<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Airlines Spanked with $4.6 Billion Loss Last Year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/united.jpg" />The fact that 769.6 million passengers stepped onto planes in the U.S. last year sounds pretty impressive, right? Well, it's 5.3% less impressive than the year before, when 812.3 million boarded flights ... not to mention the 838.2 million in 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/2010-03-29-airline-passengers-revenue-decline_N.htm" target="_blank">The airline industry has spent the past two years getting brutalized</a> by the global <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/recession/">recession</a>, which finally pushed it below the 800 million passenger threshold for the first time since 2004, when 763.7 million passengers took to the skies.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Airlines Spanked with $4.6 Billion Loss Last Year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/">Airlines Spanked with $4.6 Billion Loss Last Year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19419560/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMR Finds New Way to Nickel and Dime You]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/amr-finds-new-way-to-nickel-and-dime-you/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/amr-finds-new-way-to-nickel-and-dime-you/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/amr-finds-new-way-to-nickel-and-dime-you/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bbby/" rel="tag">Bed Bath and Beyond (BBBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/aa-logo-240.gif" alt="" />American Airlines (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys" target="_blank">AMR</a>) has become about as low-rent as one could imagine. I can stomach paying to check bags and for snacks. To me, it makes sense, as they provide important revenue streams and strike me as products and services for which it's possible to charge with little disruption to the passenger experience. <br />
<br />
But, as of May 1, 2010, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/2010-02-09-american09_ST_N.htm" target="_blank">the airline will be charging $8 for a blanket and inflatable neck pillow on flights lasting more than two hours</a> - including flights to Hawaii, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and Central America. But, for your trouble, American will toss in a $10 coupon towards a purchase of more than $30 from Bed Bath &amp; Beyond (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/bed-bath-and-beyond-inc/bbby/nas" target="_blank">BBBY</a>). <br />
<br />
Of course, on flights lasting less than two hours, American's policy is BYO. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gadling.com/2010/02/09/american-airlines-removes-free-blankets/">If you want to stay warm, cram your own blanket into your carry-on</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/amr-finds-new-way-to-nickel-and-dime-you/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMR Finds New Way to Nickel and Dime You</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/amr-finds-new-way-to-nickel-and-dime-you/">AMR Finds New Way to Nickel and Dime You</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/2010-02-09-american09_ST_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/amr-finds-new-way-to-nickel-and-dime-you/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19350344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/amr-finds-new-way-to-nickel-and-dime-you/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline fees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AMR</category><category>AMR Corp.</category><category>AmrCorp.</category><category>BBBY</category><category>Bed Bath and Beyond</category><category>bed bath beyond</category><category>featured</category><category>tourism and travel</category><category>Tourism industry</category><category>travel</category><category>travel industry</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UAL has almost good news for third quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a></p><div style="DISPLAY: block" id="imageResults"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/unitedlogo.png" />The skies are starting to look a little friendlier to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">United Airlines</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">UAUA</a>). <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33403875/ns/business-earnings/" target="_blank">The airline reported a quarterly loss that was lower than expected</a>. Third quarter traffic was off only 2.9%, but because United used discounts to fill seats, revenue fell 20.3% (to $4.43 billion). The key to a recovery will be getting passengers to shell out for more expensive seats. According to United's president, John Tague, "There's no opportunity here for a full revenue recovery until we get premium cabin pricing back." He doesn't know how long this is going to take, but does say that he's seen progress over the past few months.<br /><br />Nonetheless, it's important not to confuse "not so bad" with "making money." UAL lost $57 million (39 cents a share) last quarter. If it hadn't had some good news on fuel hedges and accounting issues, the loss would have been 43 cents a share. Again, this is better than analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected: they were forecasting a loss of 94 cents per share. And, the third quarter loss was much better than last year's $792 million for the third quarter. <br /><br />But, it all comes down to the bottom line, and a loss is a loss is a loss.</div>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UAL has almost good news for third quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/">UAL has almost good news for third quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33403875/ns/business-earnings/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19203408/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineFees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ual</category><category>ual corporation</category><category>ualcorp</category><category>UalCorporation</category><category>uaua</category><category>united airlines</category><category>UnitedAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Extra airline fees to become the new 'normal']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-18-200cm101608.jpg" />If you think all those new <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airlinefees/">airline fees</a> were a temporary measure to help these beleaguered companies through an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/economiccrisis/">economic crisis</a>, you're out of your mind. Now that they've had a taste of how much they can make by charging you for an extra bag or a little more leg room, they're hooked. More important, the fees are making up a meaningful portion of airline revenues and profits, so investors aren't likely to be satisfied with a return to normal - well, they can't. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59F3UI20091016" target="_blank">Extra fees are the new "normal."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Extra airline fees to become the new 'normal'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/">Extra airline fees to become the new 'normal'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59F3UI20091016>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19198902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineFees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>amrcorp</category><category>AmrCorp.</category><category>boeing</category><category>ual</category><category>ualcorp</category><category>uaua</category><category>united airlines</category><category>UnitedAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hefty airline fees making (not enough of) a difference]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/hefty-airline-fees-making-not-enough-of-a-difference/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/hefty-airline-fees-making-not-enough-of-a-difference/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/hefty-airline-fees-making-not-enough-of-a-difference/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/deltalobby.jpg" width="220" height="165" alt="" />Bigger fees are compensating for shorter flight manifests. For the first half of 2009, airlines in the United States have raked in <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/2009-09-24-airlines-fees-revenue_N.htm" target="_blank">$3.8 billion from cancellation, re-booking, checked bag and other fees</a>. Data from the U.S. Department of Transportation puts this result up from the $2.3 billion airlines generated from these fees in the first half of 2008.</p>
<p>While passengers haven't been thrilled with these additional charges, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airlines/">airlines</a> have had to compensate for a significant drop in passenger traffic, as the industry copes with the worst travel session since the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/hefty-airline-fees-making-not-enough-of-a-difference/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hefty airline fees making (not enough of) a difference</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/hefty-airline-fees-making-not-enough-of-a-difference/">Hefty airline fees making (not enough of) a difference</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/hefty-airline-fees-making-not-enough-of-a-difference/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19173783/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/25/hefty-airline-fees-making-not-enough-of-a-difference/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>baggage</category><category>baggage fees</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-18-200cm101608.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR</a>) got spanked in the second quarter, as frequent fliers kept their feet on the ground. The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-15-amr-loss_N.htm">American Airlines parent posted a $390 million loss</a> in a quarter that historically has been kind to travel companies. AMR rationalizes the results with the thought that the loss would have been only $319 million ($1.14 per share) if charges related to selling and grounding planes were excluded. This would have put the airline ahead of analyst expectations of a $1.28 per share loss. AMR's Q2 revenue fell 21% to $4.89 billion.</p>
<p>And, it's far better than the airline's performance in the second quarter of 2008.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/">AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-15-amr-loss_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099162/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineFees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>amrcorp</category><category>AmrCorp.</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>global recession</category><category>GlobalRecession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Online travel to become cheaper in market share play]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/expe/" rel="tag">Expedia Inc (EXPE)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/priceline.jpg" />Desperate times <strike>call for desperate measures</strike> benefit consumers. As online travel agencies slug it out in the hunt for market share, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE5504E120090601" target="_blank">many are starting to cut booking fees</a> -- ironically, in stark contrast to <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/05/14/misery-works-airlines-making-money-on-baggage-fees/" target="_blank">what the airlines themselves are doing</a>. While the airlines are looking to squeeze every last ounce of revenue from each passenger mile, the websites that put people in seats are hungry for any competitive advantage they can find. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/orbitz-worldwide-inc/oww/nys" target="_blank">Orbitz Worldwide</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/orbitz-worldwide-inc/oww/nys" target="_blank">OWW</a>) has permanently kicked its airline booking fees on both domestic and international flights. Travelocity is following suit, to a limited extent, at least, by continuing to wave booking fees ... a measure that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expedia-inc-del/expe/nas" target="_blank">Expedia Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expedia-inc-del/expe/nas" target="_blank">EXPE</a>) is taking, as well. What started as promotions are fast becoming the norm.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Online travel to become cheaper in market share play</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/">Online travel to become cheaper in market share play</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE5504E120090601>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19054320/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>expedia</category><category>expedia.com</category><category>featured</category><category>orbitz</category><category>orbitz worldwide</category><category>orbitz.com</category><category>priceline</category><category>priceline.com</category><category>travel site</category><category>travel sites</category><category>travel web sites</category><category>travel website</category><category>travelocity</category><category>travelocity.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ryanair annoyance fees could be top-line advantage]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/ryanair.jpg" />Passenger annoyance has been on the rise over the past year, as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airlines/">airlines</a> have found new and unusual fees to charge passengers. European low-cost carrier <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ryanair-holdings-plc-american-depositary-shares/ryaay/nas" target="_blank">Ryanair</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ryanair-holdings-plc-american-depositary-shares/ryaay/nas" target="_blank">RYAAY</a>) has been at the tip of the spear, at one point considering a <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/02/28/ryanair-to-pay-to-pee-or-not-to-pay-to-pee/" target="_blank">charge for access to the lavatory</a>. The hidden secret in all this is that it works.</p>
<p>Ryanair's latest fee is nothing short of brilliant. The airline is now slapping customers with <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/05/19/ryanair-print-your-tickets-at-home-or-not-you-pay/" target="_blank">a &euro;10 ($14) charge for printing boarding passes at home</a> ... and &euro;40 ($55) to do so at the airport. Since there's no other way to get your boarding pass, this translates to a minimum fee of $14 per flight (with a few small exceptions). Given the company's price advantage in the short-haul European space, the move is unlikely to drive passengers to competitors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ryanair annoyance fees could be top-line advantage</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/">Ryanair annoyance fees could be top-line advantage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 May 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gadling.com/2009/05/19/ryanair-print-your-tickets-at-home-or-not-you-pay/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1555199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>low cost</category><category>low cost carrier</category><category>low cost carriers</category><category>ryanair</category><category>ryanair stealth charges</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
