<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Is Whirlpool Undervalued?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-whirlpool-undervalued/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-whirlpool-undervalued/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-whirlpool-undervalued/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/whirlpool-logo-oval.jpg"  alt="" />If you took advantage, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/11/15/whirlpool-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-71/#continued">as outlined</a>, of Whirlpool Corporation's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/whirlpool-corp/whr/nys">WHR</a>) autumn dip, to scoop-up some shares, you made the correct move. <br />
<br />
Appliance manufacturer extraordinary Whirlpool, first discussed here on March 13, 2009 at a price of $34.47, over-corrected this summer, formed <a href="http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Symbol=whr&amp;Refer=http://clearstation.etrade.com/">a bear-hug</a>, and bottomed at/near $69.50, slightly below the expected $71 bottom. <br />
<br />
Look for WHR to generate a 4-6% revenue increase in 2011, after a likely 5-7% revenue rise in 2010, led by strong demand for kitchen and laundry appliances in emerging markets. Latin America sales (especially Brazil) should be particularly strong -- rising better than 10% in 2011 and 2012. U.S. sales should continue to gain momentum in 2011, with a 2-4% rise expected.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-whirlpool-undervalued/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Whirlpool Undervalued?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-whirlpool-undervalued/">Is Whirlpool Undervalued?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-whirlpool-undervalued/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19832812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/07/is-whirlpool-undervalued/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>Whirlpool Corp</category><category>WHR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whirlpool Having Problems After Q2 Release]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/20/whirlpool-having-problems-after-q2-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/20/whirlpool-having-problems-after-q2-release/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/20/whirlpool-having-problems-after-q2-release/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/whirlpool-logo-oval.jpg"  alt="" />Poor Whirlpool (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys">WHR</a>). With a little over an hour to go before the market closes up shop for the day, the stock is down 3.7% to $87.99. Shareholders have to be disappointed, considering the strong earnings report that the company released this morning. <br />
<br />
According to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/whirlpool-earnings/19560888/">this item</a>, adjusted profit calculated out to $2.82 per share for the second quarter. Analysts were expecting somewhere around $2.17 per share. Furthermore, guidance from management for the full fiscal year received an upgrade. What do you think? Are these results worth a round of selling?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/20/whirlpool-having-problems-after-q2-release/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whirlpool Having Problems After Q2 Release</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/20/whirlpool-having-problems-after-q2-release/">Whirlpool Having Problems After Q2 Release</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/investing/whirlpool-earnings/19560888/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/20/whirlpool-having-problems-after-q2-release/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19561733/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/20/whirlpool-having-problems-after-q2-release/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>whirlpool</category><category>WHR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whirlpool Wows the Market with Q1 Release]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/26/whirlpool-wows-the-market-with-q1-release/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/26/whirlpool-wows-the-market-with-q1-release/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/26/whirlpool-wows-the-market-with-q1-release/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/whirlpool-logo-oval.jpg"  alt="" />All I can say is, wow! Whirlpool Corporation (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys">WHR</a>) is having a spectacular trading session. I'm not sure where the stock will settle out at by the end of the day, but let me tell you, what I'm seeing on my screen at the time of this writing is incredibly impressive. The stock is up almost $12, or over 11%. Volume is robust.</p>
<p>The maker of various appliances under trademarks such as Maytag and KitchenAid has been a great stock to hold over the last twelve months. I mean, just look at the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys/tech-chart">one-year chart</a>. If that doesn't scream bullish, nothing does.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/26/whirlpool-wows-the-market-with-q1-release/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whirlpool Wows the Market with Q1 Release</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/26/whirlpool-wows-the-market-with-q1-release/">Whirlpool Wows the Market with Q1 Release</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/whirlpool-1q-profit-more-than-doubles/999366/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/26/whirlpool-wows-the-market-with-q1-release/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19454654/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/26/whirlpool-wows-the-market-with-q1-release/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kitchenaid</category><category>maytag</category><category>whirlpool</category><category>WHR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consider U.S. Steel, Because Steel Is Back in Style]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/consider-u-s-steel-because-steel-is-back-in-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/consider-u-s-steel-because-steel-is-back-in-style/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/consider-u-s-steel-because-steel-is-back-in-style/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/uss-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />It appears the reviews of U.S. Steel (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">X</a>), first discussed here <a href="http:// http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/us-steel-rockets-higher/#continued">on April 15, 2009</a> at a price of $27.61, just can't keep up with the steelmaker's performance. <br />
<br />
Originally expected earn only a slight profit in 2010, look for U.S. Steel to return solidly to the profit side of the ledger, aided by a likely 40-50% surge in revenue this year. <br />
<br />
The reason? The U.S./global economic recoveries, which are driving large increases in steel demand. Durable goods and big ticket items like washers, driers, and kitchen ranges require steel, and their bullish trend bodes well for X.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/consider-u-s-steel-because-steel-is-back-in-style/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consider U.S. Steel, Because Steel Is Back in Style</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/consider-u-s-steel-because-steel-is-back-in-style/">Consider U.S. Steel, Because Steel Is Back in Style</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/consider-u-s-steel-because-steel-is-back-in-style/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19437986/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/13/consider-u-s-steel-because-steel-is-back-in-style/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>global economy</category><category>steel</category><category>us economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whirlpool is rising with the global economy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/whirlpool-is-rising-with-the-global-economy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/whirlpool-is-rising-with-the-global-economy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/whirlpool-is-rising-with-the-global-economy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/logo_whirlpool.jpg" alt="" />Talk about advances. Institutional investor (II) sentiment on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys">Whirlpool Corp. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/whirlpool-corporation/whr/nys">WHR</a>) has strengthened in-sync with the strengthening global economy, and that's why I'm reiterating my Buy rating for the appliance manufacturer, first recommended <a href="http:// http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/11/whirlpool-knows-emerging-markets-are-appliances-new-frontier/#continued">on April 13, 2009</a> at a price of $34.47. If you bought WHR in April, you're up a remarkable 111%.<br /><br />Whirlpool's pleasant growth story remains the same: emerging market sales, particularly in Latin America (20% of revenue), are sending growth signals; Europe and the U.S. may lag for 1-2 more quarters; the U.S. market looks like the major hurdle -- with household formation likely to remain sluggish into mid-2010. Overall, look for FY2010 revenue to increase 4-6%; in FY2011, WHR is likely to return to double-digit revenue growth.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/whirlpool-is-rising-with-the-global-economy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whirlpool is rising with the global economy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/whirlpool-is-rising-with-the-global-economy/">Whirlpool is rising with the global economy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/whirlpool-is-rising-with-the-global-economy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19215580/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/29/whirlpool-is-rising-with-the-global-economy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>domestic appliances</category><category>DomesticAppliances</category><category>Whirlpool Corp.</category><category>WHR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell: Earnings enthusiasm shows signs of slipping]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/before-the-bell-earnings-enthusiasm-shows-signs-of-slipping/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/before-the-bell-earnings-enthusiasm-shows-signs-of-slipping/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/before-the-bell-earnings-enthusiasm-shows-signs-of-slipping/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fo/" rel="tag">Fortune Brands (FO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hon/" rel="tag">Honeywell Intl (HON)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nasdaq/" rel="tag">NASDAQ</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-black-white.jpg" />Wall Street watchers can be excused for feeling a little whipsawed this week. After watching stocks lose ground early in the week, they roared back Thursday, riding high on a bevy of upbeat earnings reports. That enthusiasm remains partially on display this morning with two of the three major U.S. stock indexes showing a positive opening ahead of the morning bell.</p>
<p>At about 7 a.m. ET, the Nasdaq Composite Index and S&amp;P 500 were slightly higher, while the Dow Jones industrial average was down by about 4 points. The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/closing-bell-djia-component-earnings-lift-market-ebay-hte-mi/">Dow gained 1.3%</a> Thursday to close the session at 10,081.31, led by the strong earnings reports from five of the benchmark index's 30 component stocks.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/before-the-bell-earnings-enthusiasm-shows-signs-of-slipping/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Before the bell: Earnings enthusiasm shows signs of slipping</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/before-the-bell-earnings-enthusiasm-shows-signs-of-slipping/">Before the bell: Earnings enthusiasm shows signs of slipping</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/before-the-bell-earnings-enthusiasm-shows-signs-of-slipping/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19206852/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/23/before-the-bell-earnings-enthusiasm-shows-signs-of-slipping/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>exelon</category><category>featured</category><category>utility stocks</category><category>whirlpool</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schepp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How about a federal 'cash for clunkers-appliances' program?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/fridge_ericas_kitchen.jpg" width="220" height="357" alt="" />The much-maligned federal government's <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/the-top-cash-for-clunkers-vehicles/607200">"cash-for-clunkers" program</a>, is, nevertheless, stimulating the U.S. economy.</p>
<p>True, it may take new cars sales that would normally occur in 2010 and bring them forward to 2009, but that fact, combined with the extra customer traffic the program has created in the nation's auto showrooms, has bumped up auto sales -- providing a slight tailwind for the U.S. economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How about a federal 'cash for clunkers-appliances' program?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/">How about a federal 'cash for clunkers-appliances' program?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19133279/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/18/how-about-a-federal-cash-for-clunkers-appliances-program/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>cash for clunkers</category><category>durable goods</category><category>Keynes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sears offering hedge for consumers who lose their job -- good idea?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/sears-offering-hedge-for-consumers-who-lose-their-job-good-id/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/sears-offering-hedge-for-consumers-who-lose-their-job-good-id/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/sears-offering-hedge-for-consumers-who-lose-their-job-good-id/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas"><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/07/sears1.jpg" />Sears Holdings</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>), a retailer whose competitive colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">Target</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys">TGT</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/best-buy-incorporated/bby/nys">Best Buy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/best-buy-incorporated/bby/nys">BBY</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>), wants to improve its brand equity and find a new path to growth. As such, it's willing to employ all kinds of initiatives, especially ones that will form a nice image with the consumer during this dreadful economic contraction. </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090629-714418.html"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a><em> </em>(subscription required), Sears is trying out a program that offers protection against the risk of investing in an expensive appliance during a time when job security is not as secure as it used to be. </p>
<p>The program will run for a specified time period beginning next week, and the basic gist is this: buy an appliance priced $399 or higher on a Sears credit card and, and if you lose your job, Sears will credit one twelfth of the cost every month. Still no job after one year? Keep the appliance, your debt will be forgiven.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/sears-offering-hedge-for-consumers-who-lose-their-job-good-id/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sears offering hedge for consumers who lose their job -- good idea?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/sears-offering-hedge-for-consumers-who-lose-their-job-good-id/">Sears offering hedge for consumers who lose their job -- good idea?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090629-714418.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/sears-offering-hedge-for-consumers-who-lose-their-job-good-id/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19085630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/03/sears-offering-hedge-for-consumers-who-lose-their-job-good-id/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>BBY</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>sears holdings</category><category>SHLD</category><category>Target</category><category>TGT</category><category>unemployment</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sears: The GM of retailers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/sears-the-gm-of-retailers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/sears-the-gm-of-retailers/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/sears-the-gm-of-retailers/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jwn/" rel="tag">Nordstrom, Inc (JWN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cpki/" rel="tag">Calif Pizza Kitchen (CPKI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The chain that once dubbed itself "where America shops" is increasingly a place shoppers avoid. Despite its much-publicized recovery efforts, investors should consider steering clear, too. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears Holdings Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>) has been in the news a great deal lately, announcing awful sales results and planning yet another stock buyback to prop up its flailing price. <br />
<p> </p>
<p>The recent store changes have not worked, and neither will the financial engineering. This company is on its way down, and a visit to a local store showed me why. <br /></p>
<p>Sears used to be the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) of retailers -- an apt analogy when both were all-American giants, and just as apt today as both struggle. Sears had completely lost its way when vulture investor, Eddie Lampert, bought the company in late 2004 and combined it with Kmart. Wall Street analysts went nuts, pushing the stock price to $192 a share. <br /></p>
<p>Today, Wall Street has lowered that price to near $40. <br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/sears-the-gm-of-retailers/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sears: The GM of retailers</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/sears-the-gm-of-retailers/">Sears: The GM of retailers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/sears-the-gm-of-retailers/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1394748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/sears-the-gm-of-retailers/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>eddie lampert</category><category>EddieLampert</category><category>fleece</category><category>kenmore</category><category>nordstroms</category><category>retail</category><category>sears</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most unexpected brand castoff]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brk-a/" rel="tag">Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/best-worst-200x267-brand-castoff..jpg" alt="" />This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature.</em></p>
<p>There have always been brand decisions that seem to come out of left field. Some make you wonder what they were thinking, while others make you wonder what took so long. The year 2008 was no exception.</p>
<p>It came as something of a surprise when in June <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">Exxon Mobil Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys">XOM</a>) announced that it would <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/13/as-exxon-xom-exits-retail-gas-business-avoids-bad-pr/">sell off many of its retail gasoline stations</a> to local owners. While Exxon continued to post record quarterly earnings, and fuel prices spiked to all-time highs earlier this year, gasoline retailers in fact have faced razor-thin margins and fierce competition. It would take a significant boost in prices to make gas stations profitable, a notion that didn't seem to worthwhile back in June. Wonder what they think of that decision now that gasoline prices have fallen to a multiyear low?</p>
<p><iframe height="200" frameborder="0" align="right" width="205" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=157426&amp;pollId=157706&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance"></iframe>I recall when Kinko's, the photocopying and faxing service provider with the catchy name, seemed to explode out of nowhere. And it seemed a little sad when <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FedEx Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fedex-corporation/fdx/nys">FDX</a>) gobbled up the successful upstart. But it was probably inevitable that the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/kinkos-it-was-nice-knowing-you/">Kinko's name would be phazed out</a>. It took quite a while, but FedEx finally announced eariler this year that it would just that. The newly christened FedEx Office (not so catchy, is it?) wants to shed itself of the image of a photocopying and faxing place to that of a back-office services provider for small to mid sized businesses. But will that turn out to be worth the $891 million they estimate the name change would cost? Time will tell.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most unexpected brand castoff</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most unexpected brand castoff</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1385795/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/08/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-unexpected-brand-castoff/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>Berkshire Hathaway</category><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>brands</category><category>BRK.A</category><category>Exxon</category><category>Exxon Mobil</category><category>featured</category><category>FedEx</category><category>FedEx Office</category><category>fuel prices</category><category>GE</category><category>General Electric</category><category>Kinkos</category><category>LG Group</category><category>Mars</category><category>Wrigley</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GE may unlock value by spinoffs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/ge-may-unlock-value-by-spinoffs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/ge-may-unlock-value-by-spinoffs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/ge-may-unlock-value-by-spinoffs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p>In a move that many investors have wanted, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>) just came out and said that it is mulling over the potential spin-off of its consumer and industrial division.  </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7BB6AED06B%2D60E6%2D4187%2D92B6%2DD7EE8CAD8C9F%7D&amp;siteid=mktw">MarketWatch</a>, "The conglomerate said shareholders will receive stakes in the new entity covering ts appliances, lighting and industrial units."</p>
<p>This is great news for investors and may be a precursor for other large conglomerates that have seen their stock prices stagnate for more than six years, to start spinning off divisions in order to unlock value for shareholders.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">IsraelNewsletter.com</font></em></a><em>. DISCLOSURE: Writer's fund has no position in any stock mentioned, as of 7/10/08.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/ge-may-unlock-value-by-spinoffs/">GE may unlock value by spinoffs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7BB6AED06B%2D60E6%2D4187%2D92B6%2DD7EE8CAD8C9F%7D&amp;siteid=mktw>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/ge-may-unlock-value-by-spinoffs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1251390/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/10/ge-may-unlock-value-by-spinoffs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>ge</category><category>General electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>inthenews</category><category>shareholder value</category><category>ShareholderValue</category><category>spinoff</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Home Depot vs. Lowe's: Battle of the Brands]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/home-depot-vs-lowes-battle-of-the-brands/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/home-depot-vs-lowes-battle-of-the-brands/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/home-depot-vs-lowes-battle-of-the-brands/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/low/" rel="tag">Lowe's Cos (LOW)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/" rel="tag">Battle of the Brands</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/battle-of-the-brands/">Battle of the Brands</a></strong> feature. Let us know which brand you prefer, and check out other Battle of the Brands posts.</em></p>
<p><iframe border="0" align="right" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1089&amp;view=108443&amp;pollId=108531&amp;channel=aol_us_moneynews1" frameborder="0" width="175" scrolling="no" height="125"></iframe>A few months ago, I moved into a larger apartment and found that I would need to make numerous trips to the hardware store each week -- and sometimes twice on Saturdays. The list of projects I had in mind for my new pad was as long as a city block and I knew some choices needed to be made. The most important one: Should I go to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">Home Depot </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Lowe's</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">LOW</a>)?</p>
<p>I always go to Home Depot to get lumber or some screws for the toolbox, or to glance at the power tools that I always dream of finding a use for. I go to Lowe's to pick up a closet organizer or to look at the latest washer and dryers on sale. They're both big box home improvement stores, but each one has its own special place in the world.</p>
<p>When I first drive into the lot of the big orange beast, I always see construction crews hauling lumber and Sheetrock into their vans. I know these people didn't search online for what they needed here, mainly because the HD site only has 20% of their actual inventory online. If you want to know what's in Home Depot, you actually have to go to Home Depot. As I walk inside, I find this magical place where men can walk happily around sawdust filled floors, sans spouse, testing out power tools and talking shop with other men. Workers in bright orange aprons walk side-by-side with beeping forklifts that weave in and out of crowded isles, creating an atmosphere that would intimidate any novice do-it-yourselfer. This is the department store for DIY weekend warriors. This is <em>home</em>.</p>
<p>I certainly don't get the same feeling driving to Lowe's. Lowe's is more focused on the aesthetics of home improvement and the final product, compared to Home Depot, which I feel is more about tools and parts. I can search through the Lowe's website much easier than Home Depot's, and even place an order to pick-up whatever I need, which is always good for the novice fixer-upper. Walking into Lowe's, I see couples walking on perfectly swept floors down extra-bright, super-wide aisles. I walk past tons of appliances and machinery that call out to me: top-of-the-line refrigerators, washing machines, and lawn tractors; I walk past them in amazement. This is a place for the general public and the occasional fix-it-yourself team; and this place takes pride in targeting women in their stores -- officials directly aim for the female customer by placing shelves at the perfect height for the 5-foot-4-inch customer.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/home-depot-vs-lowes-battle-of-the-brands/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Home Depot vs. Lowe's: Battle of the Brands</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/home-depot-vs-lowes-battle-of-the-brands/">Home Depot vs. Lowe's: Battle of the Brands</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/home-depot-vs-lowes-battle-of-the-brands/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/862111/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/04/14/home-depot-vs-lowes-battle-of-the-brands/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>Battle of the Brands</category><category>BattleOfTheBrands</category><category>big box store</category><category>DIY</category><category>hardware store</category><category>HardwareStore</category><category>hd</category><category>home depot</category><category>home improvement</category><category>HomeDepot</category><category>Kevin Shult</category><category>KevinShult</category><category>low</category><category>lowe's</category><category>lumber</category><category>power tools</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ Wal-Mart tries again to boost same-store sales with more price cuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/10/wal-mart-tries-again-to-boost-same-store-sales-with-more-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/10/wal-mart-tries-again-to-boost-same-store-sales-with-more-price/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/10/wal-mart-tries-again-to-boost-same-store-sales-with-more-price/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a></p>Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT) is now targeting price cutbacks on selected small home appliances for the Christmas season. Its rollbacks are on nearly 50 home appliances from brands including GE, Hoover and Sharp.<br /><br />Here are some of the listed items and price cuts:<br />-Hoover fusion cyclonic upright vacuum (was $112/now $98)<br />-Mr. Coffee 12-cup programmable coffee maker (was $42.48/now $37.88) and espresso maker (was $29.86/now $24.88)<br />-Sharp .08 cubic foot black microwave (was $54.88/now $49.88)<br />-GE 1.1 cubic foot microwave (was $64.72/now $59.88)<br />-Black &amp; Decker Quick 'N Easy 8-cup food processor (was $29.72/now $24.88)<br /><br />Wal-Mart will continue to roll back the prices of toys, electronics, apparel and more this holiday season. While this is not as extreme as the select electronics price cuts, this is just one more initiative that the company is willing to do whatever it can from keeping those November same-store sales from being as FLAT as the company recently forecast. These cuts are not on such expensive items that they will bite into margins, and they probably got GE, Hoover, and Sharp to take some juice out, ,too.<br /><br />But this is still a trend toward more and more lower-priced items that are driving margins down in an effort to keep from posting flat or negative same-store sales. It has to make you wonder that if the economy is slowing into 2007 what the monster retailer can do to keep its same-store sales higher in 2007.<br /><br />It also makes you wonder now if Wal-Mart will actually endorse a higher minimum wage. If they have to get into the spiral of only worrying about same-store sales instead of raw profits, that would actually make sense. It would increase their labor costs drastically and therefore affect operating costs, but it might result in higher spending from their demographics in 2007.<br /><br />Jon C. Ogg<br />November 10, 2006<br /><br /><em>Jon Ogg is a partner in <a href="http://www.247wallst.com">24/7 Wall St., LLC</a>; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/10/wal-mart-tries-again-to-boost-same-store-sales-with-more-price/"> Wal-Mart tries again to boost same-store sales with more price cuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/10/wal-mart-tries-again-to-boost-same-store-sales-with-more-price/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/699641/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/10/wal-mart-tries-again-to-boost-same-store-sales-with-more-price/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>appliances</category><category>GE</category><category>Hoover</category><category>rollbacks</category><category>Sharp</category><category>Wal Mart</category><category>WalMart</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Ogg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
