<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Sony's 'Angels &amp; Demons' triumphs over Viacom's 'Star Trek' ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/sonys-angels-and-demons-triumphs-over-viacoms-star-trek/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/sonys-angels-and-demons-triumphs-over-viacoms-star-trek/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/sonys-angels-and-demons-triumphs-over-viacoms-star-trek/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/angelsanddemons_11.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Last week's number-one picture, <em>Star Trek</em>, had to yield to a newcomer this week. <em>Angels &amp; Demons</em>, distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), took the top spot this past weekend at domestic theaters, according to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>. The movie is credited with $48 million as of early estimates. </p>
<p><em>Trek</em>, distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), came in second with $43 million. And I have to say, although I wasn't impressed with the movie's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/beam-up-more-box-office-bucks-scotty/">box-office debut</a>, I thought that the second weekend was relatively strong. I expected a better than 50% drop for its sophomore frame. As of current data, <em>Trek</em> only shed roughly 40% of its opening gross. Good job (I still think the opening was weak, though). The film is close to the $150 million mark. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/sonys-angels-and-demons-triumphs-over-viacoms-star-trek/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sony's 'Angels &amp; Demons' triumphs over Viacom's 'Star Trek' </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/sonys-angels-and-demons-triumphs-over-viacoms-star-trek/">Sony's 'Angels &amp; Demons' triumphs over Viacom's 'Star Trek' </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/sonys-angels-and-demons-triumphs-over-viacoms-star-trek/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1548205/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/18/sonys-angels-and-demons-triumphs-over-viacoms-star-trek/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>angels and demons</category><category>AngelsAndDemons</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>featured</category><category>ghosts of girlfriends past</category><category>GhostsOfGirlfriendsPast</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>ron howard</category><category>RonHoward</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Star Trek</category><category>StarTrek</category><category>the da vinci code</category><category>TheDaVinciCode</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>Tom Hanks</category><category>TomHanks</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>viacom</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Beam up more box-office bucks, Scotty!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/beam-up-more-box-office-bucks-scotty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/beam-up-more-box-office-bucks-scotty/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/beam-up-more-box-office-bucks-scotty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys"><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/star-trek-movie.jpg" alt="" />Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) came out on top this past weekend with its new <em>Star Trek</em> film. According to early estimates from <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a>, the picture made roughly $72 million over the three-day period at domestic theaters. </p>
<p>If you include some early screenings, the total is closer to $76 million. <em>Trek</em> beat out such projects as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</em>, which came in second place, and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Ghosts of Girlfriends Past</em>, which took spot number three.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/beam-up-more-box-office-bucks-scotty/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Beam up more box-office bucks, Scotty!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/beam-up-more-box-office-bucks-scotty/">Beam up more box-office bucks, Scotty!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 11 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/beam-up-more-box-office-bucks-scotty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1541879/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/11/beam-up-more-box-office-bucks-scotty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>featured</category><category>ghosts of girlfriends past</category><category>GhostsOfGirlfriendsPast</category><category>jj abrams</category><category>JjAbrams</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>star trek</category><category>StarTrek</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>trekkers</category><category>trekkies</category><category>TWX</category><category>via</category><category>viacom</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Was 'Wolverine's' box office that great?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/wolverine-origins-fl.jpg" alt="" />It was a great weekend for comic book fans. First, Saturday was <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2009/05/free-comic-book-day-2009-support-your-local-heroes.html">Free Comic Book Day</a>. I hope you were able to celebrate (I did!). Second, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) <em>X-Men Origins: Wolverine</em>, licensed to and distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>), opened on Friday. </p>
<p>As expected, it completely annihilated the competition (I would have said <em>clawed</em> the competition, but I'm sure that pun has already been done to death by now) at the domestic box office over the weekend.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Was 'Wolverine's' box office that great?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/">Was 'Wolverine's' box office that great?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2009/05/free-comic-book-day-2009-support-your-local-heroes.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1534845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/04/was-wolverines-box-office-that-great/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>17 again</category><category>17Again</category><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>comic book</category><category>ComicBook</category><category>dreamworks animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>ghosts of girlfriends past</category><category>GhostsOfGirlfriendsPast</category><category>h1n1</category><category>Marvel</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>obsessed</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Stephen King</category><category>StephenKing</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hasbro meets expectations in tough Q1]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hasbro-meets-expectations-in-tough-q1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hasbro-meets-expectations-in-tough-q1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hasbro-meets-expectations-in-tough-q1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/has/" rel="tag">Hasbro Inc (HAS)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/hasbro-has-logo.jpg" alt="" />Hasbro</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hasbro-inc/has/nys">HAS</a>), a toymaker that competes with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">Mattel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">MAT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jakks-pacific-inc/jakk/nas">JAKKS Pacific</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jakks-pacific-inc/jakk/nas">JAKK</a>), reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/hasbro-reports-first-quarter-results/rfid205651457?channel=pf">results</a> for the first quarter on Monday. They weren't that spectacular. No big earnings beat here. Net sales were down 6%, even excluding the effect of currency translation. Net income dropped 44% to $0.14 per share. According to this <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=has">source</a>, that number unfortunately merely met Wall Street expectations.</p>
<p>Of course, I suppose things could have been worse. Hasbro could have missed expectations by a mile. In this kind of economy, we probably should be glad that a company whose products can easily be cut from any discretionary family budget at least was able to keep up with prevailing wisdom. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hasbro-meets-expectations-in-tough-q1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hasbro meets expectations in tough Q1</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hasbro-meets-expectations-in-tough-q1/">Hasbro meets expectations in tough Q1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/hasbro-reports-first-quarter-results/rfid205651457?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/11/should-you-be-looking-at-hasbro/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?client=cb&amp;ticker=has>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hasbro-meets-expectations-in-tough-q1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1522453/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/20/hasbro-meets-expectations-in-tough-q1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>G.I. Joe</category><category>G.i.Joe</category><category>HAS</category><category>Hasbro</category><category>JAKK</category><category>jakks pacific</category><category>JakksPacific</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MAT</category><category>Mattel</category><category>MVL</category><category>news corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>toys</category><category>Transformers</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Marvel worthy of an upgrade?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) is a great company. It's got a lot of cool characters in its vast comic book portfolio. Spider-Man, Hulk, X-Men, you know them all. And it's a fun stock to both invest in and trade. It's a more direct play on movies than a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) or a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) is. I've made money on Marvel in the past. I don't currently own it, so I was pretty interested when I heard that <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Upgrades/Wedbush+Morgan+Upgrades+Marvel+Entertainment+%28MVL%29+to+Buy+on+Strong+Earnings+Power/4404992.html">Wedbush Morgan</a> issued an upgrade this week. </p>
<p>Wedbush Morgan basically said that the market is undervaluing Marvel's potential. It sees a price target of $31. I myself think Marvel will break $30 yet again, but the problem I have is with sentiment. Exactly how will the market react to Marvel's shares this year? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Marvel worthy of an upgrade?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/">Is Marvel worthy of an upgrade?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.streetinsider.com/Upgrades/Wedbush+Morgan+Upgrades+Marvel+Entertainment+(MVL)+to+Buy+on+Strong+Earnings+Power/4404992.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1463679/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/is-marvel-worthy-of-an-upgrade/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Thor</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>wedbush morgan</category><category>WedbushMorgan</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p>So, I'm still <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/ironman_head.jpg" />trying to figure out a strategy for the coming year for my portfolio. Stocks are starting to feel a little better to me, but I'm very, very cautious about timing in terms of trades. For instance, I'd rather wait until we see a substantial pullback from the recent rally before taking some of my cash on the sidelines and putting it to work. But I've got two ideas in the movie sector that I'm looking at: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel Entertainment</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>).
<p>First off, both are great companies. No, not every move they make is perfect (example: Marvel still can't properly monetize its Incredible Hulk property with a decent film). But both stocks have held up relatively well, in my opinion, during the financial implosion. Both stocks are also below their respective 52-week high's and above their respective 52-week low's. That's not a bad position to be in (although I should point out that I generally would like to get these two around their 52-week low's). But which stock has the edge?</p>
<p>Well, Marvel's shares have been strong lately. According to the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">AOL quote</a> at the time of this writing, Marvel is in the green in all time frames (year-to-date, one-month, one-year, etc.). DreamWorks Animation is in the red in a couple spots, but for the most part, it's been performing somewhat similarly to Marvel. I don't really see that much of a difference in terms of strength. Plus, both are arguably essentially equal in terms of valuation (at least in my opinion).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/">DreamWorks Animation versus Marvel Entertainment: Which one is a buy?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1421014/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/07/dreamworks-animation-versus-marvel-entertainment-which-one-is-a/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>film</category><category>Incredible Hulk</category><category>IncredibleHulk</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel Entertainment</category><category>MarvelEntertainment</category><category>monsters vs. aliens</category><category>MonstersVs.Aliens</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>Thor</category><category>x-men origins wolverine</category><category>X-menOriginsWolverine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:14:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
