<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Should you be buying Microsoft (MSFT) shares?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/should-you-be-buying-microsoft-msft-shares/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/should-you-be-buying-microsoft-msft-shares/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/should-you-be-buying-microsoft-msft-shares/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p>Is <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) still a good investment? After the ten-bagger days of the 1990s, it's hard to get excited about a 30 year-old software company that is getting upstaged in the media these days by more popular names like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>). Microsoft has attempted to stay in the game this year (at least from a media perspective) by acquiring aQuantive, its largest-ever purchase.<br /><br />Add to that the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/27/microsofts-msft-halo-3-breaks-records-but-still-wont-save-g/">incredible sales of Halo 3</a> since its debut in late September and there are many bright spots on Microsoft's armor. However, Windows Vista uptake has been slower than some forecast, and that's not the whole negative story. Although its games division is peaking right now, there are years of hard work ahead to make that area consistently profitable and growing. So, again -- why buy Microsoft?<br /><br />Microsoft's corporate products get little attention from the mainstream media these days, but its Office and Exchange software franchises continue to be the lifeblood of many global companies. Sure, Google is trying to nip away at those services with semi-comparable web-based offerings, but that effort will limit itself before becoming a large threat. <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/10/microsoft-earni.html">As noted by 24/7 Wall St.,</a> newer products are on tap, and Goldman Sachs strongly hints at a bright future for the company, at least in the short term.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/should-you-be-buying-microsoft-msft-shares/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Should you be buying Microsoft (MSFT) shares?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/should-you-be-buying-microsoft-msft-shares/">Should you be buying Microsoft (MSFT) shares?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.247wallst.com/2007/10/microsoft-earni.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/should-you-be-buying-microsoft-msft-shares/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1015264/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/should-you-be-buying-microsoft-msft-shares/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aQuantive</category><category>halo 3</category><category>Halo3</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Microsoft. Inc.</category><category>Microsoft.Inc.</category><category>MSFT</category><category>shares</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner's (TWX) online strength: Keep bolstering AOL's ad portfolio]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/time-warners-twx-online-strength-keep-bolstering-aols-ad-po/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/time-warners-twx-online-strength-keep-bolstering-aols-ad-po/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/time-warners-twx-online-strength-keep-bolstering-aols-ad-po/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="94" border="0" align="right" alt="Tacoda logo." src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/tacoda-aol-twx.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) has received the required clearance to <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles?id=n20070827124309990006">acquire Tacoda Inc</a>., a company that targets ads based on a web user's browsing habits. There is no issue with this deal clearing. Time Warner could acquire 100 companies like this and the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice would rubber stamp every single deal.</p>
<p>It is almost funny that the two recent big media and online buys -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has bought aQuantive and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has acquired DoubleClick -- are still being reviewed by some. Those purchases cannot be reversed.</p>
<p>Back to Time Warner and AOL: AOL has found itself in a predicament over backing away from prior estimates for "faster than market growth" for its search-related advertising sales. But if you look back at last month's comScore numbers, as we pointed out earlier, you will realize that AOL <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/time-warners-internet-superstar-advertising-com/">has a massive reach through its Advertising.com</a> division. Any such deal that can incrementally ad both new advertising groups and that can reach more people will be an opportunity for incredible advertising leverage.</p>
<p>It's hard to cover a company like Time Warner one unit at a time. Many in the media still want to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/20/financial-times-discusses-issues-at-time-warner-twx-and-aol/">only cover negative aspects</a> of the company, and considering it is a shot at bashing a competitor it is hard to blame them. Just <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles?id=n20070816082409990011">last week</a>, AOL launched Truveo. AOL may be its own entity next year if my thought process is accurate and the clouds drift the way they have historically. This will allow it to keep adding small strategic plays that can help grow both AOL and the other Time Warner brands. That will be a winning recipe for the company, and should be a winning recipe for shareholders.</p>
<p><em>Jon Ogg is a partner at </em><a href="http://247wallst.com/"><em>24/7 Wall St, LLC</em></a><em>. He produces the 24/7 Wall St. </em><a href="http://www.247wallst.com/special_situation_newsletter.html"><em>Special Situation Investing Newsletter</em></a><em> and does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/time-warners-twx-online-strength-keep-bolstering-aols-ad-po/">Time Warner's (TWX) online strength: Keep bolstering AOL's ad portfolio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/time-warners-twx-online-strength-keep-bolstering-aols-ad-po/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/975238/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/28/time-warners-twx-online-strength-keep-bolstering-aols-ad-po/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>AOL</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>comScore</category><category>DoubleClick</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>marketing</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>online advertising</category><category>privacy</category><category>Tacoda</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft (MSFT) has aQuantive, but will it matter?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/microsoft-msft-has-aquantive-but-will-it-matter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/microsoft-msft-has-aquantive-but-will-it-matter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/microsoft-msft-has-aquantive-but-will-it-matter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p>The wait is over -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has finally completed the purchase of advertising company aQuantive as of this week. Now that the $6 billion purchase is over and done, it's time for the results to be under the microscope: How long will it take Microsoft to use this new muscle against powerful foe <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)? Or let's rephrase that -- will it even matter?<br /><br />As of Monday, aQuantive was officially a "Microsoft wholly-owned subsidiary" and the board disbanded. Oddly, this deal has received a fair amount of attention, but not really enough since it is the largest-ever acquisition by the world's largest software company. Is Redmond placing a bet on its future here outside of operating systems and office productivity software? That seems fairly clear.<br /><br />Will internet advertising outside of Google's successful and unobtrusive model work wonders like all these recent advertising acquisitions make it appear? The further infiltration of advertising into our online lives will only spur many forms to obliterate it. Firefox, a worthy web browser alternative to Microsoft's Internet Explorer, already has tools like <a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/faq">AdBlock Plus</a> and <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433">FlashBlock</a> that can almost completely eliminate online advertising. Will Google's DoubleClick purchase and Microsoft's aQuantive buy be busts due to consumer backlash against so much advertising on the internet? We'll check back in 2010.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/microsoft-msft-has-aquantive-but-will-it-matter/">Microsoft (MSFT) has aQuantive, but will it matter?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/13/AR2007081300398.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/microsoft-msft-has-aquantive-but-will-it-matter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/965723/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/microsoft-msft-has-aquantive-but-will-it-matter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aQuantive</category><category>internet marketing</category><category>InternetMarketing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>online marketing</category><category>OnlineMarketing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Checkfree, another one of my picks, gets bought out]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmg/" rel="tag">Chipotle Mexican Grill'A' (CMG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/opsw/" rel="tag">Opsware Inc (OPSW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/25-stocks-for-next-25-years/" rel="tag">25 Stocks for Next 25 Years</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/clrk/" rel="tag">Color Kinetics (CLRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/zolt/" rel="tag">Zoltek Co (ZOLT)</a></p><p>In my book about Baby Boomer investing I highlight what I feel are the five major growth industries going forward. The industries are health care, alternative energy, technology, communications and lifestyle. I also mention 42 companies within those industries that could be the leaders, the game changers. Since the book has been published, five of the 42 stocks I wrote about are being acquired!<br /><br />The latest one to go is<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/checkfree-corporation/ckfr/nas"> Checkfree</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/checkfree-corporation/ckfr/nas">CKFR</a>).  <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fiserv-inc/fisv/nas">Fiserve</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fiserv-inc/fisv/nas"> FISV</a>) has announced its <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/fiserv-to-acquire-checkfree/n20070802084609990003">$4.4 billion bid</a>. Checkfree made our banking-transactional life much easier. The other four that will be part of larger companies are <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/opsware-incorporated/opsw/nas">Opsware </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/opsware-incorporated/opsw/nas">OPSW</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/color-kinetics-incorporated/clrk/nas">Color Kinetics</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/color-kinetics-incorporated/clrk/nas">CLRK</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kyphon-inc/kyph/nas">Kyphon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kyphon-inc/kyph/nas">KYPH</a>). Other than aQuantive, the other three were also part of my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/25-stocks-for-next-25-years/">Top 25 stocks for the NEXT 25 years</a> series. </p>
<p>As the 42 companies are down to 37, it causes some reflection for the future. Great, emerging companies will always be on the radar screen of larger, well-financed suitors. If growth cannot be internally generated through research and development efforts, larger companies will need to acquire growth and next generation products or technology. With interest rates still historically low, the borrowing necessary to buy these young, up-and-comers is not a significant issue. Investors will reward mature companies if they acquire intelligently and strategically.</p>
<a href="http://www.georgesyared.com/"></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Checkfree, another one of my picks, gets bought out</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/">Checkfree, another one of my picks, gets bought out</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/956368/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/checkfree-another-one-of-my-picks-gets-bought-out/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>chipotle mexican grill</category><category>ChipotleMexicanGrill</category><category>clrk</category><category>cmg</category><category>color kinetics</category><category>ColorKinetics</category><category>inthenews</category><category>opsw</category><category>opsware</category><category>zol</category><category>zoltek</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft and Yahoo! get FTC review of online ad purchase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p>Google's (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) deal to buy DoubleClick seemed certain to get a government review. Google is too dominant in text advertising and DoubeClick too big in display ad serving and targeting. Of course, competitors like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) said it would put too much online advertising power in one set of hands.</p>
<p>Now the eyes of the Federal Trade Commission have turned on Microsoft and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>). Their respective deals to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) and Right Media are going to get the antitrust once over, at the very least.</p>
<p>Right now, the FTC's review of the Google deal is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118185342365535771.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">more formal</a> [subscription required] than the other two, but that could change. More than one industry association has asked that the government to take a close look at all three transactions.</p>
<p>Although the odds are that none of the M&amp;A activity that is designed to bring advertising targeting under the umbrellas of big web portals will be stopped, perhaps the FTC work will be more than a formality. When these three transactions are added to AOL's ownership of Advertising.com, the concentration of private data about individual's web habits will be in very few corporate hands.</p>
<p>Perhaps there should be a divide between those that have the information and those who have the advertising inventory. But, that would be in a too perfect world.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/">Microsoft and Yahoo! get FTC review of online ad purchase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118185342365535771.html?mod=home_whats_news_us>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/918630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/15/microsoft-and-yahoo-get-ftc-review-of-online-ad-purchase/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Advertising.com</category><category>AOL</category><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>DoubleClick</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Right Media</category><category>RightMedia</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jim Cramer begs for Yahoo! &amp; eBay to merge]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p>Jim Cramer proposing on CNBC's <em>Mad Money </em>that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">eBay </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ebay-inc/ebay/nas">EBAY</a>) should get together and merge. He is calling for this because the growth is slowing for both companies, and a merger could jump start it. Cramer contends that companies with slower growth have to do something to get their sizzle back. Cramer said that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) was reportedly in talks to buy Yahoo! and that the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) buyout signals it is willing to do deals. If these companies had better areas to invest in they wouldn't be propping shares up with buybacks. A merger would allow Yahoo!'s massive users to use Skype and PayPal to buy goods. Cramer thinks this would bring back growth, and would <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2006/12/ceos_who_need_t_2.html">finally get Semel out</a> of Yahoo!</p>
<p>This is just after Yahoo!'s <a href="http://www.247wallst.com/2007/05/yahoo_loses_its.html">chief technology officer bailed out of the company</a> today. As Cramer is long Yahoo! in his charitable trust and as he's been touting ideas for something like this, this "call to merge" is hardly a surprise to me or to others. The market caps are very similar, although eBay is the larger company. You should know that if you are playing these stocks based only on Cramer's comments, then know that you are buying what is probably his third or fourth round of recommendations calling for this. This is the first time he made an entire segment on this would-be merger, but this is best defined as "re-information."</p>
<p><em>Jon Ogg can be reached at jonogg@247wallst.com; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/">Jim Cramer begs for Yahoo! &amp; eBay to merge</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 May 2007 19:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/907333/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/30/jim-cramer-begs-for-yahoo-and-ebay-to-merge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>charitable trust</category><category>CharitableTrust</category><category>CNBC</category><category>eBay</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>JimCramer</category><category>Mad Money</category><category>mergers</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>PayPal</category><category>share buybacks</category><category>Skype</category><category>Terry Semel</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! left to fend for itself as Microsoft shuns it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p>Was <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) looking for a complete toolkit to compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) on the internet advertising front?  The company doesn't need <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) to get there. As <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/">Doug noted earlier</a>, Microsoft now says it has "all the pieces" it needs to build a successful ad business -- without even giving a shout out to Yahoo! This is true -- Microsoft has used a little of its war chest to make several acquisitions and partnerships that it will use as the basis for quite a large assault in the world of internet advertising (from the ground up, in a manner of speaking).<br /><br />The purchase of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) was the final arrow in Microsoft's quiver that gives the software giant everything it needs to take on Google successfully -- and all of it was at a price premium to acquiring Yahoo! -- something Microsoft easily knows. Buying Yahoo! would have given it instant customers, but Yahoo!'s advertising strategy is still a little shaky -- and aQuantive's was not. In other words, Microsoft was <a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+has+all+it+needs+for+ad+business/2100-1024_3-6186131.html">looking for the bargain here</a>. It found all the bargains it could.<br /><br />Did Microsoft  need the "instant scale" it would have received from an acquisition like Yahoo!? Some analysts still believe that, although perhaps Microsoft saw that its immense resources could be best used to grow its own scale organically, rather than just to buy it for instant gratification. This news, though, <a href="http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+has+all+it+needs+for+ad+business/2100-1024_3-6186131.html">dampens the outlook for Yahoo! terribly</a>, as the company now is on its own to compete against Google for ad dollars (which it has not being that successful at), as well as the immense capability of Microsoft -- which is its second-largest competitor. YHOO shareholders, get out that rabbit's foot and start rubbing now.<br /><br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/">Yahoo! left to fend for itself as Microsoft shuns it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 May 2007 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+now+has+all+parts+for+ad+business/2110-1024_3-6185996.html?tag=nefd.hed>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/902644/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/yahoo-left-to-fend-for-itself-as-microsoft-shuns-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft walks away from Yahoo!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) made it clear, once and for all, that it does not need <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) to be successful with its internet advertising strategy. Microsoft's Yusuf Mehdi, the head of ad strategy at the world's largest software company <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117994469207212364-search.html?KEYWORDS=yahoo&amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month">said that</a> [subscription] its current internet products plus customers and tech it will get from buying aQuantive (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) round out the arsenal that it needs to compete for online advertising. </p>
<p>The announcement leaves Yahoo! in a a difficult position. With <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) purchase of DoubleClick, Yahoo! does not have a large presence in the internet ad serving business. Its share of the search market is still dropping <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/press-center/hitwiseHS2004/search-engines-april-2007.php">according to Hitwise</a>, and there is still little evidence that the company's Panama advertising search product is bringing in a large slug of new revenue. Yahoo!'s top line only grew about 10% in the last quarter.</p>
<p>Yahoo!'s shares jumped from $28 to over $33 when the press published reports that Microsoft was interested in buying the web portal. But, the stock has sold off to $28.60 since then. Investors are likely to do very little with the shares until Yahoo!'s next quarterly earnings report. If it is weak, and Panama has not produced a quarter of solid results, it will be a long year for Yahoo! shareholders.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/">Microsoft walks away from Yahoo!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 May 2007 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117994469207212364-search.html?KEYWORDS=yahoo&amp;COLLECTION=wsjie/6month>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/902964/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/24/microsoft-walks-away-from-yahoo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Research Analysts: Some great and some lousy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/research-analysts-some-great-and-some-lousy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/research-analysts-some-great-and-some-lousy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/research-analysts-some-great-and-some-lousy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/define/" rel="tag">Define Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vclk/" rel="tag">ValueClick Inc (VCLK)</a></p><p>I have been involved in the investment industry for almost 29 years. The first 13 I spent with Dean Witter Reynolds (now <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ms/nys">MS</a>)) and the last 16 years as a senior partner with two investment banking-research boutique firms. I have worked with over 150 stock research analysts just on the sell-side and another 200 plus on the buy side. Categorically, the title research analyst does not make an analyst a rocket scientist. There are a few myths that need to be explored and more importantly, explained.</p>
<p>There are two and only two types of analysts in the stock research world. 1) those that "get it" and are ahead of their particular industry and can pretty accurately predict what is "going to happen" within the sector they follow, and 2) analysts that are strictly reporters of the news affecting their sectors and do not think outside the box.</p>
<p>Case in point: Stewart Barry of ThinkEquity Partners (my alma mater) has been absolutely brilliant in the internet services sector. Forward thinking, cutting edge research and the ability to separate the news from the noise. Stewart nailed the strong possibilities of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">Aquantive</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas"> AQNT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">24/7 Real Media</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas"> TFSM</a>) being acquired. Both are getting acquired. What Stewart nailed wasn't the rumor mill about these two -- he was dead-right on the fundamental issues affecting <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and how AQNT, TFSM, and DoubleClick could fill those needs. Stewart Barry is an all-star analyst because he is ahead of the curve and ahead of his peer group. Stewart has reiterated his buy rating on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">ValueClick</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas"> VCLK</a>) not because it may be acquired, but because the basic fundamentals are superior and the company's growth rate is accelerating.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/research-analysts-some-great-and-some-lousy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Research Analysts: Some great and some lousy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/research-analysts-some-great-and-some-lousy/">Research Analysts: Some great and some lousy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 May 2007 18:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/research-analysts-some-great-and-some-lousy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/901778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/research-analysts-some-great-and-some-lousy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>Aquantive</category><category>brokers</category><category>DoubleClick</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>growth rates</category><category>GrowthRates</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Stewart Barry</category><category>TFSM</category><category>thinkequity</category><category>ValueClick</category><category>VCLK</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 18:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft's aQuantive buy a shot in the arm? Hardly.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/microsofts-aquantive-buy-a-shot-in-the-arm-hardly/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/microsofts-aquantive-buy-a-shot-in-the-arm-hardly/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/microsofts-aquantive-buy-a-shot-in-the-arm-hardly/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p>As Tom <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/">reported on last week</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.'s </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) purchase of aQuantive and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc's</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) recent purchase of DoubleClick could make one think that the dot-com buying bubble is back.<br /><br />Together, these two acquisitions represent a little over $9 billion in an advertising medium that has grown rapidly in the last five years. Online advertising has swelled to become a major medium that is, increasingly, taking ad dollars out of traditional media streams like television, print and radio. <br /><br />Was Microsoft's aQuantive purchase a desperate effort for the software giant to play "catch up" to Google in the red-hot Internet advertising arena? While I doubt that it was a move of desperation, it does signal that Microsoft feels -- like Google -- that the ad world hasn't seen anything like <a href="http://www.internetfinancialnews.com/financialblogtalk/news/ifn-6-20070521MicrosoftSpends6BillionCounteringGoogle.html">the near-future potential of the Internet</a> in terms of return on ad spend (ROAS). Unlike TV, radio and newspaper advertising, the sheer possibility of tracking customer purchases, tastes, clicks and finely-woven customer behavior detail has never before been as available as it is now.<br /><br />Google saw the writing on the wall, so to speak, long before the others, and its vision has been rewarded by making it the major player in this new universe.  Microsoft has professed that it will be concentrating more and more in this arena to supplement its income from software. In other words, it wants a piece of the pie Google is currently enjoying (along with Yahoo! and AOL). Although some MSFT shareholders fear that Microsoft overpaid for aQuantive (look at the company's fundamentals among other things -- and the share premium that was paid for the company), I'm not of that mind. Was the $6 billion purchase a chess move or a "me too" move from Ole' Softie? My guess? A chess move -- even though it does not appear that way to some.<br /><br /><em>(Disclosure: I own MSFT shares as of 5-22-07)</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/microsofts-aquantive-buy-a-shot-in-the-arm-hardly/">Microsoft's aQuantive buy a shot in the arm? Hardly.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 May 2007 17:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.internetfinancialnews.com/financialblogtalk/news/ifn-6-20070521MicrosoftSpends6BillionCounteringGoogle.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/microsofts-aquantive-buy-a-shot-in-the-arm-hardly/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/901323/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/microsofts-aquantive-buy-a-shot-in-the-arm-hardly/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aQuantive</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google, Inc.</category><category>Google,Inc.</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 17:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 5-22-07: AQNT, GSK, LMT, MSFT and SNDK]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/at/" rel="tag">ALLTEL Corp (AT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lmt/" rel="tag">Lockheed Martin (LMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sndk/" rel="tag">SanDisk Corp (SNDK)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong>  GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK), SanDisk Corp (SNDK), Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT) and aQuantive, Inc (AQNT) were today's noteworthy downgrades: <br />
<ul>
    <li>Deutsche Bank and ABN Amro cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/glaxosmithkline-plc-adr/gsk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GlaxoSmithKline </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/glaxosmithkline-plc-adr/gsk/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GSK</a>) to Hold from Buy following the New England Journal of Medicine warnings from Avandia. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Merrill Lynch cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SanDisk </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sandisk-corporation/sndk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SNDK</a>) to Neutral from Buy due to concerns that oversupply in the industry will extend through next quarter. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Cowen downgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lockheed Martin</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lockheed-martin-corporation/lmt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LMT</a>) to Neutral from Outperform based on slower 2007-2008 EPS growth and less cash redeployment upside than General Dynamics Corp (GD) and Raytheon Co (RTN). </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>UBS downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>) to Neutral from Buy and RBC Capital cut shares to Sector Perform from Outperform after the Microsoft (MSFT) acquisition... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Piper Jaffray downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Cytyc Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CYTC</a>) To Market Perform from Outperform. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/net-bank-inc/ntbk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">NetBank, Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/net-bank-inc/ntbk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">NTBK</a>) was downgraded to Underperform from Market Perform at Friedman Billings. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Merrill Lynch downgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aeropostale-inc/aro/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Aeropostale, Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aeropostale-inc/aro/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ARO</a>) to Neutral from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>AG Edwards downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bhp-billiton-limited/bhp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BHP Billiton Ltd</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bhp-billiton-limited/bhp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BHP</a>) to Hold from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Gabelli downgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alltel-corporation/at/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Alltel Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/alltel-corporation/at/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AT</a>) to Hold from Buy.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com</a> (subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/">Analyst downgrades 5-22-07: AQNT, GSK, LMT, MSFT and SNDK</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 May 2007 10:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/901419/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/22/analyst-downgrades-5-22-07-aqnt-gsk-lmt-msft-and-sndk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aeropostale</category><category>alltel</category><category>analyst</category><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>aro</category><category>at</category><category>bhp</category><category>cytc</category><category>cytyc</category><category>downgraded</category><category>glaxo</category><category>gsk</category><category>lockheed</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>netbank</category><category>ntbk</category><category>rating</category><category>sandisk</category><category>sndk</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades 5-21-07: AQNT, CCU, CI, CFC and WMG]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ci/" rel="tag">CIGNA Corp (CI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ccu/" rel="tag">Clear Channel Commun (CCU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intu/" rel="tag">Intuit Inc (INTU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vclk/" rel="tag">ValueClick Inc (VCLK)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>ValueClick, Inc (VCLK), aQuantive, Inc (AQNT), Cigna Corp (CI), Warner Music Group (WMG), Clear Channel Communications, Inc (CCU) and Medtronic, Inc (MDT) were today's more notable downgrades:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Baird cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ValueClick Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">VCLK</a>) to Neutral from Outperform, citing the FTC inquiry. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>) was downgraded to Sell from Buy after the company was acquired by Microsoft (MSFT) and because aQuantive no longer trades on fundamentals.  Kaufman and Gabelli also cut aQuantive to Hold from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cigna-corporation/ci/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Cigna </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cigna-corporation/ci/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CI</a>) was downgraded at Prudential to Neutral from Overweight on valuation.  </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/warner-music-group-corp/wmg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Warner Music Group's </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/warner-music-group-corp/wmg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">WMG</a>) downgrade to Sell from Neutral at Pali Research was based on the lower industry outlook, which Pali believes revenues are likely to fall at least 10% for the industry in 2007, along with the company's release schedule. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Bear Stearns downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clear-channel-communications-inc/ccu/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Clear Channel Communications</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/clear-channel-communications-inc/ccu/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CCU</a>) to Peer Perform from Outperform on the acceptance of the higher bid.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Medtronic Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/medtronic-inc/mdt/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MDT</a>) was downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/georgia-gulf-corporation/ggc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Georgia Gulf Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/georgia-gulf-corporation/ggc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GGC</a>) was downgraded to Sell from Hold at Matrix USA. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Stifel cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/core-laboratories-n-v/clb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Core Laboratories</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/core-laboratories-n-v/clb/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CLB</a>) to Hold from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>UBS downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuit-inc/intu/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Intuit Inc </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intuit-inc/intu/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">INTU</a>) to Neutral from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Occidental Petroleum Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">OXY</a>) was removed from Goldman's Conviction Buy list. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Friedman Billings downgraded downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capitalsource-inc/cse/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CapitalSource, Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/capitalsource-inc/cse/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CSE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Countrywide Financial Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CFC</a>) to Market Perform from Outperform.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com </a>(subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/">Analyst downgrades 5-21-07: AQNT, CCU, CI, CFC and WMG</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 May 2007 11:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/900564/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-downgrade-5-21-07-aqnt-ccu-ci-cfc-and-wmg/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst</category><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>capitalsource</category><category>ccu</category><category>cfc</category><category>ci</category><category>cigna</category><category>clb</category><category>clear channel</category><category>ClearChannel</category><category>core labs</category><category>CoreLabs</category><category>countrywide</category><category>cse</category><category>downgrade</category><category>georgia gulf</category><category>GeorgiaGulf</category><category>ggc</category><category>intu</category><category>intuit</category><category>mdt</category><category>medtronic</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>occidential</category><category>oxy</category><category>rating</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>valueclick</category><category>vclk</category><category>warner music</category><category>WarnerMusic</category><category>wmg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 11:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst upgrades 5-21-07: ADBE, CMCSA, MSFT, SNE and TIF]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-upgrades-5-21-07-adbe-cmcsa-msft-sne-and-tif/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-upgrades-5-21-07-adbe-cmcsa-msft-sne-and-tif/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-upgrades-5-21-07-adbe-cmcsa-msft-sne-and-tif/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tif/" rel="tag">Tiffany and Co (TIF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vlo/" rel="tag">Valero Energy (VLO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twc/" rel="tag">Time Warner Cable (TWC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aol-fly-logo.gif"  alt="" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY:</strong> Microsoft (MSFT), Sony Corp (SNE), Adobe Systems Inc (ADBE) and the cable sector were today's noteworthy upgrades: <br />
<ul>
    <li>DA Davidson upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) to Buy from Neutral, as the firm is no longer concerned the tech giant will acquire Yahoo! (YHOO) following the recent acquisition of aQuantive, Inc (AQNT). </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>HSBC upgraded shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Sony Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">SNE</a>) to Overweight from Neutral to reflect improving profitability at Sony's electronics business. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Pacific Crest upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Adobe Systems </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ADBE</a>) to Outperform from Sector Perform to reflect the strong CS3 outlook and growth in new areas such as mobile. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Citigroup upgraded their cable sector view as they continue believe cap ex will remain at elevated levels at a time when the marginal cable investor is likely more willing to forego near-term FCF growth to achieve robust EBITDA growth. Along with the raised sector view, Citigroup upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner Cable</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-cable-inc-cl-a/twc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWC</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Comcast Corp </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corp-new-cl-a/cmcsa/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CMCSA</a>) to Buy from Hold. The firm believes investors can benefit from owning both EchoStar Communications (DISH) and cable equities... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER UPGRADES: </strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>Bear Stearns upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tiffany-and-co-new/tif/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Tiffany &amp; Co </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tiffany-and-co-new/tif/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TIF</a>) to Outperform from Peer Perform. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>RBC Capital raised <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-eagle-outfitters-inc/aeo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">American Eagle Outfitters</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-eagle-outfitters-inc/aeo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AEO</a>) to Outperform from Sector Perform.  </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sepracor-inc/sepr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Sepracor Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sepracor-inc/sepr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SEPR</a>) was raised to Neutral from Underperform at Cowen. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>ING upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c-ads/bp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BP plc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bp-p-l-c-ads/bp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BP</a>) to Buy from Hold. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valero-energy-corporation/vlo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Valero Energy Corp </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valero-energy-corporation/vlo/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">VLO</a>) was added to Goldman's Conviction Buy list.</li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com </a>(subscription required).</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-upgrades-5-21-07-adbe-cmcsa-msft-sne-and-tif/">Analyst upgrades 5-21-07: ADBE, CMCSA, MSFT, SNE and TIF</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 21 May 2007 10:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-upgrades-5-21-07-adbe-cmcsa-msft-sne-and-tif/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/900546/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/21/analyst-upgrades-5-21-07-adbe-cmcsa-msft-sne-and-tif/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adbe</category><category>adobe</category><category>aeo</category><category>american eagle</category><category>AmericanEagle</category><category>analyst</category><category>aquantive</category><category>bp</category><category>cable</category><category>dish</category><category>echostar</category><category>microsoft</category><category>rating</category><category>sepr</category><category>sepracor</category><category>sony</category><category>theflyonthewall.com</category><category>tif</category><category>tiffany</category><category>time warner cable</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twc</category><category>upgrade</category><category>valero</category><category>vlo</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 10:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Online ads' closed-loop solution]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/">Recent mergers</a> between traditional and online advertising firms suggest a deep flaw in the advertising business -- a flaw exposed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>)'s evidently unstoppable technology edge. How so? While traditional advertisers deliver <strong>open-loop systems</strong>, Google delivers a <strong>closed-loop solution</strong>.</p>
<p>The reason that online advertising is growing is because it offers a <strong>closed-loop solution</strong> -- a notion that I first described in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Net-Profit-Compete-Internet-Business/dp/0787956872"><em>Net Profit</em></a>. By contrast, TV and newspaper advertising is an <strong>open-loop system</strong> -- one in which a company pays to reach a viewer without getting any specific feedback on whether the advertising money leads to increased sales.</p>
<p>By contrast, a closed-loop solution measures the specific response to the advertising dollar -- tracking whether a user clicks on an ad and whether that clicking leads to an online purchase. <em><strong>I call it a solution because it lets the advertiser measure the extent to which advertising expense leads to increased sales</strong></em>. The closed-loop solution's ability to <strong>measure return on advertising</strong> is an enormous breakthrough for advertisers.</p>
<p>As everybody knows, Google's algorithm for linking tiny text advertising to Internet search has boosted the online advertising business. According to the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117948955764907440.html?mod=hps_us_pageone">Wall Street Journal</a></em> [subscription required], those search-related ads now account for 40% of the $20 billion U.S. internet ad market. And internet-ad sales overall have nearly tripled in the past five years -- to 7% of the $286 billion overall U.S. ad market -- up from 3% in 2002.</p>
<p>Moreover, Google's success is coming out of the hide of TV and newspaper advertisers. For example, in 2006 <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) cut its TV ad spending 15% to $1.38 billion and reduced its newspaper advertising 60% to $232.1 million. Meanwhile, GM's online spending rose 16% to $130 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Online ads' closed-loop solution</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/">Online ads' closed-loop solution</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 19 May 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899675/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/19/online-ads-closed-loop-solution/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>24/7</category><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>closed-loop</category><category>DoubleClick</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Net Profit</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>open-loop</category><category>Peter Cohan</category><category>PeterCohan</category><category>Real Media</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>TSFM</category><category>WPP</category><category>WPPGY</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[aQuantive goes back in time - to 1999]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insiders/" rel="tag">Insiders</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/aqnt.bmp" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Back in the 1990s, a group of online ad players -- like Mediaplex, DoubleClick and 24/7 -- sported multibillion dollar market caps. Of course, it did not take long for the bubble to burst.</p>
<p>Funny enough, the conventional wisdom was that we would never see these kinds of valuations again.</p>
<p>Well, never say never.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is going to pay $6 billion for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) is buying DoubleClick for $3.1 billion.</p>
<p>We are going back to the future. So what does this all mean?</p>
<p>I had a chance to interview Dana Ghavami, who is the CEO of <a href="http://www.checkm8.com/">CheckM8</a>:</p>
<p><em>How about some background on your company?</em></p>
<p>CheckM8 has been in the business of online ad technologies for seven years. We service many leading online publishers and are backed by leading institutional investors, including SoftBank and CCI of Dentsu. The company is US-based, with offices in New York and R&amp;D facilities in Israel, in addition to sales and support offices in the UK, Spain, and Sweden. Customers include leading online publishers: <em>Business Week</em>, Nielsen, <em>Sports Illustrated</em>, Terra Networks, <em>Washington Post</em>, amongst many others. Our first product, called the Rich Media Manager, released four years ago, allows publishers to produce and manage premium ad formats for maximum-CPM opportunities online. Our flagship AdVantage product released two years ago allows publishers to manage their end-to-end ad, inventory, rich media needs in a single platform.</p>
<p><em>Does the Microsoft deal for aQuantive make sense in light of the high valuation?</em></p>
<p>We're looking at an industry that's going to drive $60B of advertising by 2010 and be the future medium of consumers and advertisers. So, if I had a major stake (like Microsoft) and the competition (Google) was one step ahead, I'd pull that kind of trigger too in hopes of having one of the seats at the small and priceless roundtable in the not-so distant future. These companies are looking at making multiples of what they're paying today in the foreseeable future.</p>
<p><em>Do you think we'll see more consolidation in the space, such as with ValueClick and private companies?</em></p>
<p>Very likely. However, the big media companies are increasingly looking for integrity and independence with their digital ad infrastructure and rapidly running out of options. At some point, there won't be enough established<br />and proven solutions to manage their critical needs and building their own solutions is not a practical option. Therefore, the need for reputable and trustworthy independent solutions will continue to exist.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the</em> Complete M&amp;A Handbook <em>and the</em> EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/">aQuantive goes back in time - to 1999</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899332/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-s-goes-back-in-time-to-1999/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>CheckM8:</category><category>Dana Ghavami</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT: Google</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[aQuantive sale leaves ValueClick ripe for purchase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vclk/" rel="tag">ValueClick Inc (VCLK)</a></p><p>I have been writing about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) for the past several months and thought that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) would buy them. It is, for a very hefty premium. Members of <a href="http://www.georgesyared.com/">my website</a> are thrilled as they got involved at $19 and MSFT is paying $66.50, or north of $6 billion in cash.</p>
<p>Who's next? With a garbage-like company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">24/7 Real Media</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">TFSM</a>) being bought for $650 million -- which proves the rising-tide-lifts-all-boats theory -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">ValueClick</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/valueclick-inc/vclk/nas">VCLK</a>) is the last strong public player in the space. TFSM by the way is being paid a minuscule premium for its shares as compared to AQNT. My previous firm ThinkEquity Partners worked extensively with TFSM and they have been hoping for a buyer the past couple of years.That aside, VCLK is the one to focus on now.</p>
<p>ValueClick is headquartered in suburban Los Angeles and is a recognized leader in the website marketing/advertising/digital marketing sector, right behind AQNT. ValueClick is experiencing growth in the 30-35% sustainable range, similar to aQuantive. The most important factor is ValueClick is among the leaders in the new-age digital media space.</p>
<p>New-age digital media is a space that neither <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) nor Microsoft could master with their own research and development efforts -- they had to acquire it. Old-time advertising companies can play in the space around the fringes, but they do not have the necessary proprietary technology needed to dominate or impress their customers. They were buyers of the technology from ValueClick, aQuantive and DoubleClick.</p>
<p>The space is red hot and will continue so as traditional corporations keep moving bigger and bigger pieces of their advertising budgets to the internet. Congratulations to Microsoft -- they got this one right!!</p>
<p><em>Georges Yared is the CIO of </em><a href="http://www.georgesyared.com/"><em>Yared Investment Research</em></a><em> where he explores more growth stock ideas.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/">aQuantive sale leaves ValueClick ripe for purchase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 14:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/899222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/aquantive-sale-leaves-valueclick-ripe-for-purchase/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>ValueClick</category><category>VCLK</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 14:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Microsoft is spending $6 billion on aQuantive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p>This morning <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) announced that it's buying <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>) for $6 billion, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/05/18/ap3735763.html">an 85% premium</a> to its market price. Why is this deal happening? To compete with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>).</p>
<p>Last year my firm conducted a client-sponsored study of the email marketing industry. The top performing company in that research was AQNT. After interviewing the senior executives there, it became clear that email marketing offers a compelling benefit for a corporate advertiser -- the ability to measure return on advertising. </p>
<p>The reason Microsoft wants this ability is to help it compete with GOOG for online advertising dollars. That's because AQNT's technology enables companies to track what happens to their spam. Specifically, AQNT's Avenue A service targets emails depending on observed online behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why Microsoft is spending $6 billion on aQuantive</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/">Why Microsoft is spending $6 billion on aQuantive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898999/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/why-microsoft-is-spending-6-billion-on-aquantive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>cookies</category><category>email</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>marketing</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>spam</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft pays too much for aQuantive]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) is paying an <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/microsoft-to-acquire-aquantive-inc/n20070518080709990012">85% premium</a> to buy online advertising firm <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas">AQNT</a>). Yes, that's 85%. It is the price for being late to the dance.</p>
<p>After missing out on both DoubleClick and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">24/7 Real Media</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/24-7-real-media-inc/tfsm/nas">TFSM</a>), Microsoft had few options left if it wanted a presence in the internet advertising brokerage business -- the intersection where markets buy ads and place them on websites. The companies in this business have huge amounts of data on internet use patterns.</p>
<p>So, Microsoft will pay about $6 billion for a company that had $143 million in revenue last quarter and an operating profit of $20 million. Doesn't Steve Ballmer keeps saying he won't over pay for anything? Before the DoubleClick deal with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), aQuantive sold below $30, so the real premium can actually be viewed as well over 100%.</p>
<p>Being so late, and paying so much is a huge strategic blunder, but it is the price for waiting</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is a partner at 24/7 Wall St.</em> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/">Microsoft pays too much for aQuantive</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/microsoft-to-acquire-aquantive-inc/n20070518080709990012>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898961/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/microsoft-pays-too-much-for-aquantive/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>24/7 real media</category><category>24/7RealMedia</category><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>doubleclick</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>Steve Ballmer</category><category>SteveBallmer</category><category>tfsm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[aQuantive: Advertising prowess on the web]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adbe/" rel="tag">Adobe Systems (ADBE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/k/" rel="tag">Kellogg Co (K)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.stockwinners.com"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/stockwinners.jpg" alt="" /></a>Online marketing is a hot topic, but the Internet is a specialized medium and success in that arena requires expert help. One of the industry's best known practitioners is headquartered in Seattle, Washington.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">aQuantive Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/aquantive-inc/aqnt/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AQNT</a>) is a digital marketing services and technology company, which aims to help clients acquire, retain and grow customers across all digital media. Its Digital Marketing Services division provides Web site development, interactive marketing, creative development and branding. The Digital Marketing Technologies unit offers advertisers online campaign management, search engine marketing and Web site optimization tools. The Digital Performance Media segment buys blocks of online media advertising to resell on a targeted basis. The aQuantive client list includes <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Adobe Systems Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ADBE</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Kellogg Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kellogg-company/k/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">K</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">McDonald's Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MCD</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Pepsico Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pepsico-inc/pep/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PEP</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Procter &amp; Gamble Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">PG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Nike Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NKE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Walt Disney Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DIS</a>).</p>
<p>The firm became the object of acquisition speculation, after <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Google Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc-cl-a/goog/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">GOOG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>) recently strengthened their respective Web positions by purchasing aQuantive digital marketing rivals. Client <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) has been mentioned as a possible suitor.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>aQuantive: Advertising prowess on the web</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/">aQuantive: Advertising prowess on the web</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 May 2007 14:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/894238/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/aquantive-advertising-prowess-on-the-web/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>a</category><category>adbe</category><category>AQNT</category><category>aQuantive</category><category>dis</category><category>fundamental analysis</category><category>FundamentalAnalysis</category><category>goog</category><category>k</category><category>mcd</category><category>momentum</category><category>msft</category><category>nke</category><category>pennant</category><category>pep</category><category>pg</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Schutts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The new young bulls of technology: Who will be the Microsoft of the 21st century?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/the-new-young-bulls-of-technology-who-will-be-the-microsoft-of/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/the-new-young-bulls-of-technology-who-will-be-the-microsoft-of/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/the-new-young-bulls-of-technology-who-will-be-the-microsoft-of/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/akam/" rel="tag">Akamai Technologies (AKAM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/crm/" rel="tag">salesforce.com inc (CRM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/opsw/" rel="tag">Opsware Inc (OPSW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aqnt/" rel="tag">aQuantive Inc (AQNT)</a></p><p>During the 1990's and early 2000's, the world witnessed a technology boom as had never before been experienced. Small, innovative companies founded by creative, visionary entrepreneurs became mega-billion dollar corporations with multi-billion dollar market capitalizations. The stories came at us like glorious movie scripts: the hometown nerd rises to super stardom: Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Michael Dell, Larry Ellison, John Chambers and many more newly-crowned titans were appearing in the society pages, as well as the business pages. Technologies were created that simplified our daily lives and enhanced productivity to levels never before thought of. Almost every human being was benefited by new, affordable technologies. Cars, TVs, appliances, PCs, cell phones,and several other products became fun, simple to use and affordable.</p>
<p>Along the way, massive fortunes were made by founders, employees, mutual funds and individual shareholders. Wall Street analysts also gained rock start status--maybe it was being in the right place at the right time.</p>
<p>Then came the nuclear winter for technology in late 2000-2001. Corporations and governments found themselves in the position of assessing what they bought and needing to monetize all these new technology assets. New spending came to near standstill. All of the investment geniuses who made the "easy" money were now facing losses and scrambling for the exits. Investing went back to the rules and principles that we all learned as beginners again. </p>
<p>No question about it: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">Oracle</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell</a>,<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys"> IBM</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">Hewlett-Packard Compaq</a>, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel</a> and others are great American corporations. They collectively represent a few trillion dollars worth of market cap and multiple billions of annual profits. However, each titan of the 80's and 90's is facing its own issues of trying to re-grow the revenue and earnings base -- trying to recapture the magical secret sauce -- reminiscent of the older baseball pitcher who has lost 4-5 mph off his fastball and is trying to make it work with pitch location and craftiness.</p>
<p>But, investors are looking at the new, emerging group of companies that could dominate this decade and the next. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/the-new-young-bulls-of-technology-who-will-be-the-microsoft-of/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The new young bulls of technology: Who will be the Microsoft of the 21st century?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/the-new-young-bulls-of-technology-who-will-be-the-microsoft-of/">The new young bulls of technology: Who will be the Microsoft of the 21st century?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/the-new-young-bulls-of-technology-who-will-be-the-microsoft-of/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/872038/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/11/the-new-young-bulls-of-technology-who-will-be-the-microsoft-of/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>akamai</category><category>aqnt</category><category>aquantive</category><category>crm</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>opsw</category><category>opsware</category><category>salesforce</category><category>salesforce.com</category><category>young bulls</category><category>YoungBulls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Georges Yared]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
