<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Was WWE's Drop Today a Buying Opportunity?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/06/was-wwes-drop-today-a-buying-opportunity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/06/was-wwes-drop-today-a-buying-opportunity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/06/was-wwes-drop-today-a-buying-opportunity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/wwe-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Wow, what a trading day! World Wrestling Entertainment (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>), like many stocks, was being punished because of macro fears in the global marketplace. At one point, my intraday screen showed a drop all the way down to $12.86. Did that really happen? Is a rerun of the kind of price action we saw during the credit crisis in the offing?</p>
<p>I just don't know; I do know, however, that you better be willing to take advantage of some of these buying opportunities (assuming an opportunity passes your own test of due diligence, it goes without saying). Looking at WWE, I have to believe today may have been a good time to start a position (if you are a long-term believer and didn't add to an already existing position, you should have!).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/06/was-wwes-drop-today-a-buying-opportunity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Was WWE's Drop Today a Buying Opportunity?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/06/was-wwes-drop-today-a-buying-opportunity/">Was WWE's Drop Today a Buying Opportunity?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 May 2010 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/wweand-x00ae-reports-2010-first-quarter-results/rfid326580332/?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/06/was-wwes-drop-today-a-buying-opportunity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19467767/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/06/was-wwes-drop-today-a-buying-opportunity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment's Q4: Lower GAAP Profit, Higher Cash Flow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/world-wrestling-entertainments-q4-lower-gaap-profit-higher-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/world-wrestling-entertainments-q4-lower-gaap-profit-higher-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/world-wrestling-entertainments-q4-lower-gaap-profit-higher-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/wwe-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />World Wrestling Entertainment's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) story hasn't changed too much, in my opinion. It's holding up pretty well with its business model, but as far as unambiguous growth is concerned, management remains in a challenged position.</p>
<p>WWE released <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/wweand-x00ae-reports-2009-fourth-quarter-results/rfid298480156?channel=pf">Q4 earnings</a> to the market on Thursday, and the results were rather mediocre for the most part. Per-share profit dropped three pennies to 15 cents. Revenues saw a modest decline. Excluding items, adjusted operating income increased 9% on a dollar basis.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/world-wrestling-entertainments-q4-lower-gaap-profit-higher-ca/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment's Q4: Lower GAAP Profit, Higher Cash Flow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/world-wrestling-entertainments-q4-lower-gaap-profit-higher-ca/">World Wrestling Entertainment's Q4: Lower GAAP Profit, Higher Cash Flow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/wweand-x00ae-reports-2009-fourth-quarter-results/rfid298480156?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/world-wrestling-entertainments-q4-lower-gaap-profit-higher-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19355111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/12/world-wrestling-entertainments-q4-lower-gaap-profit-higher-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will a New Storyline Bolster WWE's Fortunes?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/will-a-new-storyline-bolster-wwes-fortunes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/will-a-new-storyline-bolster-wwes-fortunes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/will-a-new-storyline-bolster-wwes-fortunes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/wwe-logo-240.jpg" />World Wrestling Entertainment (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) is a fun stock to keep tabs on. Not only is it linked to some crazy (and I mean that in a good way) content, but it sports one heck of a yield. As of this writing, WWE is yielding over 9%. Pretty cool, huh?</p>
<p>Yet, at the same time, investors worry over the company's programming. They have to; WWE lives and breathes by the excitement quotient of its various plots and skirmishes. Wall Street wants to see the ratings go as high as possible, and for that to happen, WWE has to deliver.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/will-a-new-storyline-bolster-wwes-fortunes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will a New Storyline Bolster WWE's Fortunes?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/will-a-new-storyline-bolster-wwes-fortunes/">Will a New Storyline Bolster WWE's Fortunes?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.suntimes.com/sports/wrestling/1947639,CST-SPT-bjack20.article>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/will-a-new-storyline-bolster-wwes-fortunes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19291930/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/23/will-a-new-storyline-bolster-wwes-fortunes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bret hart</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>wrestlemania</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment Q3 results exceed expectations]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>)'s stock jumped Thursday after the market took a look at the company's <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/wweand-x00ae-reports-2009-third-quarter-results/rfid267813916?channel=pf">Q3 data</a>. Overall revenues didn't see much of an increase, but earnings per share rose over 70% to 12 cents. Driving this incredible growth rate was a cut in gross costs. Analysts were betting on 10 cents in per-share profit, according to <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=wwe">Earnings.com</a>. </p>
<p>Did WWE deserve a pop of 7% during yesterday's trading session? Some of the excitement was certainly justified. It's obviously a positive thing to see management acting so diligently when it comes to costs. Of course, there was an increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses during the quarter, so there is still room for improvement (the nine-month table did show a decrease in this line, to be fair). </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment Q3 results exceed expectations</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/">World Wrestling Entertainment Q3 results exceed expectations</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/wweand-x00ae-reports-2009-third-quarter-results/rfid267813916?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19225495/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-a-buy-after-q3-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>featured</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment should be just fine after management change]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" alt="" /> Linda McMahon, as I'm sure most investors are aware, is no longer the CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). Her husband, Vincent K. McMahon, now occupies the role. The reason? Political ambitions. She wants to be a senator. Now, here's <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN1730963520090917?sp=true">the question</a>: should shareholders be worried about the change? </p>
<p>My opinion? Investors shouldn't worry at all. Well, perhaps that's overstating it a little, but I think there are a few things media observers should keep in mind. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment should be just fine after management change</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/">World Wrestling Entertainment should be just fine after management change</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN1730963520090917?sp=true>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19169022/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/22/world-wrestling-entertainment-should-be-just-fine-after-manageme/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>linda mcmahon</category><category>LindaMcmahon</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment's new media ambition ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" alt="" />There's some exciting news in the world of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). Looks like Vince McMahon wants to expand his media empire via entering the world of basic cable. Yes, he's already on basic cable, of course, but now he's intent on literally creating his very own wrestling channel.</p>
<p>According to a blog at the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/08/wwes-vince-mcmahon-wants-to-launch-cable-network.html"><em>Los Angeles Times</em> website</a>, McMahon would be interested in launching a dedicated WWE channel within two years. This makes complete sense on several levels. First, WWE has a lot of content in its library that needs to be monetized; WWE's existing video-on-demand product already leverages the company's portfolio, but exposure to ad-supported cable would be helpful. Second, it could boost the profile of the WWE brand. Third, it might help long-term growth; without question, WWE needs to do something to compensate for the falloff it is seen in pay-per-view buys. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment's new media ambition </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/">World Wrestling Entertainment's new media ambition </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2009/08/wwes-vince-mcmahon-wants-to-launch-cable-network.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19147493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/01/world-wrestling-entertainments-new-media-ambition/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>usa network</category><category>UsaNetwork</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment increases profit and cash flow in Q2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-increases-profit-and-cash-flow-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-increases-profit-and-cash-flow-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-increases-profit-and-cash-flow-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" alt="" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) walked to the ring with its <a href="http://corporate.wwe.com/documents/PressReleaseQ209FINAL0805Clean.pdf">second quarter results</a> on Thursday. WWE increased revenues by 7%. Earnings per share came in at 27 cents per share as opposed to 10 cents per share in the year-ago quarter. In the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/">first quarter</a> of this year, WWE reported lower sales and income. </p>
<p><em>Wrestlemania XXV</em> hulked up the quarter, it must be kept in mind. And that's great. However, don't think WWE is out of the woods yet when it comes to pay-per-view performance. For instance, both the <em>Backlash</em> and <em>Judgment Day</em> events saw decreases in buy rates. Any <em>Wrestlemania</em> event is a given in terms of popularity, but you really want to see every event at least maintain a flat growth rate. Remember: <em>Wrestlemania</em> comes only once a year, not every quarter. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-increases-profit-and-cash-flow-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment increases profit and cash flow in Q2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-increases-profit-and-cash-flow-in/">World Wrestling Entertainment increases profit and cash flow in Q2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-increases-profit-and-cash-flow-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19122041/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-increases-profit-and-cash-flow-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pay per view</category><category>PayPerView</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>wrestlemania</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wwe/" rel="tag">World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></div>
<p>Last week, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) reported its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-reports-2009-first-quarter-results/rfid211295084">Q1 results</a>. Above all, investors interested in this business look at one thing: cash flow. Why? Take a look at WWE's dividend yield. </p>
<p>As of Tuesday's close, the stock was yielding almost 13%! That's high. And a high dividend yield often indicates that a dividend cut may be in the offing -- the theory being that if the yield were sustainable, then buyers would rush in, and their activities would eventually lower the yield by driving the price higher. </p>
<p>Well, WWE hasn't had a great time of it when it comes to cash flow. I found this out when I examined the company's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/">third quarter</a>. Net cash from operations, unfortunately, has been overpowered at times by the dividend obligation. In fact, according to the Q4 report (<a href="http://corporate.wwe.com/news/documents/PRESSRELEASEFINAL2-24-09.pdf">pdf file)</a>, operational cash flow for 2008 dropped significantly to roughly $36 million, and the dividend obligation was over $80 million. </p>
<p>And that was before capital investments. That's sort of like the Undertaker throwing Mankind off the top of a steel cage. In other words, it's not pretty, folks. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/">World Wrestling Entertainment: How was the cash flow in Q1?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 13 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-reports-2009-first-quarter-results/rfid211295084>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://corporate.wwe.com/news/documents/PRESSRELEASEFINAL2-24-09.pdf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/12/thanks-for-nothing-disney/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://finance.aol.com/glossary/free%20cash%20flow>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1544385/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/13/world-wrestling-entertainment-how-was-the-cash-flow-in-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>mankind</category><category>television</category><category>undertaker</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA['Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas"><img hspace="4" height="297" width="200" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/200px-monsters-vs-aliens-poster.jpg" />DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nas">DWA</a>) has done it again. The studio's new computer cartoon, <em>Monsters Vs. Aliens</em>, which was distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), debuted in the top slot over the weekend at domestic multiplexes. According to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo estimates</a> at the time of this writing, the film earned around $58 million. I think we all expected the performance in terms of rank, but I have to say that I thought the film would have taken in north of $60 million. <br /></p>
<p>If you look at this very useful <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=dwanimation.htm">reference</a>, you'll see that the opening for <em>Monsters</em> is relatively decent when compared to other DreamWorks Animation openings. But since both <em>Kung Fu Panda</em> and <em>Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa</em> had both hit the $60 million mark, I thought <em>Monsters</em> could do the same. An element to keep in mind is the timing. This is the first time that the studio opened one of its animated projects in March since <em>The Road to El Dorado</em>, and that one doesn't really count since it wasn't a CGI affair. So from that standpoint, perhaps this is a big victory.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/">'Monsters Vs. Aliens' is a dream for DreamWorks while '12 Rounds' is a nightmare for WWE </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1502494/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/30/monsters-vs-aliens-is-a-dream-for-dreamworks-while-12-rounds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12 rounds</category><category>12Rounds</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Cena</category><category>JohnCena</category><category>kung fu panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>madagascar escape 2 africa</category><category>MadagascarEscape2Africa</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/wwe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Don't tell me you haven't noticed the rise in value of shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). The recent rally in the stock is supremely impressive. The shares closed on Thursday at $12.08. The 52-week low of $8.76 was made back in November of last year. If you look at a one-month chart, you'll see that it's been nothing but straight-up action. </p>
<p>Yes, my friends, the stock is Hulking up! (I love it when Hulk Hogan does that routine.) Of course, by the time this is published, maybe the shares will have experienced a sell-off, but for now, the shares are hot.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/">World Wrestling Entertainment's stock has been hot - is John Cena responsible?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1499787/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/world-wrestling-entertainments-stock-has-been-hot-is-john-ce/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>12 rounds</category><category>12Rounds</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Hulk Hogan</category><category>HulkHogan</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Cena</category><category>JohnCena</category><category>LGF</category><category>lions gate entertainment</category><category>LionsGateEntertainment</category><category>See No Evil</category><category>SeeNoEvil</category><category>stone cold steve austin</category><category>StoneColdSteveAustin</category><category>the condemned</category><category>TheCondemned</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>vince mcmahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney's 'Race to Witch Mountain' loses its magic]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/disneys-race-to-witch-mountain-loses-its-magic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/disneys-race-to-witch-mountain-loses-its-magic/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/disneys-race-to-witch-mountain-loses-its-magic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walt-disney-company-dis-logo.jpg" />Last week at this time, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/">I was reporting</a> on the success of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) <em>Race to Witch Mountain</em>, starring Dwayne Johnson, an actor who used to be a full-time grappler known as The Rock for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). The film opened in the number-one position, <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=racetowitchmountain.htm">taking in $24.4 million</a>. </p>
<p>Well, I'm sorry to say now that the project might not have the best legs in the business. It dropped to fourth place this time around after grossing an amount that, as of early estimates, is over 46% less than what it grossed in its debut weekend.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/disneys-race-to-witch-mountain-loses-its-magic/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Disney's 'Race to Witch Mountain' loses its magic</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/disneys-race-to-witch-mountain-loses-its-magic/">Disney's 'Race to Witch Mountain' loses its magic</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i9ab6ed8bb3577213b9b4ac2b751c4920>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/disneys-race-to-witch-mountain-loses-its-magic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1495021/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/23/disneys-race-to-witch-mountain-loses-its-magic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Dreamworks</category><category>duplicity</category><category>dwayne johnson</category><category>DwayneJohnson</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>i love you man</category><category>ILoveYouMan</category><category>Knowing</category><category>nicolas cage</category><category>NicolasCage</category><category>race to witch mountain</category><category>RaceToWitchMountain</category><category>summit entertainment</category><category>SummitEntertainment</category><category>The Rock</category><category>TheRock</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>Watchmen</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dwayne Johnson and Disney conjure up a hit with 'Race to Witch Mountain']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/walt-disney-company-dis-logo.jpg" />Well, it looks like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) redeemed itself after the awful <em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/02/the-jonas-brothers-fail-at-the-box-office-will-they-survive/">Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert</a></em> disappointment. </p>
<p>According to early estimates at <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>, the Mouse's new movie, <em>Race to Witch Mountain</em>, was the number-one flick at domestic theaters this past weekend. The remake of the classic Disney film <em>Escape to Witch Mountain</em> took in roughly $25 million. </p>
<p>That was more than enough to send <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Watchmen</em> to second place. The superhero project made around $18 million. Coming in third was another remake, although this is no family movie, I can tell you that. Distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures, <em>The Last House on the Left</em>, a grim horror film full of terror and torture, took in $14 million. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dwayne Johnson and Disney conjure up a hit with 'Race to Witch Mountain'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/">Dwayne Johnson and Disney conjure up a hit with 'Race to Witch Mountain'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1488808/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/16/dwayne-johnson-and-disney-conjure-up-a-hit-with-race-to-witch-m/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dwayne johnson</category><category>DwayneJohnson</category><category>escape to witch mountain</category><category>EscapeToWitchMountain</category><category>featured</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jonas brothers</category><category>jonas brothers the 3d concert experience</category><category>JonasBrothers</category><category>JonasBrothersThe3dConcertExperience</category><category>last house on the left</category><category>LastHouseOnTheLeft</category><category>race to witch mountain</category><category>RaceToWitchMountain</category><category>The Rock</category><category>TheRock</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>world wrestling entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WWE: Again, it's all about the cash flow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) reported results for the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-reports-2008-third-quarter-results/rfid155793690">third quarter</a>, and by just about all accounts, things were tough. Revenues were flat at $108.8 million. Net income on a per-share basis, however, dropped almost 42% to $0.07. Talk about getting slammed to the mat! But the really bad aspect was the cash-flow statement. This has been a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/">constant theme</a> as of late. The company's operational cash flow declined massively during the nine-month period, coming in at $17.7 million. Know how much money was paid out in dividends? Try almost $61 million. That's probably why WWE's stock yields over 10%.
<p>So what's the problem here? A couple things. First, costs need to be controlled (the press release does mention this issue, as well as a desire to be more careful when it comes to capital expenditures). Second, CEO Linda McMahon has to get fans excited about wrestling again. If you look at the buy rates for the pay-per-view events, you'll notice they've been declining. I think one thing that WWE must do is figure out a way to make its secondary pay-per-view shows a must-purchase item for the part of the fan base that falls outside of the hardcore wrestling viewer but doesn't exactly reach the realm of the casual audience. If the company can bring shows like <em>The Great American Bash</em> and <em>Unforgiven</em> up to the level of a <em>SummerSlam</em>, then the company will really be on a growth track. </p>
<p><em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>WWE: Again, it's all about the cash flow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/">WWE: Again, it's all about the cash flow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-reports-2008-third-quarter-results/rfid155793690>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-coo-change/rfid155793600?channel=%22pf%22>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1364783/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/07/wwe-again-its-all-about-the-cash-flow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>Donna Goldsmith</category><category>DonnaGoldsmith</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Linda McMahon</category><category>LindaMcmahon</category><category>Mike Sileck</category><category>MikeSileck</category><category>pay-per-view</category><category>Summerslam</category><category>Unforgiven</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment: Long-term play for dividend fans?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nct/" rel="tag">Newcastle Investment (NCT)</a></p><p>I was sent a press release today concerning <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>). It was one that I had missed. WWE, as many may know, has a pretty high dividend yield. Problem is, in this trading environment, some high dividend yields have proven to be predictors of disaster. As an example, were you trading <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newcastle-investment-corporation/nct/nys">Newcastle Investment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newcastle-investment-corporation/nct/nys">NCT</a>) by any chance? Then you know what I mean. For many stocks, high yields are merely a ticket to Dividend-Cut City. Or how about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/">General Electric Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/">GE</a>)? That company didn't cut its dividend, but management indicates that there won't be a raise in the dividend this year. It's been many, many years since GE refused to raise its quarterly payout. In many sad ways, it could be considered a cut. </p>
<p>Yet, here's something <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwe-maintains-high-dividend-yield/rfid144729091?channel=%22pf%22">encouraging</a> for investors in WWE. Management at the world's most famous wrestling institution has come out swinging, eager to alleviate the fears of shaken investors in a world bloodied and bruised by the financial crisis (hey, maybe that could be a new wrestling character, Financial Crisis, and his finishing move could be the Mark-to-Market). According to the press release, WWE intends on keeping its current quarterly payout for the long term. The very high yield of 9%, as far as execs are concerned, is doable. </p>
<p>What are income investors to make of this? Well, in my opinion, long-term investors might do well with WWE stock. Consider that we are not dealing with a financial company. Like GE, WWE didn't say it intends to raise the payout. But WWE has increased the dividend quite a bit since it first initiated the shareholder-friendly initiative. In this environment, the ability to keep a high yield is something that could be valuable. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment: Long-term play for dividend fans?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/">World Wrestling Entertainment: Long-term play for dividend fans?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1330110/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/01/world-wrestling-entertainment-long-term-play-for-dividend-fans/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>Linda McMahon</category><category>LindaMcmahon</category><category>NCT</category><category>Newcastle Investment</category><category>NewcastleInvestment</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment: Management brought B-team to Q2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg" />World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) entered a match it apparently was unprepared to win this time around. I'm talking about a match for the most coveted prize on Wall Street: The Earnings Championship Belt. </p>
<p>During the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/rfid127916289">second quarter</a>, WWE had to lie down for the count. The top line saw a depressing decrease of nearly 6%, coming in at $129.7 million. The bottom line saw no growth whatsoever, as WWE earned $0.10 per diluted share, the same amount that was earned in the year-ago period. According to <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/briefing/_a/world-wrestling-misses-by-002-beats-on/rfid127916971">Briefing.com</a>, this represents a miss of two pennies. One thing that must be noted is that the big <em>Wrestlemania</em> event took place during the second quarter last year and the first quarter this year. </p>
<p>Of course, one of the most fascinating elements of WWE's stock is its incredible yield. Right now, the company is trading at a yield greater than 9%. Considering WWE's massive brand power in sports entertainment, and the fact that wrestling should always be with us, that sounds like a great deal, correct? It could be over the long term. </p>
<p>However, a look at the cash-flow statement does not offer a lot of encouragement, to be honest. Operational cash flow declined massively, dropping 94% during the six-month period. And for both the quarterly period and the half-year period, there was negative free cash flow by management's own calculation. So, as can be seen, servicing a dividend with no free cash flow is like Rey Mysterio trying to body slam Andre the Giant. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment: Management brought B-team to Q2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/">World Wrestling Entertainment: Management brought B-team to Q2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/rfid127916289>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/briefing/_a/world-wrestling-misses-by-002-beats-on/rfid127916971>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1277217/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/06/world-wrestling-entertainment-management-brought-b-team-to-q2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>Linda McMahon</category><category>LindaMcmahon</category><category>movie business</category><category>MovieBusiness</category><category>Rey Mysterio</category><category>ReyMysterio</category><category>See No Evil</category><category>SeeNoEvil</category><category>The Condemned</category><category>The Marine</category><category>TheCondemned</category><category>TheMarine</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>wrestlemania</category><category>wrestling</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[WWE needs to make Vince McMahon's giveaway more exciting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p>I recently wrote about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">World Wrestling Entertainment</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) million-dollar <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/">giveaway plans</a>. This is the scheme that sees the Mr. McMahon character reward viewers who register at the company's website with portions of his fortune. He calls them up on the phone during WWE's <em>RAW </em>program and doles out various sums; according to this <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-fans-win-rawr-money-on-usa-networks/rfid111052037">press release</a>, one winner got $200,000, while another player received $125,000. One poor hapless soul won $2! Remember, Mr. McMahon is an evil guy. </p>
<p>I tuned in to see how the contest would be presented and to get some sense of how it was received. It seemed a bit awkward and slow at times. A few in the audience screamed that they were bored. Personally, I thought it was goofy fun to see Vince McMahon calling people to hand out some of his money and enjoyed it for what it was. But WWE will need to optimize the segment and try to make it more exciting, as I don't think it came off exactly as it wanted. McMahon is supposed to keep handing out $1 million a week for an unspecified time period, so the company will have more chances to improve the presentation. </p>
<p>WWE wants to really juice the ratings for the <em>RAW </em>brand, hoping that viewers beyond the hardcore fan base will stop watching networks owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys">CBS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) long enough to sample the spectacle of the WWE product (of course, GE's NBC Universal owns the USA cable network, which <em>RAW</em> runs on). McMahon is smart to be trying something like this since WWE will be working its way up to perhaps one of its biggest pay-per-view opportunities ever: Wrestlemania 25. With a milestone like that coming, the company has a chance of really expanding its brand equity and setting the stage for long-term growth. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>WWE needs to make Vince McMahon's giveaway more exciting</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/">WWE needs to make Vince McMahon's giveaway more exciting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-fans-win-rawr-money-on-usa-networks/rfid111052037>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226230/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/wwe-needs-to-make-vince-mcmahons-giveaway-more-exciting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monday night raw</category><category>MondayNightRaw</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>Wrestlemania</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What the heck happened to Playboy (PLA)'s stock?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/what-the-heck-happened-to-playboy-pla-s-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/what-the-heck-happened-to-playboy-pla-s-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/what-the-heck-happened-to-playboy-pla-s-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" />I have to admit, I completely missed this move. I usually keep tabs on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>)'s stock action. Not very close tabs, truthfully, but I do check in somewhat regularly. I was shocked when I saw how low the stock had recently dropped. Back in the first week of May, when I reported on the adult-entertainment entity's earnings, the stock was trading around $7.25. As of Thursday's close, the stock was priced at $5.85 per share. The 52-week low now stands at $5.52. TheStreet.com recently cursed the stock to <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/s/tsc-ratings-upgrades-downgrades-playboy/newsanalysis/ratings/10419165.html?puc=_aol&amp;cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed&amp;puc=aol&amp;">sell status</a>.</p>
<p>That's a steep move in such a short period of time, and now I have to ask myself: Is the stock a trade? I mean, a thought that immediately came to my mind upon seeing the current share price was that the Wall Street movers and shakers may have overshot on the selling here. <br /></p>
<p>But then, other thoughts came to mind such as how badly the company has been doing. Also, as Zac Bissonnette recently pointed out, pornography <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/pornography-not-so-recession-proof-after-all/">isn't really recession-proof</a> at all in this age of the Internet. Seekers of adult entertainment have seen their wallets benefit from the proliferation of the clip culture as expressed by sites like YouTube and its more porn-friendly counterparts.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/what-the-heck-happened-to-playboy-pla-s-stock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What the heck happened to Playboy (PLA)'s stock?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/what-the-heck-happened-to-playboy-pla-s-stock/">What the heck happened to Playboy (PLA)'s stock?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/s/tsc-ratings-upgrades-downgrades-playboy/newsanalysis/ratings/10419165.html?puc=_aol&amp;cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed&amp;puc=aol&amp;>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/what-the-heck-happened-to-playboy-pla-s-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1217242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/06/what-the-heck-happened-to-playboy-pla-s-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adult entertainment</category><category>AdultEntertainment</category><category>featured</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>Timothy Sykes</category><category>TimothySykes</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Vince McMahon bribing viewers to watch wrestling?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/wwelogo.jpg" />World Wrestling Entertainment</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) Vincent Kennedy McMahon wants more viewers for his <em>Monday Night Raw </em>wrestling extravaganza. In fact, he's so keen on growing ratings that he's willing to spend his own money to keep viewers tuned. How much? Try $1 million. </p>
<p>In a terse <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/mcmahons-million-dollar-maniatm/rfid109479367">press release</a> concerning a promotional sweepstakes, WWE says that <em>Raw </em>viewers can register at the company's Web site and then watch for codes during the program beginning next Monday. People will be competing to win a portion of a $1 million giveaway each week for some unspecified time period. Now, before you think me naive, I made sure to see if this was legitimate, and from the looks of things it is. According to this <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5indhctjJFAtfOVHroIOX_lG5-_GwD912E9D00">AP article</a>, McMahon will really be doing this. According to other reports, the June 9<em> Raw</em> will reveal the details of the promotion. The $1 million will come from McMahon's own fortune (again, from what I understand, this is real). </p>
<p>There's no question as to why this is being done. WWE wants eyeballs. Ratings have been challenged as of late, according to that AP piece. I think giving away $1 million is exciting, and as far as a marketing campaign goes, it should boost ratings. Only problem is, I'd have to imagine that long-term shareholders aren't happy that this kind of gimmick has to be employed. Is wrestling becoming boring to people? Are they in need of other reasons to watch? Well, the answer would seem to be a resounding "yes." </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Vince McMahon bribing viewers to watch wrestling?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/">Is Vince McMahon bribing viewers to watch wrestling?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/mcmahons-million-dollar-maniatm/rfid109479367>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1216014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/05/is-vince-mcmahon-bribing-viewers-to-watch-wrestling/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>GE</category><category>Monday Night Raw</category><category>MondayNightRaw</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy near 52-week low - will Christie Hefner ever turn things around?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/playboy-near-52-week-low-will-christie-hefner-ever-turn-thing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/playboy-near-52-week-low-will-christie-hefner-ever-turn-thing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/playboy-near-52-week-low-will-christie-hefner-ever-turn-thing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" alt="" />Playboy</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) shares are hovering near a 52-week low as I write this. The catalyst, you ask? The sexy company reported some dismal <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/playboy-enterprises-inc-reports-first/rfid100300569">earnings</a> this week. Net sales decreased 8%. The net loss came in at $0.09 per diluted share versus positive net income of $0.04 per diluted share in the previous year's quarter. </p>
<p>Even if you look at some of the adjustments, the Playboy story just isn't a seductive one. And according to a Reuters <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idINN0646171220080506?rpc=44">article</a>, expectations were for a profit of $0.06 per share after adjustments. The net income of each Playboy operating division headed in a downward direction. And publishing, well -- that's been the saddest segment of all for a while now.</p>
<p>I have a question for Christie Hefner: Are you serious about turning your father's company around? Seriously. I've been giving Playboy the benefit of the doubt now for quite some time, and I'm not sure I can do that anymore. I want to, believe me; I'm a guy who has always been in love with the Playboy lifestyle. And, remember, the invitation is always open if you need me to come over to the Mansion to help you generate some new marketing strategies. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/playboy-near-52-week-low-will-christie-hefner-ever-turn-thing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy near 52-week low - will Christie Hefner ever turn things around?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/playboy-near-52-week-low-will-christie-hefner-ever-turn-thing/">Playboy near 52-week low - will Christie Hefner ever turn things around?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/playboy-near-52-week-low-will-christie-hefner-ever-turn-thing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1189114/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/playboy-near-52-week-low-will-christie-hefner-ever-turn-thing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Christie Hefner</category><category>ChristieHefner</category><category>featured</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[World Wrestling Entertainment shows growth in earnings, but what about cash flow?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/wwelogo.jpg"  alt="" />World Wrestling Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc-united-states/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) stepped into the Wall Street ring on Tuesday -- and lost. The company's stock dropped about 8% at closing on the Q1 <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-reports-2008-first-quarter-results/rfid100311407">earnings release</a> (it did recover a bit during the after-hours session). I'd probably call this profit-taking, although there was one thing about the earnings report that I didn't like: free cash flow. <br /></p>
<p><br />Let me say first, though, that revenues increased more than 50% to $162.6 million, and that earnings per share rose almost 29% to 27 cents (according to Briefing.com, this matched expectations). This is excellent growth, and it shows the resilience of wrestling as an entertainment brand; sure, many on Wall Street may not take the company seriously, but they're wrong. I enjoyed, by the way, that WWE increased the buy-rates for its <em>Royal Rumble </em>and <em>No Way Out </em>pay-per-view events. Pay-per-view is a very vital part of WWE's operations, in my opinion. And let's not forget a big driver for the quarter -- <em>Wrestlemania XXIV --</em> which brought in more than million buys. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, free cash tumbled off the mat, decreasing 77%. And, no, the amount generated did not cover the generous dividend that WWE pays. I would really like to see free cash flow do well every quarter since WWE has been a steady dividend-increaser over its time as a public company. Management must focus on the cash-flow statement and make it a priority. <br /></p>
<p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>World Wrestling Entertainment shows growth in earnings, but what about cash flow?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/">World Wrestling Entertainment shows growth in earnings, but what about cash flow?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 May 2008 10:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/wwer-reports-2008-first-quarter-results/rfid100311407>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1188128/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/07/world-wrestling-entertainment-shows-growth-in-earnings-but-what/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>featured</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>Vince McMahon</category><category>VinceMcmahon</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><category>WorldWrestlingEntertainment</category><category>Wrestlemania</category><category>WWE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:47:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
