<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Marvel's 'Hulk' came in at number one, but was it a box-office bomb?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/mvl-marvel-entertainment-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) movie <em>The Incredible Hulk </em>was incredibly disappointing (to me at least). No, I'm not talking about the quality of the movie. I didn't actually see it. But <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a> is reporting that it has grossed an estimated $54.5 million at domestic theaters over the weekend. While that was good enough for first place, it wasn't good enough for shareholders. The movie bombed, plain and simple. </p>
<p>Why am I being so hard on a number-one movie? It's not so difficult to understand. The awful <em>Hulk </em>movie that was released back in 2003 grossed $62.1 million in its opening weekend. There's no way to spin this. We've had five years of inflation between that terrible flick and this new iteration. Simply put, it should have grossed at least $65/$70 million, especially on the heels of <em>Iron Man</em>. I'm a shareholder of Marvel, and I don't like the fact that the success of Marvel's first movie of the summer didn't synergize a little better with the angry green guy.</p>
<p>Focusing on the positive, Marvel was able to beat <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) and its <em>Kung Fu Panda</em> project. The cartoon took in about $34 million and came in second. M. Night Shyamalan's <em>The Happening</em>, distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>), did okay by coming in third with a gross of around $30 million. Some analysts thought that the horror flick would do a little bit less than that number. Personally, I thought it should have come in second place considering Shyamalan's name, but I guess people aren't as excited as they used to be about his exercises in cinematic twists (the fact that it was rated R also inhibited its blockbuster potential). <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) Adam Sandler comedy <em>You Don't Mess with the Zohan </em>did in fact get messed with yet again, dropping two spots to fourth place, grossing about $16 million. I've heard bad reviews on this one. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) and <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em> were daring enough for fifth place. Everyone's favorite archaeologist has now breached the $275 million level. Great to see a favorite character of mine from the past doing so well. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Marvel's 'Hulk' came in at number one, but was it a box-office bomb?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/">Marvel's 'Hulk' came in at number one, but was it a box-office bomb?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1225658/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/marvels-hulk-came-in-at-number-one-but-was-it-a-box-office-b/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>Dreamworks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>featured</category><category>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTheKingdomOfTheCrystalSkull</category><category>Kung Fu Panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>m. night shyamalan</category><category>M.NightShyamalan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>NWS</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>The Happening</category><category>The Incredible Hulk</category><category>TheHappening</category><category>TheIncredibleHulk</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>You Dont Mess with the Zohan</category><category>YouDontMessWithTheZohan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Zohan is no match for the Panda]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mvl/" rel="tag">Marvel Entertainment (MVL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/dreamworkslogo.jpg"  alt="" />The weekend domestic box-office results weren't too shocking. I pretty much knew that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DreamWorks Animation</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dreamworks-animation-skg-inc/dwa/nys">DWA</a>) <em>Kung Fu Panda </em>would kick its way to the top (I wonder how many writers will be using that phrase when covering the movie this week). But when I saw that <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/">Boxofficemojo</a> estimated a $60 million gross for the cartoon, I actually was disappointed. These days, a $60 million haul in the summertime doesn't seem impressive. I thought <em>Panda </em>might have been worth a little more. But, after checking some of the historical openings for other DreamWorks pictures, I realized that <em>Panda </em>did all right. It actually was one of the bigger debuts for the studio. </p>
<p>Even though the cartoon seemed a lock for first place, I thought <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) <em>You Don't Mess with the Zohan</em> project would be a close second. At a $40 million estimated gross, it wasn't. I don't know if you can mess with Zohan or not, but you apparently can mess with Adam Sandler and best his star power. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>) <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em> is still going strong in third place. It has crossed the $250 million level, and it is headed for $300 million. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) <em>Sex and the City</em>, however, has lost a great deal of thunder, dropping from first to fourth place in its second weekend at the multiplexes. It is just shy of the $100 million mark. Is<em> Sex</em> nothing more than an opening-weekend phenomenon? It seems that way, but we'll have to see how steep the drops are in subsequent weekends. </p>
<p><em>The Strangers</em>, from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) Universal Pictures, dropped from third to fifth place in its second weekend, a rather predictable event for a horror movie. At a $37 million total gross so far, <em>The Strangers </em>won't go down as a huge triumph, but you've got to love the profit potential for this low-budget flick that succeeded in counterprogramming its way to summertime glory. Universal obviously thought the film's concept possessed a chance to score a $100 million total haul since it placed the movie against the big guns of this busy period, but that's okay, the try was worth it in this case. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Zohan is no match for the Panda</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/">The Zohan is no match for the Panda</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=dwanimation.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1218948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/09/the-zohan-is-no-match-for-the-panda/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>box office</category><category>BoxOffice</category><category>DreamWorks Animation</category><category>DreamworksAnimation</category><category>DWA</category><category>indiana jones and th...</category><category>IndianaJonesAndTh...</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Kung Fu Panda</category><category>KungFuPanda</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>Sex and the City</category><category>SexAndTheCity</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><category>You dont mess with the Zohan</category><category>YouDontMessWithTheZohan</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
