Stocks were set to close almost at the highs of the trading day based upon a continued hope of solid earnings and a mixed housing market picture. Expected news also drove anticipations for the week.

Here were today's unofficial closing bell levels:

Dow Jones 10,525.43 +100.81 (0.97%)
S&P 500 1,115.01 +12.35 (1.12%)
Nasdaq 2,296.43 +26.96 (1.19%)

Top Analyst Calls

Earlier this year, General Growth Properties Inc. (GGP) rejected a $10 billion buyout offer from rival Simon Property Group (SPG), but Simon Property is not giving up completely. Wednesday Simon Property announced it would up its offer to $10 per share for GGP in exchange for 25% of the company.

The offer that was quickly rejected a couple of months ago placed a $9 value on GGP stock, and rose some anti-trust concerns.

I was checking out one of my favorite blogs yesterday (UniWatchBlog.com - operated by the obsessive Paul Lukas) and I found myself with a subject for this week's JockStocks. Is the NFL a monopoly? Should the league be exempt from the Sherman Antitrust Act?

This all stems from a suit by a company known as American Needle, which sued the NFL in 2000 when the league selected Reebok to be the exclusive provider of licensed NFL apparel. American Needle sued the NFL, stating that the Reebok deal violated antitrust statutes becasue the league and Reebok "conspired to stifle competition and inflate prices."

Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) soared to a new annual high Thursday morning after the chipmaker settled its antitrust case against rival Intel (INTC). Under the terms of the agreement, Intel will shell out $1.25 billion to AMD, and will abide by a new set of rules for conducting business. The pact also includes a renewed cross-license agreement between the two chip titans.

In prepared comments, AMD CEO Dirk Meyer called the settlement a game-changer. "We are optimistic that it will usher a new era for our industry," he said. "We recognize that it will take time for people to understand how the operating conditions in the processor business have changed. But make no mistake -- they have changed."

The latest litigation has Intel Inside.

The State of New York is going after Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) over antitrust allegations. State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is accusing the largest chip manufacturer in the world that it is trying to secure a global monopoly for microprocessors.

For several years, Cuomo said that Intel has pushed the likes of Dell (NYSE: DELL) and Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ) to agree to the exclusive use of Intel's gear in exchange for billions of dollars in payments. The hefty cash outlays have given what Cuomo called a "stranglehold" on the market.

Chip maker Intel Corp (NASDAQ: INTC) had some embarrassing emails published today by the European Union that show the company may have been strong arming its customers into buying its products over competing chip makers.

The emails were part of the evidence that led to a record EU fine set against the company last May of $1.45 billion, when it was determined that the company had used strong-arm sales tactics in its competition with Advanced Micro Designs (NYSE: AMD).

On Thursday morning, European Union regulators announced the launch of an antitrust probe into U.S. software maker Oracle's (NASDAQ: ORCL) takeover of Sun Microsystems. The regulatory group believes that the deal could lead to higher prices and limited choice for database software. Approval from this group is considered the main stumbling block for the deal, which has cleared the Department of Justice in the United States.

The final decision has a deadline of 90 days, or January 19, 2009. By this date, the European Commission can decide to clear or to block the deal. More often than not, the Commission will force companies to make changes that would eliminate any concerns over antitrust regulations.

Christine A. Varney heads up antitrust at the Department of Justice, and she's going hunting. She is the point person for a group consisting of the presidential administration and some Congressional Democrats that is looking to put the breaks on large companies in several industries.

Already, airlines have run into roadblocks when requesting relief from antitrust regulations. Varney & Co. are digging into complaints by AT&T (NYSE: ATT) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ) that cable competitors – e.g., Cablevision (NYSE: CVC) – have locked them out of the market for cable company-produced programming.

(Imagine that, a phone company complaining! Usually, they're the objects of derision.)

Credit-card concerns Visa, Inc. (NYSE: V) and MasterCard, Inc. (NYSE: MA) will be shelling out up to $2.75 billion to settle an antitrust suit with Discover Financial Services (NYSE: DFS). Specifically, MasterCard will pay Discover $862.5 million in the fourth quarter, while Visa will fork over $1.89 billion over the course of 2009. Following the release of the settlement's details, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods is weighing in favorably on all three firms.

Sanjay Sakhrani called the news "a big win for Discover, as it provides an additional cushion to contend with the implications of a weaker U.S. economy." He expects the payments will add about $1.75 to Discover's earnings per share. However, he also cited the report as an upside catalyst for MasterCard and Visa, as it eliminates an overhang on shares of both companies -- an assertion supported by analyst Julio C. Quinteros, Jr., of Goldman Sachs.

Unfortunately, though, it's not all sunshine and rainbows in the credit-card group today. Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) has filed its own suit against Discover in New York State Supreme Court, alleging that it's entitled to a chunk of the $2.75-billion settlement. DFS was spun off from Morgan Stanley last year, and the latter company claims that it should receive a portion of the award under the terms of a special dividend agreement.

Not so fast, says Discover, which alleges that its parent company is in violation of their spinoff agreement, and "the amount of Morgan Stanley's special dividend is a matter of dispute." Morgan fired back that "there is absolutely no basis for Discover's claim that the agreement was breached." Stay tuned to see how this credit-card drama plays out -- in early trading, shares of all three credit card companies were higher.

Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at Schaeffer's Investment Research. She is featured in the video series Schaeffer's Daily Q&A on SchaeffersResearch.com.

Since Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL)'s iTune virtually rules the music download business, it is not surprising that some people in the music industry would challenge its dominance from time to time. One of those times is now.

Artists are beginning to realize that the iTunes process of selling individual songs is hurting their album sales. According to The Wall Street Journal, "Label executives, managers and artists chafe against the iTunes policy that prevents them from selling an album only." Indeed, some artists like Kid Rock have stayed away from iTunes and their sales have done quite well.

The plan of selling music without iTunes is only likely to last so long. Apple's 99-cents-per-song format has proved irresistible to most customers. Bands that make a great deal of money may be able to risk staying off iTunes, but if they have one or two albums that do poorly, they will come back.

Perhaps the only way that labels and artists will break Apple's hold on music is to bring an antitrust suit. Apple does control enough of the market to make a case. Who knows?

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.

Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD) shares are trading higher today after rival Intel Corp. (NASADQ: INTC) posted a second-quarter profit of $1.6 billion, or 28 cents per share, ahead of analysts' estimates of 25 cents per share, reflecting strong demand for processors. AMD is also getting a boost into its earnings tomorrow from news that INTC may face new charges from European antitrust regulators, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal. If you think that the stock won't fall by too much in the coming months, then now could be a good time to look at a bullish hedged trade on AMD.

After hitting a one-year high of $16.19 last July, the stock hit a one-year low of $4.53 yesterday. AMD opened this morning at $4.90. So far today the stock has hit a low of $4.68 and a high of $4.95. As of 1:55, AMD is trading at $4.93, up 21 cents (4.4%). The chart for AMD looks bearish and steady, while S&P gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.

For a bullish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a January covered call at the $5 level. A covered call is an options position that combines the purchase of stock with the sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 30% return in just 6 months if AMD is above $5 at January expiration. AMD would have to fall by more than 21% before we would start to lose money.

AMD hasn't been below $3.90, which would be the break-even point, at all in the past year and has shown support around $4.50 recently. This trade could be risky if today's encouraging Intel results are a result of them taking even more market share from AMD, but even if that happens, this position could be protected by the 30% downside protection on this trade.

Brent Archer is an options analyst and writer at Investors Observer. At publication time, Brent neither owns nor controls positions in AMD. He does control bullish hedged positions in INTC.

Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) delivered extremely good earnings, surpassing what most analysts thought the big chip company would deliver. Global notebook sales were the key source of the company's success.

With 80% of the world's PC and server chip sales, Intel has little to compete with but itself. That may prove to be its undoing. Late word is that Intel is about to be hit by major antitrust charges in Europe. According to The Wall Street Journal, "European regulators are preparing to file new antitrust charges against Intel."

The case against Intel -- the same as the ones being brought in the U.S. and South Korea -- is that the company took a number of actions to shut out sales of chips and computers with chips from smaller competitor AMD (NYSE: AMD).

Intel has begun to take on the role that Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) has a decade ago. It has become so big that authorities are questioning how it got to its place of dominance. In essence, regulators are saying Intel cheated.

While Intel may suffer fines and other sanctions, the cases against the company may be the only chance AMD has of surviving. With over $5 billion in debt, operating losses, and falling gross margins, reparations from Intel's antitrust cases are probably its only life preserver.

Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.

I love the long-term prospects of Visa (NYSE: V) and MasterCard (NYSE: MA), but I do have to concede that a pesky lawsuit by Discover (NYSE: DFS) is the one big fly in this story's soup. According to the following article, Discover wants both credit-card companies to pay $6 billion for perceived violations of antitrust regulations. Unfortunately, these damages could be tripled if Visa and MasterCard lose. One of the big problems here is that American Express (NYSE: AXP) already won a settlement of $2.1 billion from Visa late last year and the company established an escrow fund worth $3 billion for litigation payments.

I'll admit, this lawsuit does give me and my credit-card investment thesis a little case of the shivers. After all, tripling $6 billion to $18 billion means that a huge amount of money is in play here, and a successful outcome for Discover would hamper the stocks of the two big card entities. When you read through the litigation risks in Visa's SEC filings (out of MasterCard and Visa, the latter is my favorite since it is still relatively fresh off its IPO and MasterCard has already had a big run), they are pretty scary. And the fact that the $6 billion figure just came to light this week has probably soured the perception of some investors and analysts. Nevertheless, all the previous litigation talk didn't stop Visa's stock from taking off after its IPO earlier this year.

.

When I go to a Barnes & Noble (NYSE: BKS) or a Borders (NYSE: BGP) store, I really can't tell much of a difference. That's not a bad thing – at least for me. Hey, I have lots of choices – and not just books.

But for investors, the situation is a problem. So, instead of fighting, why not B&N and Borders join forces?

Well, according to the Wall Street Journal [a paid publication], there are signs of a possible deal as B&N has put together a team to explore the option.

However, there is a big hurdle: antitrust regulators. The federal government will scrutinize the deal heavily given that Barnes & Noble is #1 and Borders is #2 in the US marketplace.

Barnes & Noble will argue that the market is much different now with online operators like Amazon.com (NASDAQ: AMZN).

And timing is another key. After all, if there's a change in the White House, antitrust enforcement is likely to get tougher.

Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements. He also operates MergerBook.com.

Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.'s (NASDAQ: SIRI) $5 billion acquisition of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: XMSR) was cleared by the U.S. Department of Justice. Now, all eyes turn to Federal Communications Commission to determine if satellite radio lives or dies.

The acquisition -- not a merger -- has been held up for eons by phony arguments that combining these two floundering companies would limit choice. Terrestrial radio and consumer groups have been lobbying hard against the deal, arguing that anything that benefits Howard Stern can't be good for America.

I can't see how the FCC can block a deal that the DOJ approved after examining the deal under and electron microscope. The medium won't survive if the companies stay separate. Even fans of satellite radio admit that it is a niche medium. Then again, so is cable TV.

For me satellite radio is a godsend, particularly on long road trips. I enjoy listening to Sirius while tapping out my blog posts. I particularly like the commercial-free music channels. Regular radio has annoyed music fans by piling on commercial after commercial between tiny slivers of music.

Satellite radio can avoid the fate of BetaMax by continuing to produce high-quality content that people want to buy. It's that simple and that complicated.

Freelance writer Jonathan Berr edits the blog Ketchup and Eggs.