<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Allstate Sells Off on Weak Q4 Results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/09/allstate-sells-off-on-weak-q4-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/09/allstate-sells-off-on-weak-q4-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/09/allstate-sells-off-on-weak-q4-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/all/" rel="tag">Allstate Corp (ALL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/allstate-logo-240.jpg" alt="allstate q4 earnings report" />Shares of insurance giant The Allstate Corporation (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-allstate-corporation/all/nys">ALL</a>) are trading sharply lower in after hours trading after the company reported <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110209-717888.html">weaker than expected Q4 results</a> this afternoon.</p>
<p>Going into this afternoon's earnings report, analysts had been expecting to see the company report earnings of $0.88, but actual results came in much lower than expected at just $0.55 per share.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/09/allstate-sells-off-on-weak-q4-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Allstate Sells Off on Weak Q4 Results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/09/allstate-sells-off-on-weak-q4-results/">Allstate Sells Off on Weak Q4 Results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/09/allstate-sells-off-on-weak-q4-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19837337/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/09/allstate-sells-off-on-weak-q4-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>ALL</category><category>Allstate</category><category>Allstate earnings</category><category>bad news</category><category>earnings</category><category>insuarance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>natural disasters</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Winn-Dixie Trading Lower Despite Topping Analyst Estimates]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/31/winn-dixie-trading-lower-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/31/winn-dixie-trading-lower-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/31/winn-dixie-trading-lower-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p><img width="245" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="199" border="o" align="right" alt="Winn-Dixie earnings report" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/winn-dixie.jpg" />Shares of grocer chain Winn-Dixie (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/winn-dixie-stores-inc/winn/nas">WINN</a>) traded a bit lower in <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/After-Hours%20Trading,AHT">after hours trading</a>, despite the company posting <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100830-710807.html">better-than-expected earnings</a> numbers Monday after the close.<br />
<br />
Headed into the fiscal fourth quarter report, analysts had been expecting to see <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/">earnings</a> of 15 cents per share. Actual <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/" class="inlinked">earnings</a> easily topped estimates at 25 cents per share. During the same period last year, the company had earnings of 17 cents per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/31/winn-dixie-trading-lower-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Winn-Dixie Trading Lower Despite Topping Analyst Estimates</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/31/winn-dixie-trading-lower-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/">Winn-Dixie Trading Lower Despite Topping Analyst Estimates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/31/winn-dixie-trading-lower-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19614172/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/31/winn-dixie-trading-lower-despite-topping-analyst-estimates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>featured</category><category>grocers</category><category>inthenews</category><category>retailers</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>winn</category><category>winn-dixie</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amgen Posts Better-Than-Expected Q2 Earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/amgen-posts-better-than-expected-q2-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/amgen-posts-better-than-expected-q2-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/amgen-posts-better-than-expected-q2-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amgn/" rel="tag">Amgen Inc (AMGN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="amgen second quarter earnigns preview" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/amgn.jpg" />Shares of biotech giant Amgen, Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">AMGN</a>) are trading slightly higher in after hours trading this afternoon after the company delivered <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Earnings/Amgen+%28AMGN%29+Reports+Q2+EPS+of+%241.38%2C+Beats+by+8c%3B+Reaffirms/5847610.html">better than expected earnings</a> for its second quarter.<br />
<br />
Going into this afternoon's earnings report, analysts had been expecting to see Amgen report $1.30 per share, but the company was able to beat out analyst estimates by reporting an actual $1.38 for the quarter.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/amgen-posts-better-than-expected-q2-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Amgen Posts Better-Than-Expected Q2 Earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/amgen-posts-better-than-expected-q2-earnings/">Amgen Posts Better-Than-Expected Q2 Earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/amgen-posts-better-than-expected-q2-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19574061/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/29/amgen-posts-better-than-expected-q2-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>Amgen</category><category>AMGN</category><category>biotech</category><category>biotech stocks</category><category>biotechnology</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>forecasts</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Aflac Trading Slightly Higher Following Q1 Earnings Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/28/aflac-trading-slightly-higher-following-q1-earnings-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/28/aflac-trading-slightly-higher-following-q1-earnings-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/28/aflac-trading-slightly-higher-following-q1-earnings-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/afl/" rel="tag">AFLAC Inc (AFL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="aflac first quarter earnings" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/aflac.gif" />Shares of insurance giant Aflac Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aflac-incorporated/afl/nys" class="inlinked">AFL</a>) were slightly higher in after-hours trading Tuesday following the company's announcement of <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSSGE63Q0JR20100427">better-than-expected earnings</a> for its first quarter.<br />
<br />
After the market close Aflac posted earnings per share of $1.35 for its first quarter, which was slightly higher than the $1.32 that analysts had forecast for the company's quarter. During the same period last year the company had earnings of $1.22 per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/28/aflac-trading-slightly-higher-following-q1-earnings-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Aflac Trading Slightly Higher Following Q1 Earnings Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/28/aflac-trading-slightly-higher-following-q1-earnings-report/">Aflac Trading Slightly Higher Following Q1 Earnings Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/28/aflac-trading-slightly-higher-following-q1-earnings-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19456515/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/28/aflac-trading-slightly-higher-following-q1-earnings-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>afl</category><category>after hours</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>good news</category><category>insurance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>japan</category><category>wal mart</category><category>wmt</category><category>yen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oracle Tops Analyst Estimates]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/oracle-tops-analyst-estimates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/oracle-tops-analyst-estimates/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/oracle-tops-analyst-estimates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/orcl/" rel="tag">Oracle Corp (ORCL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" alt="orcl earnigns report" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/oracle-logo-200x150.jpg" />This afternoon tech giant Oracle Corporation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas">ORCL</a>) reported its fiscal third quarter numbers, and as analysts expected it was a strong quarter for the California based company, which <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_EARNS_ORACLE?SITE=DCUSN&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">easily outpaced analyst estimates</a>.<br />
<br />
As we noted in our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/oracle-third-quarter-earnings-preview-is-tech-on-the-rebound/">Oracle earnings preview</a>, analysts had been expecting to see the company post earnings of $0.35 per share. The company's actual earnings came in at $0.38 per share, excluding one-time items.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/oracle-tops-analyst-estimates/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oracle Tops Analyst Estimates</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/oracle-tops-analyst-estimates/">Oracle Tops Analyst Estimates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/oracle-tops-analyst-estimates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19414843/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/25/oracle-tops-analyst-estimates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>EarningsReports</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Oracle</category><category>ORCL</category><category>tech</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Qualcomm Off Sharply Following Weak Q2 Forecast]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/qualcomm-off-sharply-following-weak-q2-forecast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/qualcomm-off-sharply-following-weak-q2-forecast/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/qualcomm-off-sharply-following-weak-q2-forecast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/qcom/" rel="tag">QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/qualcomm-logosmall.jpg" />Shares of semiconductor giant Qualcomm (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas">QCOM</a>) traded sharply lower Wednesday afternoon after the company's fiscal first quarter earnings report during which QCOM <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/qualcomm-profit-doubles-lowers-fiscal-year-revenue-view-2010-01-27?siteid=aolRss">lowered its second quarter forecast</a>.<br />
<br />
As we noted in our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/qualcomm-earnings-preview-strong-q1-results-expected/">QCOM earnings preview</a>, analysts were expecting to see the company post earnings of 56 cents per share for its fiscal first quarter, and the company was able to outpace estimates by showing earnings of 62 cents per share excluding items.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/qualcomm-off-sharply-following-weak-q2-forecast/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Qualcomm Off Sharply Following Weak Q2 Forecast</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/qualcomm-off-sharply-following-weak-q2-forecast/">Qualcomm Off Sharply Following Weak Q2 Forecast</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/qualcomm-off-sharply-following-weak-q2-forecast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19334886/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/qualcomm-off-sharply-following-weak-q2-forecast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>BadNews</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings report</category><category>EarningsReport</category><category>featured</category><category>forecasts</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><category>semiconductor</category><category>tech</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Applied Materials (AMAT) tops analyst estimates]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/applied-materials-amat-tops-analyst-estimates/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/applied-materials-amat-tops-analyst-estimates/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/applied-materials-amat-tops-analyst-estimates/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amat/" rel="tag">Applied Materials (AMAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Applied Materials Q4 Earnings" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/amat-applied-materials-logo.jpg" />Semiconductor maker Applied Materials (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/applied-materials-inc/amat/nas">AMAT</a>) reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/applied-materials-announces-solid-fourth-quarter-results/rfid269823937?channel=pf">its fiscal fourth quarter numbers</a> this afternoon following the market close, and the company easily outpaced analyst estimates.<br /><br />Going into this afternoon's earnings report, analysts had been expecting to see the company show earnings of 3 cents per share, but the company surprised to the upside by posting actual Q4 earnings of 13 cents.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/applied-materials-amat-tops-analyst-estimates/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Applied Materials (AMAT) tops analyst estimates</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/applied-materials-amat-tops-analyst-estimates/">Applied Materials (AMAT) tops analyst estimates</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/applied-materials-amat-tops-analyst-estimates/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19233684/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/11/applied-materials-amat-tops-analyst-estimates/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>AMAT</category><category>applied materials</category><category>earnings</category><category>forecast</category><category>good news</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>recovery</category><category>tech</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks reports better than expected fourth quarter earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/starbucks-reports-better-than-expected-fourth-quarter-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/starbucks-reports-better-than-expected-fourth-quarter-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/starbucks-reports-better-than-expected-fourth-quarter-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img hspace="4" height="220" width="197" vspace="4" border="o" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/starbucks_latte.jpg" alt="Starbucks Earnings Report" />Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) are trading up in after hours trading today after the company <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/starbucks-posts-strong-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-2009-results/rfid267967480?channel=pf">posted strong Q4 earnings</a> numbers after the market close.<br /><br />As we noted in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/earnings-preview-starbucks/">our earnings preview</a>, the company was expected to show earnings for the quarter of 21 cents per share on $2.39 billion in revenues. The actual numbers came in at 24 cents per share with revenues of $2.4 billion.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/starbucks-reports-better-than-expected-fourth-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks reports better than expected fourth quarter earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/starbucks-reports-better-than-expected-fourth-quarter-earnings/">Starbucks reports better than expected fourth quarter earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/starbucks-reports-better-than-expected-fourth-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19225329/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/starbucks-reports-better-than-expected-fourth-quarter-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>coffee</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>good news</category><category>GoodNews</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cisco posts strong Q1 earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/csco/" rel="tag">Cisco Systems (CSCO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="cisco first quarter earnings" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/cisco080607.gif" />Following today's market close, technology giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">Cisco Systems</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cisco-systems-inc/csco/nas">CSCO</a>) had its chance to impress Wall Street with <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/story/10622109/1/cisco-nails-it-sees-healing-economy.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=Free&amp;cm_pla=Feed&amp;cm_ite=Feed">its fiscal first quarter results</a>, and the company did not disappoint.<br /><br />Going into this afternoon's earnings report, analysts had been expecting to see the company show earnings of 31 cents per share, but the company surprised to the upside by posting actual earnings of 36 cents per share for its fiscal first quarter. For the same period last year the company had earnings of 42 cents per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cisco posts strong Q1 earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/">Cisco posts strong Q1 earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19223710/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/cisco-csco-posts-strong-q1-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>Cisco</category><category>CSCO</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>forecast</category><category>inthenews</category><category>technology</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mosaic reports lower than expected first quarter earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/mosaic-reports-lower-than-expected-first-quarter-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/mosaic-reports-lower-than-expected-first-quarter-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/mosaic-reports-lower-than-expected-first-quarter-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="mosaic first quarter earnings report" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/mos-mosaic-logo.jpg" />Agricultural manufacturer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-mosaic-company/mos/nys">Mosaic Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-mosaic-company/mos/nys">MOS</a>) is trading slightly lower in after hours trading this afternoon after the company posted <a target="_blank" href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/mosaic-reports-fiscal-year-2010-first-quarter-results/rfid257865337?channel=pf">lower than expected earnings</a> for its fiscal first quarter.<br /><br />Going into this afternoon's release, analysts had been expecting to see the company show earnings of 35 cents per share, but the company came in well below this estimate, with actual earnings of just 23 cents per share. <a target="_blank" href="http://247wallst.com/2009/10/05/mosaic-misses-a-low-bar-yet-holds-up-mos/">During the same period last year</a> the company had earnings of $2.65 per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/mosaic-reports-lower-than-expected-first-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mosaic reports lower than expected first quarter earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/mosaic-reports-lower-than-expected-first-quarter-earnings/">Mosaic reports lower than expected first quarter earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/mosaic-reports-lower-than-expected-first-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19185105/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/05/mosaic-reports-lower-than-expected-first-quarter-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>agriculture</category><category>agriculture stocks</category><category>AgricultureStocks</category><category>bad news</category><category>BadNews</category><category>earnings</category><category>MOS</category><category>Mosaic</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nike first quarter earnings results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/nike-first-quarter-earnings-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/nike-first-quarter-earnings-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/nike-first-quarter-earnings-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nke/" rel="tag">NIKE, Inc'B' (NKE)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="nike first quarter earnings" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/nike_160.jpg" />This afternoon, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys">Nike Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys">NKE</a>) reported its fiscal first quarter numbers, and the company was able to put up <a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Earnings/Nike+%28NKE%29+Reports+Q1+EPS+of+%241.04%2C+Beats+by+7c/4978588.html">better than expected earnings numbers</a>, but revenues came in slightly under expectations.<br /><br />As we noted in our <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/28/nike-q1-earnings-preview/">earnings preview yesterday</a>, analysts had been expecting to see the company show earnings of 97 cents per share, and the actual earnings figure was a bit higher at $1.04 per share. For the same period last year the company showed earnings of $1.03 per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/nike-first-quarter-earnings-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nike first quarter earnings results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/nike-first-quarter-earnings-results/">Nike first quarter earnings results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/nike-first-quarter-earnings-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19178535/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/29/nike-first-quarter-earnings-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>apparel</category><category>athletics</category><category>earnings</category><category>good news</category><category>GoodNews</category><category>Nike</category><category>NKE</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analog Devices (ADI) falls on lower profit and weaker margins]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/analog-devices-adi-falls-on-lower-profit-and-weaker-margins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/analog-devices-adi-falls-on-lower-profit-and-weaker-margins/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/analog-devices-adi-falls-on-lower-profit-and-weaker-margins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="analog devices third quarter 09 earnings" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/analog_devices_logo.gif" /> <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/analog-devices-inc/adi/nys">Analog Devices</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/analog-devices-inc/adi/nys">ADI</a>) posted better-than-expected fiscal third quarter results Tuesday after the close. Still, shares were down close to 5% in after-hours trading as the chipmaker reported <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idINN1843861620090818?rpc=44">lower than expected margins</a> in the quarter.<br /><br />The company earned 22 cents per share in the quarter, higher than the 20 cents per share analysts had been expecting. In addition, the company also reported higher revenue numbers than the consensus Street's forecasts.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/analog-devices-adi-falls-on-lower-profit-and-weaker-margins/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Analog Devices (ADI) falls on lower profit and weaker margins</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/analog-devices-adi-falls-on-lower-profit-and-weaker-margins/">Analog Devices (ADI) falls on lower profit and weaker margins</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/analog-devices-adi-falls-on-lower-profit-and-weaker-margins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19133383/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/19/analog-devices-adi-falls-on-lower-profit-and-weaker-margins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADI</category><category>after hours</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>Analog Devices</category><category>AnalogDevices</category><category>chipmaker</category><category>earnings</category><category>gross margins</category><category>GrossMargins</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tech</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nvidia (NVDA) earnings disappoint]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/nvidia-nvda-earnings-disappoint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/nvidia-nvda-earnings-disappoint/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/nvidia-nvda-earnings-disappoint/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/nvda.jpg" alt="" />Semiconductor <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nvidia-corporation/nvda/nas">Nvidia Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nvidia-corporation/nvda/nas">NVDA</a>) had its turn in the earnings parade this afternoon, and the company put up dismal results that <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/02/10/no-love-for-nvidia-nvda/">failed to meet analyst expectations</a>.<br /><br />Going into this afternoon's earnings report, analysts had been expecting to see the company show a loss of $0.09 per share, but the actual EPS for the quarter was a greater loss, one of $0.18 per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/nvidia-nvda-earnings-disappoint/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nvidia (NVDA) earnings disappoint</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/nvidia-nvda-earnings-disappoint/">Nvidia (NVDA) earnings disappoint</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/nvidia-nvda-earnings-disappoint/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1456348/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/10/nvidia-nvda-earnings-disappoint/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>bad news</category><category>BadNews</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings disappointments</category><category>EarningsDisappointments</category><category>NVDA</category><category>Nvidia</category><category>semiconductors</category><category>technology</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple after the bell 05-17-06: black is the new MacBook]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p><img alt="black macbook" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/applemacbookblack.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Apple always has to be different. But today, everyone cheered as the company brought out a version of their pretty laptop, the MacBook, in matt black (yes, that's the same finish as your boring old PC). Our sister site, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/17/hands-on-with-the-apple-macbook/">Engadget, took the MacBook for a spin</a> and declared it "a pretty freaking great value" (but they're not doing black, for the record). The <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=1750">Apple Insider hails</a> the removable (by an actual user!) hard disks. No more purely cosmetic screws!</p>
<p>It wasn't all black hearts and roses, though; <a href="http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=14663&amp;Page=1&amp;pagePos=8"><em>MacWorld UK</em> today mourned the locking down</a> of OS X. Thanks to concerns of piracy, Apple closed down its open source code so that developers can no longer tinker with its operating system. Bad for pirates is also bad for very advanced users; says Tom Yager, "there are ways to address the piracy issue without stripping the critical and defining quality of openness from OS X."</p>
<p>AAPL stock responded by ticking <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/detailedquotes?sym=aapl&amp;exch=USA">up 25 cents to $65.26 on lower-than-average volume</a>. Evidently the market, while intrigued, isn't ready to jump unreservedly on board for black is the new MacBook.</p>
<p>[Photo <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/redjar/147711173/">redjar</a>]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/">Apple after the bell 05-17-06: black is the new MacBook</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 May 2006 18:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/619360/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/17/apple-after-the-bell-05-17-06-black-is-the-new-macbook/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>appl</category><category>apple</category><category>apple black</category><category>apple closing</category><category>apple closing bell</category><category>apple computer</category><category>AppleBlack</category><category>AppleClosing</category><category>AppleClosingBell</category><category>AppleComputer</category><category>black</category><category>black apple</category><category>black macbook</category><category>BlackApple</category><category>BlackMacbook</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>macbook</category><category>new apple</category><category>new apple computer</category><category>NewApple</category><category>NewAppleComputer</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 05-04-06: it's buy time, baby]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/quote-msft_endofday_05042006.JPG" alt="microsoft intraday chart05-04-06" />Investors may finally have heard the credulity of people like <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/">me</a>,<a href="http://aol.fool.com/News/mft/2006/mft06050323.htm?logvisit=y&amp;source=eptaollnk308100&amp;npu=y">Tim Beyersof Motley Fool</a>, and any number of Microsoft employees. The stock <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/detailedquotes?exch=USA&amp;sym=MSFT&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;daysb4=&amp;freq=1">tradedup 27 cents, or 1.17%, to $23.44</a> on about-average volume. Of course, the stock still sits at its lowest price in thelast four years, despite the fact that the company is both (a) profitable and (b) still dominating the world in itsusual way.<br /><br />Oddly, the price increase came on a day in which the Microsoft news was dominated by a rathernegative spin; everyone is wondering why the company changed the name of MSN adCenter to Microsoft adCenter. <ahref="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060504-020318">Says Jennifer Slegg of Search Engine Watch</a>, "I amnot sure that rebranding from MSN to Microsoft is the best decision for adCenter, but it is certainly a decision thatwill get people talking." Evidently, talk is enough for a 1% runup. As Martha says, that's a good thing.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/">Microsoft after the bell 05-04-06: it's buy time, baby</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 May 2006 19:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/615077/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/04/microsoft-after-the-bell-05-04-06-its-buy-time-baby/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$23.44</category><category>after hours</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>buy microsoft</category><category>buy msft</category><category>BuyMicrosoft</category><category>BuyMsft</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft buy</category><category>microsoft close</category><category>MicrosoftBuy</category><category>MicrosoftClose</category><category>msft</category><category>msft close</category><category>MsftClose</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 19:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 5-03-06: four-year low, Fool says don't sell!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="msft chart may 3 "src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/quote-msft_endofday_05032006.JPG" />I'd like to know what all thosesellers are thinking. Really! I mean, look at this chart. There we have it, down down and more down. <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=NAS&amp;from=his&amp;sym=E%3ANAS%3AMSFT#">MSFT is now at its52-week low</a> -- in fact, the stock hasn't been this low since October 4, 2002. I know! Today, the stock closed at$23.17, down 3.5%. It's now trading 15% below its high last week. Ouch. Guess everyone <em>does</em> believe <ahref="http://msft.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/">Gartner'sreport about Vista delays</a>.<br /><br />Those who are selling right now? In my opinion, it's irrational depression.Why sell at the low? Panic, I suppose, but it seems highly, um, foolish. <ahref="http://aol.fool.com/News/mft/2006/mft06050323.htm?logvisit=y&amp;source=eptaollnk308100&amp;npu=y">Tim Beyers, hewho is Motley Foolish but not, you know, foolish, agrees</a>. He argues that, even if you buy the idea that Microsoftmight be taking second fiddle to Google (the <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/">Evil-Empire</a>-come-lately),it's still a good company to own. After all, they are rife with cash-ola and they absolutely, totally dominate theaverage laptop. Come on now, look around you at the coffee shop. How many laptops don't have Windows-based software?<br/><br />Unless you're tapping away at my favorite worker-owned coffee collective (where everyone either has an iBook ora built-from-scratch Linux geek-machine), the answer is: few. If I owned Mr. Softee right now, I'd be holding. And if Iowned a pile full of cash right now, I'd be buying. There may be more down. But I'd bet at least some of my children'sfuture on the long-term <em>up</em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/">Microsoft after the bell 5-03-06: four-year low, Fool says don't sell!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 May 2006 17:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/614665/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/03/microsoft-at-the-bell-5-03-06-four-year-low-fool-says-dont-se/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4-year low</category><category>4-yearLow</category><category>52-week low</category><category>52-weekLow</category><category>after hours</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>at the bell</category><category>AtTheBell</category><category>close</category><category>closing bell</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>end of day</category><category>EndOfDay</category><category>fool</category><category>foolish</category><category>four-year low</category><category>Four-yearLow</category><category>low</category><category>microsoft down</category><category>MicrosoftDown</category><category>motley fool</category><category>MotleyFool</category><category>msft at the bell</category><category>msft close</category><category>msft down</category><category>msft low</category><category>MsftAtTheBell</category><category>MsftClose</category><category>MsftDown</category><category>MsftLow</category><category>tim beyers</category><category>TimBeyers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 17:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft after the bell 5-02-06: Vista delayed, stock price hits floor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="microsoft chart, end of day may 2, 2006"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/quote-msft_endofday_05022006.JPG" />As Microsoft shareholders let outa gigantic sigh that erased $2.8 billion in market cap, the company's stock flirted with its 52-week low of $24.00during the afternoon. It finally closed <em>just barely</em> above that solid line, at $24.01.<br /><br />Contributingto the terrible performance and two-and-a-half-times-average volume: <ahref="http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/02/technology/microsoft_vista.reut/index.htm">the prediction by Gartner</a> thatMicrosoft's latest and greatest (?) operating system, Vista, might be delayed another three months. According to <ahref="http://spaces.msn.com/adacosta/blog/cns%21E8E5CC039D51E3DB%214198.entry">one Microsoft employee</a>, it's so nottrue, and Microsoft insists that it will still make the November 2006 (volume license customers) and January 2007(everybody else) launch dates. Shareholders? Clearly are not drinking the Kool-aid.<br /><br />Say it with me [longdeep breath] <em>***SIGH***</em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/">Microsoft after the bell 5-02-06: Vista delayed, stock price hits floor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 May 2006 16:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/02/technology/microsoft_vista.reut/index.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/614226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/02/microsoft-after-the-bell-5-02-06-vista-delayed-stock-price-hit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>$24.01</category><category>after hours</category><category>after the bell</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>AfterTheBell</category><category>closing bell</category><category>closing price</category><category>ClosingBell</category><category>ClosingPrice</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msft closing bell</category><category>msft closing price</category><category>MsftClosingBell</category><category>MsftClosingPrice</category><category>vista</category><category>vista delay</category><category>vista delayed</category><category>vista operating system</category><category>vista os</category><category>VistaDelay</category><category>VistaDelayed</category><category>VistaOperatingSystem</category><category>VistaOs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 16:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay bums out the street with Q1 results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/ebay-bums-out-the-street-with-q1-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/ebay-bums-out-the-street-with-q1-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/ebay-bums-out-the-street-with-q1-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p>I just got off eBay's first quarter earnings call and no longer&nbsp;am I quite so&nbsp;surprised that the stock soldoff in after-hours trading after&nbsp;the auction giant released its results. The stock fell 5% to $38.42 after today's5 p.m. ET announcement.&nbsp;</p>
<p>On the face of it, the results weren't bad. EBay met Wall Street's estimates andexceeded its own guidance -- although it did some weird monkeying around with "non-GAAP" results that used tobe known as "pro-forma" and would have been higher if it weren't for stock option expensing and new accountingrules.&nbsp;(Just give us the&nbsp;straight scoop, next time, okay?). </p>
<p>The release's second&nbsp;subhead was areal grabber: "Q1 GAAP Diluted EPS of $0.17 and Non-GAAP (pro forma) Diluted EPS of $0.24." Catchy,right?</p>
<p>But that's not why the stock sold off. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/ebay-bums-out-the-street-with-q1-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eBay bums out the street with Q1 results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/ebay-bums-out-the-street-with-q1-results/">eBay bums out the street with Q1 results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://investor.ebay.com/financial.cfm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/ebay-bums-out-the-street-with-q1-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/610081/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/19/ebay-bums-out-the-street-with-q1-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>after hours</category><category>AfterHours</category><category>auction</category><category>bob swan</category><category>BobSwan</category><category>earnings</category><category>eBay</category><category>meg whitman</category><category>MegWhitman</category><category>online</category><category>quarter</category><category>shopping</category><category>trading</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:11:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
