<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Southwest Airlines to Purchase AirTran]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/southwest-airlines-to-acquire-airtran/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/southwest-airlines-to-acquire-airtran/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/southwest-airlines-to-acquire-airtran/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Southwest Airlines (LUV) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/07/southwestairlineslogo.jpg" />More Monday merger fun, this time from the airline sector. Reportedly, Southwest Airlines (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys" target="_blank">LUV</a>) announced that it will <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/southwest-airlines-to-buy-airtran-for/1295554/" target="_blank">purchase AirTran Airlines for roughly $1.42 billion</a>.</p>
<p>This move will be funded mainly with debt, and it will help Southwest establish a larger presence in cities like Boston and New York. What's more (as the article points out), Southwest will now be in "head-to-head competition with Delta Air Lines in Delta's home base of Atlanta."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/southwest-airlines-to-acquire-airtran/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Southwest Airlines to Purchase AirTran</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/southwest-airlines-to-acquire-airtran/">Southwest Airlines to Purchase AirTran</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/southwest-airlines-to-acquire-airtran/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19649752/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/27/southwest-airlines-to-acquire-airtran/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline mergers</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirTran</category><category>CAL</category><category>Continental</category><category>DAL</category><category>Delta</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Southwest</category><category>travel</category><category>UAL</category><category>UAUA</category><category>United Airlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[United Airlines and US Airways Discussing Possible Merger]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/united-airlines-and-us-airways-discussing-possible-merger/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/united-airlines-and-us-airways-discussing-possible-merger/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/united-airlines-and-us-airways-discussing-possible-merger/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/united-logo-240.jpg" />On Wednesday evening, reports began to surface that UAL Corp (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">UAUA</a>) and U.S. Airways (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/u-s-airways-group-inc/lcc/nys" target="_blank">LCC</a>) may be discussing a merger. <em>The New York Times</em> noted that the two airlines are "deep" in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/08/business/08air.html?hp" target="_blank">merger discussions</a>, which would create the nation's second-biggest airline. According to the report, this is the third time in the past decade that the two have talked merger. Will this time be different? <br />
<br />
I honestly believe that this time will be different, in large part because of the economy. As <em>The Times</em> points out, Southwest Airlines (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys" class="inlinked">LUV</a>) was the only low-cost air carrier to turn a profit last year. A merger between UAUA and LCC could turn the companies a profit faster than as separate entities.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/united-airlines-and-us-airways-discussing-possible-merger/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>United Airlines and US Airways Discussing Possible Merger</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/united-airlines-and-us-airways-discussing-possible-merger/">United Airlines and US Airways Discussing Possible Merger</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/united-airlines-and-us-airways-discussing-possible-merger/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19431285/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/08/united-airlines-and-us-airways-discussing-possible-merger/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airlines</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lcc</category><category>merger</category><category>uaua</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Airlines Spanked with $4.6 Billion Loss Last Year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/united.jpg" />The fact that 769.6 million passengers stepped onto planes in the U.S. last year sounds pretty impressive, right? Well, it's 5.3% less impressive than the year before, when 812.3 million boarded flights ... not to mention the 838.2 million in 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/2010-03-29-airline-passengers-revenue-decline_N.htm" target="_blank">The airline industry has spent the past two years getting brutalized</a> by the global <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/recession/">recession</a>, which finally pushed it below the 800 million passenger threshold for the first time since 2004, when 763.7 million passengers took to the skies.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Airlines Spanked with $4.6 Billion Loss Last Year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/">Airlines Spanked with $4.6 Billion Loss Last Year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19419560/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/30/airlines-spanked-with-4-6-billion-loss-last-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>inthenews</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Airline Alliance Set to Clear Antitrust Hurdle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/earnsamr240.jpg" alt="" />An new international alliance of airlines has gained tentative approval from the U.S. Department of Transportation. The alliance, dubbed "Oneworld Airline," would include partners British Airways (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/british-airways-plc-s-adr/bairy/nao">BAIRY</a>), Iberia Airlines, Finnair, Royal Jordanian Airlines and American Airlines (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR</a>).</p>
<p>Final approval by remains contingent upon certain conditions, including the requirement that the alliance relinquish a percentage of its highly valued takeoff and landing slots at London's Heathrow Airport. Members of the alliance have also offered the possibility of sharing transatlantic routes with competitors in an effort to quell fears of unfair competition which are being expressed from within the European Union.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Airline Alliance Set to Clear Antitrust Hurdle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/">Airline Alliance Set to Clear Antitrust Hurdle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19357952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>alliance</category><category>American Airlines</category><category>AMR</category><category>BAIRY</category><category>Department of Transportation</category><category>DOT</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Hughes</category><category>oneworld</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[United Airlines Buys On-Time Success]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/united-airlines-buys-on-time-success/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/united-airlines-buys-on-time-success/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/united-airlines-buys-on-time-success/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/united-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />The silver lining to the travel slump last year was that fewer flights made it easier for airlines to hit their deadlines. In 2009, the airline sector had its best year for on-time arrivals since 2003, largely because many routes were cut as passenger traffic fell and companies looked for ways to cut costs. According to the Department of Transportation, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35367302/ns/travel-news/">airlines hit a 79.5% on-time rate</a> last year (which includes flights that were within 15 minutes of their arrival time).</p>
<p>Hawaiian Airlines had the best record, but it's a small regional, lacking the challenges of the major carriers. Among the big guys, Southwest's (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/southwest-airlines-co/luv/nys">LUV</a>) 83% on-time rate was best, and United's (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas">UAUA</a>) 81% was tops for traditional air carriers. Of course, these airlines and the rest of the sector were helped along by the fact that they pad their schedule, which makes it a hell of a lot easier to show up on time.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/united-airlines-buys-on-time-success/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>United Airlines Buys On-Time Success</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/united-airlines-buys-on-time-success/">United Airlines Buys On-Time Success</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/united-airlines-buys-on-time-success/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19357155/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/14/united-airlines-buys-on-time-success/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>dal</category><category>delta</category><category>inthenews</category><category>luv</category><category>southwest airlines</category><category>UAL</category><category>UalCorp</category><category>UAUA</category><category>United Airlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Continental CEO Not Taking a Dime Until Profit Comes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/continental-ceo-not-taking-a-dime-until-profit-comes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/continental-ceo-not-taking-a-dime-until-profit-comes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/continental-ceo-not-taking-a-dime-until-profit-comes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/continental-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />No profit no bonus -- hell, make that no salary. The new CEO of Continental Airlines (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys" target="_blank">CAL</a>), Jeffery Smisek, says <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2010-01-04-continental-ceo_N.htm" target="_blank">he won't take any salary or annual bonus until he brings the airline to profitability</a>. <br /><br />Smisek took the top job at Continental after the previous CEO, Lawrence Kellner, left the gig to go to a private equity firm. Last year, the firm lost $367 million in the first three quarters. A Thomson Reuters survey of analysts expects a fourth quarter loss of at least $38 million, though they're looking for a profit of at least $190 million for this year. So, Wall Street has already set Smisek's goal for him.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/continental-ceo-not-taking-a-dime-until-profit-comes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Continental CEO Not Taking a Dime Until Profit Comes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/continental-ceo-not-taking-a-dime-until-profit-comes/">Continental CEO Not Taking a Dime Until Profit Comes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/2010-01-04-continental-ceo_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/continental-ceo-not-taking-a-dime-until-profit-comes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19303213/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/05/continental-ceo-not-taking-a-dime-until-profit-comes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>continental</category><category>Continental airlines</category><category>ContinentalAirlines</category><category>featured</category><category>tourism and travel</category><category>TourismAndTravel</category><category>travel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Low cost carriers own 30% of domestic airline biz, growing fast]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/low-cost-carriers-own-30-of-domestic-airline-biz-growing-fast/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/low-cost-carriers-own-30-of-domestic-airline-biz-growing-fast/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/low-cost-carriers-own-30-of-domestic-airline-biz-growing-fast/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lcc/" rel="tag">US Airways Group (LCC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/luv-southwest-airlines-logo.jpg" />For years, it's been evident that smaller <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airlines/">airlines</a> have had an operating advantage, particularly when they use less expensive airports. They've been able to post better numbers as a result, and in the current travel slump, they've outperformed the larger carriers. Well, they've also picked up a considerable amount of market share.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-11-10-airshuffle10_CV_N.htm" target="_blank">According to a report by <em>USA Today</em></a>, low cost carriers now have 30% of the market in the United States. Price-sensitive consumers are turning to cheaper alternatives, even if it means (for fliers with elite status) giving up the perks they've earned through years of customer loyalty.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/low-cost-carriers-own-30-of-domestic-airline-biz-growing-fast/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Low cost carriers own 30% of domestic airline biz, growing fast</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/low-cost-carriers-own-30-of-domestic-airline-biz-growing-fast/">Low cost carriers own 30% of domestic airline biz, growing fast</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-11-10-airshuffle10_CV_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/low-cost-carriers-own-30-of-domestic-airline-biz-growing-fast/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19231126/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/10/low-cost-carriers-own-30-of-domestic-airline-biz-growing-fast/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aai</category><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>airtrain</category><category>dal</category><category>delta</category><category>deltaairlines</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jblu</category><category>jetblue</category><category>jetblueairways</category><category>laguardia</category><category>laguardia international airport</category><category>lcc</category><category>low cost</category><category>low cost carrier</category><category>low cost carriers</category><category>luv</category><category>southwest</category><category>southwest airlines</category><category>uaua</category><category>united airlines</category><category>us air</category><category>us airways</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMR: Q3 could have been worse; AirTran solid]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/amr-q3-could-have-been-worse-airtran-solid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/amr-q3-could-have-been-worse-airtran-solid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/amr-q3-could-have-been-worse-airtran-solid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-18-200cm101608.jpg" /><a href="http://www.aa.com" target="_blank">American Airlines</a> had yet another difficult quarter, not unexpected in what has become an incredibly deep travel slump. The carrier's parent company, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys" target="_blank">AMR Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys" target="_blank">AMR</a>), reported a third quarter loss of $359 million, largely because there aren't as many business travelers taking to the skies. Corporate travel budgets in all industries are having an effect on all airlines, including AMR.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-10-21-american-third-quarter-loss_N.htm" target="_blank">Revenue plunged 20.2%</a> year-over-year for the third quarter for the nation's second airline. The loss comes after a $31 million gain last year. This quarter's losses would have been slightly better if write-downs for sold or grounded aircraft were excluded -- the loss would have been $265 million (93 cents a share) on revenue of $5.09 billion. With the write-downs, revenue clocked in at $5.13 billion. Cheaper fuel made the quarter a little easier for AMR to bear, as well, with this expense down 47% year-over-year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/amr-q3-could-have-been-worse-airtran-solid/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMR: Q3 could have been worse; AirTran solid</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/amr-q3-could-have-been-worse-airtran-solid/">AMR: Q3 could have been worse; AirTran solid</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/amr-q3-could-have-been-worse-airtran-solid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19205380/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/amr-q3-could-have-been-worse-airtran-solid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airline stocks</category><category>airlines</category><category>american airlines</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>corporate travel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>travel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[UAL has almost good news for third quarter]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a></p><div style="DISPLAY: block" id="imageResults"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/unitedlogo.png" />The skies are starting to look a little friendlier to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">United Airlines</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">UAUA</a>). <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33403875/ns/business-earnings/" target="_blank">The airline reported a quarterly loss that was lower than expected</a>. Third quarter traffic was off only 2.9%, but because United used discounts to fill seats, revenue fell 20.3% (to $4.43 billion). The key to a recovery will be getting passengers to shell out for more expensive seats. According to United's president, John Tague, "There's no opportunity here for a full revenue recovery until we get premium cabin pricing back." He doesn't know how long this is going to take, but does say that he's seen progress over the past few months.<br /><br />Nonetheless, it's important not to confuse "not so bad" with "making money." UAL lost $57 million (39 cents a share) last quarter. If it hadn't had some good news on fuel hedges and accounting issues, the loss would have been 43 cents a share. Again, this is better than analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected: they were forecasting a loss of 94 cents per share. And, the third quarter loss was much better than last year's $792 million for the third quarter. <br /><br />But, it all comes down to the bottom line, and a loss is a loss is a loss.</div>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>UAL has almost good news for third quarter</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/">UAL has almost good news for third quarter</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33403875/ns/business-earnings/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19203408/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/ual-has-almost-good-news-for-third-quarter/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineFees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ual</category><category>ual corporation</category><category>ualcorp</category><category>UalCorporation</category><category>uaua</category><category>united airlines</category><category>UnitedAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Extra airline fees to become the new 'normal']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ba/" rel="tag">Boeing Co (BA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-18-200cm101608.jpg" />If you think all those new <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airlinefees/">airline fees</a> were a temporary measure to help these beleaguered companies through an <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/economiccrisis/">economic crisis</a>, you're out of your mind. Now that they've had a taste of how much they can make by charging you for an extra bag or a little more leg room, they're hooked. More important, the fees are making up a meaningful portion of airline revenues and profits, so investors aren't likely to be satisfied with a return to normal - well, they can't. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59F3UI20091016" target="_blank">Extra fees are the new "normal."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Extra airline fees to become the new 'normal'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/">Extra airline fees to become the new 'normal'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE59F3UI20091016>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19198902/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/16/extra-airline-fees-to-become-the-new-normal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineFees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>amrcorp</category><category>AmrCorp.</category><category>boeing</category><category>ual</category><category>ualcorp</category><category>uaua</category><category>united airlines</category><category>UnitedAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cheaper business class not helping airlines]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/cheaper-business-class-not-helping-airlines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/cheaper-business-class-not-helping-airlines/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/cheaper-business-class-not-helping-airlines/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/airport.jpg" />Business travelers still aren't coming back to the good seats, despite <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airlines/">airlines</a>' best efforts. FareCompare.com reports that many business class tickets to Europe are going to be 33% to 66% cheaper this fall relative to last year. Companies are being careful with their cash - which means stacking people in coach rather than giving them a little leg room on overseas flights. With back-of-the-plane tickets going for a quarter of the price (or less) than their business class equivalents, this isn't exactly shocking. </p>
<p>On Wednesday, <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">Delta</a>'s (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys">DAL</a>) cheapest NYC-to-London's cheapest roundtrip coach fare was $716 (for an October 23 departure and October 30 return), <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/2009-10-08-business-airfares_N.htm">according to a report in <em>USA Today</em></a>. To take the same trip in business class, you were looking at a hefty $4,634. So, even though prices are down year-over-year, it doesn't mean that business travelers are being allowed to enjoy the opportunity.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/cheaper-business-class-not-helping-airlines/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cheaper business class not helping airlines</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/cheaper-business-class-not-helping-airlines/">Cheaper business class not helping airlines</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/travel/2009-10-08-business-airfares_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/cheaper-business-class-not-helping-airlines/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19190607/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/09/cheaper-business-class-not-helping-airlines/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>business class</category><category>business class flight</category><category>business travel</category><category>BusinessClass</category><category>BusinessClassFlight</category><category>BusinessTravel</category><category>coach class syndrome</category><category>CoachClassSyndrome</category><category>delta</category><category>deltaairlines</category><category>iata</category><category>international air transport association</category><category>InternationalAirTransportAssociation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>national business travel association</category><category>NationalBusinessTravelAssociation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Delta exploring stake in Japan Airlines]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/delta-exploring-stake-in-japan-airlines/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/delta-exploring-stake-in-japan-airlines/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/delta-exploring-stake-in-japan-airlines/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/healthier-flight-200mk082807.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys" target="_blank">Delta Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/delta-air-lines-inc-del/dal/nys" target="_blank">DAL</a>) is looking to buy a piece of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/japan-airlines-corporation/jalsy/nao" target="_blank">Japan Airlines</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/japan-airlines-corporation/jalsy/nao" target="_blank">JALSY</a>). The move could give the world's largest airline access to more cities in Japan. </p>
<p>A source close to the talks says that the investment would be several hundred million dollars and would open the door for an alliance between the two that would allow each airline to book passengers on the other's flights.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/delta-exploring-stake-in-japan-airlines/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Delta exploring stake in Japan Airlines</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/delta-exploring-stake-in-japan-airlines/">Delta exploring stake in Japan Airlines</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/delta-exploring-stake-in-japan-airlines/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19159226/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/13/delta-exploring-stake-in-japan-airlines/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>delta</category><category>inthenews</category><category>japan airlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Airlines stuck with double-digit revenue drop]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/airlines-stuck-with-double-digit-revenue-drop/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/airlines-stuck-with-double-digit-revenue-drop/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/airlines-stuck-with-double-digit-revenue-drop/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/luv/" rel="tag">Southwest Airlines (LUV)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="180" border="1" align="right" width="240" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/deltalobby.jpg" alt="" />The Air Transport Association announced that <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32499411/ns/business/" target="_blank">passenger revenue plunged 21% in July</a> relative to the same month last year. This was the ninth month in a row that the industry has had to contend with what has been a brutal market for a perpetually beleaguered business. </p>
<p>The number of passengers hopping on flights fell 4% from July 2008 to July 2009, and the revenue situation wasn't helped by a decline of 18% in the average price a passenger paid to fly one mile. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/airlines-stuck-with-double-digit-revenue-drop/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Airlines stuck with double-digit revenue drop</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/airlines-stuck-with-double-digit-revenue-drop/">Airlines stuck with double-digit revenue drop</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32499411/ns/business/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/airlines-stuck-with-double-digit-revenue-drop/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19136104/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/21/airlines-stuck-with-double-digit-revenue-drop/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airlines</category><category>cargo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>leisure</category><category>tourism</category><category>tourism industry</category><category>TourismIndustry</category><category>travel</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Singapore Airlines loss 'almost certain']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/singapore-airlines-loss-almost-certain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/singapore-airlines-loss-almost-certain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/singapore-airlines-loss-almost-certain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/logo_singair_120_90.gif" alt="" />Staff cuts are coming for <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/singapore-airlines-ltd-sia/singf/nao">Singapore Airlines</a> (OTC: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/singapore-airlines-ltd-sia/singf/nao">SINGF</a>) with calendar Q2 "almost certain" to be a money-loser. This won't be a first for the carrier, but it's definitely rare. Since going public in 1985, <a target="_blank" href="http://business.asiaone.com/Business/News/Office/Story/A1Story20090717-155428.html">SINGF has only had one quarterly loss until now</a>. It took the SARS epidemic to put this company into the red for three months, back in 2003. According to four of the five analysts polled, there was little the company could do to avert the situation. </p>
<p>In a respectable move, the staff cuts are following that of the executive team, which has had 10% to 20% sliced from its salaries. An operating loss of $50 million or more for Q2 will cause staff paychecks to fall by at least 2.5%. SINGF is on the hook to cut 25% of the "monthly variable component" (MVC) that's included in staff salaries if the airline's loss pierces the $50 million threshold. MVC disappears in its entirety if the loss passes the $200 million mark. Currently, MVC accounts for only 10% of employees' total compensation. </p>
<p>Employees have already been chipping in to reduce the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airline/">airline</a>'s costs. Pilots, for example, have sacrificed 65% of a day's pay every month, and employees in general are working shorter weeks. </p>
<p>But, this hasn't been enough.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/singapore-airlines-loss-almost-certain/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Singapore Airlines loss 'almost certain'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/singapore-airlines-loss-almost-certain/">Singapore Airlines loss 'almost certain'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://business.asiaone.com/Business/News/Office/Story/A1Story20090717-155428.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/singapore-airlines-loss-almost-certain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19103087/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/20/singapore-airlines-loss-almost-certain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>sars</category><category>singapore</category><category>singapore airlines</category><category>SingaporeAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-18-200cm101608.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR</a>) got spanked in the second quarter, as frequent fliers kept their feet on the ground. The <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-15-amr-loss_N.htm">American Airlines parent posted a $390 million loss</a> in a quarter that historically has been kind to travel companies. AMR rationalizes the results with the thought that the loss would have been only $319 million ($1.14 per share) if charges related to selling and grounding planes were excluded. This would have put the airline ahead of analyst expectations of a $1.28 per share loss. AMR's Q2 revenue fell 21% to $4.89 billion.</p>
<p>And, it's far better than the airline's performance in the second quarter of 2008.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/">AMR loses in Q2, however you measure it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-15-amr-loss_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099162/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/15/amr-loses-in-q2-however-you-measure-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineFees</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>amrcorp</category><category>AmrCorp.</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>global recession</category><category>GlobalRecession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DOT overrides Justice, Continental Airlines wins antitrust relief]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amr/" rel="tag">AMR Corp (AMR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cal/" rel="tag">Contl Airlines'B' (CAL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/uaua/" rel="tag">UAL Corp (UAUA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dal/" rel="tag">Delta Air Lines (DAL)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/cal-continental-airlines-logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys" target="_blank">Continental Airlines</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/continental-airlines-inc/cal/nys" target="_blank">CAL</a>) just <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-10-continental-ati-ok_N.htm" target="_blank">got the relief it needs to compete</a>. Despite resistance from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofJustice/">Department of Justice</a> (which can only recommend), the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofTransportation/">Department of Transportation</a> has granted the airline immunity from antitrust laws. This clears the way for Continental to work with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">United Airlines</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ual-corporation/uaua/nas" target="_blank">UAUA</a>) -- and other carriers -- on international routes. Now, the airline can join <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/StarAlliance/">Star Alliance</a>, which already has antitrust immunity. </p>
<p>At the same time, DOT approved a joint venture among Continental, United, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-lufthansa-s-adr/dlaky/nao" target="_blank">Lufthansa</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deutsche-lufthansa-s-adr/dlaky/nao" target="_blank">DLAKY</a>) and Air Canada. This new relationship would involve trans-Atlantic routes.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>DOT overrides Justice, Continental Airlines wins antitrust relief</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/">DOT overrides Justice, Continental Airlines wins antitrust relief</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-07-10-continental-ati-ok_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19095353/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/13/dot-overrides-justice-continental-airlines-wins-antitrust-relie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>american air travel</category><category>american airline</category><category>american airlines</category><category>AmericanAirline</category><category>AmericanAirlines</category><category>AmericanAirTravel</category><category>amr</category><category>amr corp.</category><category>amrcorp</category><category>AmrCorp.</category><category>continental</category><category>continental airlines</category><category>ContinentalAirlines</category><category>dal</category><category>delta</category><category>delta air lines</category><category>deltaairlines</category><category>department of justice</category><category>department of transportation</category><category>DepartmentOfJustice</category><category>DepartmentOfTransportation</category><category>doj</category><category>dot</category><category>inthenews</category><category>skyteam</category><category>star alliance</category><category>StarAlliance</category><category>ual</category><category>ual corp.</category><category>ual corporation</category><category>ualcorp</category><category>UalCorp.</category><category>UalCorporation</category><category>uaua</category><category>united</category><category>united airlines</category><category>UnitedAirlines</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Online travel to become cheaper in market share play]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/expe/" rel="tag">Expedia Inc (EXPE)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/priceline.jpg" />Desperate times <strike>call for desperate measures</strike> benefit consumers. As online travel agencies slug it out in the hunt for market share, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE5504E120090601" target="_blank">many are starting to cut booking fees</a> -- ironically, in stark contrast to <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/05/14/misery-works-airlines-making-money-on-baggage-fees/" target="_blank">what the airlines themselves are doing</a>. While the airlines are looking to squeeze every last ounce of revenue from each passenger mile, the websites that put people in seats are hungry for any competitive advantage they can find. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/orbitz-worldwide-inc/oww/nys" target="_blank">Orbitz Worldwide</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/orbitz-worldwide-inc/oww/nys" target="_blank">OWW</a>) has permanently kicked its airline booking fees on both domestic and international flights. Travelocity is following suit, to a limited extent, at least, by continuing to wave booking fees ... a measure that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expedia-inc-del/expe/nas" target="_blank">Expedia Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/expedia-inc-del/expe/nas" target="_blank">EXPE</a>) is taking, as well. What started as promotions are fast becoming the norm.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Online travel to become cheaper in market share play</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/">Online travel to become cheaper in market share play</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE5504E120090601>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19054320/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/02/online-travel-to-become-cheaper-in-market-share-play/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>expedia</category><category>expedia.com</category><category>featured</category><category>orbitz</category><category>orbitz worldwide</category><category>orbitz.com</category><category>priceline</category><category>priceline.com</category><category>travel site</category><category>travel sites</category><category>travel web sites</category><category>travel website</category><category>travelocity</category><category>travelocity.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. travel exports to rebound in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/u-s-travel-exports-to-rebound-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/u-s-travel-exports-to-rebound-in-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/u-s-travel-exports-to-rebound-in-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/deltalobby.jpg" alt="" />How can exports not rebound? Last year ended on a sour note after posting record results, and 2009 is by all accounts likely to be ugly. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/tourismandtravel/">tourism and travel</a> industry is expected to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/02/27/travel-to-lose-200-000-jobs/">shed more than 200,000 jobs this year</a>. Fortunately, there's a light at the end of the tunnel. The U.S. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DepartmentofCommerce/">Department of Commerce</a> expects international visits to the United States to come back in 2010 - after its first forecasted year of decline (i.e., 2009) since 2003. </p>
<p>This year, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/internationaltravel/">international travel</a> to the United States is expected to fall 8%. The following year, however, U.S. travel exports are expected to gain 5%, with 5% annual increases through the end of 2013. We'll come out ahead in all this, but it's going to take some time. </p>
<p>Will the influx of foreign visitors over the next four years be enough to turn the travel industry in the United States around? It's too soon to tell right now, and much will depend on the contributions made by domestic routes. Needless to say, even this glimmer of hope must be welcome to investors committed to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airline/">airline</a> and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/hotel/">hotel</a> sectors. <br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/u-s-travel-exports-to-rebound-in-2010/">U.S. travel exports to rebound in 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 May 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://tinet.ita.doc.gov/outreachpages/inbound.general_information.inbound_overview.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/u-s-travel-exports-to-rebound-in-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19048595/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/u-s-travel-exports-to-rebound-in-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>department of transportation</category><category>DepartmentOfTransportation</category><category>export</category><category>exports</category><category>hotel</category><category>hotels</category><category>international travel</category><category>internationaltravel</category><category>inthenews</category><category>tourism</category><category>tourism and travel</category><category>tourism industry</category><category>TourismAndTravel</category><category>TourismIndustry</category><category>travel</category><category>travel industry</category><category>travel stocks</category><category>TravelIndustry</category><category>TravelStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[British Airways: worst loss in 20+ years]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/british-airways-worst-loss-in-20-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/british-airways-worst-loss-in-20-years/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/british-airways-worst-loss-in-20-years/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/british-airways-plc/bay/ise"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/british-airways.jpg" alt="" />British Airways</a> (LSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/british-airways-plc/bay/ise">BA</a>) lost ₤375 million ($595 million) <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-05-22-ba-loss-ap_N.htm">in the 12 months ending March 31, 2009</a>. This is down from a profit of ₤712 million ($1.1 billion) the year before. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airline/">airline</a>, which was privatized in 1987, has never sustained a loss this great. As a result, British Airways will not pay any dividends to shareholders -- or bonuses to the management team. </p>
<p>Weaker demand and spikes in fuel costs are cited as the reasons for the year-over-year record loss. Revenue was up 2.9% (₤8.99 billion) year-over-year, but this was not enough to offset a 45% increase in fuel costs -- to ₤2.97 billion. Demand problems struck in the fourth quarter, with revenue dropping 8.4% to ₤1.9 billion.</p>
<p>Its previous record loss was ₤200 million for the year ending in 2002. <br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/british-airways-worst-loss-in-20-years/">British Airways: worst loss in 20+ years</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 May 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2009-05-22-ba-loss-ap_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/british-airways-worst-loss-in-20-years/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1555601/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/british-airways-worst-loss-in-20-years/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>AirlineIndustry</category><category>airlines</category><category>AirlineSector</category><category>british airways</category><category>BritishAirways</category><category>london stock excghange</category><category>london stock exchange</category><category>london stocks</category><category>LondonStockExcghange</category><category>LondonStockExchange</category><category>LondonStocks</category><category>lse</category><category>record losses</category><category>RecordLosses</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ryanair annoyance fees could be top-line advantage]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/ryanair.jpg" />Passenger annoyance has been on the rise over the past year, as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/airlines/">airlines</a> have found new and unusual fees to charge passengers. European low-cost carrier <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ryanair-holdings-plc-american-depositary-shares/ryaay/nas" target="_blank">Ryanair</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ryanair-holdings-plc-american-depositary-shares/ryaay/nas" target="_blank">RYAAY</a>) has been at the tip of the spear, at one point considering a <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/02/28/ryanair-to-pay-to-pee-or-not-to-pay-to-pee/" target="_blank">charge for access to the lavatory</a>. The hidden secret in all this is that it works.</p>
<p>Ryanair's latest fee is nothing short of brilliant. The airline is now slapping customers with <a href="http://www.gadling.com/2009/05/19/ryanair-print-your-tickets-at-home-or-not-you-pay/" target="_blank">a &euro;10 ($14) charge for printing boarding passes at home</a> ... and &euro;40 ($55) to do so at the airport. Since there's no other way to get your boarding pass, this translates to a minimum fee of $14 per flight (with a few small exceptions). Given the company's price advantage in the short-haul European space, the move is unlikely to drive passengers to competitors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ryanair annoyance fees could be top-line advantage</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/">Ryanair annoyance fees could be top-line advantage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 May 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.gadling.com/2009/05/19/ryanair-print-your-tickets-at-home-or-not-you-pay/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1555199/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/25/ryanair-annoyance-fees-could-be-top-line-advantage/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>airline fees</category><category>airline industry</category><category>airline sector</category><category>airlines</category><category>low cost</category><category>low cost carrier</category><category>low cost carriers</category><category>ryanair</category><category>ryanair stealth charges</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
