<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Can Mosaic Co. Tackle Resistance After Q1 Earnings?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/mosaic-q1-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/mosaic-q1-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/mosaic-q1-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/mosaic-logo-240.jpg" alt="Mosaic logo" />The Mosaic Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-mosaic-company/mos/nys" class="inlinked">MOS</a>) is slated to take its turn on the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/" class="inlinked">earnings</a> stage after Monday's closing bell, with the agricultural chemical concern set to unveil its fiscal first-quarter results.</p>
<p>Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters are anticipating a profit of 72 cents per share, substantially higher than the company's year-ago earnings of 23 cents per share. Mosaic has a dismal history in the earnings spotlight, having fallen short of Wall Street's consensus profit expectations in three of the past four quarters.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/mosaic-q1-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Mosaic Co. Tackle Resistance After Q1 Earnings?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/mosaic-q1-earnings-preview/">Can Mosaic Co. Tackle Resistance After Q1 Earnings?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/mosaic-q1-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19659527/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/04/mosaic-q1-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analyst forecasts</category><category>analysts</category><category>calls</category><category>downgrades</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>featured</category><category>first quarter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MOS</category><category>Mosaic</category><category>Mosaic earnings</category><category>options</category><category>price target</category><category>profit</category><category>revenue</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>The Mosaic Company</category><category>upgrades</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times Offers Bleak Q3 Guidance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="New York Times (NYT)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/nytimes.jpg" />The Old Grey Lady is ailing. Wednesday morning, New York Times Co. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) warned that its <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100922-707249.html">third-quarter revenue will decline</a> by a wider-than-expected margin, due to slower growth in digital advertising. Speaking at an investor conference in New York, CEO Janet Robinson explained that digital ad revenue is expected to rise about 14%, compared to its earlier forecast for growth in the mid-to-high teens.<br />
<br />
As a result, the company expects to swallow a third-quarter operating loss of 5 cents to 7 cents per share. Excluding items, <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/">earnings</a> are expected to arrive at 3 cents to 5 cents per share, compared to Wall Street's <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Consensus Estimate">consensus estimate</a> of 4 cents per share.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times Offers Bleak Q3 Guidance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/">New York Times Offers Bleak Q3 Guidance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19643982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/22/new-york-times-q3-guidance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>digital advertising</category><category>earnings</category><category>forecast</category><category>guidance</category><category>inthenews</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NYT</category><category>NYT guidance</category><category>options</category><category>puts</category><category>revenue</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>third quarter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings Preview: Can AutoZone Rev Higher After Q4 Report?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/autozone-earnings-preview/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/autozone-earnings-preview/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/autozone-earnings-preview/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/azo/" rel="tag">AutoZone Inc (AZO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="AutoZone (AZO) logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/azo-logo.jpg" />AutoZone Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/autozone-inc/azo/nys">AZO</a>) is scheduled to release its fiscal fourth-quarter <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/">earnings</a> before the market opens Tuesday, Sept. 21. The retailer has a solid track record in the earnings spotlight, having exceeded analysts' per-share profit predictions in each of the past four reporting periods -- and AZO has managed to surpass Wall Street's <a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/glossary/Consensus Estimate">consensus estimate</a> by an increasingly wide margin in each sequential quarter.</p>
<p>Ahead of the report, analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters are anticipating AutoZone to bank a profit of $5.42 per share, up from $4.45 per share in the year-ago period. Sales are expected to arrive at $2.39 billion.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/autozone-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings Preview: Can AutoZone Rev Higher After Q4 Report?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/autozone-earnings-preview/">Earnings Preview: Can AutoZone Rev Higher After Q4 Report?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/autozone-earnings-preview/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19640387/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/20/autozone-earnings-preview/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>annual high</category><category>AutoZone</category><category>AZO</category><category>downgrade</category><category>earnings</category><category>featured</category><category>fourth quarter</category><category>price target</category><category>profit</category><category>revenue</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What's in Store for SunPower After Earnings?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/whats-in-store-for-sunpower-after-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/whats-in-store-for-sunpower-after-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/whats-in-store-for-sunpower-after-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/sunpower-logo.jpg" alt="" />After the closing bell, SunPower Corporation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sunpower-corporation/spwra/nas">SPWRA</a>) will take the spotlight to reveal its fourth-quarter earnings. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters are expecting the solar concern to report net income of 49 cents per share, down from its year-ago profit of 70 cents per share. Sales for the period are expected to arrive at $491 million.</p>
<p>SunPower has a solid history in the earnings spotlight, having exceeded Wall Street's consensus expectations in three of the past four reporting periods. Judging by a recent uptick in call buying, some traders appear to be anticipating another upside surprise.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/whats-in-store-for-sunpower-after-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What's in Store for SunPower After Earnings?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/whats-in-store-for-sunpower-after-earnings/">What's in Store for SunPower After Earnings?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/whats-in-store-for-sunpower-after-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19404985/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/18/whats-in-store-for-sunpower-after-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>earnings</category><category>fourth quarter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>investor sentiment</category><category>options</category><category>short sellers</category><category>SPWRA</category><category>SunPower</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[CME Group Slapped with Post-Earnings Price Target Cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/cme-group-slapped-with-post-earnings-price-target-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/cme-group-slapped-with-post-earnings-price-target-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/cme-group-slapped-with-post-earnings-price-target-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/cme-group-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" /> CME Group (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/cme-group-inc/cme/nas">CME</a>) fell short of analysts' <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-04/cme-group-net-income-triples-profit-misses-estimates-update1-.html">fourth-quarter profit expectations</a> on Thursday, with the firm reporting earnings of $3.37 per share, compared to consensus expectations for a profit of $3.43 per share. This morning, two brokerage firms expressed their post-earnings skepticism by handing out price-target cuts.
<p> </p>
<p>Specifically, KBW lowered its forecast from $360 to $350, while Susquehanna chopped its price target from $370 to $345. Shares of CME finished Thursday at $269.29, so both brokerage firms are still anticipating some healthy gains from the stock during the next year. In fact, both targets exceed the equity's average 12-month price target of $342.35, as reported by Thomson Reuters, which implies expected upside of more than 27% from yesterday's close.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/cme-group-slapped-with-post-earnings-price-target-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CME Group Slapped with Post-Earnings Price Target Cuts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/cme-group-slapped-with-post-earnings-price-target-cuts/">CME Group Slapped with Post-Earnings Price Target Cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/cme-group-slapped-with-post-earnings-price-target-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19346481/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/cme-group-slapped-with-post-earnings-price-target-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>CME</category><category>CME Group</category><category>earnings</category><category>fourth quarter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>price targets</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Better reporting standards could hike insurance stock prices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/27/better-reporting-standards-could-hike-insurance-stock-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/27/better-reporting-standards-could-hike-insurance-stock-prices/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/27/better-reporting-standards-could-hike-insurance-stock-prices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/logo_pwc_200.jpg" />The worldwide insurance industry may be worth more than you think. Industry analysts believe that reporting isn't as consistent as it could be, and that <a href="http://www.postonline.co.uk/post/news/1563247/pwc-insurers-valued-inconsistent-financial-reporting" target="_blank">improvements to insurance financial reporting</a> would pump up those stock prices.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pwc.com" target="_blank">PricewaterhouseCoopers</a> interviewed more than 40 investment professionals from the U.S., Asia and Europe, finding that dissatisfaction with insurance financial reporting was widespread. They'd like to see the <a href="http://www.iasb.org/" target="_blank">International Accounting Standards Board</a> and <a href="http://www.fasb.org/" target="_blank">Financial Accounting Standards Board</a> build a better mousetrap for the industry.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/27/better-reporting-standards-could-hike-insurance-stock-prices/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Better reporting standards could hike insurance stock prices</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/27/better-reporting-standards-could-hike-insurance-stock-prices/">Better reporting standards could hike insurance stock prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/27/better-reporting-standards-could-hike-insurance-stock-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19255401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/27/better-reporting-standards-could-hike-insurance-stock-prices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accounting standards</category><category>analysts</category><category>FASB</category><category>Financial Accounting Standards Board</category><category>financial reporting</category><category>financial reports</category><category>IFRS</category><category>insurance</category><category>International Financial Reporting Standards</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PricewaterhouseCoopers</category><category>PWC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Third quarter earnings preview for Tiffany]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/third-quarter-earnings-preview-for-tiffany-tif/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/third-quarter-earnings-preview-for-tiffany-tif/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/third-quarter-earnings-preview-for-tiffany-tif/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tif/" rel="tag">Tiffany and Co (TIF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img width="142" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="202" border="0" align="right" alt="tiffany TIF third quarter earnings preview" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/tiffany.jpg" />Before tomorrow's open, jewelry retailer Tiffany &amp; Co. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tiffany-and-company/tif/nys">TIF</a>) will be reporting its third quarter results. Analysts are expecting to see the company show <a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.aspx?Feed=AP&amp;Date=20091123&amp;ID=10759324&amp;Symbol=TIF">earnings of 23 cents per share</a>.<br /><br />For the same period last year the company had earnings of 35 cents.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/third-quarter-earnings-preview-for-tiffany-tif/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Third quarter earnings preview for Tiffany</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/third-quarter-earnings-preview-for-tiffany-tif/">Third quarter earnings preview for Tiffany</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/third-quarter-earnings-preview-for-tiffany-tif/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19252927/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/24/third-quarter-earnings-preview-for-tiffany-tif/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>David A. Schick</category><category>DavidA.Schick</category><category>discretionaryspending</category><category>earnings</category><category>earnings preview</category><category>EarningsPreview</category><category>jewelry</category><category>retailers</category><category>Stifel Nicolaus</category><category>StifelNicolaus</category><category>TIF</category><category>tiffany</category><category>tiffanyandco</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell: Investors' caution reigns amid earnings season]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bdk/" rel="tag">Black and Decker (BDK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bmy/" rel="tag">Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cb/" rel="tag">Chubb Corp (CB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmg/" rel="tag">Chipotle Mexican Grill'A' (CMG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bg/" rel="tag">Bunge Ltd. (BG)</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-red.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Despite largely positive corporate earnings reports, investor caution has set upon Wall Street. For the third straight day stocks are set to move into negative territory, with futures showing the three major U.S. indexes heading lower ahead of Thursday's opening bell.<br /><br />Some blamed Wednesday's near 1% drops in the Dow Jones industrial average and the S&amp;P 500 on a late-day sell-off driven by the latest <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/10/21/latest-fed-beige-book-survey-shows-the-economy-mending-slowly/">Beige Book survey</a> from the Federal Reserve that showed the economy is ever so slowly emerging from recession -- too slowly, it would seem, for investors.<br /><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the bell: Investors' caution reigns amid earnings season</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/">Before the bell: Investors' caution reigns amid earnings season</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19205229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/before-the-bell-investors-caution-reigns-amid-earnings-season/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>capital one</category><category>CapitalOne</category><category>featured</category><category>investing</category><category>investors</category><category>stock markets</category><category>StockMarkets</category><category>stocks</category><category>wall street</category><category>WallStreet</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schepp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[When to buy the dips in the stock market?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/when-to-buy-the-dips-in-the-stock-market/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/when-to-buy-the-dips-in-the-stock-market/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/when-to-buy-the-dips-in-the-stock-market/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/money-losers-2-american-investor-200cm121808.jpg" />With about a 50% run up since January, the stock market is poised for a dip. That is the conventional wisdom being touted by the analysts.</p>
<p>The idea is a good one, but <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/oct2009/pi2009102_308613.htm">what do you mean by a dip</a>? This is where it experts disagree as usual. Let's take a sampling of some leading pundits:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div>Sam Stovall, chief economist at Standard &amp; Poor's, said: "But now (referring to continued high unemployment) that economic waters appear more choppy and third quarter earnings session is about to begin, are investors less inclined than they were a few weeks back to buy stocks on market dips?"</div>
    </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/when-to-buy-the-dips-in-the-stock-market/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>When to buy the dips in the stock market?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/when-to-buy-the-dips-in-the-stock-market/">When to buy the dips in the stock market?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/when-to-buy-the-dips-in-the-stock-market/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19185065/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/06/when-to-buy-the-dips-in-the-stock-market/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>Bruce McCain</category><category>buying dips</category><category>Cabot Money Management</category><category>KEY</category><category>Key Private Bank</category><category>PNC</category><category>PNC Wealth Management</category><category>Rob Lutts</category><category>Sam Stovall</category><category>stock market</category><category>Stuart Hoffman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earnings preview: Can Discover Financial Services beat again in 3Q?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/earnings-preview-can-discover-financial-services-beat-again-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/earnings-preview-can-discover-financial-services-beat-again-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/earnings-preview-can-discover-financial-services-beat-again-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/discover_logo.gif" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discover-financial-services/dfs/nys">Discover Financial Services</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/discover-financial-services/dfs/nys">DFS</a>) is preparing for its upcoming turn in the earnings spotlight. The firm is scheduled to unveil its fiscal third-quarter results before the market opens Thursday, Sept. 17. </p>
<p>Ahead of the event, analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters are expecting Discover to swallow a loss of about 12 cents per share, down sharply from its year-ago profit of 37 cents per share. Sales for the period are expected to arrive at $743 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/earnings-preview-can-discover-financial-services-beat-again-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Earnings preview: Can Discover Financial Services beat again in 3Q?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/earnings-preview-can-discover-financial-services-beat-again-in/">Earnings preview: Can Discover Financial Services beat again in 3Q?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/earnings-preview-can-discover-financial-services-beat-again-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19163317/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/16/earnings-preview-can-discover-financial-services-beat-again-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>DFS</category><category>Discover Financial Services</category><category>earnings</category><category>implied volatility</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>straddle</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>third-quarter earnings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[FDA raises issues with Genzyme's leukemia drug study]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/fda-raises-issues-with-genzymes-leukemia-drug-study/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/fda-raises-issues-with-genzymes-leukemia-drug-study/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/fda-raises-issues-with-genzymes-leukemia-drug-study/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/genz/" rel="tag">Genzyme (GENZ)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/genz-genzyme-logo.jpg" />The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has some questions for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genzyme-corporation-genzyme-corporation-common-stock/genz/nas">Genzyme Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/genzyme-corporation-genzyme-corporation-common-stock/genz/nas">GENZ</a>) regarding <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssHealthcareNews/idUSN2732710520090828">trial data for its leukemia drug</a>, Clolar. Because Genzyme didn't follow the FDA's recommendations in conducting its main study of Clolar, the regulatory agency is reluctant to make a decision on the basis of the trial results.</p>
<p>In 2007, FDA staff advised Genzyme to conduct a randomized study in which participants receiving Clolar would be compared against a set of patients not receiving the drug. However, the drug company's primary tests did not include a control group; instead, the treatment was tested only on elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/fda-raises-issues-with-genzymes-leukemia-drug-study/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>FDA raises issues with Genzyme's leukemia drug study</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/fda-raises-issues-with-genzymes-leukemia-drug-study/">FDA raises issues with Genzyme's leukemia drug study</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/fda-raises-issues-with-genzymes-leukemia-drug-study/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19143701/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/28/fda-raises-issues-with-genzymes-leukemia-drug-study/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>Clolar</category><category>FDA</category><category>food and drug administration</category><category>GENZ</category><category>Genzyme</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>Zacks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analyst upgrades, downgrades and initiations: ADM, ANN, GENZ, ICE, MON, RIMM ...]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-and-initiations/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-and-initiations/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-and-initiations/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-initiations/" rel="tag">Analyst Initiations</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/08/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></a><strong>Analyst upgrades:</strong><br /></p>
<ul>
    <li>Keefe Bruyette upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intercontinentalexchange-inc/ice/nys">Intercontinental Exchange</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intercontinentalexchange-inc/ice/nys">ICE</a>) to Market Perform from Underperform following the company's in-line quarter and extended buyback. The firm raised its target price on shares to $103 from $98. </li>
    <li>Merriman upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cree-inc/cree/nas">Cree</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cree-inc/cree/nas">CREE</a>) to Buy from Neutral after transitioning coverage of the stock as it believes HB-LED chips are gaining momentum and that the company can top its recently raised guidance. </li>
    <li>Deutsche Bank upgraded <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/p-h-glatfelter-company/glt/nys">Glatfelter</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/p-h-glatfelter-company/glt/nys">GLT</a>) to Buy from Hold following the company's Q2 results due to falling net debt levels and valuation. The firm raised its target on shares to $14 from $8. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-corporate-executive-board-company/exbd/nas">Corporate Executive Board</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-corporate-executive-board-company/exbd/nas">EXBD</a>) was upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at Baird. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cognizant-technology-solutions-corporation/ctsh/nas">Cognizant</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cognizant-technology-solutions-corporation/ctsh/nas">CTSH</a>) was upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Goldman. </li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unit-corporation/unt/nys">Unit Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/unit-corporation/unt/nys">UNT</a>) was upgraded to Buy from Sell at Jesup &amp; Lamont. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-and-initiations/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Analyst upgrades, downgrades and initiations: ADM, ANN, GENZ, ICE, MON, RIMM ...</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-and-initiations/">Analyst upgrades, downgrades and initiations: ADM, ANN, GENZ, ICE, MON, RIMM ...</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-and-initiations/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19120020/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/05/analyst-upgrades-downgrades-and-initiations/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADM</category><category>analysts</category><category>ANN</category><category>ARUN</category><category>CREE</category><category>CTSH</category><category>DM</category><category>downgrades</category><category>EXBD</category><category>GENZ</category><category>GLT</category><category>ICE</category><category>initiations</category><category>IVR</category><category>KIM</category><category>MON</category><category>OMC</category><category>PPL</category><category>RIMM</category><category>SPG</category><category>UNT</category><category>upgrades</category><category>VCLK</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investors cheer the newer, 'leaner' Starbucks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/investors-cheer-the-newer-leaner-starbucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/investors-cheer-the-newer-leaner-starbucks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/investors-cheer-the-newer-leaner-starbucks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/starbucks.jpg" width="160" height="161" />A report today in <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124933474023402611.html?mod=wsjcrmain">The Wall Street Journal</a></em> (subscription required) says that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) is delving into the "lean" manufacturing techniques employed by the likes of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">Toyota Motor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toyota-motor-corporation/tm/nys">TM</a>). Scott Heydon has been named the coffee company's new "vice president of lean thinking," and he's visiting Starbucks joints around the country to help eliminate wasteful movements by the chain's baristas.</p>
<p>Yes, that's right. Under Heydon's aegis, baristas are encouraged to economize their motions to maximize how quickly they can whip up one of the chain's signature drinks. "Motion and work are two different things," he explained to the <em>Journal</em>. "Thirty percent of the partners' time is motion; the walking, reaching, bending." If the process can be streamlined to include less motion, therefore, Starbucks could theoretically churn out more coffee confections in less time, and possibly with fewer workers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/investors-cheer-the-newer-leaner-starbucks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investors cheer the newer, 'leaner' Starbucks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/investors-cheer-the-newer-leaner-starbucks/">Investors cheer the newer, 'leaner' Starbucks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/investors-cheer-the-newer-leaner-starbucks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19118535/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/04/investors-cheer-the-newer-leaner-starbucks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>52-week high</category><category>analysts</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lean</category><category>lean manufacturing</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Scott Heydon</category><category>short sellers</category><category>Starbucks Corporation</category><category>third-quarter earnings</category><category>TM</category><category>Toyota</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Analysts impressed by SunPower Corp. earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/analysts-impressed-by-sunpower-corp-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/analysts-impressed-by-sunpower-corp-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/analysts-impressed-by-sunpower-corp-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/spwr-sunpower-logo.jpg" alt="" />In the wake of its second-quarter earnings report, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sunpower-corporation/spwra/nas">SunPower Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sunpower-corporation/spwra/nas">SPWRA</a>) has garnered no fewer than four price-target increases and at least two upgrades. Running through the list, FBR <a href="http://247wallst.com/2009/07/24/top-10-analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades-schw-hsy-leap-pcs-msft-nflx-pot-pld-rsh-spwra/">upgraded the shares</a> from "market perform" to "outperform," while Collins Stewart upped the equity from "sell" to "hold." FBR also hiked its price target from $22 to $40, while Citigroup upped its target from $15 to $18. Elsewhere, Credit Suisse raised the stock's price target from $20 to $32, and Canaccord Adams increased its 12-month estimate from $21 to $29.</p>
<p>In fact, Wedbush Morgan is the lone bearish holdout this morning, with the brokerage firm bucking the trend by downgrading SPWRA from "outperform" to "neutral."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/analysts-impressed-by-sunpower-corp-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Analysts impressed by SunPower Corp. earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/analysts-impressed-by-sunpower-corp-earnings/">Analysts impressed by SunPower Corp. earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/analysts-impressed-by-sunpower-corp-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19108581/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/24/analysts-impressed-by-sunpower-corp-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>inthenews</category><category>price target</category><category>second-quarter earnings</category><category>short sellers</category><category>short squeeze</category><category>SPWRA</category><category>SunPower Corporation</category><category>technical analysis</category><category>upgrade</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Hudson City Bancorp keep climbing after 2Q earnings?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/can-hudson-city-bancorp-keep-climbing-after-2q-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/can-hudson-city-bancorp-keep-climbing-after-2q-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/can-hudson-city-bancorp-keep-climbing-after-2q-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/hudsoncity_160.gif" />Despite an increase in the number of bad loans, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hudson-city-bancorp-inc/hcbk/nas">Hudson City Bancorp Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hudson-city-bancorp-inc/hcbk/nas">HCBK</a>) managed to exceed analysts' second-quarter earnings estimates. The New Jersey-based bank raked in a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/legacyArticle?duid=mtfh23747_2009-07-21_13-02-22_n21199947_newsml&amp;rpc=33&amp;type=marketsnews">quarterly profit of $127.9 million</a>, or 26 cents per share, up 16% from the year-ago period. The results topped Wall Street's consensus estimate for a profit of 24 cents per share.</p>
<p>However, HCBK's loan-loss provision surged during the quarter to $32.5 million, compared to $20 million during the first quarter. Net charge-offs rose to $9.6 million, more than doubling. Nonperforming loans escalated to $430.9 million (1.40% of total loans), up from $320.1 million (1.06% of total loans) at the end of the first quarter.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/can-hudson-city-bancorp-keep-climbing-after-2q-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Hudson City Bancorp keep climbing after 2Q earnings?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/can-hudson-city-bancorp-keep-climbing-after-2q-earnings/">Can Hudson City Bancorp keep climbing after 2Q earnings?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/can-hudson-city-bancorp-keep-climbing-after-2q-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19104854/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/21/can-hudson-city-bancorp-keep-climbing-after-2q-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>HCBK</category><category>Hudson City Bancorp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>second-quarter earnings</category><category>short interest</category><category>short sellers</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sunday Funnies: Economics -- art or science]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sunday-funnies/" rel="tag">Sunday Funnies</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bni/" rel="tag">Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNI)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/question-mark01.jpg" />In running a very tight stock screen recently for value plays<a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys/key-ratios"> Burlington Northern Santa Fe</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/financials/burlington-northern-santa-fe-corporation/bni/nys/key-ratios">BNI</a>) showed up on a list of 14 stocks. Interestingly all the large railroad stocks did. This reminded me of several stories I have done on the subject, the most recent being <a title="View Chasing Value: Watch BNI -- the heck with Citigroup on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/chasing-value-watch-bni-the-heck-with-citigroup/" target="_blank">Chasing Value: Watch BNI -- the heck with Citigroup</a>.</p>
<p>To summarize, about six weeks ago a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) analyst declared it was time to sell the stock when BNI was trading in the mid $60s -- I said <em>investors should do the opposite, it was a great value</em>. Friday the stock closed at $76.98. Even at this price it is a value and ever more so with oil prices steadly creeping up.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sunday Funnies: Economics -- art or science</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/">Sunday Funnies: Economics -- art or science</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19060017/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/07/sunday-funnies-economics-art-or-science/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>bni</category><category>burlington northern</category><category>BurlingtonNorthern</category><category>c</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>dollar cost averaging</category><category>DollarCostAveraging</category><category>index funds</category><category>IndexFunds</category><category>jp morgan chase</category><category>jpm</category><category>JpMorganChase</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>sunday funnies</category><category>SundayFunnies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why take advice from Citigroup? Or any other analysts for that matter?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/why-take-advice-from-citigroup-or-any-other-analyst-for-that-ma/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/why-take-advice-from-citigroup-or-any-other-analyst-for-that-ma/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/why-take-advice-from-citigroup-or-any-other-analyst-for-that-ma/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-reports/" rel="tag">Analyst Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analyst-upgrades-and-downgrades/" rel="tag">Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/citi.jpg" alt="" />A lot of readers have been thinking similar thoughts to someone who commented on my recent post: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/chasing-value-watch-bni-the-heck-with-citigroup/" title="View Chasing Value: Watch BNI -- the heck with Citigroup on BloggingStocks">Chasing Value: Watch BNI -- the heck with Citigroup</a>.<br />
<ul>
    <li><em>Donald wrote, "Why the hell would I take advice from a company, that as a whole, its Net income was US$ &minus;27.684 billion for 2008.</em> </li>
</ul>
While this is an obvious question from a skeptical investor, and we all have good reason to be skeptical, it obscures a more important issue. Is there a relationship between the financial standing of the bank and the value of an individual analyst or adviser? The answer is, absent any conflicts of interest, that there is not.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/why-take-advice-from-citigroup-or-any-other-analyst-for-that-ma/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why take advice from Citigroup? Or any other analysts for that matter?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/why-take-advice-from-citigroup-or-any-other-analyst-for-that-ma/">Why take advice from Citigroup? Or any other analysts for that matter?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/why-take-advice-from-citigroup-or-any-other-analyst-for-that-ma/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1532243/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/29/why-take-advice-from-citigroup-or-any-other-analyst-for-that-ma/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>BAC</category><category>C</category><category>Citi</category><category>Citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>financial advisor</category><category>FinancialAdvisor</category><category>Merril Lynch</category><category>MerrilLynch</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Pfizer finds new annual low after scrapping two late-stage drugs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/pfizer-finds-new-annual-low-after-scrapping-two-late-stage-drugs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/pfizer-finds-new-annual-low-after-scrapping-two-late-stage-drugs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/pfizer-finds-new-annual-low-after-scrapping-two-late-stage-drugs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p>The shares of Dow component <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">Pfizer Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) slipped to a fresh 52-week low out of the gate this morning, after the pharmaceutical firm said it was <a href="http://www.biospace.com/news_story.aspx?StoryID=127519&amp;full=1">canceling development</a> of two experimental drugs in late-stage trials. Pfizer is scrapping work on esreboxetine, a fibromyalgia treatment, and PD 332,334, a drug for generalized anxiety disorder, because "it was considered unlikely that either compound would provide meaningful benefit to patients beyond the current standard of care."</p>
<p>Currently, Pfizer is fumbling to find a replacement for its successful cholesterol drug, Lipitor, which loses patent protection in 2011. The pharma firm isn't having much luck, though. Two late-stage drugs for pancreatic cancer and for obesity were also recently dust-binned after disappointing study results.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/pfizer-finds-new-annual-low-after-scrapping-two-late-stage-drugs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pfizer finds new annual low after scrapping two late-stage drugs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/pfizer-finds-new-annual-low-after-scrapping-two-late-stage-drugs/">Pfizer finds new annual low after scrapping two late-stage drugs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/pfizer-finds-new-annual-low-after-scrapping-two-late-stage-drugs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1469958/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/24/pfizer-finds-new-annual-low-after-scrapping-two-late-stage-drugs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>annual low</category><category>AnnualLow</category><category>inthenews</category><category>late-stage drug</category><category>Late-stageDrug</category><category>options</category><category>pfe</category><category>pfizer</category><category>pharmaceutical stocks</category><category>PharmaceuticalStocks</category><category>phase III</category><category>PhaseIii</category><category>wye</category><category>wyeth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why is put volume exploding on Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/why-is-put-volume-exploding-on-potash-corp-of-saskatchewan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/why-is-put-volume-exploding-on-potash-corp-of-saskatchewan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/why-is-put-volume-exploding-on-potash-corp-of-saskatchewan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><p>When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">POT</a>) fell from its June 2008 peak of $241.62, it fell hard. The stock bottomed out at $47.54 in early December, marking an 80.3% decline from peak to nadir. The shares have recently shown signs of life, though, having gained 78.7% during the past two months.</p>
<p>Even more compelling, POT closed last Friday atop resistance from its 20-week moving average for the first time since August, and appears poised to do so again this week. So, with the stock rallying back from its lows, why are investors gravitating toward bearish bets?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/why-is-put-volume-exploding-on-potash-corp-of-saskatchewan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why is put volume exploding on Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/why-is-put-volume-exploding-on-potash-corp-of-saskatchewan/">Why is put volume exploding on Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/why-is-put-volume-exploding-on-potash-corp-of-saskatchewan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458227/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/why-is-put-volume-exploding-on-potash-corp-of-saskatchewan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>options</category><category>POT</category><category>potash corp. of saskatchewan</category><category>PotashCorp.OfSaskatchewan</category><category>puts</category><category>sentiment</category><category>straddle</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can VMware surprise skeptical investors with stronger-than-expected earnings?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/can-vmware-suprise-skeptical-investors-with-stronger-than-expect/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/can-vmware-suprise-skeptical-investors-with-stronger-than-expect/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/can-vmware-suprise-skeptical-investors-with-stronger-than-expect/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p>Virtualization specialist <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vmware-inc/vmw/nys">VMware, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vmware-inc/vmw/nys">VMW</a>) is scheduled to report its fourth-quarter earnings next Monday, Jan. 26, after the market closes. Ahead of the announcement, analysts are expecting a profit of 26 cents per share on sales of $516 million. The company has a mixed history in the earnings spotlight; during the past four reporting periods, VMW has matched estimates once, missed once, and surprised to the upside twice.</p>
<p>Prior to next week's release, Wall Street is aligned almost unanimously in the bearish camp. The stock sports 16 Holds and 3 Strong Sell ratings, according to Zacks, compared to just 2 Strong Buys. These skeptical analysts have placed an average 12-month price target of $26.33 on the shares, representing a reasonable 30% premium to Tuesday's closing price.</p>
<p>Elsewhere, short interest represents a whopping 14.6% of VMW's float. This accumulation of bearish bets would take nearly 10 trading days to fully repurchase at the stock's average daily volume. In the event of another upside earnings surprise, the shares could rally as these shorts rush to cover their positions.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/can-vmware-suprise-skeptical-investors-with-stronger-than-expect/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can VMware surprise skeptical investors with stronger-than-expected earnings?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/can-vmware-suprise-skeptical-investors-with-stronger-than-expect/">Can VMware surprise skeptical investors with stronger-than-expected earnings?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/can-vmware-suprise-skeptical-investors-with-stronger-than-expect/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1436133/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/21/can-vmware-suprise-skeptical-investors-with-stronger-than-expect/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>analysts</category><category>contrarian</category><category>fourth-quarter earnings</category><category>Fourth-quarterEarnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>options</category><category>sentiment</category><category>vmw</category><category>VMware inc.</category><category>VmwareInc.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
