<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon.com gets a better search engine -- by another provider]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/amazon-com-gets-a-better-search-engine-by-another-provider/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/amazon-com-gets-a-better-search-engine-by-another-provider/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/amazon-com-gets-a-better-search-engine-by-another-provider/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/a9_logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />When you're searching Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN) for a product or for loads of products, are you in tune with the shipping situation? Most customers are. In fact, Amazon's "Prime" program, which has seen decent success, is built around one single premise -- getting the consumer to subscribe to an annual fee for free shipping on most items. <br /><br />While products sold directly and shipped directly by Amazon.com are included in this program, products sold by third-party companies using Amazon's website are not. Is it hard to differentiate between the two? It is to some, and <a href="http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2006/10/isearchbettercom_imp.html">Amazon's search engine not doing the best job</a> of separating those two buckets isn't helping either.<br /><br />Well, instead of Amazon getting around to fix this problem for customers, a third party has fixed it for the online retailer. At <a href="http://www.isearchbetter.com">iSearchBetter.com</a>, product searches are segregated into specifics so a customer can determine which overall cheaper price -- with and without the "Prime" discount -- is available, both from Amazon itself and from third-party sellers also pitching the same product at Amazon's website. <br /><br />For large shoppers of Amazon.com, it's nice to see that a solution like this exists -- although it would have been better for Amazon to re-engineer parts of its search platform to accommodate the various shipping programs it has available.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/amazon-com-gets-a-better-search-engine-by-another-provider/">Amazon.com gets a better search engine -- by another provider</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2006/10/isearchbettercom_imp.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/amazon-com-gets-a-better-search-engine-by-another-provider/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/693273/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/amazon-com-gets-a-better-search-engine-by-another-provider/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A9</category><category>Amazon A9</category><category>Amazon.com</category><category>AmazonA9</category><category>amzn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amazon ditches Google for Microsoft]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/amazon-ditches-google-for-microsoft/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/amazon-ditches-google-for-microsoft/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/amazon-ditches-google-for-microsoft/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><p><img alt="" src="http://static.flickr.com/55/138304384_fe40e80188.jpg?v=0" align="right" />Amazon looks to be the <ahref="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2006/04/amazon-drops-google-from-a9-and-alexa.html">first major web player toditch Google</a> as its primary search partner.&nbsp; There is no official news yet but netizens are beginning toreport that their <a href="http://a9.com/howard%20tsung">A9 searches</a> and <a href="http://howard tsung">Alexasearches</a> are returning Windows Live (MSN search) results.</p>
<p>This comes on the tail of many web retailers taking a defensive stance to Google's release of Google Base, whichlets retailers circumvent eBay and Amazon as aggregators and sell directly to the consumer.</p>
<p>This apparent small victory for Microsoft highlights the coming battle between <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/yahoo-and-msns-strategic-response-to-googles-dominance/">Microsoft,Yahoo, and Google</a> for search (search-revenue) supremacy.</p>
<p>This appears to be a win for Microsoft, a questionable move by Amazon, and a loss for Google.&nbsp; When newsbecomes 'official' how will the markets react?</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/amazon-ditches-google-for-microsoft/">Amazon ditches Google for Microsoft</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 10:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.searchenginelowdown.com/2006/04/google-dumped-by-amazons-alexa-for-msn.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/amazon-ditches-google-for-microsoft/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/613621/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/amazon-ditches-google-for-microsoft/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>a9</category><category>alexa</category><category>amazon</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft live</category><category>MicrosoftLive</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Tsung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 10:33:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
