<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Was Goldman Wrong to Take Both Sides of the Mortgage Market?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/was-goldman-wrong-to-take-both-sides-of-the-mortgage-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/was-goldman-wrong-to-take-both-sides-of-the-mortgage-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/was-goldman-wrong-to-take-both-sides-of-the-mortgage-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs </a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/dealer_poker_chips_262258_l.jpg" />The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/business/19goldman.html?hp"><em>New York Times</em></a> re-reported Monday a story that originally appeared in the <a href="http://www.gata.org/node/5840"><em>Wall Street Journal </em>in December 14, 2007</a> about how Goldman Sachs' (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><font color="#1f5e7f">GS</font></a>) bet against the mortgage market that it helped create. I appeared on <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=610541042">CNBC in December 2007</a> praising Goldman for taking this position because it showed that Goldman could be flexible and adapt to changing market conditions rather than getting locked in to defending its previous decisions. <br />
<br />
Before getting into why Goldman has every right to take both sides of the mortgage market, let's look at the key facts. According to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/business/19goldman.html?hp"><em>New York Times</em></a>, Goldman's top executives were involved in making decisions about its position in the mortgage market -- including CEO Lloyd Blankfein, President Gary Cohn, Goldman's president, and CFO David A. Viniar. (Their involvement is territory previously covered by the <em>Journal</em> -- although it focused on two traders who pushed Goldman to bet against the mortgages by shorting the ABX, a mortgage index.)<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/was-goldman-wrong-to-take-both-sides-of-the-mortgage-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Was Goldman Wrong to Take Both Sides of the Mortgage Market?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/was-goldman-wrong-to-take-both-sides-of-the-mortgage-market/">Was Goldman Wrong to Take Both Sides of the Mortgage Market?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/was-goldman-wrong-to-take-both-sides-of-the-mortgage-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19445327/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/19/was-goldman-wrong-to-take-both-sides-of-the-mortgage-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Abacus</category><category>Cohn</category><category>Feabrice Touree</category><category>gs</category><category>Viniar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Divvied up: TWX announces quarterly dividend]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/divvied-up-twx-to-give-regular-quarterly-dividend/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/divvied-up-twx-to-give-regular-quarterly-dividend/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/divvied-up-twx-to-give-regular-quarterly-dividend/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Good news, owners of TWX stock! Not only are you going to enjoy the benefits of more realitytelevision, more syndicated re-runs and more pithy "commentary" from observers like myself, you're also goingto be getting a nickel. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">That's right, yesterday, the Board of Directors of Time Warner declared that owners of CommonStock will receive $0.05 a share, in cash, on June 15, 2006.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Huzzah!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So, the big question is, how many shares of stock would I have to own (which I don't---I don'town any TWX) in order to take advantage of the following Warner entertainment options:</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/divvied-up-twx-to-give-regular-quarterly-dividend/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Divvied up: TWX announces quarterly dividend</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/divvied-up-twx-to-give-regular-quarterly-dividend/">Divvied up: TWX announces quarterly dividend</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/time-warner-inc-declares-regular/n20060427155309990002>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/divvied-up-twx-to-give-regular-quarterly-dividend/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/612618/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/divvied-up-twx-to-give-regular-quarterly-dividend/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abacus</category><category>Broadway</category><category>dividend</category><category>Lestat</category><category>Poseidon</category><category>summer blockbuster</category><category>SummerBlockbuster</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Warner</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
