<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Closing Bell: The Market Advances Without Conviction (BA, YHOO)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/closing-bell-the-market-advances-without-conviction-ba-yhoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/closing-bell-the-market-advances-without-conviction-ba-yhoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/closing-bell-the-market-advances-without-conviction-ba-yhoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg" />The market ignored intervention on behalf of Japan to drive down the value of the yen and an anemic improvement in August industrial output, which was only up .2%, to post a very modest gain for the day. <br />
<br />
Today's closing bell numbers:<br />
<br />
Dow Jones 	10,572.73 	+46.24 	(0.44%) <br />
S&amp;P 500 	1,125.07 	+3.97 	(0.35%) <br />
Nasdaq 	2,301.32 	+11.55 	(0.50%) <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/closing-bell-the-market-advances-without-conviction-ba-yhoo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Closing Bell: The Market Advances Without Conviction (BA, YHOO)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/closing-bell-the-market-advances-without-conviction-ba-yhoo/">Closing Bell: The Market Advances Without Conviction (BA, YHOO)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/closing-bell-the-market-advances-without-conviction-ba-yhoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19635404/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/15/closing-bell-the-market-advances-without-conviction-ba-yhoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airbus</category><category>Alibaba Group</category><category>BA</category><category>japan</category><category>world trade organization</category><category>yen</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Global trade growth seen continuing despite WTO setback]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/global-trade-growth-seen-continuing-despite-wto-setback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/global-trade-growth-seen-continuing-despite-wto-setback/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/global-trade-growth-seen-continuing-despite-wto-setback/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p>Just call it 'two steps forward, one step back' for the global trade talks. <br /><br />The collapse of the <a href="http://www.wto.org/">World Trade Organization's</a> trade talks this week without an agreement is a setback, economists contacted by BloggingStocks agreed, but it is not likely likely to prevent international trade from growing in 2009. <br /><br />The nine-day talks in Geneva -- aimed at completing the Doha Round -- collapsed Tuesday after the United States and the European Union could not reach an agreement with China and India on what constituted acceptable tariffs for food imports, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/31/business/worldbusiness/31trade.html?hp"><em>The New York Times </em>reported Wednesday.</a> The U.S. and E.U. say China and India wanted to impose prohibitively high tariffs. China and India counter that they were insisting on safeguard rules to protect their food supplies.<br /><br />Economist Glen Langan told BloggingStocks the elimination of food import tariffs would have resulted in more-efficient deployment of resources, and, ultimately, lower food prices for consumer around the world, along with increased the increased commerce that trade brings. "The failure of the talks is a real loss for consumers in China, India and in the U.S. and Europe," Langan said. "It will also really hurt low cost food producers in Brazil, Argentina, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. Ultimately, China and India will have to relent, or the west may begin to complain about free trade conditions for manufacturing and services. That manufacturing free trade policy has been the source of a considerable amount of China's and India's economic growth."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/global-trade-growth-seen-continuing-despite-wto-setback/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Global trade growth seen continuing despite WTO setback</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/global-trade-growth-seen-continuing-despite-wto-setback/">Global trade growth seen continuing despite WTO setback</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/global-trade-growth-seen-continuing-despite-wto-setback/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1273327/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/global-trade-growth-seen-continuing-despite-wto-setback/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Argentina</category><category>Australia</category><category>Brazil</category><category>China</category><category>Doha</category><category>Doha Round</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>exports</category><category>gdp</category><category>global economy</category><category>globalization</category><category>imports</category><category>India</category><category>inthenews</category><category>New Zealand</category><category>protectionism</category><category>South Africa</category><category>tariffs</category><category>trade</category><category>United States</category><category>US</category><category>World Trade Organization</category><category>WTO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why you might still think twice about voting Democrat]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/why-you-might-still-think-twice-about-voting-democrat/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/why-you-might-still-think-twice-about-voting-democrat/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/why-you-might-still-think-twice-about-voting-democrat/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/workspace/" rel="tag">Workspace</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><p>Today's Democratic Party is <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">not</span><span style="FONT-STYLE: italic"> </span>the Democratic Party as your grandfather knew it. If you think that the Democrats are all about working peoples' needs and how best to serve them, you may wish to think again. The days when the powerful labor unions were backed by legislation-wielding hot-dogs who were ready to step into the gap to protect the working class in wages, safety, and working conditions have faded away. In fact, I'm of the mind that the decline actually began way back with the disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa and the slow ugly death of that empire once known as the American steel industry.</p>
<p>Fast forward to NAFTA and GATT, and you'll find two of the most damaging pieces of paperwork that the American economy has ever endured. Do I need to mention the one name most closely associated with both of those documents from the American side? I'll give you a hint, his ex is now looking to plant her feisty butt in the oval office.</p>
<p>Take a look, if you dare, at the link I have provided. It's an article called <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070604/editors">"Dems Sell Out on Trade"</a> and surprisingly enough it's written from a slightly Democratic perspective. Read it, digest it, and then look at the past three decades in light of it. No, today's Democratic Party is <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">not </span>the Democratic Party that your grandpa supported. The new breed means business . . . in a stinkingly non-American, global sense.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/why-you-might-still-think-twice-about-voting-democrat/">Why you might still think twice about voting Democrat</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 21:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070604/editors>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/why-you-might-still-think-twice-about-voting-democrat/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/900194/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/why-you-might-still-think-twice-about-voting-democrat/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>deficit</category><category>Democrat</category><category>GATT</category><category>globalization</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>HillaryClinton</category><category>NAFTA</category><category>tariffs</category><category>taxes</category><category>trade</category><category>World Trade Organization</category><category>WorldTradeOrganization</category><category>WTO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 21:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Should there be a deflation index?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dai/" rel="tag">Daimler (DAI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a></p><p>As I watch the retreating of prices on a selection of consumer goods I wonder where this is all going. Housing prices have dropped nationwide. Consumer electronics are sliding downward. The "big three", Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F), Daimler Chrysler (NYSE: DCX) and General Motors (NYSE: GM) are reducing sticker shock to the customer. Sure, these are nice things relative to the bottom line as consumers, but is this the signal of hard times to come? If I was seeing an overall increase of incomes at the same time as these price declines I'd be more excited about the "recession". Although the government says we're earning more, at ground level I just don't see it.</p>
<p>No, what I think is happening is the rising of a monster that I have feared for quite some time. We have lost such a significant share of the world's manufacturing output relative to our population that our economy is adjusting itself to compensate for the losses of those well-paying jobs. Don't let Washington fool you. Just because they say employment numbers are good doesn't mean you can sleep better tonight. When it takes three employees in the warehouse at a retail outlet like Best Buy (NYSE: BBY) to earn the same income as one dude used to earn building cars or vacuum cleaners, that's a sad state of affairs. Those three warehouse workers won't be buying flat screen TVs. The auto worker could have bought a couple of them.</p>
<p>Will our government wake up and send word to the World Trade Organization that we're starting to get a bit edgy over here? Maybe I'm wrong, but I think the WTO is a major obstacle to our success. They hold us to marketing price structures that are unrealistic by instituting tariffs and controls that strangle real free trade. At the same time, they refuse to have a hand in requiring the implementation of solid requirements regarding the compensation and treatment of the world's work force. Add in the inability of our own governments, both federal and state, to control spending and the continued upward spiral of out-of-control taxation and you have an economy that is being held hostage to the whims of a limited and scary percentage of power mongers. What can we as wage earners and consumers do about all this?</p>
<p>I'm open for suggestions.</p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/">Should there be a deflation index?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/720869/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/19/should-there-be-a-deflation-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BestBuy</category><category>consumer prices</category><category>ConsumerPrices</category><category>DaimlerChrysler</category><category>FordMotorCo.</category><category>recession</category><category>World Trade Organization</category><category>WorldTradeOrganization</category><category>WTO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
