<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Airline Alliance Set to Clear Antitrust Hurdle]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/earnsamr240.jpg" alt="" />An new international alliance of airlines has gained tentative approval from the U.S. Department of Transportation. The alliance, dubbed "Oneworld Airline," would include partners British Airways (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/british-airways-plc-s-adr/bairy/nao">BAIRY</a>), Iberia Airlines, Finnair, Royal Jordanian Airlines and American Airlines (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/amr-corporation/amr/nys">AMR</a>).</p>
<p>Final approval by remains contingent upon certain conditions, including the requirement that the alliance relinquish a percentage of its highly valued takeoff and landing slots at London's Heathrow Airport. Members of the alliance have also offered the possibility of sharing transatlantic routes with competitors in an effort to quell fears of unfair competition which are being expressed from within the European Union.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Airline Alliance Set to Clear Antitrust Hurdle</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/">Airline Alliance Set to Clear Antitrust Hurdle</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19357952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/15/airline-alliance-set-to-clear-antitrust-hurdle/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>airline</category><category>alliance</category><category>American Airlines</category><category>AMR</category><category>BAIRY</category><category>Department of Transportation</category><category>DOT</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John Hughes</category><category>oneworld</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will Apple be seeing Palm in court?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rimm/" rel="tag">Research in Motion (RIMM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/gavel.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />While <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">Research In Motion</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) are locked in <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2009/01/new-blackberry-not-taking-anything-by-storm.html">their battle</a> for smartphone supremacy, a new entry into the market has grabbed headlines.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">Palm</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">PALM</a>) brand new touch-screen smartphone -- the Pre -- was the surprise event at this year's Consumer Electronics Show (CES). Among other things, the Pre uses the Palm's Web OS, which supposedly can consolidate data from multiple Web sources.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will Apple be seeing Palm in court?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/">Will Apple be seeing Palm in court?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:59:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1445094/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/30/will-apple-be-seeing-palm-in-court/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>changewave alliance</category><category>changewave alliance research network</category><category>changewave research</category><category>ChangewaveAlliance</category><category>ChangewaveAllianceResearchNetwork</category><category>ChangewaveResearch</category><category>palm pre</category><category>palm web os</category><category>palm webos</category><category>PalmPre</category><category>PalmWebos</category><category>paul carton</category><category>PaulCarton</category><category>pre</category><category>smartphone</category><category>smartphones</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Carton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Seven reasons the market is not going up any time soon: #6 IT spending is flat and falling]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/seven-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-6-it-sp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/seven-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-6-it-sp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/seven-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-6-it-sp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/computers.gif" />The canary in the coal mine for the economy is business capital spending.</p>
<p>IT spending? What IT spending? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2008/12/business-pc-purchasing-limps-toward-new-year.html">According to</a> ChangeWave Research surveys, spending is flat or falling. </p>
<p>There are no gee-whiz products to buy and install, the number of employees is shrinking, meaning there are lots of extra computers and spare server capacity lying about. The number of licensees for a software license is shrinking and so on. </p>
<p>What's worse, IT spending is contracting even faster overseas, and these markets account for more than 50% of the revenue for most big U.S. tech outfits. </p>
<p><em>Be sure to read <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/your-stock-market-nightmare-isnt-over-7-reasons-the-market-is/">all 7 reasons </a> the stock market isn't going up any time soon.</em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.optionszone.com/expert-traders/optionszone-experts/michael-shulman.html">Michael Shulman</a> is a contributor to <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2008/11/how-to-bet-on-tech-without-losing-your-shirt.html">OptionsZone.com</a>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/seven-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-6-it-sp/">Seven reasons the market is not going up any time soon: #6 IT spending is flat and falling</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/seven-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-6-it-sp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1437981/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/24/seven-reasons-the-market-is-not-going-up-any-time-soon-6-it-sp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>alliance data systems</category><category>AllianceDataSystems</category><category>capital spending</category><category>CapitalSpending</category><category>changewave alliance</category><category>changewave alliance research network</category><category>ChangewaveAlliance</category><category>ChangewaveAllianceResearchNetwork</category><category>IT spending</category><category>ItSpending</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>MichaelShulman</category><category>stock market nightmare</category><category>StockMarketNightmare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Which cell phone carrier has the fewest dropped calls?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/s/" rel="tag">Sprint Nextel Corp (S)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/cell-phone-angry.jpg" />Dropped calls have been a nuisance since the dawn of cell phones. But which cellular service provider has the best record in terms of the fewest dropped calls?</p>
<p>In a recent survey, ChangeWave asked 3,800 cell phone owners to estimate the percentage of their calls that were dropped during the past 90 days. </p>
<p>The survey, which was conducted Dec. 9-15, 2008, produced a clear winner: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) has the fewest dropped calls of all.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Which cell phone carrier has the fewest dropped calls?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/">Which cell phone carrier has the fewest dropped calls?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1429812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/which-cell-phone-carrier-has-the-fewest-dropped-calls/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>alliance data systems</category><category>AllianceDataSystems</category><category>cell phone</category><category>cell phones</category><category>CellPhone</category><category>CellPhones</category><category>cellular phones</category><category>cellular service</category><category>cellular service providers</category><category>CellularPhones</category><category>CellularService</category><category>CellularServiceProviders</category><category>changewave alliance</category><category>changewave alliance research network</category><category>changewave research</category><category>ChangewaveAlliance</category><category>ChangewaveAllianceResearchNetwork</category><category>ChangewaveResearch</category><category>dropped calls</category><category>DroppedCalls</category><category>featured</category><category>fewest dropped calls</category><category>FewestDroppedCalls</category><category>paul carton</category><category>PaulCarton</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Carton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Somebody actually likes their broker!?!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/somebody-actually-likes-their-broker/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/somebody-actually-likes-their-broker/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/somebody-actually-likes-their-broker/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/schw/" rel="tag">Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amtd/" rel="tag">TD AmeriTrade Holding (AMTD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/etfc/" rel="tag">E*TRADE (ETFC)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/computer-head-sm.jpg" />After the <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/markets-gone-wild.html">stock market meltdown of 2008</a>, Wall Street brokerages aren't anyone's favorites in <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/gallery/other-galleries-to-read.html">2009</a>. </p>
<p>But some customers said they're still happy with their online broker.</p>
<p>A December ChangeWave survey of 3,051 <a href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/2008/12/worst-consumer-spending-outlook-on-record.html">consumers</a> found that despite the extremely difficult financial market, two online brokerages still capture high customer satisfaction ratings -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/charles-schwab-corporation-the/schw/nas">Charles Schwab</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/charles-schwab-corporation-the/schw/nas">SCHW</a>) and archrival, Scottrade.</p>
<p align="center"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/brokerage-satisfaction.gif" /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/somebody-actually-likes-their-broker/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Somebody actually likes their broker!?!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/somebody-actually-likes-their-broker/">Somebody actually likes their broker!?!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/somebody-actually-likes-their-broker/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1419326/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/somebody-actually-likes-their-broker/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>alliance data systems</category><category>AllianceDataSystems</category><category>amtd</category><category>broker</category><category>brokerage</category><category>brokerage firms</category><category>BrokerageFirms</category><category>brokerages</category><category>brokers</category><category>changewave alliance</category><category>changewave alliance research network</category><category>changewave investing</category><category>ChangewaveAlliance</category><category>ChangewaveAllianceResearchNetwork</category><category>ChangewaveInvesting</category><category>etfc</category><category>fidelity</category><category>ing</category><category>inthenews</category><category>online broker</category><category>online brokerages</category><category>online brokers</category><category>OnlineBroker</category><category>OnlineBrokerages</category><category>OnlineBrokers</category><category>paul carton</category><category>PaulCarton</category><category>schw</category><category>scottrade</category><category>t. rowe price</category><category>T.RowePrice</category><category>trow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Carton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would you like fries with your coffee? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/would-you-like-fries-with-your-coffee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/would-you-like-fries-with-your-coffee/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/would-you-like-fries-with-your-coffee/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/french-fries.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Java junkies are shunning <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) in favor of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">McDonald's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>) coffee, according to a new ChangeWave survey of more than 1,300 consumers. </p>
<p>The survey results show a massive shift away from specialty retailers toward <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/is-starbucks-committing-suicide/">less expensive alternatives</a> like McDonald's and home brewing.</p>
<p>Just 4% of respondents said they'll be purchasing coffee more often at Starbucks during the next 90 days, while a huge 26% said less often (net score = -22).</p>
<p>Though 11% of respondents said they'll buy more coffee at McDonald's, only 4% said less (net score = +7).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/would-you-like-fries-with-your-coffee/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would you like fries with your coffee? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/would-you-like-fries-with-your-coffee/">Would you like fries with your coffee? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/would-you-like-fries-with-your-coffee/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1407222/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/would-you-like-fries-with-your-coffee/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>ChangeWave Alliance Research Network</category><category>coffee</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonalds</category><category>paul carton</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Carton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst downgrades: AN, CFC, DRI and RARE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/analyst-downgrades-an-cfc-dri-and-rare/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/analyst-downgrades-an-cfc-dri-and-rare/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/analyst-downgrades-an-cfc-dri-and-rare/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/an/" rel="tag">AutoNation Inc (AN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dri/" rel="tag">Darden Restaurants (DRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/aol-fly-logo.gif" /></a>MOST NOTEWORTHY: </strong>AutoNation (AN), Darden Restaurants (DRI), Rare Hospitality (RARE) and ChoicePoint (CPS) were today's noteworthy downgrades: <br />
<ul>
    <li>Goldman cut <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/autonation-inc/an/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AutoNation </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/autonation-inc/an/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AN</a>) to Sell from Neutral based on potential for additional earnings shortfalls. The firm does not expect a sharp rebound in shares. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Bear Stearns downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/darden-restaurants-inc/dri/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Darden Restaurants</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/darden-restaurants-inc/dri/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DRI</a>) to Peer Perform from Outperform following its acquisition of Rare Hospitality. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rare-hospitality-international-inc/rare/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Rare Hospitality </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rare-hospitality-international-inc/rare/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">RARE</a>) was cut to Hold from Buy at Keybanc following the acquisition offer from Darden. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/choicepoint-inc/cps/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">ChoicePoint</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/choicepoint-inc/cps/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CPS</a>) was cut to Reduce from Neutral at Suntrust, citing the difficult macro environment, which will impact revenue growth in its low-barrier commoditized non-insurance operations... </li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER DOWNGRADES</strong>: <br />
<ul>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/choicepoint-inc/cps/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Alliance Holdings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/choicepoint-inc/cps/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AHGP</a>) was cut to Hold from Buy at AG Edwards. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>UBS downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sl-green-realty-corp/slg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">SL Green Realty </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sl-green-realty-corp/slg/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">SLG</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/boston-properties-inc/bxp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Boston Properties</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/boston-properties-inc/bxp/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BXP</a>) to Neutral from Buy. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
    <li>Morgan Stanley downgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Countrywide Financial </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CFC</a>) to Equal Weight from Overweight. </li>
</ul>
<em>Analyst summaries provided by <a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL">TheFlyOnTheWall.com </a>(subscription required).<br /></em><strong><br /></strong><a target="_blank" title="View Buy on fear today? Bear Stearns (BSC), Countrywide (CFC), IndyMac (IMB), Popular (BPOP), Washington Mutual (WM) on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/10/buy-on-fear-today-bear-stearns-countrywide-indymac-popular/" /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/analyst-downgrades-an-cfc-dri-and-rare/">Analyst downgrades: AN, CFC, DRI and RARE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/analyst-downgrades-an-cfc-dri-and-rare/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/967762/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/17/analyst-downgrades-an-cfc-dri-and-rare/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ahgp</category><category>alliance</category><category>an</category><category>autonation</category><category>boston properties</category><category>BostonProperties</category><category>bxp</category><category>choicepoint</category><category>cps</category><category>darden</category><category>dri</category><category>green reality</category><category>GreenReality</category><category>rare</category><category>rare hospitality</category><category>RareHospitality</category><category>slg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Taser and iRobot form alliance -- T-1000 looming?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/taser-and-irobot-form-alliance-t-1000-looming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/taser-and-irobot-form-alliance-t-1000-looming/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/taser-and-irobot-form-alliance-t-1000-looming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tasr/" rel="tag">Taser Intl Inc (TASR)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/fly-logo-(aol).gif" /></a>In what may be the coolest bit of news to hit the wires all week, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/taser-international-inc/tasr/nas">Taser International Inc</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/taser-international-inc/tasr/nas">TASR</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/irobot-corporation/irbt/nas">iRobot Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/irobot-corporation/irbt/nas">IRBT</a>) have announced their intentions to <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-06-28T115926Z_01_WNAS4888_RTRIDST_0_TASER-AGREEMENT-IROBOT-URGENT.XML">form an alliance</a> to create an army of T-1000 robots. Okay, not exactly. The actual announcement read:<br /><br />"Under the terms of this alliance the two companies will work collaboratively to develop a new robotic capability utilizing TASER technologies. This combination of capabilities will allow law enforcement, federal, and military users to employ TASER technology from an iRobot platform at a safe distance to engage, incapacitate, and control dangerous suspects without exposing those personnel, the suspect, or bystanders to unnecessary risks, the companies said.<br /><br />As the first step in this alliance, the two companies have integrated TASER X26 electronic control device technology into the iRobot PackBot Explorer."<br /><br />This is still exciting news for both Taser and iRobot. It signals that both companies are aware of the limited markets for their niche products -- the Taser stun gun and the Roomba -- and are actively seeking to broaden their scope. How successful will this alliance be? Only after we see a prototype of the iRobot PackBot Explorer with Taser x26 electronic control device technology will we know for sure. But hopefully not as successful as the T-1000.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/taser-and-irobot-form-alliance-t-1000-looming/">Taser and iRobot form alliance -- T-1000 looming?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/taser-and-irobot-form-alliance-t-1000-looming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/928693/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/taser-and-irobot-form-alliance-t-1000-looming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>irbt</category><category>irobot</category><category>roomba</category><category>t-1000</category><category>taser</category><category>tasr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IBM, Lehman Brothers and Kingdee: Hey Microsoft are you listening?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ibm-lehman-brothers-and-kingdee-hey-microsoft-are-you-listenin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ibm-lehman-brothers-and-kingdee-hey-microsoft-are-you-listenin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ibm-lehman-brothers-and-kingdee-hey-microsoft-are-you-listenin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/leh/" rel="tag">Lehman Br Holdings (LEH)</a></p><p>China Tech News has reported that <a href="http://www.chinatechnews.com/2007/06/05/5474-ibm-lehman-brothers-put-money-into-kingdee/#more-5474">IBM and Lehman Brothers are working in financial and technical alliance</a> to help bring Chinese software provider Kingdee into fully global status. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) has been associated with Kingdee for approximately ten years already, and an offshore business alliance between IBM and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lehman Brothers</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/leh/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LEH</a>) is focusing on helping mid-stage and maturing Chinese businesses expand their business and management capabilities. IBM helps with the operational and technical aspects while Lehman Brothers will be assisting with investment strategies and private equity direction. This cooperative financial support is being provided through what has been labeled the "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=China%20Investment%20Fund">China Investment Fund</a>." What makes this particular scenario a bit more interesting is that Lehman Brothers and IBM are each purchasing just under 4% of the issued share capital interest in Kingdee.</p>
<p>For now the declared intent of this joint project is primarily to facilitate the growth of Kingdee, but the long-term language suggests that IBM is helping to nurture the Chinese software industry as a whole. I can't help but wonder what the implications might be for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) as the Chinese software industry continues to push into global markets with background support from IBM. At this point in time I can only draw one undeniable conclusion: This is definitely <em>not</em> something to be taken lightly.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ibm-lehman-brothers-and-kingdee-hey-microsoft-are-you-listenin/">IBM, Lehman Brothers and Kingdee: Hey Microsoft are you listening?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ibm-lehman-brothers-and-kingdee-hey-microsoft-are-you-listenin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/910768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/08/ibm-lehman-brothers-and-kingdee-hey-microsoft-are-you-listenin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>China</category><category>China Investment Fund</category><category>ChinaInvestmentFund</category><category>global</category><category>IBM</category><category>joint venture</category><category>JointVenture</category><category>Kingdee</category><category>Lehman Brothers</category><category>LehmanBrothers</category><category>marketing</category><category>software</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Countrywide courted by Bank of America?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/countrywide-courted-by-bank-of-america/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/countrywide-courted-by-bank-of-america/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/countrywide-courted-by-bank-of-america/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/countrywide.bmp" />Since August, the stock price of Countrywide (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/countrywide-financial-corporation/cfc/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CFC</a>) has had a decent rally. And, it looks like part of it has been from rumors of a takeover.</p>
<p>Well, according to a <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/070126/countrywide_bankofamerica.html?.v=3">report</a> from the Financial Times, there may actually be some credence to this scenario. The suitor? Bank of America (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/bank-of-america-corporation/bac/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">BAC</a>).</p>
<p>However, the first step may be an alliance. But, why not just ultimately make it a merger?</p>
<p>Actually, investors are taking things seriously. On the news, Countrywide's stock price increased 4.24% to $42. </p>
<p>Already, Bank of America is #1 in deposits and #1 in credit cards. Hey, why not #1 in mortgages?</p>
<p>Besides, after last year's deal for MBNA, Bank of America is probably ready for another mega deal.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/countrywide-courted-by-bank-of-america/">Countrywide courted by Bank of America?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/countrywide-courted-by-bank-of-america/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/743381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/26/countrywide-courted-by-bank-of-america/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>bac</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>bofa</category><category>Buyout</category><category>cfc</category><category>countrywide</category><category>deals</category><category>mega merger</category><category>megadeal</category><category>MegaMerger</category><category>merger</category><category>mergers</category><category>Mortgages</category><category>rumor</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ballmer plays down Microsoft &amp; eBay vs. Google rumor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/ballmer-plays-down-microsoft-and-ebay-vs-google-rumor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/ballmer-plays-down-microsoft-and-ebay-vs-google-rumor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/ballmer-plays-down-microsoft-and-ebay-vs-google-rumor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p>Following on last week's&nbsp;<em>Wall Street Journal</em>&nbsp;article&nbsp;(see my previous <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/">commentary</a>),exploring a potential alliance between eBay and either Microsoft or Yahoo, <ahref="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060428113609990006">Microsoft's CEO Steve Ballmer in aninterview</a> with German newspaper <em>Die Welt</em> dismissed explicit plans for an eBay and Microsoft alliance tocombat Google.</p>
<p>He notes that he and eBay CEO Meg Whitman have known each other for 22 years and do communicateoften regarding&nbsp;their respective businesses and what&nbsp;synergies the two companies could attain together.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Of course, Ballmer makes no&nbsp;explicit reference on&nbsp;how Microsoft plans to deal withincreasing&nbsp;competition from Google, but the field will no doubt become more interesting as the <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/yahoo-and-msns-strategic-response-to-googles-dominance/">battle oversearch-advertising</a> rages on.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/ballmer-plays-down-microsoft-and-ebay-vs-google-rumor/">Ballmer plays down Microsoft &amp; eBay vs. Google rumor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060428113609990006>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/ballmer-plays-down-microsoft-and-ebay-vs-google-rumor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/612922/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/ballmer-plays-down-microsoft-and-ebay-vs-google-rumor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>ebay</category><category>google</category><category>microsoft</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Tsung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay looks to team with MSFT or YHOO to combat Google]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p>Today's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> reports that eBay is in talks with Microsoft and Yahoo! to potentially form astrategic alliance against Google.</p>
<p>The net industry is really showing how truly volatile and liquid it is.&nbsp;Where Yahoo! used to reign supreme in search and eBay in auctions,&nbsp;just this week both companies are reportingnumbers that are lackluster, to say the least.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Once upon a time, two years ago, Yahoo! and eBay wereheralded in academic classrooms and Wall Street boardrooms as the new leaders in their respective sectors. Theircompetitors (Alta Vista, Excite, MSN, Amazon, Pricewatch, Yahoo! Auctions, etc.) were all in distant second and thirdplaces; Yahoo! and eBay seemed destined to be de facto internet titans.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Out of left field though, Googlehas come blazing onto the scene and the buzz won't seem to stop.&nbsp; In less than two years, Google has surpassed anyanalyst's wildest dreams and reached a market cap of $130 billion. Compare that to Yahoo!'s market cap of $46 billionand eBay's market cap of $49.37 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>eBay looks to team with MSFT or YHOO to combat Google</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/">eBay looks to team with MSFT or YHOO to combat Google</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/060421/ebay_yahoo_microsoft.html?.v=3>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/610733/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/21/ebay-looks-to-team-with-msft-or-yhoo-to-combat-google/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alliance</category><category>eBay</category><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard Tsung]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
