<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Windows 7 gets a public beta release -- with good reviews]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/microsofts-windows-7-gets-a-public-beta-release-with-good-rev/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/microsofts-windows-7-gets-a-public-beta-release-with-good-rev/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/microsofts-windows-7-gets-a-public-beta-release-with-good-rev/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/msft.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has finally made its Windows 7 operating system available for anybody to download, install and test. The beta release of its flagship software went public over the past weekend to generally good reviews. As Windows Vista seems to have a very negative perception in the market (even with hundreds of millions sold with new PCs), the company's marketing efforts centered around Vista's January 2007 release fell flat.<br /><br />Vista was almost instantly regarded as too slow, too intensive for all but the latest PC technology and its constant pop-up warnings were seen as a huge annoyance. In other words, all the security concerns addressed in Vista -- probably its biggest feature -- were constantly being figuratively spray-painted on customers faces every day. With Windows 7 -- which looks and feels much like Vista -- Microsoft has made extreme advances in speed and responsiveness while making the overall environment easier to navigate and use.<br /><br />Customers don't need to have the latest and greatest PC to run Microsoft's arguably best operating system ever. But still one question remains -- <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/windows-7-review-consensus-its-a-faster-vista-msft">how on earth does Microsoft advertise and market Windows 7</a> -- when it is released -- to assuage Vista-like fears? Customers don't easily forget, and even though Windows 7 just made a significant milestone with a beta software release anyone can download and use, the bigger challenge will be regaining the trust of the computing world once Windows 7 is released. That's probably a harder job than the work required by thousands of software engineers to create the operating system itself.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/microsofts-windows-7-gets-a-public-beta-release-with-good-rev/">Microsoft's Windows 7 gets a public beta release -- with good reviews</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/windows-7-review-consensus-its-a-faster-vista-msft>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/microsofts-windows-7-gets-a-public-beta-release-with-good-rev/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1430290/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/microsofts-windows-7-gets-a-public-beta-release-with-good-rev/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows 7</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>Windows7</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft announces Windows 7 as Vista brand is killed]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/microsoft-announces-windows-7-as-vista-brand-is-killed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/microsoft-announces-windows-7-as-vista-brand-is-killed/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/microsoft-announces-windows-7-as-vista-brand-is-killed/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/windows7_1.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has unveiled the next version of its Windows operating system. The marketing name "Vista" is gone and there apparently is no word to replace it. From all indications, the next version of Windows will be called "Windows 7."<br /><br />Perhaps Microsoft thinks that the lucky number 7 will save it from the tarnish Windows Vista has left behind on the image of Windows. Although the software giant touted Windows Vista as the most secure and user-friendly version of Windows yet, consumers did not embrace it. Through Microsoft's dominance with PC makers, Windows Vista has still continued to be a huge success, shipping on almost all new PCs. Businesses, though, certainly did not welcome Windows Vista readily. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/29/technology/business-computing/29soft.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">Will Windows 7 be any different?</a><br /><br />Using the version number (this Windows is actually version 7), instead of some name, may help Microsoft differentiate it from other operating systems, while reinforcing that there have been six versions of Windows before this new one (hence, it's a tried-and-true product). No release date has been given for Windows 7. Here's a prediction: Microsoft will see Windows 7 as a non-event (as far as initial release) unless it steps up its marketing game soon. If it addresses the perception issues of software crashes, video and audio handling and speed without the latest hardware, Windows 7 may have a chance.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/microsoft-announces-windows-7-as-vista-brand-is-killed/">Microsoft announces Windows 7 as Vista brand is killed</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/29/technology/business-computing/29soft.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/microsoft-announces-windows-7-as-vista-brand-is-killed/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1357272/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/30/microsoft-announces-windows-7-as-vista-brand-is-killed/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows 7</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>Windows7</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's failure with Windows Vista may be only the beginning]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/microsofts-failure-with-windows-vista-may-be-only-the-beginning/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/microsofts-failure-with-windows-vista-may-be-only-the-beginning/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/microsofts-failure-with-windows-vista-may-be-only-the-beginning/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img width="122" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="122" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/vista.jpg" />We've all been hearing it -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) failure to win over consumers and business users with the Windows Vista operating system is causing sales of the older Windows XP operating system to stay afloat. Microsoft doesn't want this, of course. It's true that the software maker has shipped more than 140 million copies of Windows Vista, but since Vista is the default operating system on millions of PCs, it's pretty easy to do that.<br /><br />Some corporate customers, though, have bypassed Windows Vista completely and will wait until the next round. This is Microsoft's Achilles' heel -- some companies won't fix something that isn't broke. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2008/tc20080512_157155.htm?campaign_id=yhoo">even says that</a> "We're considering bypassing Vista and going straight to Windows 7," in reference to Microsoft's next operating system due sometime in the future. Yes, many large companies are indeed taking Windows Vista in -- but it's mostly due to not having much choice with changing out entire computing infrastructures for a global corporation. It takes a visionary IT leader to do that, and those are hard to come by in many cases.<br /><br />And therein lies a big problem for Redmond. If customers aren't excited about its new operating system, why would they <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2008/tc20080512_157155.htm?chan=search">think Windows 7 will be any better</a>? It's hard to fathom Microsoft pouring $5 billion into Vista and being shunned left and right. The software maker's operating system and Office productivity business subsidizes all its other products where it may make little or no money. But what if Windows is destined to become a slow-growth industry? If that's the case, where is Microsoft's growth engine going to come from in 2010? 2012? It's making gobs of money now. Will it last? When its main product underwhelms much of the market, the question has to be asked.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/microsofts-failure-with-windows-vista-may-be-only-the-beginning/">Microsoft's failure with Windows Vista may be only the beginning</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 May 2008 12:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2008/tc20080512_157155.htm?chan=search>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/microsofts-failure-with-windows-vista-may-be-only-the-beginning/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1207385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/28/microsofts-failure-with-windows-vista-may-be-only-the-beginning/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Vista sales</category><category>VistaSales</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>Windows XP</category><category>WindowsVista</category><category>WindowsXp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 12:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Intel Corp is all that AND a bag of nano-chips!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/15/intel-corp-is-all-that-and-a-bag-of-nano-chips/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/15/intel-corp-is-all-that-and-a-bag-of-nano-chips/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/15/intel-corp-is-all-that-and-a-bag-of-nano-chips/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a></p>"The Co-Op of Three," which includes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intc/nys">Intel Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intc/nys">INTC</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aapl/nys">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aapl/nys">AAPL</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/nys">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/msft/nys">MSFT)</a> seem to be surviving the economic downturn. According to <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20080415006500/en">Businesswire</a>: <blockquote>Intel Corporation today announced record first-quarter revenue of $9.7 billion, operating income of $2.1 billion, net income of $1.4 billion and earnings per share (EPS) of 25 cents. </blockquote>The earnings helped to propel the stock higher in after hours trading to the point where Intel is flirting with an almost 8% gain since the close of the regular session. The street was happy not to hear another piece of horrifying news and took notice of how well that Intel held up during this difficult economic environment. Even better, margins were up 4% YOY to a whopping 57% for the full 2008 fiscal reporting period. Much of this has to be a result of the key relationship that Intel has with Apple. <br /><br />Probably one of the greatest technology deals of recent time has got to be the co-op of Apple/Intel/Microsoft. Finally thinking abut the bigger opportunity, these three giants approached the competitive landscape with a resolve to dominate. Since the day Apple's operating system allowed the running of Microsoft's Windows OS, there was no stopping the expansion. Intel's part in all of this was also key. By producing a chip that would help bring these two behemoths together, it has been rising a nice wave of income. No longer does Intel have the same competition as it did only a few years ago. <br /><em></em><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/15/intel-corp-is-all-that-and-a-bag-of-nano-chips/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Intel Corp is all that AND a bag of nano-chips!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/15/intel-corp-is-all-that-and-a-bag-of-nano-chips/">Intel Corp is all that AND a bag of nano-chips!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/15/intel-corp-is-all-that-and-a-bag-of-nano-chips/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1168732/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/15/intel-corp-is-all-that-and-a-bag-of-nano-chips/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple dual boot</category><category>AppleDualBoot</category><category>intel chips</category><category>intel earnings</category><category>IntelChips</category><category>IntelEarnings</category><category>semiconductors</category><category>windows vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Horowitz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's assault on Microsoft's core business]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/apples-assault-on-microsofts-core-business/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/apples-assault-on-microsofts-core-business/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/apples-assault-on-microsofts-core-business/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/macos.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) has really never been down for the count as a company, although it's been on hiatus a couple of times in its 30 plus year history. Never before has the company seen such product and financial success, though, than in the 2001-current period. Under current CEO and co-founder Steve Jobs, the company is a force in the entertainment business along with ramping up its fortunes in the PC business where it started. We won't even mention the hardware business (iPod, iPhone).<br /><br />But the one elusive crown that Jobs would probably love to see shift to his company is the operating system used by PC customers. Now that current Macintosh computers can run <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Windows Vista (or XP) operating system, is Jobs slyly trying to wrestle the operating system of choice crown from his longtime competitor? After all, a Macintosh customer can switch between a full Mac OS (operating system) on his or her PC and Microsoft's Windows with a keyboard press. Use one OS for work-related things and another for -- everything else. Guess which is which? And don't think that's just what Jobs envisions when he's made every single Mac computer being sold capable of running Microsoft's Windows. Perhaps he's <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2008/tc20080410_206881.htm">trying to win a long war with Microsoft</a> on the basis of Apple's cooler-than-cool hardware rather than software?<br /> <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/apples-assault-on-microsofts-core-business/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple's assault on Microsoft's core business</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/apples-assault-on-microsofts-core-business/">Apple's assault on Microsoft's core business</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2008/tc20080410_206881.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/apples-assault-on-microsofts-core-business/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1165351/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/14/apples-assault-on-microsofts-core-business/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>apple</category><category>Apple Mac OS</category><category>AppleMacOs</category><category>Inc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft Corp.</category><category>Microsoft Windows</category><category>MicrosoftCorp.</category><category>MicrosoftWindows</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple market share hard to overlook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/apple-market-share-hard-to-overlook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/apple-market-share-hard-to-overlook/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/apple-market-share-hard-to-overlook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p>CNN <a href="http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/01/01/survey-mac-os-hit-record-73-share-in-december-iphone-up-33/">had a story yesterday</a> showing gains in <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) market share in operating systems. The recent gains in market share must be hard for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) to ignore. It also has to make life harder for Linux and other O/S makers.<br /><br />The data released yesterday, showed that the MacIntel systems had a 4.01% share in December and the Mac OS share was 3.28%, making it a combined 7.3% share in December. While the data shows that Microsoft still dominates with a 91.8% market share, it also shows that it has lost ground for seven of the last eleven months. What is interesting is that out of this 91.8% market share for various Windows O/S sales is that 76.97% is still windows XP and only 10.43% is for Windows Vista.<br /><br />CNN's story <a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=10">covers a survey from</a> Net Applications that uses a sample of visitors to some 40,000 websites operated by its clients rather than a total number of computer systems sold. So there is still some room for interpretation here.<br /><br />Linux was shown as having a 0.63% market share. While that is up 10.5% from the previous 0.57% readings, it shows that Mac truly is the envy of Linux creators. It is also interesting that, at least according to this survey, much of the Windows sales might still be going into Windows XP rather than Windows Vista.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/apple-market-share-hard-to-overlook/">Apple market share hard to overlook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2008/01/01/survey-mac-os-hit-record-73-share-in-december-iphone-up-33/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/apple-market-share-hard-to-overlook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1075265/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/apple-market-share-hard-to-overlook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>inthenews</category><category>linux</category><category>mac</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>windows</category><category>windows vista</category><category>windows xp</category><category>WindowsVista</category><category>WindowsXp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft commits $300 million to consumer advertising 'blitz']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/microsoft-commits-300-million-to-consumer-advertising-blitz/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/microsoft-commits-300-million-to-consumer-advertising-blitz/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/microsoft-commits-300-million-to-consumer-advertising-blitz/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/microsoft_logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) continues to sit on a cash pile worth over $30 billion. What is it going to do with all that money? Continue to develop underwhelming products like Windows Vista? Probably. Take on Google (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) in the internet advertising revenue arena? Of course. Roll out a consumer marketing blitz to make sure the word <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Microsoft</a> continues to be a relevant household name? Surely.<br /><br />Early in 2008, the world's largest software company will begin spending $200 million to $300 million to advertise its wares: the Xbox 360, the newer Zune digital media players, Windows Vista PCs and Windows Mobile.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/microsoft-commits-300-million-to-consumer-advertising-blitz/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft commits $300 million to consumer advertising 'blitz'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/microsoft-commits-300-million-to-consumer-advertising-blitz/">Microsoft commits $300 million to consumer advertising 'blitz'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1066>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/microsoft-commits-300-million-to-consumer-advertising-blitz/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1072466/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/28/microsoft-commits-300-million-to-consumer-advertising-blitz/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft advertising</category><category>MicrosoftAdvertising</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's Vista named #1 tech disapppointment of 2007]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/microsofts-vista-named-1-tech-disapppointment-of-2007/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/microsofts-vista-named-1-tech-disapppointment-of-2007/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/microsofts-vista-named-1-tech-disapppointment-of-2007/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/vista-box.jpg" />Is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Windows Vista computer operating system really that bad? According to<em> PC World</em>, the five-year, $5 billion operating system from the world's largest software company was the tech industry's "worst disappointment of 2007." Ouch.<br /><br />Although a statement like that will surely get readers fired up on both sides, users of the Vista operating system have to ask: <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140583-page,5-c,techindustrytrends/article.html">is it really <em>that bad</em>?</a> Although many of the changes in the Vista operating system are "under the hood" and not really all that recognizable to the average PC user, the brunt of criticism about Windows Vista is the 5 years and nearly $5 billion spent on the operating system. And so the question is asked: <em>is this the best Microsoft could do?</em><br /><br />Sure, the requirements of a PC to run Windows Vista at optimum speeds are quite a bit higher than from the older Windows XP, but that means Windows Vista on recent PCs will perform much slower than on brand-new machines. Is that a fault? <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140583-page,5-c,techindustrytrends/article.html">Depends on your point of view</a>. How about the non-compatibility of older software with the newer Vista operating system? Is that a disappointment? Perhaps, perhaps not. How about the costs for Windows Vista outside of having it installed on a newer PC? $199 and up -- is that too high of a cost for what is being perceived by many customers and reviewers as a "minor upgrade?" What's your take?<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/12/17/vista-named-1-biggest-tech-disappointment-of-2007-by-pc-worl/">Engadget</a>]<br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 12-18-07]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/microsofts-vista-named-1-tech-disapppointment-of-2007/">Microsoft's Vista named #1 tech disapppointment of 2007</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,140583-page,5-c,techindustrytrends/article.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/microsofts-vista-named-1-tech-disapppointment-of-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1065580/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/18/microsofts-vista-named-1-tech-disapppointment-of-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft Vista</category><category>MicrosoftVista</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Vista OS</category><category>VistaOs</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft issues first Windows Vista service pack]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/microsoft-posts-first-service-pack-for-windows-vista/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/microsoft-posts-first-service-pack-for-windows-vista/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/microsoft-posts-first-service-pack-for-windows-vista/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/microsoft-vista.jpg"  alt="Microsoft Vista screen shot" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) released the <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9052738&amp;intsrc=hm_list">first public service pack</a> for its Windows Vista computer operating system Wednesday amid a lack of fanfare by the tech media. Well, from what I saw, anyway. Microsoft's "service pack" is generally regarded as a collection of bug fixes that address certain problems within the software itself, although Microsoft as always downplayed that angle, maintaining that a service pack is more akin to adding new and exciting features more than anything else.<br /><br />Why is this significant? Windows Vista, which the world's largest software company hopes will continue turning its cash-flow machine for many years to come, still needs major acceptance from large businesses and non-consumer segments. Windows Vista has not sold at retail at near the level Microsoft had hoped, although almost every new PC comes with at least the "Basic" version of the operating system.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/microsoft-posts-first-service-pack-for-windows-vista/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft issues first Windows Vista service pack</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/microsoft-posts-first-service-pack-for-windows-vista/">Microsoft issues first Windows Vista service pack</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9052738&amp;intsrc=hm_list>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/microsoft-posts-first-service-pack-for-windows-vista/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1061851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/13/microsoft-posts-first-service-pack-for-windows-vista/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft, Inc.</category><category>Microsoft,Inc.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>upgrades</category><category>Windows</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft Vista sells even if it doesn't work]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/microsoft-msft-vista-sells-even-if-it-doesnt-work/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/microsoft-msft-vista-sells-even-if-it-doesnt-work/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/microsoft-msft-vista-sells-even-if-it-doesnt-work/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p>Imagine a product that many people do not think works well but sells millions of copies. Well, that's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>)'s operating system, Windows Vista.</p>
<p>According to the <em>FT, </em>both business and personal computer users have tried to stick with older versions of the Microsoft OS, Windows XP, but <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/65a96e74-9608-11dc-b7ec-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1">adoption is still good enough</a> to drive outstanding earnings for the world's largest software company. As the newspaper says: "None of this, however, has had any discernible impact on Microsoft's financial fortunes. Many companies buy their software from Microsoft under an arrangement called Software Assurance, which lets them upgrade to new software whenever they like in return for a fixed annual payment."</p>
<p>Perhaps that is what having a monopoly is all about. Even if products are not perfect, they are adopted. Even if companies normally would not make an investment, they are on an "automatic upgrade" program. </p>
<p>It might be nice to think that Linux or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) new OS, Leopard, would get wider adoption, but based on most figures, the Mac has no more than 5% of the global PC market and no open-source desktop program has significant market penetration.<br /></p>
<p>It's good to be king.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at </em><em>247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/microsoft-msft-vista-sells-even-if-it-doesnt-work/">Microsoft Vista sells even if it doesn't work</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/65a96e74-9608-11dc-b7ec-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/microsoft-msft-vista-sells-even-if-it-doesnt-work/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1043279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/microsoft-msft-vista-sells-even-if-it-doesnt-work/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>inthenews</category><category>leopard</category><category>leopard operating system</category><category>LeopardOperatingSystem</category><category>linux</category><category>Mac</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>Vista</category><category>windows vista</category><category>windows xp</category><category>WindowsVista</category><category>WindowsXp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft may nudge Windows XP into 'One Laptop Per Child' project]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/microsoft-may-nudge-windows-xp-into-one-laptop-per-child-proje/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/microsoft-may-nudge-windows-xp-into-one-laptop-per-child-proje/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/microsoft-may-nudge-windows-xp-into-one-laptop-per-child-proje/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/microsoft-msft-logo.jpg" alt="Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) logo" />In a move I thought I'd never see, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) looks to be reversing course a little and trying to get a version of its Windows Vista computer operating system as an option on the $100 "One Laptop Per Child" project spearheaded by MIT to place computers into the hands of as many kids in distressed and poor nations as possible.<br /><br />The project itself is highly admirable, as its goal is to connect kids to a world that expands their horizons and hopefully leads some countries from destitute status to growing, civil communities that are empowered by the knowledge that lives on the internet every day, as well as connecting citizens to one another and students with much-needed tools. <br /><br />In the past, Microsoft has shunned the project, probably since it was slated to use a generic Linux operating system that provides no revenue to anyone -- not exactly a business Microsoft wants to be in. However, it also takes future customers away from Microsoft's revenue prospects in developing countries where PCs may pave the way for computer industry growth in the future. <a href="http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2170209/microsoft-looking-windows-olpc">Talk about a dilemma</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/microsoft-may-nudge-windows-xp-into-one-laptop-per-child-proje/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft may nudge Windows XP into 'One Laptop Per Child' project</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/microsoft-may-nudge-windows-xp-into-one-laptop-per-child-proje/">Microsoft may nudge Windows XP into 'One Laptop Per Child' project</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=65979>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/microsoft-may-nudge-windows-xp-into-one-laptop-per-child-proje/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1026143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/31/microsoft-may-nudge-windows-xp-into-one-laptop-per-child-proje/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$100 laptop</category><category>$100Laptop</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Linux</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MIT laptop</category><category>MitLaptop</category><category>MSFT</category><category>OLPC</category><category>One Laptop Per Child</category><category>OneLaptopPerChild</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>Windows XP</category><category>WindowsVista</category><category>WindowsXp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's (MSFT) first Windows Vista service pack a turning point?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/31/microsofts-msft-first-windows-vista-service-pack-a-turning-po/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/31/microsofts-msft-first-windows-vista-service-pack-a-turning-po/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/31/microsofts-msft-first-windows-vista-service-pack-a-turning-po/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p>When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) first service pack for Windows Vista comes down the chute sometime in 2008, there are indications that <a href="http://news.com.com/Will+update+drive+Vista+use/2100-1016-6205124.html">massive sales of Vista will happen</a> to those corporate customers who have been "waiting in the wings" for this to upgrade. Historically, bigger corporate citizens wait on deploying new operating systems from Microsoft until the first "service pack" is released. These service packs are generally a huge collection of software "bug" fixes that address many issues that are present when a new piece of software launches.<br /><br />Even mighty Microsoft is not immune to this rule: "ship when 85% complete, since you'll never ship on time if you need to get to 100%." That's a repeat of a rule I've heard from many software companies, most of which release product when not complete, as was the case with Windows Vista. After all, hitting a shipping deadline is more important than iron-clad products. Standard rule of thumb here.<br /><br />But will the revenue spigot of Windows Vista sales really see some action once SP1 (service pack 1) is released for Windows Vista next year? From many indications, it will. Support on WindowsXP and Windows 2000 won't last forever, so in effect Microsoft will goad customers into upgrading to Windows Vista (call it standard strong-arm tactics). The release of a 'comforting' initial service pack will ease the security-minded pain of many of these customers, and the non-OEM (original equipment manufacturer), retail sales will finally fall in line to where Microsoft needs them to be. <br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 8-31-07]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/31/microsofts-msft-first-windows-vista-service-pack-a-turning-po/">Microsoft's (MSFT) first Windows Vista service pack a turning point?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/Will+update+drive+Vista+use/2100-1016-6205124.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/31/microsofts-msft-first-windows-vista-service-pack-a-turning-po/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/977646/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/31/microsofts-msft-first-windows-vista-service-pack-a-turning-po/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>MSFT</category><category>Vista service pack</category><category>VistaServicePack</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell (DELL) and Lenovo set up to crash through Windows]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/dell-dell-and-lenovo-set-up-to-crash-through-windows/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/dell-dell-and-lenovo-set-up-to-crash-through-windows/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/dell-dell-and-lenovo-set-up-to-crash-through-windows/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><img width="150" height="NaN" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/logo-dell.jpg" alt="Dell logo" />Here's a scenario which is quite unneeded by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>). In the battle to create profit within the world of personal computers, it must be scary for "number one" when numbers two and three join forces. According to a <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=23071&amp;hed=Dell+Takes+Linux+Overseas">report from Red Herring</a>, that is exactly what is happening, sort of. I haven't heard yet if Microsoft is scared.<br /><br />It would seem that Dell and Lenovo are each gearing up behind the Linux operating system and are preparing to take a flying leap right against Windows. Judging by the considerable negative banter I have encountered regarding a less than stellar Windows Vista inaugural performance, I would say Dell and Lenovo's move comes at a most opportune time.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) has fully embraced Linux, which has had fairly good response from domestic open source enthusiasts. Dell, for its part, is taking the operating system on a worldwide road show.<span class="articleBody"><span style="font-size: 8.5pt; color: black; font-family: Verdana;"> Dell will be hard selling PCs loaded with the Linux operating system in several countries across the pond.<br /><br />For number three PC maker <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lenovo-group-ltd-s-adr/lnvgy/nao">Lenovo</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lenovo-group-ltd-s-adr/lnvgy/nao">LNGVY</a>)'s part, it plans to introduce a broad range of Linux-outfitted laptops, a particularly strong endorsement of the operating system. To me this signals a recognition by manufacturers in the field that Windows Vista is shoddy, expensive and perhaps a bit arrogant, if I can use that word in this context.<br /><br />To be honest I must admit that Dell has lost me as a customer. That is mainly due to Dell's decision to succumb to the wiles of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>). I thank Dell however for giving the nod to Linux, as that may very well be my chosen operating system for the computer I am soon to build. My computer building project shall be introduced on Friday and shall be fully chronicled on our sister site, <a href="http://www.diylife.com/">DIYLife</a>. I'm hoping that our BloggingStocks friends will come share their opinions as I build a computer from scratch. I will be <a href="http://www.diylife.com/bloggers/gary-e-sattler/">soliciting reader input</a> to help complete that project successfully.</span></span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/dell-dell-and-lenovo-set-up-to-crash-through-windows/">Dell (DELL) and Lenovo set up to crash through Windows</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/dell-dell-and-lenovo-set-up-to-crash-through-windows/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/961344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/09/dell-dell-and-lenovo-set-up-to-crash-through-windows/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dell</category><category>Dell Linux</category><category>DellLinux</category><category>DIYLife</category><category>engadget</category><category>featured</category><category>Lenovo</category><category>Lenovo Linux</category><category>LenovoLinux</category><category>Linux</category><category>Linux laptops</category><category>LinuxLaptops</category><category>LNGVY</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Windows Vista: My vote is in]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/windows-vista-my-vote-is-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/windows-vista-my-vote-is-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/windows-vista-my-vote-is-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p>After six months, I finally broke down and retired an older laptop to another use (a "family" PC) and went on the hunt for a newer laptop computer system a few weeks ago. This past weekend, a choice was made and a new slim box was purchased with a new notebook inside, ready to be torn apart the second I walked back in the door at home. Now, I'm no fan of large notebooks, like those with 17" screens or even 15.4" screens. I went with a smaller notebook with a 14.1" screen so that those extended typing sessions would be easier on my lap than a nine-pound monster. Of course, the new system came with Microsoft's (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) newer Windows Vista operating system.<br /><br />Having had a few issues upgrading to Windows Vista in the past few months, I was already leery of the operating system, although it came pre-installed on this new notebook. Having two gigabytes of memory in the new notebook was the bigger factor I had looked for, since having plenty of operating memory is what makes things slick and fast according to the computer experts I had sought out for advice. Although I own Microsoft shares, many of the company's moves irk me; while many delight me (you'll know this from reading my various posts on Microsoft). Was Vista going to be a former or a latter product? Read on.<br /><br />After about three days of installing software and working with this new laptop feverishly to meet deadlines and get things organized this weekend, I do say that Windows Vista is not only pretty but does work very fast and seems very stable. Some of the newer changes from Windows XP are taking a little getting used to, but I can live with it. So far, speed seems much faster than my previous laptop (bought at the end of 2006), although the technical specs are very similar. My verdict on Windows Vista so far is that it is a speedy and workable platform, and every single older application I installed (used previously on Windows XP) worked flawlessly with Vista. Whew.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/windows-vista-my-vote-is-in/">Windows Vista: My vote is in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/default.mspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/windows-vista-my-vote-is-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/946872/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/23/windows-vista-my-vote-is-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>MSFT</category><category>Vista Premium</category><category>Vista Ultimate</category><category>VistaPremium</category><category>VistaUltimate</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft disses Apple: No Windows Vista virtualization on the Mac]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/microsoft-disses-apple-no-windows-vista-virtualization-on-the-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/microsoft-disses-apple-no-windows-vista-virtualization-on-the-m/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/microsoft-disses-apple-no-windows-vista-virtualization-on-the-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/apple-pr-macpro_display.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) does not want Apple Inc.'s (NASDAQ:AAPL) Mac owners to run the Windows Vista operating system on those machines, reversing a decision  made just this week. In the "virtualization" world, Microsoft's current Windows XP computer operating system <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,133196-c,vistalonghorn/article.html">can be run inside of a "virtual software" environment</a> on current Apple MacIntosh computers so that Apple fans can use those stylish Apple systems with Apple software but can still access the Windows environment for certain things (like work email or running Windows-only applications).<br /><br />That arrangement works pretty well for the Windows XP operating system on current (or even older) Mac computers, but Microsoft has now said that it will only allow the bare-bones Windows Vista "Basic" operating system to be used in this virtual Apple Mac environment. Vista versions such as the "Premium" or "Ultimate" won't be allowed to be used with "virtualization" software at all on Apple systems. <br /><br />However, with Apple systems now using Intel CPUs, installing Windows Vista alongside the Apple Mac operating system without this kind of "emulation" is no problem. Basically, Microsoft <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,133196-c,vistalonghorn/article.html">does not want customers</a> using the nicer versions of Windows Vista on older Apple Mac machines made before Steve Jobs decided to use Intel chips in all Apple Mac systems.<br /><br />Will this hurt the adoption of Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system growth? Probably not, but this move signals that Microsoft would like most Windows Vista customers to use non-Apple machines, like the commodity PCs from vendors like Dell, HP and Acer. Surprised? I'm not.<br /><br />[Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 6-22-07]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/microsoft-disses-apple-no-windows-vista-virtualization-on-the-m/">Microsoft disses Apple: No Windows Vista virtualization on the Mac</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,133196-c,vistalonghorn/article.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/microsoft-disses-apple-no-windows-vista-virtualization-on-the-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/924104/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/microsoft-disses-apple-no-windows-vista-virtualization-on-the-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Apple Mac</category><category>AppleMac</category><category>Mac Parallels</category><category>MacParallels</category><category>Windows virtualization</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVirtualization</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Dell have any love for Windows Vista?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/does-dell-have-any-love-for-windows-vista/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/does-dell-have-any-love-for-windows-vista/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/does-dell-have-any-love-for-windows-vista/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/dell-logo-759205.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Dell Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">DELL</a>) falling out of love with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>)'s Windows Vista? First off, the company decided to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/windows-vista-is-essentially-the-same-as-windows-xp-to-some">bring back Windows XP</a> as an option for an installed computer-operating system on its PCs. Then, in response to popular demand, the computer maker begins <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/13/will-dell-ever-sell-linux-pcs-like-some-customers-want/">selling Ubuntu Linux</a> as an installable option instead of Windows at all.<br /><br />Then, in the midst of Microsoft shelling out half a billion to market and promote Windows Vista, the computer maker patches together what appears to be a slapstick promotional gadget to "entice" new Dell customers to see how Windows Vista is a superior operating system. After <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=430">watching the video linked from here</a>, I was left amazed -- this is the best a leading computer manufacturer can do to promote the product that comes installed on virtually all of its new PCs? What does Microsoft think about this half-hearted attempt at promotion of its flagship operating system?<br /><br />Does Dell just not like Windows Vista or something? One could certainly get that impression, although I believe it is far from the truth. All the signals here have lined up to form a somewhat inconsistent angle from Dell's end on just what it wants to be. The company needs to be everything to every customer perhaps, which can be a recipe for disaster or can allow it to survive in short-term fashion (just not long-term). Entering <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Wal-Mart Stores</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WMT</a>)just muddies the issue further and seems like a quick-fix experiment for now, but at least Dell's stance on operating systems offered is still a tad confusing.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/does-dell-have-any-love-for-windows-vista/">Does Dell have any love for Windows Vista?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 May 2007 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=430>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/does-dell-have-any-love-for-windows-vista/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/906797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/31/does-dell-have-any-love-for-windows-vista/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dell</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Windows Vista supports millions of devices; customers cheer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/windows-vista-supports-millions-of-devices-customers-cheer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/windows-vista-supports-millions-of-devices-customers-cheer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/windows-vista-supports-millions-of-devices-customers-cheer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>)'s Windows Vista operating system has now sold over 40 million copies since its launch at the end of January, according to company co-founder Bill Gates. That's all well and good, but then I've heard of many people stating that an upgrade to the new operating system <a href="http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/16/microsoft-claims-vista-now-support-19-million-devices/">ended in extreme frustration</a>, with this writer included. My attempt to upgrade to the new operating system was met by one largely frustrating two-hour process. Result? I went back to Windows XP and returned to using an older Mac system that performs flawlessly.<br /><br />One of the complaints that comes out of the Vista-bashing camp quite regularly is device compatibility. Hardware like printers, webcams and video cards may not work with the new Vista operating system yet, which causes computer owners with newer (but not that compatible) systems to curse to no end. After all, some folks would love to pay Microsoft for its new bright and shiny software, but not when it won't work with every piece of hardware they own and like.<br /><br />But, a new operating system should not be expected to work with everything <a href="http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/16/microsoft-claims-vista-now-support-19-million-devices/">immediately after release</a>, right? Consumers don't understand this in most cases -- to them, it's install Windows Vista and everything should work like it did with the older Windows XP.To that end, Microsoft has said that Windows Vista <a href="http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/16/microsoft-claims-vista-now-support-19-million-devices/">now supports 1.9 million devices</a>. That's a gain from 300,000 since Vista was launched just in January. This proves to me that Windows Vista was launched not complete (but stable), which was a business decision I am sure Microsoft made with all data at hand. Can I fault Microsoft for it? No -- since almost every other company releases software not at 100%. If companies did, most software would never get shipped at all, right?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/windows-vista-supports-millions-of-devices-customers-cheer/">Windows Vista supports millions of devices; customers cheer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/16/microsoft-claims-vista-now-support-19-million-devices/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/windows-vista-supports-millions-of-devices-customers-cheer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898169/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/windows-vista-supports-millions-of-devices-customers-cheer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gates: Windows Vista sells 40 million copies so far]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/gates-windows-vista-sells-40-million-copies-so-far/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/gates-windows-vista-sells-40-million-copies-so-far/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/gates-windows-vista-sells-40-million-copies-so-far/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p>As Doug <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/microsoft-vista-sales-top-40-million/">wrote about a few days ago</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.'s</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) Bill Gates proclaimed this week that the software maker had sold 40 million copies of Windows Vista so far. This is above estimates and apparently impressed the audience at the WinHEC conference, a hardware developer's meeting where Gates was speaking. Is this an impressive number? It's above estimated, after all. But considering the number of OEM (original equipment manufacturer) PCs that have shipped from Dell, HP, Acer, Lenovo and others, this number is not all that surprising.<br /><br />Like most new Microsoft operating system introductions, most of the sales will come from shipments on new PCs, not retail sales. As long as consumers and businesses <a href="http://news.com.com/Gates+40+million+Vista+copies+sold/2100-1016_3-6183890.html?tag=nefd.pop">continue buying PCs and laptops</a>, Windows Vista sales will continue to rise. It's true as Gates said that the number of shipped Windows Vista licenses is more than the total install base of Windows' largest competitors, but then again, Microsoft has some high-level agreements with almost every computer manufacturer in the world. No other software manufacturer even comes close.<br /><br />Want some more numbers around the Microsoft operating ecosystem? Gates referenced a study during his speech that concluded with the fact that for every dollar Microsoft makes off Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 (coming this fall), other technology companies will take in an additional $18. The IDC study Gates was riffing on also said that a bucket of $120 billion in revenue was up for the companies that support Microsoft's products with products of their own. <em><br /></em><br /><em>Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 5-17-07.<br /></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/gates-windows-vista-sells-40-million-copies-so-far/">Gates: Windows Vista sells 40 million copies so far</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 17 May 2007 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/Gates+40+million+Vista+copies+sold/2100-1016_3-6183890.html?tag=nefd.pop>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/gates-windows-vista-sells-40-million-copies-so-far/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/897490/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/17/gates-windows-vista-sells-40-million-copies-so-far/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Windows Vista demo crashes at Best Buy -- and at home]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy-and-at-home/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy-and-at-home/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy-and-at-home/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews"><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/winxppro.png" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Microsoft  Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) spent over five years and invested billions of dollars in the new Windows Vista operating system -- and the thing still <a href="http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/06/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy/">crashed during a demonstration</a> inside a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/best-buy-co-inc/bby/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Best Buy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/best-buy-co-inc/bby/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BBY</a>) store recently. <br />After chuckling a bit, I came to a conclusion that's based on my own personal experience: Vista is not worth the effort or money at this point in time, no matter how good it looks on paper or to the eyes with that "Aero" interface.<br /><br />Here's my dilemma: recently, I used a copy of Vista Premium to install onto a main working HP laptop system I use regularly. The laptop was about five months old and was sold with the "Windows Vista Capable" logo on it. <br /><br />The system has more than enough memory, processing power and even the graphics used inside are more than capable for a full Windows Vista experience. This is why I chose it -- so that it could be upgraded later. Windows XP worked perfectly on this laptop, so it was not an unrealistic expectation to think Windows Vista would work well, even though many Windows errors are not due to Microsoft's operating system itself (although that's the general impression customers get).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy-and-at-home/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Windows Vista demo crashes at Best Buy -- and at home</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy-and-at-home/">Windows Vista demo crashes at Best Buy -- and at home</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 May 2007 14:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://vista.blorge.com/2007/05/06/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy-and-at-home/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/890312/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/windows-vista-demo-crashes-at-best-buy-and-at-home/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 14:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[PC makers loading up computers with too much junk]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/pc-makers-loading-up-computers-with-too-much-junk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/pc-makers-loading-up-computers-with-too-much-junk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/pc-makers-loading-up-computers-with-too-much-junk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p>Although I think Wall Street Journal tech columnist Walt Mossberg sometimes misses the mark, he's right on the money when he complains about the software gunk that comes preloaded on <a href="http://ptech.wsj.com/archive/ptech-20070405.html">almost every new Windows PC</a>.</p>
<p> This is stuff the consumer never asked for that ends up slowing a new PC down while littering the menus and other areas with so much garbage that the average consumer ends up pulling their virtual hair out.<br /><br />Why does so much software come pre-installed on that new, shiny PC? Well, part of the cost of that PC is likely being subsidized by those software makers that pay to have their products installed on the machine. The hope is that a new PC owner will buy the "full version" of that software. </p>
<p>This makes the cost of the PC go down a bit, but as Walt says, it also makes the informed computer buyer become a "digital maintenance man wading through annoying and confusing chores" in order to <a href="http://ptech.wsj.com/archive/ptech-20070405.html">get all that stuff uninstalled or out of the way</a>. You know, so you can <strong><em>actually enjoy</em></strong> using that new computer without a plethora of roadblocks.<br /><br />The first thing I do when purchasing a new Windows PC is start uninstalling all of the preloaded software. Not only does this free up valuable hard drive space, it gets the "muck" out of the way and allows the machine -- which I paid for -- to be the way I want it. Ideally, I'd love to buy a Windows PC and have nothing installed but the Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) software.</p>
<p> That is virtually impossible these days, so I'll spend about an hour getting rid of all the trial software (virus scanners, online services, photo programs, etc.) to get my machine to as close to bare as possible. Then, I make it all mine (they way I want it). Have similar experiences? Tell me about them.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20070406/075614.shtml">techdirt</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/pc-makers-loading-up-computers-with-too-much-junk/">PC makers loading up computers with too much junk</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://ptech.wsj.com/archive/ptech-20070405.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/pc-makers-loading-up-computers-with-too-much-junk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/869068/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/09/pc-makers-loading-up-computers-with-too-much-junk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>New Windows PC</category><category>NewWindowsPc</category><category>trial software</category><category>TrialSoftware</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>Walt Mossberg</category><category>WaltMossberg</category><category>Windows PC</category><category>Windows Vista</category><category>WindowsPc</category><category>WindowsVista</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
