM mortgages. The FDIC would take the rest of the losses in exchange for Citi preferred stock and warrants worth about $12 billion. By contrast, the Wells deal -- paid for by issuing $20 billion worth of shares -- would leave the FDIC unscathed.
Wachovia (NYSE: WB) changed direction early this morning as it left behind an FDIC maneuvered deal with Citigroup (NYSE: C), deciding to hitch up with the Wells Fargo's stagecoach instead. It was announced they have "signed a definitive agreement for the merger of the two companies including all of Wachovia's banking operations."
Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) last night presented Wachovia with a signed and board-approved offer to purchase Wachovia Corporation as an intact company and without government assistance in a stock-for-stock merger transaction. Under the Wells Fargo proposal, each share of Wachovia common stock will be exchanged for 0.1991 shares of Wells Fargo common stock, representing a value of $7 per share, based on Wells Fargo's closing stock price on Oct. 2, 2008.
The deal valued at about $15 billion, means Wachovia will combine with the only AAA-rated financial institution in the United States.
IN pre-market activity Wahovia and Wells stocks are up while Citi's is down 10%.
Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. Disclosure: I own shares of WFC.
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that not only is Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) surviving the chaos on Wall Street, but it just may be thriving. About the only reason that Wells Fargo has been in the news recently is as a potential buyer of Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM). In fact, as markets tumbled early in the week, Wells Fargo shares reached a new 52-week high of $44.69.
Industry observers say that Wells Fargo's stability is a consequence of its limited exposure to failing mortgages, particularly of the subprime variety. It hasn't escaped unscathed, however. It said it would take charges in the third quarter related to investments in Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM), Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), and Lehman Brothers, but much less than those taken by rivals Wachovia (NYSE: WB) and Washington Mutual.
Wells Fargo has been selectively acquiring assets, mostly in the western U.S., during the economic woes, and is expected to continue to do so. Chairman and former CEO, Richard Kovacevich, is rumored to me looking for one more deal before he retires later this year, according to Reuters. But both Wells Fargo and Washington Mutual have declined to comment on a possible deal. "There's going to be a lot of mergers and acquisitions for either good reasons or because people don't have choices," said Kovacevich, pointing out that Wells Fargo is not the only lender looking to buy.
Wells Fargo shares closed Friday at $39.80 and are up 31.8% year to date. Analysts surveyed by First Call recommend holding Wells Fargo.
"Warren Buffett's holding company, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.B), has been the single greatest investment of our lifetimes," says Alexander Green, noting, "His compounded annual gain from 1966 to 2007 was 21.1% vs. 10.3% or the S&P 500."
In the Oxford Insight, the investment director explains, "It is now time to buy the 'ultimate no-brainer'." Here's his assessment.
"Despite this strong long-term performance, Buffett experienced a rare earnings letdown during the second quarter of this year.
"Although revenue increased 10% to $29.3 billion, insurance related write-downs hurt the company's bottom line. Still, the shortfall was far from cataclysmic. For the quarter, earnings fell 7.6% to $2.88 billion.
"Despite the shortfall, the company still maintains a top-notch credit rating and has over $28 billion in cash, a war chest for the world's greatest investor. How has Buffett been so successful? He takes a disciplined value approach to investing. And he sticks with it.
Nucor Corporation (NYSE: NUE) - This is one of the world leaders in the idea of mini-mills. This smallish steel producer prides itself on running a tight ship, pays a dividend and has a P/E under 9. The steel industry has been volatile in recent years with many mergers and acquisitions. NUE could be a takeover target as the industry continues to consolidate. In the mean time, at Friday's closing price of $51.6, it was paying a 4.05%yield and is near its 52 week low, having dropped from a high of $83.56.
Precision Drilling TR (NYSE: PDS) - This Canadian supplier of gas drilling equipment and manpower is probably the least well known of the companies in this group. It has dropped off its highs with the recent sag in gas prices and may well be a bargain again although not the bargain it was when I posted Chasing Value: Precision Drilling for 10% yield. At Friday's closing price of $21.35 it was paying a 7.1%yield and that is still a wonderful bounty even it the stock only appreciates a little.
Financials have staged an impressive rally from extremely oversold levels," says Kelley Wright, editor of the top-rated IQ Trends, which focuses on high quality, blue chip, dividend-paying stocks. Here's his top long-term buys among banks.
"It is increasingly evident that the banking sector is dividing into two distinct camps; the have's and the have not's. The 'have's' are:
"The impressive rally to date notwithstanding, it still remains to be seen whether another retracement will develop should crude oil, gold and other commodities reverse course.
"A strong rally in these sectors could send the market down again. While Mr. Market can do whatever he pleases, it is highly unusual for stocks to bottom in the summer.
"It would not be imprudent to see what September and October have to offer before anyone begins to talk seriously about the bottom. For investors with an appetite for the financials, however, we would suggest dusting off that old tried and true tactic of dollar cost averaging as a prudent means to establish positions."
Each day, Steven Halpern's TheStockAdvisors.com offers the latest market commentary and favorite investment ideas from the nation's leading financial newsletter advisors.
"The financial sector got a boost after our Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), a buy recommendation in our model income portfolio, reported better-than-expected earnings," notes Jack Adamo.
The editor of Insiders Plus, explains, " While Wells, like virtually every other bank, is dragging its heels a bit on recognizing losses on bad mortgages, there were elements of the report that were unquestionably great.
"In its latest quarterly report, Wells Fargo reported:
• Revenues were up 16% year-over-year. • Average loans were up 18% year-over-year. • Net interest margin was 4.92%, up 23 basis points from Q1 • Net interest income increased 21% year-over-year.
"The fact that Wells is one of the few banks that is still well-capitalized enough to write loans was a large contributor to its increase in revenues.
Back in the early 1990s, the U.S. was mired in a recession and the money center banks were in dire straits. But, of course, it was a great opportunity for investors.
So, are we seeing a repeat? Perhaps so, although, you still need to tread carefully. This is according to a front-page piece in Barron's [a paid publication].
And yes, this week has been particularly encouraging, as seen with a widespread rally in the financials. It certainly helped that there was strength from Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) and JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM). At the same time, the results from Citigroup (NYSE: C) weren't as bad as expected.
By any measure -- such as price-to-book values and P/Es -- the financials look extremely cheap. Besides, these companies are taking quick medicine in terms of write offs. In other words, once financials report next year, the comparisons should look strong.
Something else: the Securities and Exchange Commission has implemented new rules on short selling (regarding 19 financial companies). Ultimately, this may relieve some of the volatility.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says if we get fed support for a housing bottom, we can really turn things around.
If I were at Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) (Cramer's Take), today would be a day where I issued several billion in preferred stock or I issued a multibillion equity offering. Why? Because the deed is done; the shorts panicked and covered and took the stock up where it could now be worth doing a deal.
If things are so great at WFC, why do they have to do a deal? Simple: They have a big increase in nonperformers, and when you have a big increase in nonperformers ,you raise capital. Period.
Yesterday's relief rally was not about housing prices bottoming -- I think that will happen next year, not this year -- it was about getting the shorts. The shorts had had their way all over everything. Suddenly you get this surprise smackdown by Chris Cox of the so-called naked shorts -- it's really not at all about that if these stocks aren't hard to borrow -- and you get a dividend boost, something that shorts don't like to pay.